Next Article in Journal
Nanoemulsified D-Limonene Reduces the Heat Resistance of Salmonella Senftenberg over 50 Times
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Enhanced Photoreductive Degradation of Polybromodiphenyl Ethers with g-C3N4/TiO2 under Visible Light Irradiation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Three-Dimensional BiOI/BiOX (X = Cl or Br) Nanohybrids for Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Graphene-Based Ternary Composites for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution and Pollutants Degradation

1
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Perth, WA 6027, Australia
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Renai College of Tianjin University, Tianjin 301636, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(3), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030062
Submission received: 26 January 2017 / Revised: 6 March 2017 / Accepted: 8 March 2017 / Published: 15 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoscale in Photocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Photocatalysis have attracted great attention due to their useful applications for sustainable hydrogen evolution and pollutants degradation. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) such as MoS2 and WS2 have exhibited great potential as cocatalysts to increase the photo-activity of some semiconductors. By combination with graphene (GR), enhanced cocatalysts of TMD/GR hybrids could be synthesized. GR here can act as a conductive electron channel for the transport of the photogenerated electrons, while the TMDs nanosheets in the hybrids can collect electrons and act as active sites for photocatalytic reactions. This mini review will focus on the application of TMD/GR hybrids as cocatalysts for semiconductors in photocatalytic reactions, by which we hope to provide enriched information of TMD/GR as a platform to develop more efficient photocatalysts for solar energy utilization.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of the photocatalytic splitting of water on TiO2 electrodes by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [1], photocatalysis has attracted great attention for eliminating hazardous pollutants and generating sustainable energy [2]. Semiconductors such as TiO2, ZnO, CdS, etc. can act as photocatalysts for the utilization of solar energy [3]. They are however limited in real application by the rapid electron–hole recombination [4,5,6]. Noble metal cocatalysts are usually loaded to enhance the activity of the semiconductor photocatalysts [7]. However, these metals are rare and expensive to apply [8]. The development of highly active and low cost cocatalysts remains a great challenge in the field of photocatalysis.
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) such as MoS2 and WS2 have exhibited excellent activities as cocatalysts for the modification of semiconductors [8,9]. The properties of TMDs can be tailored according to their crystalline structure and the number and stacking sequence of their nanosheets [10,11,12,13,14]. By loading TMDs cocatalysts, semiconductor–semiconductor or metal–semiconductor junctions will form, and more interfaces could be created [15,16]. Charge separation and electron transport can therefore be enhanced, leading to the activity improvement [15]. Furthermore, many kinds of TMDs with different phases were reported to be active for the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which stems from their exposed and under-coordinated edge sites [17,18,19]. Therefore, loading the TMDs as cocatalysts for semiconductors could also lower the activation energy and overpotential for photocatalytic H2 evolution [8]. On the other hand, TMDs have special 2D layered structure, and can be used as effective supports for anchor of semiconductor nanoparticles, which could reduce the mobility, provide more active sites, and avoid coalescence and agglomeration of the semiconductors [20,21,22]. Based on the above analysis, TMDs have shown great potential as substitute of noble metal cocatalysts for the synthesis of composite photocatalysts with high activity [8].
Graphene (GR) consists of a single layer and sp2-hybridized carbon lattice with excellent electrical (200,000 cm2·V−1·s−1), thermal, and mechanical properties, and is a novel material that has emerged as a rapidly rising star in the field of material science [23]. The photocatalytic activity of semiconductors can be greatly increased by loading GR as cocatalyst, mainly owing to the effective separation of the electron–hole pairs [24,25].
By combining GR with TMDs, new hybrid cocatalysts could be synthesized with 2D layered structures. GR here can transport the photogenerated electrons rapidly, and the TMDs in the hybrids can accept electrons and act as active sites for H2 evolution or radicals generation. This mini review will focus on the synthesis methods of TMD/GR-based photocatalysts and their applications for photocatalytic H2 evolution and organic pollutants degradation. Based on this review, we hope to offer enriched information of TMD/GR as a platform to fabricate more efficient photocatalysts for solar energy utilization.

2. TMD/GR-Based Composites for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution

TiO2 is the most frequently used semiconductor for photocatalytic H2 evolution, which can only absorb and utilize UV light due to its large band gap (3.2 eV) [26]. Xiang et al. synthesized ternary composites consisting of TiO2 nanoparticles grown on the MoS2/GR hybrid as enhanced photocatalysts for H2 evolution (Figure 1) [25]. The TiO2-MoS2/GR composites were prepared using a two-step hydrothermal method. As shown in Figure 1, the TiO2 nanoparticles were supported on the 2D MoS2/GR hybrid uniformly with intimate contact. The electrons can therefore transfer rapidly from TiO2 to the MoS2/GR cocatalyst, and the charge recombination can therefore be suppressed. The activity of the ternary composites can be tuned by adjusting the GR percentage of MoS2/GR cocatalysts and the percentage of the MoS2/GR hybrid for the ternary photocatalysts. The optimized TiO2-MoS2/GR composite could obtain a high H2 evolution rate of 165.3 μmol·h−1 and a quantum efficiency of 9.7% at 365 nm.
CdS has a narrow bandgap of 2.3 eV, which is effective for capturing the visible light [36]. Chang et al. used nanosized GR as support for the growth of MoS2; 3D hierarchical CdS-MoS2/GR composites with diameters of 100–300 nm were then synthesized with the help of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Figure 2) [27]. As shown in Figure 2e, the MoS2 sheets on nanosized GR have many defect sites and disordered structures due to the low synthesis temperature, CdS nanoparticles can then firmly anchor on these defects and vacancies (Figure 2g–j). After optimizing each component proportion, the highest H2 evolution rate could be as large as 1.8 mmol/h with an apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 28.1% at 420 nm, which was even higher than that of Pt/CdS. They thought that the activities of S atoms in the MoS2 molecules were different with respect to their different coordination (Figure 3a). Unsaturated S atoms are active for H+ adsorption and reduction (Figure 3b), while the saturated S atoms on the basal plane are inert. The nanosized few-layer MoS2 supported on GR has more exposed edges and unsaturated active S atoms, which is therefore a promising cocatalyst for the activity enhancement of CdS.
Xiang et al. synthesized CdS-WS2/GR ternary composites for photocatalytic H2 evolution [32]. The optimized WS2/GR content in the ternary CdS-WS2/GR composites was determined to be 4.2 wt %. Using 0.35 M Na2S/0.25 M Na2SO3 as sacrificial agent, a satisfactory H2 evolution rate of 1.842 mmol·h−1·g−1 could be achieved with an apparent quantum efficiency of 21.2% at 420 nm. The transient photocurrent response was also enhanced by loading the WS2/GR cocatalyst, which was promising evidence for the improved charge transport (Figure 4). By loading WS2/GR cocatalyst, more active sites will be introduced, and charge separation and interfacial charge transfer could be enhanced, thus leading to the greatly increased photo-activity.
During the photocatalytic H2 evolution process, the metal oxide can absorb a photon to create an electron–hole pair with irradiation (Figure 5a,c). Both of the graphene/ graphene•− redox potential and conduction band (CB) of quantum-sized MoS2 are slightly lower than the CB of anatase TiO2 or CdS (Figure 4b,d). Part of the excited electrons can then directly transfer to active sites of MoS2, and another part transfer to active sites of MoS2 via graphene conducting channel. Graphene here can act as a “highway” for the rapid transport of photo-generated electrons, while MoS2 nanosheets can accept electrons and act as active sites for H2 evolution. Therefore, using MoS2/GR hybrid as cocatalyst, suppression of charge recombination, improvement of interfacial charge transfer, and an increase in the number of active sites could be achieved, thus leading to the enhanced photo-activity.
It has been reported that sub-10 nm rutile TiO2 with 1 wt % Pt doping exhibited state-of-the-art activity among TiO2-based composites for photocatalytic water splitting. The hydrogen evolution rate could be achieved to 932 mmol·h−1·g−1 under visible light (>400 nm) and 1954 mmol·h−1·g−1 under simulated solar light [37]. By loading 0.30 wt % of Pt and 0.13 wt % of PdS as cocatalysts on CdS, another CdS-based state-of-the-art material could be synthesized with a quantum efficiency (QE) up to 93% and a hydrogen evolution rate of 8.77 mmol·h−1 [38]. Compared to these state-of-the-art materials, the activities of TMD/GR modified semiconductors are relatively weak, with lower H2 evolution rates and QEs. Although the TMD/GR cocatalysts are more cost effective, deep studies are still needed to obtain higher efficiencies for real application.

3. TMD/GR-Based Photocatalysts for Pollutants Degradation

Photocatalysis is also an attractive technology for the degradation of pollutants in water using solar energy [39]. Han et al. used a hydrothermal method to combine the exfoliated MoS2, GR, and TiO2 P25 together [40]. The obtained composite was a novel graphene-based three-dimensional (3D) aerogel embedded with TiO2 particles and MoS2 nanosheets (Figure 6). Porous structure could be observed with pore sizes of about several micrometers (Figure 6b). The Nyquist plots of the samples were also tested, and the final 3D GR–MoS2–TiO2 composite had the smallest cure radius (Figure 7), indicating that the addition of 3D graphene aerogel can decrease the solid state interface layer resistance and the charge transfer resistance. During the application test, the final composite had better adsorption ability for methyl orange (MO) due to the maximization of accessible sites of the 3D interconnected networks (Figure 8a). The 3D photocatalyst was proved to be very effective for the photocatalytic degradation of MO, and nearly no MO was left after 15 min irradiation (Figure 8b).
Gao et al. fabricated a TiO2-MoS2/GR composite under atmospheric pressure using a simple one-pot solvothermal method [34]. Na2MoO4 and thiocarbamide were used as precursors for MoS2, and mixed solvent of (dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/deionized (DI) H2O) was used as reaction media. Under the above conditions, MoS2 quantum dots (QDs) with (100) face exposed could be generated on the surface of TiO2 and GR (Figure 9). Attributed to the small diameter of the MoS2 QDs, more active edge could be created, thus leading to the enhanced photocatalytic activity.
Peng et al. synthesized Ag3PO4-MoS2/GR via a simple two-step hydrothermal process [33]. The composite was found to be an effective catalyst for the photo-decomposition of 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) under simulated solar light and visible light (λ > 420 nm). They described the major reaction steps involved in this photocatalytic process as follows:
Ag3PO4 + hv → Ag3PO4 (e + h+)
Ag3PO4 (e) + MoS2/GR → Ag3PO4 + MoS2/GR (e)
MoS2/GR (e) + O2 → MoS2/GR + O2
Ag3PO4 (h+) + DCP → CO2 + H2O + other products
Ag3PO4 (h+) + OH → Ag3PO4 + ·OH
·OH + DCP → CO2 + H2O + other products
As shown in the mechanism, electrons and holes could be separated with irradiation (1). The holes could oxidize the DCP molecules adsorbed on the catalyst surface directly (4). They could also react with water (or hydroxyl) to form hydroxyl free radicals (·OH), which are strong oxidants for DCP decomposition (5). The MoS2/GR cocatalyst here could act as electron collectors to facilitate the interfacial electron transfer and charge separation. In addition, the MoS2/GR cocatalyst could also provide more active sites and allow for the activation of dissolved O2 for organic degradation [33].
Using CoS2/GR as cocatalyst, Zhu et al. supported TiO2 nanoparticles on its surface using a facile sonochemical and hydrothermal method [35]. Their photo-activity was then evaluated for the degradation of methylene blue (MB) and Texbrite BA-L (TBA) under visible light. Enhanced activity was obtained due to the synergetic effect between TiO2 and the CoS2/GR cocatalyst. The recent progress of TMD/GR based photocatalysts for H2 evolution and pollutants degradation are summarized and shown in Table 1 for a easier perusal.

4. Conclusions and Perspective

This mini review focused on the recent developments of the TMD/GR-based composites, including the synthesis methods, the application in photocatalytic H2 evolution, and the application for organic pollutants degradation. By combination with GR, the TMD/GR hybrids were more effective as cocatalysts for the modification of semiconductors. GR here can act as a conductive electron transport “highway” for the transport of the photogenerated electrons, and the TMDs nanosheets in the hybrids can accept electrons and act as active sites for photocatalytic reactions. Although deep research is still needed for real application, TMD/GR cocatalysts have shown great potential as a platform to fabricate more efficient photocatalysts for solar energy utilization.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the project No. 21506158 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Inoue, T.; Fujishima, A.; Konishi, S.; Honda, K. Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Suspensions of Semiconductor Powders. Nature 1979, 277, 637–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rajeshwar, K.; De Tacconi, N.R. Solution Combustion Synthesis of Oxide Semiconductors for Solar Energy Conversion and Environmental Remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 7, 1984–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kudo, A.; Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous Photocatalyst Materials for Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 1, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Perera, S.D.; Mariano, R.G.; Vu, K.; Nour, N.; Seitz, O.; Chabal, Y.; Balkus, K.J. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Graphene-TiO2 Nanotube Composites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Acs. Catal. 2012, 6, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, P.; Wei, Z.; Wu, T.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y.D. Au-Zno Hybrid Nanopyramids and Their Photocatalytic Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 15, 5660–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.X.; Zhang, W.D. MoS2/CdS Heterojunction with High Photoelectrochemical Activity for H2 Evolution under Visible Light: The Role of MoS2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 25, 12949–12957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zou, X.X.; Zhang, Y. Noble Metal-Free Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 15, 5148–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lu, Q.P.; Yu, Y.F.; Ma, Q.L.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. 2D Transition-Metal-Dichalcogenide-Nanosheet-Based Composites for Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Adv. Mater. 2016, 10, 1917–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chang, K.; Hai, X.; Ye, J.H. Transition Metal Disulfides as Noble-Metal-Alternative Co-Catalysts for Solar Hydrogen Production. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhandavat, R.; David, L.; Singh, G. Synthesis of Surface-Functionalized WS2 nanosheets and Performance as Li-Ion Battery Anodes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 11, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gong, Q.F.; Cheng, L.; Liu, C.H.; Zhang, M.; Feng, Q.L.; Ye, H.L.; Zeng, M.; Xie, L.M.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.G. Ultrathin MoS2(1–x)Se2x alloy Nanoflakes for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2015, 4, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prabakaran, A.; Dillon, F.; Melbourne, J.; Jones, L.; Nicholls, R.J.; Holdway, P.; Britton, J.; Koos, A.A.; Crossley, A.; Nellist, P.D.; et al. WS2 2D Nanosheets in 3D Nanoflowers. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2014, 82, 12360–12362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, S.C.; Benck, J.D.; Tsai, C.; Park, J.; Koh, A.L.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Sinclair, R. Chemical and Phase Evolution of Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Production. ACS NANO 2016, 1, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baldovi, H.G.; Latorre-Sanchez, M.; Esteve-Adell, I.; Khan, A.; Asiri, A.M.; Kosa, S.A.; Garcia, H. Generation of MoS2 Quantum Dots by Laser Ablation of MoS2 Particles in Suspension and Their Photocatalytic Activity for H2 Generation. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2016, 8, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zong, X.; Yan, H.J.; Wu, G.P.; Ma, G.J.; Wen, F.Y.; Wang, L.; Li, C. Enhancement of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution on CdS by Loading MoS2 as Cocatalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 23, 7176–7177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bai, S.; Wang, L.M.; Chen, X.Y.; Du, J.T.; Xiong, Y.J. Chemically exfoliated metallic MoS2 nanosheets: A promising supporting Co-catalyst for enhancing the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanocrystals. Nano Res. 2015, 1, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Morales-Guio, C.G.; Stern, L.A.; Hu, X.L. Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 18, 6555–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Morales-Guio, C.G.; Hu, X.L. Amorphous molybdenum sulfides as hydrogen evolution catalysts. Accounts Chem. Res. 2014, 8, 2671–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yan, Y.; Xia, B.Y.; Xu, Z.C.; Wang, X. Recent development of molybdenum sulfides as advanced electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Acs Catal. 2014, 6, 1693–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.P.; Feng, X.L. Construction of two-dimensional MoS2/CdS p-n nanohybrids for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2014, 34, 10632–10635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhu, Y.Y.; Ling, Q.; Liu, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.F. Photocatalytic H2 evolution on MoS2-TiO2 catalysts synthesized via mechanochemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 2, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vattikuti, S.P.; Byon, C.; Reddy, C.V.; Ravikumar, R.V. Improved photocatalytic activity of MoS2 nanosheets decorated with SnO2 nanoparticles. Rsc Adv. 2015, 105, 86675–86684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 5696, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peng, W.C.; Li, X.Y. Synthesis of a sulfur-graphene composite as an enhanced metal-free photocatalyst. Nano Res. 2013, 4, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xiang, Q.J.; Yu, J.G.; Jaroniec, M. Synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 15, 6575–6578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, C.; Li, F.; Lu, G.Q.; Cheng, H.-M. Synergistic effects of B/N doping on the visible-light photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2008, 24, 4516–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chang, K.; Mei, Z.W.; Wang, T.; Kang, Q.; Ouyang, S.X.; Ye, J.H. MoS2/graphene cocatalyst for efficient photocatalytic h2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Acs NANO 2014, 7, 7078–7087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jia, T.T.; Kolpin, A.; Ma, C.S.; Chan, R.C.T.; Kwok, W.M.; Tsang, S.C.E. A Graphene dispersed CdS-MoS2 nanocrystal ensemble for cooperative photocatalytic hydrogen production from water. Chem. Commun. 2014, 10, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Y.X.; Wang, H.; Peng, S.Q. Tunable Photodeposition of MoS2 onto a Composite of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Cds for Synergic Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 34, 19842–19848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, B.L.; Lin, B.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, P.; Yao, Q.R.; Chen, Y.L.; Gao, B.F. Enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution on Zns loaded with graphene and MoS2 nanosheets as cocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 11, 3819–3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lang, D.; Shen, T.T.; Xiang, Q.J. Roles of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts in the enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production activity of multiarmed CdS nanorods. Chemcatchem 2015, 6, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiang, Q.J.; Cheng, F.Y.; Lang, D. Hierarchical layered WS2/graphene-modified CdS nanorods for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chemsuschem 2016, 9, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peng, W.C.; Wang, X.; Li, X.Y. The synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene on Ag3PO4 for its ultra-enhanced photocatalytic activity in phenol degradation under visible light. Nanoscale 2014, 14, 8311–8317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gao, W.Y.; Wang, M.Q.; Ran, C.X.; Li, L. Facile one-pot synthesis of MoS2 quantum dots-graphene-TiO2 composites for highly enhanced photocatalytic properties. Chem. Commun. 2015, 9, 1709–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, L.; Jo, S.B.; Ye, S.; Ullah, K.; Meng, Z.D.; Oh, W.C. A Green and direct synthesis of photosensitized CoS2-graphene/TiO2 hybrid with high photocatalytic performance. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 22, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, G.M.; Yang, X.Y.; Qian, F.; Zhang, J.Z.; Li, Y. Double-sided cds and cdse quantum dot co-sensitized ZnO nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. NANO Lett. 2010, 3, 1088–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, L.; Yan, J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Zhang, J.; Gong, J.; Guan, N. Sub-10 nm rutile titanium dioxide nanoparticles for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yan, H.; Yang, J.; Ma, G.; Wu, G.; Zong, X.; Lei, Z.; Shi, J.; Li, C. Visible-light-driven hydrogen production with extremely high quantum efficiency on Pt-PdS/CdS photocatalyst. J. Catal. 2009, 2, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.Y.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 1, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, W.J.; Zang, C.; Huang, Z.Y.; Zhang, H.; Ren, L.; Qi, X.; Zhong, J.X. Enhanced photocatalytic activities of three-dimensional graphene-based aerogel embedding TiO2 nanoparticles and loading MoS2 nanosheets as Co-catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 34, 19502–19512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphology characterization of the TiO2-MoS2/graphene (GR) composite. (a,b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and (c,d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the TiO2-MoS2/GR composite (reprinted from [25] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012).
Figure 1. Morphology characterization of the TiO2-MoS2/graphene (GR) composite. (a,b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and (c,d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the TiO2-MoS2/GR composite (reprinted from [25] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of growth mechanism of MoS2/GR-CdS composites; TEM images of (b) graphene oxide (GO) and (c) nanosized graphene (GR); (d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and (e) TEM images of as-prepared MoS2/GR composite; the inset of (e) is the HRTEM image of MoS2/GR composite; (f and g) SEM images of CdS-MoS2/GR composites; (h) TEM and (i and j) HRTEM images of the CdS-MoS2/GR composite (reprinted from [27] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014).
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of growth mechanism of MoS2/GR-CdS composites; TEM images of (b) graphene oxide (GO) and (c) nanosized graphene (GR); (d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and (e) TEM images of as-prepared MoS2/GR composite; the inset of (e) is the HRTEM image of MoS2/GR composite; (f and g) SEM images of CdS-MoS2/GR composites; (h) TEM and (i and j) HRTEM images of the CdS-MoS2/GR composite (reprinted from [27] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of the microstructure of MoS2 and (b) its cocatalytic mechanism of H2 generation in lactic acid solution (reprinted from [27] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014).
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of the microstructure of MoS2 and (b) its cocatalytic mechanism of H2 generation in lactic acid solution (reprinted from [27] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g003
Figure 4. Transient photocurrent responses of pure CdS and CdS-WS2/GR composite in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution under visible-light irradiation at 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl (reprinted from [32] with permission, Copyright Wiley-VCH, 2016).
Figure 4. Transient photocurrent responses of pure CdS and CdS-WS2/GR composite in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution under visible-light irradiation at 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl (reprinted from [32] with permission, Copyright Wiley-VCH, 2016).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of (a) the charge transfer in TiO2-MoS2/GR composites for photocatalytic H2 evolution; and (b) the potential and band positions in the TiO2/MoS2/graphene system (reprinted from [25] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012); (c) Graphene-supported CdS and MoS2 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; (d) The band positions for the CdS–graphene–MoS2 system (reprinted from [28] with permission, Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2014). (SHE: Standard hydrogen electrode; NHE: Normal hydrogen electrode).
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of (a) the charge transfer in TiO2-MoS2/GR composites for photocatalytic H2 evolution; and (b) the potential and band positions in the TiO2/MoS2/graphene system (reprinted from [25] with permission, Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012); (c) Graphene-supported CdS and MoS2 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; (d) The band positions for the CdS–graphene–MoS2 system (reprinted from [28] with permission, Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2014). (SHE: Standard hydrogen electrode; NHE: Normal hydrogen electrode).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g005
Figure 6. (a,b) SEM images of the as-prepared MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel; the inset image is a digital photo of the free-standing MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel. (c,d) TEM images and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (insert) pattern of the as-prepared MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Figure 6. (a,b) SEM images of the as-prepared MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel; the inset image is a digital photo of the free-standing MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel. (c,d) TEM images and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (insert) pattern of the as-prepared MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g006
Figure 7. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots of MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, and P25 nanoparticles in sulfide-sulfite electrolyte and under UV irradiation (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Figure 7. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots of MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, and P25 nanoparticles in sulfide-sulfite electrolyte and under UV irradiation (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g007
Figure 8. (a) Bar plot showing the remaining methyl orange (MO) in solution after reaching the adsorption equilibrium in the dark over MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, MoS2/GR, and P25; (b) photo-degradation of MO by MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, MoS2/GR, and P25 with a reaction time of 30 min under UV irradiation (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Figure 8. (a) Bar plot showing the remaining methyl orange (MO) in solution after reaching the adsorption equilibrium in the dark over MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, MoS2/GR, and P25; (b) photo-degradation of MO by MoS2/P25/GR-aerogel, GR/P25/MoS2-composite, P25/GR, MoS2/P25, MoS2/GR, and P25 with a reaction time of 30 min under UV irradiation (reprinted from [40] with permission, Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g008
Figure 9. TEM and HRTEM images of the sample (a,b) TiO2-MoS2/GR and (c,d) MoS2–GR (reprinted from [34] with permission, Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015). QD: quantum dot.
Figure 9. TEM and HRTEM images of the sample (a,b) TiO2-MoS2/GR and (c,d) MoS2–GR (reprinted from [34] with permission, Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015). QD: quantum dot.
Nanomaterials 07 00062 g009
Table 1. Summary of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD)/GR based photocatalysts and their applications.
Table 1. Summary of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD)/GR based photocatalysts and their applications.
CatalystSynthesis MethodApplicationLight SourceActivityMorphologyRef.
TiO2-MoS2/GRTwo-step hydrothermalH2 generation in 25% (v/v) ethanol/water350 W Xe arc lamp
20 mW/cm−2
λ = 365 nm
165.3 μmol·h−1
a QE: 9.7%
at 365 nm
Particles/sheets[25]
CdS-MoS2/GRHydrothermalH2 generation in 20 vol % lactic solution300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm)1.8 mmol/h
QE: 28.1%
at 420 nm
Particles/sheets[27]
CdS-MoS2/GRSonication assisted post loadingH2 generation in 10 vol % lactic acid500 W UV-vis lamp3.067 mL·h−1Particles/sheets[28]
CdS-MoS2/GRIn-situ
photo deposition
H2 generation in 10 vol % lactic acid350 W Xe lamp
λ ≥ 420 nm
34 mW/cm2
99 μmol·h−1
QE: 9.8%
at 420 nm
Particles/sheets[29]
ZnS-MoS2/GROne-pot hydrothermalH2 generation in 0.005 M Na2S and 0.005 M Na2SO3300 W Xe lamp
125 mW/cm2
2258 μmol·h−1·g−1Particles/sheets[30]
CdS-MoS2/GRTwo-step solvothermalH2 generation in 10 vol % lactic acid350 W xenon arc lamp
(λ ≥ 420 nm)
621.3 μmol·h−1
54.4%
at 420 nm
Nanorods /sheets[31]
CdS-WS2/GRSolvothermalH2 generation in 0.35 M Na2S and 0.25 M Na2SO3500 W Xeno arc Lamp
λ > 420 nm
1842 μmol·h−1·g−1
21.2% at 420 nm
Nanosheets/nanorods[32]
Ag3PO4-MoS2/GRHydrothermal-deposition2,4-Dichlorophenol degradation 20 mg·L−1500 W xenon lamp
(λ > 420 nm)
b DP of >99% in 20 min 25 times higher than N-TiO2Sub-microcrystal/sheets[33]
TiO2-MoS2/GROne-pot solvothermalRhB degradation 10 mg·L−1150 W Xe lampDP of 80% in 80 min
3.9 times higher than TiO2 P25
Sheets/Particles[34]
TiO2-CoS2/GRSonochemical and hydrothermal methodMB degradation 2.0 × 10−5 mol/L8 W, halogen lamp
400–790 nm.
DP of >90% in 90 minSheets/Particles[35]
a QE: Quantum efficiency; b DP: Degradation percentage.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Sun, H.; Peng, W. 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Graphene-Based Ternary Composites for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution and Pollutants Degradation. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030062

AMA Style

Chen Y, Sun H, Peng W. 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Graphene-Based Ternary Composites for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution and Pollutants Degradation. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(3):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ying, Hongqi Sun, and Wenchao Peng. 2017. "2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Graphene-Based Ternary Composites for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution and Pollutants Degradation" Nanomaterials 7, no. 3: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop