Next Article in Journal
Self-Assembled InAs Nanowires as Optical Reflectors
Previous Article in Journal
An In Vitro Study of the Photodynamic Effectiveness of GO-Ag Nanocomposites against Human Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomass-Derived Oxygen and Nitrogen Co-Doped Porous Carbon with Hierarchical Architecture as Sulfur Hosts for High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries

1
International Academy of Optoelectronics at Zhaoqing, South China Normal University, Zhaoqing 526060; China
2
Synergy Innovation Institute of GDUT, Heyuan 517000, China
3
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195221, Russia
4
Institute of Electronic Paper Displays, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(11), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7110402
Submission received: 2 October 2017 / Revised: 6 November 2017 / Accepted: 10 November 2017 / Published: 21 November 2017

Abstract

:
In this work, a facile strategy to synthesize oxygen and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon (ONPC) is reported by one-step pyrolysis of waste coffee grounds. As-prepared ONPC possesses highly rich micro/mesopores as well as abundant oxygen and nitrogen co-doping, which is applied to sulfur hosts as lithium/sulfur batteries’ appropriate cathodes. In battery testing, the sulfur/oxygen and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon (S/ONPC) composite materials reveal a high initial capacity of 1150 mAh·g−1 as well as a reversible capacity of 613 mAh·g−1 after the 100th cycle at 0.2 C. Furthermore, when current density increases to 1 C, a discharge capacity of 331 mAh·g−1 is still attainable. Due to the hierarchical porous framework and oxygen/nitrogen co-doping, the S/ONPC composite exhibits a high utilization of sulfur and good electrochemical performance via the immobilization of the polysulfides through strong chemical binding.

1. Introduction

The lithium/sulfur (Li/S) battery system holds abundant promise in the development of next-generation rechargeable batteries due to its unparalleled theoretical capacity (1672 mAh·g−1), high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh·kg−1), low cost, low environmental pollution, and natural abundance [1]. However, several issues impede the practical use of sulfur cathode materials, including the poor electron conductivity of elemental S and the high solubility of lithium polysulfides (Li2Sx, 4 ≤ x ≤ 8) into the organic electrolytes, which leads to a failure for battery performance [2]. Thus, numerous studies have been conducted to enhance the electrochemical performance of Li/S batteries, mainly by immersing in sulfur with diverse conductive polymers and carbon materials, such as polypyrrole, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and porous carbon [3,4,5,6,7].
The obvious advantages of carbon materials include their high conductivity and good porosity, and thus carbon has been demonstrated as an effective sulfur immobilizer for Li/S batteries with high performance. For example, Xi et al. prepared abundant porous carbon samples from different zinc-containing metal-organic frameworks, which possessed both mesoporosity and microporosity for good sulfur loading and electrochemical utilization [8]. A porous nano-sized spherical carbon was prepared by Schuster et al. with a two-step casting process, to form the cathode of lithium/sulfur batteries in combination with sulfur via a melt-diffusion strategy. As-prepared carbon with an abundant surface area of 2445 m2·g−1 allows the sulfur to distribute homogeneously into the pores, greatly enhancing the electrochemical behavior of the corresponding cathodes [7].
However, the weak mutual effect between carbon host and sulfur, based on physical adsorption, limit the aforementioned designs. Recently, heteroatom dopants, such as oxygen and nitrogen, on carbon materials has been found to play an important role in trapping lithium polysulfides via strong chemical binding [9,10,11]. For example, Zhang et al. demonstrated that the effective chemical binding of S to the oxygen-containing group of graphene can significantly retard the dissolution/diffusion of lithium polysulfides [9,10]. Yu et al. fabricated a novel nitrogen-enriched hierarchical porous carbon via the simple thermolysis of magnesium citrate and NH3 to host sulfur as a Li/S battery cathode. The resulting cathode yields a large reversible capacity and retains a stable reversible capacity even after the 300th cycle of the charge/discharge process at 1 C [11].
Although the above S/C composite materials are well designed at the lab scale, they are still far from commercialization because of the relatively high cost and complicated synthetic approaches. Therefore, there is a need to focus on the preparation of low-cost carbon materials for facilely hosting sulfur. Notably, porous carbons from biomass materials have shown their potential in Li/S battery systems due to their abundance and environmental friendliness as well as the possibility of avoiding the use the sophisticated chemical procedures, in introducing heteroatom dopants into the carbon matrix [12,13,14]. Over the past decade, various biomass materials have been developed for use in supercapacitors, lithium-ion batteries, and sodium-ion batteries. Wang et al. reported a biomass-based activated carbon prepared from willow catkins and applied as electrode materials for supercapacitors with maximal specific capacitances of 340 F g−1 [15]. Jiang et al. synthesized biomass carbon fibers derived from corncobs and ramie fibers, showing the specific capacity of 606 and 489 mAh·g−1 in lithium-ion batteries, respectively [16]. Zhang et al. reported a carbon microtube synthesized via carbonizing poplar catkin. The carbon microtube was composited with sulfur, which could display the specific discharge capacity of 810 mAh·g−1 after 100 cycles at 0.1 C [14]. Through the above, we can find that biomass carbon materials have good application prospects.
Spent coffee grounds is an agricultural waste with a high yield across the globe. It is a promising carbon precursor for producing low-cost activated carbon, and its application in anodes for lithium-ion batteries has been reported in previous study [17].
To the best of our knowledge, little attention has been paid to the feasibility of porous carbon derived from waste coffee grounds to composite with sulfur for Li/S battery cathode application. In this study, waste coffee grounds was selected as a precursor to prepare oxygen and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon (ONPC) as a conducting matrix to host sulfur for the fabrication of cathodes for Li/S batteries. The effects of pore structure and oxygen/nitrogen co-doping on the electrochemical performance of the S/ONPC composite cathodes were investigated systematically.

2. Materials and Methods

The ONPC was prepared by the thermal carbonization of waste coffee grounds. Firstly, waste coffee grounds were ultrasonically cleaned with deionized (DI) water several times and dried at 60 °C under vacuum for 12 h. Then the mixture of the waste coffee grounds and ZnCl2 in the weight ratio of 1:1 was wet ball-milled with a small quantity of DI water at 200 rpm for 3 h. The obtained paste mixture was thoroughly dried at 90 °C for 12 h. After the water had evaporated, the sample was carbonized at 900 °C for 3 h under an Ar flow. Finally, the black ONPC was produced after washing by 0.6 M HCl and DI water alternately and drying in vacuum at 60 °C. The S/ONPC composite was prepared via a solvothermal synthesis method [18]. Firstly, 0.4 g of ONPC powder was ultrasonically dispersed in 1.0 g of S/CS2 solution with 50 wt % S for 2 h. After drying, the resulting black sample was placed in a ceramic boat and calcined at 150 °C for 10 h in a N2 flow to obtain the S/ONPC composite.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to analyze the crystalline structure of the samples via D8 advance (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S4800, Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) mapping was performed by TEM at 160 kV to analyze the elements distribution. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was utilized to analyze the chemical composition via PHI 5000C ESCA System (Ulvac-Phi, Kanagawa, Japan). The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured via Quabrasorb, SI-3MP (Quantachrome Instrument, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, SDT Q-600, TA Instruments-Waters LLC, Newcastle, PA, USA) was carried out from 25 to 700 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1.
For sulfur electrodes, the S/ONPC composite was mixed with acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) solution with a mass ratio of 8:1:1 to obtain a homogeneous slurry. The above slurry was spread on an Al foil current collector and subsequently dried in vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h. Before assembling the cells, the sulfur cathode was cut into disks with a diameter of 12 mm. The active materials loading on each disk was controlled to 2–2.5 mg. The electrolyte was 1 M lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiCF3SO4) in a mixed solution of dimethoxy ethane and 1,3-dioxolane (1:1, v/v). The coin cells (CR2025) were assembled in an Ar-filled glove box (MBraun, Garching, Germany) and aged for 12 h before battery tests. A battery test instrument (LAND CT2001A, Shenglan, Wuhan, China) was used for investigating the cell cyclability at different current densities in the voltage range of 1–3 V vs. Li+/Li. The Versa STAT electrochemical workstation (Princeton, VersaSTAT 4, 50/60 Hz, Ametek, PA, USA) was used to test electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the frequency range of 0.01–100 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a reveals the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of the ONPC and the S/ONPC composite. The ONPC exhibits typical type I isotherms with unapparent hysteresis loop, indicating the micro/mesopore structure of the ONPC [15,19]. Figure 1b presents the pore size distribution (PSD) curves of the ONPC and the S/ONPC composite. From the PSD curve of the ONPC, the micro/mesopore structure is also evident. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas, pore volumes, and the micropore surface areas of the ONPC and the S/ONPC composite are summarized in Table 1. As listed in Table 1, the surface area of ONPC was 1017.5 m2·g−1 with the pore volume of 0.48 cm3·g−1. After the impregnation of sulfur, the surface area of the S/ONPC composite was only 22.4 m2·g−1 with the pore volume of 0.015 cm3·g−1. The significant reduction in surface area and pore volume is mainly ascribed to the encapsulation of a large amount of sulfur in ONPC. In general, the ONPC possesses a large pore volume and abundant specific surface area, which could effectively retard the diffusion of polysulfides and diminish the shuttle effect in the charge/discharge process of an Li/S battery [20,21].
The XPS spectra were used to determine the surface chemistry of the S/ONPC composite. The XPS survey spectra of S/ONPC (Figure 2a) shows five peaks centered at 163.6, 227.6, 286.4, 401.5, and 532.8 eV, which can be assigned to S2p, S2s, C1s, N1s, and O1s, respectively. As shown in high-resolution N1s spectra (Figure 2b), the N1s spectrum can be fitted into two individual peaks with binding energies of 400.9 and 398.1 eV, corresponding to graphitic-N and pyridinic-N [22]. It is reported that the doped nitrogen may enable an improvement of the electric conductibility, the wettability in the electrolytes, and the adsorption of polysulfides on the carbon matrix [11,23]. As for the C1s spectrum of the S/ONPC composite (Figure 2c), three peaks at 288.5, 285.8, and 284.6 eV can be associated to O–C=O, C–N/C–S, and C–C/C–N bonding, suggesting that oxygen-functional groups exist in the S/ONPC composite [24]. According to the report, the existence of oxygen-containing functional groups can favor the binding ability of lithium polysulfides and improve the utilization of active materials, leading to a good cycling ability for Li/S batteries [25]. The S2p binding energy peak of the S/ONPC composite can be separated into three peaks, including the S2p 3/2 peak (163.8 eV), S2p 1/2 peak (164.9 eV), and C–SOx (168.5 eV), as shown in Figure 2d [26]. The XPS results show that the S atoms are chemically bonded to the ONPC, which could effectively immobilize sulfur, inhibit the diffusion of soluble polysulfides, and thus improve the electrochemical performance of the S/ONPC composite.
Figure 3a shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared ONPC and the S/ONPC composite. It can be seen that the ONPC demonstrates two broad peaks located at 23.4° and 43.4°, which are assigned to the (002) and (100) planes of the graphite lattice [27]. The partially graphitized structure can improve the conductivity of the ONPC, thereby favoring the rate ability of the S/ONPC [28]. The S/ONPC composite exhibits a similar XRD pattern to ONPC with no obvious crystalline sulfur peak (JCPDS No. 08-0247) [29], suggesting that the sulfur has an amorphous phase and is homogeneously distributed in the internal pores of ONPC [29]. To illustrate the actual content of sulfur, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the S/ONPC was carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere. Figure 3b shows the TG curve of the S/ONPC composite. It can be seen that the S/ONPC delivers a significant weight loss between 200 and 450 °C due to the evaporation of sulfur, and the actual sulfur content is calculated to be 47.6 wt %. The temperature at which sulfur evaporates is higher than that of the nitrogen undoped carbon/sulfur composites (200–330 °C) reported in previous studies [30], which may arise from the great encapsulation capability of nanoporous properties and the strong interaction between the sulfur and the oxygen/nitrogen atoms.
Figure 4a shows an SEM image of the ONPC with a three-dimensional (3D) multi-channel porous architecture. The interconnected pores of several micrometers are still maintained after hosting sulfur on the ONPC (Figure 4b), which is kinetically favorable for Li-ion/electron transportation contributing to remarkable rate capability as well as cyclability. Figure 4c presents a TEM image of the ONPC, where a meso/microporous structure is evident. These mesopores and micropores are in favor of the uniform dispersion of sulfur. Specifically, amorphous carbon containing partially graphitized carbon can be evidenced by the inset of Figure 4c of the HR-TEM image, which corresponds to the XRD results. Figure 4d reveals the TEM image of the S/ONPC composite, and no crystal sulfur can be observed, indicating the well-embedded sulfur in the composite. The Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) elemental mapping based on a selected area of the TEM image of the S/ONPC can further demonstrate that the sulfur is homogeneously distributed in the composite. In addition, some mesopores still exist after loading sulfur on the ONPC, serving as the transport pathway for Li-ion/electron and withstanding the volume expansion of sulfur during cycling.
Figure 5a displays the charge/discharge profiles of the S/ONPC cathode at a current destiny of 0.2 C. The two evident discharge plateaus were observed around 2.4 and 2.0 V in the first discharge curve, which are associated with the reduction mechanisms of S8 to soluble long-chain lithium polysulfide (Li2Sn, 4 ≤ n ≤ 8) and the decomposition of the lithium polysulfide to form insoluble short-chain lithium polysulfide (Li2Sn, n ˂ 4) [30]. The charge plateaus at 2.4 V in the subsequent charge process, which is associated with the oxidation transformation of Li2S/Li2S2. The first discharge and charge capacities of the S/ONPC composite are 1150 and 1206 mAh·g−1, with an initial coulombic efficiency of 95%. Meanwhile, the second cycles deliver about 1073 mAh·g−1 with no obvious capacity fading, suggesting that the O/N co-doped hierarchical porous carbon frame can actually restrain the dissolution of the lithium polysulfides and minimize the shuttling loss. The S/ONPC composite exhibits a good cycling ability when tested as a cathode against lithium metal at a current destiny of 0.2 C (Figure 5b). After 100 charge/discharge processes, the reversible capacity remains as high as 613 mAh·g−1 with a capacity retention of 57% compare with its second cycle capacity. To evaluated the rate ability, the S/ONPC composite was tested at different current densities ranging from 0.2 to 1 C under the voltage range of 1–3 V. The trend of the rate capacity can be seen in the Figure 5c; the S/ONPC composite cathode delivers a good capacity retention of 84% after 15 cycles when the current density is restored to 0.2 C after high rate cycling, indicating the structural stability of the S/ONPC composite.
The EIS results of the ONPC and S/ONPC electrodes measured with an amplitude of 10 mV are displayed in Figure 6. The EIS test is able to determine the electrical conductivity of the two electrodes. The Nyquist plots of ONPC and S/ONPC electrodes both consist of typical compressed semicircles attributed to the charge transfer impedance at the high-to-medium frequency region and a sloping line in the low frequency range, which is associated with the Warburg diffusion component [3]. It can be observed that the diameter of the compressed semicircle in the high-to-medium frequency range for the ONPC electrode is smaller than that of the S/ONPC electrode. The impedance of S/ONPC is larger because the conductivity of sulfur is poor. However, the charge transfer resistance of S/ONPC is only 155 Ω, indicating that the network conductive structure of ONPC can make S/ONPC have excellent electrical conductivity.
The excellent cycling performance and rate ability of the S/ONPC composite can be related to the good conductivity of the O/N co-doped carbon frame, the adequate sulfur content, and the hierarchical porous structure. Firstly, the good conductivity of ONPC can support the fast transport of electrons into the sulfur or polysulfides and enhance the active materials utilization in the cathode. Secondly, the existence of the O/N-doped functional groups results in the good interfacial adhesion between the active materials and the electrolyte, and restrains active sulfur material loss. Moreover, the hierarchical porous structure of the S/ONPC composite provides moderate to large pore volume and specific surface area, which suppress the composite interface damages and the abuse of volume change during the cycling process.

4. Conclusions

In summary, oxygen and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon (ONPC) has been successfully synthesized from a direct carbonization procedure by using “zero cost” waste coffee grounds as precursors. The as-prepared carbon possesses an abundant surface area of 1017.5 m2·g−1, a high pore volume of 0.48 cm3·g−1, and a meso-/microporous structure, which is appraised as the cathode scaffolds for Li/S batteries. We have demonstrated the effect of porosity and oxygen/nitrogen doping of ONPC on the electrochemical performance of Li/S batteries. In the view of the feasible preparation approach and good electrochemical performance, the novel S/ONPC composite may become a promising cathode material in the research of Li/S batteries.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Program for the Outstanding Talents of Guangdong sailing plan, Human Resources and Social Security of Guangdong Province (201634007); NSFC (Grant No. 51602111); Xijiang R & D Team (Xin Wang), and the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFB0401502); Guangdong Provincial Grant (2015A030310196, 2014B090915005).

Author Contributions

Xin Wang and Yongguang Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Yan Zhao, Li Wang, and Lanyan Huang performed the experiments; Mingliang Jin and Maxim. Yu. Maximov analyzed the data; Yongguang Zhang and Guofu Zhou contributed in the drafting and revision of the manuscript; Xin Wang and Yongguang Zhang supervised the work and finalized the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ji, X.; Lee, K.T.; Nazar, L.F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhou, G.; Wang, D.W.; Li, F.; Hou, P.X.; Yin, L.; Liu, C.; Lu, G.Q.M.; Gentle, I.R.; Cheng, H.M. A flexible nanostructured sulphur-carbon nanotube cathode with high rate performance for Li-S batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Bakenov, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Konarov, A.; Doan, T.N.L.; Malik, M.; Paron, T.; Chen, P. One-step synthesis of branched sulfur/polypyrrole nanocomposite cathode for lithium rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 208, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yin, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Menbayeva, A.; Bakenov, Z.; Wang, X. Well-dispersed sulfur anchored on interconnected polypyrrole nanofiber network as high performance cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Solid State Sci. 2017, 66, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Lu, S.; Wu, X.; Liu, J. Flexible carbon nanotube–grapheme-sulfur composite film- free-standing cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 10288–10294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sohn, H.; Gordin, M.L.; Xu, T.; Chen, S.; Lv, D.; Song, J.; Manivannan, A.; Wang, D. Porous spherical carbon/sulfur nanocomposites by aerosol-assisted synthesis: The effect of pore structure and morphology on their electrochemical performance as lithium/sulfur battery cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7596–7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schuster, J.; He, G.; Mandlmeier, B.; Yim, T.; Lee, K.T.; Bein, T.; Nazar, L.F. Spherical ordered mesoporous carbon nanoparticles with high porosity for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. 2012, 51, 3591–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xi, K.; Cao, S.; Peng, X.; Ducati, C.; Kumar, R.V.; Cheetham, A.K. Carbon with hierarchical pores from carbonized metal-organic frameworks for lithium sulphur batteries. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2192–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ji, L.; Rao, M.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Duan, W.; Guo, J.; Cairns, E.J.; Zhang, Y. Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18522–18525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Yin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Mentbayeva, A.; Umirov, N.; Xie, H.; Bakenov, Z. A free-standing sulfur/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube electrode for high-performance lithium/sulfur batteries. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yu, X.; Zhao, J.; Lv, R.; Liang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Huang, Z.-H.; Shen, W.; Kang, F. Nitrogen-enriched hierarchical porous carbon with enhanced performance in supercapacitors and lithium-sulfur batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 75403–75410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, J.; Su, D.; Zhang, W.; Bao, W.; Wang, G. A nitrogen-sulfur co-doped porous graphene matrix as a sulfur immobilizer for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17381–17393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.; Cai, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Lai, D.; Yao, J. Porous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from silk fibroin protein encapsulating sulfur as a superior cathode material for highperformance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 17791–17797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Konarov, A.; Li, Z.; Chen, P. Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 619, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, K.; Zhao, N.; Lei, S.; Yan, R.; Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Song, Y.; Xu, D.; Guo, Q.; Liu, L. Promising biomass-based activated carbons derived from willow catkins for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 166, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, S.; Guo, Z.; Wang, S.; Feng, C. Biomass carbon micro/nano-structures derived from ramie fibers and corncobs as anode materials for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 379, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ru, H.; Xiang, K.; Zhou, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, X.S.; Chen, H. Bean-dreg-derived carbon materials used as superior anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 222, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, Y.; Li, X.; Aksay, I.A.; Lemmon, J.; Nie, Z.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. Sandwich-type functionalized graphene sheetsulfur nanocomposite for rechargeable lithium batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7660–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yeon, S.H.; Yoon, H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.E.; Lim, S.; Shin, K.H.; Park, H.S.; Jin, C.S.; Ahn, W.; Cheong, H.W.; et al. Enhanced anode performance of micro/meso-porous reduced graphene oxide prepared from carbide-derived carbon for energy storage devices. Carbon 2015, 91, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Bakenov, Z.; Tuiyebayeva, M.; Konarov, A.; Chen, P. Synthesis of hierarchical porous sulfur/polypyrrole/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite cathode for lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, X.; Peng, H. A revolution in electrodes: Recent progress in rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 2015, 11, 1488–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Niu, S.; Lv, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, F.; Tang, L.; He, Y.; Li, B.; Yang, Q.; Kang, F. A carbon sandwich electrode with graphene filling coated by ndoped porous carbon layers for lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20218–20224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. An, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Fei, H.; Xiong, S.; Ji, B.; Feng, J. Ultrafine TiO2 confined in porous-nitrogen-doped carbon from metal-organic frameworks for high-performance lithium sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12400–12407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shan, H.; Li, X.; Cui, Y.; Xiong, D.; Yan, B.; Li, D.; Lushington, A.; Sun, X. Sulfur/nitrogen dual-doped porous graphene aerogels enhancing anode performance of lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 205, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, G.; Hart, C.J.; Liang, X.; Garsuch, A.; Nazar, L.F. Stable cycling of a scalable grapheme–encapsulated nanocomposite for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10917–10923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, G.; Yin, L.C.; Wang, D.W.; Li, L.; Pei, S.; Gentle, I.R.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.M. Fibrous hybrid of graphene and sulfur nanocrystals for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5367–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, W.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, W.; Wei, S. Hierarchical porous carbon obtained from animal bone and evaluation in electric double-layer capacitors. Carbon 2011, 49, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, T.; Song, J.; Gordin, M.L.; Sohn, H.; Yu, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, D. Mesoporous carbon-carbon nanotube-sulfur composite microspheres for high-areal-capacity lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11355–11362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Lai, Y.; Zhang, K.; Li, J. Improved cyclability of lithium-sulfur battery cathode using encapsulated sulfur in hollow carbon nanofiber@nitrogen-doped porous carbon core-shell composite. Carbon 2014, 78, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, M.; Carter, R.; Douglas, A.; Oakes, L.; Pint, C.L. Sulfur vapor-infiltrated 3d carbon nanotube foam for binder-free high areal capacity lithium-sulfur battery composite cathodes. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4877–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (a) and size distribution (b) of the ONPC and S/ONPC composite.
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (a) and size distribution (b) of the ONPC and S/ONPC composite.
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g001
Figure 2. (a) XPS spectra of S/ONPC composite, (b) N1s XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite, (c) C1s XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite, (d) S2p XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite.
Figure 2. (a) XPS spectra of S/ONPC composite, (b) N1s XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite, (c) C1s XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite, (d) S2p XPS spectrum of the S/ONPC composite.
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g002aNanomaterials 07 00402 g002b
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the ONPC and the S/ONPC composite (a); Thermogravimetric (TG) curve of the S/ONPC composite (b).
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the ONPC and the S/ONPC composite (a); Thermogravimetric (TG) curve of the S/ONPC composite (b).
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of ONPC (a) and S/ONPC (b), and TEM images of ONPC (c) and S/ONPC (d) including their high magnified views.
Figure 4. SEM images of ONPC (a) and S/ONPC (b), and TEM images of ONPC (c) and S/ONPC (d) including their high magnified views.
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g004
Figure 5. (a) The galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite, (b) Cycle performance of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite for 100 cycles at 0.2 C, (c) Rate capability of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite.
Figure 5. (a) The galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite, (b) Cycle performance of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite for 100 cycles at 0.2 C, (c) Rate capability of a lithium cell with the S/ONPC composite.
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g005
Figure 6. EIS results of ONPC and S/ONPC electrodes.
Figure 6. EIS results of ONPC and S/ONPC electrodes.
Nanomaterials 07 00402 g006
Table 1. BET results (surface area and pore volume) for the ONPC and S/ONPC.
Table 1. BET results (surface area and pore volume) for the ONPC and S/ONPC.
MaterialsSBET (m2·g−1)Smicro (m2·g−1)Vtot (cm3·g−1)Vmicro (cm3·g−1)
ONPC1017.5477.30.480.21
S/ONPC22.43.60.0150.003
SBET = Specific surface area calculated by using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. Smicro = micropore surface area calculated by the t-plot method. Vtot = total pore volume calculated by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. Vmicro = micropore volume calculated by the t-plot method.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, L.; Maximov, M.Y.; Jin, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, G. Biomass-Derived Oxygen and Nitrogen Co-Doped Porous Carbon with Hierarchical Architecture as Sulfur Hosts for High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7110402

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Wang L, Huang L, Maximov MY, Jin M, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhou G. Biomass-Derived Oxygen and Nitrogen Co-Doped Porous Carbon with Hierarchical Architecture as Sulfur Hosts for High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(11):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7110402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yan, Li Wang, Lanyan Huang, Maxim. Yu. Maximov, Mingliang Jin, Yongguang Zhang, Xin Wang, and Guofu Zhou. 2017. "Biomass-Derived Oxygen and Nitrogen Co-Doped Porous Carbon with Hierarchical Architecture as Sulfur Hosts for High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries" Nanomaterials 7, no. 11: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7110402

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop