Next Article in Journal
Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Sensing of Lysozyme
Previous Article in Journal
A Double Layer Sensing Electrode “BaTi(1-X)RhxO3/Al-Doped TiO2” for NO2 Detection above 600 °C
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Quality Control Assay to Access the HCl Molarity of Radionuclide Solutions

Collider Accelerator Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
Chemosensors 2016, 4(2), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4020009
Submission received: 14 December 2015 / Revised: 3 April 2016 / Accepted: 3 April 2016 / Published: 4 May 2016

Abstract

:
Strontium-82 is produced by proton activation of a rubidium chloride target in an accelerator or cyclotron and purified by ion exchange chromatography. The Strontrium-82 is used in Cardigen generators to produce Rubidium-82 for cardiac imaging. Quality control testing of the purified Strontium-82 is performed with Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and gamma spectroscopy. To meet Department of Energy specifications for HCl molarity the purified Strontium-82 solution needs to be tested to determine if the isotope is in the 0.05–0.5 M HCl range. This manuscript reports a simple HCl molarity test to determine if the purified Strontium-82 solution meets specifications. Validation of the assay was performed by evaluating all solutions associate with Strontium-82 processing.

1. Introduction

Many radioisotopes manufacturers dissolve radionuclides in dilute HCl to allow easier use in medical applications and environmental applications. One example is Strontium-82 (Sr-82) which is produced in the USA by the isotope production groups at Los Alamos and Brookhaven National Labs [1]. The final Sr-82 is dissolved in 0.1 M HCl [2], shipped to customers that load the isotope on a medical isotope generator, which is marketed as Cardiogen [3,4]. The Sr-82 has a half-life of 25 days and is used in the generator to produced Rubidium-82 which has a half-life of 72 s. The Rubidium-82 mimics potassium in the body, and the isotope is taken up by the heart and used for heart imaging [5]. Many quality control tests are performed on Sr-82 prior to the final product being released for packaging and shipping to customers [6]. In 2013 a technician performing the purification of Sr-82 performed the final dissolution with 4 M hydrochloric acid, the Sr-82 passed all quality control tests involving gamma spectroscopy and ICP-OES analysis. The high hydrochloric acid concentration prevented the customer from loading the Sr-82 solution on a generator for the production of Rubidium-82, and the solution was quarantined in accordance with regulatory policies [7]. One attempt to develop a quick quality control test to determine the HCl molarity of the purified Sr-82 was to dilute the sample with water, determine the pH with pH paper, then calculate the HCl molarity in the original sample. The approach produced varying results and validation of the method was problematic. Checking the HCl molarity using a pH meter can be challenging with 10 μL solutions, as we have found some micro pH probes provide accurate results while others do not reach a stable reading. In this short communication we report a fast quality control test to determine if the HCl molarity of a Sr-82 solution is in the acceptable range. The US Department of Energy specification for HCl molarity of Sr-82 is 0.05–0.5 M HCl, so the test needs to be negative for molarities outside the acceptance range. Titrating the solution to find the exact HCl molarity may take too long and could lead to a higher radiation dose to the technician.

2. Experimental Section

Reagents were purchased from Fisher or Sigma Aldrich. A 1 mg/mL solution of BromoCresol Purple was prepared using 18 MΩ water. For the assay the color of the solution was recorded after each step, and the steps associated with the method are: Step 1) To a 2–5 mL vial or test tube was added 10 μL of the Sr-82 solution, 90 μL of 18 MΩ water and 90 μL of BromoCresol Purple solution. Step 2) Then 49 μL of 0.01 M NaOH, was added. Step 3) Next 465 μL of 0.01 M NaOH was added. The assay was repeated with 10 μL of the following solutions: 0.04, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 1, 4, 6 M HCl, ammonia-ammonium chloride, saturated ammonium chloride and water. Analysis: BromoCresol Purple is yellow below pH 5.2, and the dye is purple above pH 6.8 [8,9,10]. A yellow colored solution after steps 1 and 2 would pass the test, but a purple colored solution would fail the test. For step 3 a purple colored solution would pass the test, and a yellow colored solution would fail the test.

3. Results and Discussion

Quality control testing of Strontium-82 is typically performed in a four hour time window. The ICP-OES, gamma spectroscopy and other testing must be completed prior to evaluation by the quality assurance unit and subsequent packaging. So a rapid assay is needed that uses minimal solution volume. The assay was setup with three steps, and a Strontium-82 product solution should pass all three steps of the assay in order to contain a HCl molarity between 0.05 and 0.5 M HCl. If the Sr-82 solutions fail any of steps of the assay then the sample fails the quality control test. For regulatory compliance a failed batch should be reprocessed according to previously setup reprocessing methods [11]. In step one the Sr-82 solution is tested to determine if it is not in a basic solution, and step two the assay determined if the HCl molarity of the Sr-82 solution is greater than or equal to 0.05 M HCl. In step 3 the assay determines if the Sr-82 solution is equal to or less than 0.5 M HCl. To pass the assay a yellow solution is required after steps 1 and 2, and a purple solution is required after step 3.
Validation of the assay was performed by testing 10 μL of various solutions, and the results are summarized in Table 1 and supplemental information [12]. The following solutions were chosen because they are used during the purification of Sr-82: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 M HCl, ammonia-ammonium chloride, saturated ammonium chloride and water [1,2]. The quality control assay described herein involves the use of a pH indicator to test molarity, and validation of the assay is different than an instrumental method [13]. The range of the assay was evaluated by performing the assay with the following solutions: 0.04, 0.05, 0.5, 0.55 and 0.06 M HCl. The 0.5, 0.55, 0.6 M HCl standards were used to test the upper range of the assay, and the 0.55 and 0.6 M HCl standards failed the assay, but the 0.5 M HCl standard passed the assay. The lower range of the assay was established by performing the analysis on 0.04 and 0.05 M HCl standards. As expected the 0.04 M HCl standard failed the assay, and the 0.05 M HCl standard passed the assay.
Step 1 of the assay failed the ammonia hydroxide-ammonium chloride solution. Step 2 of the assay failed the following solutions: molarities less 0.05 M HCl, water and saturated ammonium chloride. Step 3 failed solutions with molarities greater than 0.5 M HCl. BromoCresol Purple was chosen for the assay. Alternatively, Bromothymol blue, which is yellow below pH 6.0 and blue above pH 7.6, could be used as indicator for the assay. Pipettes used for production samples are routinely checked for accuracy and the pipetting errors range from 1.6 to 1.77%. To calculate propagation of error a pipette error of 1.3% has been used [6,14]. For step 1 the propagation of error was calculated using Equation (1),
error = ( σ ) 2 + ( σ ) 2 + ( σ ) 2
where σ corresponds to the error of pipetting each solvent in step 1. A similar equation was used to determine the error in steps 2 and 3 and the total error for each step was determined: step 1 (2.2%), step 2 (2.6%) and step 3 (2.9%).

4. Conclusions

The assay determines if a Sr-82 solution is in the acceptable HCl molarity range 0.05–0.5 M HCl, and the assay will prevent shipments of Sr-82 solutions in the incorrect matrix. The rapid test can be performed with minimal radiation exposure to the technician and can be adapted for quality control testing of other isotopes. The assay can be used for isotopes that are shipped in HCl solutions such as: Y-88, Sr-82, Ho-166, Pm-149, Tc-95m, As-72, Ge-68, Cu-67, Fe-52, and Mg-28 [15].

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, subprogram Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications core research.

Author Contributions

Jonathan Fitzsimmons developed and validated the HCl molarity test and wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Phillips, D.; Peterson, E.; Taylor, W.; Jamriska, D.; Hamilton, V.; Kitten, J.; Valdez, F.; Salazar, L.; Pitt, L.; Heaton, R.; et al. Production of strontium-82 for the Cardiogen® PET generator: A project of the Department of Energy Virtual Isotope Center. Radiochimica Acta 2000, 88, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fabbender, M.; Nortier, F.M.; Phillips, D.; Hamilton, V.; Heaton, R.; Jamriska, D.; Kitten, J.; Pitt, L.; Salazar, L.; Valdez, F.; et al. Some nuclear chemical aspects of medical generator nuclide production at the Los Alamos hot cell facility. Radiochim. Acta 2004, 92, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alvarez-Diez, T.; deKemp, R.; Beanlands, R.; Vincent, J. Manufacture of strontium-82/rubidium-82 generators and quality control of rubidium-82 chloride for myocardial perfusion imaging in patients using positron emission tomography. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 50, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bracco Diagnostic Inc. Cardiogen-82. Available online: http://imaging.bracco.com/us-en/products-and-solutions/radiopharmaceuticals/cardiogen-82/brochures (accessed on 13 December 2015).
  5. Saha, G.B. Fundamentals of Nuclear Pharmacy, 4th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 293–294. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitzsimmons, J.M.; Medvedev, D.; Mausner, L.M. Specific activity and isotope abundances of strontium in purified strontium-82. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2016, 31, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. FDA Guidance Document: PET Drugs-Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP). August 2011. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM266640.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2015).
  8. Lide, D. (Ed.) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 74th ed.; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 8–18.
  9. Herty, C.; Woodford, L. (Eds.) The Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry; The American Chemical Society: Easton, PA, USA, 1921; Volume 13, p. 103.
  10. Royal Society of Chemistry: Advancing the Chemical Sciences, Welcome to The Royal Society of Chemistry Data Book Website Interactives >indicators BromoCresol purple. Available online: http://www.rsc.org/education/teachers/resources/databook/int_indicators.htm (accessed on 1 April 2016).
  11. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, USP 35, Chapter 823: Positron Emission Tomography Drugs for Compounding, Investigational and Research Uses. http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/key-issues/usp35-nf30_general_chapter_823.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2016).
  12. Fitzsimmons, J. Supplemental data.
  13. FDA: Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/ucm070107.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2015).
  14. Fitzsimmons, J.M.; Mausner, L.M. Determination of the Specific Activity and Isotope Abundances of Accelerator produced Germanium-68. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 305, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. National Isotope Development Center. Available online: https://www.isotopes.gov/catalog/table.php (accessed on 1 April 2016).
Table 1. Evaluation of the quality control assay for Sr-82 solutions.
Table 1. Evaluation of the quality control assay for Sr-82 solutions.
SolutionStep 1 ColorPass/FailStep 2 ColorPass/FailStep 3 ColorPass/FailAccept/RejectExpected Result
6 M HClyellowpassyellowpassyellowfailRejectReject
4 M HClyellowpassyellowpassyellowfailRejectReject
1 M HClyellowpassyellowpassyellowfailRejectReject
0.6 M HClyellowpassyellowpassyellowfailRejectReject
0.55 M HClyellowpassyellowpassyellowfailRejectReject
0.5 M HClyellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
0.1 M HClyellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
0.1 M HClyellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
0.1 M HClyellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
0.05 M HClyellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
0.04 M HClyellowpasspurplefailN/A RejectReject
NH4OH-NH4ClPurplefailNA NA RejectReject
Sat. NH4ClyellowpasspurplefailNA RejectReject
wateryellowpasspurplefailNA RejectReject
Sr-82 sample 1yellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
Sr-82 sample 2yellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept
Sr-82 sample 3yellowpassyellowpasspurplepassAcceptAccept

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fitzsimmons, J. A Quality Control Assay to Access the HCl Molarity of Radionuclide Solutions. Chemosensors 2016, 4, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4020009

AMA Style

Fitzsimmons J. A Quality Control Assay to Access the HCl Molarity of Radionuclide Solutions. Chemosensors. 2016; 4(2):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4020009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fitzsimmons, Jonathan. 2016. "A Quality Control Assay to Access the HCl Molarity of Radionuclide Solutions" Chemosensors 4, no. 2: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4020009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop