Next Article in Journal
On Some Extended Block Krylov Based Methods for Large Scale Nonsymmetric Stein Matrix Equations
Next Article in Special Issue
On Optimal Fuzzy Best Proximity Coincidence Points of Proximal Contractions Involving Cyclic Mappings in Non-Archimedean Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
F-Harmonic Maps between Doubly Warped Product Manifolds
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Approach to Study Fixed Point of Multivalued Mappings in Modular Metric Spaces and Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Generalization of b-Metric Space and Some Fixed Point Theorems

1
Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2017, 5(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019
Submission received: 17 November 2016 / Revised: 20 March 2017 / Accepted: 20 March 2017 / Published: 23 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fixed Point Theorems and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, inspired by the concept of b-metric space, we introduce the concept of extended b-metric space. We also establish some fixed point theorems for self-mappings defined on such spaces. Our results extend/generalize many pre-existing results in literature.

1. Introduction

The idea of b-metric was initiated from the works of Bourbaki [1] and Bakhtin [2]. Czerwik [3] gave an axiom which was weaker than the triangular inequality and formally defined a b-metric space with a view of generalizing the Banach contraction mapping theorem. Later on, Fagin et al. [4] discussed some kind of relaxation in triangular inequality and called this new distance measure as non-linear elastic mathing (NEM). Similar type of relaxed triangle inequality was also used for trade measure [5] and to measure ice floes [6]. All these applications intrigued and pushed us to introduce the concept of extended b-metric space. So that the results obtained for such rich spaces become more viable in different directions of applications.
Definition 1.
Let X be a non empty set and s 1 be a given real number. A function d : X × X [ 0 , ) is called b-metric (Bakhtin [2], Czrerwik [3]) if it satisfies the following properties for each x , y , z X .
(b1): 
d ( x , y ) = 0 x = y ;
(b2): 
d ( x , y ) = d ( y , x ) ;
(b3): 
d ( x , z ) s [ d ( x , y ) + d ( y , z ) ] .
The pair ( X , d ) is called a b-metric space.
Example 1.
1. Let X : = l p ( R ) with 0 < p < 1 where l p ( R ) : = { { x n } R : n = 1 | x n | p < } . Define d : X × X R + as:
d ( x , y ) = ( n = 1 | x n y n | p ) 1 / p
where x = { x n } , y = { y n } . Then d is a b-metric space [7,8,9] with coefficient s = 2 1 / p .
2. Let X : = L p [ 0 , 1 ] be the space of all real functions x ( t ) , t [ 0 , 1 ] such that 0 1 | x ( t ) | p < with 0 < p < 1 . Define d : X × X R + as:
d ( x , y ) = 0 1 | x ( t ) y ( t ) | p d t 1 / p
Then d is b-metric space [7,8,9] with coefficient s = 2 1 / p .
The above examples show that the class of b-metric spaces is larger than the class of metric spaces. When s = 1 , the concept of b-metric space coincides with the concept of metric space. For some details on subject see [7,8,9,10,11,12].
Definition 2.
Let ( X , d ) be a b-metric space. A sequence { x n } in X is said to be:
(I) 
Cauchy [12] if and only if d ( x n , x m ) 0 as n , m ;
(II) 
Convergent [12] if and only if there exist x X such that d ( x n , x ) 0 as n and we write lim n x n = x ;
(III) 
The b-metric space ( X , d ) is complete [12] if every Cauchy sequence is convergent.
In the following we recollect the extension of Banach contraction principle in case of b-metric spaces.
Theorem 1.
Let ( X , d ) be a complete b-metric space with constant s 1 , such that b-metric is a continuous functional. Let T : X X be a contraction having contraction constant k [ 0 , 1 ) such that k s < 1 . Then T has a unique fixed point [13].

2. Results

In this section, we introduce a new type of generalized metric space, which we call as an extended b-metric space. We also establish some fixed point theorems arising from this metric space.
Definition 3.
Let X be a non empty set and θ : X × X [ 1 , ) . A function d θ : X × X [ 0 , ) is called an extended b-metric if for all x , y , z X it satisfies:
  • ( d θ 1 ) d θ ( x , y ) = 0 iff x = y ;
  • ( d θ 2 ) d θ ( x , y ) = d θ ( y , x ) ;
  • ( d θ 3 ) d θ ( x , z ) θ ( x , z ) [ d θ ( x , y ) + d θ ( y , z ) ] .
The pair ( X , d θ ) is called an extended b-metric space.
Remark 1.
If θ ( x , y ) = s for s 1 then we obtain the definition of a b-metric space.
Example 2.
Let X = { 1 , 2 , 3 } . Define θ : X × X R + and d θ : X × X R + as:
θ ( x , y ) = 1 + x + y
d θ ( 1 , 1 ) = d θ ( 2 , 2 ) = d θ ( 3 , 3 ) = 0
d θ ( 1 , 2 ) = d θ ( 2 , 1 ) = 80 , d θ ( 1 , 3 ) = d θ ( 3 , 1 ) = 1000 , d θ ( 2 , 3 ) = d θ ( 3 , 2 ) = 600
Proof. 
( d θ 1 ) and ( d θ 2 ) trivially hold. For ( d θ 3 ) we have:
d θ ( 1 , 2 ) = 80 , θ ( 1 , 2 ) d θ ( 1 , 3 ) + d θ ( 3 , 2 ) = 4 ( 1000 + 600 ) = 6400
d θ ( 1 , 3 ) = 1000 , θ ( 1 , 3 ) d θ ( 1 , 2 ) + d θ ( 2 , 3 ) = 5 ( 80 + 600 ) = 3400
Similar calculations hold for d θ ( 2 , 3 ) . Hence for all x , y , z X
d θ ( x , z ) θ ( x , z ) [ d θ ( x , y ) + d θ ( y , z ) ]
Hence ( X , d θ ) is an extended b-metric space. ☐
Example 3.
Let X = C ( [ a , b ] , R ) be the space of all continuous real valued functions define on [ a , b ] . Note that X is complete extended b-metric space by considering d θ ( x , y ) = sup t [ a , b ] | x ( t ) y ( t ) | 2 , with θ ( x , y ) = | x ( t ) | + | y ( t ) | + 2 , where θ : X × X [ 1 , ) .
The concepts of convergence, Cauchy sequence and completeness can easily be extended to the case of an extended b-metric space.
Definition 4.
Let ( X , d θ ) be an extended b-metric space.
(i) 
A sequence { x n } in X is said to converge to x X , if for every ϵ > 0 there exists N = N ( ϵ ) N such that d θ ( x n , x ) < ϵ , for all n N . In this case, we write lim n x n = x .
(ii) 
A sequence { x n } in X is said to be Cauchy, if for every ϵ > 0 there exists N = N ( ϵ ) N such that d θ ( x m , x n ) < ϵ , for all m , n N .
Definition 5.
An extended b-metric space ( X , d θ ) is complete if every Cauchy sequence in X is convergent.
Note that, in general a b-metric is not a continuous functional and thus so is an extended b-metric.
Example 4.
Let X = N and let d : X × X R be defined by [14]:
d ( x , y ) = 0 i f m = n | 1 m 1 n | i f m , n a r e e v e n o r m n = 5 i f m , n a r e o d d a n d m n 2 o t h e r w i s e
Then ( X , d ) is a b-metric with s = 3 but it is not continuous.
Lemma 1.
Let ( X , d θ ) be an extended b-metric space. If d θ is continuous, then every convergent sequence has a unique limit.
Our first theorem is an analogue of Banach contraction principle in the setting of extended b-metric space. Throughout this section, for the mapping T : X X and x 0 X , O ( x 0 ) = { x 0 , T 2 x 0 , T 3 x 0 , } represents the orbit of x 0 .
Theorem 2.
Let ( X , d θ ) be a complete extended b-metric space such that d θ is a continuous functional. Let T : X X satisfy:
d θ ( T x , T y ) k d θ ( x , y ) f o r a l l x , y X
where k [ 0 , 1 ) be such that for each x 0 X , lim n , m θ ( x n , x m ) < 1 k , here x n = T n x 0 , n = 1 , 2 , . Then T has precisely one fixed point ξ. Moreover for each y X , T n y ξ .
Proof. 
We choose any x 0 X be arbitrary, define the iterative sequence { x n } by:
x 0 , T x 0 = x 1 , x 2 = T x 1 = T ( T x 0 ) = T 2 ( x 0 ) , x n = T n x 0 .
Then by successively applying inequality (1) we obtain:
d θ ( x n , x n + 1 ) k n d θ ( x 0 , x 1 )
By triangular inequality and (2), for m > n we have:
d θ ( x n , x m ) θ ( x n , x m ) k n d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) + θ ( x n , x m ) θ ( x n + 1 , x m ) k n + 1 d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) + + θ ( x n , x m ) θ ( x n + 1 , x m ) θ ( x n + 2 , x m ) . . . θ ( x m 2 , x m ) θ ( x m 1 , x m ) k m 1 d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) [ θ ( x 1 , x m ) θ ( x 2 , x m ) θ ( x n 1 , x m ) θ ( x n , x m ) k n + θ ( x 1 , x m ) θ ( x 2 , x m ) θ ( x n , x m ) θ ( x n + 1 , x m ) k n + 1 + + θ ( x 1 , x m ) θ ( x 2 , x m ) θ ( x n , x m ) θ ( x n + 1 , x m ) . . . θ ( x m 2 , x m ) θ ( x m 1 , x m ) k m 1 ]
Since, lim n , m θ ( x n + 1 , x m ) k < 1 so that the series n = 1 k n i = 1 n θ ( x i , x m ) converges by ratio test for each m N . Let:
S = n = 1 k n i = 1 n θ ( x i , x m ) , S n = j = 1 n k j i = 1 j θ ( x i , x m )
Thus for m > n above inequality implies:
d θ ( x n , x m ) d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) S m 1 S n
Letting n we conclude that { x n } is a Cauchy sequence. Since X is complete let x n ξ X :
d θ ( T ξ , ξ ) θ ( T ξ , ξ ) [ d θ ( T ξ , x n ) + d θ ( x n , ξ ) ] θ ( T ξ , ξ ) [ k d θ ( ξ , x n 1 ) + d θ ( x n , ξ ) ] d θ ( T ξ , ξ ) 0 a s n d θ ( T ξ , ξ ) = 0
Hence ξ is a fixed point of T. Moreover uniqueness can easily be invoked by using inequality (1), since k < 1 . ☐
In the following we include another variant which is analogue to fixed point theorem by Hicks and Rhoades [15]. We need the following definition.
Definition 6.
Let T : X X and for some x 0 X , O ( x 0 ) = { x 0 , f x 0 , f 2 x 0 , } be the orbit of x 0 . A function G from X into the set of real numbers is said to be T-orbitally lower semi-continuous at t X if { x n } O ( x 0 ) and x n t implies G ( t ) lim n inf G ( x n ) .
Theorem 3.
Let ( X , d θ ) be a complete extended b-metric space such that d θ is a continuous functional. Let T : X X and there exists x 0 X such that:
d θ ( T y , T 2 y ) k d θ ( y , T y ) f o r e a c h y O ( x 0 )
where k [ 0 , 1 ) be such that for x 0 X , lim n , m θ ( x n , x m ) < 1 k , here x n = T n x 0 , n = 1 , 2 , . Then T n x 0 ξ X ( a s n ) . Furthermore ξ is a fixed point of T if and only if G ( x ) = d ( x , T x ) is T-orbitally lower semi continuous at ξ.
Proof. 
For x 0 X we define the iterative sequence { x n } by:
x 0 , T x 0 = x 1 , x 2 = T x 1 = T ( T x 0 ) = T 2 ( x 0 ) , x n = T n x 0 .
Now for y = T x 0 by successively applying inequality (3) we obtain:
d θ ( T n x 0 , T n + 1 x 0 ) = d θ ( x n , x n + 1 ) k n d θ ( x 0 , x 1 )
Following the same procedure as in the proof of Theorem 2 we conclude that { x n } is a Cauchy sequence. Since X is complete then x n = T n x 0 ξ X . Assume that G is orbitally lower semi continuous at ξ X , then:
d θ ( ξ , T ξ ) lim inf  n d θ ( T n x 0 , T n + 1 x 0 )
lim inf  n k n d θ ( x 0 , x 1 ) = 0
Conversely, let ξ = T ξ and x n O ( x ) with x n ξ . Then:
G ( ξ ) = d ( ξ , T ξ ) = 0 lim inf  n G ( x n ) = d ( T n x 0 , T n + 1 x 0 )
 ☐
Remark 2.
When θ ( x , y ) = 1 a constant function then Theorem 3 reduces to main result of Hicks and Rhoades ([15] (Theorem 1)). Hence Theorem 3 extends/generalizes ([15] (Theorem 1) ).
Example 5.
Let X = [ 0 , ) . Define d θ ( x , y ) : X × X R + and θ : X × X [ 1 , ) as:
d θ ( x , y ) = ( x y ) 2 , θ ( x , y ) = x + y + 2
Then d θ is a complete extended b-metric on X. Define T : X X by T x = x 2 . We have:
d θ ( T x , T y ) = x 2 y 2 2 1 3 ( x y ) 2 = k d θ ( x , y )
Note that for each x X , T n x = x 2 n . Thus we obtain:
lim m , n θ ( T m x , T n x ) = lim m , n x 2 m + x 2 n + 2 < 3
Therefore, all conditions of Theorem 3 are satisfied hence T has a unique fixed point.
Example 6.
Let X = [ 0 , 1 4 ] . Define d θ ( x , y ) : X × X R + and θ : X × X [ 1 , ) as:
d θ ( x , y ) = ( x y ) 2 , θ ( x , y ) = x + y + 2
Then d θ is a complete extended b-metric on X. Define T : X X by T x = x 2 . We have:
d θ ( T x , T y ) 1 4 d θ ( x , y )
Note that for each x X , T n x = x 2 n . Thus we obtain:
lim m , n θ ( T m x , T n x ) < 4
Therefore, all conditions of Theorem 3 are satisfied hence T has a unique fixed point.

3. Application

In this section, we give existence theorem for Fredholm integral equation. Let X = C ( [ a , b ] , R ) be the space of all continuous real valued functions define on [ a , b ] . Note that X is complete extended b-metric space by considering d θ ( x , y ) = sup t [ a , b ] | x ( t ) y ( t ) | 2 , with θ ( x , y ) = | x ( t ) | + | y ( t ) | + 2 , where θ : X × X [ 1 , ) . Consider the Fredholm integral equation as:
x ( t ) = a b M ( t , s , x ( s ) ) d s + g ( t ) , t , s [ a , b ]
where g : [ a , b ] R and M : [ a , b ] × [ a , b ] × R R are continuous functions. Let T : X X the operator given by:
T x ( t ) = a b M ( t , s , x ( s ) ) d s + g ( t ) for t , s [ a , b ]
where, the function g : [ a , b ] R and M : [ a , b ] × [ a , b ] × R R are continuous. Further, assume that the following condition hold:
| M ( t , s , x ( s ) ) M ( t , s , T x ( s ) ) | 1 2 | x ( s ) T x ( s ) | for each t , s [ a , b ] and x X
Then the integral Equation (8) has a solution.
We have to show that the operator T satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3. For any x X we have:
| T x ( t ) T ( T x ( t ) ) | 2 a b | M ( t , s , x ( s ) ) M ( t , s , T x ( s ) ) | d s 2 1 4 d θ ( x , T x )
All conditions of Theorem 3 follows by the hypothesis. Therefore, the operator T has a fixed point, that is, the Fredholm integral Equation (8) has a solution.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the main text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bourbaki, N. Topologie Generale; Herman: Paris, France, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, I.A. The contraction mapping principle in almost metric spaces. Funct. Anal. 1989, 30, 26–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Czerwik, S. Contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. Acta Math. Inform. Univ. Ostra. 1993, 1, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fagin, R.; Stockmeyer, L. Relaxing the triangle inequality in pattern matching. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1998, 30, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cortelazzo, G.; Mian, G.; Vezzi, G.; Zamperoni, P. Trademark shapes description by string matching techniques. Pattern Recognit. 1994, 27, 1005–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McConnell, R.; Kwok, R.; Curlander, J.; Kober, W.; Pang, S. Ψ-S correlation and dynamic time warping: Two methods for tracking ice floes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1991, 29, 1004–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heinonen, J. Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  8. Czerwik, S. Nonlinear set-valued contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. Atti Sem. Mat. Univ. Modena 1998, 46, 263–276. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berinde, V. Generalized contractions in quasimetric spaces. In Seminar on Fixed Point Theory; Babes-Bolyai University: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 1993; pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boriceanu, M.; Bota, M.; Petruşel, A. Multivalued fractals in b-metric spaces. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2010, 8, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samreen, M.; Kamran, T.; Shahzad, N. Some fixed point theorems in b-metric space endowed with graph. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 967132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kadak, U. On the Classical Sets of Sequences with Fuzzy b-metric. Gen. Math. Notes 2014, 23, 2219–7184. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kir, N.; Kiziltun, H. On Some well known fixed point theorems in b-Metric spaces. Turk. J. Anal. Number Theory 2013, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hussain, N.; Doric, D.; Kadelburg, Z.; Radenovic, S. Suzuki-type fixed point results in metric type spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, 2012, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hicks, T.L.; Rhoades, B.E. A Banach type fixed point theorem. Math. Jpn. 1979, 24, 327–330. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamran, T.; Samreen, M.; UL Ain, Q. A Generalization of b-Metric Space and Some Fixed Point Theorems. Mathematics 2017, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019

AMA Style

Kamran T, Samreen M, UL Ain Q. A Generalization of b-Metric Space and Some Fixed Point Theorems. Mathematics. 2017; 5(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamran, Tayyab, Maria Samreen, and Qurat UL Ain. 2017. "A Generalization of b-Metric Space and Some Fixed Point Theorems" Mathematics 5, no. 2: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop