Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids from Oregano: Occurrence, Biological Activity and Health Benefits
Previous Article in Journal
Dead Pericarps of Dry Fruits Function as Long-Term Storage for Active Hydrolytic Enzymes and Other Substances That Affect Germination and Microbial Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flavonoids and Ellagitannins Characterization, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities of Phyllanthus acuminatus Vahl
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1-Dependent Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis

Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher Str 47B, 50674 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2017, 6(4), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6040065
Submission received: 2 November 2017 / Revised: 2 December 2017 / Accepted: 16 December 2017 / Published: 20 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Flavonoids)

Abstract

:
The flavonoid composition of various tissues throughout plant development is of biological relevance and particular interest for breeding. Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1 (AtTTG1) is an essential regulator of late structural genes in flavonoid biosynthesis. Here, we provide a review of the regulation of the pathway’s core enzymes through AtTTG1-containing R2R3-MYELOBLASTOSIS-basic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX-WD40 repeat (MBW(AtTTG1)) complexes embedded in an evolutionary context. We present a comprehensive collection of A. thaliana ttg1 mutants and AtTTG1 orthologs. A plethora of MBW(AtTTG1) mechanisms in regulating the five major TTG1-dependent traits is highlighted.

1. Motivation

Flavonoids are secondary plant metabolites with a broad spectrum of functions for plants, including UV protection, pollination and feeding attraction, rhizosphere signaling and pathogen defense [1,2,3,4,5]. Early on, health-promoting effects of flavonoids were under investigation, and a mixture of flavonoids from citrus was initially named “vitamin P” by Szent-Györgyi in 1936 [6].
Generations of researchers have been attracted by flavonoids, their function and the regulation of their biosynthesis pathways. Potential health-promoting benefits for human nutrition, as well as medical topics like binding and inhibition of proteins, absorption, conversion and localization within the human body were in the focus of more than 70% of flavonoid reviews. Apart from these, two major types of topics dominated other reviews since 1964: (1) the substances themselves (e.g., lists of substances, identification of individual substances, chemical properties, synthesis and conversion, analytical methodology, composition in specific species, tissues and developmental stages) and (2) their function (e.g., functions tested in vitro, like radical scavenging, functions in plants like UV protection and functions related to the plant′s environment like exudate signaling within the rhizosphere, pathogen defense, pollination or feeding attraction).
Different types of flavonoids are known to have different functions (e.g., [3,7,8,9,10]). Therefore, when it comes to breeding efforts, understanding the varying flavonoid composition of specific plant organs throughout development is of utmost relevance. So far, only a few reviews have centered on specific aspects of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway’s regulation through plant development.

Where We Are and Where to Go?

Screening for plants with deviating coloration of plant organs facilitated the identification of the core pathway’s enzymes and essential regulators. These mutant sets, combined with sequencing technology, have already answered the “Who is who?” and “Who does what?” questions for the flavonoid biosynthesis core pathway (e.g., summarized in [11,12,13,14,15,16]).
We can now specify and ask “Who does what, where, when and why?” It is important to note that the functional spatiotemporal focus moves the gene function of regulators and their own regulation to center stage. AtTTG1 (Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1) is one of these regulators. With the AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network, it acts as a regulatory hub, differentially modulating spatiotemporal flavonoid composition of plant tissues throughout development and is an excellent example for such concerted regulatory mechanisms.
Moving away from solved “yes-no” scenarios of the past, in which the identified defective factor of a mutant would block the whole downstream pathway (e.g., of A. thaliana tt (transparent testa) mutants), it will now be important to complement these findings with more subtle, but relevant modifications of the pathway, e.g., accessible through natural variation studies. At the same time, gene function and regulation should be linked not only with individual substances, but also with flavonoid composition of specific plant organs in various species, which is of interest for plant breeding purposes.
Flavonoids have been at the center of research for an impressive period of time by now. In the post-genomic era, novel questions can be asked, and the wealth of knowledge that stems from research in the well-established model species A. thaliana can be extended to other species. This requires and allows for an embedding of previous findings in an evolutionary context to drive future research projects and to link different areas of research.
Towards this end, this review provides a small contribution with a focus on AtTTG1, the AtTTG1-dependent regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis and an embedding into the evolutionary context. Moreover, this review provides an overview of comprehensive collections of A. thaliana ttg1 mutants and AtTTG1 orthologs.

2. Introduction

2.1. Flavonoid Biosynthesis Pathway

At the end of the last century, A. thaliana, an annual Brassicaceae with a small genome, emerged as the model organism for molecular geneticists. Its genome was the first sequenced genome of a flowering plant and was released in the year 2000 [17]. Extensive detailed knowledge about the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and its regulator stems from this workhorse of molecular genetics. Studies on this pathway in A. thaliana benefit from the fact that the core enzymes are only encoded by a single gene except for six copies for FLAVONOL SYNTHASE (FLS), out of which two were shown to be expressed [18,19].
The flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in A. thaliana comprises core substances from several groups: e.g., chalcones, flavanones, flavonols, anthocyanidins, flavan-3-ols and proanthocyanidins. There are a few thousand derivatives of these substances (for more details, see Figure 1 and, e.g., [12,20,21]; for a fingerprint of the flavonoid/aglycon composition of A. thaliana seeds and seedlings, see [22] and its supplement).
Flavonoids are widely distributed within the plant kingdom and can be found in bryophytes, vascular plants and spermatophytes. It is discussed that flavonoids initially evolved as regulators or messengers and then as UV protectants [23]. The early steps of the pathway are shared by mosses and, e.g., angiosperms and therefore thought to be of ancient origin. As both parts of the pathway have evolved separately, but have evolved for a long time, it might not be surprising to find both early and late biosynthesis of enzymes: specific and overlapping sets of regulators. AtTTG1-dependent regulation is predominantly specific for the late biosynthesis of enzymes.

2.2. Trait Complexity and the Evolution of Transcription Factor Families

With increased trait complexity in plant organisms, transcription factor gene families have expanded [28]. For bHLH (basic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX), as well as for many other transcription factors, a strong expansion accompanied the period of land invasion [29]. Transcription-associated proteins (TAPs) can be separated into transcription factors (like R2R3-MYB(MYELOBLASTOSIS (homolog)) or bHLH), binding cis-regulatory elements in a sequence-specific manner and transcription regulators (like TTG1) that are of relevance within gene regulatory networks, but do not necessarily bind DNA themselves [28]. The combinatorial control in transcription factor complexes with components from different transcription factor classes allowed the integration of different developmental and environmental signals for further trait diversification [30]. In agreement with this, transcription factor family expansion correlated with morphological complexity in land plant evolution. This was not the case for transcriptional regulators [28].
Within the AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network, the highest trait specificity is found for the R2R3-MYB factors (see the next section), indicating that these might have evolved the most towards specific adaptive traits. A reduced complexity is seen for bHLH factors with partially overlapping function. Differential complex composition of MBW(AtTTG1) complexes can explain the differential AtTTG1-dependent regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. In particular, differing DNA binding motif preferences of the respective R2R3-MYB components have been reported [31,32,33].

3. AtTTG1-Dependent Gene Regulatory Network

AtTTG1 is the head of an evolutionarily-conserved gene regulatory network, regulating five AtTTG1-dependent traits with adaptive value for the plant: (1) trichome and (2) root hair patterning, (3) accumulation of anthocyanidin (and its derivatives) (in seedlings), (4) seed coat pigmentation and (5) seed coat differentiation including mucilage production (Figure 2). Differential MBW(AtTTG1) complex composition underlies the regulation of the five major traits [15,20,34,35,36,37,38].
MBW(AtTTG1) complexes consist of three classes of proteins: R2R3-MYB, bHLH and the WD40 repeat protein TTG1. Complexes of higher order are possible due to the homo- and heterodimerization of bHLH proteins [40,42,58]. The highest specificity of the trait regulation by MBW(AtTTG1) complexes exists on the level of the R2R3-MYB factors, while the bHLH factors act redundantly towards the different traits, and AtTTG1 is indispensable for all five traits. While we focus on the flavonoid biosynthesis in this review, we would like to point to previous reviews covering the role of AtTTG1 in trichome and root hair patterning (e.g., [59,60]). AtTTG1 has also been positioned in the seed coat mucilage pathway [61].

4. The Components of MBW(AtTTG1) Complexes

4.1. R2R3-MYBs

MYB proteins are found in all eukaryotic organisms [62,63]; first identified in the v-myb oncogene of the avian myeloblastoma virus, later in the human proto-oncogene c-myb and other related factors. MYB proteins in general contain up to three imperfect repeats: R1, R2 and R3 with R2 and R3 representing the minimum DNA-binding domain and containing cooperative recognition helices [62,64,65,66,67]. Few plant 4R-MYB proteins are reported (e.g., in soy bean) [68,69,70]. R2R3-MYB proteins are the most abundant plant-specific MYB proteins [63,65,66,71]. A consensus motif is present in all R2R3-MYB domains from A. thaliana [72]. The first cloned plant MYB gene was Colorless1 (C1) from maize (Zea mays) that regulates anthocyanin accumulation [73]. c1 was the gene disrupted in McClintock’s experiments (e.g., [74]) underlying her discovery of transposable elements. Several reviews have focused on plant MYB transcription factors in general, specific MYB pathways’ regulation or species (see e.g., [32,69,70,75,76,77,78,79,80,81])

4.2. bHLHs

Plant bHLH proteins of subgroup IIIf and MYB proteins containing the bHLH interaction motif [DE]Lx2[RK]x3Lx6Lx3R directly interact [46]. Subgroup IIIf bHLH proteins are already present in mosses [29]. Similar to R2R3-MYB proteins, the first cloned plant bHLH proteins originated from maize. In 1989, the R (Red 1) and B (Booster 1) genes were cloned [82,83].
The bHLH motif was first discovered and described in murine muscle development transcription factors and found to mediate dimerization and DNA binding [84]. It consists of a basic region at the N-terminus that binds specific DNA motives and an HLH region that mainly forms homo- and hetero-dimers with bHLH proteins [85]. Several reviews have focused on plant bHLH transcription factors in general and in specific pathways (see, e.g., [81,86,87]).

4.3. WDRs—TTG1

WD40 repeat (WDR) proteins are conserved in eukaryotes [88]. They have evolved in plants in various protein families with diverse functions: e.g., signal transduction, cytoskeletal dynamics, chromatin modification or transcriptional regulation [88]. This is in part due to diversification of regulators and targets up- and downstream the WDR proteins that act as interaction platform, constituents for protein complexes and sites of transient protein contacts [88]. WDR proteins are characterized by different numbers of WD40 repeats (usually 4–10 in plants) [88]. WDR proteins share a stretch of about 40 amino acids that usually end with Trp-Asp (WD) in each WD40 repeat [89]. Four and more WD40 repeats in one protein can form so-called β-propellers, a cylindrical formed series of four-stranded antiparallel beta sheets [88,90]. In the mammalian G-protein subunit Gβ, it is shown that the first and last WD 40 repeat contribute to the same beta-blade [90]. There are 237 WDR proteins with more than four repeats in A. thaliana [88], including TTG1, CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) and the four SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105 (SPA) proteins [34,91,92,93].
TTG1 sequences were known to be present in angiosperms, but not in gymnosperms and older plant lines [31]. This requires an update, as recently, an ortholog has been identified from Norway spruce (Picea abies) [94]. For an overview of (putative) AtTTG1 orthologs, see Section 9 of this review.

5. AtTTG1 Mutants

A. thaliana mutants of AtTTG1 were fundamental in elucidating its gene and proteins functions. One of the often used and stronger mutants is ttg1-1, which carries a mutation leading to a premature stop codon and thereby to a truncation of the AtTTG1 protein at its far C-terminus. A closer view of the AtTTG1 gene and protein structure will help to understand the relevance of the C-terminus for AtTTG1.
In AtTTG1 loss-of-function mutants, leaves are glabrous as no trichomes are formed, ectopic root hairs are additionally produced, seeds are yellow instead of brownish, seedlings do not accumulate anthocyanidin and the columella, as well as the mucilage of seed coat epidermal cells is missing.
Both flavonoid-related AtTTG1-dependent traits, anthocyanidin accumulation and seed coat pigmentation melt down to a differential regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. The TTG1 syndrome of ttg1 mutants varies in dependence of the position and type of mutation. Table 1 lists 22 A. thaliana ttg1 mutants and the observed flavonoid-related pigmentation phenotype of seeds.
The position of the mutations within these mutants indicates that proper AtTTG1 function requires an intact C-terminus. In Gβ, the first and last WD40 repeat contribute to the same β-blade; a similar scenario might occur in AtTTG1. Together with the modeled 3D-structure of AtTTG1, this points to a high relevance of the C-terminus for the protein’s proper folding and domain structure (see Figure 3).
Interestingly, according to the reported insertion loci (Table 1; [105]), two of the activation tagging T-DNA insertions were shown to be located in intron 1. This might change the 3′UTR due to differential splicing and possible loss of the 3′UTR portion originating from exon 2 in the transcript (exon 1 includes the stop codon and the first nucleotide of the 3′UTR; exon 2 comprises the remaining 3′UTR; see Figure 3). Moreover, similar as recently reported for GLABRA3 (GL3) [112], the intron might have a regulatory function, which could be impaired by the T-DNA insertion (size of inserted T-DNA > 6 kb). A T-DNA insertion in the AtTTG1 intron might change the splicing, the 3’UTR and its function, transcript stability and movement properties. Furthermore, an effect of the activation tagging insert including 35S promoters and a possible additional transcript is possible.
Helen A. Stafford described the differential accumulation of proanthocyanidin between plants with different developmental strategies. While abundant in gymnosperms and some ferns, proanthocyanidins are still found as defense compounds in leaves of long-lived woody plants, and they are rare in short-lived, herbaceous plants in which they are found in the seed coat of some of these [23]. In A. thaliana, seeds off ttg1 null mutants appear yellow due to the missing pigments [15]. They have a transparent testa. These pigments require the activity of DIHYDROFLAVONOL 4-REDUCTASE (DFR) and other downstream enzymatic steps [14]. These include LEUCOANTHOCYANIDIN DIOXYGENASE (LDOX)/ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE (ANS), ANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE (ANR)/BANYLUS (BAN) and, in other species, also LEUCOANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE (LAR) activity [20].

6. Target Enzymes of MBW(AtTTG1) Complexes in the Core Flavonoid Biosynthesis Pathway

Progress made in the last decade in differentiating target-specific activity of MBW(TTG1) complexes is diverse and uses different experimental systems (see previous reviews for a developmental and hormonal embedding [20,113,114]). In Figure 4, we combine exemplary results from at set of studies. These analyze the regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis’ core enzymes through differential sets of MBW(AtTTG1) components. The compilation highlights the need for systematic tissue-specific studies in this area of research. We apologize for all other examples not chosen here.
Many studies have focused on the regulation of DFR through MBW(AtTTG1) complexes. This is not surprising as no DFR is expressed in absence of AtTTG1 as shown in ttg1 mutants [14]. This leads to a complete blockage of the downstream pathway in these mutants [22]. On the level of bHLH factors, redundancy has been observed for AtTTG1-dependent traits. In this line, Zhang and co-workers observed a significantly reduced DFR expression as compared to the wildtype when analyzing seedlings. They also found a decrease of the DFR transcript level gl3egl3 double mutants and an even lower level in gl3egl3tt8 triple mutants (Figure 4, Study 1 [42]).
Further downstream, the pathway, BAN expression was modulated in young siliques that carried constructs overexpressing AtTTG1, TT8 and TT2, which were fused to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). These move into the nucleus upon dexamethasone (DEX) treatment. The increased BAN expression in these AtTTG1-GR and TT2-GR lines could be even more elevated when using cycloheximide (CHX) to block protein translation and thereby block secondary transcriptional effects possibly evoked by transcriptional activity of direct targets of AtTTG1 and TT2. This result was in contrast to TT8-GR induced BAN expression upon DEX treatment counteracted by CHX treatment suggesting a more complex regulation through TT8 (Figure 4, Study 2 [47]). In the same study, a strong induction by adding AtTTG1 to TT2-GL3/EGL3/TT8 dimer combinations was found. Here, A. thaliana protoplasts were used as the test system. Interestingly, TT2-EGL3 and TT2-TT8 did not require AtTTG1 for a significant induction of BAN transcription. MBW complexes with MYC1 could not activate the BAN promoter:GUS construct.
In one of the more comprehensive studies, mutants, promoter:GUS lines and GFP reporter constructs in the heterologous system Physcomitrella patens (protoplasts) were combined (Figure 4, Study 3 [115]). Most bHLH-PAP1/PAP2/TT2 dimers tested could activate DFR, LDOX or BAN in the absence of co-overexpressed AtTTG1 in P. patens or A. thaliana protoplasts with exceptions for TT2-MYC1 (DFR, BAN), TT2-GL3 (BAN) and TT2-TT8 for LDOX (Figure 4, Studies 2, 5–8 [46,47,116,117,118]). The selected studies cover TT2 dimers for DFR and BAN, PAP1 dimers for DFR and LDOX and PAP2 dimers for DFR. Endogenous proteins and low levels of AtTTG1 in the used protoplast might influence the results. Therefore, promoter binding studies will complement these results. First evidence of MYB-binding motives from Y1H studies is already available [33].
Xu and co-workers also acquired the expression of flavonoid biosynthetic genes in mutant background and compared it to the respective wildtype [115]. Not only the LBGs DFR, LDOX and BAN are downregulated in tt2, tt8 and ttg1 mutants, but also the EBGs F3H and F3’H in tt2 and ttg1 mutants. As MBW(AtTTG1) complexes affect transcriptional cascades, it is relevant to point out that direct activation of DFR, LDOX and again BAN is shown for AtTTG1-GR in siliques using the same DEX/CHX approach as described above. The regulation of F3’H is indirect for AtTTG1, but direct for GL3 (Figure 4, Study 4 [27]).
An important step towards understanding MBW(AtTTG1)-regulated flavonoid compositions will be tissue-specific studies using, e.g., promoter:GUS constructs for the pathways’ core enzymes as done for seeds [115]. Other important lines of experiments will be to bypass redundancies through systematic double and higher order mutants (e.g., [27,42]) and to analyze direct promoter binding.

7. MBW(AtTTG1) Complexes, Multilayered Regulatory Mechanisms at Work: A Possible Scenario

Atttg1 mutant analysis suggests that AtTTG1 is indispensable to regulate all AtTTG1-dependent traits in concert. It is assumed that AtTTG1, MYB and bHLH factors can form a ternary complex that acts as a transcriptional activator [31,35,38,119,120]. Interestingly, overexpression of the maize R gene in Atttg1 mutant background could rescue all AtTTG1-dependent traits [121]. It has also been shown that bHLH-R2R3-MYB-dimers can activate tested promoters [122]. This might also have been the ancient status, as, e.g., mosses possess type IIIf bHLH factors, but no functional TTG1 ortholog has been described to our knowledge [29,31]. GLABRA1 (GL1) and GL3 were shown to be able to activate CPC expression in Arabidopsis suspension cultures [122], and TT2 and TT8 overexpression is sufficient for BAN and LDOX activation, as well as PAP1 with EGL3 or TT8 for LDOX activation in A7 protoplasts, which express low levels of TTG1 according to the authors [47,117,118]. Therefore, the test system might not have been devoid of TTG1. Is this amount of putatively translated TTG1 sufficient to mediate a minimal required TTG1 function when the other factors are overexpressed? Here, studies in ttg1 mutant background are required. Since bHLH and an R2R3-MYB factor can activate transcription without TTG1, what is the function of TTG1? This has not been solved yet, and many aspects require further investigation. Other possible scenarios are described below (see Section 8).
One possible function of AtTTG1 might be to shield the bHLH and R2R3-MYB factor from (negative) regulators. AtTTG1 was shown to be localized at promoters (e.g., TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2 (TTG2) and CAPRICE (CPC)) by semi-quantitative PCR of ChIP experiments [123]. It might modulate the chromatin at the target promoter to set the stage for the other factors (early in development). It might also be directed to target promoters by non-MYB, non-bHLH interaction partners (e.g., TTG2 [51]) or the following scenario might (Figure 5) occur:
Instead of ternary complex formation and binding to the promoter as a complex, a R2R3-MYB factor binds to a specific promoter. It cannot activate the promoter on its own, at least this was shown for the AtDFR promoter and R2R2-MYB proteins of MBW(AtTTG1) complexes [46]. bHLH factors could dock to the WD40-platform TTG1 (Figure 5a). When the appropriate bHLH-TTG1 pair is available, it binds the R2R3-MYB factor, facilitated maybe by a bHLH binding motif at an appropriate distance, and the ternary complex is (at least transiently) formed (Figure 5b). Prior DNA binding of the R2R3-MYB factor might not be required. TTG1 possibly even dissociates again (Figure 5c), but was required for joining the bHLH-R2R3-MYB pair. This scenario also fits with the recently described mechanism of competition of TTG1 and GL1 for binding to GL3 [122].
The requirement of two transcription factors for target gene expression allows for integration of two or more signaling pathways through the regulation of protein abundance for both, the respective bHLH and R2R3-MYB factor. A third layer is added through the required presence of TTG1, which is needed in the scenario described above for initial complex formation. TTG1 might also be necessary to protect the bHLH factor from degradation or inactivation to achieve a threshold of molecules which jointly activate (with the respective MYB factor) the target gene′s transcription. Therefore, the rescue of ttg1 mutants overexpressing the R gene from maize could be explained if R is not selective towards its A. thaliana R2R3-MYB interaction partner. Moreover, its protein levels, due to the overexpression, are high enough to compete with the negative regulation of the non-endogenous R protein.
In the above-described scenario, the competitors of the R2R3-MYB proteins for bHLH binding, R3-MYB factors (e.g., [56]) that do not act as transcriptional activators, could act very efficiently: they might bind to the TTG1-bHLH dimer also prior to DNA-binding (Figure 5d), evoke TTG1 release and thereby subject the bHLH protein to its negative regulators, e.g., the ubiquitin ligase UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE 3 (UPL3)/KAKTUS [124]. The transcription of the target gene through an MBW(AtTTG1) complex is thereby counteracted.
The possible scenarios are still diverse and several might occur in different conditions, tissues and developmental stages. Many regulatory aspects are still to be uncovered for these well-investigated MBW(AtTTG1)-complexes. Careful hypothesis testing is required in the future and testing which mechanisms also apply for the other AtTTG1-dependent traits. Therefore, it is worth summarizing the regulatory mechanism stemming not only from work on the flavonoid-related AtTTG1-dependent traits. Which of these also act in flavonoid biosynthesis? Which evolved independently?

8. AtTTG1 and MBW(AtTTG1) Complexes: Modes of Regulation

Accumulating findings suggest that the AtTTG1-dependent regulation is more diverse than initially expected and point to a multilayered regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis core enzymes. The relevance of TTG1 as a regulatory hub is pointed out by a plethora of regulatory pathways and mechanisms regulating upstream, downstream TTG1 and even within MBW(AtTTG1) complexes. This diverse AtTTG1-dependent trait regulation seems to require up- and down-stream partners either within MBW(AtTTG1) complexes or additional partners. As transcriptional regulators like AtTTG1 are not expected to expand with organism complexity to the extent as transcription factor families like R2R3-MYB or bHLH factors do [28], regulatory mechanisms centered on TTG1 might be conserved between TTG1-dependent traits.
In the following, we are listing various modes of MBW(AtTTG1) regulation and provide example publications. On the level of bHLH/MYB factors, the relevance of post-translational modifications has been reviewed recently [125]. Many findings have extended the picture presented more than a decade ago, e.g., by Broun in 2005 [38], already suggesting some scenarios for which supportive results were found. Here, we do not differentiate between traits, as some of the mechanisms can be expected to be utilized for more than one trait, but this remains to be investigated in the future:
  • Differential complex formation (for an example of differential target regulation in seeds: [115]).
  • Insights from trichome and root hair patterning: activator/inhibitor and lateral inhibition, feedback loops’ de novo pattern formation (including cell-to-cell movement) [36,60,126,127].
  • Trapping and deletion model [48,128].
  • Competitors (R3-MYBs) [54,55,56,129,130].
  • Competition of TTG1 and an R2R3-MYB factor for binding to a bHLH factor [122].
  • Comparison of the ternary complex and bHLH-R2R3-MYBs activating target promoters [122].
  • Phosphorylation, e.g., of TTG1 through BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2 (BIN2) [49].
  • Spatiotemporal accumulation and regulation of MBW(AtTTG1) components themselves (e.g., reviewed for TT8 in [119]) [131].
  • Regulatory sequences in introns [112].
  • Not only AtGL3 is shown to bind directly to regulated promoters, but also AtTTG1 can bind to the TTG2 promoter [123].
  • Spatio-temporal expression of core enzymes and spatio-temporal accumulation of core substances throughout the developmental stages and in different tissues [11,20,131,132].
  • Protein stability and possible proteasomal-dependent degradation of MBW(AtTTG1) components: the proteasomal-dependent degradation of TTG1 [128] and other MBW(AtTTG1) components have been shown [124,133,134]. In particular, PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT (PAP)2 and PAP1 are potential targets of COP1/SPA complexes that target transcription factors for proteasomal degradation [134]. Therefore, protein stability in dependence of light might have a regulatory influence on MBW(AtTTG1) complexes within flavonoid biosynthesis regulation [134]. UPL3 has been identified to mediate the proteasomal degradation of GL3 and ENHANCER OF GLABRA3 (EGL3) [124].
  • Interaction with other proteins that are putative up- or down-stream modulators of MBW(AtTTG1) complex activity: e.g., interaction of TRANSPARENT TESTA1 (TT1) with TRANSPARENT TESTA2 (TT2) and PAP1, TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF1 (TCP)3 with R2R3-MYB factors and TTG2, SPL4, SPL5, BIN2, GEM or AT3G03960 with TTG1 [49,50,51,52,53,135,136,137]. Apart from post-translational modifications, interactors might interfere with MBW(AtTTG1) complex formation, lead to alternative complex formation and affect the MBW(AtTTG1) transcriptional activity as suggested for the TTG1-SPL4/5 and TTG2 interactions [51,52].
  • Multilayered upstream (environmental) regulation, e.g., in the frame of sucrose and hormone signaling pathways [113].
To transfer this wealth of knowledge not only from trait to trait, but also between species, an evolutionary embedding of MBW(AtTTG1) components (here, emphasis on AtTTG1) is required.

9. AtTTG1: Evolutionary Embedding and Functional Orthologs

The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway is found in a wide range of land plants, even in the bryophytes (mosses), and it has been suggested that synthesis of flavones, flavanones and flavonols may have evolved, first, to provide chemical messengers and then UV sunscreens [10,23]. Maize (Zea mays), petunia (Petunia hybrida) and snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) emerged as the major models for the study of flavonoid biosynthesis, and genes encoding R2R3-MYB and bHLH proteins were identified as regulators of flavonoid structural genes, demonstrating broad conservation of this regulatory mechanism in these plants [121,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]. By then, the relationship between WDR proteins and the R2R3-MYB/bHLH transcriptional regulators had not been revealed. The first anthocyanin regulatory locus that was cloned from petunia, AN11, encodes a protein containing five WD40 repeats [149]. Further support for the formation of an MBW complex in plants came from interaction studies conducted in A. thaliana [40]. Similarly, the maize WDR PAC1 is specifically involved in the flavonoid pathway, but can complement all ttg1 phenotypes in A. thaliana, and it became the first identified TTG1-like protein in monocots [138,150]. Later, WDR proteins were found to regulate the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in other plants such as Arabis alpina, Perilla frutescens, Ipomoea nil, Medicago truncatula, Malus domestica and many others (see Figure 6 and Table 2) [138,151,152,153,154,155].
Regularly, new orthologs are identified, which might be of relevance for breeding purposes. Not only are allelism tests and rescue experiments within the respective species conducted (if applicable) to explore the ortholog’s function, when mutants or TTG1 variants are identified. More often, the function of the orthologs is estimated by using the model species A. thaliana. In cross-species rescue experiments, TTG1 orthologs from other species are expected to take over AtTTG1 function at least in part within respective MBW(TTG1) complexes. This year, for example, ectopic expression of SiTTG1 (a newly identified AtTTG1 ortholog in Setaria italica) in the A. thaliana ttg1-13 background was shown to fully rescue the glabrous trichome and the flavonoid phenotype. This suggests that SiTTG1 is a member of flavonoid biosynthesis regulators in monocots [156]. Another example is BrTTG1, which was isolated from a brown-seeded hairy Brassica rapa and found to functionally complement an A. thaliana ttg1 mutant, while another ortholog, isolated from Brassica rapa yellow-seeded glabrous germplasm, was not functional [157].
It needs to be mentioned that promoter sequences and MBW components might have differentially evolved in the respective other species and thereby led to shifts in MBW(TTG1) function. Nevertheless, newly-identified orthologs also provide novel insights into the evolutionary aspects of MBW(TTG1)s.
MBW complexes have been identified as common and conserved flavonoid biosynthesis regulators, similarly reported for various land plants; although in several cases, not all components have been identified or characterized (Figure 6 and Table 2). Recently, MBW complexes (PaWD40-1-PabHLH1/2-PaMYB29/32/33/35) were characterized in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and shown to be involved in the regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway [94]. This reveals a full MBW regulator in gymnosperms, which were previously thought to be devoid of TTG1 orthologs [31].
MBW complexes determine the spatiotemporal expression of flavonoid biosynthesis target genes that account for tissue-specific accumulation of flavonoids. Some MBW complexes from monocots can control the expression of enzymes of the entire pathway, while others specifically control late flavonoid biosynthesis genes in eudicots [158]. Nevertheless, the bHLH interaction motif ([DE]Lx2[RK]x3Lx6Lx3R) found in R2R3-MYB members of MBW complexes is highly conserved among higher plant species [125], suggesting that at least MYB and bHLH interactions arose early during the event of land plant evolution.
Interestingly, in the rosid clade, besides regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, combinatorial MBW complexes evolved several extra functions: for instance, trichome patterning, root hair patterning and seed coat mucilage production in A. thaliana [41,42,43,45,128,160,161,162,163,164,165] or Arabis alpina [155] and seed hair formation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) [166,167,168,169]. These observations imply that a common regulatory MBW module has been adapted for controlling specific epidermal cell fates in rosids.
However, such pleiotropic functions of MBW complexes have neither been observed in the asterid clade nor in monocots. Based on this, a speculation is raised: new roles of MBW complexes in controlling epidermal cell fate may have diverged since the evolutionary separation of these major plant groups, although the details of this are still not clear [170,171]. This is supported by the findings that multicellular trichome and conical cell formation in asterids, like Antirrhinum and Solanaceae species, are regulated by MIXTA-like R2R3-MYB-related proteins in which the bHLH interaction motif ([DE]Lx2[RK]x3Lx6Lx3R) is devoid. MIXTA gene overexpression in rosids does not affect trichome formation [171,172,173]. AtGL1, a trichome patterning specific-R2R3-MYB protein, was grouped phylogenetically together with AtPAP and AtTT2 that act in the regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. This clade is distinct from the MIXTA-like regulators branch [72,174,175]. It is assumed that duplication and subsequent divergence, as known for other protein families [28], has been the driving force to evolve new roles of MBW complexes and other epidermal cell fates in rosids as compared to asterids [174].
Such divergence might have been revealed in Beta vulgaris where the dominating pigment is betalain [176]. Betalain accumulation was shown to be regulated through BvMYB1 (gene at the beet Y locus), an R2R3-MYB factor. The authors speculate that this can be seen as an evolutionary event allowing betalains to functionally replace anthocyanidins [177]. Molecular evolution seems to have occurred. Similar to the AmMIXTA R2R3-MYB-related protein, BvMYB1 cannot interact with bHLH proteins. When mutating the interaction motif to the consensus plus an additionally conserved amino acid, bHLH interaction was reconstituted [177]. With the genomic sequence, RNAseq data and functional categorization at hand, a deeper insight into the changes and evolution of protein binding, as well as cis regulatory motives is to be expected in the future [178].

10. Perspective

“Who does what, where, when and why?” There is constant progress in understanding the spatiotemporal regulation mediated by MBW(TTG1) complexes in the model species A. thaliana, but also in fruits and crops. Understanding changing flavonoid compositions, e.g., for the benefit of pre- and post-harvest fruit quality in dependence of developmental and environmental cues (see, e.g., [225,226]) includes understanding the activity of major regulators of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway like the MBW(TTG1) complexes. However, also biotechnological engineering of the flavonoid biosynthesis might benefit from recent findings on the pathways’ regulation [116].
Why plants accumulate specific flavonoid compositions, especially a wide range of specific derivatives in different tissues throughout development, is still not fully understood, and the function of individual substances, as well as mixtures could be a central question driving future research.

11. Methods

Seven hundred and sixty reviews containing “flavonoid(s)” in the title were extracted with EndNote X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) from the PubMed and Web of Science databases in October 2017 and sorted by topic. The same databases were searched with EndNote X8 for an initial overview of literature related to TTG1/URM23 (search for full gene name and abbreviation in title/abstract/keywords). Additional references were manually selected. We apologize to any researcher who′s work on the topic this review could not cover.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hans-Peter Bollhagen for SEM picture acquisition, Siegfried Werth for photography and the anonymous peer-reviewers and the editor for their comments. We are grateful for corrections and comments on the manuscript from Lisa Stephan.

Author Contributions

Andrea Schrader wrote the manuscript. Bipei Zhang provided Figure 6, Table 2 and most of Section 9. Both authors read, corrected and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AaArabis alpina
AmAntirrhinum majus
AN (e.g., AN11)ANTHOCYANIN (e.g., ANTHOCYANIN11)
ANRANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE
ANSANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE
At, A. thalianaArabidopsis thaliana
BBOOSTER
BANBANYLUS
bHLHbasic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX
BIN2BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2
BoBrassica oleracea
BrBrassica rapa
C1COLORLESS1
ChIPChromatin Immunoprecipitation
ColColumbia
COP1CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1
CPCCAPRICE
DELDELILA
DFRDIHYDROFLAVONOL 4-REDUCTASE
EBGearly biosynthetic gene
EGL3ENHANCER OF GLABRA3
EMSEthyl methanesulfonate
EstEstland
ETCENHANCER OF TRY AND CPC1
FhFreesia hybrida
GEMGL2-EXPRESSION MODULATOR
gglabra
GhGossypium hirsutum
GL1GLABRA1
GL3GLABRA3
HlHumulus lupulus
InIpomoea nil
IN1INTENSIFIER1
JAFJOHNANDFRANCESCA
LAP1LEGUME ANTHOCYANIN PRODUCTION 1
LBGlate biosynthetic gene
LDOXLEUCOANTHOCYANIDIN DIOXYGENASE
LerLandsberg erecta
LjLotus japonicus
MdMalus domestica
MtMedicago truncatula
MUTMUTABILIS
MYBMYELOBLASTOSIS (homolog)
MYBLMYB-like
MYBPAMYB transcription factors regulating PA synthesis
MYCMYELOCYTOMATOSIS (homolog)
NtNicotiana tabacum
OsOryza sativa
P1PERICARP COLOR1
PaPicea abies
PAC1PALE ALEURONE COLOR1
PAPPRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT
PARPROANTHOCYANIDIN REGULATOR
PAsproanthocyanidins
PfPerilla frutescens
PhPetunia hybrida
PHpH
PLPURPLE LEAF
PmPicea mariana
PpPhyscomitrella patens
PpPrunus persica
PtPinus taeda
PtrPopulus trichocarpa
RRED
RHL1ROOT HAIRLESS1
RLCRED LEAF COTTON
ROSROSEA
RSLROOT HAIRT DEFFECTIVE SIX-LIKE
SiSetaria italica
SPASUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105
SPLSQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE
TAPTRANSCRIPTION-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN
TCPTEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF1
TCLTRICHOMELESS
T-DNAtransfer-DNA
TRYTRIPTYCHON
tttransparent testa
TT1TRANSPARENT TESTA1
TT2TRANSPARENT TESTA2
TT8TRANSPARENT TESTA8
TTG1TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1
TTG2TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 2
UPL3UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE 3
URM23UNARMED23
UTRuntranslated region
VEVENOSA
VvVitis vinifera
WDRWD40 repeat
WERWEREWOLF
ZmZea mays

References

  1. Carletti, G.; Nervo, G.; Cattivelli, L. Flavonoids and Melanins: A common strategy across two kingdoms. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iwashina, T. Flavonoid function and activity to plants and other organisms. Biol. Sci. Space 2003, 17, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hassan, S.; Mathesius, U. The role of flavonoids in root-rhizosphere signalling: Opportunities and challenges for improving plant-microbe interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3429–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Falcone Ferreyra, M.L.; Rius, S.P.; Casati, P. Flavonoids: Biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Friedman, M. Overview of antibacterial, antitoxin, antiviral, and antifungal activities of tea flavonoids and teas. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. RusznyÁK, S.T.; Szent-GyÖRgyi, A. Vitamin P: Flavonols as Vitamins. Nature 1936, 138, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopez-Lazaro, M. Distribution and biological activities of the flavonoid luteolin. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cushnie, T.P.; Lamb, A.J. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cushnie, T.P.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Appelhagen, I.; Thiedig, K.; Nordholt, N.; Schmidt, N.; Huep, G.; Sagasser, M.; Weisshaar, B. Update on transparent testa mutants from Arabidopsis thaliana: Characterisation of new alleles from an isogenic collection. Planta 2014, 240, 955–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Saito, K.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Nakabayashi, R.; Higashi, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis: Structural and genetic diversity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 72, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bowerman, P.A.; Ramirez, M.V.; Price, M.B.; Helm, R.F.; Winkel, B.S. Analysis of T-DNA alleles of flavonoid biosynthesis genes in Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shirley, B.W.; Kubasek, W.L.; Storz, G.; Bruggemann, E.; Koornneef, M.; Ausubel, F.M.; Goodman, H.M. Analysis of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant J. 1995, 8, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Koornneef, M. The complex syndrome of ttg mutants. Arab. Inf. Serv. 1981, 18, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Koornneef, M. Mutations affecting the testa colour in Arabidopsis. Arab. Inf. Serv. 1990, 27, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaul, S.; Koo, H.L.; Jenkins, J.; Rizzo, M.; Rooney, T.; Tallon, L.J.; Feldblyum, T.; Nierman, W.; Benito, M.I.; Lin, X.; et al. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796–815. [Google Scholar]
  18. Preuss, A.; Stracke, R.; Weisshaar, B.; Hillebrecht, A.; Matern, U.; Martens, S. Arabidopsis thaliana expresses a second functional flavonol synthase. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1981–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Owens, D.K.; Alerding, A.B.; Crosby, K.C.; Bandara, A.B.; Westwood, J.H.; Winkel, B.S. Functional analysis of a predicted flavonol synthase gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1046–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lepiniec, L.; Debeaujon, I.; Routaboul, J.M.; Baudry, A.; Pourcel, L.; Nesi, N.; Caboche, M. Genetics and biochemistry of seed flavonoids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 405–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chopra, S.; Hoshino, A.; Boddu, J.; Iida, S. Flavonoid Pigments as Tools in Molecular Genetics. In The Science of Flavonoids; Grotewold, E., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 147–173. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaegle, B.; Uroic, M.K.; Holtkotte, X.; Lucas, C.; Termath, A.O.; Schmalz, H.G.; Bucher, M.; Hoecker, U.; Hulskamp, M.; Schrader, A. A fast and simple LC-MS-based characterization of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway for few seed(ling)s. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stafford, H.A. Flavonoid evolution: An enzymic approach. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, J. Flavonoid transport mechanisms: How to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Appelhagen, I.; Nordholt, N.; Seidel, T.; Spelt, K.; Koes, R.; Quattrochio, F.; Sagasser, M.; Weisshaar, B. TRANSPARENT TESTA 13 is a tonoplast P3A-ATPase required for vacuolar deposition of proanthocyanidins in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant J. 2015, 82, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pelletier, M.K.; Burbulis, I.E.; Winkel-Shirley, B. Disruption of specific flavonoid genes enhances the accumulation of flavonoid enzymes and end-products in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 40, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Leavitt, J.M.; Lloyd, A.M. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008, 53, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lang, D.; Weiche, B.; Timmerhaus, G.; Richardt, S.; Riano-Pachon, D.M.; Correa, L.G.; Reski, R.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Rensing, S.A. Genome-wide phylogenetic comparative analysis of plant transcriptional regulation: A timeline of loss, gain, expansion, and correlation with complexity. Genome Biol. Evol. 2010, 2, 488–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pires, N.; Dolan, L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Singh, K.B. Transcriptional regulation in plants: The importance of combinatorial control. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Miller, J.C.; Chezem, W.R.; Clay, N.K. Ternary WD40 Repeat-Containing Protein Complexes: Evolution, Composition and Roles in Plant Immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Prouse, M.B.; Campbell, M.M. The interaction between MYB proteins and their target DNA binding sites. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kelemen, Z.; Sebastian, A.; Xu, W.; Grain, D.; Salsac, F.; Avon, A.; Berger, N.; Tran, J.; Dubreucq, B.; Lurin, C.; et al. Analysis of the DNA-Binding Activities of the Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor Family by One-Hybrid Experiments in Yeast. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Walker, A.R.; Davison, P.A.; Bolognesi-Winfield, A.C.; James, C.M.; Srinivasan, N.; Blundell, T.L.; Esch, J.J.; Marks, M.D.; Gray, J.C. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 1337–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ramsay, N.A.; Glover, B.J. MYB-bHLH-WD40 protein complex and the evolution of cellular diversity. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Balkunde, R.; Pesch, M.; Hulskamp, M. Trichome patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana from genetic to molecular models. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2010, 91, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Tominaga-Wada, R.; Ishida, T.; Wada, T. New insights into the mechanism of development of Arabidopsis root hairs and trichomes. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol 2011, 286, 67–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Broun, P. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis: A complex network of conserved regulators involved in multiple aspects of differentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chatr-Aryamontri, A.; Oughtred, R.; Boucher, L.; Rust, J.; Chang, C.; Kolas, N.K.; O’Donnell, L.; Oster, S.; Theesfeld, C.; Sellam, A.; et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D369–D379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Payne, C.T.; Zhang, F.; Lloyd, A.M. GL3 encodes a bHLH protein that regulates trichome development in Arabidopsis through interaction with GL1 and TTG1. Genetics 2000, 156, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Symonds, V.V.; Hatlestad, G.; Lloyd, A.M. Natural allelic variation defines a role for ATMYC1: Trichome cell fate determination. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, F.; Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Payne, C.T.; Lloyd, A. A network of redundant bHLH proteins functions in all TTG1-dependent pathways of Arabidopsis. Development 2003, 130, 4859–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kirik, V.; Lee, M.M.; Wester, K.; Herrmann, U.; Zheng, Z.; Oppenheimer, D.; Schiefelbein, J.; Hulskamp, M. Functional diversification of MYB23 and GL1 genes in trichome morphogenesis and initiation. Development 2005, 132, 1477–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liang, G.; He, H.; Li, Y.; Ai, Q.; Yu, D. MYB82 functions in regulation of trichome development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 3215–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bernhardt, C.; Lee, M.M.; Gonzalez, A.; Zhang, F.; Lloyd, A.; Schiefelbein, J. The bHLH genes GLABRA3 (GL3) and ENHANCER OF GLABRA3 (EGL3) specify epidermal cell fate in the Arabidopsis root. Development 2003, 130, 6431–6439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zimmermann, I.M.; Heim, M.A.; Weisshaar, B.; Uhrig, J.F. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J. 2004, 40, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Baudry, A.; Heim, M.A.; Dubreucq, B.; Caboche, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004, 39, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Balkunde, R.; Bouyer, D.; Hulskamp, M. Nuclear trapping by GL3 controls intercellular transport and redistribution of TTG1 protein in Arabidopsis. Development 2011, 138, 5039–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cheng, Y.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Y.; Ito, S.; Asami, T.; Wang, X. Brassinosteroids control root epidermal cell fate via direct regulation of a MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex by GSK3-like kinases. eLife 2014, 3, e02525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Caro, E.; Castellano, M.M.; Gutierrez, C. A chromatin link that couples cell division to root epidermis patterning in Arabidopsis. Nature 2007, 447, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pesch, M.; Dartan, B.; Birkenbihl, R.; Somssich, I.E.; Hulskamp, M. Arabidopsis TTG2 regulates TRY expression through enhancement of activator complex-triggered activation. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4067–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ioannidi, E.; Rigas, S.; Tsitsekian, D.; Daras, G.; Alatzas, A.; Makris, A.; Tanou, G.; Argiriou, A.; Alexandrou, D.; Poethig, S.; et al. Trichome patterning control involves TTG1 interaction with SPL transcription factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 92, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xu, X.M.; Wang, J.; Xuan, Z.; Goldshmidt, A.; Borrill, P.G.; Hariharan, N.; Kim, J.Y.; Jackson, D. Chaperonins facilitate KNOTTED1 cell-to-cell trafficking and stem cell function. Science 2011, 333, 1141–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Digiuni, S.; Schellmann, S.; Geier, F.; Greese, B.; Pesch, M.; Wester, K.; Dartan, B.; Mach, V.; Srinivas, B.P.; Timmer, J.; et al. A competitive complex formation mechanism underlies trichome patterning on Arabidopsis leaves. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Feng, G.; Burleigh, J.G.; Braun, E.L.; Mei, W.; Barbazuk, W.B. Evolution of the 3R-MYB Gene Family in Plants. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 1013–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wester, K.; Digiuni, S.; Geier, F.; Timmer, J.; Fleck, C.; Hulskamp, M. Functional diversity of R3 single-repeat genes in trichome development. Development 2009, 136, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Heppel, S.C.; Jaffe, F.W.; Takos, A.M.; Schellmann, S.; Rausch, T.; Walker, A.R.; Bogs, J. Identification of key amino acids for the evolution of promoter target specificity of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin regulating MYB factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Feller, A.; Hernandez, J.M.; Grotewold, E. An ACT-like domain participates in the dimerization of several plant basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 28964–28974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pattanaik, S.; Patra, B.; Singh, S.K.; Yuan, L. An overview of the gene regulatory network controlling trichome development in the model plant, Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Schiefelbein, J.; Huang, L.; Zheng, X. Regulation of epidermal cell fate in Arabidopsis roots: The importance of multiple feedback loops. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. North, H.M.; Berger, A.; Saez-Aguayo, S.; Ralet, M.C. Understanding polysaccharide production and properties using seed coat mutants: Future perspectives for the exploitation of natural variants. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lipsick, J.S. The C-MYB story—Is it definitive? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17067–17068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kranz, H.; Scholz, K.; Weisshaar, B. c-MYB oncogene-like genes encoding three MYB repeats occur in all major plant lineages. Plant J. 2000, 21, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ogata, K.; Morikawa, S.; Nakamura, H.; Sekikawa, A.; Inoue, T.; Kanai, H.; Sarai, A.; Ishii, S.; Nishimura, Y. Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices. Cell 1994, 79, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sakura, H.; Kanei-Ishii, C.; Nagase, T.; Nakagoshi, H.; Gonda, T.J.; Ishii, S. Delineation of three functional domains of the transcriptional activator encoded by the c-myb protooncogene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 5758–5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Klempnauer, K.H.; Sippel, A.E. The highly conserved amino-terminal region of the protein encoded by the v-myb oncogene functions as a DNA-binding domain. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 2719–2725. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Klempnauer, K.H.; Gonda, T.J.; Bishop, J.M. Nucleotide sequence of the retroviral leukemia gene v-myb and its cellular progenitor c-myb: The architecture of a transduced oncogene. Cell 1982, 31, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Du, H.; Yang, S.S.; Liang, Z.; Feng, B.R.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.B.; Tang, Y.X. Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, J.; Osbourn, A.; Ma, P. MYB Transcription Factors as Regulators of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Braun, E.L.; Grotewold, E. Newly discovered plant c-myb-like genes rewrite the evolution of the plant myb gene family. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Stracke, R.; Werber, M.; Weisshaar, B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Paz-Ares, J.; Ghosal, D.; Wienand, U.; Peterson, P.A.; Saedler, H. The regulatory c1 locus of Zea mays encodes a protein with homology to myb proto-oncogene products and with structural similarities to transcriptional activators. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3553–3558. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Mc, C.B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1950, 36, 344–355. [Google Scholar]
  75. Seo, M.S.; Kim, J.S. Understanding of MYB Transcription Factors Involved in Glucosinolate Biosynthesis in Brassicaceae. Molecules 2017, 22, 1549. [Google Scholar]
  76. Roy, S. Function of MYB domain transcription factors in abiotic stress and epigenetic control of stress response in plant genome. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1117723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nakano, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Endo, H.; Rejab, N.A.; Ohtani, M. NAC-MYB-based transcriptional regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in land plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Baldoni, E.; Genga, A.; Cominelli, E. Plant MYB Transcription Factors: Their Role in Drought Response Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15811–15851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ambawat, S.; Sharma, P.; Yadav, N.R.; Yadav, R.C. MYB transcription factor genes as regulators for plant responses: An overview. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2013, 19, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Czemmel, S.; Heppel, S.C.; Bogs, J. R2R3 MYB transcription factors: Key regulators of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in grapevine. Protoplasma 2012, 249 (Suppl. S2), S109–S118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Feller, A.; Machemer, K.; Braun, E.L.; Grotewold, E. Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors. Plant J. 2011, 66, 94–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Grotewold, E.; Sainz, M.B.; Tagliani, L.; Hernandez, J.M.; Bowen, B.; Chandler, V.L. Identification of the residues in the Myb domain of maize C1 that specify the interaction with the bHLH cofactor R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13579–13584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ludwig, S.R.; Habera, L.F.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Wessler, S.R. Lc, a member of the maize R gene family responsible for tissue-specific anthocyanin production, encodes a protein similar to transcriptional activators and contains the myc-homology region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 7092–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Murre, C.; McCaw, P.S.; Baltimore, D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell 1989, 56, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Massari, M.E.; Murre, C. Helix-loop-helix proteins: Regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Goossens, J.; Mertens, J.; Goossens, A. Role and functioning of bHLH transcription factors in jasmonate signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1333–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ohashi-Ito, K.; Fukuda, H. Functional mechanism of bHLH complexes during early vascular development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 33, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Van Nocker, S.; Ludwig, P. The WD-repeat protein superfamily in Arabidopsis: Conservation and divergence in structure and function. BMC Genom. 2003, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Neer, E.J.; Schmidt, C.J.; Nambudripad, R.; Smith, T.F. The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins. Nature 1994, 371, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Smith, T.F.; Gaitatzes, C.; Saxena, K.; Neer, E.J. The WD repeat: A common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deng, X.W.; Matsui, M.; Wei, N.; Wagner, D.; Chu, A.M.; Feldmann, K.A.; Quail, P.H. COP1, an Arabidopsis regulatory gene, encodes a protein with both a zinc-binding motif and a G beta homologous domain. Cell 1992, 71, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hoecker, U.; Tepperman, J.M.; Quail, P.H. SPA1, a WD-repeat protein specific to phytochrome A signal transduction. Science 1999, 284, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Laubinger, S.; Hoecker, U. The SPA1-like proteins SPA3 and SPA4 repress photomorphogenesis in the light. Plant J. 2003, 35, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nemesio-Gorriz, M.; Blair, P.B.; Dalman, K.; Hammerbacher, A.; Arnerup, J.; Stenlid, J.; Mukhtar, S.M.; Elfstrand, M. Identification of Norway Spruce MYB-bHLH-WDR Transcription Factor Complex Members Linked to Regulation of the Flavonoid Pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Larkin, J.C.; Oppenheimer, D.G.; Lloyd, A.M.; Paparozzi, E.T.; Marks, M.D. Roles of the GLABROUS1 and TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA Genes in Arabidopsis Trichome Development. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Larkin, J.C.; Oppenheimer, D.G.; Marks, M.D. The GL1 gene and the trichome developmental pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 1994, 20, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Larkin, J.C.; Walker, J.D.; Bolognesi-Winfield, A.C.; Gray, J.C.; Walker, A.R. Allele-specific interactions between ttg and gl1 during trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1999, 151, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Rosso, M.G.; Li, Y.; Strizhov, N.; Reiss, B.; Dekker, K.; Weisshaar, B. An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 53, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Shikazono, N.; Tanaka, A.; Watanabe, H.; Tano, S. Rearrangements of the DNA in carbon ion-induced mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2001, 157, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Yoshida, Y.; Sano, R.; Wada, T.; Takabayashi, J.; Okada, K. Jasmonic acid control of GLABRA3 links inducible defense and trichome patterning in Arabidopsis. Development 2009, 136, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Bharti, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. Molecular characterization of transparent testa (tt) mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Estland) impaired in flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Taheri, A.; Gao, P.; Yu, M.; Cui, D.; Regan, S.; Parkin, I.; Gruber, M. A landscape of hairy and twisted: hunting for new trichome mutants in the Saskatoon Arabidopsis T-DNA population. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Robinson, S.J.; Tang, L.H.; Mooney, B.A.; McKay, S.J.; Clarke, W.E.; Links, M.G.; Karcz, S.; Regan, S.; Wu, Y.Y.; Gruber, M.Y.; et al. An archived activation tagged population of Arabidopsis thaliana to facilitate forward genetics approaches. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Weigel, D.; Ahn, J.H.; Blazquez, M.A.; Borevitz, J.O.; Christensen, S.K.; Fankhauser, C.; Ferrandiz, C.; Kardailsky, I.; Malancharuvil, E.J.; Neff, M.M.; et al. Activation tagging in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 1003–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). Available online: www.arabidopsis.org (accessed on 30 October 2017).
  106. Letunic, I.; Doerks, T.; Bork, P. SMART: Recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D257–D260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hulo, N.; Bairoch, A.; Bulliard, V.; Cerutti, L.; Cuche, B.A.; de Castro, E.; Lachaize, C.; Langendijk-Genevaux, P.S.; Sigrist, C.J. The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D245–D249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. The UniProt, Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D158–D169. [Google Scholar]
  110. Kelley, L.A.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.M.; Wass, M.N.; Sternberg, M.J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Guex, N.; Peitsch, M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2714–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Friede, A.; Zhang, B.; Herberth, S.; Pesch, M.; Schrader, A.; Hulskamp, M. The Second Intron Is Essential for the Transcriptional Control of the Arabidopsis thaliana GLABRA3 Gene in Leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Das, P.K.; Shin, D.H.; Choi, S.B.; Park, Y.I. Sugar-hormone cross-talk in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Mol. Cells 2012, 34, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Taylor, L.P.; Grotewold, E. Flavonoids as developmental regulators. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Xu, W.; Grain, D.; Bobet, S.; Le Gourrierec, J.; Thevenin, J.; Kelemen, Z.; Lepiniec, L.; Dubos, C. Complexity and robustness of the flavonoid transcriptional regulatory network revealed by comprehensive analyses of MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes and their targets in Arabidopsis seed. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Xu, W.; Lepiniec, L.; Dubos, C. New insights toward the transcriptional engineering of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e28736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Appelhagen, I.; Huep, G.; Lu, G.H.; Strompen, G.; Weisshaar, B.; Sagasser, M. Weird fingers: Functional analysis of WIP domain proteins. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 3116–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Appelhagen, I.; Jahns, O.; Bartelniewoehner, L.; Sagasser, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Stracke, R. Leucoanthocyanidin Dioxygenase in Arabidopsis thaliana: Characterization of mutant alleles and regulation by MYB-BHLH-TTG1 transcription factor complexes. Gene 2011, 484, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Xu, W.; Dubos, C.; Lepiniec, L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Hichri, I.; Barrieu, F.; Bogs, J.; Kappel, C.; Delrot, S.; Lauvergeat, V. Recent advances in the transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2465–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lloyd, A.M.; Walbot, V.; Davis, R.W. Arabidopsis and Nicotiana anthocyanin production activated by maize regulators R and C1. Science 1992, 258, 1773–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Pesch, M.; Schultheiss, I.; Klopffleisch, K.; Uhrig, J.F.; Koegl, M.; Clemen, C.S.; Simon, R.; Weidtkamp-Peters, S.; Hulskamp, M. TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 and GLABRA1 Compete for Binding to GLABRA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 584–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhao, M.; Morohashi, K.; Hatlestad, G.; Grotewold, E.; Lloyd, A. The TTG1-bHLH-MYB complex controls trichome cell fate and patterning through direct targeting of regulatory loci. Development 2008, 135, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Patra, B.; Pattanaik, S.; Yuan, L. Ubiquitin protein ligase 3 mediates the proteasomal degradation of GLABROUS 3 and ENHANCER OF GLABROUS 3, regulators of trichome development and flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 74, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pireyre, M.; Burow, M. Regulation of MYB and bHLH transcription factors: A glance at the protein level. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Meinhardt, H.; Gierer, A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays 2000, 22, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pesch, M.; Hulskamp, M. Creating a two-dimensional pattern de novo during Arabidopsis trichome and root hair initiation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004, 14, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bouyer, D.; Geier, F.; Kragler, F.; Schnittger, A.; Pesch, M.; Wester, K.; Balkunde, R.; Timmer, J.; Fleck, C.; Hulskamp, M. Two-dimensional patterning by a trapping/depletion mechanism: The role of TTG1 and GL3 in Arabidopsis trichome formation. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sawa, S. Overexpression of the AtmybL2 gene represses trichome development in Arabidopsis. DNA Res. 2002, 9, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Dubos, C.; Le Gourrierec, J.; Baudry, A.; Huep, G.; Lanet, E.; Debeaujon, I.; Routaboul, J.M.; Alboresi, A.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. MYBL2 is a new regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Xu, W.; Grain, D.; Le Gourrierec, J.; Harscoet, E.; Berger, A.; Jauvion, V.; Scagnelli, A.; Berger, N.; Bidzinski, P.; Kelemen, Z.; et al. Regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis involves an unexpected complex transcriptional regulation of TT8 expression, in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Routaboul, J.M.; Kerhoas, L.; Debeaujon, I.; Pourcel, L.; Caboche, M.; Einhorn, J.; Lepiniec, L. Flavonoid diversity and biosynthesis in seed of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2006, 224, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Patra, B.; Pattanaik, S.; Yuan, L. Proteolytic degradation of the flavonoid regulators, TRANSPARENT TESTA8 and TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1, in Arabidopsis is mediated by the ubiquitin/26Sproteasome system. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Maier, A.; Schrader, A.; Kokkelink, L.; Falke, C.; Welter, B.; Iniesto, E.; Rubio, V.; Uhrig, J.F.; Hulskamp, M.; Hoecker, U. Light and the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1/SPA control the protein stability of the MYB transcription factors PAP1 and PAP2 involved in anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 74, 638–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Appelhagen, I.; Lu, G.H.; Huep, G.; Schmelzer, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Sagasser, M. TRANSPARENT TESTA1 interacts with R2R3-MYB factors and affects early and late steps of flavonoid biosynthesis in the endothelium of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant J. 2011, 67, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Li, S.; Zachgo, S. TCP3 interacts with R2R3-MYB proteins, promotes flavonoid biosynthesis and negatively regulates the auxin response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013, 76, 901–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Li, S. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis: Fine-tuning of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e27522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Carey, C.C.; Strahle, J.T.; Selinger, D.A.; Chandler, V.L. Mutations in the pale aleurone color1 regulatory gene of the Zea mays anthocyanin pathway have distinct phenotypes relative to the functionally similar TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Spelt, C. Anthocyanin1 of Petunia Encodes a Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein That Directly Activates Transcription of Structural Anthocyanin Genes. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Albert, N.W.; Lewis, D.H.; Zhang, H.; Schwinn, K.E.; Jameson, P.E.; Davies, K.M. Members of an R2R3-MYB transcription factor family in Petunia are developmentally and environmentally regulated to control complex floral and vegetative pigmentation patterning. Plant J. 2011, 65, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Spelt, C.; Quattrocchio, F.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. ANTHOCYANIN1 of petunia controls pigment synthesis, vacuolar pH, and seed coat development by genetically distinct mechanisms. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2121–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Quattrocchio, F.; Wing, J.F.; van der Woude, K.; Mol, J.N.; Koes, R. Analysis of bHLH and MYB domain proteins: Species-specific regulatory differences are caused by divergent evolution of target anthocyanin genes. Plant J. 1998, 13, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Quattrocchio, F.; Verweij, W.; Kroon, A.; Spelt, C.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. PH4 of Petunia is an R2R3 MYB protein that activates vacuolar acidification through interactions with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors of the anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1274–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Hernandez, J.M.; Heine, G.F.; Irani, N.G.; Feller, A.; Kim, M.G.; Matulnik, T.; Chandler, V.L.; Grotewold, E. Different mechanisms participate in the R-dependent activity of the R2R3 MYB transcription factor C1. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 48205–48213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Cone, K.C.; Cocciolone, S.M.; Burr, F.A.; Burr, B. Maize anthocyanin regulatory gene pl is a duplicate of c1 that functions in the plant. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Goff, S.A.; Cone, K.C.; Chandler, V.L. Functional analysis of the transcriptional activator encoded by the maize B gene: Evidence for a direct functional interaction between two classes of regulatory proteins. Gene Dev. 1992, 6, 864–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Quattrocchio, F.; Wing, J.F.; Leppen, H.; Mol, J.; Koes, R.E. Regulatory Genes Controlling Anthocyanin Pigmentation Are Functionally Conserved among Plant Species and Have Distinct Sets of Target Genes. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1497–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Schwinn, K.; Venail, J.; Shang, Y.; Mackay, S.; Alm, V.; Butelli, E.; Oyama, R.; Bailey, P.; Davies, K.; Martin, C. A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 831–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. De Vetten, N.; Quattrocchio, F.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. The an11 locus controlling flower pigmentation in petunia encodes a novel WD-repeat protein conserved in yeast, plants, and animals. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 1422–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Selinger, D.A.; Chandler, V.L. A mutation in the pale aleurone color1 gene identifies a novel regulator of the maize anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Sompornpailin, K.; Makita, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. A WD-repeat-containing putative regulatory protein in anthocyanin biosynthesis in Perilla frutescens. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 50, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Morita, Y.; Saitoh, M.; Hoshino, A.; Nitasaka, E.; Iida, S. Isolation of cDNAs for R2R3-MYB, bHLH and WDR transcriptional regulators and identification of c and ca mutations conferring white flowers in the Japanese morning glory. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Brueggemann, J.; Weisshaar, B.; Sagasser, M. A WD40-repeat gene from Malus x domestica is a functional homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Pang, Y.; Wenger, J.P.; Saathoff, K.; Peel, G.J.; Wen, J.; Huhman, D.; Allen, S.N.; Tang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Tadege, M.; et al. A WD40 repeat protein from Medicago truncatula is necessary for tissue-specific anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis but not for trichome development. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1114–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chopra, D.; Wolff, H.; Span, J.; Schellmann, S.; Coupland, G.; Albani, M.C.; Schrader, A.; Hulskamp, M. Analysis of TTG1 function in Arabis alpina. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Liu, K.; Qi, S.; Li, D.; Jin, C.; Gao, C.; Duan, S.; Feng, B.; Chen, M. TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1 ubiquitously regulates plant growth and development from Arabidopsis to foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Plant Sci. 2017, 254, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Zhang, J.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Geng, J.; Chen, Y.; Cloutier, S.; McVetty, P.B.; Li, G. Map-based cloning and characterization of a gene controlling hairiness and seed coat color traits in Brassica rapa. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lai, Y.; Li, H.; Yamagishi, M. A review of target gene specificity of flavonoid R2R3-MYB transcription factors and a discussion of factors contributing to the target gene selectivity. Front. Biol. 2013, 8, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hedges, S.B.; Dudley, J.; Kumar, S. TimeTree: A public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2971–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Penfield, S.; Meissner, R.C.; Shoue, D.A.; Carpita, N.C.; Bevan, M.W. MYB61 Is Required for Mucilage Deposition and Extrusion in the Arabidopsis Seed Coat. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2777–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Morohashi, K.; Grotewold, E. A systems approach reveals regulatory circuitry for Arabidopsis trichome initiation by the GL3 and GL1 selectors. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Bruex, A.; Kainkaryam, R.M.; Wieckowski, Y.; Kang, Y.H.; Bernhardt, C.; Xia, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.Y.; Lee, M.M.; Benfey, P.; et al. A gene regulatory network for root epidermis cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, D.; Cui, S.; Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, L. A single amino acid substitution in IIIf subfamily of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor AtMYC1 leads to trichome and root hair patterning defects by abolishing its interaction with partner proteins in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 14109–14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Lee, M.M.; Schiefelbein, J. WEREWOLF, a MYB-Related Protein in Arabidopsis, Is a Position-Dependent Regulator of Epidermal Cell Patterning. Cell 1999, 99, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Gonzalez, A.; Mendenhall, J.; Huo, Y.; Lloyd, A. TTG1 complex MYBs, MYB5 and TT2, control outer seed coat differentiation. Dev. Biol. 2009, 325, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Liu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, T. The R3-MYB gene GhCPC negatively regulates cotton fiber elongation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Humphries, J.A.; Walker, A.R.; Timmis, J.N.; Orford, S.J. Two WD-repeat genes from cotton are functional homologues of the Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 (TTG1) gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gao, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yi, K.; Zhao, X.; Cui, M.L. The promoter structure differentiation of a MYB transcription factor RLC1 causes red leaf coloration in Empire Red Leaf Cotton under light. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Shangguan, X.X.; Yang, C.Q.; Zhang, X.F.; Wang, L.J. Functional characterization of a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor GhDEL65 from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Physiol. Plant. 2016, 158, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Martin, C.; Glover, B.J. Functional aspects of cell patterning in aerial epidermis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Brockington, S.F.; Alvarez-Fernandez, R.; Landis, J.B.; Alcorn, K.; Walker, R.H.; Thomas, M.M.; Hileman, L.C.; Glover, B.J. Evolutionary analysis of the MIXTA gene family highlights potential targets for the study of cellular differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 526–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Glover, B.J.; Perez-Rodriguez, M.; Martin, C. Development of several epidermal cell types can be specified by the same MYB-related plant transcription factor. Development 1998, 125, 3497–3508. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Payne, T.; Clement, J.; Arnold, D.; Lloyd, A. Heterologous myb genes distinct from GL1 enhance trichome production when overexpressed in Nicotiana tabacum. Development 1999, 126, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  174. Serna, L.; Martin, C. Trichomes: Different regulatory networks lead to convergent structures. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Albert, N.W.; Davies, K.M.; Lewis, D.H.; Zhang, H.; Montefiori, M.; Brendolise, C.; Boase, M.R.; Ngo, H.; Jameson, P.E.; Schwinn, K.E. A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 962–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Lloyd, A.; Brockman, A.; Aguirre, L.; Campbell, A.; Bean, A.; Cantero, A.; Gonzalez, A. Advances in the MYB-bHLH-WD Repeat (MBW) Pigment Regulatory Model: Addition of a WRKY Factor and Co-option of an Anthocyanin MYB for Betalain Regulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Hatlestad, G.J.; Akhavan, N.A.; Sunnadeniya, R.M.; Elam, L.; Cargile, S.; Hembd, A.; Gonzalez, A.; McGrath, J.M.; Lloyd, A.M. The beet Y locus encodes an anthocyanin MYB-like protein that activates the betalain red pigment pathway. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Stracke, R.; Holtgrawe, D.; Schneider, J.; Pucker, B.; Sorensen, T.R.; Weisshaar, B. Genome-wide identification and characterisation of R2R3-MYB genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Sainz, M.B.; Grotewold, E.; Chandler, V.L. Evidence for direct activation of an anthocyanin promoter by the maize C1 protein and comparison of DNA binding by related Myb domain proteins. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Chandler, V.L.; Radicella, J.P.; Robbins, T.P.; Chen, J.; Turks, D. Two regulatory genes of the maize anthocyanin pathway are homologous: Isolation of B utilizing R genomic sequences. Plant Cell 1989, 1, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Burr, F.A.; Burr, B.; Scheffler, B.E.; Blewitt, M.; Wienand, U.; Matz, E.C. The maize repressor-like gene intensifier1 shares homology with the r1/b1 multigene family of transcription factors and exhibits missplicing. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Sakamoto, W.; Ohmori, T.; Kageyama, K.; Miyazaki, C.; Saito, A.; Murata, M.; Noda, K.; Maekawa, M. The Purple leaf (Pl) Locus of Rice: The PlW Allele has a Complex Organization and Includes Two Genes Encoding Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Hu, J.; Reddy, V.S.; Wessler, S.R. The rice R gene family: Two distinct subfamilies containing several miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 42, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Furukawa, T.; Maekawa, M.; Oki, T.; Suda, I.; Iida, S.; Shimada, H.; Takamure, I.; Kadowaki, K. The Rc and Rd genes are involved in proanthocyanidin synthesis in rice pericarp. Plant J. 2007, 49, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Li, Y.; Shan, X.; Gao, R.; Yang, S.; Wang, S.; Gao, X.; Wang, L. Two IIIf Clade-bHLHs from Freesia hybrida Play Divergent Roles in Flavonoid Biosynthesis and Trichome Formation when Ectopically Expressed in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 30514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Martin, C.; Prescott, A.; Mackay, S.; Bartlett, J.; Vrijlandt, E. Control of anthocyanin biosynthesis in flowers of Antirrhinum majus. Plant J. 1991, 1, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Tamagnone, L.; Merida, A.; Parr, A.; Mackay, S.; Culianez-Macia, F.A.; Roberts, K.; Martin, C. The AmMYB308 and AmMYB330 transcription factors from antirrhinum regulate phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthesis in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Shang, Y.; Venail, J.; Mackay, S.; Bailey, P.C.; Schwinn, K.E.; Jameson, P.E.; Martin, C.R.; Davies, K.M. The molecular basis for venation patterning of pigmentation and its effect on pollinator attraction in flowers of Antirrhinum. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Bai, Y.; Pattanaik, S.; Patra, B.; Werkman, J.R.; Xie, C.H.; Yuan, L. Flavonoid-related basic helix-loop-helix regulators, NtAn1a and NtAn1b, of tobacco have originated from two ancestors and are functionally active. Planta 2011, 234, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Nesi, N.; Debeaujon, I.; Jond, C.; Pelletier, G.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. The TT8 gene encodes a basic helix-loop-helix domain protein required for expression of DFR and BAN genes in Arabidopsis siliques. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1863–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Baudry, A.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. TT8 controls its own expression in a feedback regulation involving TTG1 and homologous MYB and bHLH factors, allowing a strong and cell-specific accumulation of flavonoids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2006, 46, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Teng, S.; Keurentjes, J.; Bentsink, L.; Koornneef, M.; Smeekens, S. Sucrose-specific induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis requires the MYB75/PAP1 gene. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1840–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Cominelli, E.; Gusmaroli, G.; Allegra, D.; Galbiati, M.; Wade, H.K.; Jenkins, G.I.; Tonelli, C. Expression analysis of anthocyanin regulatory genes in response to different light qualities in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Jin, H.; Cominelli, E.; Bailey, P.; Parr, A.; Mehrtens, F.; Jones, J.; Tonelli, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C. Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 6150–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Feyissa, D.N.; Lovdal, T.; Olsen, K.M.; Slimestad, R.; Lillo, C. The endogenous GL3, but not EGL3, gene is necessary for anthocyanin accumulation as induced by nitrogen depletion in Arabidopsis rosette stage leaves. Planta 2009, 230, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Qiu, J.; Sun, S.; Luo, S.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Liu, S. Arabidopsis AtPAP1 transcription factor induces anthocyanin production in transgenic Taraxacum brevicorniculatum. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Yuan, Y.; Chiu, L.W.; Li, L. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in red cabbage. Planta 2009, 230, 1141–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Ren, Y.; He, Q.; Ma, X.; Zhang, L. Characteristics of Color Development in Seeds of Brown- and Yellow-Seeded Heading Chinese Cabbage and Molecular Analysis of Brsc, the Candidate Gene Controlling Seed Coat Color. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Li, X.; Chen, L.; Hong, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zu, F.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; Tu, J.; et al. A large insertion in bHLH transcription factor BrTT8 resulting in yellow seed coat in Brassica rapa. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Rahim, M.A.; Busatto, N.; Trainotti, L. Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in peach fruits. Planta 2014, 240, 913–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Ravaglia, D.; Espley, R.V.; Henry-Kirk, R.A.; Andreotti, C.; Ziosi, V.; Hellens, R.P.; Costa, G.; Allan, A.C. Transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in nectarine (Prunus persica) by a set of R2R3 MYB transcription factors. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Taheri, A.; Jayasankar, S.; Cline, J.A.; Raizada, M.N.; Pauls, P.K. A WD-repeat gene from peach (Prunus persica L.) is a functional ortholog of Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 48, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Espley, R.V.; Hellens, R.P.; Putterill, J.; Stevenson, D.E.; Kutty-Amma, S.; Allan, A.C. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 2007, 49, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Lin-Wang, K.; Bolitho, K.; Grafton, K.; Kortstee, A.; Karunairetnam, S.; McGhie, T.K.; Espley, R.V.; Hellens, R.P.; Allan, A.C. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor associated with regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Rosaceae. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Matousek, J.; Kocabek, T.; Patzak, J.; Fussy, Z.; Prochazkova, J.; Heyerick, A. Combinatorial analysis of lupulin gland transcription factors from R2R3Myb, bHLH and WDR families indicates a complex regulation of chs_H1 genes essential for prenylflavonoid biosynthesis in hop (Humulus Lupulus L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Yoshida, K.; Kume, N.; Nakaya, Y.; Yamagami, A.; Nakano, T.; Sakuta, M. Comparative analysis of the triplicate proathocyanidin regulators in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 912–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Karas, B.; Amyot, L.; Johansen, C.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Kawaguchi, M.; Szczyglowski, K. Conservation of lotus and Arabidopsis basic helix-loop-helix proteins reveals new players in root hair development. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Li, P.; Chen, B.; Zhang, G.; Chen, L.; Dong, Q.; Wen, J.; Mysore, K.S.; Zhao, J. Regulation of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis by Medicago truncatula bHLH transcription factor MtTT8. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 905–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Peel, G.J.; Pang, Y.; Modolo, L.V.; Dixon, R.A. The LAP1 MYB transcription factor orchestrates anthocyanidin biosynthesis and glycosylation in Medicago. Plant J. 2009, 59, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Hancock, K.R.; Collette, V.; Fraser, K.; Greig, M.; Xue, H.; Richardson, K.; Jones, C.; Rasmussen, S. Expression of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor TaMYB14 from Trifolium arvense activates proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in the legumes Trifolium repens and Medicago sativa. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1204–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Verdier, J.; Zhao, J.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Ge, S.; Liu, C.; He, X.; Mysore, K.S.; Dixon, R.A.; Udvardi, M.K. MtPAR MYB transcription factor acts as an on switch for proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1766–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Jun, J.H.; Liu, C.; Xiao, X.; Dixon, R.A. The Transcriptional Repressor MYB2 Regulates Both Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Proanthocyandin and Anthocyanin Pigmentation in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2860–2879. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  213. Wang, L.; Ran, L.; Hou, Y.; Tian, Q.; Li, C.; Liu, R.; Fan, D.; Luo, K. The transcription factor MYB115 contributes to the regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and enhances fungal resistance in poplar. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Mellway, R.D.; Tran, L.T.; Prouse, M.B.; Campbell, M.M.; Constabel, C.P. The Wound-, Pathogen-, and Ultraviolet B-Responsive MYB134 Gene Encodes an R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates Proanthocyanidin Synthesis in Poplar. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 924–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Yoshida, K.; Ma, D.; Constabel, C.P. The MYB182 protein down-regulates proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin biosynthesis in poplar by repressing both structural and regulatory flavonoid genes. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 693–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Czemmel, S.; Stracke, R.; Weisshaar, B.; Cordon, N.; Harris, N.N.; Walker, A.R.; Robinson, S.P.; Bogs, J. The grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor VvMYBF1 regulates flavonol synthesis in developing grape berries. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1513–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Hichri, I.; Heppel, S.C.; Pillet, J.; Leon, C.; Czemmel, S.; Delrot, S.; Lauvergeat, V.; Bogs, J. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MYC1 is involved in the regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in grapevine. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Bogs, J.; Jaffe, F.W.; Takos, A.M.; Walker, A.R.; Robinson, S.P. The grapevine transcription factor VvMYBPA1 regulates proanthocyanidin synthesis during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1347–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Matus, J.T.; Poupin, M.J.; Canon, P.; Bordeu, E.; Alcalde, J.A.; Arce-Johnson, P. Isolation of WDR and bHLH genes related to flavonoid synthesis in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 72, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Kobayashi, S.; Goto-Yamamoto, N.; Hirochika, H. Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science 2004, 304, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Xue, B.; Charest, P.J.; Devantier, Y.; Rutledge, R.G. Characterization of a MYBR2R3 gene from black spruce (Picea mariana) that shares functional conservation with maize C1. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2003, 270, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Bedon, F.; Bomal, C.; Caron, S.; Levasseur, C.; Boyle, B.; Mansfield, S.D.; Schmidt, A.; Gershenzon, J.; Grima-Pettenati, J.; Seguin, A.; et al. Subgroup 4 R2R3-MYBs in conifer trees: Gene family expansion and contribution to the isoprenoid- and flavonoid-oriented responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3847–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Bomal, C.; Bedon, F.; Caron, S.; Mansfield, S.D.; Levasseur, C.; Cooke, J.E.; Blais, S.; Tremblay, L.; Morency, M.J.; Pavy, N.; et al. Involvement of Pinus taeda MYB1 and MYB8 in phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biogenesis: A comparative in planta analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3925–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Menand, B.; Yi, K.; Jouannic, S.; Hoffmann, L.; Ryan, E.; Linstead, P.; Schaefer, D.G.; Dolan, L. An ancient mechanism controls the development of cells with a rooting function in land plants. Science 2007, 316, 1477–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Zoratti, L.; Karppinen, K.; Luengo Escobar, A.; Haggman, H.; Jaakola, L. Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Jaakola, L. New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flavonoid biosynthesis pathway of plants modified from [22] with an emphasis on A. thaliana seeds. Black arrows highlight the core pathway and substances in A. thaliana discussed in this review. The respective enzymatic steps from the different levels of the pathway are extracted on the right. Examples for different products of OMTs (O-METHYLTRANSFERASEs) are given (isorhamnetin, peonidin, petunidin, malvidin). Note that not all steps occur in A. thaliana and other substances can also occur in A. thaliana: e.g., pelargonidin. See [22] for details. The dashed arrow indicates that several proteins and enzymes are required for proanthocyanidin synthesis, deposition and/or further conversion to condensed tannins including transport processes (for a review on flavonoid transport and a few recent findings, see [24,25]). R2R3-MYELOBLASTOSIS-basic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX-WD40 repeat (MBW(AtTTG1)) complexes predominantly regulate late biosynthetic genes encoding for the core pathway enzymes. Dashed line: the assumed “border” between early and late biosynthetic genes and products in A. thaliana [20,26,27]. Boxed enzymes are under differential developmental regulation of MBW(AtTTG1) complexes. See Section 6 for details. Reduced levels of isorhamnetin in seeds of ttg1-1, but not transparent testa (tt)2 and tt8 mutants, indicate that the border might need some adjustment or that additional AtTTG1-dependent regulation occurs [22]. CHS: CHALCONE SYNTHASE, CHI: CHALCONE ISOMERASE, F3H: FLAVANONE 3-HYDROXYLASE, F3′H: FLAVONOID 3′ HYDROXYLASE, FLS: FLAVONOL SYNTHASE, DFR: DIHYDROFLAVONOL 4-REDUCTASE, LDOX: LEUCOANTHOCYANIDIN DIOXYGENASE, ANS: ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE, ANR: ANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE, BAN: BANYLUS, EBG: early biosynthetic genes, LBG: late biosynthetic genes.
Figure 1. Flavonoid biosynthesis pathway of plants modified from [22] with an emphasis on A. thaliana seeds. Black arrows highlight the core pathway and substances in A. thaliana discussed in this review. The respective enzymatic steps from the different levels of the pathway are extracted on the right. Examples for different products of OMTs (O-METHYLTRANSFERASEs) are given (isorhamnetin, peonidin, petunidin, malvidin). Note that not all steps occur in A. thaliana and other substances can also occur in A. thaliana: e.g., pelargonidin. See [22] for details. The dashed arrow indicates that several proteins and enzymes are required for proanthocyanidin synthesis, deposition and/or further conversion to condensed tannins including transport processes (for a review on flavonoid transport and a few recent findings, see [24,25]). R2R3-MYELOBLASTOSIS-basic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX-WD40 repeat (MBW(AtTTG1)) complexes predominantly regulate late biosynthetic genes encoding for the core pathway enzymes. Dashed line: the assumed “border” between early and late biosynthetic genes and products in A. thaliana [20,26,27]. Boxed enzymes are under differential developmental regulation of MBW(AtTTG1) complexes. See Section 6 for details. Reduced levels of isorhamnetin in seeds of ttg1-1, but not transparent testa (tt)2 and tt8 mutants, indicate that the border might need some adjustment or that additional AtTTG1-dependent regulation occurs [22]. CHS: CHALCONE SYNTHASE, CHI: CHALCONE ISOMERASE, F3H: FLAVANONE 3-HYDROXYLASE, F3′H: FLAVONOID 3′ HYDROXYLASE, FLS: FLAVONOL SYNTHASE, DFR: DIHYDROFLAVONOL 4-REDUCTASE, LDOX: LEUCOANTHOCYANIDIN DIOXYGENASE, ANS: ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE, ANR: ANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE, BAN: BANYLUS, EBG: early biosynthetic genes, LBG: late biosynthetic genes.
Plants 06 00065 g001
Figure 2. AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network. Proteins encoded by the AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network and possible differential MBW(AtTTG1) complex formation, regulating the five major AtTTG1-dependent traits. Shown are all bHLH and R2R3-MYB proteins that can form a ternary complex with AtTTG1 and regulate one of the five major AtTTG1-dependent traits indicated on the right. Lines represent interactions as documented in the BioGrid database (www.thebiogrid.org) [39]. Inhibitors/competitors compete with respective R2R3-MYBs for binding to bHLH proteins. We also extracted from the BioGrid database non-MYB and non-bHLH factors that interact with TTG1 and added the recently found interactors SPL4 and SPL5. Interactions are documented in a variety of papers [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. For the inhibitors, see e.g., [54,55,56]. The seed coat picture was acquired by Hans-Peter Bollhagen. Photography of the seedling was done by Siegfried Werth. TTG1: TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1, GL3: GLABRA3, EGL3: ENHANCER OF GLABRA3, MYC: MYELOCYTOMATOSIS (homolog), TT: TRANSPARENT TESTA, WER: WERWOLF, MYB: MYELOBLASTOSIS (homolog), PAP: PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT, TRY: TRIPTYCHON, CPC: CAPRICE, ETC: ENHANCER OF TRY AND CPC1, TCL: TRICHOMELESS, MYBL: MYB-like, TTG2: TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1, SPL: SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE, BIN2: BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2, GEM: GL2-EXPRESSION MODULATOR. PAP3 and PAP4 are also known as MYB113 and MYB114, respectively [57].
Figure 2. AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network. Proteins encoded by the AtTTG1-dependent gene regulatory network and possible differential MBW(AtTTG1) complex formation, regulating the five major AtTTG1-dependent traits. Shown are all bHLH and R2R3-MYB proteins that can form a ternary complex with AtTTG1 and regulate one of the five major AtTTG1-dependent traits indicated on the right. Lines represent interactions as documented in the BioGrid database (www.thebiogrid.org) [39]. Inhibitors/competitors compete with respective R2R3-MYBs for binding to bHLH proteins. We also extracted from the BioGrid database non-MYB and non-bHLH factors that interact with TTG1 and added the recently found interactors SPL4 and SPL5. Interactions are documented in a variety of papers [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. For the inhibitors, see e.g., [54,55,56]. The seed coat picture was acquired by Hans-Peter Bollhagen. Photography of the seedling was done by Siegfried Werth. TTG1: TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1, GL3: GLABRA3, EGL3: ENHANCER OF GLABRA3, MYC: MYELOCYTOMATOSIS (homolog), TT: TRANSPARENT TESTA, WER: WERWOLF, MYB: MYELOBLASTOSIS (homolog), PAP: PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT, TRY: TRIPTYCHON, CPC: CAPRICE, ETC: ENHANCER OF TRY AND CPC1, TCL: TRICHOMELESS, MYBL: MYB-like, TTG2: TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1, SPL: SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE, BIN2: BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2, GEM: GL2-EXPRESSION MODULATOR. PAP3 and PAP4 are also known as MYB113 and MYB114, respectively [57].
Plants 06 00065 g002
Figure 3. (a) AtTTG1 gene structure, mutants and protein domains. The AtTTG1 gene structure was retrieved from TAIR [105]. Exons, introns, 5′ and 3′UTR, mutants and protein domains were visualized using CLC DNA workbench 5.3.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Please note that the intron is not part of the 3′UTR, which comprises the last nucleotide of exon 1 and the full exon 2. When searching databases for domains and repeats of AtTTG1, the resulting number, positioning and confidence for the detected WD40 repeats are diverse (e.g., SMART, PROSITE) [106,107,108,109]. Shown here is the annotation provided by UniProt. The colored bar below the protein sequence indicates the confidence of the Phyr2 model shown in (b) along the protein [110]. (b,c) AtTTG1 tertiary structure. The AtTTG1 protein tertiary structure was modeled using (b) Phyre2 or (c) loaded into SwissProt PdbViewer v.4.1.0 for marking the amino acids that are mutated or changed to a stop codon in the mutants [110,111]. Both (b,c) underline a part of the β-sheet structure, in particular the relevance of the C-terminus of AtTTG1 for the tertiary structure (highlighted by an ellipse in (b)). For the list of mutants and respective references, please refer to Table 1. CDS: coding DNA sequence, UTR: untranslated region.
Figure 3. (a) AtTTG1 gene structure, mutants and protein domains. The AtTTG1 gene structure was retrieved from TAIR [105]. Exons, introns, 5′ and 3′UTR, mutants and protein domains were visualized using CLC DNA workbench 5.3.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Please note that the intron is not part of the 3′UTR, which comprises the last nucleotide of exon 1 and the full exon 2. When searching databases for domains and repeats of AtTTG1, the resulting number, positioning and confidence for the detected WD40 repeats are diverse (e.g., SMART, PROSITE) [106,107,108,109]. Shown here is the annotation provided by UniProt. The colored bar below the protein sequence indicates the confidence of the Phyr2 model shown in (b) along the protein [110]. (b,c) AtTTG1 tertiary structure. The AtTTG1 protein tertiary structure was modeled using (b) Phyre2 or (c) loaded into SwissProt PdbViewer v.4.1.0 for marking the amino acids that are mutated or changed to a stop codon in the mutants [110,111]. Both (b,c) underline a part of the β-sheet structure, in particular the relevance of the C-terminus of AtTTG1 for the tertiary structure (highlighted by an ellipse in (b)). For the list of mutants and respective references, please refer to Table 1. CDS: coding DNA sequence, UTR: untranslated region.
Plants 06 00065 g003
Figure 4. Tissue-specific MBW(AtTTG1) regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis’ LBGs. Collection of exemplifying studies analyzing the flavonoids core enzyme’s regulation through MBW(AtTTG1) components. These comprise tissue-specific, mutant and promoter-reporter experimental approaches. Black boxes next to the MBW factors indicate the combinations of MBW factors, used mutants or overexpression lines in the respective experiment summarized above for the different LBG promoters. Black boxes next to the enzymes depend on the type of experiment. The respective enzyme’s promoter was either (1) upregulated by combinations of MBW factors or in MBW overexpression lines; (2) downregulated in the respective mutant; (3) induced upon DEX treatment combined with or without CHX when fusions with GR were used. White boxes: the respective promoter/transcript level was not significantly affected in the experiment, and this was documented in the respective study. Grey boxes: not tested/no results presented in the respective study. Note the differential regulation based on complex composition, e.g., for AtTTG1-GL3/EGL3/TT8-TT2/MYB5 complexes in [115]. AtTTG1-GL3/EGL3/TT8-PAP are known to be relevant in vegetative tissue (e.g., [115,118]). The following studies were used for compiling this figure and are indicated in the figure as numbers below the MBW factors: 1: [42], 2: [47], 3: [115], 4: [27], 5: [116], 6: [46], 7: [118], 8: [117]. *: wt vs. mutant or overexpressor (ttg1, tt2, myb5, gl3egl3, gl3egl3tt8, gl3egl3tt8myc1, MYBRNAi, pap1/pap1-D, Pro35S:MYB113). Black boxes mean in this case: The respective promoters are significantly downregulated in the respective mutants. #: upregulation effect of transcription upon overexpression of TTG1-GR or GL3-GR encoding constructs in ttg1 or in the gl3egl3 double mutant. ##: effect is also seen for GL3-GR when EGL3 is present in gl3 single mutants (height sucrose concentration (3%) in this experiment); F3H and CHX were not tested in this experiment. x: fusion to GR in the presence of DEX and CHX leads to upregulation of the respective promoter tested (all in respective mutant background). Pp: Physcomitrella patens protoplasts At: A. thaliana (A7) protoplasts, siliques: young siliques, endoth.: endothelium, seedling +: seedlings treated with cycloheximide (CHX) when testing for the effect of overexpressing, e.g., AtTTG1-GR (glucocorticoid receptor) or GL3-GR, respectively. For chalaza and endothelium, the results are from the visual impression from GUS-stained seeds. Thick boxes around enzymes: LBGs. See, e.g., Figure 1 for the other abbreviations.
Figure 4. Tissue-specific MBW(AtTTG1) regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis’ LBGs. Collection of exemplifying studies analyzing the flavonoids core enzyme’s regulation through MBW(AtTTG1) components. These comprise tissue-specific, mutant and promoter-reporter experimental approaches. Black boxes next to the MBW factors indicate the combinations of MBW factors, used mutants or overexpression lines in the respective experiment summarized above for the different LBG promoters. Black boxes next to the enzymes depend on the type of experiment. The respective enzyme’s promoter was either (1) upregulated by combinations of MBW factors or in MBW overexpression lines; (2) downregulated in the respective mutant; (3) induced upon DEX treatment combined with or without CHX when fusions with GR were used. White boxes: the respective promoter/transcript level was not significantly affected in the experiment, and this was documented in the respective study. Grey boxes: not tested/no results presented in the respective study. Note the differential regulation based on complex composition, e.g., for AtTTG1-GL3/EGL3/TT8-TT2/MYB5 complexes in [115]. AtTTG1-GL3/EGL3/TT8-PAP are known to be relevant in vegetative tissue (e.g., [115,118]). The following studies were used for compiling this figure and are indicated in the figure as numbers below the MBW factors: 1: [42], 2: [47], 3: [115], 4: [27], 5: [116], 6: [46], 7: [118], 8: [117]. *: wt vs. mutant or overexpressor (ttg1, tt2, myb5, gl3egl3, gl3egl3tt8, gl3egl3tt8myc1, MYBRNAi, pap1/pap1-D, Pro35S:MYB113). Black boxes mean in this case: The respective promoters are significantly downregulated in the respective mutants. #: upregulation effect of transcription upon overexpression of TTG1-GR or GL3-GR encoding constructs in ttg1 or in the gl3egl3 double mutant. ##: effect is also seen for GL3-GR when EGL3 is present in gl3 single mutants (height sucrose concentration (3%) in this experiment); F3H and CHX were not tested in this experiment. x: fusion to GR in the presence of DEX and CHX leads to upregulation of the respective promoter tested (all in respective mutant background). Pp: Physcomitrella patens protoplasts At: A. thaliana (A7) protoplasts, siliques: young siliques, endoth.: endothelium, seedling +: seedlings treated with cycloheximide (CHX) when testing for the effect of overexpressing, e.g., AtTTG1-GR (glucocorticoid receptor) or GL3-GR, respectively. For chalaza and endothelium, the results are from the visual impression from GUS-stained seeds. Thick boxes around enzymes: LBGs. See, e.g., Figure 1 for the other abbreviations.
Plants 06 00065 g004
Figure 5. One speculative scenario illustrating the diverse missing links between MBW(AtTTG1) regulatory mechanisms. See the text for the details.
Figure 5. One speculative scenario illustrating the diverse missing links between MBW(AtTTG1) regulatory mechanisms. See the text for the details.
Plants 06 00065 g005
Figure 6. MBW proteins are common and conserved modules involved in regulating flavonoid biosynthesis throughout the plant kingdom. The phylogeny of selected land plants is reflected by time tree topology on the left (TimeTree (left) generated using the TimeTree database (www.timetree.org) [159]). Functionally-characterized MBW proteins from different plant species are listed in the middle (flavonoid pathway exclusive). Question marks indicate unidentified components. For a full list of proteins and references, please refer to Table 2.
Figure 6. MBW proteins are common and conserved modules involved in regulating flavonoid biosynthesis throughout the plant kingdom. The phylogeny of selected land plants is reflected by time tree topology on the left (TimeTree (left) generated using the TimeTree database (www.timetree.org) [159]). Functionally-characterized MBW proteins from different plant species are listed in the middle (flavonoid pathway exclusive). Question marks indicate unidentified components. For a full list of proteins and references, please refer to Table 2.
Plants 06 00065 g006
Table 1. Comprehensive list of A. thaliana ttg1 mutants with documentation on seed pigmentation.
Table 1. Comprehensive list of A. thaliana ttg1 mutants with documentation on seed pigmentation.
AlleleBackgroundMutagenesisMutationPhenotypeReferences
ttg1-1LerEMSQ317stoptt, g[15,34]
ttg1-9Col-0EMSS282Ftt, g[34,95,96]
ttg1-10WsEMSg->a (5′UTR)tt, (g)[97]
ttg1-11Col-0EMSG149Rtt, g[97]
ttg1-12Col-0EMSG43Rtt, g[97]
ttg1-13RLD1fast neutronsdeletiontt, g[97]
ttg1-15Antwerp-1Kranz collect.S310stoptt, g[34] *
ttg1-16Enkheim-1Kranz collect.S310stoptt, g[34] 1
ttg1-17Enkheim-1Kranz collect.S310stoptt, g[34] 1
ttg1-18Enkheim-1Kranz collect.S310stoptt, g[34] 1
ttg1-19Enkheim-1Kranz collect.W183stoptt, g[34] 1
ttg1-20Enkheim-1Kranz collect.S30C, S310stoptt, g[34] 1
ttg1-21Col-0T-DNA 2exon 1tt, NA[11,98]
ttg1-21-CI *Colcarbon ion irradiationexon 1 (CI)tt, NA[99]
ttg1-22Col-0T-DNA 2exon 1tt, NA[11,98]
ttg1-213NANAW183stoptt, g[100]
urm23gl1-2 (Col-1)EMSG302E((g))[100]
ttg1 (Est)Est-1EMSS101Ftt, g[101]
ttg1-P313Col-4T-DNA 3insertion (ND)g[102,103]
ttg1-P416Col-4T-DNA 3insertion (Chr5: 8371365..8371665)tt, g[102,103]
ttg1-SK31268Col-4T-DNA 3insertion (ND)tt, g[102,103]
ttg1-SK41546Col-4T-DNA 3insertion (Chr5: 8371188..8371488)tt, g #[102,103]
* Note that ttg1-21 has been assigned twice and “-CI” was added here for clarification, CI = carbon ion-induced chromosomal rearrangement (breakage in exon 1 of TTG1 on chromosome 5 and rejoining with chromosome 3), tt: transparent testa phenotype, g: glabra phenotype, severity of glabrous phenotype: g > (g) > ((g)); 1 origin: Kranz collect. = Kranz collection; 2 GABI (“Genomanalyse im biologischen System Pflanze”) -Kat (“Kölner Arabidopsis T-DNA”) lines [98]; 3 SK (Saskatoon) population [103]: activation tagging lines (insertion of pSKI015 [104]); # enlarged trichome cells usually with no aerial extension, but sometimes stubby un-branched trichomes. Please note that not in all cases has the function been linked to the mutation. Not all studies conducted a rescue experiment or tested for allelism with a previously established mutant. Please refer to the references for more details. Col: Columbia, Ler: Landsberg erecta, Est: Estland, EMS: Ethyl methanesulfonate (used for mutagenesis), T-DNA: transfer-DNA, UTR: untranslated region, NA: no information available, urm: unarmed, gl1: glabra1, ND: position of insertion was not determined in the respective study.
Table 2. MBW (R2R3-MYB-bHLH-WDR) proteins (putatively) regulating flavonoid biosynthesis from different plant species.
Table 2. MBW (R2R3-MYB-bHLH-WDR) proteins (putatively) regulating flavonoid biosynthesis from different plant species.
SpeciesMBW ProteinsReferences
WDRbHLHR2R3-MYB
Zea maysZmPAC1ZmR/B
ZmIN1 (repressor)
ZmC1; ZmPL
ZmP1 (independence of WDR and bHLH)
[58,82,83,138,144,145,179,180,181]
Setaria italicaSiTTG1 [156]
Oryza sativa OsRa/Rb/Rc
OsB2
OsRc-bHLH
OsC1; OsRc-MYB1/2[29,182,183,184]
Freesia hybrida FhTT8L
FhGL3L
[185]
Antirrhinum majus AmDEL
AmMUT
AmROS1/2; AmVE
AmMYB308/330 (repressors)
[147,186,187,188]
Perilla frutescensPfWD (cytosol)PfMYC [151]
Petunia hybridaPhAN11 (cytosol)PhAN1
PhJAF13
PhAN2/4; PhPH4
PhMYB27 (repressor)
[139,140,141,142,143,147,149,175]
Nicotiana tabacum NtAN1a/bNtAN2[189]
Ipomoea nilInWDR1
InWDR2 *
InbHLH2
InbHLH1/3 *
InMYB1
InMYB2/3 *
[152]
Arabidopsis thalianaAtTTG1AtTT8
AtGL3
AtEGL3
AtMYC1 *
AtPAP1/2; AtMYB113/114; AtTT2; AtMYB5
AtMYB4 (repressor)
[15,27,34,42,46,47,165,190,191,192,193,194,195,196]
Arabis alpinaAaTTG1 [155]
Brassica oleraceaBoTTG1BoTT8
BoEGL3 *
BoMYB2
BoMYB12 * BoTT2 *
[197]
Brassica rapaBrTTG1BrTT8 [198,199]
Gossypium hirsutumGhTTG1/3GhDEL61/65 *
GhMYC1 *
GhRLC1[166,167,168,169]
Prunus persicaPpWD40PpbHLH3PpMYB10.1/10.3; PpMYBPA1; PpMYB16
PpMYB111 (a repressor)
[200,201,202]
Malus domesticaMdTTG1MdbHLH3
MdbHLH33
MdGL3
MdMYB1/9/10/11; MdMYBA[153,203,204]
Humulus lupulusHlWDR1HlbHLH2HlMYB2/3
HlMYB7 (a repressor)
[205]
Lotus japonicusLjTTG1LjTT8, LjEGL3
LjRHL1 *
LjTAN1; LjTT2a/b/c[206,207]
Medicago truncatulaMtWD40-1MtTT8
MtEGL3 *
MtLAP1; MtPAR; MtMYB5/14
MtMYB2 (a repressor)
[154,208,209,210,211,212]
Populus trichocarpaPtrTTG1PtrTT8PtrMYB134/115/116/117/118/119;
PtrMYB182 (a repressor)
[213,214,215]
Vitis viniferaVvWDR1/2VvMYCA1
VvMYC1
VvMYBPA1; VvMYBF1; VvMYBA1[216,217,218,219,220]
Picea abiesPaWD40-1PabHLH1/2
PabHLH3 *
PaMYB29/32/33/35
PaMYB30/31/34 *
[94]
Picea mariana PmMBF1[221]
Pinus taeda PtMYB1/4/8/14[222,223]
Physcomitrella patens PpRSL1/2 *(rhizoid development) [29,224]
* Functions in flavonoid biosynthesis regulation remain to be confirmed. Note, not for all proteins have full MBW complexes been described (so far). Some might turn out not to be present in these species as MBW complexes.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B.; Schrader, A. TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1-Dependent Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis. Plants 2017, 6, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6040065

AMA Style

Zhang B, Schrader A. TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1-Dependent Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis. Plants. 2017; 6(4):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6040065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Bipei, and Andrea Schrader. 2017. "TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1-Dependent Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis" Plants 6, no. 4: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6040065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop