Next Article in Journal
Polydopamine Nanoparticles for Combined Chemo- and Photothermal Cancer Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
A Simple and Highly Sensitive Thymine Sensor for Mercury Ion Detection Based on Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and the Mechanism Study
Previous Article in Journal
I-V and C-V Characterization of a High-Responsivity Graphene/Silicon Photodiode with Embedded MOS Capacitor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Sensitive Magnetic-SERS Dual-Function Silica Nanoprobes for Effective On-Site Organic Chemical Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controllable Charge Transfer in Ag-TiO2 Composite Structure for SERS Application

1
Key Laboratory of Functional Materials Physics and Chemistry, Jilin Normal University, Ministry of Education, Siping 136000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Excited State Physics, Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(7), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7070159
Submission received: 3 May 2017 / Revised: 1 June 2017 / Accepted: 16 June 2017 / Published: 28 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for SERS Applications)

Abstract

:
The nanocaps array of TiO2/Ag bilayer with different Ag thicknesses and co-sputtering TiO2-Ag monolayer with different TiO2 contents were fabricated on a two-dimensional colloidal array substrate for the investigation of Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) properties. For the TiO2/Ag bilayer, when the Ag thickness increased, SERS intensity decreased. Meanwhile, a significant enhancement was observed when the sublayer Ag was 10 nm compared to the pure Ag monolayer, which was ascribed to the metal-semiconductor synergistic effect that electromagnetic mechanism (EM) provided by roughness surface and charge-transfer (CT) enhancement mechanism from TiO2-Ag composite components. In comparison to the TiO2/Ag bilayer, the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag monolayer decreased the aggregation of Ag particles and led to the formation of small Ag particles, which showed that TiO2 could effectively inhibit the aggregation and growth of Ag nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) was initially observed by Fleischmann in 1974, and was further developed by Jeanmaire and Van Duyne in 1977 [1,2]. Nowadays, the intensity of SERS signal is greatly improved, and the enhancement factor can be as high as 1014 so that single molecule detection can be realized by SERS technology. SERS has been widely used in many fields, such as catalytic, biological sensing, medical detection, trace analysis, and so on [3,4,5,6]. In order to describe the enhancement mechanism in SERS, two main contributions from the electromagnetic mechanism (EM) and the charge-transfer mechanism (CT) are discussed [2,7].
The development of SERS technology and the expansion of the application field depends on the excellent performance of the substrate materials. With the discovery of metallic nanoparticles possessing SERS enhancement properties, noble metals (e.g., Ag, Au) and transition metals (e.g., Pt, Pd) have become the most studied classes of SERS-active substrates [8,9,10]. Moreover, semiconductor materials (ZnO and TiO2) also display plasmon resonance within visible and NIR frequencies [11,12]. In recent years, the composite substrate of noble metals and semiconductor functional materials have attracted researchers’ interests because their combination can not only improve the property of SERS substrates, but can also extend SERS substrates’ applications, in contrast to substrates consisting of a single component [13,14,15,16].
Compared with other noble metals, Ag material is widely used in SERS substrates because of its high surface plasmon resonance in the visible region that can provide great contributions to the electromagnetic field and high SERS activity. The semiconductor material TiO2 with a wide band gap is usually selected in many important applications areas, such as catalytic [17,18,19,20] and antimicrobial [21,22,23] applications, due to its merits including low cost, high stability, and bio-compatibility. Most SERS substrates with Ag and TiO2 composite components are prepared by a chemical method, such as the sol-gel method, chemical vapor deposition, and so on. However, in order to obtain a SERS substrate comprising a nanoarray with a large area and high ordered structures, a physical preparation process with simple steps is a good choice [24,25]. One such simple process is magnetron sputtering. Films prepared by magnetron sputtering have good stability and uniformity. In this paper, different nanostructure arrays consisting of TiO2 and Ag composites are fabricated by the magnetron sputtering system. In comparison to the pure Ag array, the properties of the nanostructure array for a TiO2/Ag bilayer and a TiO2-Ag monolayer deposited on a two-dimensional colloidal array are investigated by 4-Amino-thiophenol (PATP) as the probing molecule.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preparation and Characterization of the Nano Composite Structure

We prepared the polystyrene (PS) colloidal spheres Arrays with size of 200 nm by the self-assembly technique. The Si wafer was immersed in a mixed solution containing NH4OH, H2O2, and H2O at a volume ratio of 1:2:6, and was heated at 300 °C for 5-10 min. Then, they were ultrasonically cleaned for 10–15 min in deionized water and alcohol alternately. This cleaning step was repeated three times. The Si wafer was soaked in 2% sodium sulfate solution for 24 h to obtain a hydrophilic substrate surface. Alcohol and 200 nm polystyrene were mixed with a volume ratio of 1:1. Subsequently, we dropped the mixture on the Si wafer, which was kept in a sodium dodecyl sulfate solution and slowly immersed into a glass vessel. The PS particles formed unordered monolayer films on the water surface. Finally, after absorbing excess water by filter paper and being dried completely in air by static natural evaporation, two-dimensional polystyrene beads in closely-packed monolayer ordered arrays formed on the surface of the silicon substrate.
Semiconductor TiO2 and metal Ag targets were deposited onto 200-nm PS colloidal spheres in the magnetron sputtering system to fabricate the nanocap arrays of the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer with different Ag thicknesses and the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag (10 nm) monolayer. The fabrication process is given in Figure 1. For comparison, TiO2 and Ag were alternatively sputtered and co-sputtered to form bilayer and monolayer nanocap arrays, respectively. The TiO2 was amorphous in the bilayer and monolayer, as shown in Figure S1. The simple and facile magnetron sputtering technology was chosen to fabricate the nanostructure array, which avoids the necessity of sophisticated steps during fabrication.
Figure 2a–d show the SEM images for the bilayer TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag t nm (t = 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm) on the PS template. The aggregations of particles on the surface of PS became obvious, and surface roughness decreased as the Ag thickness increased from 10 nm to 40 nm. The amplified cross-section images show that the thickness of the films increased gradually and the morphologies changed from spherical to columnar shapes. When the PS colloidal sphere was used as the template, the spherical substrates induced the film to grow in the vertical direction on the sphere surface, and the adjacent nanocaps were connected to each other when the film was very thick. Ag and TiO2 elements were distributed on the surface of the nanocap randomly, and the element analysis mapping of the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm)-coated nanocap surface is shown in Figure S2.

2.2. SERS Study of PS/TiO2/Ag and PS/Ag

Figure 3 shows the SERS spectrum of PATP adsorbed on the PS/TiO2/Ag bilayer from 1 × 10−3 mol/L aqueous solution. For the substrate PS/TiO2/Ag bilayer and PS/Ag monolayer, the relative intensity and the position of Raman peaks are significantly different. In the PS/TiO2/Ag spectra (Figure 3a), PATP molecules exhibit characteristic peaks located at 1008, 1072, 1141, 1188, 1302, 1390, 1440, 1472, and 1577 cm−1. However, PATP molecules on the PS/Ag substrate show the characteristic peaks located at 1008, 1071, 1140, 1182, 1301, 1389, 1439, 1472, and 1577 cm−1 (Figure 3b). Among these, the peaks at around 1072, 1188, and 1472 cm−1 are assigned to the υ(C–S), δ(C–H), and υ(C–C) stretching vibrations, respectively, which are dominated by characteristic a1 vibrational modes [26,27,28]. The δ(C–H) at 1140 cm−1, [υ(C–C) + δ(C–H)] at 1390 and 1440 cm−1, and υ(C–C) at 1577 cm−1 are interpreted as b2 modes [29,30,31] (Table 1).
In the UV-Vis spectra of the TiO2/Ag bilayer (Figure 3c), two major absorption bands are observed. The band around 200–400 nm corresponds to the band gap absorption of TiO2-Ag, while the varying around 400–800 nm is attributed to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption of Ag. The blue shift of absorption peaks and the decrease of resonance intensity can be observed when the Ag thickness increases from 10 nm to 40 nm, which can be ascribed to the reconstruction of a new Fermi level in TiO2-Ag bilayer due to the special optical properties of TiO2 that can provide a large number of electrons [32]. The peak changes in the TiO2/Ag bilayer should be derived from the interaction between the chemical absorption of the PATP molecule and the nanostructure of the TiO2/Ag bilayer. Therefore, the charge transfer (CT) is calculated for the TiO2/Ag bilayer and pure Ag monolayer arrays, and the results are shown in Figure 4. Figure 3d presents the UV-Vis spectra of the as-prepared pure Ag nanomaterials with four different thicknesses of Ag. The broad absorption covering the range of 400–800 nm should be ascribed to the SPR of Ag. The red shift phenomenon appears when the thickness of Ag increases. The wavelength of the SPR band is related to the particle size, shape, and surrounding environment [33,34]. In addition, the spectra of Ag 40 nm show a sharp rise at about 320 nm, which corresponds to the onset of the interband absorption threshold energy hv = 3.9 eV of Ag [32]. In contrast to the Ag monolayer, the characteristic peaks exhibited are partly in the blue shift in the TiO2/Ag bilayer. For the TiO2/Ag bilayer, the SERS intensities decreased with the increase of Ag thickness, and the maximum value is observed when the thickness of the sublayer Ag is 10 nm, while the sample shows the weakest signal when the sublayer of Ag is 40 nm. However, for the Ag monolayer array, the intensity of the SERS signals increases with theincrease of the Ag thickness, and the maximum value is observed for an Ag thickness of 40 nm. Furthermore, with the increase of the content of Ag, the 1188 cm−1 characteristic peaks of PATP molecules on TiO2/Ag bilayer exhibited the blue shift from 1188 cm−1 of TiO2/Ag (10 nm) to 1182 cm−1 for the sample TiO2/Ag (40 nm) (Figure 4a). For the pure Ag monolayer (Figure 3b), the peaks do not show any shift. The above results indicate that TiO2 plays an important role in the peak shifts of PATP molecules absorbed on the TiO2/Ag bilayer. As TiO2 and Ag form composites, the size of nanoparticles changes. The peak shifts for TiO2/Ag can be reduced when the thickness of the Ag layer increases.
The band at the 1072 cm−1 (a1) peak of the C–S stretching vibration and the band at about 1391 cm−1 (b2) of the C–H and C–C bending vibrations are used to calculate the charge transfer degree. It is clear that the ratio of relative intensities of the two Raman peaks (1391 cm−1 and 1072 cm−1) of PATP molecules adsorbed on TiO2/Ag bilayer is remarkably changed. The charge transfer of the bilayer decreases upon increasing the thickness of the Ag layer, which indicates that the TiO2 on the surface of the bilayer plays an important role in charge transfer. We believe that the mixture components consisting of Ag and TiO2 occur at the surface of the bilayer due to the interface diffusion between the TiO2 and Ag sublayer when a thinner Ag film is deposited on TiO2. Furthermore, TiO2 can provide a large number of electrons due to its unique photoelectric properties and generate a new Fermi level in the composite structure, which causes a change in the charge transfer degree between the composites and PATP molecules. In general, the changes in the relative Raman band intensities between different vibrational modes are closely related to the chemical mechanism of SERS [35].
We use the concept of the “degree of CT ( ρ C T )”, proposed by Lombardi et al. [36,37] to estimate the influence of the contribution of CT resonance to the SERS intensity quantitatively. The ρ C T ( k ) can be determined by following equation:
ρ CT ( k ) = I k ( C T ) I k ( S P R ) I k ( C T ) + I 0 ( S P R )
Here, k is an index used to identify individual molecular lines in the Raman spectrum. We choose the intensities of two peaks (1072 cm−1 and 1391 cm−1) in a spectral region for better understanding. The 1072 cm−1 (a1) is totally symmetric to the SERS signal contributions from SPR, whose intensity is denoted as I 0 ( S P R ) , and for this line I k ( S P R ) = I 0 ( S P R ) . The other peak, 1391 cm−1 (b2), is non-totally symmetric (intensity denoted as I k ( C T ) ). It is the measured intensity in the region of the spectrum where CT resonance makes an additional contribution to the SERS intensity, excluding the contribution of SPR [31]. In this case, I k ( S P R ) is normally small or equal to zero. Then, Equation (2) can be approximately expressed as follows:
ρ C T = b 2 a 1 1 + b 2 a 1
In Figure 4a, the change of relative peak intensities of I1391/I1072 vibrational mode bands indicates the CT transition from the Fermi level of the TiO2-Ag composites to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) of the PATP molecules. With an increasing concentration of Ag, the charges of the TiO2-Ag-PATP complex can be redistributed further, resulting in a more suitable CT state involved in the SERS-CT process. The degree of CT ( ρ C T ) shows the match degree of excitation energy and the energy difference between the Fermi level of the TiO2-Ag composites and the LUMO of PATP, indicating that the b2 mode of PATP is selectively enhanced via the CT resonance transition. However, in the pure Ag monolayer (Figure 4b), Ag provides a large number of electrons in the charge transfer process so that more free electrons can be provided, which makes the charge transfer degree increase with the increase in Ag content.

2.3. Enhancement Factor (EF) of PS/TiO2/Ag and PS/TiO2:Ag

Except for the charge transfer, the change of the surface morphology of nanocaps array is another important factor for the enhancement of SERS for PS/TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer. As the SEM image of Figure 2 shows, a 10-nm Ag film was deposited on TiO2, and the composite of Ag and TiO2 increased the surface roughness, leading to the enhancement of the SERS signal. When the TiO2 layer was covered completely by the Ag film, the SERS signals decreased with the increase of the Ag thickness. To investigate the effect of the surface roughness and composite consisting of TiO2 and Ag on SERS, the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag (20 nm) monolayer was deposited on a PS template. Figure 5a–d show the SEM images and SERS spectra of the TiO2-Ag monolayer with different contents of TiO2. When the Ti content increased from 10 at.% to 28 at.%, the particles sizes and the surface roughness increased. The SERS intensity increased first and then decreased. Also, the maximum occurred when the TiO2 atomic percent content was 15%, as it was confirmed that the optimum surface roughness provided abundant hot spots that were created by the composite of TiO2 and Ag. Compared to the bilayer samples, TEM images show the small Ag particles formed in the co-sputtered monolayer (Figure 6). In addition, HRTEM images show that TiO2 is amorphous and the Ag particles trapped in amorphous TiO2 are about 8 nm, which is smaller than that of the bilayer of 30 nm, which shows that co-sputtered TiO2 can effectively inhibit the aggregation and growth of Ag nanoparticles.
The SERS enhancement factor (EF) is calculated from 10 randomly selected points for the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer and TiO2-Ag (20 nm) co-sputtered monolayer according to the equation [38,39,40] (Figure 7), E F = ( I S E R S × N b u l k ) / ( I b u l k × N a d s ) , where I S E R S and I b u l k are the SERS intensity of the bands at 1440 cm−1 assigned to PATP absorbed on TiO2/Ag arrays and the Raman intensity of the band at 1403 cm−1 assigned to the solid PATP, respectively. N b u l k = c R S V N A is the average number of molecules in the scattering volume (V) for the Raman (non-SERS) measurement. The molar concentration (cRS) of the PATP analyte on the reference region is 1 mM. N a d s is the average number of adsorbed molecules in the scattering volume for the SERS experiments. N a d s = N d A l a s e r A N / δ , where N d is the number density of PS with a diameter of 200 nm, and A l a s e r is the area of the focal laser spot. The laser spot is a circle with a diameter of 1 μm. A N is the half surface area of one PS with a diameter of 200 nm, and δ is the surface area occupied by a single PATP adsorbed on the substrate value, which is estimated to be 0.20 nm2 [41]. For the Renishaw Micro-Raman spectrometer with 633-nm laser excitation, the effective focused depth is 19 μm. N b u l k and N a d s can be calculated to be 1.77 × 1016 and 9.62 × 107, respectively. I S E R S / I b u l k are 261.3 and 17.23 for the TiO2/Ag bilayer and the TiO2-Ag co-sputtered monolayer at the band of 1391 cm−1, respectively. Therefore, E F is calculated to be 4.81 × 1010 and 3.17 × 109 for the TiO2/Ag bilayer and the TiO2-Ag co-sputtered monolayer, respectively. These results show that the monolayer prepared by the co-sputtering method has better homogeneity and SERS property than those of the bilayer.

3. Materials and Methods

4-Aminothiophenol (PATP) with a purity of 99.9% was used as the probing molecule. Sodium dodecyl sulfate and ethanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Concentration of 10 wt % of (particle deviation less than 10%) monodisperse polystyrene (PS) colloidal spheres with a size of 200 nm were purchased from The Duke (Durham, NC, USA). The Ag and TiO2 targets with a purity of 99.99% (wt %) used in the experiment were purchased from Beijing TIANRY Science & Technology Developing Center (Beijing, China). Silicon wafer was purchased from Hefei Kejing Materials Technology Co., Ltd (Hefei, China). Ultrapure water (18.0 MΩ·cm−1) was used throughout the present study.
The film deposition was performed in a magnetron sputtering system with JGP-560C. During deposition, the base vacuum degree was 2 × 10−4 Pa, and the argon pressure was 0.6 Pa. The sputtering powers of TiO2 were 50 W, 100 W, and 150 W; the sputtering power of Ag was 5.4 W. The PS (200 nm) monolayer colloidal array was prepared by using the self-assembly method [42]. The samples were immersed in PATP solution with a concentration of 3% for more than 30 min to reach saturation adsorption. The morphology and microstructure of the samples were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron microscopy (TEM). The SEM images were characterized under an accelerating voltage of 5.0 KV (model JSM-7800F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). TEM images were recorded on JEM-2100HR (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). UV-Vis spectra were measured on a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Raman spectra were obtained with a Renishaw Raman system model 2000 confocal microscopy spectrometer (Renishaw, London, UK). An air-cooled argon ion laser (Renishaw, London, UK) with 633-nm radiation from (40 mW, power out of 0.1%) was used for the SERS. The spectra were recorded with an accumulation time of 10 s. Film thickness was measured by a Stylus Profiler (Vecco Dektak 150, VEECO, Plainview, NY, USA).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we fabricated SERS substrate of TiO2 and Ag metal-semiconductor composite onto a 200-nm PS template by using a combination of the self-assembly technique and the magnetron sputtering method. Compared with the pure Ag film, the TiO2/Ag bilayer showed significant SERS enhancement when the Ag thickness was thin, which was ascribed to the electromagnetic mechanism (EM) and charge-transfer (CT) enhancement mechanisms in the metal-semiconductor system. The optimized TiO2 contents at the surface of the nanostructure not only improved the enhancement of SERS but also effectively inhibited the aggregation and growth of Ag nanoparticles, which was confirmed by the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag monolayer. The TiO2-Ag nanocaps array exhibited a good periodicity and uniformity; the enhancement factor reached 4.81 × 1010 for the TiO2/Ag bilayer and 3.17 × 109 for the TiO2-Ag monolayer, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/7/7/159/s1, Figure S1: XRD patterns of samples for TiO2/Ag bilayer and monolayer TiO2 deposited on PS200 nm templates; Figure S2: The element analysis mapping of bilayer TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) nanocap arrays by SEM; Figure S3: SEM of PS200 nm template.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61575080, 61675090 and 21676115), National Youth Program Foundation of China (Nos. 21546013, 61405072 and 51609100), Program for the development of Science and Technology of Jilin province (Nos. 20150519024JH, 20150520015JH, 20160101287JC and 20140519003JH), and Technology of Education Department of Jilin Province (Nos. 2016-217 and JJKH20170374KJ). Thank Fan Zhang, Shuang Guo, Renxian Gao and Yang Liu for their contributions to the research and discussion process.

Author Contributions

Yaxin Wang and Yongjun Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Chao Yan performed the experiments and document retrieval; Yaxin Wang and Chao Yan analyzed the data; Yaxin Wang wrote the paper; Lei Chen and Yongjun Zhang contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; Jinghai Yang helped perform the analysis with constructive theoretical discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fleischmann, M.; Hendra, P.J.; Mcquillan, A.J. Raman Spectra of Pyridine Adsorbed at a Silver Electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 26, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jeanmaire, D.L.; Duyne, R.P.V. Surface Raman SpectroElectrochemistry Part I. Heterocyclic, Aromatic and Aliphatic Amines Adsorbed on the Anodized Silver Electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfac. Electrochem. 1997, 84, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ngo, H.T.; Wang, H.N.; Fales, A.M.; Vo-Dinh, T. Label-Free DNA Biosensor Based on SERS Molecular Sentinel on Nanowave Chip. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 6378–6383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zong, S.F.; Cui, Y.P. Rapid and Reproducible Analysis of Thiocyanate in Real Human Serum and Saliva Using a Droplet SERS-Microfluidic Chip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 62, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ma, W.; Sun, M.Z.; Xu, L.G.; Wang, L.B.; Kuang, H.; Xu, C.L. A SERS Active Gold Nanostar Dimer for Mercury Ion Detection. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4989–4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shanmukh, S.; Jones, L.; Driskell, J.; Zhao, Y.P.; Dluhy, R.; Tripp, R.A. Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Respiratory Virus Molecular Signatures Using a Silver Nanorod Array SERS Substrate. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2630–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Albrecht, M.G.; Creighton, J.A. Anomalously Intense Raman Spectra of Pyridine at a Silver Electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 99, 5215–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, S.J.; Liu, K.-K.; Su, S.; Yan, J.; Mao, X.H.; Wang, D.F.; He, Y.; Li, L.-J.; Song, S.P.; Fan, C.H. Graphene-Based High-Efficiency Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Active Platform for Sensitive and Multiplex DNA Detection. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4622–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bantz, K.C.; Meyer, A.F.; Wittenberg, N.J.; Im, H.; Kurtulus, Ö.; Lee, S.H.; Lindquist, N.C.; Oh, S.-H.; Haynes, C.L. Recent progress in SERS biosensing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 11551–11567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang, Y.X.; Li, J.F.; Wu, D.Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Ren, B.; Hu, J.W.; Chow, Y.L.; Tian, Z.Q. Characterization of surface water on Au core Pt-group metal shell nanoparticles coated electrodes by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2007, 44, 4608–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yang, L.B.; Jiang, X.; Ruan, W.D.; Zhao, B.; Xu, W.Q.; Lombard, J.R. Observation of Enhanced Raman Scattering for Molecules Adsorbed on TiO2 nanoparticles: Charge-Transfer Contribution. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 20095–20098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.X.; Song, W.; Ruan, W.D.; Yang, J.X.; Zhao, B.; Lombard, J.R. SERS Spectroscopy to Study an Adsorbate on Nanoscale Thin Film of CuO coated with Ag. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 8065–8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, W.G.; Mao, N.N.; Zhang, J. Graphene: A Plat form for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Small 2013, 9, 1206–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, L.B.; Jiang, X.; Ruan, W.D.; Yang, J.X.; Zhao, B.; Xu, W.Q.; Lombardi, J.R. Charge-Transfer-Induced Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering on Ag–TiO2 Nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 16226–16231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Su, Y.; He, Q.; Yan, X.H.; Fei, J.B.; Cui, Y.; Li, J.B. Peptide Mesocrystals as Templates to Create an Au Surface with Stronger Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Properties. Chem. A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3370–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bai, J.; Zhou, B.X. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for Sensor Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10131–10176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ghicov, A.; Schmuki, P. Self-ordering electrochemistry: A review on growth and functionality of TiO2 nanotubes and other self-aligned MOx structures. Chem. Commun. 2009, 20, 2791–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D.; Zaleska, A.; Bein, T. Three-Dimensional Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9487–9558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Song, W.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhao, B. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of 4-Mercaptopyridine on the Surface of TiO2 Nanofibers Coated with Ag Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 12786–12791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shaviv, E.; Schubert, O.; Alves-Santos, M.; Goldoni, G.; Felice, R.D.; Fatti, F.; Fatti, N.D.; Banin, U.; Sönnichsen, C. Absorption Properties of Metal–Semiconductor Hybrid, Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4712–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Venkatasubramanian, R.; Srivastava, R.S.; Misra, R.D.K. Comparative study of antimicrobial and photocatalytic activity in titaniaencapsulated composite nanoparticles with different dopants. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2008, 24, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rawat, J.; Rana, S.; Srivastava, R.S.; Misra, R.D.K. Anti-microbial activity of composite nanoparticles consisting of titania photocatalytic shell and nickel ferrite magnetic core. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2007, 27, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rana, S.; Rawat, J.; Misra, R.D.K. Anti-microbial active composite nanoparticles with magnetic core and photocatalytic shell: TiO2–NiFe2O4 bio-material system. Acta Biomater. 2005, 1, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, J.H.; Lin, J.; Li, X.H.; Zhao, G.N.; Zhang, W.J. Silver nanoparticles deposited inverse opal film as a highly active and uniform SERS substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 347, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Klaysri, R.; Praserthdam, P.; Kelly, P.J.; Ratova, M. Deposition of Visible Light-Active C-Doped Titania Films via Magnetron Sputtering Using CO2 as a Source of Carbon. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fromm, D.P.; Sundaramurthy, A.; Kinkhabwala, A.; Schuck, P.J.; Kino, G.S.; Moerner, W.E. Exploring the Chemical Enhancement for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering with Au Bowtie Nanoantennas. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 061101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hou, X.M.; Zhang, X.L.; Chen, S.T.; Fang, Y.; Yan, J.L.; Li, N.; Qi, P.X. Facile Synthesis of SERS Active Ag Nanoparticles in the Presence of Tri-N-Octylphosphine Sulfide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 4935–4940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, B.; Wang, W.; Miller, D.L.; Li, C.Y. Polymer-Single-Crystal@Nanoparticle Nanosandwich for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15526–15529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, S.C.; Zhang, Y.X.; Luo, Y.Y.; Wang, S.; Ding, H.L.; Xu, J.M.; Li, G.H. Ag-Decorated TiO2 Nanograss for 3D SERS-Active Substrate with Visible Light Self-Cleaning and Reactivation. Analyst 2013, 138, 4519–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sun, Z.H.; Wang, C.X.; Yang, J.X.; Zhao, B.; Lombard, J.R. Nanoparticle Metal–Semiconductor Charge Transfer in ZnO/PATP/Ag Assemblies by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 6093–6098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Ji, W.; Sui, H.M.; Kitahama, Y.; Ruan, W.D.; Ozaki, Y.; Zhao, B. Exploring the Effect of Intermolecular H-Bonding: A Study on Charge-Transfer Contribution to Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of p-Mercaptobenzoic Acid. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 10191–10197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, L.; Wang, W.H.; Jiang, H.Y.; Zhang, Q.H.; Shan, H.H.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, K.; Lv, J.G.; He, G.; Sun, Z.Q. Improved SERS performance of single-crystalline TiO2 nanosheet arrays with coexposed {001} and {101} facets decorated with Ag nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Awazu, K.; Fujimaki, M.; Rockstuhl, C.; Tominaga, J.; Murakami, H.; Ohki, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Watanabe, T. A Plasmonic Photocatalyst Consisting of Silver Nanoparticles Embedded in Titanium Dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1676–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Khan, M.M.; Ansari, S.A.; Amal, M.I.; Lee, J.; Cho, M.H. Highly visible light active Ag@TiO2 nanocomposites synthesized using an electrochemically active biofilm: A novel biogenic approach. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4427–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Han, X.X.; Ji, W.; Zhao, B.; Ozaki, Y. Semiconductor-enhanced Raman scattering: Active nanomaterials and applications. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4847–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lombardi, J.R.; Birke, R.L. A Unified View of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lombardi, J.R.; Birke, R.L. A Unified Approach to Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 5605–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.L.; Zou, X.Q.; Ren, W.; Wang, W.D.; Wang, E. Effect of Silver Nanoplates on Raman Spectra of p-Aminothiophenol Assembled on Smooth Macroscopic Gold and Silver Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 3259–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ren, B.; Lin, X.F.; Yang, Z.L.; Liu, G.K.; Aroca, R.F.; Mao, B.W.; Tian, Z.Q. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering in the Ultraviolet Spectral Region: UV-SERS on Rhodium and Ruthenium Electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9598–9599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhu, S.M.; Fan, C.Z.; Wang, J.Q.; He, J.N.; Liang, E.; Chao, M. Surface enhanced Raman scattering of 4-aminothiophenol sandwiched between Ag nanocubes and smooth Pt substrate: The effect of the thickness of Pt film. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 044312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, J.; Bosnick, K.; Maillard, M.; Brus, L. Single Molecule Raman Spectroscopy at the Junctions of Large Ag Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9964–9972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.X.; Zhao, X.Y.; Chen, L.; Chen, S.; Wei, M.B.; Gao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Qu, X.; Zhang, Y.J.; et al. Ordered Nanocap Array Composed of SiO2-Isolated Ag Islands as SERS Platform. Langmuir 2014, 30, 15285–15291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation process for the nanocap arrays of the TiO2/Ag bilayer and the TiO2-Ag monolayer.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation process for the nanocap arrays of the TiO2/Ag bilayer and the TiO2-Ag monolayer.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of bilayer TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag t nm (from (a) to (d), t = 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm) on the PS template for different thicknesses of the Ag layer. The illustration is the cross-section of the sample.
Figure 2. SEM images of bilayer TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag t nm (from (a) to (d), t = 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm) on the PS template for different thicknesses of the Ag layer. The illustration is the cross-section of the sample.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g002
Figure 3. SERS spectra of (a) PS/TiO2 (10 nm) /Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer; (b) PS/Ag (10–40 nm) monolayer resembled on 200 nm PS template; (c) UV-Vis absorption spectra of PS/TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer; (d) UV-Vis absorption spectra of PS/Ag (10–40 nm).
Figure 3. SERS spectra of (a) PS/TiO2 (10 nm) /Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer; (b) PS/Ag (10–40 nm) monolayer resembled on 200 nm PS template; (c) UV-Vis absorption spectra of PS/TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer; (d) UV-Vis absorption spectra of PS/Ag (10–40 nm).
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g003
Figure 4. Column statistics of relative peak intensity and charge transfer for (a) I1391/I1072 of the PS/TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer and (b) I1389/I1071 of the pure PS/Ag (10–40 nm) monolayer.
Figure 4. Column statistics of relative peak intensity and charge transfer for (a) I1391/I1072 of the PS/TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10–40 nm) bilayer and (b) I1389/I1071 of the pure PS/Ag (10–40 nm) monolayer.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g004
Figure 5. (ac) SEM images and (d) SERS spectra of TiO2-Ag (20 nm) with different TiO2 atomic percent contents: (a) 10%; (b) 15%; (c) 25%.
Figure 5. (ac) SEM images and (d) SERS spectra of TiO2-Ag (20 nm) with different TiO2 atomic percent contents: (a) 10%; (b) 15%; (c) 25%.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g005
Figure 6. TEM and HRTEM images of (a,c) the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer, and (b,d) the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag (20 nm) monolayer.
Figure 6. TEM and HRTEM images of (a,c) the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer, and (b,d) the co-sputtered TiO2-Ag (20 nm) monolayer.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g006
Figure 7. Reproducibility test for SERS spectra of the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer.
Figure 7. Reproducibility test for SERS spectra of the TiO2 (10 nm)/Ag (10 nm) bilayer.
Nanomaterials 07 00159 g007
Table 1. Wavenumbers and assignments of bands in the SERS spectrum of PATP molecule.
Table 1. Wavenumbers and assignments of bands in the SERS spectrum of PATP molecule.
Wavenumber (cm−1)Band Assignment
PS/TiO2/AgPS/Ag
1577m1577mυCC, 8b(b2)
1472w1472wυCC, 19a(a1)
1440υs1439υsυCC + δCH, 19b(b2)
1390s1389sδCH + υCC, 3(b2)
1302w1301wυCC + δCH, 14(b2)
1188w1182wδCH, 9a(a1)
1141υs1140υsδCH, 9b(b2)
1072m1071mυCS, 7a(a1)
1008w1008wγCC + γCCC, 18a(a1)
Approximate description of the modes (υ, stretch; δ and γ, bend). Frequencies (in cm−1) followed by relative intensities (υs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Yan, C.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J. Controllable Charge Transfer in Ag-TiO2 Composite Structure for SERS Application. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7070159

AMA Style

Wang Y, Yan C, Chen L, Zhang Y, Yang J. Controllable Charge Transfer in Ag-TiO2 Composite Structure for SERS Application. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(7):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7070159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yaxin, Chao Yan, Lei Chen, Yongjun Zhang, and Jinghai Yang. 2017. "Controllable Charge Transfer in Ag-TiO2 Composite Structure for SERS Application" Nanomaterials 7, no. 7: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7070159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop