Next Article in Journal
Performance of Electropun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibrous Phases, Shown for the Separation of Water-Soluble Food Dyes via UTLC-Vis-ESI-MS
Next Article in Special Issue
Growth Method-Dependent and Defect Density-Oriented Structural, Optical, Conductive, and Physical Properties of Solution-Grown ZnO Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicity and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Potentials of Holmium Oxide Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth Mechanism Studies of ZnO Nanowires: Experimental Observations and Short-Circuit Diffusion Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/nano7080217
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles Supported on Amorphous SiO2

by
Ying Chen
,
Hao Ding
* and
Sijia Sun
Beijing Key Laboratory of Materials Utilization of Nonmetallic Minerals and Solid Wastes, National Laboratory of Mineral Materials, School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(8), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080217
Submission received: 30 June 2017 / Revised: 21 July 2017 / Accepted: 24 July 2017 / Published: 10 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ZnO and TiO2 Based Nanostructures)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In order to reduce the primary particle size of zinc oxide (ZnO) and eliminate the agglomeration phenomenon to form a monodisperse state, Zn2+ was loaded on the surface of amorphous silica (SiO2) by the hydrogen bond association between hydroxyl groups in the hydrothermal process. After calcining the precursors, dehydration condensation among hydroxyl groups occurred and ZnO nanoparticles supported on amorphous SiO2 (ZnO–SiO2) were prepared. Furthermore, the SEM and TEM observations showed that ZnO nanoparticles with a particle size of 3–8 nm were uniformly and dispersedly loaded on the surface of amorphous SiO2. Compared with pure ZnO, ZnO–SiO2 showed a much better antibacterial performance in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test and the antibacterial properties of the paint adding ZnO–SiO2 composite.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial tests and environmental toxicity tests have been widely explored in order to improve health, safety, and the environment [1,2,3]. Zinc oxide (ZnO), as a semiconductor material with a band gap of 3.3 eV at room temperature [4], has high chemical stability, strong photosensitivity and non-toxicity property and is widely used in antibacterial materials [5]. Compared with ordinary ZnO powder, ZnO nanoparticles have a large specific surface area and small size effect, and show wide application potential in microbial inhibition and mildew removal [6,7].
However, like most of the nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles are prone to forming serious agglomeration, including hard agglomeration among the particles formed via the chemical reaction of the surface groups and soft agglomeration formed by other physical effects [8]. It is difficult to depolymerize the particles involved in hard agglomeration. Therefore, the apparent grain size of the primary ZnO particles tends to increase to the micron scale and the normal performance of ZnO nanoparticles is inhibited. In the preparation process of ZnO nanoparticles, in addition to the control of the ZnO morphology and primary particle size, the agglomeration phenomenon of ZnO particles should be suppressed to obtain dispersed nanoparticles. Wang et al. synthesized the doped ZnO nanoparticles with the mixture of alcohol and water as the solvent according to a precipitation method [9]. Chen et al. prepared ZnO nanocrystals via the reaction of zinc stearate with excessive alcohol in the hydrocarbon solvent [10]. Weller et al. used the low-temperature solvent thermal method to synthesize dispersible spherical ZnO nanoparticles and nano-rods with zinc acetate as precursors in methanol [11]. However, these methods have low synthesis performance and limited control ability. Especially, the solvent thermal process [12,13] is required to deal with organic solvents and it is difficult to realize industrial production. Therefore, some nanoparticles (such as titanium dioxide, TiO2) [14,15] are supported on the surface or pores of the inorganic carrier. In this way, the strong interaction between the carrier surface and nanoparticles, and the forced isolation among the carrier particles efficiently prevent the agglomeration among the nanoparticles and improve the dispersion effects and functions.
Amorphous SiO2, commercially known as white carbon black, is an aggregate of SiO2 particles (SiO2·nH2O) and commonly used as a rubber reinforcing additive [16,17]. The primary particle size of SiO2 particles is generally 10–100 nm. SiO2 particles containing rich Si–OH groups, which can form a strong interaction between the SiO2 carrier surface and Zn–OH (precursors of ZnO). This interaction reduces the combination between Zn–OH and prevents its aggregation, thus contributing to the formation of monodisperse ZnO nanoparticles. In addition, small amorphous SiO2 particles have high dispensability and can prevent further agglomeration of ZnO–SiO2 composite. Therefore, amorphous SiO2 was selected as the carrier of supported ZnO nanoparticles.
Based on the above results, in this paper, the environmentally friendly hydrothermal method was adopted to prepare ZnO–SiO2 by loading Zn2+ on the surface of amorphous SiO2 and calcining active products at high temperatures. Moreover, the structures and antibacterial properties of as-prepared ZnO–SiO2 were explored.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials

In this study, amorphous SiO2 was purchased from Henan Jiaozuo Fluoride New Energy Technology Co., Ltd (Jiaozuo, Henan, China). The properties of amorphous SiO2 are described as follows: SiO2 content of 96.63%, whiteness of 96.76%, average aggregate size of 20 μm, primary particle size of 20–30 nm, and specific surface area of 59.54 m2/g. Zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O) as the source of Zn2+ was from Beijing Yili Fine Chemical Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Sodium polyacrylate (PAAS) as a dispersant was supplied by Changzhou Run Yang Chemical Co., Ltd (Changzhou, Jiangsu, China). Pure ZnO, as an antibacterial agent, was compared with the ZnO–SiO2 composite in antibacterial performance. It was produced by the Xi Long Chemical Co., Ltd (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) and the size of the particles was about 200 nm. Figure 1 shows SEM images of amorphous SiO2 and pure ZnO.

2.2. ZnO–SiO2 Precursor

Amorphous SiO2, sodium polyacrylate (1% of the weight of SiO2) and H2O were mixed and stirred to prepare the suspension with solid content of 18%. Ceramic polishing balls (diameter: 1–3 mm) were added into the suspension according to the proportion of 50% of the solid content and then stirred at a speed of 1000 r/min for 1 h to prepare the depolymerized amorphous SiO2 slurry. A zinc nitrate solution (0.09 wt %) was added into the slurry and the pH of the mixture was respectively adjusted to 5.0 and 7.0 by adding 6 mol/L NaOH and 6 mol/L HNO3. The mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 1 h. The precursors were obtained after suction filtration, washing, and drying and denoted as Zn–SiO2-pH5.0 (the precursor was prepared with pH value at 5.0) and Zn–SiO2-pH7.0 (the precursor was prepared with pH value at 7.0) respectively. The preparation process is shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Preparation of ZnO–SiO2

The precursors Zn–SiO2-pH5.0 and Zn-SiO2-pH7.0 were calcined at 400 °C for 1 h to obtain the composite particles of ZnO and SiO2 and denoted as ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 (the composite obtained by calcining the precursor which was prepared with pH value at 5.0) and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 (the composite obtained by calcining the precursor which was prepared with pH value at 7.0). The loads of ZnO were 4.51 and 11.26%, respectively.

2.4. Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was measured by using a D/max-Ra X-ray diffractometer (Ouyatu, Japan, Cu Kα radiation = 1.54 Å) in an angular range of 10–80° (2θ) with a step of 0.02° (2θ). Scherer Equation [18] is used to calculate the average grain size of ZnO nanoparticles:
β = Κ λ D c o s θ ″
where K is the shape factor constant (0.94); λ is X-ray wavelength; D is the grain size; θ is the diffraction angle; β is the diffraction peak half width.
An X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF Shimadzu-1800, Kyoto, Japan) was used to analyze the oxide content of samples. The particle size and size distribution of the composite particles of ZnO and SiO2 were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM FEI Tecnai G220, Portland, OR, USA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to explore the morphology of ZnO–SiO2 by a Hitachi field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S4800, Tokyo, Japan) under the voltage of 10 kV. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Madison, WI, USA) measurement was carried out to explore the changes in functional groups of ZnO-SiO2 by Nicolet IS50. The samples were finely pulverized and then diluted in dried KBr to form a homogeneous mixture according to the sample-KBr ratio of 1/200. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Manchester, UK) measurement was conducted on an Axis Ultra spectrometer with monochromatic Mg Kα (1253.6 eV) radiation to investigate the valence state of Zn.

2.5. Antimicrobial Test

The antimicrobial ability of ZnO–SiO2 under dark conditions was investigated through antibacterial tests [19,20,21]. Different concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0, and pure ZnO were added to the agar medium, and then E. coli (CGMCC 1.2385) was inoculated on the medium to observe the growth of bacteria and determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [22].
The antimicrobial coating was obtained by mixing 12 wt % styrene-acrylic emulsion, 34 wt % of H2O, 50 wt % of the filler (0–8 wt % of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0), and 4 wt % of paint additive. The antibacterial property of ZnO–SiO2 was evaluated by testing the antibacterial property of the coating. The antibacterial rate of the coating was tested according to Chinese national standard GB/T21866-2008 [23]. The antibacterial rate (R) is calculated as:
R = 100% × (A − B)/A,
where A and B are the average number of colonies of the blank control plate and antibacterial coating plate after 24 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Characterization of ZnO–SiO2

3.1.1. Phase and Chemical Constitution of ZnO–SiO2

Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of ZnO–SiO2. Table 1 shows the XRF results of each sample. The XRD pattern of the SiO2 carrier shows a strong bread peak near 2θ of 23°, indicating that the main phase is an amorphous phase corresponding to amorphous SiO2. In the XRD patterns of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0, in addition to the above-mentioned peak reflecting the amorphous phase, the peaks at 31.8°, 34.5°, 36.3°, and 47.5° correspond to the ZnO diffraction peak [24,25], indicating that Zn2+ has been transformed into ZnO after the thermal reaction with the SiO2 carrier and calcination. The ZnO diffraction intensity of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 was significantly larger than that of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 due to the different loadings of ZnO. The contents of ZnO in ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 are respectively 4.51 and 11.26% (Table 1). The SiO2 content in ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 is lower than that in ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0. The results are consistent with the XRD results.
According to the XRD data in Figure 3, the grain size of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 was calculated to be 3.63 nm according to the Scherer Equation.

3.1.2. Microstructure of ZnO–SiO2

Figure 4 shows the distribution of three elements (O, Si, and Zn) in ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0. The distributions of these three elements are consistent with the distribution of ZnO–SiO2 particles. The distribution densities of O and Si are larger than that of Zn. The Zn density in the elemental distribution of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 is greater than that of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0. The results indicate that the main components of ZnO–SiO2 are SiO2. The content of ZnO is low, but evenly distributed on the surface of SiO2 particles.
Figure 5 shows the TEM images of the amorphous SiO2 carrier, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0. At a small scale, all the samples are regular particle aggregates. The particle size is about 20–30 nm. Although these particles overlap each other, the overall dispersion effect is good. These unit particles are obviously amorphous SiO2 particles. At the scale of 10 nm, the surface morphology of SiO2 particles in the SiO2 carrier is uniform, indicating that no other material is loaded. At the scale of 2 nm, only homogeneous non-crystal phase particles are observed. Dark spots with a size of 3–8 nm are uniformly distributed in ZnO–SiO2-PH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 at the scale of 10 nm. These dark spots are crystal phase particles at the larger magnification. The stripe spacing can reflect the lattice size. The stripe spacing of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 are respectively measured to be 2.45 and 2.59 nm. ZnO (101) plane spacing and ZnO (002) plane spacing are respectively measured to be 2.45 and 2.59 Å, which are almost consistent with standard ZnO (101) plane spacing of 2.47 Å and ZnO (002) plane spacing of 2.60 Å (ICDD card # 89-7102). These data indicate that these ZnO nanoparticles were monodispersedly loaded on the SiO2 surface. The size of ZnO particles is 3–8 nm, which is consistent with the average particle size of 3.63 nm obtained in the XRD test [18].

3.1.3. Formation Mechanism of ZnO–SiO2

Figure 6 shows the XPS pattern between 1015 and 1050 eV of the ZnO–SiO2. The peaks of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 at 1046.0 and 1045.5 eV correspond to Zn2p1/2 orbital; the peaks at 1023.0 and 1022.5 eV correspond to the Zn2p3/2 orbital [26]. These peaks are equivalent to the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 energy peaks (1044.2 and 1021.2 eV) of ZnO [27]. Moreover, the energy difference between Zn2p1/2 and Zn2p3/2 orbitals is 23 eV, which is the same as that of ZnO. Therefore, it can be determined that the valence of Zn in ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 is +2, which is consistent with the results of XRD, XRF, and TEM.
Table 2 shows the percentages of the amorphous SiO2 carrier, composite precursors (pH 5.0 and 7.0) and ZnO–SiO2 based on XPS. Compared with the amorphous SiO2 carrier, the Zn2+ composite precursors show the increasing ratio of O/Si with the increase in the Zn content. The change may be interpreted as follows. Hydroxyl groups generated by the hydrolysis of Zn form hydrogen bonds on the SiO2 surface, thus resulting in an increase in the amount of O. Compared with the precursors, ZnO–SiO2 products show a decreased O/Si ratio because the amount of oxygen is decreased by the dehydration condensation reaction among the –OH bonds on the surface of precursors during calcination. The above analysis suggests that ZnO nanoparticles was loaded on the surface of amorphous SiO2.
Figure 7 shows the infrared spectra of the amorphous SiO2 carrier, Zn2+ composite precursor (Zn–SiO2-pH5.0 and Zn–SiO2-pH7.0), and the final products (ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0). The absorption peaks of each sample at 450 and 1062 cm−1 are respectively ascribed to symmetrical and antisymmetric stretching vibration of Si–O–Si. The absorption peak at 799 cm−1 corresponds to bending vibration, reflecting the characteristics of SiO2 [28]. As shown in Figure 7, the infrared spectra of Zn2+ composite precursors (Zn–SiO2-pH5.0 and Zn–SiO2-pH7.0) at 3317 and 3319 cm−1 correspond to Zn–OH stretching vibration. The absorption peaks of hydroxyl groups in zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)2) at 1345 and 1347 cm−1 reflect the bridging effect of the hydroxyl group in the product, and the Si–OH bending vibration peak in the two products moves from 958 cm−1 (the vibration peak of the raw material SiO2) to 952 and 954 cm−1, respectively. The changes indicate that in the hydrothermal reaction during the preparation process of Zn–SiO2-pH5.0, Zn2+ forms a complex of Zn(OH)2, which yields hydrogen bonds with Si–OH on the surface of amorphous SiO2 [29,30,31]. In addition, the –OH bending vibration peaks of water adsorbed on the surface of Zn–SiO2-pH5.0 and Zn–SiO2-pH7.0 occur at 1413 and 1411 cm−1, respectively. The –OH shear vibration peaks occur at 1580 and 1579 cm−1 [32]. The Zn–OH and Si–OH of calcined products and the –OH bond of adsorbed water disappeared after the calcination of the precursors. Therefore, the high-temperature calcination resulted in the evaporation of SiO2 surface water and the dehydration condensation reaction between Si–OH and Zn–OH, and yielded Si–O–Zn chemical bond.
Figure 8 shows a schematic diagram of the synthesis process of ZnO–SiO2 by loading Zn2+ on the amorphous SiO2 carrier via the hydrothermal reaction and composite precursor calcination. Due to the large number of Si–OH bonds on the surface of SiO2 and the strong activity of Si–OH bonds, the interaction between Si–OH and Zn–OH is greater than the interaction in Zn–OH (multinuclear ions). Therefore, Zn2+ is immobilized on the surface of SiO2 and dispersed ZnO nanoparticles are formed after the calcination of precursors.

3.2. Antibacterial Properties of ZnO–SiO2

ZnO has antibacterial activity under light and dark conditions and is mostly applied under dark conditions. In order to investigate the antibacterial properties of ZnO–SiO2 under dark conditions, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0, and pure ZnO were respectively prepared. Figure 9 shows the bacterial growth profiles obtained by the plate test. Obvious colonies were formed in the blank control without the antimicrobial material (Figure 9a). When the concentration of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 was 10 mg/mL, obvious colonies were observed on the culture plate; when the concentration of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 was 20 mg/mL, the number of colonies decreased but colonies did not completely disappear; when the concentration of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 was increased to 36 mg/mL, no colony was formed (Figure 9b). The concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 and pure ZnO required for colony-free results were respectively 19 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL (Figure 9c,d). Based on the above results, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each sample was determined and converted into the minimum inhibitory concentration of ZnO based on the content of ZnO in the composite (Table 3). The MIC values of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 were respectively 1.60 and 2.14 mg/mL, which were equivalent to 10% of the MIC of pure ZnO (20 mg/mL), indicating that the antimicrobial ability of ZnO nanoparticles loaded on the SiO2 surface was about 10 times that of pure ZnO. Obviously, the formation of dispersed nanoparticles (3–8 nm) loaded on amorphous SiO2 greatly improved its antimicrobial performance.
Figure 10 shows the antibacterial rate and colony growth conditions of E. coli on the plates added with different amounts of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 coating. The antibacterial rate of the coating without ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 was 0 and a large number of colonies were formed on the plate, indicating that the coating showed no antibacterial property. When the addition of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 in the coating was only 2%, the antibacterial rate was increased above 70%, showing a good antibacterial effect; when the dosage was gradually increased to 8%, the antibacterial rate of the coating to E. coli was 90.48%, which met the requirements of the antibacterial effect of antibacterial coating in Chinese national standard GBT21866-2008. The increasing antibacterial rate of the paint indicated less colonies and a better antibacterial effect.
The antimicrobial properties of the ZnO nanoparticles supported uniformly and dispersedly on the surface of SiO2 were greatly improved, due to the large specific surface area and surface activity of ZnO nanoparticles compared with the pure ZnO of large particles, and the contact and inhibition with microbes is stronger. This should be considered as one of the means to enhance the function of ZnO.

4. Conclusions

ZnO–SiO2 composite was prepared by an environmentally friendly hydrothermal method and high-temperature calcination. In this composite, ZnO nanoparticles with a particle size of 3–8 nm were uniformly and dispersedly loaded on the surface of amorphous SiO2. The size of the ZnO particles used in the industry is about 500 nm, and there is a certain degree of agglomeration among particles. According to the analysis of relevant tests, the strong interaction between the SiO2 carrier surface and Zn–OH (precursors of ZnO) reduced the combination between Zn–OH, prevented its aggregation and formed monodispersed nanoparticles. Compared with pure ZnO, ZnO–SiO2 showed much better antibacterial performance in the MIC test and the characterization test of paint properties.
In general, ZnO nanoparticles loaded uniformly and depressively on the surface of amorphous SiO2 greatly enhanced its antibacterial function.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 2652016160) and the Project Commissioned by Shandong Private Enterprises (No. 2015-KY19-139 20151224).

Author Contributions

Ying Chen and Hao Ding conceived and designed the experiments; Ying Chen performed the experiments; Ying Chen, Hao Ding and Sijia Sun anamyzed the date; Hao Ding contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Ying Chen wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ficociello, G.; Zanni, E.; Cialfi, S.; Aurizi, C.; Biolcati, G.; Palleschi, C.; Talora, C.; Uccelletti, D. Glutathione S-transferase θ-subunit as a phenotypic suppressor of pmr1Δ strain, the Kluyveromyces lactis model for Hailey-Hailey disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1863, 2650–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zanni, E.; Laudenzi, C.; Schifano, E.; Palleschi, C.; Perozzi, G.; Uccelletti, D.; Devirgiliis, C. Impact of a Complex Food Microbiota on Energy Metabolism in the Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 621709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Uccelletti, D.; Zanni, E.; Guerisoli, M.; Palleschi, C. Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging animal model for biomonitoring environmental toxicity. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 150, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malachová, K.; Praus, P.; Rybková, Z.; Kozák, O. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of silver, copper and zinc montmorillonites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 53, 642–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zanni, E.; Chandraiahgari, C.R.; Bellis, G.D.; Montereali, M.R.; Armiento, G.; Ballirano, P.; Polimeni, A.; Sarto, M.S.; Uccelletti, D. Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Decorated Graphene Nanoplatelets: A Promising Antimicrobial Agent against the Cariogenic Bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Niu, J.; Chen, Y. Mechanism of Photogenerated Reactive Oxygen Species and Correlation with the Antibacterial Properties of Engineered Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5164–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cha, S.H.; Hong, J.; Mcguffie, M.; Yeom, B.; Vanepps, J.S.; Kotov, N.A. Shape-Dependent Biomimetic Inhibition of Enzyme by Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Activity. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9097–9105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vincenzini, P. Ceramic Powders; Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co: New York, NY, USA, 1983; Volume 16, pp. 843–849. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, M.-H.; Ma, X.-Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, F. Synthesis of doped ZnO nanopowders in alcohol–water solvent for varistors applications. Mater. Lett. 2014, 121, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.; Kim, M.; Lian, G.; Johnson, M.B.; Peng, X. Side reactions in controlling the quality, yield, and stability of high quality colloidal nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13331–13337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pacholski, C.; Kornowski, A.; Weller, H. Self-Assembly of ZnO: From Nanodots to Nanorods. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1188–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choi, S.H.; Kim, E.G.; Park, J.; An, K.; Lee, N.; And, S.C.K.; Hyeon, T. Large-Scale Synthesis of Hexagonal Pyramid-Shaped ZnO Nanocrystals from Thermolysis of Zn-Oleate Complex. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 14792–14794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pacholski, C.; Kornowski, A.; Weller, H. ZnO nanorods: Growth mechanism and anisotropic functionalization. In Proceedings of the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting on Optical Science and Technology, Denver, CO, USA, 2–6 August 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ito, M.; Fukahori, S.; Fujiwara, T. Adsorptive removal and photocatalytic decomposition of sulfamethazine in secondary effluent using TiO2-zeolite composites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2014, 21, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hassani, A.; Khataee, A.; Karaca, S.; Karaca, C.; Gholami, P. Sonocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin using synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles on montmorillonite. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 35, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, K.; Sun, Q.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, S. Preparation of super-hydrophobic white carbon black from nano-rice husk ash. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2013, 40, 1965–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.; Peng, Z.; Kong, L.X.; Huang, M.F.; Li, P.W. Natural rubber nanocomposite reinforced with nano silica. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2008, 48, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khorsand Zak, A.; Majid, W.H.A.; Ebrahimizadeh Abrishami, M.; Yousefi, R.; Parvizi, R. Synthesis, magnetic properties and X-ray analysis of Zn0.97X0.03O nanoparticles (X = Mn, Ni, and Co) using Scherrer and size-strain plot methods. Solid State Sci. 2012, 14, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, N.; Ray, B.; Ranjit, K.T.; Manna, A.C. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 279, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tam, K.H.; Djurišić, A.B.; Chan, C.M.N.; Xi, Y.Y.; Tse, C.W.; Leung, Y.H.; Chan, W.K.; Leung, F.C.C.; Au, D.W.T. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanorods prepared by a hydrothermal method. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 6167–6174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhong, Z.; Zhe, X.; Sheng, T.; Yao, J.; Xing, W.; Yong, W. Unusual Air Filters with Ultrahigh Efficiency and Antibacterial Functionality Enabled by ZnO Nanorods. ACS App. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21538–21544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schwalbe, R.; Steele-Moore, L.; Goodwin, A.C. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Test Method and Effect for Antibacterial Capability of Paints Film. Available online: http://c.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/showGb?type=online&hcno=BD23209B12F6B07650FD542B0EB1456A (accessed on 1 October 2008).
  24. Zuo, Z.; Liao, R.; Zhao, X.; Song, X.; Qiao, Z.; Guo, C.; Zhuang, A.; Yuan, Y. Anti-frosting performance of superhydrophobic surface with ZnO nanorods. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 110, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perillo, P.M.; Atia, M.N.; Rodríguez, D.F. Effect of the reaction conditions on the formation of the ZnO nanostructures. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2017, 85, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Gaashani, R.; Radiman, S.; Daud, A.R.; Tabet, N.; Al-Douri, Y. XPS and optical studies of different morphologies of ZnO nanostructures prepared by microwave methods. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2283–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gallegos, M.V.; Peluso, M.A.; Thomas, H.; Damonte, L.C.; Sambeth, J.E. Structural and optical properties of ZnO and manganese-doped ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 689, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, H.; Song, Z.; Yang, L.; Wu, H. Synthesis Method of White Carbon Black Utilizing Water-Quenching Blast Furnace Slag. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 9645–9651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghotbi, M.Y. Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized ε-Zn(OH)2 and its decomposed product, nano-zinc oxide. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 491, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hubert, C.; Naghavi, N.; Canava, B.; Etcheberry, A. Zinc Sulfide Based Chemically Deposited Buffer Layers for Electrodeposited CIS Solar Cells. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 7–12 May 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nie, H.; He, A.; Zheng, J.; Xu, S.; Li, J.; Han, C.C. Effects of Chain Conformation and Entanglement on the Electrospinning of Pure Alginate. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 1362–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tai, Y.; Qian, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J. Study of surface modification of nano-SiO2 with macromolecular coupling agent (LMPB-g-MAH). Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 141, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g001 550
Figure 1. Micrographs of (a,c) amorphous SiO2 and (b) pure ZnO.
Figure 1. Micrographs of (a,c) amorphous SiO2 and (b) pure ZnO.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g001
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g002 550
Figure 2. Preparation of composite particles of ZnO–SiO2 precursor.
Figure 2. Preparation of composite particles of ZnO–SiO2 precursor.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g002
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD of (a) amorphous SiO2; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; and (c) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Figure 3. XRD of (a) amorphous SiO2; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; and (c) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g003
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of ZnO–SiO2 and corresponding mapping results.
Figure 4. SEM images of ZnO–SiO2 and corresponding mapping results.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g004
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM maps of (a) amorphous SiO2; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; (c) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 at different scales.
Figure 5. TEM maps of (a) amorphous SiO2; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; (c) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 at different scales.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g005
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS of (a) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Figure 6. XPS of (a) ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0; (b) ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g006
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g007 550
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of amorphous SiO2, Zn–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, Zn–SiO2-pH7.0, and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of amorphous SiO2, Zn–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, Zn–SiO2-pH7.0, and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g007
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g008 550
Figure 8. Synthesis of the ZnO–nSiO2 Complex
Figure 8. Synthesis of the ZnO–nSiO2 Complex
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g008
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g009 550
Figure 9. Antimicrobial tests of (a) blank control, (b) different concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 in agar medium, (c) different concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 in agar medium, (d) different concentrations of pure ZnO in agar medium.
Figure 9. Antimicrobial tests of (a) blank control, (b) different concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 in agar medium, (c) different concentrations of ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0 in agar medium, (d) different concentrations of pure ZnO in agar medium.
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g009
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g010 550
Figure 10. Effects of different additives on antibacterial rate (E. coli).
Figure 10. Effects of different additives on antibacterial rate (E. coli).
Nanomaterials 07 00217 g010
Table
Table 1. XRF of amorphous SiO2, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
Table 1. XRF of amorphous SiO2, ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0 and ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0.
SamplesSiO2/%ZnO/%Na2O/%
amorphous SiO296.6300.98
ZnO–SiO2-pH5.092.784.511.05
ZnO–SiO2-pH7.084.2211.262.68
Table
Table 2. Element analysis based on XPS results
Table 2. Element analysis based on XPS results
SamplesC1s (%)Zn2p (%)Si2p (%)O1s (%)O/Si
Amorphous SiO22.74031.2765.842.11
Zn–SiO2-pH5.06.182.2427.5562.042.25
ZnO–SiO2-pH5.03.482.4730.0363.682.12
Zn–SiO2-pH7.06.906.2424.3860.842.50
ZnO–SiO2-pH7.05.9610.5525.1858.392.31
Table
Table 3. MIC of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0, and pure ZnO.
Table 3. MIC of ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0, ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0, and pure ZnO.
MIC (mg/mL)ZnO–SiO2-pH5.0ZnO–SiO2-pH7.0ZnO
E. coli361920
E. coli (ZnO)1.602.1420

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Ding, H.; Sun, S. Preparation and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles Supported on Amorphous SiO2. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080217

AMA Style

Chen Y, Ding H, Sun S. Preparation and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles Supported on Amorphous SiO2. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(8):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ying, Hao Ding, and Sijia Sun. 2017. "Preparation and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles Supported on Amorphous SiO2" Nanomaterials 7, no. 8: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop