Next Article in Journal
Translation Effects in Fluorine Doped Tin Oxide Thin Film Properties by Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapour Deposition
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Developments in Accelerated Antibacterial Inactivation on 2D Cu-Titania Surfaces under Indoor Visible Light
Previous Article in Journal
Gelatin-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Thiol-Ene Hybrid Coating for Metal Protection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecularly Imprinted Polymer/Metal Organic Framework Based Chemical Sensors

1
School of Public Health, Medical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400012, Romania
3
Key Laboratory of Pesticides and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430079, China
4
Flexible Display Mater. & Tech. Co-Innovation Center of Hubei, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
5
Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Chemical Materials and Devices of Ministry of Education, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
6
Institute of Analytical Sciences, University of Lyon, UMR-CNRS 5280, 5, Rue de La Doua, Villeurbanne 69100, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2016, 6(4), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040042
Submission received: 21 August 2016 / Accepted: 28 September 2016 / Published: 5 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Thin Films and Coatings)

Abstract

:
The present review describes recent advances in the concept of molecular imprinting using metal organic frameworks (MOF) for development of chemical sensors. Two main strategies regarding the fabrication, performance and applications of recent sensors based on molecularly imprinted polymers associated with MOF are presented: molecularly imprinted MOF films and molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using MOF as core. The associated transduction modes are also discussed. A brief conclusion and future expectations are described herein.

1. Introduction

The field of chemosensors and biosensors has experienced a constant expansion, with an increasing number of papers published in the last years regarding their development and applications [1]. Increasing attention has been given to the replacement of biological receptors with semisynthetic or synthetic receptors such as engineered proteins, aptamers and molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) [2,3,4,5,6], which offer a more stable, robust and cheap alternative for molecular recognition.
MIPs serve as synthetic receptors for a wide variety of molecules and are synthesized using molecular imprinting techniques. Molecular imprinting involves the use of functional monomers, cross-linkers and template molecules to create specific and selective cavities in a three-dimensional polymer network. The polymerization is performed in the presence of template molecules, represented by the analyte of interest, followed by the extraction of the template from the polymer matrix. The resulting cavities are complementary in shape and size with the template (target analyte) and offer interaction points and a coordination sphere around the target [7].
MIPs have been regarded as a promising substitute for their biological counterpart in various research fields such as chromatography [8,9,10], biotechnology [11], environmental science [12], food safety [13,14], biomedical sciences [15,16] and sensors design [17].
In recent years MIPs have found widespread application in the development of sensing devices, with an interdisciplinary research area occurring from combining sensors and MIPs [18,19,20]. The increasing interest in integrating MIPs in sensors is due to their unique properties, such as low cost, high stability, high selectivity, long storage time, reusability and tailorability for practically any target analyte.
The choice of appropriate component materials is of paramount importance, because it defines the recognition selectivity and sensitivity. Numerous materials, such as responsive polymers, lanthanide ion complexes [21], sol-gel–derived xerogels [22], carbon nanoparticles [23], silica particles [24], quantum dots [25,26], and metal, can be fused with MIPs in singular or multiple combinations. Metallic silver and gold particles are widely used as the core material due to their electronic properties and scattering/plasma behavior with respect to the light emitted. For example, Chen et al. [27] developed an imprinted recognition element for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) applications using silver nanoparticles. The hybrid system Ag@MIP showed extremely high SERS activity, detecting with high sensitivity the target molecules (Rhodamine B) and improving the signal-to-noise ratio and repeatability, with the overall SERS intensity being related to the densities of imprinted cavities in the MIP film.
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) metal complexes with organic linkers, such as carboxylates or phosphonates. First defined by Yaghi and co-workers in 1995 [28,29], following the pioneering work of Hoskins and Robson, MOFs are crystalline porous hybrid materials that contain coupling units (metal ions or metal-oxo units) coordinated by electron-donating organic ligands. A subgroup of MOFs that consist of pores with dimensions less than 2 nm is microporous metal organic frameworks (MMOFs). While they show similar adsorption properties as other porous materials capable of physisorption, the incorporation of metal centers enables them to interact with adsorbed hydrogen molecules more strongly to enhance hydrogen adsorption. Chen et al. [30] synthesized a MOF (MOF-505) based on the NbO topology, proving that the metal-oxide units and the organic ligands are important features for hydrogen binding. MOFs with aromatic ligands generally have a high specific surface area and large pore volume with a well-defined pore size, which had been proved to be effective through hydrogen and methane adsorption [31,32]. They are mainly used in gas storage, electrode materials for batteries, electrocatalysts for important reactions taking place in fuel cells or electrolyzers or electrode materials for supercapacitors.
MOFs have attracted increasing interest in recent years as highly sensitive platforms for the development of sensors [33,34]. The use of MOFs is extensive, due to their numerous architecture properties: stable framework, ultra-high porosity, large internal surface area, pore volume, wide range of thermal and chemical stability, non-toxic nature, luminescent nature and chemical functionality. Selectivity of recognition has been obtained through covalent grafting of a specific receptor molecule on the MOF skeleton for the selective luminescent detection of parathion [35].
MOF-based sensors including a molecularly imprinted structure are a new, emerging research field. Currently only a few papers have been reported in the literature leading to promising results and opening paths for the development of a new generation of sensors. Thus, the review herein focuses on promising recent advances in MIP sensors using MOFs. Two main strategies regarding the fabrication, performance and applications of recent MIP-MOF sensors are presented: molecularly imprinted MOF films and molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core.

2. Sensors Based on Molecularly Imprinted MOF Thin Films

This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

2.1. Fabrication of Molecularly Imprinted MOF Thin Films

An important step for the fabrication of MIP sensors is the selection of the most appropriate functional monomer to yield interactions with the template molecules. The monomer:template ratio should be carefully optimized to eliminate the heterogeneity in the distribution of the imprinted cavities and to improve the quality of the signal. Bisaniline-crosslinked gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as a general MOF have received increased attention recently [36]. The generic protocol consisted of the synthesis of AuNPs functionalized with p-aminothiophenol, followed by electropolymerization of p-aminothiophenol-functionalized AuNPs in the presence of a template molecule. The template was then extracted from the polymer matrix, resulting in selective recognition sites for the analyte of interest. Several template molecules have been investigated such as estradiol [37], aflatoxin B1 [38], 1,3,5-trinitrotoluene [39], gemcitabine [40], glyphosate [41] and tetracycline [42]. These studies followed several steps for the fabrication of selective recognition cavities for the analytes of interest, which are summarized below: computational design, polymerization and removal of the template molecules.
In order to select an appropriate functional monomer, theoretical calculations were used to assess conformational and chemical complementarities between the template and functional monomers in different ratios. It was found that π–donor–acceptor interactions naturally play a significant role in facilitating complex formations and in achieving high stability. For example, one property of nitroaromatics, such as 1,3,5-trinitrotoluene, which may be exploited in detection schemes is their electron-accepting capability [43]. Substitution of the electron-withdrawing nitro groups on the aromatic ring lowers the energy of the empty orbitals, thereby making these compounds good electron acceptors. Conjugated polymers such as p-aminothiophenol are promising candidates for redox sensing because they are electron donors [44].
The polymerization of MIP-MOF has been achieved by electrochemical deposition. MIP-based sensors may sometimes deliver poor signal quality, due to the variation in the distance of the imprinted cavities from the surface of sensor. In order to avoid this problem and to enhance the signal, researchers have focused on developing ultra-thin polymeric films on the sensor surface by electrodeposition. Electrodeposition enables the formation of polymers directly onto electrode surfaces and has turned out to be promising and versatile in controlling film thickness, forming firmly adhered films, and tuning film electrochemical properties [39]. Thus, in order to obtain thin polymeric films, cyclic voltammetry was employed. The electropolymerization was carried out in a solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]−3/−4 in PBS (pH 7.2) containing 0.1 mg/mL p-aminothiophenol-functionalized AuNPs and 0.1 mg/mL template solution, by cycling the potential from −0.35 V to +0.80 V vs. SCE (Saturated Calomel Electrode), at a scan rate of 100 mV/s, for 10 cycles [27,35,36,37,38]. In the case of estradiol, the electropolymerization was carried out from −0.35 to 0.60 V, in order to avoid the oxidation of estradiol which occurs at 0.60 V [35]. The porogen solvent plays an important role in designing MIPs; thus, different organic solvents (e.g., acetone, ethanol) were added to the electropolymerization solution to assure the solubility of the template and to reduce the surface tension since most MIPs are hydrophobic. The modified electrodes were then washed with appropriate extraction solvents for 20 to 60 min in order to remove the imprinted molecules and adsorbates on the surface of the film, triggering the formation of selective recognition cavities in the MIP film. Selecting an appropriate organic solvent in molecular imprinting is not guided only by the solubility of the template, but mainly by the stability of the pre-polymerization complex and the target porosity of the MIP, which is why this solvent used is also called a porogen.
The schematic principle of the fabrication of this molecularly imprinted MOF sensor for template molecule detection is presented in Figure 1.
As seen above, the protocol for developing electrochemical sensors by direct electropolymerization of the monomer on the transducer is simpler and faster, avoiding the need for lengthy and complex synthesis steps. Moreover, the imprinted film thickness is easily controlled through the chosen electrochemical parameters: potential range, scan rate, number of cycles.

2.2. Electrochemical Sensors Based on Molecularly Imprinted MOF Thin Films

Once the template has been entrapped during electropolymerization, as shown in Figure 1, the conditions for extraction should be optimized in terms of solvent composition and time of contact. After extraction of the template, the prepared MIP-modified electrodes were kept in solutions of different concentrations of target analytes, in order to investigate the uptake process for variable concentrations of analytes. Analytes are all electron acceptors due to their oxidizing properties. The electropolymerized polythioaniline, a conjugated polymer, is an electron donor. Its conductivity is increased when the template doping rate increases, leading to a p-doping of the conjugated polymer, due to charge delocalization.
Linear sweep voltammetry measurements in the presence of a redox probe (ferro/ferricyanide) show an increase in the current peak and a shift of the peak potentials to a more positive value potential with the increase of the concentration of the template, related to the binding of the analyte in the specific cavities. As the concentrations of template molecules in the imprinted film increases, the electron transfer rate increases. The shift of potentials to more positive values shows that the charge transfer process takes place more easily when template molecules are embedded in the film. The fabricated sensors were firstly applied for the detection of various concentrations of target analytes in buffered solutions. A linear relationship between the signal-blank/signal ratio and the logarithmic concentration of the analytes was obtained in each case. A linear range from fM to nM and a low limit of detection in the fM range was obtained for the MIP sensors. Compared to the MIP, the response currents of the NIP (Not Imprinted Polymer) did not change significantly with the concentration change, demonstrating the succesful formation of imprintig cavities in MIP films. The selectivity of the MIP sensors was also investigated towards the binding of structurally related compounds, proving excellent selectivity [37,38,39,40,41,42]. The observed sensitivities of detection can be classified as: 1,3,5-trinitrotoluene > estradiol > gemcitabine > aflatoxin B1 > tetracyclin > glyphosate; these different sensitivities are due to the different rates of doping, concerning the number of imprinted cavities and the charge transfer rate. Analytical performances are reported in Table 1.

3. Sensors Based on Molecularly Imprinted Core-Shell Nanoparticles Using MOF as a Core

Molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core have been successfully integrated in mass sensors. Qian et al. [45] reported a quartz microbalance (QCM) MIP sensor employing a type of MOF for the sensitive detection of metalocarb. The MOF MIL-101 was used as a support for synthesizing MIP via a sol-gel process. Firstly, MIL-101 was chemically synthesized from Cr(NO3)3·9H2O and terephthalic acid and used to synthesize MIL@MIP nanoparticles. MIL@MIP was synthesized by thermal polymerization in a solution of tetrahydrofuran containing MIL-101, the monomer (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, the cross-linker tetraethyl orthosilicate, the template metalocarb and acetic acid as a catalyst. The structure of the molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core is presented in Figure 2.
The suspension of MIL@MIP was then dropped onto the QCM surface and dried. The resulting core-shell nanoparticles exhibited an octahedral shape and were uniformly distributed in the polymer film. MIL-101 confers several advantages such as high chemical stability, high stability in water and high surface area.
The QCM sensor based on MIL-101@MIP was applied for the detection of metalocarb in pear juice. For this purpose adsorption studies were performed, showing that the frequency change was linear with the concentration of metalocarb in the range from 0.1 to 0.9 mg/L, with a detection limit of 0.0689 mg/L [45]. The analytical performance is reported in Table 1.
Molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core were also used in the development of optical sensors, improving their performance through the high surface area of the sensing surface. A fluorescence-based sensor was developed by Guo et al. [46] for the detection of hemoglobin using bovine hemoglobin as the template molecule, N-isopropyl acrylamide as the temperature-sensitive functional monomer and N,N-methylene bisacrylamide as the cross-linker. Cu3(BTC)2 was used as a representative of the MOF and upconversion nanoparticles were used as fluorescence materials. The upconversion nanoparticles were synthesized by a solvothermal reaction and functionalized with polyacrylic acid. The MOF composite was prepared by the solvothermal reaction of copper nitrate, H3BTC and polyacrylamide-modified upconversion nanoparticles in ethanol. The MOF composite was added in the polymerization mixture containing the template hemoglobin, monomer and cross-linker and the polymerization was carried out at 25 °C for 5 h. The template was then extracted by washing with TRIS buffer, the complete extraction being investigated by UV-vis spectrometry. The rebinding of the template was investigated by fluorescence spectrometry, and fluorescence quenching was being observed upon the binding of the template.
The MOF@MIP optical sensor developed by Guo et al. [46] was applied for the detection of hemoglobin. The recognition capability of the imprinted MOF@MIP material was evaluated through the change of the fluorescence signal of the hybrid material at various concentrations of hemoglobin ranging from 0 to 0.6 mg/mL, with a detection limit of 0.062 mg/mL. Specificity studies of the binding of other proteins have also been performed and the sensor exhibited good selectivity for the recognition of hemoglobin. The analytical performance is reported in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

MOF-based molecularly imprinted sensors have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Few MIP/MOF sensors have been developed in the last couple of years and applied for the detection of various analytes of biomedical or environmental interest. Novel porous hybrid MIP/MOF materials have been coupled with electrochemical, optical and mass transducers, resulting in sensors with high sensitivity and selectivity for the analyte of interest. The developed MIP/MOF sensors featured improved thermal stability, improved water compatibility and stability and a high adsorption rate through their high surface area. Among these sensors, electrochemical MIP/MOF sensors prepared by electropolymerization on conductive substrates exhibit high sensitivity and excellent selectivity in complex matrices. Moreover, the imprinted film thickness is easily controlled through the chosen electrochemical parameters: potential range, scan rate, number of cycles. Molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core were used for mass and optical transduction. The obtained specific surface area is very large, leading to a very large dynamic range.
Although intensive research in the field of MOF-MIP sensors is still needed, the promising results obtained in the field so far open doors for developing cheap and sensitive on-site sensors. In the future, developing MIP biosensors based on MOFs with high stability and long shelf-life is surely an attractive route for designing sensitive, low-cost sensors for many practical applications. They offer many advantages such as high adsorption ability and high transfer rate through their increased surface area due to the MOFs, high selectivity, high chemical and thermal stability, long shelf-life and reusability through MIP, coupled with the high sensitivity of electrochemical, optical and gravimetric methods.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank EC (European Commission) for financial support through the Marie Curie NANODEV Grant No318524. Zhenzhong Guo thanks the “ChuTian Scholar” Project Award support, Hubei Province, China.

Author Contributions

Zhenzhong Guo, Anca Florea, Mengjuan Jiang, Yong Mei and Weiying Zhang, (Bibliography, Drafting the article), Robert Săndulescu, Aidong Zhang and Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault (Revising the article for intellectual content).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vigneshvar, S.; Sudhakumari, C.C.; Senthilkumaran, B.; Prakash, H. Recent Advances in Biosensor Technology for Potential Applications—An Overview. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Whitcombe, M.J.; Kirsch, N.; Nicholls, I.A. A functional monomer is not enough: Principal component analysis of the influence of template complexation in pre-polymerization mixtures on imprinted polymer recognition and morphology. J. Mol. Recognit. 2014, 27, 297–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zeng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kong, L.; Zhou, T.; Shi, G. A novel composite of SiO2-coated graphene oxide and molecularly imprinted polymers for electrochemical sensing dopamine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 45, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wackerlig, J.; Lieberzeit, P.A. Molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles in chemical sensing–Synthesis, characterisation and application. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2015, 207, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Y.; Qu, Z.B.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, T.; Shi, G. A novel composite of graphene quantum dots and molecularly imprinted polymer for fluorescent detection of paranitrophenol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 52, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Da Silva, M.; Viveiros, R.; Bonifácio, V.D.B.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A.; Casimiro, T. Supercritical fluid technology as a new strategy for the development of semi-covalent molecularly imprinted materials. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5075–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haupt, K.; Mosbach, K. Molecularly imprinted polymers and their use in biomimetic sensors. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2495–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Du, X.; Sun, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Yu, A.; Zhang, H.; et al. Determination of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in environmental water samples based on magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 662, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Soares da Silva, M.; Vão, E.R.; Temtem, M.; Mafra, L.; Caldeira, J.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A.; Casimiro, T. Clean synthesis of molecular recognition polymeric materials with chiral sensing capability using supercritical fluid technology. Application as HPLC stationary phases. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 1742–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lourenço, A.; Soares da Silva, M.; Casimiro, T.; Afonso, C.A.M. Isolation, analytical quantification and seasonal variation of labdanolic acid from the Portuguese-grown Cistus ladaniferus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 60, 226–232. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mattiasson, B.; Ye, L. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biotechnology; Series: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 150. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pichon, V.; Chapuis-Hugon, F. Role of molecularly imprinted polymers for selective determination of environmental pollutants—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 622, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Song, X.; Xu, S.; Chen, L.; Wei, Y.; Xiong, H. Recent advances in molecularly imprinted polymers in food analysis. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soares da Silva, M.; Viveiros, R.; Coelho, M.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A.; Correia, I.J.; Casimiro, T. Supercritical CO2-assisted preparation of a PMMA composite membrane for bisphenol A recognition in aqueous environment. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 68, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Puoci, F.; Cirillo, G.; Curcio, M.; Iemma, F.; Parisi, O.I.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Picci, N. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (PIMs) in Biomedical Applications, Biopolymers; Magdy Elnashar, M., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2010; Available online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/biopolymers/molecularly-imprinted-polymers-for-biomedical-applications (accessed on 21 August 2016). [CrossRef]
  16. Soares da Silva, M.; Viveiros, R.; Morgado, P.I.; Aguiar Ricardo, A.; Correia, I.J.; Casimiro, T. Development of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate-based molecular recognition devices for controlled drug delivery using supercritical fluid technology. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 416, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Javanbakht, M.; Fard, S.E.; Mohammadi, A.; Abdouss, M.; Ganjali, M.R.; Norouzi, P.; Safaraliee, L. Molecularly imprinted polymer based potentiometric sensor for the determination of hydroxyzine in tablets and biological fluids. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 612, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, C.; Si, S.; Yang, Z. A highly selective photoelectrochemical biosensor for uric acid based on core–shell Fe3O4@C nanoparticle and molecularly imprinted TiO2. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 65, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tong, Y.; Li, H.; Guan, H.; Zhao, J.; Majeed, S.; Anjum, S.; Liang, F.; Xu, G. Electrochemical cholesterol sensor based on carbon nanotube @ molecularly imprinted polymer modified ceramic carbon electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 47, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, Y.K.; Cao, Y.Y.; Wang, X.M.; Fang, G.Z.; Wang, S. Prussian blue mediated amplification combined with signal enhancement of ordered mesoporous carbon for ultrasensitive and specific quantification of metolcarb by a three-dimensional molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Uzun, L.; Uzek, R.; Senel, S.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Chiral recognition of proteins having L-histidine residues on the surface with lanthanide ion complex incorporated-molecularly imprinted fluorescent nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 3432–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bagheri, H.; Piri-Moghadam, H. Electroentrapment of polyaniline in [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]trimethoxysilane-derived xerogel: A facile methodology towards molecularly imprinted xerogels. Chromatographia 2014, 77, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.; Fang, G.; Liu, G.; Pan, M.; Wang, X.; Kong, L.; He, X.; Wang, S. Electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer film via sol-gel technology and multi-walled carbon nanotubes-chitosan functional layer for sensitive determination of quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 47, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De Oliveira, F.M.; Segatelli, M.G.; Tarley, C.R. Hybrid molecularly imprinted poly(methacrylic acid-TRIM)-silica chemically modified with (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane for the extraction of folic acid in aqueous medium. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 59, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, H.; Zhou, K.; Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Sun, B. A novel quantum dots-labeled on the surface of molecularly imprinted polymer for turn-off optosensing of dicyandiamide in dairy products. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lourenço, A.; Viveiros, R.; Moro, A.; Lima, J.C.; Bonifácio, V.D.B.; Casimiro, T. Supercritical CO2-assisted synthesis of an ultrasensitive amphibious quantum dot-molecularly imprinted sensor. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63338–63341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, S.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Qi, J. A Ag-molecularly imprinted polymer composite for efficient surface-enhanced Raman scattering activities under a low-energy laser. Analyst 2015, 140, 3239–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yaghi, O.M.; Li, H. Hydrothermal Synthesis of a Metal-Organic Framework Containing Large Rectangular Channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10401–10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yaghi, O.M.; Li, G.; Li, H. Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal-organic framework. Nature 1995, 378, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, B.L.; Ockwig, N.W.; Millward, A.R.; Contreras, D.S.; Yaghi, O.M. High H2 adsorption in a microporous metal-organic framework with open metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4745–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Baati, T.; Allan, P.K.; Maurin, G.; Couvreur, P.; Férey, G.; Morris, R.E.; Serre, C. Metal-organic frameworks in biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2011, 112, 1232–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, J.R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.C. Metal-organic frameworks for separations. Chem. Rev. 2011, 112, 869–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, P.; Deep, A.; Kim, K.-H. Metal organic framework for sensing applications. TrAC 2015, 73, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yi, F.-Y.; Chen, D.; Wu, M.-K.; Han, L.; Jiang, H.-L. Chemical Sensors Based on Metal-Organic Frameworks. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumar, P.; Kim, K.-H.; Bansal, V.; Kumar, P.A.; Deep, A. Practical utilization of nanocrystal metal organic framework biosensor for parathion specific recognition. Microchem. J. 2016, 128, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Riskin, M.; Tel-Vered, R.; Bourenko, T.; Granot, E.; Willner, I. Imprinting of molecular recognition sites through electropolymerization of functionalized Au nanoparticles: Development of an electrochemical TNT sensor based on p-donor-acceptor interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9726–9733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Florea, A.; Cristea, C.; Vocanson, F.; Săndulescu, R.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Electrochemical sensor for the detection of estradiol based on electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polythioaniline film with signal amplification using gold nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 59, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, M.; Braiek, M.; Florea, A.; Chrouda, A.; Farre, C.; Bonhomme, A.; Bessueille, F.; Vocanson, F.; Zhang, A.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Aflatoxin B1 Detection Using a Highly-Sensitive Molecularly-Imprinted Electrochemical Sensor Based on an Electropolymerized Metal Organic Framework. Toxins 2015, 7, 3540–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Guo, Z.; Florea, A.; Cristea, C.; Bessueille, F.; Vocanson, F.; Goutaland, F.; Zhang, A.; Săndulescu, R.; Lagarde, F.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. 1,3,5-Trinitrotoluene detection by a molecularly imprinted polymersensor based on electropolymerization of amicroporous-metal-organic framework. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 960–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Florea, A.; Guo, Z.; Cristea, C.; Bessueille, F.; Vocanson, F.; Goutaland, F.; Dzyadevych, S.; Săndulescu, R.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Anticancer drug detection using a highly sensitive molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor based on an electropolymerized microporous metal organic framework. Talanta 2015, 138, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Do, M.H.; Florea, A.; Farre, C.; Bonhomme, A.; Bessueille, F.; Vocanson, F.; Tran-Thi, N.T.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Molecularly imprinted polymer based electrochemical sensor for the sensitive detection of glyphosate herbicide. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2015, 95, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bougrini, M.; Florea, A.; Cristea, C.; Săndulescu, R.; Vocanson, F.; Errachid, A.; Bouchikhi, B.; El Bari, N.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Development of a novel sensitive molecularly imprinted polymer sensor based on electropolymerization of a microporous-metalorganic framework for tetracycline detection in honey. Food Control 2016, 59, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Braganca, A.; Araujo, M.; Bonifácio, V.D.B. Polyurea dendrimer-perylene self-imprinted nanoshells for trace explosives detection. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2015, 32, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sharma, P.S.; Pietrzyk-Le, A.; D’Souza, F.; Kutner, W. Electrochemically synthesized polymers in molecular imprinting for chemical sensing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402, 3177–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Qian, K.; Deng, Q.; Fang, G.; Wang, J.; Pan, M.; Wang, S.; Pu, Y. Metal-organic frameworks supported surface-imprinted nanoparticles for the sensitive detection of metolcarb. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guo, T.; Deng, Q.; Fang, G.; Gu, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S. Upconversion fluorescence metal-organic frameworks thermosensitive imprinted polymer for enrichment and sensing protein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic principle of the fabrication of this molecularly imprinted MOF sensor for template molecule detection.
Figure 1. Schematic principle of the fabrication of this molecularly imprinted MOF sensor for template molecule detection.
Coatings 06 00042 g001
Figure 2. Structure of the molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core.
Figure 2. Structure of the molecularly imprinted core-shell nanoparticles using a MOF as core.
Coatings 06 00042 g002
Table 1. Analytical performances of MIP-MOF-based chemical sensors.
Table 1. Analytical performances of MIP-MOF-based chemical sensors.
TargetTransduction TypeReference
ElectrochemistryQuartz MicrobalanceFluorescence
Detection LimitDynamic RangeDetection LimitDynamic RangeDetection LimitDynamic Range
estradiol0.3 pg/L1 pg/L to 1 µg/L [37]
aflatoxin0.9 pg/L1 pg/L to 1 mg/L [38]
1,3,5-trinitrotoluene0.9 pg/L1 pg/L to 1 µg/L [39]
gemcitabine0.9 pg/L1.1 pg/L to 11.4 µg/L [40]
glyphosate0.8 pg/L1 pg/L to 1 µg/L [41]
tetracycline44.4 pg/L9 pg/L to 10 µg/L [42]
metalocarb 0.069 mg/L0.1–0.9 mg/L [45]
hemoglobine 0.062 mg/mL0–0.6 mg/mL[46]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, Z.; Florea, A.; Jiang, M.; Mei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, A.; Săndulescu, R.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer/Metal Organic Framework Based Chemical Sensors. Coatings 2016, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040042

AMA Style

Guo Z, Florea A, Jiang M, Mei Y, Zhang W, Zhang A, Săndulescu R, Jaffrezic-Renault N. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer/Metal Organic Framework Based Chemical Sensors. Coatings. 2016; 6(4):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Zhenzhong, Anca Florea, Mengjuan Jiang, Yong Mei, Weiying Zhang, Aidong Zhang, Robert Săndulescu, and Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault. 2016. "Molecularly Imprinted Polymer/Metal Organic Framework Based Chemical Sensors" Coatings 6, no. 4: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop