Next Article in Journal
Effect of Low Spin Excited States for Magnetic Anisotropy of Transition Metal Mononuclear Single Molecule Magnets
Next Article in Special Issue
Cationic Protic Imidazolylidene NHC Complexes of Cp*IrCl+ and Cp*RhCl+ with a Pyridyl Tether Formed at Ambient Temperature
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Robust Pyridyl-NHC-Ligated Rhenium Photocatalyst for CO2 Reduction in the Presence of Water and Oxygen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sterically Bulky NHC Adducts of GaMe3 and InMe3 for H2 Activation and Lactide Polymerization

Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg, CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 1 rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2018, 6(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6010023
Submission received: 22 December 2017 / Revised: 20 January 2018 / Accepted: 23 January 2018 / Published: 25 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue N-Heterocyclic Carbene Metal Complexes: From Design to Applications)

Abstract

:
The sterically bulky Ga(III) and In(III) (IPr*)MMe3 adducts (1 and 2) and (SItBu)MMe3 adducts (3 and 4) (M = Ga, In; IPr* = 1,3-bis{2,6-bis(diphenylmethyl)-4-methylphenyl}-1,3-dihydro- imidazol-2-ylidene; SItBu = 1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-imidazolidin-2-ylidene) were prepared and structurally characterized, allowing an estimation of the steric hindrance of such Lewis pairs (yields in 14: 92%, 90%, 73%, and 42%, respectively). While the IPr* adducts 1 and 2 are robust species, the more severely congested SItBu adducts 3 and 4 are more reactive and exhibit a limited stability in solution. Adduct (SItBu)GaMe3 (3) reacts quickly with H2 at room temperature to afford the corresponding aminal product, 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazolidine (5), along with free GaMe3. Such Frustrated Lewis Pair (FLP) reactivity constitutes the first instance of a H2 activation involving a simple trialkyl GaR3 species. Adduct 3 also mediates the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of rac-lactide at room temperature to afford cyclic polylactide (PLA).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thanks to their exceptional σ-donating properties and steric tunability, N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) constitute a privileged class of supporting ligands for the stabilization of various metal complexes [1,2,3,4,5]. This has led to the widespread use of NHC-supported metal species in numerous research fields, notably in metal-based homogeneous catalysis and for the characterization of unusual organometallic motifs [6,7].
The coordination (and related reactivity studies) of NHCs to oxophilic and high-oxidation-state metal centers such as group 13 metals M(III) (M = Al, Ga, In) is currently attracting growing attention [8]. For the most part, this is due to the potential usefulness of the derived Lewis adducts for novel reactivity and/or small molecule activation, in particular through Frustrated Lewis Pair (FLP) reactivity [9]. FLP reactivity has attracted tremendous attention over the past few years thanks to the ability of sterically hindered Lewis pairs and FLPs to activate numerous polar/unsaturated substrates, including H2 and CO2 [9,10,11]. In the area of group 13 metal species, we and others have shown that sterically bulky group 13 metal Lewis adducts may display limited stability and readily isomerize to their “abnormal” counterparts for steric relief of (NHC)MMe3 (Scheme 1, taking the example of adducts (ItBu)MMe3) [12,13,14].
In the case of the bulky adduct (ItBu)AlMe3, steric hindrance may also promote an unusual deprotonation of the AlMe3 moiety by ItBu in the presence of Al2Me6 [15]. The ItBu/Al(iBu)3 FLP system was also shown to activate H2 at room temperature [13]. The reactivity of lower group 13 metal Ga(III)–/In(III)–NHC Lewis pairs has been less studied, though recent studies have detailed FLP activation of various polar substrates with an NHC/GaR3 mixture (R = alkyl, carbyl) [16,17].
To further probe the structural features and reactivity of sterically hindered Ga(III) and In(III) of the type NHC–MR3 (R = alkyl, carbyl), the use of bulky NHCs IPr* and SItBu (IPr* = 1, 3-bis{2,6-bis(diphenylmethyl)-4-methylphenyl}-1,3-dihydro-imidazol-2-ylidene, SItBu = 1,3-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-imidazolidin-2-ylidene; Figure 1) for adduct formation with GaMe3 and InMe3 was studied.
We herein report the synthesis and structural characterization of such adducts and their reactivity with H2, leading, as described below, to the first instance of H2 activation by a simple NHC/GaMe3 system. Preliminary results on the use of such compounds as lactide ring-opening polymerization catalysts are also discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Adducts (IPr*)MMe3 (1, M = Ga; 2, M = In)

The superbulky NHC carbene IPr*, first reported by Marko and co-workers in 2010 [18], is frequently referred to as an “exceptionally bulky NHC with some flexible sterics” in several reports, and thus appeared to be a suitable candidate for our studies [19]. While a number of IPr*-supported complexes of late transition metals are known, the coordination of IPr* to oxophilic metal centers is thus far unreported.
The reaction of IPr*, which was prepared according to literature procedures, with a stoichiometric amount of MMe3 (room temperature, toluene, 2 h) led to the quantitative formation of corresponding (IPr*)MMe3 adducts (1, M = Ga; 2, M = In; Scheme 2), isolated in high yield as colorless solids (90% and 92% yield, respectively) [18,19]. The NMR data for 1 and 2 are consistent with the coordination of IPr* to the M(III) centers. In particular, the 13C NMR Ccarbene chemical shifts (δ 183.4 and 185.8 ppm for 1 and 2, respectively) lie in the expected range for NHC–Ga and NHC–In species and are significantly upfield shifted versus that of free IPr* (δ 220.0 ppm). Somewhat surprisingly given the steric properties of IPr*, adducts 1 and 2 are stable species in solution at room temperature, including in a coordinative solvent such as THF. Likewise, as monitored by 1H NMR, species 1 and 2 are thermally robust and retain their integrity upon prolonged heating (C6D6, 48 h, 80 °C). The latter observations sharply contrast with the instability of their (ItBu)MMe3 counterparts (Scheme 1).
As determined through X-ray crystallographic studies (XRD), the solid-state molecular structure of 2 confirmed the effective coordination of IPr* to InMe3, resulting in a four-coordinate In(III) adopting a distorted tetrahedral geometry and coplanar to the NHC heterocyclic ring (Figure 2). The In–Ccarbene bond distance (2.330(5) Å) in 2 is a bit longer than those in (IMes)InMe3 and (IPr)InMe3 (2.292(6) and 2.309(2) Å, respectively; IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1,3-dihydro-imidazol-2-ylidene; IPr = 1,3-bis{2,6-bis(1-methylethyl)phenyl})-1,3-dihydro-imidazol-2-ylidene), likely reflecting greater steric hindrance between the NHC and InMe3 in 2 [20,21]. However, the shortest contacts between IPr* and InMe3 (H···H = 2.257 Å and C···H = 2.747 Å) remain close to the sum of the van der Waals (vdW) radii of the corresponding atoms, in line with no severe steric congestion in 2 and in agreement with the observed stability of adduct (IPr*)InMe3 in solution [22].

2.2. Adducts (StBu)MMe3 (3, M = Ga; 4, M = In)

As earlier mentioned, the sterically hindered Lewis pairs (ItBu)MMe3 (M = Ga, In) are unstable and rearrange to the corresponding C4-bonded isomers (aItBu)MMe3 (Scheme 1) [12,13,14]. To avoid such isomerization, the backbone-saturated carbene StBu, prepared according to a known procedure [23], was coordinated to GaMe3 and InMe3. Thus, reaction of StBu with one equiv. of GaMe3/InMe3 (pentane, −35 °C to room temperature, 30 min) led to the formation of species (StBu)MMe3 (3, M = Ga; 4, M = In), which were isolated in moderate to good yields as highly air-sensitive colorless solids (73% and 42% yield, respectively). Unlike adducts 1 and 2, species 3 and 4 display a limited stability in common solvents. While stable for days in benzene/toluene at room temperature (under inert atmosphere), they quickly decompose to unknown species in CH2Cl2 and THF at room temperature, in line with severely hindered Lewis pairs. The NMR data for 3 and 4 only display sharp resonances that are consistent with the proposed adduct formulation. Taking the example of the In(III) species 4, the 1H NMR spectrum contains a singlet resonance for the StBu–CH2CH2 moiety (δ 2.82 ppm, 4 H), upfield shielded relative to that in free StBu (δ 1.33 ppm), as well as a characteristic singlet in the In–Me region (δ 0.01 ppm, 9 H). No evidence for adduct dissociation is observable under the studied conditions for either 3 or 4 (C6D6, room temperature).
The solid-state molecular structures of adducts 3 and 4, as established by XRD studies, confirmed the effective coordination of SItBu to the Ga(III) and In(III) metal centers, respectively (Figure 3 and Figure 4). In species 3, the Ga–Ccarbene bond distance (2.195(2) Å) is significantly longer (≈ 0.07 Å) than those in related adducts (SIMes)GaMe3 and (SIPr)GaMe3 (2.124(5) and 2.137(2) Å, respectively) [21]. The latter, together with very short contacts between the NHC and the GaMe3 moieties (shortest distances between SItBu and GaMe3: Ga···H = 2.581 Å, H···H = 2.009 Å, C···H = 2.550 Å) well below the sum of the vdW radii of the corresponding atoms, indicates that adduct 3 is severely crowded.
The solid-state molecular structure of the In(III) adduct (SItBu)InMe3 (4) features a longer In–Ccarbene bond distance (2.399(2) Å) versus those in (SIMes)InMe3 and (SIiPr)InMe3 (2.304(8) and 2.342(2) Å, respectively) [20,21]. Comparing adducts 3 and 4, the longer In–Ccarbene (versus Ga–Ccarbene) bond distance decreases steric congestion in adduct 4 (versus 3), as suggested by longer NHC/MMe3 atom contacts in 4 (shortest contacts: In···H = 2.642 Å, H···H = 2.169 Å, C···H = 2.660 Å).

2.3. Reactivity of Adducts 14 with H2

As sterically bulky Lewis adducts, the Ga- and In-based adducts are potential candidates for FLP reactivity. Ga- and In-based intermolecular FLP systems remain rare [16,17]. The reactivity of NHC adducts 14 with H2 was therefore studied. In line with their stability and robustness in solution, IPr* adducts 1 and 2 were found to not react with H2 (1.5 bar) even under prolonged heating (80 °C, C6D6, 48 h). In sharp contrast and satisfyingly, the most sterically hindered adduct (SItBu)GaMe3 (3) exhibits FLP reactivity as it reacts quickly with H2 (1.5 bar of H2, room temperature, 5 min) to quantitatively yield the corresponding aminal derivative, 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazolidine (5), along with free GaMe3, as deduced from 1H NMR data (Scheme 3) [24]. Note that neither SItBu nor GaMe3 alone react with H2 under such conditions.
A similar H2 activation was observed for the ItBu/Al(iBu)3 FLP system with H2 [13]. The formation of product 5 is likely to proceed via a H2 heterolytic cleavage (mediated to 3) to yield transient salt species (SItBu–H)(HGaMe3) (Scheme 4). The latter may then decompose via hydride transfer from the Ga center to the C2-imidazolinium atom of SItBu–H+ to afford 5 and regenerate GaMe3. Consistent with the latter proposal, a SItBu/GaMe3 mixture in a 1/0.4 ratio, i.e., with a substoichiometric amount of GaMe3, also rapidly reacted and led to the quantitative conversion of SItBu to aminal 5 along with 0.4 equiv. of free GaMe3 (Figure S8). Formally, GaMe3 thus catalyzes the formation of 5 from 3 and H2 (Scheme 4). Unlike its Ga(III) counterpart, the In(III) adduct 4 led to a complicated mixture of products upon reaction with H2 (1.5 bar of H2, room temperature, 3 h), among which only derivative 5 could be identified. The distinct reactivities towards H2 of 3 and 4 versus 5 is certainly related to greater steric hindrance between the NHC and the MMe3 fragments in 3 and 4, prompting their easier dissociation and subsequent reactivity with H2.

2.4. Reactivity of Adducts 14 with Lactide

Over the past twenty years, group 13 metal alkoxide complexes supported by various ligand platforms have been widely and successfully investigated as ring-opening polymerization (ROP) initiators of cyclic esters/carbonates for the production of well-defined biodegradable poly-esters/-carbonates [25,26,27]. More recently, the polymerization of polar/unsaturated monomers, including cyclic esters, initiated by simple Al-based Lewis adducts has attracted attention [28,29]. Such a Lewis pair polymerization (LPP) relies on the cooperative activation of the monomer by the Lewis acid/base fragments and may be related to FLP reactivity.
The Lewis adducts 14 were thus tested as lactide (LA) ROP initiators (100 equiv. of rac-lactide (rac-LA), toluene, room temperature, 18 h). Adducts 1, 2, and 4 promote the ROP of rac-lactide to quantitatively yield ill-defined and broadly disperse polylactide (PLA), as deduced from Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) data (1000 < Mn < 5000 g·mol−1, 3 < Đ < 4). On the contrary, narrow disperse PLA (Mn = 4500 g·mol−1, Đ = 1.12) was quantitatively produced using the Ga adduct 3 as the ROP catalyst. The MALDI-TOF data of the prepared PLA display peaks that are equally spaced by 72 a.u., which is consistent with transesterified PLA (Figure S9). Also, both the mass values and the 1H NMR data for the isolated PLA agree with the absence of any chain-end signals, and, therefore, with a cyclic PLA (Figure S10, SI). We recently reported the formation of cyclic PLA using related NHC–AlMe3 Lewis pairs as lactide ROP catalysts [20]. It therefore seems likely that an analogous ROP mechanism is presently at play, involving a zwitterionic chain growing species that undergoes an intramolecular nucleophilic attack to form cyclic PLA and regenerate adduct 3 (Scheme 5).

3. Materials and Methods

All experiments were carried out under N2 using standard Schlenk techniques or in an MBraun Unilab glovebox (Mbraun, Garching, Germany). Toluene and pentane were collected after being passed through drying columns and stored over activated molecular sieves (4 Å) for 24 h in a glovebox prior to use. Tetrahydrofuran was distilled over Na/benzophenone and stored over activated molecular sieves (4 Å) for 24 h in a glovebox prior to use. CD2Cl2 and C6D6 were distilled from CaH2, degassed under a N2 flow, and stored over activated molecular sieves (4 Å) in a glovebox prior to use. GaMe3 and InMe3 were purchased from Strem Corporation (MA, USA). IPr* and 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazolin-2-ylidene (SItBu) [18,23]. The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AC 300, 400, or 500 MHz NMR spectrometers in Teflon-valved J-Young NMR tubes. 1H and 13C chemical shifts are reported versus SiMe4 and were determined by reference to the residual 1H and 13C solvent peaks. Mass spectra were performed at the Mass Spectrometry Department of the University of Strasbourg. Mass spectra were acquired on a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MALDI–TOF–TOF Autoflex II TOF-TOF, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a nitrogen laser (λ = 337 nm). An external multipoint calibration was carried out before each measurement with a standard peptide mixture and a standard protein mixture (depending on the mass range analysed). Scan accumulation and data processing were performed with FlexAnalysis 3.4 software (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). α-Cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid (CHCA), dithranol (DIT), or super-DHB (a 9/1 mixture of dihydroxybenzoid acid/2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzoic acid) was used as the matrix for analysis of the prepared PLA samples. SEC analyses were performed on a SEC system equipped with a Shimadzu RID10A refractometer detector using HPLC-grade THF as an eluant (MilliporeSigma, MA, USA). Molecular weights and polydispersity indices (PDIs) were calculated using polystyrene standards. Molecular weight numbers (Mn) were corrected with the appropriate correcting factor (0.58) for the Mn values.

3.1. Synthesis of (IPr*)MMe3 (1, M = Ga; 2, M = In)

In a glovebox, a toluene solution of free carbene IPr* (400 mg, 0.438 mmol) was added dropwise via a pipette of toluene solution (10 mL) of MMe3 (M= Ga or In, 0.438 mmol) under vigorous stirring. The latter mixture was stirred for 1h to room temperature then dried in vacuo to afford a colorless solid residue that was washed twice with pentane. It was further dried in vacuo to quantitatively afford the corresponding (IPr*)GaMe3 (1) and (IPr*)InMe3 (2) adducts as NMR-pure colorless solids. Data for compound 1. 92% yield. X-ray quality crystals were grown from a pentane/toluene solution cooled at −35 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.08 (s, 9H, Ga(CH3)3), 1.78 (s, 6H, p-CH3), 5.02 (s, 2H, CHIm), 5.69 (s, 4H, CHPh2), 6.74–6.86 (m, 20H, CHPh), 7.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, CHPh), 7.14 (s, 4H, CHAr), 7.20 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 8H, CHPh), 7.59 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 8H, CHPh) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, C6D6): δ = −3.2 (Ga(CH3)3), 21.3 (p-CH3), 52.2 (CHPh2), 123.6 (CHIm), 126.6, 127.2, 128.8, 129.8, 130.3, 131.1, 135.1, 140.0, 142.5, 143.2, 144.8, 183.4 (Ccarbene) ppm. Data for compound 2. 90% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.11 (s, 9H, In(CH3)3), 1.77 (s, 6H, p-CH3), 5.11 (s, 2H, CHIm), 5.66 (s, 4H, CHPh2), 6.75–6.88 (m, 20H, CHPh), 7.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, CHPh), 7.13 (s, 4H, CHAr), 7.19 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 8H, CHPh), 7.52 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 8H, CHPh) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, C6D6): δ = −7.7 (In(CH3)3), 21.3 (p-CH3), 52.1 (CHPh2), 124.1 (CHIm), 126.7, 127.2, 128.4, 128.7, 129.8, 130.5, 131.0, 135.4, 140.1, 142.5, 143.2, 144.5, 185.8 (Ccarbene) ppm.

3.2. (SItBu)MMe3 (3, M = Ga; 4, M = In)

In a glovebox, a precooled pentane solution (−35 °C, 10 mL) of free carbene 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazolin-2-ylidene (SItBu, 100.0 mg, 0.55 mmol) was added dropwise via a pipette to a precooled (−35 °C) pentane solution (5 mL) of MMe3 (M = Ga or In, 0.55 mmol) under vigorous stirring. The resulting colorless solution was allowed to warm to room temperature, provoking, upon warming, the massive precipitation of a colorless solid. The latter suspension was stirred for 10 min at room temperature after which it was filtered through a glass frit. The collected colorless solid was dried in vacuo to afford the corresponding adduct (SItBu)MMe3 (3, M = Ga; 4, M = In). For both 3 and 4, X-ray quality crystals were grown from a saturated pentane solution cooled at −35 °C. Data for compound 3. 123 mg, 73% yield. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.06 (s, 9H, Ga(CH3)3), 1.32 (s, 18H, tBu), 2.83 (s, 4H, (CH2)Im) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.8 (Ga(CH3)3), 30.1 (C(CH3)3), 44.7 ((CH2)Im), 54.6 (C(CH3)3), 232.1 (Ccarbene) ppm. Data for compound 4. 79 mg, 42% yield. Anal. Calcd. for C14H31InN: C 49.13, H 9.13; found: C 49.24, H 9.12; 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.01 (s, 9H, In(CH3)3), 1.31 (s, 18H, tBu), 2.82 (s, 4H, (CH2)Im) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, C6D6): δ = −0.3 (In(CH3)3), 30.1 (C(CH3)3), 45.0 ((CH2)Im), 55.2 (C(CH3)3), 223.3 (Ccarbene) ppm.

3.3. Reaction of Adducts 14 with H2

A Teflon-valved J-Young NMR tube containing a C6D6 solution of the desired adduct (NHC)MMe3 (10 mg, NHC = IPr*, ItBu or SItBu, M = Ga or In, 0.5 mL,) was charged with H2 (1.5 bar) at room temperature. The reaction was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy until consumption of the starting (NHC)MMe3 adduct was completed. In the case of adduct 3, immediate and quantitative conversion to 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazolidine and free GaMe3 was observed.
1,3-Di-tert-butylimidazolidine [24]. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = 1.00 (s, 18H, tBu), 2.70 (s, 4H, –N–CH2–CH2–N–), 3.67 (s, 2H, N–CH2–N).

3.4. Typical Procedure for the ROP of Lactide Initiated by Complexes 14

In a N2-filled glovebox, the desired Lewis pair initiator (0.05 mmol) was charged in a vial equipped with a Teflon®-tight screw-cap and rac-lactide solution (100 equiv., [rac-lactide]0 = 1 M, toluene) was added via a syringe all at once. The reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at room temperature and subsequently was quenched with cold MeOH, provoking the precipitation of the polymer. The latter was then washed several times with MeOH, dried in vacuo and subsequently analyzed by SEC. In most cases, a MALDI–TOF MS analysis of the isolated polymers was performed. Catalytic runs under a given set of conditions were all duplicated.

4. Conclusions

The sterically bulky NHC–GaMe3 and NHC–InMe3 adducts (NHC = IPr*, SItBu) were prepared and characterized, and their level of steric congestion was assessed through structural analysis. All data agree with the IPr* adducts 1 and 2 being robust and stable adducts under various conditions. In contrast, the more severely congested SItBu adducts 3 and 4 are more reactive: this is best exemplified by the fast reaction of (SItBu)GaMe3 (3) with H2 at room temperature to afford the corresponding aminal product, the mechanism of which is currently being studied. Such an FLP reactivity constitutes the first instance of a H2 activation involving GaMe3, and further exemplifies the usefulness of bulky NHC ligands in FLP chemistry [30]. Adduct 3 was also found to mediate the ROP of rac-lactide at room temperature to afford cyclic PLA.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/6/1/23/s1, CIF files for adducts 2, 3, and 4 (CCDC 1813207, 1813208, and 1813209, respectively). NMR spectra of all compounds. MALDI–TOF and 1H NMR data of the produced PLA.
Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CNRS and the University for financial support.

Author Contributions

Samuel Dagorne and Béatrice Jacques designed the experiments; Anaëlle Bolley, Gilles Schnee and Lucas Thévenin performed the experiments; Samuel Dagorne and Béatrice Jacques wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Díez-González, S. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: From Laboratories Curiosities to Efficient Synthetic Tools, 2nd ed.; RSC Catalysis Series; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourissou, D.; Guerret, O.; Gabbaï, F.P.; Bertrand, G. Stable Carbenes. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 39–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Herrmann, W.A. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: A New Concept in Organometallic Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Frémont, P.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S.P. Carbenes: Synthesis, properties, and organometallic chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 862–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bellemin-Laponnaz, S.; Dagorne, S. Group 1 and 2 and Early Transition Metal Complexes Bearing N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Coordination Chemistry, Reactivity, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8747–8774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Y.; Robinson, G.H. Carbene-stabilized main group diatomic allotropes. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Roesky, H.W. Chemistry of low valent silicon. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 730, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fliedel, C.; Schnee, G.; Avilés, T.; Dagorne, S. Group 13 metal (Al, Ga, In, Tl) complexes supported by heteroatom-bonded carbene ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 275, 63–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uhl, W.; Würthwein, E.-U. Novel Al-based FLP systems. Top. Curr. Chem. 2013, 334, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Stephan, D.W.; Erker, G. Frustrated Lewis pair chemistry: Development and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stephan, D.W.; Erker, G. Frustrated Lewis pairs: Metal-free hydrogen activation and more. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 46–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schmitt, A.-L.; Schnee, G.; Welter, R.; Dagorne, S. Unusual reactivity in organoaluminium and NHC chemistry: Deprotonation of AlMe3 by an NHC moiety involving the formation of a sterically bulky NHC–AlMe3 Lewis adduct. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2480–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schnee, G.; Nieto Faza, O.; Specklin, D.; Jacques, B.; Karmazin, L.; Welter, R.; Silva Lopez, O.; Dagorne, S. Normal-to-Abnormal NHC Rearrangement of AlIII, GaIII, and InIII Trialkyl Complexes: Scope, Mechanism, Reactivity Studies, and H2 Activation. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 17959–17972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Uzelac, M.; Hernán-Gómez, A.; Armstrong, D.R.; Kennedy, A.R.; Hevia, E. Rational synthesis of normal, abnormal and anionic NHC–Gallium alkyl complexes: Structural, stability and isomerization insights. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 5719–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Schnee, G.; Specklin, D.; Djukic, J.-P.; Dagorne, S. Deprotonation of Al2Me6 by Sterically Bulky NHCs: Scope, Rationale through DFT Studies, and Application in the Methylenation of Carbonyl Substrates. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1726–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uzelac, M.; Kennedy, A.R.; Hevia, E. Trans-Metal-Trapping Meets Frustrated-Lewis-Pair Chemistry: Ga(CH2SiMe3)3-Induced C–H Functionalizations. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 8615–8626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Uzelac, M.; Armstrong, D.R.; Kennedy, E.R.; Hevia, E. Understanding the Subtleties of Frustrated Lewis Pair Activation of Carbonyl Compounds by N-Heterocyclic Carbene/Alkyl Gallium Pairings. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 15826–15833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Berthon-Gelloz, G.; Siegler, M.A.; Spek, A.L.; Tinant, B.; Reek, J.N.H.; Marko, I.E. IPr* an easily accessible highly hindered N-heterocyclic carbene. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 1444–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gómez-Suárez, A.; Ramón, R.S.; Songis, O.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Cazin, C.S.J.; Nolan, S.P. Influence of a Very Bulky N-Heterocyclic Carbene in Gold-Mediated Catalysis. Organometallics 2011, 30, 5463–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schnee, G.; Bolley, A.; Hild, F.; Specklin, D.; Dagorne, S. Group 13 metal (Al, Ga, In) alkyls supported by N-heterocyclic carbenes for use in lactide ring-opening polymerization catalysis. Catal. Today 2017, 289, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, M.M.; Gill, A.M.; Yunpeng, L.; Yongxin, L.; Ganguly, R.; Falivene, L.; Garcia, F. Aryl-NHC-group 13 trimethyl complexes: Structural, stability and bonding insights. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mantina, M.; Chamberlin, A.C.; Valero, R.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Consistent vdW Radii for the Whole Main Group. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 5806–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arentsen, K.; Caddick, S.; Cloke, F.G.N. On the efficiency of two-coordinate palladium(0) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes in amination and Suzuki–Miyaura reactions of aryl chlorides. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9710–9715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Denk, M.K.; Rodezno, J.M.; Gupta, S.; Lough, A.J. Synthesis and reactivity of subvalent compounds: Part 11. Oxydation, hydrogenation and hydrolysis of stable diamino carbenes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617–618, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dagorne, S.; Fliedel, C. Organoaluminum Species in Homogeneous Polymerization Catalysis. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 41, 125–171. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dagorne, S.; Normand, M.; Kirillov, E.; Carpentier, J.-F. Gallium and indium complexes for the ring-opening polymerization of cyclic ethers, esters and carbonates. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 1869–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hild, F.; Haquette, P.; Brelot, L.; Dagorne, S. Synthesis and structural characterization of well-defined anionic aluminium alkoxide complexes supported by NON-type diamido ether tridentate ligands and their use for the controlled ROP of lactide. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Miyake, G.M.; John, M.G.; Falivene, L.; Caporaso, L.; Cavallo, L.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Lewis pair polymerization by classical and frustrated Lewis pairs: Acid, base and monomer scope and polymerization mechanism. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 9119–9134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Piedra-Arroni, E.; Amgoune, A.; Bourissou, D. Dual catalysis: New approaches for the polymerization of lactones and polar olefins. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 9024–9029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kolychev, E.; Theuergarten, E.; Tamm, M. N-heterocyclic carbenes in FLP chemistry. Top. Curr. Chem. 2013, 334, 121–155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Isomerization of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) adducts of group 13 metal complexes.
Scheme 1. Isomerization of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) adducts of group 13 metal complexes.
Inorganics 06 00023 sch001
Figure 1. Structures of NHCs IPr* and SItBu.
Figure 1. Structures of NHCs IPr* and SItBu.
Inorganics 06 00023 g001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of NHC adducts 14.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of NHC adducts 14.
Inorganics 06 00023 sch002
Figure 2. Molecular structure of adduct (IPr*)InMe3 (2, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): In(1)–C(1) = 2.330(5), C(1)–N(1) = 1.368(5), C(1)–N(2) = 1.355(6), C(2)–C(3) = 1.335(6).
Figure 2. Molecular structure of adduct (IPr*)InMe3 (2, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): In(1)–C(1) = 2.330(5), C(1)–N(1) = 1.368(5), C(1)–N(2) = 1.355(6), C(2)–C(3) = 1.335(6).
Inorganics 06 00023 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of adduct (SItBu)GaMe3 (3, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): Ga(1)–C(1) = 2.195(2), C(1)–N(1) = 1.351(2), C(2)–C(2)’ = 1.496(3).
Figure 3. Molecular structure of adduct (SItBu)GaMe3 (3, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): Ga(1)–C(1) = 2.195(2), C(1)–N(1) = 1.351(2), C(2)–C(2)’ = 1.496(3).
Inorganics 06 00023 g003
Figure 4. Molecular structure of adduct (SItBu)InMe3 (4, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): In(1)–C(1) = 2.399(2), C(1)–N(1) = 1.350(2), C(2)–C(2)’ = 1.500(4).
Figure 4. Molecular structure of adduct (SItBu)InMe3 (4, ORTEP view, the ellipsoids are at 50% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å): In(1)–C(1) = 2.399(2), C(1)–N(1) = 1.350(2), C(2)–C(2)’ = 1.500(4).
Inorganics 06 00023 g004
Scheme 3. Reaction of (SItBu)GaMe3 with H2.
Scheme 3. Reaction of (SItBu)GaMe3 with H2.
Inorganics 06 00023 sch003
Scheme 4. GaMe3-catalyzed hydrogenation of SItBu to afford imidazolidine 5 through Frustrated Lewis Pair (FLP) reactivity.
Scheme 4. GaMe3-catalyzed hydrogenation of SItBu to afford imidazolidine 5 through Frustrated Lewis Pair (FLP) reactivity.
Inorganics 06 00023 sch004
Scheme 5. ROP of lactide mediated by adduct (SItBu)GaMe3.
Scheme 5. ROP of lactide mediated by adduct (SItBu)GaMe3.
Inorganics 06 00023 sch005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolley, A.; Schnee, G.; Thévenin, L.; Jacques, B.; Dagorne, S. Sterically Bulky NHC Adducts of GaMe3 and InMe3 for H2 Activation and Lactide Polymerization. Inorganics 2018, 6, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6010023

AMA Style

Bolley A, Schnee G, Thévenin L, Jacques B, Dagorne S. Sterically Bulky NHC Adducts of GaMe3 and InMe3 for H2 Activation and Lactide Polymerization. Inorganics. 2018; 6(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bolley, Anaëlle, Gilles Schnee, Lucas Thévenin, Béatrice Jacques, and Samuel Dagorne. 2018. "Sterically Bulky NHC Adducts of GaMe3 and InMe3 for H2 Activation and Lactide Polymerization" Inorganics 6, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop