Next Article in Journal
Isothiocyanate-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Building Blocks for the Design of Nanovehicles with Optimized Drug Release Profile
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Purpose Nanovoid Array Plasmonic Sensor Produced by Direct Laser Patterning
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial Nanostructured Ti Coatings by Magnetron Sputtering: From Laboratory Scales to Industrial Reactors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Crystalline Microresonators of High Quality Factors with a Controllable Wedge Angle on Lithium Niobate on Insulator

1
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
2
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
4
The Extreme Optoelectromechanics Laboratory, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
5
Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(9), 1218; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091218
Submission received: 24 July 2019 / Revised: 25 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 August 2019 / Published: 29 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Printing of Nanophotonic Structures)

Abstract

:
We report the fabrication of crystalline microresonators of high quality (Q) factors with a controllable wedge angle on lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI). Our technique relies on a femtosecond laser assisted chemo-mechanical polish, which allows us to achieve ultrahigh surface smoothness as critically demanded by high Q microresonator applications. We show that by refining the polish parameters, Q factors as high as 4.7 × 107 can be obtained and the wedge angle of the LNOI can be continuously tuned from 9° to 51°.

1. Introduction

Whispering gallery microresonators (WGM) are miniaturized optical cavities where light waves can travel along the circular periphery with extremely low propagation losses by means of total internal reflection at the glass–air interface. So far, WGMs have been realized in various kinds of transparent materials such as liquids, polymers, glasses, semiconductors, and dielectric crystals [1,2,3]. The physical and/or optical functionalities demonstrated with WGMs include lasing, filtering, nonlinear wavelength conversion, optomechanics, and cavity electrodynamics, to name only a few [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Currently, it is of high interest to realize on-chip integration of the WGMs with other photonic micro- and nanostructures. The material platforms suitable for photonic integration application include traditional semiconductors for their fabrication compatibility with the complementary metal oxide semiconductor(CMOS) approach and the emerging lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI), thanks to the rapid development of innovative solutions to produce high quality LNOI photonic structures [10,11,12,13,14,15].
Very recently, we have demonstrated the fabrication of high Q LNOI microdisk resonators using chemo-mechanical polish lithography [16,17,18]. The Q factor was measured as 1.46 × 107 at a wavelength of around 773 nm. As a typical feature of chemo-mechanical polish, the fabricated microdisk showed an extended wedge at the rim of a wedge angle of ~9.5°. High Q microresonators have been used to demonstrate electric tunable optomechanics [19]. Nevertheless, for most WGM applications, it is always desirable to improve the Q factor and to have the capability of controlling the dispersion property with a tunable wedge angle. This provides a strong incentive for us to carry out systematic investigations into the optimizations of the Q factor and wedge angle by refining the fabrication parameters, which will be shown in detail below.

2. Experimental Details

In our investigation, the LNOI microdisks with variable diameters and wedge angles were produced on a commercially available X-cut LNOI wafer (NANOLN, Jinan Jingzheng Electronics Co. Ltd. Jinan, China). The lithium niobate (LN) thin film with a thickness of 900 nm was bonded to a 2 μm-thick SiO2 layer supported by a 500-μm-thick LN substrate.
As shown in Figure 1, the fabrication process includes four steps as briefly described as follows. (1) Deposition of a thin layer of chromium (Cr) with a thickness of 600 nm on the surface of the LNOI by magnetron sputtering. (2) Patterning of Cr film using femtosecond laser ablation. (3) Removing the uncovered LNOI by chemo-mechanical polishing. (4) Chemical wet etching to remove the Cr mask. The pulse energy of the femtosecond laser was carefully adjusted to enable the complete removal of the Cr film without damaging the underneath LNOI because the damage threshold of the LNOI is significantly higher than Cr under the irradiation of femtosecond laser pulses. The details in the femtosecond laser ablation are provided herein. We used a femtosecond laser with a center wavelength of 1030 nm and a pulse width of 170 fs (PHAROS, LIGHT CONVERSION) for patterning the Cr film at the average power of 0.1 mW. A 100× objective lens (M Plan Apo NIR, Mitutoyo Corporation, NA0.7, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan) was used to produce a tightly focused spot of ~1 μm in diameter.
In the CM polishing process using a wafer-polishing machine (NUIPOL802, Kejing, Inc.Hefei, China), the wedge angle can be controlled by changing the duration of the polishing process. More details of CM polishing can be found elsewhere [16,17].

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a shows a LNOI microdisk fabricated using a SiO2 slurry with a particle size of ~20 nm. The close-up view of the area indicated by the red rectangular frame is shown in Figure 2b, presented a smooth surface morphology in the optical micrograph. Figure 2c presents the atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the polished surface by which an ultralow surface roughness of Rq ~0.115 nm could be determined. The surface roughness was significantly lower than that reported in our previous work (Rq ~0.452 nm) due to the fact that the slurry with a particle size of ~60 nm was used previously [16]. Actually, we systematically examined the surface roughness with the particle size and found that a particle size of ~20 nm could give us the optimum surface roughness and a reasonable polish duration. Figure 2d exhibits all the microresonators with different diameters ranging from 55 μm to 205 μm. All of the microresonators showed a highly reproducible smooth surface morphology.
With a surface roughness to the order of Ra ~0.115, the major source of optical loss in the microresonator is radiative bending loss, which can be reduced by increasing the diameters of the microdisks. To confirm this, we measured the Q factor of each microresonator in Figure 2d. The results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 3a. Indeed, it can be seen that the Q factor does undergo an increase for the microdisks with diameters of 55 μm, 85 μm, and 105 μm. However, after the Q factor reached its peak, which was 4.7 × 107 obtained with the microdisk of a diameter of 105 μm, the Q factor decreased with the further increase of the diameter of the microdisk. It should be noted that to avoid the fluctuations of the measured Q factors resulting from the inconsistency in the fabrication process, we fabricated three samples for each diameter, and then made three measurements accordingly. The general trend in Figure 3a is therefore a reliable feature of the Q factor dependence on the microdisk diameter.
We attempted to understand the unexpected trend of the decreasing Q factor with the increasing microdisk diameter after the diameter of the microdisk reached 105 μm. To do so, we conducted simulations of the light fields (electric field) in the microdisks with different diameters but with the same wedge angle of 10°, and the thickness of the LN thin film was 900 nm. Note that we did not calculate the Q factors of the microdisks with different diameters as many key parameters (such as the exact diameter, thickness, and surface roundness of each microdisk) cannot be measured with absolute precision. The simulation results in Figure 4 revealed that with the increase in the diameter of the microdisk, the fundamental (Figure 4c–e) and high-order (Figure 4f–h) modes tended to penetrate more deeply toward the center of the microdisk. It is highly likely that the tail of the fundamental as well as high-order modes in the microdisks of large diameters may scratch the underneath pedestal supporting the freestanding microdisk, giving rise to a decrease in the Q factors. In our work, the diameter of the fused silica pedestal was controlled as ~20 μm less than that of the microdisk, otherwise the freestanding microdisk may collapse in the chemical wet etching to partially remove the fused silica. For this reason, some fused silica may remain unremoved on the backside of the microdisk during the short period of chemical wet etching, giving rise to a slight scattering loss and in turn, a slight decrease in the Q factors.
We also investigated the dependence of the wedge angle of the microdisk on the polish duration. In general, the longer the polishing process, the larger the wedge angle of the microdisk. Figure 5a–f show the microdisks with a diameter of 85 μm obtained with polish durations of 12 min, 16 min, 18 min, 24 min, 30 min, 42 min, and 60 min, respectively. Accordingly, the wedge angles of the microdisks in Figure 5a–f were measured as 9°, 14°, 22°, 30°, 40°, and 51°, respectively. The measured Q factors of the microdisks with different wedge angles are provided in Figure 5g. The Q factors showed almost no dependence on the wedge angle, and were significantly higher than 1 × 107 at all wedge angles.
Finally, we noticed that from the side-view image in Figure 6, the microdisks of large wedge angles obtained with long polish durations appeared to be composed of a microdisk with a vertical sidewall (see region I in Figure 6) stacked on top of another microdisk with an extended wedge (see region II in Figure 6). The thicknesses of region I and II were measured as 280 nm and 420 nm, respectively. In general, this should be caused by the mechanical interaction of the LNOI microdisks with the polishing cloth, whereas understanding the underlying details requires further investigations in a systematic manner. Nevertheless, such complex geometry may provide innovative opportunities of controlling light fields in the LNOI microdisk resonators.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, we demonstrated the optimization of the Q factor and wedge angle of LNOI microdisk resonators fabricated by femtosecond laser assisted chemo-mechanical polish. We achieved, to the best of our knowledge, a record-high Q factor of 4.7 × 107 by improving the surface smoothness and optimizing the diameter of the LNOI microdisk resonator. We showed that the wedge angle of the LNOI could be continuously tuned from 9° to 51° without spoiling the Q factor, which is critical for nonlinear optical applications as the dispersion curve in the microdisks is a function of the wedge angle. Thus, our results have important implications for applications ranging from classical and non-classical light sources to optical comb generation and optomechanics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C.; Methodology, Y.C.; Software, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang); Validation, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang) and Z.F.; Formal analysis, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang); Investigation, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang), J.L., and Z.F.; Resources, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang), M.W., Z.F., R.W., J.Z. (Junxia Zhou), R.G., and J.L.; Data curation, Z.F. and M.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. and J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang); Writing—review and editing, Y.C., J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang), M.W., J.L. R.G., and R.W.; Visualization, J.Z. (Jianhao Zhang), and M.W.; Supervision, Y.C.; Funding acquisition, Y.C. and J.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11734009, 11874375, 61590934, 11874154, 61505231, 11604351, 11674340, 61575211, 61675220, and 61761136006), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB16030300), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. QYZDJ-SSW-SLH010), the Project of Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (Grant No. 17JC1400400), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (Grant No. 17QA1404600), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0504400), and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 18PJ1403300).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vahala, K.J. Optical microcavities. Nature 2003, 424, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, X.F.; Zou, C.L.; Wang, L.; Gong, Q.; Xiao, Y.-F. Whispering-gallery microcavities with unidirectional laser emission. Laser Photonics Rev. 2016, 10, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, G.; Chembo, Y.K. Monolithic total internal reflection resonators for applications in photonics. Opt. Mater. X 2019, 2, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spillane, S.M.; Kippenberg, T.J.; Vahala, K.J. Ultralow-threshold Raman laser using a spherical dielectric microcavity. Nature 2002, 415, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Feng, S.; Lei, T.; Chen, H.; Luo, X.; Poon, A.W. Silicon photonics: From a microresonator perspective. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 6, 145–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kippenberg, T.J.; Vahala, K.J. Cavity optomechanics: Back-action at the mesoscale. Science 2008, 321, 1172–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Foreman, M.R.; Swaim, J.D.; Vollmer, F. Whispering gallery mode sensors. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2015, 7, 168–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lin, G.; Coillet, A.; Chembo, Y.K. Nonlinear photonics with high-Q whispering-gallery-mode resonators. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2017, 9, 828–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spillane, S.M.; Kippenberg, T.J.; Painter, O.J.; Vahala, K.J. Ideality in a fiber-taper-coupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 043902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lin, J.; Xu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Wang, M.; Song, J.; Wang, N.; Qiao, L.; Fang, W.; Cheng, Y. Fabrication of high-Q lithium niobate microresonators using femtosecond laser micromachining. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, J.; Bo, F.; Wan, S.; Li, W.; Gao, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Xu, J. High-Q lithium niobate microdisk resonators on a chip for efficient electro-optic modulation. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 23072–23078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Liang, H.; Luo, R.; He, Y.; Jiang, H.; Lin, Q. High-quality lithium niobate photonic crystal nanocavities. Optica 2017, 4, 1251–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boes, A.; Corcoran, B.; Chang, L.; Bowers, J.; Mitchell, A. Status and potential of lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for photonic integrated circuits. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018, 12, 1700256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, J.; Yao, N.; Hao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Mao, W.; Wang, M.; Chu, W.; Wu, R.; Fang, Z.; Qiao, L. Broadband quasi-phase-matched harmonic generation in an on-chip monocrystalline lithium niobate microdisk resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 173903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zheng, Y.; Fang, Z.; Liu, S.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, X. High-Q exterior whispering-gallery modes in a double-layer crystalline microdisk resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 253902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, R.; Zhang, J.; Yao, N.; Fang, W.; Qiao, L.; Chai, Z.; Lin, J.; Cheng, Y. Lithium niobate micro-disk resonators of quality factors above 107. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, R.; Wang, M.; Xu, J.; Qi, J.; Chu, W.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, J.; Qiao, L.; Chai, Z.; et al. Long low-loss-lithium niobate on insulator waveguides with sub-nanometer surface roughness. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, M.; Wu, R.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.; Fang, Z.; Chai, Z.; Cheng, Y. Chemo-mechanical polish lithography: A pathway to low loss large-scale photonic integration on lithium niobate on insulator. Quantum Eng. 2019, 1, e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, Z.; Haque, S.; Lin, J.; Wu, R.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhou, J.; Rafa, M.; Lu, T.; Cheng, Y. Real-time electrical tuning of an optical spring on a monolithically integrated ultrahigh Q lithium nibote microresonator. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (ad) Flowchart of fabricating an on-chip lithium niobate microdisk resonator.
Figure 1. (ad) Flowchart of fabricating an on-chip lithium niobate microdisk resonator.
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g001
Figure 2. (a) Top view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated LN microdisk resonator. (b) Close up view SEM image of the area indicated by the red box in (a). (c) Atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the microdisk wedge. (d) Optical microscope image of the microdisk resonator with different diameters (55 μm, 85 μm, 105 μm, 135 μm, 155 μm, 185 μm, and 205 μm).
Figure 2. (a) Top view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated LN microdisk resonator. (b) Close up view SEM image of the area indicated by the red box in (a). (c) Atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the microdisk wedge. (d) Optical microscope image of the microdisk resonator with different diameters (55 μm, 85 μm, 105 μm, 135 μm, 155 μm, 185 μm, and 205 μm).
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g002
Figure 3. (a) Measured Q factors of the mcirodisks of different diameters. (b) The Lorentz fitting (red curve) of a splitting mode in the microdisk with a diameter of 105 μm revealed a Q factor of 4.7 × 107.
Figure 3. (a) Measured Q factors of the mcirodisks of different diameters. (b) The Lorentz fitting (red curve) of a splitting mode in the microdisk with a diameter of 105 μm revealed a Q factor of 4.7 × 107.
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g003
Figure 4. Side view (a) and top view (b) of the structure of the simulated microdisk resonator. Electric field of the fundamental modes in the microdisk resonator with a diameter of (c) 50 μm, (d) 100 μm, and (e) 200 μm. Electric field of second-order modes in the microdisk resonator with a diameter of (f) 50 μm, (g) 100 μm, and (h) 200 μm. The modes show a general feature where the mode size becomes larger with the increasing order of mode.
Figure 4. Side view (a) and top view (b) of the structure of the simulated microdisk resonator. Electric field of the fundamental modes in the microdisk resonator with a diameter of (c) 50 μm, (d) 100 μm, and (e) 200 μm. Electric field of second-order modes in the microdisk resonator with a diameter of (f) 50 μm, (g) 100 μm, and (h) 200 μm. The modes show a general feature where the mode size becomes larger with the increasing order of mode.
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g004
Figure 5. (af) Side view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated LN microdisks with different wedge angles of 9°, 14°, 22°, 30°, 40°, and 51°, respectively. (g) Q factors of the microdisks with different wedge angles.
Figure 5. (af) Side view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated LN microdisks with different wedge angles of 9°, 14°, 22°, 30°, 40°, and 51°, respectively. (g) Q factors of the microdisks with different wedge angles.
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g005
Figure 6. Side view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated LN microdisk resonator with a long polish duration of 90 min.
Figure 6. Side view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated LN microdisk resonator with a long polish duration of 90 min.
Nanomaterials 09 01218 g006
Table 1. Q factors of the microdisks with different diameters.
Table 1. Q factors of the microdisks with different diameters.
DiameterQ-Factors (Sample i)Q-Factors (Sample ii)Q-Factors (Sample iii)
55 μm2.15 × 1072.26 × 1072.74 × 107
85 μm2.17 × 1072.51 × 1073.73 × 107
105 μm3.22 × 1074.16 × 1074.70 × 107
130 μm2.94 × 1073.32 × 1073.30 × 107
155 μm1.95 × 1072.76 × 1073.16 × 107
180 μm2.03 × 1072.07 × 1073.12 × 107
205 μm1.78 × 1071.92 × 1072.67 × 107

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Fang, Z.; Lin, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Wu, R.; Gao, R.; Cheng, Y. Fabrication of Crystalline Microresonators of High Quality Factors with a Controllable Wedge Angle on Lithium Niobate on Insulator. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091218

AMA Style

Zhang J, Fang Z, Lin J, Zhou J, Wang M, Wu R, Gao R, Cheng Y. Fabrication of Crystalline Microresonators of High Quality Factors with a Controllable Wedge Angle on Lithium Niobate on Insulator. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(9):1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jianhao, Zhiwei Fang, Jintian Lin, Junxia Zhou, Min Wang, Rongbo Wu, Renhong Gao, and Ya Cheng. 2019. "Fabrication of Crystalline Microresonators of High Quality Factors with a Controllable Wedge Angle on Lithium Niobate on Insulator" Nanomaterials 9, no. 9: 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop