Next Article in Journal
Chemical Tuning and Absorption Properties of Iridium Photosensitizers for Photocatalytic Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Potassium C–F Interactions and the Structural Consequences in N,N′-Bis(2,6-difluorophenyl)formamidinate Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
Photophysics of BODIPY Dyes as Readily-Designable Photosensitisers in Light-Driven Proton Reduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kudos and Renaissance of s-Block Metal Chemistry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into Molecular Beryllium–Silicon Bonds

Faculty of Chemistry and Center for NanoIntegration (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, DE-45117 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2017, 5(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics5020022
Submission received: 23 March 2017 / Revised: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 4 April 2017 / Published: 10 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue s-Block Metal Complexes)

Abstract

:
We present the synthesis of two silyl beryllium halides HypSiBeX∙(thf) (HypSi = Si(SiMe3)3, X = Cl 2a, I 4a) and the molecular structure of 2a as determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Compounds 2a and 4a were characterized via multi-nuclear NMR spectroscopy (1H, 9Be, 13C, 29Si), and the bonding situation was further investigated using quantum chemical calculations (with the addition of further halides X = F 1b, Cl 2b, Br 3b, I 4b). The nature of the beryllium silicon bond in the context of these compounds is highlighted and discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The organometallic and coordination chemistry of beryllium has gained attention as several groups, including ours, started to focus their research on this rather unknown and hitherto neglected element [1]. In the last five years, many groundbreaking discoveries, including the first compound with beryllium in the formal oxidation state 0 by the Braunschweig group [2], a beryllium-induced C–N bond activation in an N-heterocyclic carbene [3], the structural characterization of the long known Be(N(SiMe3)2)2 [4], the synthesis of the first bis(diphenylphosphinimino)methanide and -methanediide beryllium complexes [5], and the synthesis of ether-free beryllium organyls [6], were reported. Even in the field of material chemistry and catalysis, groups around the world started to investigate the unique properties of beryllium compounds [7]. The prejudices and reservations that people might have against beryllium due to its potential risks were discussed and elucidated in our recently reported review [8].
Part of our research focuses on the synthesis of heteroleptic beryllium compounds bearing at least one halide of the RBeX type (R = organic substituent, X = F, Cl, Br, I) and their structural characterization via single crystal X-ray diffraction, multi-nuclear NMR, and quantum mechanical calculations to achieve a deeper understanding of the bonding nature in beryllium compounds [4,9,10]. This led to several publications, which highlight the subtle influences of the substituents on the chemical and electronic properties of the resulting compounds. We extended these studies now to silicon-containing substituents, the heavier congener of carbon. To the best of our knowledge, compounds of the type R’BeX (R = SiR3, X = F, Cl, Br, I) with a beryllium–silicon bond have to date rarely been studied [11,12]. Our findings are presented in this work to blaze a trail for research on the chemistry of beryllium–silicon compounds and for a deeper understanding of the beryllium–silicon bond.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

The reaction of LiSi(SiMe3)∙(thf)2.6 with BeX2 (X = Cl, I) in a 1:1 mixture of dry toluene/thf at 60 °C led to the formation of 2a and 4a after stirring for 16 h (Scheme 1), which was confirmed by 9Be NMR spectroscopy. All volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dried for 2 h in an oil-pump vacuum. The residue was then dissolved in a small amount of dry toluene and filtrated, and the compounds were crystallized at −28 °C (yield: 2a 83%, 4a 87%). 2a and 4a were obtained as colorless crystalline solids, which dissolve easily in a number of typical coordinating (Et2O, THF) and non-coordinating solvents (hexane, cyclohexane, toluene) and were characterized by multi-nuclear NMR spectroscopy (1H, 9Be, 13C, 29Si; Figures S1–S8).

2.2. NMR-Spectroscopy

The 9Be NMR shifts underline that the tetrahedral geometry of the complexes that is found in the solid state is also preserved in solution. The thf molecules are still coordinating with the beryllium. An overview of typical 9Be NMR shifts of several heteroleptic complexes of the general type RBeX depending on the coordination mode is given in Table 1, which also includes ether-coordinated BeX2(OEt2)2 (X = Cl, Br), which adopt tetrahedral structures both in solution and in the solid state [13,14], silyl-substituted compounds CpBeSiR3 and Be[N(SiMe3)2]2, respectively.

2.3. Solid State Structure

Compound 2a crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n with the molecule placed on the special position. Be is coordinated by Cl, its symmetry equivalent, a thf molecule, and a hypersilyl ligand in a slightly distorted tetrahedral fashion (Figure 1). Crystallographic data of 2a are given in Tables S1–S5.
The bond angles around the central Be atom range from 96.5(2)° to 118.5(2)°, and the largest ones involve the central Si of the hypersilyl group. This distortion most likely results from the vast steric demand of the hypersilyl group. The Cl atom bridges the Be1 and its symmetry equivalent in a slightly asymmetric manner, as the difference between both Be–Cl bonds is about 0.1 Å. The Be–Cl bond lengths in 2a (2.099(5), 2.112(5) Å) match well with the mean value of 2.02(7) Å for Be–Cl single bonds found in 48 structures with tetrahedrally coordinated Be atoms in the CSD [20]. The Be–O bond length also agrees with the mean value of 1.62(5) Å (187 hits), but weakly bonded thf molecules show Be–O bond lengths of up to 1.737 Å [21]. To the best of our knowledge, CpBeSiMe3 [12] and Be(SitBu3)2 [11] are the only compounds containing a Be–Si bond that to date have been structurally characterized. From these structure determinations, three independent values for the bond lengths are available (2.1930(10) Å, 2.2085(10) Å Be(SitBu3)2 [22], and 2.185(2) Å CpBeSiMe3 [12]). The fourth value available now from 2a is in the same order but slightly larger (2:239(5) Å), which may again be attributed to the high steric demand of the hypersilyl group. The Si–Si bond lengths and Si–Si–Si bond angles within the hypersilyl substituent are almost identical to those previously reported for compounds containing this specific substituent.

2.4. Quantum Chemical Calculations

Quantum chemical calculations were performed to gain a deeper understanding of the bonding situation in the heteroleptic complexes HypSiBeX∙(thf) (HypSi = Si(SiMe3)3, X = F 1b, Cl 2b, Br 3b, I 4b). The crystal structure of 2a was used as a starting point to model the gas phase structures of 1b4b. Geometries of these model structures were then optimized using RI-DFT [23,24,25,26] methods with the B3-LYP functional [27,28] and TZVPP basis sets [29] and third generation Becke–Johnson-damped dispersion correction [30,31]. To further investigate the influence of the coordination mode of Be on the NMR shift of this compound, additional model systems without the coordinated thf molecules were designed (1c4c) and optimized with the same methods. NMR chemical shifts of 1b4b and 1c4c were calculated via GIAO methods [32]. Shared electron number (SEN) [33] calculations, electron localization function (ELF) [34,35] plots and localized orbital locator (LOL) [36] plots were performed for 1b4b.
The gas phase structures of 1b4b (Figure 2) are very similar to the crystal structure of 2a. They each show dimeric structures, in which the Be atom adopts distorted tetrahedral coordination environments, and approximately show an inversion center between the two halide ligands (Figures S17–S20, Table S6). The two Be–X units approximately form a rhombus. Table 2 summarizes important bond lengths and angles of 2a in comparison to those calculated for 1b4b.
The Be–X bond lengths increase with increasing atomic number from F to I, while the Be–Si and Be–O bond lengths marginally decrease, which could be due to slightly reduced steric stress. In accord with Bent’s rule and the steric demand of the halogen atoms, the X–Be–X angle increase with decreasing electronegativity and increasing atomic radii of the halide ion (X) from fluoride to iodide and the Be–X–Be angles consequently decrease. Moreover, the other angles also vary slightly. The crystal structure of 2a is in good agreement with the calculated gas phase structure of 2b for most displayed values. Slight differences in the Cl–Cl–Be–Si dihedral angle can be attributed to packing effects.
The gas phase structures of 1c4c, which have been calculated without any coordinating thf molecule, show trigonally coordinated Be atoms (Figures S21–S24). For 1c3c, the two Be–X units approximately lie in a rhombus (Be–X–X–Be dihedral angle of 179.7° to 178.5°), while that rhombus is significantly folded in 4c (Be–X–X–Be dihedral angle of 163.6°). Similarly, Be and the halide substituents lie approximately in the same plane for 1c3c (X–X–Be–Si dihedral angle of 179.3° to 178.7°), while 4c shows a significant deviation from planarity (X–X–Be–Si dihedral angle of 170.3°).
The calculated NMR chemical shifts (Table 3) of 1b4b and 1c4c are not very close to the measured signals, but fall in line with our calculations of other beryllium shifts, which tend to be higher than measured signals. Nonetheless, it can be clearly seen that there is a difference between the calculated chemical shifts of these substances for the thf-coordinated 1b4b in comparison to the thf-free 1c4c. Unfortunately, the shifts of these species overlap and one cannot clearly distinguish between thf-containing or thf-less species just by checking these theoretical values. Thus, a comparison with other measured Be-containing species is needed to evaluate or predict coordination modes.
The Be–Si bonds were investigated by looking at their shared electron number (SEN) values. The values range from 1.42 for 1b and 1.36 for 2b and 3b, to 1.31 for 4b. These values are within the typical range for covalent bonds between Si–Si, Si–C and C–H in these molecules, which suggests that the Be–Si bond is quite covalent. This is exemplified further by looking at electron localization function (ELF) and localized orbital locator (LOL) plots (see also Figures S9–S16) of the Be–Si–Cl plane in Figure 3, where a Be–Si bond electron pair can clearly be seen around (x,y) = (6.58,4.52) bohr.

3. Materials and Methods

Beryllium and its compounds are regarded as highly toxic and carcinogenic and they also have an allergic potential if inhaled with the risk of causing chronic beryllium disease (CBD) [37]. They should therefore be handled with appropriate safety precautions [8]. All experiments described herein were performed in fume hoods, in gloveboxes, or with advanced Schlenk techniques under extremely dry and oxygen-free (Caution) Ar atmosphere. HypSiLi∙(thf)2.6 was prepared in accordance with a procedure found in the literature [38]. The amount of coordinated thf in the HypSiLi∙(thf)2.6 was determined by adding a definite amount of 1,3,5-tri-tBu-benzene to the solution of the ligand in C6D6, followed by comparative integration of the signals. BeCl2 and BeI2 were synthesized from the elements at elevated temperatures followed by high-temperature, high-vacuum fractional sublimation [39]. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 300 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) at 25 °C at 300.1 MHz (1H), 42.4 MHz (9Be), 75.5 MHz (13C), and 59.6 MHz (29Si). 1H and 13C{1H}–NMR spectra were referenced to internal C6D5H (δ(1H) = 7.154 ppm; δ(13C) = 128.0 ppm), 9Be-NMR was referenced to external BeSO4 in D2O (δ(9Be) = 0 ppm) and 29Si spectra were referenced to an external standard of neat Si(CH3)4 (δ(29Si) = 0 ppm). Elemental analyses were not determined because of the potential toxicity of the complexes. The purity of the compounds was verified by NMR spectroscopy. All reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of HypSiBeX∙(thf) (X = Cl 2a, I 4a)

Equimolar amounts of HypSiLi∙(thf)2.6 (0.221 g, 0.5 mmol) and BeX2 (X = Cl 0.040 g, 0.5 mmol, I 0.131 g, 0.5 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of toluene (20 mL) and thf (1 mL). The resulting solution was heated to 60 °C and stirred for 16 h. After that, all volatiles were removed in vacuum, and the residue was dried for an additional 2 h in an oil-pump vacuum. The residue was extracted with 2 mL of toluene and 1 mL of thf and filtrated by using a Teflon cannula, which was covered with a glass micro fiber filter (Whatman®, ME14 2LE Maidenstone, Kent, UK). Compounds 2a and 4a were obtained after storage of the clear solutions at −28 °C for 12 h.
HypSiBeCl∙(thf) (2a): Yield: 140 mg (96%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, thf-d8, 25 °C): δ = 0.18 (s, 27H, Me), 1.72 (s (broad), 0.54H, thf), 3.58 (s (broad), 0.62H, thf). 9Be NMR (C6D6, 42.2 MHz, 25 °C): δ = 2.45 (s). 13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C): δ = 1.68 (s, Me), 25.46 (thf), 67.58 (thf). 29Si NMR (59.6 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C): δ = −82.05 (s, (Me3Si)3Si, −12.99 (s, (Me3Si)3Si).
HypSiBeI∙(thf) (4a): Yield: 157 mg (93%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, thf-d8, 25 °C): δ = 0.17 (s, 27H, Me), 1.74 (quint., 5.83H, thf), 3.58 (quint., 5.03H, thf). 9Be NMR (C6D6, 42.2 MHz, 25 °C): δ = −0.92 (s). 13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C): δ = 1.87 (Me), 25.37 (thf), 67.46 (thf). 29Si NMR (59.6 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C): δ = −83.94 (s, (Me3Si)3Si, −14.91 (s (Me3Si)3Si).
Single crystal X-ray diffraction. [C26 H70 Be2 Cl2 O2 Si8], M = 728.46, colorless crystal (0.07 mm × 0.05 mm × 0.05 mm); monoclinic, space group P21/n; a = 10.3667(7) Å, b = 18.8628(12) Å, c = 11.3870(7) Å; α = 90°, β = 98.150(4)°, γ = 90°, V = 2204.2(2) Å3; Z = 2; μ = 0.386 mm−1; ρcalc = 1.098 g⋅cm−3; 17848 reflections (θmax = 26.46°), 4491 unique (Rint = 0.1159); 190 parameters; largest max./min in the final difference Fourier synthesis 0.451 e⋅Å−3/−0.407 e⋅Å−3; max./min. transmission 0.75/0.67; R1 = 0.0564 (I > 2σ(I)), wR2 = 0.1242 (all data).
The crystal was mounted on a nylon loop in inert oil. Data were collected on a Bruker AXS D8 Kappa diffractometer with APEX2 detector (mono-chromated MoKα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å). The structure was solved by Direct Methods (SHELXS-97) [40] and refined anisotropically by full-matrix least-squares on F2 (SHELXL-2014) [41,42]. Absorption correction was performed semi-empirically from equivalent reflections on basis of multi-scans (Bruker AXS APEX2, Karlsruhe, Germany). Hydrogen atoms were refined using rigid methyl groups.
CCDC-1539267 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4. Conclusions

We successfully synthesized compounds of the general type HypSiBeX∙(thf) (HypSi = Si(SiMe3)3, X = Cl 2a, I 4a) bearing a Be–Si–bond and structurally characterized (2a), the third example of such a compound. The bond lengths in 2a were compared with those obtained from quantum chemical calculations, which were expanded to the other halides as well as on the solvent-free complexes. Further analysis of the calculated data provided a deeper insight into so far not properly investigated Be–Si bond and demonstrated that the Be–Si–bond is mainly covalent (SEN: 1.4-1.3). The calculated 9Be NMR shifts shows that tetrahedral coordination mode is also present in solution, which fits well to the reported 9Be NMR shifts of comparable compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/5/2/22/s1, Figures S1–S24, Tables S1–S6, cif and checkcif files.

Acknowledgments

Stephan Schulz thanks the University of Duisburg-Essen for financial support and Dieter Bläser for collecting the crystallographic data.

Author Contributions

Dominik Naglav, Kevin Dzialkowski, and Stephan Schulz conceived and designed the experiments; Dominik Naglav and Kevin Dzialkowski performed the experiments; Christoph Wölper analyzed the X-ray structure; Briac Tobey and Georg Jansen performed and analyzed the quantum mechanical calculations; Dominik Naglav and Kevin Dzialkowski analyzed the NMR data; Dominik Naglav, Briac Tobey, Kevin Dzialkowski, Christoph Wölper, and Stephan Schulz wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iversen, K.J.; Couchman, S.A.; Wilson, D.J.; Dutton, J.L. Modern organometallic and coordination chemistry of beryllium. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 297–298, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arrowsmith, M.; Braunschweig, H.; Celik, M.A.; Dellermann, T.; Dewhurst, R.D.; Ewing, W.C.; Hammond, K.; Kramer, T.; Krummenacher, I.; Mies, J.; et al. Neutral zero-valent s-block complexes with strong multiple bonding. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 638–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arrowsmith, M.; Hill, M.S.; Kociok-Kohn, G.; MacDougall, D.J.; Mahon, M.F. Beryllium-induced C–N bond activation and ring opening of an N-heterocyclic carbene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51, 2098–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Naglav, D.; Neumann, A.; Bläser, D.; Wölper, C.; Haack, R.; Jansen, G.; Schulz, S. Bonding situation in Be(N(SiMe3)2)2—An experimental and computational study. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3889–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bayram, M.; Naglav, D.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Synthesis and Structure of Bis(diphenylphosphinimino)methanide and Bis(diphenylphosphinimino)methanediide Beryllium Complexes. Organometallics 2016, 35, 2378–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buchner, M.R.; Müller, M.; Rudel, S.S. Beryllium Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Properties, and Reactivity of (PMe3)2BeCl2 and (Ph2PC3H6PPh2)BeCl2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhu, G.; Su, H.; Chan, S.H.; Sun, Q. Be12O12 Nano-cage as a Promising Catalyst for CO2 Hydrogenation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Naglav, D.; Buchner, M.R.; Bendt, G.; Kraus, F.; Schulz, S. Off the Beaten Track—A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Beryllium Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 10562–10576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Naglav, D.; Bläser, D.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Synthesis and characterization of heteroleptic 1-tris(pyrazolyl)borate beryllium complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Naglav, D.; Tobey, B.; Neumann, A.; Bläser, D.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Synthesis, Solid-State Structures, and Computational Studies of Half-Sandwich Cp*BeX (X = Cl, Br, I) Compounds. Organometallics 2015, 34, 3072–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lerner, H.-W.; Scholz, S.; Bolte, M.; Wiberg, N.; Nöth, H.; Krossing, I. Synthesis and Structures of Alkaline-Earth Metal Supersilanides: tBu3SiMX and tBu3Si−M−SitBu3 (M = Be, Mg; X = Cl, Br). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 2003, 666–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saulys, D.A.; Powell, D.R. Synthesis, Experimental/Theoretical Characterization, and Thermolysis Chemistry of CpBe(SiMe3), a Molecule Containing an Unprecedented Beryllium–Silicon Bond. Organometallics 2003, 22, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Niemeyer, M.; Power, P.P. Synthesis, 9Be NMR Spectroscopy, and Structural Characterization of Sterically Encumbered Beryllium Compounds. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 4688–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ruhlandt-Senge, K.; Bartlett, R.A.; Olmstead, M.M.; Power, P.P. Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the Beryllium Compounds [Be(2,4,6-Me3C6H2)2(OEt2)], [Be{O(2,4,6-t-Bu3C6H2}(OEt2)], and [Be{S(S(2,4,6-t-Be3C6H2)}2(thf)]2(THF)]PhMe and Determination of the Structure of [BeCl2(OEt2)2]. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, R.; Parkin, G. [Tris(3-tert-butylpyrazolyl)hydroborato]beryllium hydride: Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of a terminal beryllium hydride complex. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arrowsmith, M.; Hill, M.S.; Kociok-Kohn, G.; MacDougall, D.J.; Mahon, M.F.; Mallov, I. Three-coordinate beryllium beta-diketiminates: Synthesis and reduction chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 13408–13418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Arrowsmith, M.; Crimmin, M.R.; Hill, M.S.; Kociok-Kohn, G. Beryllium derivatives of a phenyl-substituted beta-diketiminate: A well-defined ring opening reaction of tetrahydrofuran. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 9720–9726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Naglav, D.; Tobey, B.; Dzialkowski, K.; Jansen, G.; Neumann, A.; Bläser, D.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Heteroleptic Diiminophosphinate Beryllium Complexes. Unpublished results. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chmely, S.C.; Hanusa, T.P.; Brennessel, W.W. Bis(1,3-trimethylsilylallyl)beryllium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 5870–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Allen, F.H. The Cambridge Structural Database: A quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2002, 58, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lorenz, V.; Fischer, A.; Edelmann, F.T. Silsesquioxane chemistry, The first beryllium silsesquioxane: Synthesis and structure of [Cy7Si7O12BeLi]2 2THF. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2000, 3, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lerner, W.; Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. Supply of the value for the second independent molecule. Personal Communication, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. Efficient molecular numerical integration schemes. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eichkorn, K.; Treutler, O.; Öhm, H.; Häser, M.; Ahlrichs, R. Auxiliary basis sets to approximate Coulomb potentials. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Eichkorn, K.; Weigend, F.; Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. Auxiliary basis sets for main row atoms and transition metals and their use to approximate Coulomb potentials. Theor. Chim. Acta 1997, 97, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Von Arnim, M.; Ahlrichs, R. Performance of parallel TURBOMOLE for density functional calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1746–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stephens, P.J.; Chabalowski, C.F.; Frisch, M.J. Ab Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force Fields. J. Chem. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623–11627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H–Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kollwitz, M.; Gauss, J. A direct implementation of the GIAO-MBPT(2) method for calculating NMR chemical shifts. Application to the naphthalenium and anthracenium ions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 260, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davidson, E.R. Electronic Population Analysis of Molecular Wavefunctions. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 46, 3320–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Becke, A.D.; Edgecombe, K.E. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silvi, B.; Savin, A. Classifaction of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 1994, 371, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schmider, H.; Becke, A. Chemical content of the kinetic energy density. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2000, 527, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumberger, O.; Schmidbaur, H. Warum ist Beryllium so toxisch? Chem. Unserer Zeit 1993, 27, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gutekunst, G.; Brook, A.G. Tris(trimethylsilyl)silyllithium·3 thf: A stable crystalline silyllithium reagent. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 225, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brauer, G. Handbuch der Präparativen Anorganischen Chemie, 3rd ed.; Ferdinand Enke: Stuttgart, Germany, 1975; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheldrick, G.M. Phase annealing in SHELX-90: Direct methods for larger structures. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Crystallogr. 1990, 46, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hubschle, C.B.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Dittrich, B. ShelXle: A Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2a and 4a.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2a and 4a.
Inorganics 05 00022 sch001
Figure 1. Solid-state structures of 2a (pale colored part generated by inversion); thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability levels.
Figure 1. Solid-state structures of 2a (pale colored part generated by inversion); thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability levels.
Inorganics 05 00022 g001
Figure 2. Calculated gas phase structure of 2b (left) and 2c (right); X displayed in green, Be in orange; Si in ocher, C in grey, O in red and H in white.
Figure 2. Calculated gas phase structure of 2b (left) and 2c (right); X displayed in green, Be in orange; Si in ocher, C in grey, O in red and H in white.
Inorganics 05 00022 g002
Figure 3. 2D-plots of the Si–Be–Cl plane: (left) ELF; (right) LOL.
Figure 3. 2D-plots of the Si–Be–Cl plane: (left) ELF; (right) LOL.
Inorganics 05 00022 g003
Table 1. Overview of typical 9Be NMR shifts depending on their complex geometry and their respective coordination modes.
Table 1. Overview of typical 9Be NMR shifts depending on their complex geometry and their respective coordination modes.
Compound9Be NMR Shifts (δ in ppm)SolventCoordination ModeCoordination NumberLiterature
(Me3Si)3SiBeCl∙(thf)2.45thf-d8tetrahedral4this work
(Me3Si)3SiBeI∙(thf)−0.92thf-d8tetrahedral4this work
BeCl2(OEt2)22.6C6D6tetrahedral4[13]
BeBr2(OEt2)23.0C6D6tetrahedral4[13]
CpBeSiMe3−27.70C6D6aromatic (η5)6[12]
CpBe(SiMe2SiMe3)−27.20C6D6aromatic (η5)6[12]
TpBeF4.54thf-d8/C7D8 3:5tetrahedral4[9]
TpBeCl4.95thf-d8tetrahedral4[9]
TpBeBr5.15thf-d8/C6D6 1:3tetrahedral4[9]
TpBeI4.66thf-d8tetrahedral4[9]
TptBuBeCl2.7C6D6tetrahedral4[15]
TptBuBeBr2.4C6D6tetrahedral4[15]
TptBuBeI1.3C6D6tetrahedral4[15]
Cp*BeCl−14.88C6D6aromatic (η5)6[10]
Cp*BeBr−14.81C6D6aromatic (η5)6[10]
Cp*BeI−15.78C6D6aromatic (η5)6[10]
DDPBeCl12.2C6D6trigonal planar3[16,17]
DDPBeI13.4C6D6trigonal planar3[16,17]
Ph2P(NDipp)2BeCl11.36C6D6trigonal planar3[18]
Ph2P(NDipp)2BeBr11.94C6D6trigonal planar3[18]
Ph2P(NDipp)2BeI11.53C6D6trigonal planar3[18]
TerphenylBeCl∙(Et2O)12.8C6D6trigonal planar3[13]
TerphenylBeBr∙(Et2O)13.4C6D6trigonal planar3[13]
[1,3-(SiMe3)2C3H3]2Be∙(Et2O)18.2C6D6trigonal planar3[19]
Be[N(SiMe3)2]212.3C6D6linear2[4]
Be[N(SiMe3)2]29.6thf-d8linear2[4]
Be[N(SiMe3)2]212.4tol-d8linear2[4]
Cp = cyclopentadienyl (C5H5), Tp = 1-Tris(pyrazolyl)borate, TptBu = Tris(3-tert-butylpyrazolyl)hydroborato, Cp* = Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl (C5Me5), DDP = 2-((2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino)-4-((2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imino)-pent-2-enyl), Ph2P(NDipp)2 = N,N’-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl) aminoiminodi(phenyl)phosphorane, Terphenyl = 2,6-di(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)phenyl.
Table 2. Overview of calculated and observed bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 2a and 1b4b.
Table 2. Overview of calculated and observed bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 2a and 1b4b.
1b 12a2b 13b 14b 1
Be–X1.6142.101 12.1122.2922.531
Be–Si2.2492.239(5)2.2222.2132.203
Be–O1.6701.654(5)1.6701.6551.649
X–Be–X90.6096.5(2)97.498.299.0
Be–X–Be89.483.5(2)82.681.881.0
Si–Be–X1118.0116.0(2)114.6113.6112.0
Si–Be–X2123.5118.5(2)118.9118.0116.8
Si–Be–O113.4116.4(3)115.7117.1118.5
Be–X–X–Be180.0180.0(3)179.6180.0180.0
X–X–Be–Si129.1126.2(4)136.7125.5123.8
1 Values are averaged.
Table 3. Overview of calculated and observed NMR shifts for 14.
Table 3. Overview of calculated and observed NMR shifts for 14.
1234
a2.45−0.92
b6.9010.6212.1415.93
c14.0125.5329.1624.78

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naglav, D.; Tobey, B.; Dzialkowski, K.; Jansen, G.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Insights into Molecular Beryllium–Silicon Bonds. Inorganics 2017, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics5020022

AMA Style

Naglav D, Tobey B, Dzialkowski K, Jansen G, Wölper C, Schulz S. Insights into Molecular Beryllium–Silicon Bonds. Inorganics. 2017; 5(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics5020022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naglav, Dominik, Briac Tobey, Kevin Dzialkowski, Georg Jansen, Christoph Wölper, and Stephan Schulz. 2017. "Insights into Molecular Beryllium–Silicon Bonds" Inorganics 5, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics5020022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop