Next Article in Journal
Stability of Capsaicinoids and Antioxidants in Dry Hot Peppers under Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Incidence, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Toxin Genes Possession Screening of Staphylococcus aureus in Retail Chicken Livers and Gizzards
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Starters for Functional Yogurt
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) Oil: A Natural Preservative to Control Meat Spoilage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/foods4010034
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages

by
Domenico Meloni
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy
Foods 2015, 4(1), 34-50; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4010034
Submission received: 31 October 2014 / Revised: 19 February 2015 / Accepted: 27 February 2015 / Published: 12 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiology Safety of Meat Products)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The morphological, physiological and epidemiological features of L. monocytogenes, together with the severity of human listeriosis infections, make L. monocytogenes of particular concern for manufacturers of cold-stored “ready to eat” (RTE) foods. L. monocytogenes has been isolated from a wide variety of RTE foods and is responsible for several outbreaks associated with the consumption of RTE meat, poultry, dairy, fish and vegetable products. Although L. monocytogenes is among the most frequently-detected pathogens in dry fermented sausages, these products could be included in the category of RTE products in which the growth of L. monocytogenes is not favored and have rarely been implicated in listeriosis outbreaks. However, L. monocytogenes is highly difficult to control in fermented sausage processing environments due to its high tolerance to low pH and high salt concentration. In many Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages, an empirical application of the hurdle technology often occurs and the frequent detection of L. monocytogenes in these products at the end of ripening highlights the need for food business operators to properly apply hurdle technology and to control the contamination routes of L. monocytogenes in the processing plants. In the following, through an up-to-date review of (personal and un-) published data, the main aspects of the presence of L. monocytogenes in Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages will be discussed.

1. Introduction to the Main Features of Listeria monocytogenes

1.1. Taxonomy

The genus Listeria comprises fifteen species, i.e., L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, L. innocua, L. welshimeri, L. seeligeri, L. grayi, L. marthii, L. rocourtiae, L. leichmannii, L. weihenstephanensis, L. floridensis, L. aquatic, L. cornellensis, L. riparia and L. grandensis (Meloni, 2014 [1]).

1.2. Morphology of Listeria monocytogenes

Members of the genus Listeria are non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobic and small Gram-positive rods (0.5–4 µm in diameter and 0.5–2 µm in length). Peritrichous flagella give them a typical tumbling motility, occurring at 20–25 °C. Based on somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens, 13 serotypes of L. monocytogenes have been recognized. These are identified alphanumerically: 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4ab, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e and 7 (Meloni, 2014 [1]). Serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b and 1/2c are the most frequently isolated from food or the food production environment.

1.3. Physiology of Listeria monocytogenes

L. monocytogenes is catalase-positive, oxidase-negative and is able to survive between 0 and 45 °C. The optimum growth temperature is around 30–37 °C. L. monocytogenes can grow at pH ranges between 4.5 and 9.0 (optimum pH between 6 and 8) and is able to multiply in food matrices at water activity (aw) values of 0.92 and in NaCl concentrations of 12%, generally lethal to other microorganisms. L. monocytogenes is a ubiquitous organism, widely distributed in the environment: the principal reservoirs are soil, forage and water (Sauders and Wiedmann, 2007 [2]; Todd and Notermans, 2011 [3]; European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2014 [4]). Other reservoirs include healthy humans and animals (International Life Sciences Instistute (ILSI), 2005 [5]) or infected domestic and wild animals (EFSA, 2014 [4]). L. monocytogenes is a psychrotrophic bacterium, can multiply at low temperatures, both under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, adapt to disinfectants and adhere to various surfaces (Arevalos-Sánchez et al., 2012 [6]). L. monocytogenes is widespread in food processing facilities and has been isolated from different processing environments. Once introduced into the processing plants, it is able to survive and persist for a long time under adverse conditions (Farber and Peterkin, 1991 [7]; Gram et al., 2007 [8]; Gandhi and Chikindas, 2007 [9]). The biofilm forming ability is an important cause for such persistence (Cruz and Fletcher; 2012 [10]; Fonnesbech Vogel et al., 2001 [11]). In the pork meat supply chain, L. monocytogenes has been repeatedly isolated (Nesbakken et al., 1996 [12]), with an increase of contamination along the production line (Chasseignaux et al., 2002 [13]).

2. Listeria monocytogenes as a Foodborne Pathogen

2.1. Pathogenicity of Listeria monocytogenes

L. monocytogenes is the etiologic agent of listeriosis. Human cases of listeriosis are almost exclusively caused by L. monocytogenes. Very rare cases of infections are attributed to L. ivanovii and L. seeligeri. The difference in the pathogenic potential of L. monocytogenes strains has been demonstrated by means of in vivo bioassay and in vitro cell assay (Soni et al., 2014 [14]). Whereas some L. monocytogenes strains are naturally virulent, inflicting high morbidity and mortality, others are non-virulent and unable to infect the mammalian host (Liu et al., 2003 [15]; Velge and Roche, 2010 [16]). The discrimination between pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains is imperative to assess the possible significance of this microorganism from food safety and public health aspects (Jensen et al., 2008 [17]; Roberts et al., 2009 [18]). Rasmussen et al. (1995 [19]) and Wiedmann et al. (1997 [20]) demonstrated that molecular typing methods can also allow L. monocytogenes to divide into three evolutionary lineages characterized by different pathogenic potentials: Lineage I, strains associated with epidemic outbreaks of listeriosis (serotypes 1/2b, 3b, 4b, 4d and 4e); Lineage II, strains isolated from sporadic cases of listeriosis (serotypes 1/2a, 1/2c, 3a and 3c); Lineage III, strains rarely associated with cases of listeriosis (serotypes 4a and 4c) (Wiedmann, 2002 [21]). The lineage status of serotypes 4ab and 7 still remains unclear due to limited availability of such strains (World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), 2014 [22]). The majority of the infections caused by L. monocytogenes are thought to be food-borne, and infections most often affect the central nervous system, the bloodstream and the pregnant uterus. Two forms of listeriosis have been described in humans, and symptoms vary, ranging from febrile gastroenteritis in healthy people (Piana et al., 2005 [23]), to life-threatening invasive infections characterized by septicemia and meningoencephalitis in risk groups, such as young, old, pregnant and immune-compromised (YOPI) people (De Cesare et al., 2007 [24]).

2.2. Epidemiology of Listeriosis

Listeriosis is an important disease in Europe: it is the fourth most common zoonotic disease, and it has an annual incidence of 0.41 cases per 100,000 population, with the highest notification rates in Finland, Spain and Denmark (EFSA, 2014 [4]). In 2012, 1642 confirmed human cases were reported, mostly domestically acquired. A statistically significant increasing trend was observed over the period 2008–2012, with a +10.5% increase compared with 2011 (EFSA, 2014 [4]). As reported by previous authors, the highest notification rates were reported in persons aged 65 years and above (Denny and McLauchlin, 2008 [25]) and in persons aged below one year. Transmission during pregnancy was highlighted in 79% of the cases reported in newborns, with the spread of the infection to the fetus which is born severely ill. Listeriosis has the highest hospitalization rate cases of all zoonoses under EU surveillance: 91.6% of the cases with supplementary long-term sequelae. Listeriosis is the third leading cause of death in the EU after West Nile fever and trichinellosis and the first among food-borne pathogens, with an estimated case fatality rate of 17.8% (EFSA, 2014 [4]). A total of 198 deaths were reported in 2012, the highest number of fatal cases reported since 2006 (EFSA, 2014 [4]). The morphological, physiological and epidemiological features of L. monocytogenes, together with the severity of human listeriosis infections, make L. monocytogenes of particular concern for manufacturers of cold-stored “ready to eat” (RTE) foods (Romanova et al., 2002 [26]; Van Coillie et al., 2004 [27]; Shen et al., 2006 [28]). L. monocytogenes has been isolated from a wide variety of RTE foods and is responsible for several outbreaks associated with the consumption of RTE meat, poultry, dairy, fish and vegetable products (Aureli et al., 2000 [29]; Gillespie et al., 2006 [30]; Public Health Agency Canada (PHAC), 2009 [31]; U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS), 2010 [32]; Todd and Notermans, 2011 [3]). The EU legislation (Regulation (EC) No. 2073/2005 [33]) lays down food safety criteria for L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, and it is generally considered that concentrations of L. monocytogenes greater than 100 CFU/g are required to cause human disease in healthy populations. Qualitative results alone are not necessarily an indicator of public health risk. In RTE products intended for infants and for special medical purposes, L. monocytogenes must be absent in 25 g, while in RTE products in which the growth of L. monocytogenes is not favored (pH ≤ 4.4 or aw ≤ 0.92 or pH ≤ 5.0 and aw ≤ 0.94), L. monocytogenes must not be present at levels exceeding 100 CFU/g during the shelf-life. In RTE foods able to support its growth, L. monocytogenes must be absent in 25 g at the time of leaving the production plant. However, if the producer can demonstrate that the product will not exceed the limit of 100 CFU/g throughout its shelf-life, this criterion does not apply (European Commission, 2005 [33]). In 2012 the highest reported levels of non-compliance in RTE samples taken at processing were observed in fishery products (8.0%) and unspecified cheeses (3.4%). The highest proportions of food samples exceeding the legal safety limit, at retail, were observed in fishery products (0.5%) and fermented meat sausages (0.4%) (EFSA, 2014 [4]). Pork meat products, e.g., fermented sausages that are contaminated by L. monocytogenes at more than 100 CFU/g and that are to be consumed without further heat treatment, are considered to form a direct risk to human health.

3. Listeria monocytogenes in the Pork Meat Processing Industry

3.1. Swine Slaughterhouses

L. monocytogenes has been previously found in every stage along the pork processing industry (Thévenot et al., 2006 [34]; López et al., 2008 [35]), including swine slaughterhouses (Sammarco et al., 1997 [36]; Korsak et al., 1998 [37]). The sources of L. monocytogenes contamination during swine slaughtering are pig-related and environmental (Bonardi et al., 2002 [38]). L. monocytogenes is spread to the carcass mainly from the carrier animal: the pathogen has been occasionally isolated from feces and from the skin of healthy carriers with intestinal colonization (Autio et al., 2000 [39]).

3.1.1. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes

The prevalence in feces is generally comprised between 0% and 50% (Belœil et al., 2003 [40]). This wide range of prevalence is probably due to the emptying of the rectum before evisceration, an operation that usually helps to reduce the extent of dissemination and the consequent fecal contamination of carcasses (Kanuganti et al., 2002 [41]). The role of live animals as a source of processing environment contamination and, consequently, pork carcasses has been demonstrated: the most contaminated areas are usually represented by the area of stunning/hanging (Gobat and Jemmi, 1991 [42]; Nesbakken et al., 1994 [43]; Saide-Albornoz et al., 1995 [44]; Borch et al., 1996 [45]). Contamination may occur during the evisceration, because of the breaking of the intestine (Adesyiun et al., 1995 [46]), and reaches a prevalence of around 60%–65% (Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]; López et al., 2008 [35]), highlighting the profound influence of good hygiene practices and equipment cleanliness on carcass contamination (Bonardi et al., 2002 [38]; Meloni et al., 2013 [48]). Several authors (Buncic et al., 1991 [49]; Ripamonti et al., 2002 [50]; Kanuganti et al., 2002 [41]; Autio et al., 2003 [51]; Fabbi et al., 2005 [52]) correlated the contamination of equipment and consequently of the carcasses with the presence of the pathogen in other niches, such as the tongue (14%) and tonsils (7%–61%). This wide range of prevalence is probably due to differences in sampling techniques and/or methods of farm management.

3.1.2. Serotypes of Listeria monocytogenes

The most frequent serotypes found in carcasses and slaughterhouse environments are 1/2a, 1/2c (Hof and Rocourt, 1992 [53]; Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]; Meloni et al., 2013 [48]), while serotype 1/2b is generally found at low prevalence rates.

3.2. Meat Processing Plants

The level of L. monocytogenes contamination tends to increase along the pork supply chain (López et al., 2008 [35]). Raw meat is an important source of contamination of working environments and equipment. The most contaminated zones are the areas of the receipt of raw materials, the cells of refrigeration and the processing rooms (Chasseignaux et al., 2002 [13]).

3.2.1. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes

A higher prevalence is found in raw meat (45%–50%) compared to the muscles of freshly slaughtered pigs (0%–2%). Raw meat represents the primary source of contamination of final products by L. monocytogenes (Giovannacci et al., 1999 [54]; Kathariou, 2002 [55]; Kanuganti et al., 2002 [41]; Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]). In turn, due to the presence of favorable conditions for growth and multiplication during the processing stages of cooling and cutting, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in minced meat intended to be processed ranges between 16% and 50% (Jay, 1996 [56]; Chasseignaux et al., 2002 [13]). The level of contamination increases significantly up to 70%–100% during the processing stages of grinding and bagging (Nesbakken et al., 1996 [12]; Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]). Pork meat can also be cross-contaminated through contact with work surfaces and equipment. The level of contamination of the surfaces in contact and without contact with meat during processing ranges between 17%–50% and 11%–25%, respectively (Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]; Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]).

3.2.2. Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes

Once introduced into the plants, L. monocytogenes can persist over time in the processing environment (López et al., 2008 [35]), forming assemblages of surface-associated microbial cells enclosed in hydrated extracellular polymeric substances and growing in biofilms (Mafu et al., 1990 [58]; Gandhi and Chikindas, 2007 [9]; Meloni et al., 2012 [59]). In recent surveys carried out in fermented sausage processing plants located in Italy (Meloni et al., 2012 [59]; Meloni et al., 2014 [60]; Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]), the evaluation of the in vitro biofilm production of L. monocytogenes strains isolated from several surfaces in contact and without contact with meat showed a low short-time persistence (3–4 months) capacity and weak or moderate ability to form biofilm after 24 to 40 h of incubation. Isolates from serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b and 4b presented higher adherence when compared to isolates from serotype 1/2c (Meloni et al., 2014 [60]). Harborage sites, such as meat grinders, work tables or floor drains, can be critical sites for the processing plant environment (Tompkin, 2002 [61]). This could be due to the common presence of meat in these environmental niches: this would likely produce a common food-conditioning film, which might select for adhesion, growth and biofilm formation by isolates with a common prophage type (Verghese et al., 2011 [62]). Decontaminating surfaces in contact and without contact with meat is especially challenging, because, when entrapped in a biofilm, L. monocytogenes is afforded unusual protection against available disinfectants and treatments (Zhao et al., 2004 [63]). Without suitable sanitization procedures, the presence of L. monocytogenes increases the food safety risk (Samelis and Metaxopoulos, 1999 [64]; Meloni et al., 2014 [60]). Previous authors have reported that the recommended concentrations of commercial sanitizers are higher than required (Cruz et al., 2012 [10]). In a recent survey (Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]), the in vitro evaluation of the resistance to disinfectants (chlorine substances and quaternary ammonium compounds, both at 37% concentration) showed a reduction of L. monocytogenes growth after 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation in isolates from processing environments and finished products.

3.2.3. Serotypes of Listeria monocytogenes

Several studies have shown that strains of L. monocytogenes isolated from meat-processing environments belong mainly to serotypes 1/2c and 1/2a (Chasseignaux et al., 2002 [13]; Thévenot et al., 2006 [34]; Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]; Meloni et al., 2014 [60]).

4. Production of Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages

Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages are characterized by their relatively longer shelf-life and the exceptional hygienic background, which is brought about by the production of lactic acid in the fermentation process (pH < 4.5–5) and low water activity (<0.90) of the final product (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). In general, in the manufacturing of fermented sausages, meat and fat involves selection, chopping and mincing and mixing with curing ingredients, spices and authorized additives. At the end of the ripening and drying process, they come out as cured meat products (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). Traditionally, fermented sausages are made using lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Gram-positive catalase positive cocci, in particular coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) naturally present in the meat or with the inoculation of starter cultures at the chopping step. The mixture is then filled in natural or artificial casings, left to ferment and then dried. In the Mediterranean area, regional customs, environmental variations and family recipes have given rise to a wide range of fermented sausages, and it can be said that there are almost as many types of sausages as there are geographical regions or even manufacturers, although their production process always requires the combination of fermentation and dehydration (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). The very wide range of Mediterranean dry fermented sausages can be classified according to a range of criteria (Table 1), such as the acidity, the mincing size of meat and fat, the addition or absence of molds on the surface, the addition of ingredients and the diameter and type of casing used (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]).

4.1. Preliminary Stages

The meat used depends on eating habits, customs and the preferences prevailing in the geographical region where the fermented sausage is produced (Table 1). This is usually pork, sometimes mixed with beef (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). The fat should be firm, with a high melting point and a low content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, because this causes the fermented sausage to turn rancid more quickly (Frey, 1985 [66]). Mincing of the meat and fat is done at low temperatures (between −5 and 0 °C) to achieve a clean cut and to avoid the release of intramuscular fat from fatty meats, which could cause changes in the color and the drying process during ripening (Frey, 1985 [66]). Once the meat and fat have been comminuted, the starter culture (LAB) and the nitrate reducing CNS, curing salts, additives (nitrates, nitrites, glutamate) and other ingredients (sugars, aromatic herbs and spices) are added. The mixture, after refrigerated storage overnight, is placed in a kneader and stuffed into natural or synthetic casings (Greco et al., 2005 [67]; Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). The sausages are then ripened.

4.2. Fermentation and Ripening

After filling and the first warming up at 20–22 °C for 4–6 h, the fermentation stage for the manufacture of a standard dry fermented sausage can be summarized as follows: one to two days at 18–24 °C and 60% relative humidity (RH) and five days at 15 °C and 70% RH (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). After fermentation, ripening is carried out for five to 15 days in store rooms at 15 °C and 70%–75% RH. These conditions are maintained until the end of the ripening period, during which many flavor compounds develop (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). The normal pH of the majority of Mediterranean-style fermented sausages is close to 4.5/5.4, which has several beneficial effects on both the manufacturing process and the shelf-life (Greco et al., 2005 [67]; Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]). However, in some low acid fermented sausages (e.g., Soudjouk, Fuet), the final pH is close to 6.0/6.7. The suppression of the acid hurdle can compromise the safety of these products (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]; Jofré et al., 2009 [68]). At the end of ripening, the water activity of fermented sausages is close to 0.90, which inhibits bacterial growth. The water activity hurdle is strengthened with time and is largely responsible for the stability of fermented sausages (Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]).

4.3. Hurdle Technology in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages

L. monocytogenes is inhibited in fermented sausages by sequential steps: the “hurdle technology” concept includes several sequential hurdles, essential at different stages of the fermentation or ripening process (Barbuti and Parolari, 2002 [69]). Due to the sequence of these hurdles, pathogenic and spoilage bacteria are effectively inhibited in Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages, and the desired competitive flora (especially LAB) is selected (Leistner, 1995 [70]). These hurdles are essential in different steps of the fermentation or ripening process and lead to stable and safe final products (Leistner and Gould, 2002 [71]). In the early steps of the fermentation process, nitrite and salt added together in the form of nitrite-curing salts inhibit many bacteria in the initial product, such as pseudomonads and other Gram-negative oxidative organisms, which rapidly multiply and spoil uncured meats in the presence of oxygen (Leistner and Gould, 2002 [71]). Other bacteria, such as CNS, are able to multiply, use up the oxygen and cause the decrease of the redox potential of the product to decrease. CNS are also important, because of other biochemical-metabolic properties, such as lipolytic activity. Together with the nitrate reduction, these affect the quality (color and flavor) and the stability of the products (Selgas et al., 1994 [72]; Greco et al., 1999 [73]; Mazzette et al., 1999 [74]). This, in turn, favors the redox potential hurdle, which inhibits aerobic bacteria and promotes the selection of LAB (Leistner and Gould, 2002 [71]). This competitive microflora flourish by metabolizing the added sugars, producing lactic acid, bacteriocins and inhibitory metabolites, causing a decrease in pH value and an increase of the pH hurdle (Papa, et al., 1993 [75]; Torriani et al., 1994 [76]; Grazia et al., 1998 [77]; Leroy and de Vuyst, 1999 [78]; Hebert et al., 2000 [79]; Lucke, 2000 [80]). These properties explain why LAB are important as starter cultures in the manufacturing of dry fermented sausages (Greco et al., 2005 [67]). This is of particular importance for the microbial stability of quick-ripened fermented sausages, which are not greatly dried. In long-ripened fermented sausages, nitrite is depleted, and lactic acid bacteria slowly die. On the contrary, the redox potential and pH increase again (Leistner and Gould, 2002 [71]). Only the water activity hurdle is strengthened with time, and this hurdle is then largely responsible for the stability of long-ripened sausages (Leistner, 1987 [81]). This sequence of hurdles inhibits pathogenic and spoilage bacteria inside Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages, whereas undesirable mold growth on the surface of the sausages is inhibited by smoke or by the use of desirable mold starter cultures (Leistner and Gould, 2002 [71]).
Table
Table 1. Formulation (g/100 g) of typical Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages *.
Table 1. Formulation (g/100 g) of typical Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages *.
FormulationSalchichón/Saucisson (Spain/France) (1)Salami (Italy) (1)Salsiccia Sarda (Italy) (2)Fuet (Spain) (1)Chorizo (Spain/Portugal) (1)Lukanka (Bulgaria) (3)
Lean pork35/7045–8485–8760–7065–8025
Pork fat10–2514–255–830–4020–4020
Lean beef0–500–37-0–200–2055
Sugars0.2–0.50.3–0.70.80.1–0.40.6–0.8-
Curing salts2.0–2.41.8–2.532.0–2.41.8–2.12.24
Whole/ground black pepper0/0.2–0.2/0.40/0.2–0.1/0.140.250/0.2–0/0.3-0.30
White pepper-0–0.20.8-0–0.3-
Paprika----0/1.5–1.5/2.5-
Red pepper-----0.20
Cumin-----0.20
Garlic-0–0.20.15-0.2–1.2-
Sodium Glutamate0.25--0–0.15--
Powdered milk0–0.60–2.5--0–2.5-
Caseinate0–0.6--0–1.0--
Liquid smoke-----0.20
* Adapted and modified from Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]. Sources: (1) Ordóñez and de la Hoz, 2007 [65]; (2) Meloni et al., 2012 [59]; (3) Balev et al., 2005 [82].

5. Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages

5.1. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes

Fermented meat products may be contaminated by L. monocytogenes at several stages. The raw materials may be contaminated from the slaughterhouse environment, during the production process or by contact with contaminated unprocessed raw materials, unclean surfaces or people (Chasseignaux et al., 2002 [13]; Thévenot et al., 2006 [34]) in the post-processing stages (Colak et al., 2007 [83]). L. monocytogenes is among the most frequently-detected pathogens in dry fermented sausages, and several studies have documented the prevalence of the pathogen in fermented sausages (Table 2), reaching prevalence levels of up to 40%–45% (Cantoni et al., 1989 [84]; Cordano and Rocourt, 2001 [85]; Levine et al., 2001 [86]; Thévenot et al., 2005 [47]; De Cesare et al., 2007 [24]; Meloni et al., 2009 [87]; Meloni et al., 2012 [59]; Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]; Meloni et al., 2014 [60]; Doménech et al., 2015 [88]).

5.2. Levels of Contamination by Listeria monocytogenes

Fermented sausages contaminated with L. monocytogenes have rarely been implicated in critical listeriosis outbreaks (EFSA, 2014 [4]). Fermented sausages have moderate rates of consumption and serving sizes in many countries. The risk per serving is low (2.1 × 10−12), and the global number of annual cases per 100,000 people is only 0.0000055 (USDA/FSIS, 2010 [32]). Many Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages could be included in the category of RTE products in which the growth of L. monocytogenes is not favored, although there is great variability depending on the local traditions that influence fermentation and ripening (Hospital et al., 2012 [89]). Mostly in the manufacturing of traditional fermented sausages marketed locally or regionally, an empirical application of the hurdle technology often occurs. Some manufacturers tend to reduce the ripening period in order to increase profitability. As a matter of fact, the pH and aw of these products are often within the limits for growth of L. monocytogenes (Hospital et al., 2012 [89]). Insufficiently dried sausages may have water activity levels close to 0.92–0.94 (Meloni et al., 2014 [60]), and L. monocytogenes is able to survive during sausage fermentation, overcoming the hurdles encountered during the manufacturing process. In general, the contamination levels at the end of ripening are always lower than 100 CFU/g (Farber and Peterkin, 1991 [7]), because L. monocytogenes cannot compete with the prevailing lactic acid bacteria. Only without competitive microflora L. monocytogenes is able to multiply and reach high levels of contamination (higher than 1000 CFU/g), representing a major public health concern (McLauchlin et al., 2004 [90]; Thévenot et al., 2006 [34]).

5.3. Serotypes of Listeria monocytogenes

As already noted for raw meat and meat-processing environments, also in the Mediterranean-style sausages at the end of ripening, serotypes 1/2c, 1/2a and 1/2b are more often detected (Jay, 1996 [56]; Thévenot et al., 2006 [34]; Meloni et al., 2014 [60]; Mureddu et al., 2014 [57]), while serotype 4b is more rarely seen (Greenwood et al., 1991 [91]; Hayes et al., 1991 [92]). In Italy, serotype 1/2a is increasing its importance in the epidemiology of listeriosis. An increase of cases due to serotype 1/2a and a decline in cases due to serotype 4b have been reported by several authors (Gianfranceschi et al., 2009 [93]; Pontello et al., 2012 [94]). Despite the low prevalence rates of serotype 4b, previous surveys have shown that Lineage I strains of serotype 4b belonging to a clonal group (DUP-ID 1038) linked to several listeriosis outbreaks (De Cesare et al., 2007 [24]) were recently recovered in Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages produced in Italy (Meloni et al., 2009 [87]).
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in naturally-contaminated Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages *.
Table 2. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in naturally-contaminated Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausages *.
Type of Mediterranean-style dry fermented sausagePrevalence%Concentration datapH of the final productaw of the final product
Fermented sausage **10<3 CFU/g4.7–5.40.78–0.90
Italian salami **13.3Presence in 25 g4.8–5.20.85–0.90
Soudjouk **7Presence in 25 g4.9–6.7nd
Fermented sausage **3.25Presence in 25 gndnd
Fermented sausage **20Presence in 25 gndnd
Fermented sausage **19.05Presence in 25 gndnd
Fermented sausage **44Presence in 25 gndnd
Fermented sausage **20Presence in 25 gndnd
Salami **16.67Presence in 25 gndnd
Salsiccia **11.54Presence in 25 gndnd
Fermented sausage **20Presence in 25 gndnd
Salami **10Presence in 25 gndnd
Salami **16Presence in 25 gndnd
Salami **520 CFU/gndnd
Fermented sausage **10Presence in 25 gndnd
Salami **40Presence in 25 gndnd
Spanish-style sausage **3.70Presence in 25 gndnd
Salsiccia Sarda ***20Presence in 25 g5.320.90
Salsiccia Sarda ****8Presence in 25 g5.370.91
* Adapted and modified from Skandaminis and Nychas, 2007 [95]. nd: no data. Based on: ** Skandaminis and Nychas, 2007 [95]; *** Meloni et al., 2009 [87]; **** Meloni et al., 2014 [60].

6. Conclusions

The outcome of the previous paragraphs can be summarized from a safety standpoint as follows: Mediterranean-style fermented sausages may be contaminated with L. monocytogenes from various sources, including raw meat, slaughterhouse environments, production processes and post-processing conditions. In order to prevent these contamination sources, good manufacturing practices, correct sampling schemes, adequate cleaning and disinfection procedures and HACCP principles have to be applied. The use of starter cultures and the correct drying to lower the water activity can minimize the potential for growth of L. monocytogenes in Mediterranean-style fermented sausages. However, the frequent detection of L. monocytogenes at the end of ripening of these products highlights the need for food business operators to apply hurdle technology properly and to control the contamination routes of L. monocytogenes in meat processing plants.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meloni, D. Focusing on the main morphological and physiological characteristics of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. J. Vet. Sci. Res. 2014, 1, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sauders, B.D.; Wiedmann, M. Ecology of Listeria species and L. monocytogenes in the natural environment. In Listeria, listeriosis, and Food Safety; Ryser, E.T., Marth, E.H., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 21–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Todd, E.C.D.; Notermans, S. Surveillance of listeriosis and its causative pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2011, 22, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2012. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3547. [Google Scholar]
  5. International Life Sciences Instistute (ILSI) Research Foundation; Risk Science Institute. Achieving continuous improvement in reductions in foodborne listeriosis—A risk-based approach. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 1932–1994. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arevalos-Sánchez, M.; Regalado, C.; Martin, S.E.; Domínguez-Domínguez, J.; GarcíaAlmendárez, B.E. Effect of neutral electrolyzed water and nisin on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms and on listeriolys in O activity. Food Control 2012, 24, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farber, J.M.; Peterkin, P. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1991, 55, 476–571. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gram, L.; Bagge-Ravne, D.; Yin, N.Y.; Gymoese, P.; Fonnesbech Vogel, B. Influence of food soiling matrix on cleaning and disinfection efficiency on surface attached Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2007, 18, 1165–11671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gandhi, M.; Chikindas, M.L. Listeria: A foodborne pathogen that knows how to survive. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 113, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cruz, C.D.; Fletcher, G.C. Assessing manufacturers’ recommended concentrations of commercial sanitizers on inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2012, 26, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fonnesbech Vogel, B.; Huss, H.H.; Ojeniyi, B.; Ahrens, P.; Gram, L. Elucidation of Listeria monocytogenes contamination routes in cold-smoked salmon processing plants detected by DNA-based typing methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2586–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nesbakken, T.; Kapperud, G.; Caugant, D.A. Pathways of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in the meat processing industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 31, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chasseignaux, E.; Gerault, P.; Toquin, M.; Salvat, G.; Colin, P.; Ermel, G. Ecology of Listeria monocytogenes in the environment of raw poultry meat and raw pork meat processing plants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 210, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Soni, D.K.; Singh, M.; Vijai Singh, D.; Dubey, S.K. Virulence and genotypic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from vegetable and soil samples. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, D.; Ainsworth, A.J.; Austin, F.W.; Lawrence, M.L. Characterization of virulent and avirulent Listeria monocytogenes strains by PCR amplification of putative transcriptional regulator and internalin genes. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 52, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Velge, P.; Roche, S.M. Variability of Listeria monocytogenes virulence: A result of the evolution between saprophytism and virulence? Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 1799–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jensen, A.; Thomsen, L.E.; Jørgensen, R.L.; Larsen, M.H.; Roldgaard, B.B.; Christensen, B.B.; Vogel, B.F.; Gram, L.; Ingmer, H. Processing plant persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes appear to have a lower virulence potential than clinical strains in selected virulence models. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Roberts, A.J.; Williams, S.K.; Wiedmann, M.; Nightingale, K.K. Some Listeria monocytogenes outbreak strains demonstrate significantly reduced invasion, inlA transcript levels, and swarming motility in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5647–5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rasmussen, O.F.; Skouboe, P.; Dons, L.; Rosen, L.; Olsen, J.E. Listeria monocytogenes exists in at least three evolutionary lines: Evidence from flagellin, invasive associated protein and listeriolysin O gene. Microbiology 1995, 141, 2053–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wiedmann, M.; Bruce, J.K.; Keating, C.; Johnson, A.; McDonough, P.L.; Batt, C.A. Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphism suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential. Infect. Immun. 2997, 65, 2707–2716. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wiedmann, M. Molecular subtyping methods for Listeria monocytogenes. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. OIE Terrestrial Manual 2014, CHAPTER 2.9.7. Listeria monocytogenes. Available online: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.09.07_LISTERIA_MONO.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2015).
  23. Piana, A.; Are, R.; Orrù, M.; Saba, F.; Dettori, M.; Maida, I.; Sotgiu, G.; Rais, C.; Mura, M.S. Listeria monocytogenes meningoencephalitis: Molecular methods for diagnosis and for monitoring the response to chemotherapy. Ital. J. Public Health 2005, 2, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. De Cesare, A.; Mioni, R.; Manfreda, G. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh and fermented sausages and ribotyping of contaminating strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Denny, J.; McLauchlin, J. Human Listeria monocytogenes infections in Europe-an opportunity for improved European surveillance. Euro Surveill. 2008, 13, 8082. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Romanova, N.; Favrin, S.; Griffiths, M.W. Sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to sanitizers used in the meat processing industry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6405–6409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Van Coillie, E.; Werbrouck, H.; Heyndrickx, M.; Herman, L.; Rjipens, N. Prevalence and typing of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to Eat food products on the Belgian market. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 2480–2487. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Shen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cripe, J.; Conway, W.; Meng, J.; Hall, G.; Bhagwat, A.A. Isolation and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from ready-to-eat foods in Florida. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5073–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Aureli, P.; Fiorucci, G.C.; Caroli, D.; Marchiaro, G.; Novara, O.; Leone, L.; Salmaso, S. An outbreak of febrile gastroenteritis associated with corn contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. New Engl. J. Med. 2000, 342, 1236–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gillespie, I.A.; McLauchlin, J.; Grant, K.; Little, C.L.; Mithani, V.; Penman, C.; Lane, X.C.; Regan, M. Changing pattern of human listerios, England and Wales, 2001–2004. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1361–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Public Health Agency Canada. Lessons Learned: Public Health Agency of Canada’s Recall Response to the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak. Available online: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fs-sa/listeria/2008-lessons-lecons-eng.php (accessed on 4 February 2015).
  32. Interpretive Summary: Quantitative Assessment of Relative Risk to Public Health from Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes among Selected Categories of Ready-to-Eat Foods. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/foodscienceresearch/ucm197329.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2015).
  33. European Commission (EC). Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2005, L 338, 1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thévenot, D.; Delignette-Muller, M.L.; Christieans, S.; Leroy, S.; Kodjo, A.; Vernozy-Roland, C. Serological and molecular ecology of Listeria monocytogenes isolates collected from 13 French pork meat salting-curing plants and their products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 112, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. López, V.; Villator, D.; Oertiz, S.; López, P.; Navas, J.; Dávila, J.C.; Martínez-Suarez, J.V. Molecular tracking of Listeria monocytogenes in an Iberian pig abattoir and processing plant. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sammarco, M.L.; Ripabelli, C.; Ruberto, A.; Iannitto, G.; Grasso, G.M. Prevalence of Salmonellae, Listeriae, and Yersinae in the slaughterhouse environment and on work surfaces, equipment, and workers. J. Food Prot. 1997, 60, 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  37. Korsak, N.; Daube, G.; Ghafir, Y.; Chahed, A.; Jolly, S.; Vindevogel, H. An efficient sampling technique used to detect four foodborne pathogens on pork and beef carcasses in nine Belgian abattoirs. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Bonardi, S.; Brindani, F.; Maggi, E. Isolation of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp. from pigs at slaughter in Italy. Ann. Fac. Medic. Vet. Parma 2002, 22, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  39. Autio, T.; Sateri, T.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Rahkio, M.; Lunden, J.; Korkeala, H. Listeria monocytogenes contamination pattern in pig slaughterhouses. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 1438–1442. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Belœil, P.A.; Chauvin, C.; Toquin, M.T.; Fablet, C.; Le Nŏtre, Y.; Salvat, G. Listeria monocytogenes contamination of finishing pigs: An exploratory epidemiological survey in France. Vet. Res. 2003, 34, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kanuganti, S.R.; Wesley, I.V.; Reddy, P.G.; McKean, J.; Hurd, H.S. Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in pigs and pork. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1470–1474. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Gobat, P.F.; Jemmi, T. Epidemiological studies on Listeria spp. in slaughterhouses. Fleischwirtsch 1991, 1, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nesbakken, T.; Nerbrink, E.; Rotterud, O.J.; Borch, E. Reduction of Yersinia enterocolitica and Listeria spp. on pig carcasses by enclosure of the rectum during slaughter. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 23, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saide-Albornoz, J.J.; Knipe, C.L.; Murano, E.A.; Beran, G.W. Contamination of pork carcasses during slaughter, fabrication, and chilled storage. J. Food Prot. 1995, 58, 993–997. [Google Scholar]
  45. Borch, E.; Nesbakken, T.; Christensen, H. Hazard identification in swine slaughter with respect to foodborne bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 30, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Adesyiun, A.A.; Krishnan, C. Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3. Listeria monocytogenes O:4. and thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in slaughter pigs and carcasses in Trinidad. Food Microbiol. 1995, 12, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  47. Thévenot, D.; Delignette-Muller, M.L.; Christieans, S.; Vernozy-Roland, C. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in 13 dried sausage processing plants and their products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 102, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Meloni, D.; Piras, F.; Mureddu, A.; Fois, F.; Consolati, S.G.; Lamon, S.; Mazzette, R. Listeria monocytogenes in five Sardinian swine slaughterhouses: Prevalence, Serotype and Genotype Characterization. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 1863–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Buncic, S. The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in slaughtered animals, in meat, and in meat products in Yugoslavia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 12, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ripamonti, B.; Zecchini, A.; Colombo, F.; Stella, S.; Cantoni, C. Localizzazione di Listeria monocytogenes e Salmonella spp. nei macelli. Ing. Aliment. 2002, 18, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  51. Autio, T.; Keto-Timonen, R.; Lunden, J.; Bjorkroth, J.; Korkeala, H. Characterisation of persistent and sporadic Listeria monocytogenes strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 26, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fabbi, M.; Andreoli, G.; De Giuli, L.; Carretto, E. Listeria monocytogenes. In Trattato Sulle Infezioni e Tossinfezioni Alimentari; Rondanelli, E.G., Fabbi, M., Marone, P., Eds.; Selecta Medica: Pavia, Italy, 2005; pp. 357–389. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hof, H.; Rocourt, J. Is any strain isolated detected in food a health risk? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992, 16, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Giovannacci, I.; Ragimbeau, C.; Queguiner, S.; Salvat, G.; Vendeuvre, J.L.; Carlier, V.; Ermel, G. Listeria monocytogenes in pork slaughtering and cutting plants. Use of RAPD, PFGE and PCR-REA for tracing and molecular epidemiology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 53, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kathariou, S. Listeria monocytogenes virulence and pathogenicity, a food safety perspective. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1811–1829. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Jay, J. Prevalence of Listeria spp. in meat and poultry products. Food Control 1996, 7, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mureddu, A.; Mazza, R.; Fois, F.; Meloni, D.; Bacciu, R.; Piras, F.; Mazzette, R. Listeria monocytogenes persistence in ready-to-eat sausages and in processing plants. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2014, 3, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mafu, A.A.; Roy, D.; Goulet, J.; Magny, P. Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, glass, polypropylene and rubber surfaces after short contact times. J. Food Prot. 1990, 53, 742–746. [Google Scholar]
  59. Meloni, D.; Piras, F.; Mureddu, A.; Mazza, R.; Nucera, D.; Mazzette, R. Sources of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in traditional fermented sausages processing plants in Italy. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2012, 24, 214–222. [Google Scholar]
  60. Meloni, D.; Consolati, S.G.; Mazza, R.; Mureddu, A.; Fois, F.; Piras, F.; Mazzette, R. Presence and molecular characterization of the major serovars of Listeria monocytogenes in ten Sardinian fermented sausage processing plants. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tompkin, R.B. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in the food-processing environment. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 709–725. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Verghese, B.; Lok, M.; Wen, J.; Alessandria, V.; Chen, Y.; Kathariou, S.; Knabel, S. comK prophage junction fragments as markers for Listeria monocytogenes genotypes unique to individual meat and poultry processing plants and a model for rapid niche-specific adaptation, biofilm formation and persistence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3279–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhao, T.; Doyle, M.P.; Zhao, P. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in a biofilm by competitive-exclusion microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 3996–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Samelis, J.; Metaxopoulos, J. Incidence and principal sources of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes contamination in processed meats and a meat processing plant. Food Microbiol. 1999, 16, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ordóñez, J.A.; de la Hoz, L. Mediterranean products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat And Poultry; Toldrà, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2007; pp. 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  66. Frey, W. Fabricacion Fiable de Embutidos; Acribia, Ed.; Zaragoza, España, 1985; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  67. Greco, M.; Mazzette, R.; De Santis, E.P.L.; Corona, A.; Cosseddu, A.M. Evolution and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated during the ripening of Sardinian sausages. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jofré, A.; Aymerich, T.; Garriga, M. Improvement of the food safety of low acid fermented sausages by enterocins A and B and high pressure. Food Control 2009, 20, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Barbuti, S.; Parolari, G. Validation of manufacturing process to control pathogenic bacteria in typical dry fermented products. Meat Sci. 2002, 62, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Leistner, L. Principles and applications of hurdle technology. In New Methods of Food Preservation; Gould, G.W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  71. Leistner, L.; Gould, G.W. Hurdle Technologies: Combination Treatments for Food Stability, Safety and Quality; Kluwer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  72. Selgas, D.; Garcia de Fernando, G.; Ordonez, J.A. Lipolytic and proteolytic activity of micrococci isolated from dry fermented sausages. Fleischwirsch. Int. 1994, 2, 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  73. Greco, M.; Mazzette, R.; de Santis, E.P.L.; Bean, V.; Nieddu, M.P.; Pisanu, S. Micrococcaceae of “Sardinian sausage”: Note II. Characterization of isolated species and evolution during production. In Proceedings of the 53rd National Congress of Italian Society of Veterinary Science (SISVet), Montecatini terme (PT), Italy, 17–19 September 1999; pp. 331–332.
  74. Mazzette, R.; De Santis, E.P.L.; Greco, M.; Virdis, S.; Cosseddu, A.M. Micrococcaceae of ‘‘Sardinian sausage’’: Note I. Biochemical and metabolic characteristics. In Proceedings of the 53rd National Congress of Italian Society of Veterinary Science (SISVet), Montecatini terme (PT), Italy, 17–19 September 1999; pp. 329–330.
  75. Papa, F.; Giudici, P.; Grazia, L.; Torriani, S. Lactic-acid bacteria selection for better quality salami. Ind. Aliment. 1993, 32, 258–261. [Google Scholar]
  76. Torriani, S.; Di Bucchianico, R.; Patarini, F.; Zabeo, G.; Dell’aglio, F. Presenza e caratterizzazione biotecnologia di batteri lattici e Micrococcaceae negli insaccati abruzzesi. Ind. Conserve 1994, 69, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  77. Grazia, L.; Ranieri, S.; Zambonelli, C.; Chiavari, C. Action of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactobacilli on themolding of salami. Ind. Aliment. 1998, 37, 852–855. [Google Scholar]
  78. Leroy, F.; de Vuyst, L. Temperature and pH conditions that prevail during fermentation of sausages are optimal for production of the antilisterial bacteriocin sakacin K. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 115, 974–981. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hebert, E.M.; Raya, R.R.; Taillez, P.; de Giori, G.S. Characterization of natural isolates of Lactobacillus strains to be used as starter cultures in dairy fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 59, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Lucke, F.K. Utilisation of microbes to process and preserve meat. Meat Sci. 2000, 56, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Leistner, L. Shelf-stable products and intermediate moisture foods based on meat. In Water Activity: Theory and Applications to Food; Rockland, L.B., Beuchat, L.R., Institute of Food Technologists, Eds.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  82. Balev, D.; Vulkova, T.; Dragoev, S.; Zlatanov, M.; Bahtchevanska, S. A comparative study on the effect of some antioxidants on the lipid and pigment oxidation in dry-fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Colak, H.; Hampikyan, H.; Ulusoy, B.; Bingol, E.B. Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Turkish style fermented sausage (sucuk). Food Control 2007, 18, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cantoni, C.; Aubert, S.D.; Valenti, M.; Comi, G.; Aubert, S. Listeria spp. in cheese and dry sausages. Ind. Aliment. 1989, 28, 1068–1070. [Google Scholar]
  85. Cordano, A.M.; Rocourt, J. Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in food in Chile. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 70, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Levine, P.; Rose, B.; Green, S.; Ransom, G.; Hill, W. Pathogen testing of ready-to-eat meat and poultry products collected at federally inspected establishment in the United States, 1990 to 1999. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 1188–1193. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Meloni, D.; Galluzzo, P.; Mureddu, A.; Piras, F.; Griffiths, M.; Mazzette, R. Listeria monocytogenes in RTE foods marketed in Italy: Prevalence and automated EcoRI ribotyping of the isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 129, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Doménech, E.; Jimenez-Belenguer, A.; Amoros, J.A.; Ferrus, M.A.; Escriche, I. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella strains isolated in ready-to-eat foods in Eastern Spain. Food Control 2015, 47, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hospital, X.F.; Hierro, E.; Fernández, M. Survival of Listeria innocua in dry fermented sausages and changes in the typical microbiota and volatile profile as affected by the concentration of nitrate and nitrite. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. McLauchlin, J.; Mitchell, R.T.; Smerdon, W.J.; Jewell, K. Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis: A review of hazard characterization for use in microbiological risk assessment of foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 92, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Greenwood, M.; Roberts, H.D.; Burden, P. The occurrence of Listeria species in milk and dairy products: A national survey in England and Wales. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 12, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hayes, P.S.; Graves, L.M.; Ajello, G.W.; Swaminathan, B.; Weaver, R.E.; Wenger, J.D.; Schuchat, A.; Broome, C.V. Comparison of cold-enrichment and U.S. Department of Agriculture methods for isolating Listeria spp. from naturally contaminated foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 2109–2113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Gianfranceschi, M.V.; D’Ottavio, M.C.; Gattuso, A.; Bella, A.; Aureli, P. Distribution of serotypes and pulsotypes of Listeria monocytogenes from human, food and environmental isolates (Italy, 2002–2005). Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pontello, M.; Guaita, A.; Sala, G.; Cipolla, M.; Gattuso, A.; Sonnessa, M.; Gianfranceschi, M.V. Listeria monocytogenes serotypes in human infections (Italy, 2000–2010). Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2012, 48, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Skandaminis, P.; Nychas, J.E. Pathogens: Risks and control. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Toldrà, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2007; pp. 427–454. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meloni, D. Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages. Foods 2015, 4, 34-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4010034

AMA Style

Meloni D. Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages. Foods. 2015; 4(1):34-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4010034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meloni, Domenico. 2015. "Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages" Foods 4, no. 1: 34-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4010034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop