Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Propolis Prepared in Different Forms and in Different Solvents Useful for Finished Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Par Frying on Composition and Texture of Breaded and Battered Catfish
Previous Article in Journal
Cholesterol-Lowering Effects of Plant Sterols in One Serve of Wholegrain Wheat Breakfast Cereal Biscuits—A Randomised Crossover Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meat Quality Derived from High Inclusion of a Micro-Alga or Insect Meal as an Alternative Protein Source in Poultry Diets: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatile Profile of Raw Lamb Meat Stored at 4 ± 1 °C: The Potential of Specific Aldehyde Ratios as Indicators of Lamb Meat Quality

by
Ioannis Konstantinos Karabagias
Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
Foods 2018, 7(3), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030040
Submission received: 22 February 2018 / Revised: 13 March 2018 / Accepted: 14 March 2018 / Published: 16 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality and Safety of Meat Products)

Abstract

:
The objectives of the present study were: (a) to evaluate the aroma evolution of raw lamb packaged in multi-layer coating film and stored at 4 ± 1 °C, with respect to storage time and (b) to investigate whether specific aldehyde ratios could serve as markers of lamb meat freshness and degree of oxidation. Volatile compounds were determined using headspace solid phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Results showed that the most dominant volatiles were 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-hexanol, carbon disulfide and p-cymene. Volatile compound content was increased during storage time. However, statistically significant differences were recorded only for hexanal, heptanal, and nonanal (p < 0.05). Additionally, the evolution of aldehydes during storage recorded a positive Pearson’s correlation (r) (p < 0.05), whereas hexanal to nonanal, heptanal to nonanal, octanal to nonanal ratios, along with the sum of aldehydes to nonanal ratio, were positively correlated (r = 0.83–1.00) with the degree of oxidation (mg malonic dialdehyde per kg of lamb meat). A perfect Pearson’s correlation (r = 1) was obtained for the ratio hexanal to nonanal. Therefore, this ratio is proposed as an indicator of lamb meat freshness and overall quality.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Colour and flavour are the most important quality attributes consumers use to evaluate meat quality, and thus, acceptability and preference. Raw meat has little odour and only a mild serum-like taste, which is described as salty, metallic and “bloody” with a sweet aroma [1].
Sheep meat is a good source of polyunsaturated (linoleic (C18:2, n-6) and α-linolenic (C18:3, n-3)) and monounsaturated (oleic acid (C18:1 n-9)) fatty acids which have beneficial effects for human health. On the other hand, sheep meat contains significant amounts of saturated fatty acids with a prospective negative impact on human health, when consumed daily in high amounts [2].
Among different factors which influence the meat flavour, animal diet, especially its lipid content, is the most important, as the main source of volatile compounds [3]. The lipid fraction of meat, especially phospholipids, undergoes autoxidation, producing a large number of volatile compounds such as acids, aldehydes, ketones and alcohols and promoting the formation of other components such as nitrogen and sulphur-containing compounds [3]. In addition, lamb age, gender and weight may also affect the volatile profile of lamb meat [2]. What should not be forgotten is that biological processes such as rigor-mortis or post-mortem glycolytic fluxes might modify the volatile fraction of fresh meat [4].
The characteristic flavour of fresh meat, fermented meat products or dry cured ham has been reported to be a subtle balance between non-volatile compounds with taste properties and volatile compounds which interact with each other along with proteins and lipids [1,5].
Many methods have been developed to enhance the efficiency of the isolation of the volatiles in foods, such as vacuum distillation, simultaneous distillation and extraction, purge and trap or headspace techniques. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is an inexpensive, easy, rapid and efficient technique as compared to others [6,7,8,9,10].
With respect to volatile compound analysis, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is the technique that is most generally used. The literature involving research on volatile compounds in raw meat generally considers beef, duck, pork and poultry meat. However, very few publications deal with the volatile fraction originating from refrigerated storage and the large majority of the works deal with meat products and cooked meat using emerging technologies [1,7,11,12,13]. Surprisingly, there are only a few studies that have been carried out on the determination of volatile compounds in raw meat by using mild temperature analytical procedures [1,11,12,13,14,15] and/or the use of specific volatile compounds for the differentiation of meat origin [13]. In addition, the specific sense of smell that products of animal origin possess may provide useful information regarding the analysis of quality control [16,17].
Lamb meat is an important source of monetary profit for meat producers, exporters, local butcher’s shops and supermarkets in the region of Epirus and holds a special position in the food chain and casualties of local people.
Based on the aforementioned, the aims of the present study were: (a) to evaluate the volatile profile of raw lamb meat during storage under refrigeration and (b) to investigate whether specific aldehyde ratios could be correlated with shelf life and degree of oxidation test data [15], serving thus as markers of lamb meat freshness and overall quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Lamb Meat Samples, Packaging and Analysis Conditions

Leg of lamb meat (hind shank) samples in chunks, of dimensions ca. 2 × 2 × 2 cm, were provided from different chilled carcasses, 24 h post slaughter, by a local meat processing company (SVEKI S.A., Rodotopi, Ioannina, Greece). Lambs belonged to the Fries–Arta breed, which is a cross breed with high-yielding animals, farmed intensively in the lowlands. Lambs were 3–6 months old, male, with a slaughter weight of 12–13 kg. To avoid any source of contamination, lamb meat samples were transported to the laboratory in insulated polystyrene boxes on ice within 1 h of the chopping process. Prepared samples consisted of 150 ± 10 g in weight, were immediately placed in low density polyethylene/polyamide/low density polyethylene (LDPE/PA/LDPE) barrier pouches (6–7 chunks per pouch), 75 μm in thickness, having an oxygen permeability of 52.2 cm3 m−2 day−1 atm−1, at 75% relative humidity (RH), 23 °C and a water vapour permeability of 2.4 g m−2 day−1 at 100% RH, 23 °C. The experimental procedure was carried out on 36 samples: 2 bags × 2 replicates × 9 sampling days. Samples were stored at −18 °C in order to avoid any source of deterioration and prepared daily prior to headspace solid phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis (HS-SPME-GC/MS).

2.2. Determination of Lipid Oxidation

The degree of lipid oxidation in lamb meat samples was estimated using thiobarbituric acid assay (TBA) according to the methodology described in a previous work [18]. The value of TBA shows the degree of oxidation of the fats of a product. Measuring the degree of oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids is an indicator of the stability of a food’s fat in oxidation. In addition, the value of TBA shows the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) (mg/kg) in a fatty foodstuff since the latter compound originates from lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids. During the reaction, two molecules of TBA and one molecule of MDA react to give a red-coloured product which may be determined spectrophotometrically at 532 nm [18]. Absorbance measurements were accomplished using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Lambda 25, East Lyne, CT, USA).

2.3. Determination of Volatile Compounds

A divinyl benzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber 50/30 μm (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used to extract headspace volatile compounds from raw lamb meat. Prior to use, the fiber was conditioned following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Approximately, 2 g of lamb meat from different parts of the lamb legs were placed in a 20 mL crimp-cap vial (72 × 20 mm) equipped with PTFE/silicone septa. Then, 10 μL of an internal standard (4-methyl-2-pentanone, of initial concentration C = 640 ng/mL, Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany)) was added at the walls of the vial, and the vial was wrapped. It was vortexed for 5 min in order for the internal standard to be spread homogenously at the surface of raw lamb meat. The vial was then maintained at 50 °C in a water bath under stirring at 600 rpm during the entire extraction procedure, which was 30 min (15 min was the equilibration time and 15 min was the adsorption time). It should be stressed that when the heating of the raw meat product is somehow “mild” during analysis, the volatile profile can be considered as pure information, originating from raw meat. Volatile compounds analysis was carried out on day 1, day 5, and day 9 of storage. Each sample was run in duplicate (n = 2).

2.4. GC/MS Instrumentation and Method Conditions

A Hewlett-Packard, model 6890, gas chromatograph coupled to a Hewlett-Packard, model 5973, mass spectrometric detector (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) was used for the determination of lamb meat volatile compounds. A HP-INNOWAX (polyethylene glycol capillary column, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (30 m × 320 μm i.d., × 0.50 μm film thickness) was used, with helium as the carrier gas (purity 99.999%) at 1.4 mL/min flow rate. The injector and MS-transfer line were maintained both at 250 °C, respectively. For the analysis of lamb meat volatile compounds, oven temperature was held at 40 °C for 5 min, increased to 110 °C at 5 °C/min, and finally further increased to 240 °C at 8 °C/min (5 min hold). The fiber was maintained in the injector for 10 min. Electron impact mass spectra were recorded at 29–300 mass range with 3 scans/s. An electron ionization system was used with ionization energy of 70 eV. Regarding the detector, the temperature of MS quadrapole was held at 150 °C and that of MS source at 230 °C, respectively. Finally, a split ratio 2:1 was used.

2.5. Mass Spectral Data Processing

The identification of compounds was achieved by comparing the mass spectra of the chromatographic peaks with those of the Wiley 275 MS database. For semi-quantification, compound concentration was expressed as ng/g based on the ratio: peak area of analyte/peak area of internal standard (4-methyl-2-pentanone), considering the density (0.8 g/mL) of the internal standard. For validation purposes, volatile compounds having only ≥80% similarity with the Wiley mass spectral library were tentatively identified using GC-MS spectra. For the determination of linear retention indices, a mixture of n-alkanes (C6–C20) dissolved in n-hexane was employed. The mixture was supplied by Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). The calculation was carried out for components eluting between n-octane and n-eicosane using Equation (1).

2.6. Formatting of Mathematical Components

Kovats indices were calculated using Equation (1):
I = 100 × ( n + ( t r ( u n k o w n ) t r ( n ) t r ( N ) t r ( n ) ) )
where I = {\displaystyle I=}, I = Kovats retention index; n = {\displaystyle n=}, n = the number of carbon atoms in the smaller n-alkane; N = {\displaystyle N=}, N = the number of carbon atoms in the larger n-alkane; tr = {\displaystyle t_{r}=}, tr = the retention time.
Equation (1) is the main source for the calculation of Kovats index values, since the temperature was programmed.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The evolution of each volatile compound with respect to storage time was estimated using paired samples t-test analysis at the confidence level p ≤ 0.05. Correlations were obtained by Pearson’s bivariate correlation coefficient (r), at the confidence level p < 0.01. All statistical treatments were accomplished using the SPSS version 20.0 statistics (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software.

3. Results

Significant variations were observed in the volatile fraction of raw lamb meat during storage under refrigeration, including hexanal, heptanal, and nonanal, as specified by paired samples t-test (p ≤ 0.05). There was observed an increasing trend in all volatile compounds with respect to storage time, with the exception of octanal, toluene, and carbon disulfide, where fluctuations were recorded (Table 1). A typical gas chromatogram, pointing out the volatile compounds identified in the headspace of raw lamb meat is given in Figure 1.
Considerable variations in the volatile profile of raw unprocessed meat have been reported previously in numerous studies, involving the volatile profile of the raw meat of duck, goose, pork [1], beef [14,17] and lamb [2,15,19]. What is worth mentioning is that the collective results of breed comparisons suggested that genetic effects on lamb flavour were minor as compared with the effects of other factors such as age, sex, feeding/diet, oxidation, lipid content, myoglobin and pH [20]. In these factors mentioned previously in the literature, the role of air packaging technology, in terms of real market analysis, in the development of raw lamb’s meat aroma during storage should be also investigated. In real market analysis, consumers often purchase fresh, unprocessed meat from supermarkets or butcher’s shops, packaged or covered with paper roll, and store it under refrigeration prior to cooking, roasting or grilling. In that sense, the development of aroma in packaged lamb meat during storage at 4 ± 1 °C has not been yet investigated. The specific trend in lamb meat aroma evolution, along with the characteristics/role of each class compound determined in the present study, follows the text sequence.

3.1. Alcohols

Garcia et al. [21] and Barbieri et al. [22] indicated that 1-pentanol and 1-hexanol, were produced from the degradation of homologous aldehydes during lipid and amino acid oxidation. 1-Hexanol has a herbal and fatty odour, whereas 1-pentanol has a pleasant, sweet or fruity odour [20]. Respective odour thresholds are 2500 and 10,000 ng/g [23].
1-Octen-3-ol has been reported to be a common product of oxidation. Several precursors have been reported for 1-octen-3-ol, including linoleic and arachidonic acids [24]. In a recent study, 1-octen-3-ol was found at higher amounts in the meat of lambs fed with olive cake as compared to those fed with linseed [2]. It is characterized by a mushroom-like, grassy odour [20]. Its odour threshold has been reported to be 1 ng/g [23].
In accordance with other researchers, the alcohols identified in the present study have been previously reported in studies involving fresh meat of pork, duck, goose [1], beef [14,17], turkey [11], cattle [13] and lamb [2,15], respectively. We may then conclude that these alcohols are typical volatile markers of raw and unprocessed meat.

3.1.1. Aldehydes

Aldehydes, in general, are the main representatives of volatile compounds derived from ruminant animal’s meat [25]. According to Mottram [26], the straight chain aldehydes are compounds derived from the oxidation of fat. Hexanal, 2-heptenal, and 2,4-decadienal, (derived from linoleic acid), were associated with a diet rich in small amounts of plants [27,28]. Aldehydes act as important components in the transmission of certain flavors. The short-chain aldehydes tend to have a pungent or acidic odour, with the increasing of fatty acid chain length, and the degree of unsaturation.
Among aldehydes that are secondary products of fat oxidation [29], hexanal is a product resulting from the oxidation of unsaturated omega-6 fatty acids, having a low odour detection limit of 5.87 ng/g [30] and a paint-like, herbal, and rancid taste [31]. Heptanal has been reported to have a fatty odour, whereas octanal and nonanal a soapy or waxy odour [20,32]. The most abundant aldehydes identified in raw lamb meat were hexanal, followed by nonanal, heptanal, and octanal.
It should also be mentioned that the aforementioned aldehydes have been reported previously, adding to the volatile profile of lamb meat packaged under aerobic conditions [2], in agreement with present results.

3.1.2. Ketones

Ketones possess a low detection odour threshold [14]. The only ketone that was identified in raw lamb meat was 3-octanone. This volatile compound has been associated with the animal breed or the type of animal feeding background [13,14]. In addition, 3-octanone was found to be favorable to thermal processing of raw, trimmed of fat, cattle meat [13]. It is characterized by a fruity odour and an odour threshold ranging between 16–28 ng/g [33].

3.1.3. Hydrocarbons: Aliphatic and Benzene Derivatives

The hydrocarbons identified (aliphatic and aromatic) may originate from the animal food origin. These compounds are absorbed in fat tissue [34], as they are obtained from the degradation of lipids [21]. The aliphatic hydrocarbon 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane has been reported previously, aiding to the volatile profile of raw cattle meat [13,14] and lamb meat [2] having a characteristic odour [35].
On the other hand, there is a class of aromatic hydrocarbons that is characterized by a high degree of unsaturation and unusual stability. The most common member of this class is benzene (C6H6). When one of the positions on the ring has been substituted with another atom or group of atoms, the resulting compound is a mono-substituted benzene. The more common ones are toluene, o-xylene, and p-cymene. In the present study, these benzene derivatives contributed to the volatile pattern of raw lamb meat, recording a high rate of evolution, especially toluene and p-cymene, during storage (Table 1). This is also in agreement with the work of Insausti et al. [14]. However, their overall variation during storage was insignificant (p > 0.05) (Table 1). Some researchers have reported that aromatic hydrocarbons may be formed during the thermal decomposition of hydrocarbons, fats, and proteins [36]. However, in the present study these volatile compounds were found in raw, not thermally treated lamb meat. This is in agreement with the results of Insausti et al. [14], Saraiva et al. [17] and King et al. [37].
The presence/and or the combination of such mono-substituted benzenes, may play an important role in the overall flavour development of raw lamb meat, even though no individual compound of this group has a characteristic meat-like odour [38]. This is also in agreement with the results of Min et al. [39]. The typical odour of toluene and o-xylene is sweet, pungent or paint-like [38,40]. Toluene has an odour threshold of 2900 ng/g whereas that of o-xylene ranges between 620–1000 ng/g [40].
Insausti et al. [14] and Vasta et al. [13,15] documented the contribution of such compounds to the overall aroma development of raw beef, cattle and lamb meat, respectively.

3.1.4. Sulfur Compounds

Generally, sulfur compounds arise from sulfur-containing amino acids, cysteine and methionine, produced by proteolytic enzymes found in psychrotrophic bacteria (usually present in slaughterhouses). In the present study, carbon disulfide and benzothiazole were the only sulfur compounds determined. Carbon disulfide (CS2) may also be derived from dithio-carbamate fungicides used in agriculture [41]. Carbon disulfide has a pleasant, sweet or ether-like odour [42] and an odour threshold ranging between 1.6–420 ng/g [23]. In the study of Saraiva et al. [17] carbon disulfide contributed to the overall aroma of raw beef packaged under vacuum or modified atmosphere packaging during refrigerated storage.
On the other hand, benzothiazole, is an aromatic heterocyclic compound found commonly in nature [43] and has an odour threshold of 80 ng/g [23]. It has been reported to have an unpleasant, dirty, metallic or pyridine-like odour [44]. The thiazole derivatives have been identified among the volatile components of coffee, boiled meat, boiled potatoes, sterilized milk and beer. Thiazoles and thiazolines are mainly formed by Strecker degradation of sulfur amino acids (particularly cysteine). Lorenz et al. [45] found that sulfur compounds were the main components of meat extract. Various studies indicated that sulfur compounds were present at higher amounts in animals which grazed normally, as compared to animals fed with concentrated food. In that sense, Young et al. [28] indicated that dimethyl-sulfide and dimethyl-sulfone were detected in lamb fat and were associated with pasture activities. The sulfur compounds in meat arise during cooking by the reaction of hydrogen sulfide (formed by cleavage of the amino acid cysteine) with carbonyl compounds derived from the Maillard reaction [26,46]. Given that lamb meat was not thermally treated, carbon disulfide and benzothiazole could be considered as typical volatiles of raw lamb meat associated with pasture diets/activities.

3.1.5. Ethers

Vapors of certain ethers may be used as insecticides, miticides, and fumigants for soil [47]. The only ether that was identified in the volatile fraction of raw lamb meat was 15-crown ether, recording insignificant variations (p > 0.05) with respect to storage time. Its presence in the volatile pattern of unprocessed lamb meat may be attributed to environmental contamination.

4. Discussion

The volatile fraction of raw lamb meat was largely dominated by aldehydes, which are secondary products of oxidation and have been considered as markers of fat oxidation during storage time [48]. However, several volatiles that are not directly related to lamb meat flavour were also identified, namely benzothiazole, o-xylene, toluene, and crown ether-15. Such compounds may be considered as artifacts originating from environmental or external contamination and may not be considered as “natural” or unambiguous meat volatiles.
The evolution of aldehydes with respect to storage time recorded positive Pearson’s correlation (r) (p < 0.05). Respective r values for the groups hexanal–nonanal, heptanal–nonanal, and octanal–nonanal were 0.82, 0.44, and 0.72, through the 9 days of storage. However, the groups hexanal–nonanal and octanal–nonanal recorded excellent r values equal to 1 for the first 5 days of storage, in which raw lamb meat retained a fresh character based on microbiological (total viable counts < 7 log CFU/g) and sensory data (odour and taste) [18]. This was not the case for the group heptanal–nonanal, in which a perfect negative Pearson’s correlation was recorded (r = −1). The evolution of the aforementioned aldehydes through the 9 days of storage is given in Table 2.
Specific aldehyde ratios, namely hexanal to nonanal (Hex/Non), heptanal to nonanal (Hept/Non), octanal to nonanal (Oct/Non), and sum of hexanal, heptanal, and octanal to nonanal ratio (Hex + Hept + Oct/Non) (Table 2) recorded strong positive Pearson’s correlation with the degree of oxidation values (TBA test) expressed as mg malonic dialdehyde per kg of lamb meat (mg MDA/kg) throughout storage (1.4 mg MDA/kg on day 1, 2.8 mg MDA/kg on day 5, and 3.8 MDA/kg on day 9) [18]. Respective Pearson’s correlation values were r = 1.00, r = 0.87, r = 0.83, and r = 0.89 (Table 2). It should be stressed that the hexanal to nonanal ratio has been proposed as an indicator of the level of oxidation in olive oil [49], whereas variations in hexanal content with respect to storage time could serve as indicators of flavour deterioration in cooked pork [48]. In addition, octanal and nonanal (among other volatiles) have been proposed as indicators of raw beef quality stored under refrigeration [17].
Based on the aforementioned, the ratios Hex/Non, Oct/Non, and Hex + Hept + Oct/Non may be proposed as indicators of freshness and degree of oxidation, enhancing the quality of fresh lamb meat stored under refrigeration.

5. Conclusions

Results of the present study showed that the aroma of raw, unprocessed lamb meat is the outcome of the combination of specific volatile compounds. Storage time proved to be a parameter that significantly affected the evolution of hexanal, heptanal, and nonanal (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the evolution of hexanal, heptanal, octanal, and nonanal during storage under refrigeration, along with the Hex/Non, Oct/Non, and Hex + Hept + Oct/Non ratios could be proposed as overall indicators of lamb meat freshness and degree of oxidation, since they were strongly correlated with shelf life and TBA test data.
Special attention should be given to hexanal to nonanal ratio, which could serve as a unique marker of freshness and overall quality, since was perfectly correlated with the results of degree of oxidation (TBA test). Therefore, this ratio value—equal or lower than 2.45—is proposed as an indicator of lamb meat freshness and overall quality.
As an executive summary, the present study, unique in the literature, aids the fast quality control of raw lamb meat that enters the market by proposing specific aldehydes or aldehyde ratios as markers of raw lamb meat quality, in support of some previous studies on other food products [17,48,49].

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Michael G. Kontominas who provided access to the Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, and Anastasia Badeka for her technical assistance during preparation of samples for the GC/MS analysis. SVEKI SA is also acknowledged for the donation of lamb meat.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Soncin, S.; Chiesa, L.M.; Cantoni, C.; Biondi, P.A. Preliminary study of the volatile fraction in the raw meat of pork, duck and goose. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2007, 20, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gravador, R.S.; Serra, A.; Luciano, G.; Pennisi, P.; Vasta, V.; Mele, M.; Pauselli, M.; Priolo, A. Volatiles in raw and cooked meat from lambs fed olive cake and linseed. Animal 2015, 9, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Estevez, M.; Morcuende, D.; Ventanas, S.; Cava, R. Analysis of volatiles in meat from Iberian pigs and lean pigs after refrigeration and cooking by using SPME-GC-MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3429–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Acevedo, C.A.; Creixell, W.; Pavez-Barra, C.; Sánchez, E.; Albornoz, F.; Young, M.E. Modeling volatile organic compounds released by bovine fresh meat using an integration of solid phase microextraction and databases. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2557–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Montel, M.C.; Masson, F.; Talon, R. Bacterial role in flavour development. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, S111–S123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brunton, N.P.; Cronin, D.A.; Monahan, F.J. The effects of temperature and pressure on the performance of Carboxen/PDMS fibres during solid phase microextraction (SPME) of headsapace volatiles from cooked and raw turkey breast. Flavour Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moon, S.Y.; Cliff, M.A.; Li-Chan, E.C.Y. Odour-active components of simulated beef flavour analysed by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and-olfactometry. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pérez, R.A.; Rojo, M.D.; González, G.; De Lorenzo, C. Solid-phase microextraction for the determination of volatile compounds in the spoilage of raw ground beef. J. AOAC Int. 2008, 91, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Verzera, A.; Dima, G.; Tripodi, G.; Ziino, M.; Lanza, C.M.; Mazzaglia, A. Fast quantitative determination of aroma volatile constituents in melon fruits by headspace-solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Anal. Methods 2011, 4, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Condurso, C.; Tripodi, G.; Cincotta, F.; Lanza, C.M.; Mazzaglia, A.; Verzera, A. Quality assessment of Mediterranean shrimps during frozen storage. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2016, 28, 497–509. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahn, D.U.; Jo, C.; Olson, D.G. Volatile profiles of raw and cooked turkey thigh as affected by purge temperature and holding time before purge. J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nam, K.C.; Ahn, D.U. Combination of aerobic and vacuum packaging to control lipid oxidation and off-odor volatiles of irradiated raw turkey breast. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vasta, V.; Ratel, J.; Engel, E. Mass spectrometry analysis of volatile compounds in raw meat for the authentication of the feeding background of farm animals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4630–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Insausti, K.; Beriain, M.J.; Gorraiz, C.; Purroy, A. Volatile compounds of raw beef from 5 local Spanish cattle breeds stored under modified atmosphere. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1580–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vasta, V.; D’Alessandro, A.G.; Priolo, A.; Petrotos, K.; Martemucci, G. Volatile compound profile of ewe’s milk and meat of their suckling lambs in relation to pasture vs. indoor feeding system. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 105, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gąsior, R.; Wojtycza, K. Sense of smell and volatile aroma compounds and their role in the evaluation of the quality of products of animal origin—A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 16, 3–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saraiva, C.; Oliveira, I.; Silva, J.A.; Martins, C.; Ventanas, J.; García, C. Implementation of multivariate techniques for the selection of volatile compounds as indicators of sensory quality of raw beef. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 3887–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Karabagias, I.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M.G. Shelf life extension of lamb meat using thyme or oregano essential oils and modified atmosphere packaging. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Elmore, J.S.; Cooper, S.L.; Enser, M.; Mottram, D.S.; Sinclair, L.A.; Wilkinson, R.G.; Wood, J.D. Dietary manipulation of fatty acid composition in lamb meat and its effect on the volatile aroma compounds of grilled lamb. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Calkins, C.R.; Hodgen, J.M. A fresh look at meat flavor. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Garcia, C.; Berdague, J.L.; Antequera, T.; López-Bote, C. Volatile components of dry-cured Iberian ham. Food Chem. 1991, 41, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barbieri, G.; Bolzoni, L.; Parolari, G.; Virgili, R.; Buttini, R.; Careri, M.; Mangia, A. Flavour compounds of dry-cured ham. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 2389–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leffingwell and Associates. 2017. Available online: http://www.leffingwell.com/ (accessed on 10 October 2017).
  24. Wilson, R.A.; Katz, I. Review of literature on chicken flavour and report of isolation of several new chicken flavour components from aqueous cooked chicken broth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Larick, D.K.; Turner, B.E. Headspace volatiles and sensory characteristics of ground beef from forage- and grain-fed heifers. J. Food Sci. 1990, 54, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mottram, D.S. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food Chem. 1998, 62, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raes, K.; Balcaen, A.; Dirinck, P.; De Winne, A.; Claeys, E.; Demeyer, D.; De Smet, S. Meat quality, fatty acid composition and flavour analysis in Belgian retail beef. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1237–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Young, O.A.; Lane, G.A.; Priolo, A.; Fraser, K. Pastoral and species flavour in lambs raised on pasture, lucerne or maize. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Ruth, S.M.; Cheraghi, T.; Roozen, J.P. Lipid-derived off flavours in meat by-products: Effect of antioxidants and Maillard reactants. In Flavour of Meat, Meat Products and Seafood; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Blackie Academic & Professional: London, UK, 1998; p. 260. ISBN 978-0-7514-0484-5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ajuyah, A.O.; Fenton, T.W.; Hardin, R.T.; Sim, J.S. Measuring lipid oxidation volatiles in meats. J. Food Sci. 1993, 58, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brewer, M.S.; Vega, J.D. Detectable odor thresholds of selected lipid oxidation compounds in a meat model system. J. Food Sci. 1995, 60, 592–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Acree, T.; Aru, H. Flavornet. 1997. Available online: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/flavornet/chem.html (accessed on 30 October 2001).
  33. Wasowicz, E.; Kaminski, E.; Kollmannsberger, H.; Nitz, S.; Berger, G.; Drawert, F. Volatile components of sound and musty wheat grains. Chem. Mikrobiol. Technol. Lebensm. 1988, 11, 161–168. [Google Scholar]
  34. Meynerier, A.; Novelli, E.; Chizzolini, R.; Zanardi, E.; Gandemer, G. Volatile compounds of commercial Milano salami. Meat Sci. 1999, 51, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gorraiz, C.; Beriain, M.J.; Insausti, K. Effect of aging time on volatile compounds, odor, and flavor of cooked beef from Pirenaica and Friesian Bulls and Heifers. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cha, Y.J.; Back, H.H.; Hsieh, T.C.Y. Volatile components in flavor concentrates from crayfish processing waste. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 59, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. King, M.F.; Hamilton, B.L.; Mattews, M.A.; Rule, D.C.; Field, R.A. Isolation and identification of volatiles and condensable material in raw beef with supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 1974–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Molo, L.; Dekimpe, J.; Etlevant, P.; Addeo, F. Neutral volatile compounds in the raw milks from different species. J. Dairy Res. 1993, 60, 199–213. [Google Scholar]
  39. Min, D.B.S.; Ina, K.; Peterson, R.J.; Chang, S.S. Preliminary identification of volatile flavor compounds in the neutral fraction of roasted beef. J. Food Sci. 1979, 44, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2007. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh (accessed on 15 September 2007).
  41. Kontou, S.; Tsipi, D.; Tzia, C. Stability of the dithiocarbamate pesticide maneb in tomato homogenates during cold storage and thermal processing. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Holleman, A.F.; Wiberg, E.; Wiberg, N. Inorganic Chemistry; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; ISBN 100123526515. [Google Scholar]
  43. Le Bozec, L.; Moody, C.J. Naturally occurring nitrogen–sulfur compounds. The benzothiazole alkaloids. Aust. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lewis, R.J. Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th ed.; Van Nostrand Reinhold, Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 132. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lorenz, G.; Stern, D.J.; Flath, R.A.; Haddon, W.F.; Tillin, S.J.; Teranishi, R. Identification of sheep liver volatiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1983, 31, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hoffmann, T.; Schieberle, P.; Grosch, W. Model studies on the oxidative stability of odor-active thiols occurring in food flavors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wade, L.G. Ether; Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shahidi, F.; Pegg, R.C. Hexanal as an indicator of meat flavor deterioration. J. Food Lipids 1994, 1, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Robertson, G.L. Food Packaging and Shelf Life: A Practical Guide; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; p. 328. ISBN 9781420078442. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A typical gas chromatogram of raw lamb meat on day 5 of storage. Volatile compounds are numbered according to retention time given in Table 1. 1: carbon disulfide, 2: 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane, 3: toluene, 4: hexanal, 5: o-xylene, 6: heptanal, 7: 1-pentanol, 8: 3-octanone, 9: p-cymene, 10: octanal, 11: 1-hexanol, 12 :nonanal, 13: 1-octen-3-ol, 14: 1-heptanol, 15: 1-octanol, 16: benzothiazole, 17: 15-crown ether. IS: internal standard.
Figure 1. A typical gas chromatogram of raw lamb meat on day 5 of storage. Volatile compounds are numbered according to retention time given in Table 1. 1: carbon disulfide, 2: 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane, 3: toluene, 4: hexanal, 5: o-xylene, 6: heptanal, 7: 1-pentanol, 8: 3-octanone, 9: p-cymene, 10: octanal, 11: 1-hexanol, 12 :nonanal, 13: 1-octen-3-ol, 14: 1-heptanol, 15: 1-octanol, 16: benzothiazole, 17: 15-crown ether. IS: internal standard.
Foods 07 00040 g001
Table 1. Volatile compounds (average ± SD, ng/g) determined in raw lamb meat under air packaging with respect to storage time (days).
Table 1. Volatile compounds (average ± SD, ng/g) determined in raw lamb meat under air packaging with respect to storage time (days).
VOCsRTKIDay 1Day 5Day 9MSLM (%)MIp
Content (ng/g)Content (ng/g)Content (ng/g)
Alcohols
1-Pentanol11.77123311.77 ± 0.0124.73 ± 0.0156.77 ± 7.8383MS/KIp = 0.144
1-Hexanol13.77134227.70 ± 0.0171.29 ± 47.72236.92 ± 19.6283MS/KIp = 0.224
1-Octen-3-ol15.49145996.45 ± 0.01145.40 ± 156.77397.11 ± 25.7090MS/KIp = 0.151
1-Heptanol15.59146111.98 ± 0.0137.40 ± 4.9163.20 ± 8.6986MS/KIp = 0.121
1-Octanol17.29155723.55 ± 0.0230.90 ± 0.0157.27 ± 16.6591MS/KIp = 0.057
Aldehydes
Hexanal7.751105163.20 ± 0.01231.02 ± 92.34340.37 ± 165.8996MS/KIp = 0.040
Heptanal10.34118536.64 ± 0.0229.38 ± 0.7660.94 ± 6.7598MS/KIp = 0.043
Octanal12.60129921.02 ± 0.0125.83 ± 26.6756.59 ± 23.9191MS/KIp = 0.083
Nonanal14.61139380.98 ± 0.0494.84 ± 1.2097.52 ± 56.5291MS/KIp = 0.001
Ketones
3-Octanone11.87126623.44 ± 0.0236.39 ± 46.4666.98 ± 31.9195MS/KIp = 0.073
Heterocyclic
Benzothiazole23.27195417.24 ± 0.0224.53 ± 0.6645.52 ± 0.3091MS/KIp = 0.062
Benzene derivatives
Toluene6.571027381.95 ± 0.06221.99 ± 51.56735.19 ± 84.4091MS/KIp = 0.099
o-Xylene9.13116425.02 ± 0.1027.24 ± 30.3672.86 ± 9.4895MS/KIp = 0.114
p-Cymene12.18128029.35 ± 0.07103.31 ± 15.33181.68 ± 62.5495MS/KIp = 0.139
Hydrocarbons
2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane3.86<800171.27 ± 26.42226.12 ± 360.83435.97 ± 196.7783MSp = 0.074
Sulfur compounds
Carbon disulfide1.62<800825.58 ± 359.41125.31 ± 44.37376.24 ± 44.3490MSp = 0.168
Ethers
15-Crown ether30.2324325.11 ± 0.015.77 ± 2.8220.41 ± 14.9990MS/KIp = 0.158
VOCs: volatile compounds. RT: retention time. SD: standard deviation. Every value is the average of two determinations (n = 2). MSLM: mass spectral library match. MI: method of identification, with reference to mass spectra (MS) provided by Wiley 275 MS database and Kovats indices (KI). p: significance as assessed by paired samples t-test, at the confidence level ≤0.05.
Table 2. Aldehyde ratios and malonic dialdehyde development with respect to storage time (days).
Table 2. Aldehyde ratios and malonic dialdehyde development with respect to storage time (days).
Aldehyde Ratio-MDADay 1Day 5Day 9Pearson’s (r)
Hexanal–Nonanal2.022.443.491.00
Heptanal–Nonanal0.450.310.620.87
Octanal–Nonanal0.260.270.580.83
Sum of (Hexanal, Heptanal, Octanal)–Nonanal2.733.024.700.89
MDA (mg/kg)1.42.83.8
Aldehyde ratios were obtained by dividing average values of each aldehyde presented in Table 1. MDA: malonic dialdehyde. Pearson’s correlation coefficient r was considered at the confidence level p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karabagias, I.K. Volatile Profile of Raw Lamb Meat Stored at 4 ± 1 °C: The Potential of Specific Aldehyde Ratios as Indicators of Lamb Meat Quality. Foods 2018, 7, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030040

AMA Style

Karabagias IK. Volatile Profile of Raw Lamb Meat Stored at 4 ± 1 °C: The Potential of Specific Aldehyde Ratios as Indicators of Lamb Meat Quality. Foods. 2018; 7(3):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karabagias, Ioannis Konstantinos. 2018. "Volatile Profile of Raw Lamb Meat Stored at 4 ± 1 °C: The Potential of Specific Aldehyde Ratios as Indicators of Lamb Meat Quality" Foods 7, no. 3: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop