Next Article in Journal
Influence of Iodine Feeding on Microbiological and Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Biogenic Amines Content in a Raw Ewes’ Milk Cheese
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Food Processing and Extraction Technologies of High-Added Value Compounds from Plant Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Grape Cryo-Maceration Process at Different Temperatures

1
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Cinthia; Monte S. Angelo Complex, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, Portici, 80045 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food Science and Nutrition Section, University of Perugia, via S. Costanzo 1, 06126 Perugia, Italy
4
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
5
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2018, 7(7), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7070107
Submission received: 3 June 2018 / Revised: 29 June 2018 / Accepted: 3 July 2018 / Published: 6 July 2018

Abstract

:
This research aimed to determine the effects of cryo-maceration at different temperatures on polyphenol content during the winemaking process of Chardonnay wine. Samples of Chardonnay grapes were subjected to rapid cooling processes by direct injection of liquid CO2 to obtain final temperatures of 10.0, 8.0, 6.0 and 4.0 °C and yield different batches of grape mash. Subsequently, each batch underwent the winemaking process to produce four different wines. The wines obtained were characterized by chemical analyses. We observed higher extraction of polyphenolic compounds with low-temperature cold maceration, particularly when the temperature was reduced from 10.0 to 6.0 °C. Conversely, when the temperature was reduced below 6.0 °C, the increase in polyphenol content in wine was negligible, whereas CO2 consumption increased. Furthermore, a numerical simulation was performed to determine the pipe length, L0, after which the temperature was constant. This condition is very important because it guarantees that after the length L0, the thermodynamic exchange between liquid CO2 and is complete, eliminating the possibility of liquid CO2 pockets in the cyclone.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Studies of extraction methods and their conditions play a central role not only in the exhaustive recovery of bioactive compounds from natural matrices, but also in the preservation of these compounds in their native form by avoiding alterations [1,2]. In the last few years, inert gas has been widely used in winemaking processes to cool and protect musts from oxidation, with satisfactory results [3,4,5]. The cryo-maceration of grapes by the direct contact of mashed grapes with a cryogenic gas is a promising technical approach to winemaking [6,7]. This process allows the must to rapidly reach temperatures below 10.0 °C, thereby preventing an increase in the yeast population, alcoholic fermentation, and the loss of volatile aromatic compounds [8]. Pre-fermentative white grape cryo-maceration is normally used to enhance the varietal character of white wine by extraction of the skin flavour, and the grape skin contact is conducted in controlled conditions (time and temperature). Different tests reported in the literature have aimed at maintaining the pre-fermentation phase to prevent the initiation of undesired spontaneous fermentation rather than understanding the effects of cooling [9,10]. Cold pre-fermentation maceration is realized by submitting the mashed grapes to temperatures below 18.0–20.0 °C [11,12]. This process can be performed by controlling the temperatures of refrigerated containers, by flowing mashed grapes through tubular heat exchangers, or by direct contact of cryogenic gas with the mashed grapes. Previous experimental data have indicated that cold pre-fermentation maceration between 10 and 20 h and control of the temperature in an oxygen-poor atmosphere positively affects the extraction of aromatic and phenolic substances to increase the varietal aroma [13]. A considerable amount of gas evolves during the direct contact between the must and cryogen, which reduces the diffusion of atmospheric oxygen into the liquid phase, and thus decreases the oxidation of phenolic substances, aromatic compounds and particularly anthocyanins, which are responsible for the colour of red wines [14,15]. Grape skins, pulp and seeds contain a large amount of different phenolic compounds that are partially extracted during winemaking [16,17]. These phenolic compounds, together with those arising from chemical reactions occurring during the winemaking and/or ageing processes, affect the colour, taste and structure of wines [18,19]. Wine polyphenols have been studied extensively in relation to their protective effects against cardiovascular and degenerative diseases [20], certain types of cancers [21] and chronic inflammation and thrombosis [22]. Their chemical structures enable them to act as antioxidants to scavenge and neutralize free radicals [23]. Cryo-maceration equipment for fast cooling of mashed grapes by means of a cryogenic gas (liquid carbon dioxide, CO2) is already available on the market. A dosed quantity of liquid CO2 is directly injected in-line from a tank into the mashed grape flow, which is cooled to the pre-set desired temperature. The CO2 consumption depends on both the mass quantity to be cooled and the final temperature. Therefore, liquid CO2 consumption increases with increasing temperature difference (DT) in the process. Parenti et al. (2004) [24] reported that cold maceration with cryogenic gas increased the total polyphenol content of typical Tuscan red grapes of Chianti (Sangiovese), with cryo-maceration temperatures ranging from +5.0 to −5.0 °C. However, this process causes phase changes; in fact, at 0 °C and –5.0 °C, the aqueous substance of the mashed grape turned to ice, with consequent alterations in its physical-chemical properties. However, many producers use cryo-maceration processes with cryo-maceration temperatures as low as possible to avoid ice formation. For these types of plants, however, during the thermodynamic exchange between liquid CO2 and must, liquid CO2 pockets may form, which will cause ice formation in the cyclone (a condition to avoid). Therefore, this work evaluate cryo-maceration temperatures that inhibit (or almost inhibit) the fermentation process in an attempt to avoid phase variations that could affect the physicochemical characteristics of the mashed grape. Samples of Chardonnay grapes were analysed at different cryo-maceration temperatures (10.0, 8.0, 6.0, 4.0 °C) to evaluate the polyphenol content extracted without phase changes (ice formation) under the same operating conditions. Finally, for the considered process, a numerical simulation was performed to evaluate the pipe length L0 after which the temperature distribution is uniform and the thermodynamic exchange between liquid CO2 and must is complete, thereby avoiding liquid CO2 pockets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Instrumentation and Reagents

Polyphenols were analysed with an HP 8452 Agilent UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The reagents p-(dimethylamino)cinnamaldehyde (p-DMACA), gallic acid and (+)-catechin were purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), and the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All other employed reagents were of analytical grade.
Standards (−)-Epicatechin, (+)-catechin, (−)-epigallocatechin, and (−)-epigallocatechin gallate were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The Chardonnay grapes used in this study were from Campania (Benevento, Italy). The grapes had the following characteristics: 10.5 ± 0.5 (v/v) sugar; 20.5 ± 0.5 °Brix; pH = 3.45 ± 0.05; total acidity 6.5 ± 0.5 (g/L). These values were considered optimal for the production of a good tasting Chardonnay wine. The grapes were harvested manually. After destalking and mashing, the mashed grapes were cooled rapidly, in only a few seconds, to the pre-set cryo-maceration temperature in specialized equipment using direct in-line liquid CO2 injection. The equipment consisted of a mash-destemmer machine whose final stage was connected to a thermally insulated AISI 304 steel principal inlet pipe with an internal diameter of 30 cm and a thickness of 3 mm; the mashed grapes flowed through this pipe. The liquid CO2 system consisted of a liquid CO2 tank (20 × 105 Pa), liquid CO2 injectors, pipelines and nozzles (thermally insulated) for the direct injection of liquid CO2 into the mashed grapes. A cyclone was used for solid-gas separation. A control panel allowed the regulation of process data (i.e., levels, pressure and temperature) via a mono-type volumetric pump. A schematic representation of the equipment is shown in Figure 1. The equipment is generally used for cooling grapes at a rate of 20–25 ton/h, with an adjustable temperature range from 10.0 to 25.0 °C. Using the equipment shown in Figure 1, the mashed grape batches underwent the cryo-maceration process at temperatures of 10.0, 8.0, 6.0 and 4.0 °C, with a standard deviation of ± 0.5 °C.

2.2. HPLC Analysis of Polyphenols

Chromatographic analyses were performed on an Hewlett-Packard (HP) 1100 Series HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an autosampler, quaternary pump, column heater, diode array detector, HP1046A fluorescence detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and HP ChemStation for data collection and treatment. Normal-phase separations of the proanthocyanidin oligomers were performed under the conditions previously described by Hammerstone et al. (1999) [25]. Briefly, separations of the procyanidin oligomers were performed on a 5-m Luna silica column (250 × 4.6 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at 37 °C using an injection volume of 10 L. The ternary mobile phase consisted of (A) dichloromethane, (B) methanol, and (C) acetic acid and water (0.01:1 v/v). Separations were achieved by a series of linear gradients of B in A with constant 4% C at a flow rate of 1 mL/min as follows: elution starting with 14% B in A; 14–28.4% B in A, 0–30 min; 28.4–50% B in A, 30–60 min; 50–86% B in A, 60–65 min; 65–70 min isocratic. Data were collected using both the UV detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), at 280 nm and the fluorescence detector (FLD) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), at an excitation wavelength of 276 nm and an emission wavelength of 316 nm. Other FLD conditions included a photomultiplier tube gain of 12, frequency of 110 Hz, and response time of 2 s.

2.3. Numerical Simulation

A numerical model was used to simulate the thermo-fluid-dynamic process that occurred inside the delivery pipeline between the liquid CO2 and the mashed grapes. The aim was to evaluate the L0 pipe length at which the temperature distribution became constant and the thermodynamic exchange between liquid CO2 and must was complete. Such an evaluation is important because after the pipe length L0, no liquid CO2 pockets should reach the cyclone. Liquid CO2 pockets that enter the cyclone will result in ice formation. The CFX 5.0 Ansys program code was used. Because of the pipe’s geometry, it was assumed to be symmetrical, and therefore only half of the delivery pipe was modelled, with approximately 4.0 × 105 elements (Figure 2).
The characteristics of the fluids used as inputs were as follows: liquid CO2 with a pressure of 20 × 105 Pa and a temperature of −20.0 °C and grape juice as an aqueous solution at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 37.0 °C. We performed the numerical simulation considering a final temperature equal to 10.0, 8.0, 6.0, or 4.0 °C, and we evaluated the pipe length after which the final temperature became uniform.
The injection of radial liquid CO2 in the inlet section was also considered, in addition to a pipeline length of 8 m and constant diameter of 30 cm. Moreover, for simplicity, the pipe was considered to be linear. In the inlet section, the two fluids (mashed grape and liquid CO2) are not yet mixed.
As soon as the two fluids leave the inlet section, the mixing immediately begins, together with the change in phase between the gaseous CO2 and dry CO2 and the thermal exchange among the three species. To ensure fast cooling of the mashed grapes and to minimize the loss of organoleptic substances and natural aromas in the final product, the thermal exchange must be completed in the shortest time possible [26,27]. The physical properties of the two fluids are shown in Table 1. The discretization of the numerical model with a mesh is shown in Figure 2, and the boundary conditions considered are listed in Table 2. Table 3 reports the values of the characteristic parameters for the 4 considered cases.

2.4. Winemaking Process

Samples of the cooled mashed grape treated at each temperature were collected to fill 3 stainless steel tanks of 100-L capacity and then stored under an inert and controlled environment of carbon dioxide gas. In total, 12 stainless steel tanks were used to store the batches of mashed Chardonnay grapes treated at 10.0, 8.0, 6.0 and 4.0 °C. The temperature was maintained constant for all tanks and monitored during the entire experimentation period. The grapes were subjected to skin maceration immediately after crushing at the pre-set temperature for 24 h. Potassium meta-bisulfite (120 mg/kg grape) was added and mixed with the grapes prior to pressing. All musts obtained after pressing were adjusted to pH 3.4 ± 0.1, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and inoculated with 2% (w/v) of a pure culture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (cerevisiae A) yeast strain. In all cases, fermentation started in the tanks and was maintained at 22.0 °C. Thus, the only difference among the treatments was the cryo-maceration temperature. Temperature and density were measured daily. Manual punching down was conducted twice a day by “pigéage” (a classic French wine-making method where the grapes are stomped down in open vats by foot). The wines were then strained off, and the mash was pressed. Malolactic fermentation was then induced by inoculation with Oenococcus oeni lactic acid bacteria. When the second fermentation was finished, 20 mg/L sulfur dioxide were added to the wines. The wines were allowed to stay for 4 weeks and then analyzed.

2.5. Physical-Chemical Analysis

Ethanol was quantified using the method of Crowell & Ough (1979) [28]. Reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, volatile acidity, pH and tartaric acids were determined using European Economic Community (EEC) official methods (1990) [29]. In this work, the polyphenolic content of the wines obtained was analysed by HPLC according to a method described by Hammerstone et al. (1999) [25].

2.6. Organic Acid Analysis

An isocratic high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was used for the separation and quantitative analysis of the major organic acids of wines such as citric, tartaric, malic, lactic, and acetic acids. An Aminex HPX87-H strong cation-exchange resin column eluted with dilute sulfuric acid was used with UV monitoring at 210 nm. The sample was prepared by membrane filtration and removal of phenolic compounds with disposable reverse phase cartridges. The use of mobile phases with different pH values allowed the separation of compounds such as malic acid and fructose that normally coelute [30]. The results of the HPLC analysis were compared with data in the literature.

2.7. Total Phenolics Assay

This analytical procedure was performed as reported by Ivanova et al. (2011) [31]. For the determination of total phenols, the Folin-Ciocalteu method was used [32]. After appropriate dilution of samples, 1.00 mL of solution was transferred to a 10-mL volumetric flask, and 5 mL of distilled water was added. Then, 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was added, and the resultant solution was mixed. After 3 min, 1.5 mL of Na2CO3 solution (5 g/L) was added, and after mixing, the volumetric flask was filled to the mark with distilled water. The solution was incubated at 50.0 °C for 16 min and then cooled at room temperature; the absorbance of this solution was read at a wavelength of 765 nm using distilled water as a blank. The total phenol concentration was expressed as gallic acid equivalents per 1 g of fresh sample after the construction of a calibration curve in the range of 0–100 mg/L. All samples were analysed in triplicate.

2.8. Total Catechins Assay

The p-(dimethylamino)cinnamaldehyde (p-DMACA) method was used for the determination of total catechins expressed as catechin equivalents (mg/L). The reagent was prepared in methanol and HCl (4:1 v/v) and contained 1% (w/v) DMACA. After appropriate dilution of the sample, 1 mL of solution was transferred to a 10-mL volumetric flask, and three drops of glycerine and 5 mL of p-DMACA reagent were added. The volumetric flask was filled to the mark with methanol, and the solution was allowed to stand for 7 min. The absorbance was then read at a wavelength of 640 nm using methanol as a blank [33]. All samples were analysed in triplicate.

2.9. Colour Intensity, Hue, Colour Composition and Brilliance of the Wines

The colour intensity of the wine was determined by measuring its absorbance. The colour intensity mainly depends on the anthocyanin content and structure [34]. By using a 2-mm optical path, the absorbance values were determined as reported by Ivanova et al. (2010) [33].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The data for each variable were analysed using multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical significance of each factor under consideration was calculated using the LSD test. The data were statistically analysed using Statgraphic Plus 5.1 software (Statpoint Technologies, Warrenton, VA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Numerical Simulation

The results of the numerical simulation show that there is a zone with relevant temperature gradients and another zone in which these gradients are negligible (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
In particular, it was hypothesized that after the CO2 input, a turbulent regime was established in the mixture and after a length of pipe L0, measured starting from the input section, the temperature was uniform and equal to the pre-set temperature (Tout put), taking into account that CO2 was inputted at 20 atm and therefore the mixed fluid mass underwent an acceleration (increasing the final flow velocity). In other words, by injecting liquid CO2, it cooled the liquid with which it came in contact, and generated a pipe length, L0, with non-uniform internal liquid temperature and with pockets of liquid CO2. The CO2 pockets vanished when the internal heat exchange inside the pipeline was exhausted, that is, after the pipe length L0. The value of L0 must be less than Lt (total length of the pipe), so as to avoid pockets of liquid CO2 arriving in the cyclone, which is located after pipe length Lt (Figure 4). The recirculation that appears in the first part of the pipeline due to the asymmetrical geometry of this part and the strong kinetics of the gaseous CO2, enhance the mixing phenomenon among the species involved, and consequently, thermal exchange. In all cases examined, the extinction length of this phenomenon, that is, the distance at which the temperature is approximately uniform, was approximately 2 m (Figure 5). The extinction length value is very important for avoiding the passage of liquid CO2 pockets into the cyclone and ice formation. Therefore, we must be certain that the liquid CO2 has completed thermal exchange before the cyclone zone, after the L0 length. In this case, L0 is approximately 2 m. Generally, it is necessary to verify that the total length of the pipeline Lt is greater than L0. In this case, the results guarantee that there are no CO2 liquid pockets in the cyclone, which can provoke ice formation.

3.2. Winemaking Process

The alcohol content in all of the produced wines ranged between 11.40 and 11.45 (v/v), and the titratable acidity values ranged between 6.00 and 6.09 g/L, expressed as tartaric acid. The volatile acidity values were approximately 0.30 ± 0.02 g/L, expressed as acetic acid. The pH values ranged between 3.19 and 3.26. These values are characteristic of young white table wines and are proof of a good winemaking process.

3.3. Chemical Pnalysis

The chemical analyses of wines made from grapes subjected to the cryo-maceration process at different temperatures did not reveal any significant differences in density and pH (Table 4).
By contrast, the polyphenol content increased as temperature decreased from 10.0 to 6.0 °C. However, a further decrease in temperature from 6.0 to 4.0 °C did not significantly increase the polyphenol content. All wines had high phenol values because of the low cryo-maceration temperatures used. In fact, a deeper yellow colour (OD 420) was a direct consequence of the higher phenolic content of the wines. Although catechins were not sensitive to the different cryo-maceration temperatures, one of their monomers, (−) epicatechin, exhibited higher levels at lower temperatures [35]. The means and standard deviations of the phenolic parameters showed significant differences when a lower cryo-maceration temperature was used. Furthermore, the use of lower cryo-maceration temperatures had a positive effect on the total concentration of pro-anthocyanins, which contribute to wine colour. Alcohol, reducing sugars and volatile acidity were not significantly different. The same considerations can be applied to the levels of total acidity and pH values. The maceration process was carried out in such a way that during this phase there were no fermentation processes. On the other hand, all wine producers know that fermentative processes do not take place at a temperature of 10.0 °C. Therefore, in all wineries, maceration is usually carried out with T at around 10.0 °C using different methods of cooling. Accordingly, the conventional fermentation used as a comparison test was wine obtained with a maceration temperature of 10.0 °C. In particular, the evaluation of the increase in polyphenols was only carried out according to the Folin-Ciocalteu assay. From these results, it could be deduced that by lowering the temperature from 10.0 to 8.0, and to 6.0 °C, a significant increase in polyphenols was obtained. However, a decrease from 6.0 to 4.0 °C did not provide further significant increases in polyphenols, and also implied a strong increase in energy costs. Moreover, these data show that the different cryo-maceration temperatures did not affect the fermentative activity of the yeasts. On the other hand, it is known that measurement of antioxidant activity using in vitro assays has become very popular over recent decades. Indeed, the measurement concentrations of total phenolics, flavonoids, and other compound (sub)classes using UV/Vis spectrophotometry enable rapid screening. For a complete characterization of the bioactive compounds, chromatographic techniques and/or in vitro and in vivo assays can be used, as recently reported by Granato et al. (2018) [36].

3.4. Wine Phenolic Composition and Colour Variables of the Wines

The concentrations of total phenolic compounds increase with decreasing cryo-maceration temperature down to 6.0 °C; further decreases in temperature to 4.0 °C have a negligible effect [37]. White wines have different phenolic compositions that are characteristic for each variety. However, the concentrations of the phenolic families in wines depend not only on the grape variety but also on additional factors, such as the climatic conditions, the enological practices and the storage conditions [38,39]. During bottle ageing of wine, modifications of the polyphenolic composition occur as a result of different transformations, such as oxidation processes, condensation and polymerization reactions. These reactions include direct reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols or reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols through ethyl bridges [40,41], whereby stable pigments are formed that stabilize the wine colour. All of these reactions are related to changes in colour and sensorial characteristics, such as the flavour, bitterness and astringency of the final wine. The analysed wines contained 233.5−440.4 mg/L total phenols, and the content of catechins was 18.3–18.9 mg/L; the (+)-catechin content was 3.39–3.43 mg/L; (−)-epicatechin was 20.5–22.9 mg/L; proanthocyanidins were 38–51 mg/L. The obtained results for the analysed wines were also in agreement with the data published by EEC methods (EEC regulation 2676/90 1990) [29].

3.5. Organic Acid Analysis

The statistical evaluation showed that the HPLC method for identifying and quantitating the major carboxylic acids in the wines was highly reproducible and reliable. The results of the HPLC analyses were compared with the data obtained by standard methods reported in the literature. The calculated content of carboxylic acids was in very good agreement with the values obtained by other standard methods, and the precision of the quantitation was comparable to those of traditional methods.

3.6. Polyphenol Analysis

The polyphenolic fingerprint might be a useful tool for the classification of wines [42,43,44]. In this work, the polyphenolic content of the wines was analysed by HPLC according to a method described by Hammerstone et al. (1999) [25]. Several authors have shown that principal component analysis of the polyphenolic fraction can separate wines according to variety. A variety of techniques have been used to analyse phenolic composition. HPLC is mainly used for this purpose, occasionally connected to an MS, but other techniques, such as NIR and UV/Vis, have also been successfully used [45,46]. Many authors have studied phenolic compounds in grapes and wines using HPLC as the most suitable analytical technique [47,48,49]. However, this technique is not available in wineries for routine analyses, whereas spectrophotometric methods, which are more affordable due to their lower costs, lower reagent consumption and rapid measurements, can be used for wine and grape analyses to follow the changes in polyphenol content during grape ripening and the winemaking process. The most commonly used methods are for the determination of the total phenolics and catechins [32].

3.7. Sensory Analysis

A sensory analysis using a consumer test was also conducted on the final product obtained to determine whether differences were highlighted in the perception and pleasantness of the products that had been processed (10.0, 8.0, 6.0, 4.0 °C). The consumer test showed that a group of regular consumers (not experts) of Chardonnay wine (16 individuals: 9 men and 7 women) whowere offered anonymous samples of the product successfully identified the quality of the samples, which they tasted using the scores described in the report table. For this number of tasters, the number of correct answers (i.e., the number of individuals correctly identifying which of the three samples was different) must be p < 0.10 for the results to be significant at the 90% confidence level (i.e., an error factor equal to 0.05). The tasters answered correctly for each parameter in an interval scale (0 best–100 worst) and responses were averaged. The average values were taken for statistical treatment and are reported in Table 5. Based on these results, we can conclude that the product obtained with the cryomaceration temperature near to 6.0 °C obtained the best result in the consumer test. However, the data obtained in the preference tests suggest that the samples obtained with a cryomaceration temperature of 6.0°C corresponded to the best taste (Table 5).

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed for all data reported in Table 4 and Table 5 Mean values in different columns designated by different letters are significantly different by Fisher’s Test at p ≤ 0.005. Mean values in different columns designated by the same letter are not significantly different by Fisher’s Test at p ≥ 0.005.

4. Conclusions

In this work, different cooling temperatures were used during the cryo-maceration of Chardonnay grapes (10.0, 8.0, 6.0, 4.0 °C). The polyphenol quantity extracted at the different cryo-maceration temperatures was considered without phase changes that could affect the chemical and physical characteristics of the mashed grapes. In particular, lowering the cryo-maceration-temperature from 10.0 to 6.0 °C resulted in an increase in polyphenols. Below a temperature of 6.0 °C, further increases in polyphenols were negligible, whereas liquid CO2 consumption increased notably. For Chardonnay wine, lowering the cryo-maceration temperature below 6.0 °C did not significantly increase polyphenol content but increased liquid CO2 consumption. This increased consumption of liquid CO2 can not only increase the cost of wine production but also have a greater environmental impact. Although polyphenols have antioxidant properties, they can promote the browning of wine. Finally, a numerical simulation was used to evaluate the L0 pipe length after which the temperature is constant to ensure that there is no ice formation in the cyclone.

Author Contributions

D.N. and A.F. conceived and designed the experiments; G.S. performed the experiments; A.P. and F.V. analyzed the data; D.M. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; M.G. wrote the paper.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) to Daniele Naviglio through the program FFABR 2017 (CUP E65D17000430001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Formato, A.; Gallo, M.; Ianniello, D.; Montesano, D.; Naviglio, D. Supercritical fluid extraction of α-and β-acids from hops compared to cyclically pressurized solid–liquid extraction. J. Supercrit. Fluid. 2013, 84, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Montesano, D.; Gennari, O.; Seccia, S.; Albrizio, S. A simple and selective analytical procedure for the extraction and quantification of lutein from tomato by-products by HPLC–DAD. Food Anal. Methods 2012, 5, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marais, J. Effect of different wine-making techniques on the composition and quality of Pinotage wine. I. Low-temperature skin contact prior to fermentation. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 24, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Piombino, P.; Genovese, A.; Gambuti, A.; La Morte, S.A.; Lisanti, M.T.; Moio, L. Effects of off-vine bunches shading and cryo-maceration on free and glycosilated flavours of Malvasia delle Lipari wine. Int. J. Food. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carillo, M.; Formato, A.; Fabiani, A.; Scaglione, G.; Pucillo, G.P. An inertizing and cooling process for grapes cryo-maceration. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 14, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kechagia, D.; Paraskevopoulos, Y.; Symeou, E.; Galiotou-Panayotou, M.; Kotseridis, Y. Influence of prefermentative treatments to the major volatile compounds of Assyrtiko wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4555–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Effect of wine micro-oxygenation treatment and storage period on colour-related phenolics, volatile composition and sensory characteristics. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Albanese, D.; Attanasio, G.; Cinquanta, L.; Di Matteo, M. Volatile compounds in red wines processed on an industrial scale by short pre-fermentative cold maceration. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 3266–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gómez-Míguez, M.J.; González-Miret, M.L.; Hernanz, D.; Fernández, M.Á.; Vicario, I.M.; Heredia, F.J. Effects of prefermentative skin contact conditions on colour and phenolic content of white wines. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bavčar, D.; Baša Česnik, H.; Čuš, F.; Košmerl, T. The influence of skin contact during alcoholic fermentation on the aroma composition of Ribolla Gialla and Malvasia Istriana Vitis vinifera (L.) grape wines. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peinado, R.A.; Moreno, J.; Bueno, J.E.; Moreno, J.A.; Mauricio, J.C. Comparative study of aromatic compounds in two young white wines subjected to pre-fermentative cryo-maceration. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saerens, S.M.G.; Delvaux, F.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Van Dijck, P.; Thevelein, J.M.; Delvaux, F.R. Parameters affecting ethyl ester production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aronson, J.; Ebeler, S.E. Effect of polyphenol compounds on the headspace volatility of flavors. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2004, 55, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Salinas, M.R.; Garijo, J.; Pardo, F.; Zalacain, A.; Alonso, G.L. Influence of prefermentative maceration temperature on the colour and the phenolic and volatile composition of rosé wines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Langlois, J.; Ballester, J.; Campo, E.; Dacremont, C.; Peyron, D. Combining Olfactory and Gustatory Clues in the Judgment of Aging Potential of Red Wine by Wine Professionals. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jung, D.M.; Ebeler, S.E. Headspace solid-phase microextraction method for the study of the volatility of selected flavor compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jones, P.R.; Gawel, R.; Francis, I.L.; Waters, E.J. The influence of interactions between major white wine components on the aroma, flavour and texture of model white wine. Food Qual. Prefer. 2008, 19, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Escudero, A.; Campo, E.; Fariña, L.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Analytical characterization of the aroma of five premium red wines. Insights into the role of odor families and the concept of fruitiness of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4501–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bueno, M.; Culleré, L.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Chemical and sensory characterization of oxidative behavior in different wines. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1423–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hertog, M.G.L.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Hollman, P.C.H.; Katan, M.G.; Kromhout, D. Dietary antioxidant flavonoid and risk of coronary heart disease: The Zutphen elderly study. Lancet 1993, 324, 1007–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tomera, J.F. Current knowledge of the health benefits and disadvantages of wine consumption. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kinsella, J.E.; Frankel, E.N.; German, J.B.; Kanner, J. Possible mechanisms for the protective role of antioxidants in wine and plant foods. Food Technol. 1993, 47, 467–469. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kanner, J.; Frankel, E.N.; Granit, R.; German, B.; Kinsella, J.E. Natural antioxidants in grapes and wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parenti, A.; Spugnoli, P.; Calamai, L.; Ferrari, S.; Gori, C. Effects of cold maceration on red wine quality from Tuscan Sangiovese grape. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004, 218, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hammerstone, J.F.; Lazarus, S.A.; Mitchell, A.E.; Rucker, R.; Schmitz, H.H. Identification of procyanidins in cocoa and chocolate using High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. González-Barreiro, C.; Rial-Otero, R.; Cancho-Grande, B.; Simal-Gándara, J. Wine aroma compounds in grapes: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 202–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Esti, M.; Tamborra, P. Influence of winemaking techniques on aroma precursors. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 563, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crowell, E.A.; Ough, C.S. A modified procedure for alcohol determination by dichromate oxidation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1979, 30, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  29. Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 of 17 September 1990 determining Community Methods for the Analysis of Wines. Available online: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6528497d-1ece-4355-ab08-c73b3242f7ee/language-en (accessed on 17 September 1990).
  30. Schneider, A.; Gerbi, V.; Redoglia, M. Rapid HPLC method for separation and determination of major organic acids in grape musts and wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1987, 38, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ivanova, V.; Vojnoski, B.; Stefova, M. Effect of the winemaking practices and aging on phenolic content of Smederevka and Chardonnay wines. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 1512–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Slinkard, K.; Singleton, V.L. Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1997, 28, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ivanova, V.; Stefova, M.; Chinnici, F. Determination of the polyphenol contents in macedonian grapes and wines by standardized spectrophotometric methods. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010, 75, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boulton, R. The copigmentation of anthocyanins and its role in the color of red wine: a critical review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2001, 52, 67–87. [Google Scholar]
  35. Baiano, A.; Terracone, C.; Gambacorta, G.; La Notte, E. Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Primitivo Wine: Comparison among Winemaking Technologies. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Granato, D.; Shahidi, F.; Wrolstad, R.; Kilmartin, P.; Melton, L.D.; Hidalgo, F.J.; Miyashita, K.; Camp, J.V.; Alasalvar, C.; Ismail, A.B.; et al. Antioxidant activity, total phenolics and flavonoids contents: Should we ban in vitro screening methods? Food Chem. 2018, 264, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Gordillo, B.; Hernanz, D.; Escudero-Gilete, M.L.; González-Miret, M.L.; Heredia, F.J. Effect of the time of cold maceration on the evolution of phenolic compounds and colour of Syrah wines elaborated in warm climate. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1886–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rezaei, J.H.; Reynolds, A.G. Characterization of Niagara peninsula Cabernet franc wines by sensory analysis. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  39. Santiago Hurtado, J.I.; Lopez De Lerma, N.; Moreno, J.; Peinado, R.A. Effect of thermal treatment and oak chips on the volatile composition of Pedro Ximenez sweet wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  40. Walker, T.; Morris, J.; Threlfall, R.; Main, G. Analysis of wine components in Cynthiana and Syrah wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1543–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Le Berre, E.; Atanosova, B.; Langlois, D.; Etievant, P.; Thomas-Danguin, T. Impact of ethanol on the perception of wine odorant mixtures. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galego, L.R.; Jockusch, S.; Da Silva, J.P. Polyphenol and volatile profiles of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit extracts and liquors. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shu, Y.S.; Wen, G.J.; Yu, P.Z. Comparison of aromatic and phenolic compounds in cherry wines with different cherry cultivars by HS-SPME-GC-MS and HPLC. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 100–106. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moreno, M.; Arribas, S.A.; Bermejo, E.; Zapardiel, A.; Chicharro, M. Analysis of polyphenols in white wine by CZE with amperometric detection using carbon nanotube-modified electrodes. Electrophoresis 2011, 32, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Casavecchia, C.; Magnisi, R.; La Pera, L.; Maisano, R.; Dugo, G. Classification of Sicilian red wines from autochthonous and allochthonous cultivars according to anthocyanin pattern. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2007, 58, 286–290. [Google Scholar]
  46. Edelmann, A.; Diewok, J.; Schuster, K.C.; Lendl, B. Rapid method for the discrimination of red wine cultivars based on Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy of phenolic wine extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1139–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. De Quirós, R.B.A.; López-Hernández, J.; Ferraces-Sasais, P.; Lage-Yusty, M.A. Analysis of non-anthocyanin phenolic compounds in wine samples using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 1262–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Hernanz, D.; Recamales, Á.F.; González-Miret, M.L.; Gómez-Míguez, M.J.; Vicario, I.M.; Heredia, F.J. Phenolic composition of white wines with a prefermentative maceration at experimental and industrial scale. J. Food Eng. 2007, 80, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Coletta, A.; Trani, A.; Faccia, M.; Punzi, R.; Dipalmo, T.; Crupi, P.; Antonacci, D.; Gambacorta, G. Influence of viticultural practices and winemaking technologies on phenolic composition and sensory characteristics of Negroamaro red wines. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 2215–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Grape cryomaceration equipment with liquid CO2.
Figure 1. Grape cryomaceration equipment with liquid CO2.
Foods 07 00107 g001
Figure 2. Finite volume model of the pipeline.
Figure 2. Finite volume model of the pipeline.
Foods 07 00107 g002
Figure 3. Temperature distribution in the median section of the pipeline and flow pattern-case 4, Table 3.
Figure 3. Temperature distribution in the median section of the pipeline and flow pattern-case 4, Table 3.
Foods 07 00107 g003
Figure 4. Turbulent kinetic energy distribution in the median section of the pipeline.
Figure 4. Turbulent kinetic energy distribution in the median section of the pipeline.
Foods 07 00107 g004
Figure 5. Temperature distribution of the mashed grape along the axis of the pipeline, for each case reported in the above Table 3 (Tin (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape; Tout (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; DT = Tin − Tout).
Figure 5. Temperature distribution of the mashed grape along the axis of the pipeline, for each case reported in the above Table 3 (Tin (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape; Tout (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; DT = Tin − Tout).
Foods 07 00107 g005
Table 1. Characteristics of the fluids.
Table 1. Characteristics of the fluids.
PropertiesGrape JuiceLiquid CO2
Density (kg/m3)13001032
Cp (J/kg K)27102050
Thermal conductibility (w/m K)0.610.132
Viscosity (kg/m s)0.0010030.00014
Table 2. Boundary conditions considered.
Table 2. Boundary conditions considered.
ConditionsGrape JuiceLiquid CO2Mixture
InletV = 1 m/s
T = 310 K
V = 20 m/s
T = 253 K
OutletT = TfinalT = Tfinalp = 1 atm
Walladiabaticadiabaticadiabatic
Table 3. Values of the characteristics parameters for the four considered cases Tout (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; Tin (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape.
Table 3. Values of the characteristics parameters for the four considered cases Tout (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; Tin (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape.
CaseTin
(°C)
Tout
(°C)
DT
(°C)
Mashed Grapes
(kg/s)
13710.027.0 ± 0.55.6
28.029.0 ± 0.5
36.031.0 ± 0.5
44.033.0 ± 0.5
Table 4. Analytical determinations performed on wines made from grapes subjected to cryomaceration processes at different final temperatures (Chardonnay grape).
Table 4. Analytical determinations performed on wines made from grapes subjected to cryomaceration processes at different final temperatures (Chardonnay grape).
ParametersTout = 10.0 °CTout = 8.0 °CTout = 6.0 °CTout = 4.0 °C
Alcohol (%) (v/v)11.43 ± 0.30 a11.42 ± 0.10 a11.41 ± 0.20 a11.40 ± 0.10 a
Density 20.0 °C0.9901 ± 0.002 a0.9901 ± 0.001 a0.9901 ± 0.010 a0.9901 ± 0.003 a
Titratable acidity (g/L)6.05 ± 0.05 a6.03 ± 0.02 a6.00 ± 0.03 a6.00 ± 0.01 a
Volatile acidity (g/L)0.30 ± 0.02 a0.31 ± 0.01 a0.30 ± 0.01 a0.3 ± 0.02 a
Total extract (g/L)21.00 ± 0.48 a21.90 ± 0.51 a22.70 ± 0.46 a22.73 ± 0.59 a
pH3.20 ± 0.06 a3.23 ± 0.05 a3.25 ± 0.02 a3.26 ± 0.03 a
OD 420 nm0.11 ± 0.01 a0.15 ± 0.03 a0.162 ± 0.04 a0.163 ± 0.02 b
OD 320 nm6.9 ± 0.72 a7.7 ± 0.53 a8.4 ± 0.77 a8.5 ± 0.54 b
OD 280 nm8.5 ± 0.74 a9.3 ± 0.67 a10.8 ± 0.75 a10.9 ± 0.69 b
Total phenols (mg/L)233.5 ± 13.5 a336.4 ± 12.7 a438.4 ± 14.7 a440.4 ± 12.5 b
Catechins (mg/L)18.3 ± 0.24 a18.5 ± 0.32 a18.7 ± 0.24 a18.9 ± 0.33 b
(+)-Catechin (mg/L)3.39 ± 0.02 a3.40 ± 0.01 a3.42 ± 0.03 a3.43 ± 0.01 b
(−)-Epicatechin (mg/L)20.5 ± 3.7 a21.3 ± 2.9 a22.5 ± 3.9 a22.9 ± 2.8 b
Proanthocyanidins (mg/L)38 ± 2 a46 ± 5 a50 ± 3 a51 ± 4 b
OD optical density; (Mean value ± dxm = standard deviation of the mean). Analysis of variance (ANOVA): mean values within different columns designated by different letters are significantly different by the Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005; mean values within different columns designated by the same letters are not significantly different by the Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005.
Table 5. Sensory analysis: scores range from 1 to 100, in which the value 100 corresponds to the lowest quality.
Table 5. Sensory analysis: scores range from 1 to 100, in which the value 100 corresponds to the lowest quality.
Treated GrapeVisualSmellingGustatoryHarmonyScores
Chardonnay 10.0 °C6.7 ± 1.2 b13.2 ± 2.5 b19.0 ± 1.5 b8.0 ± 2.0 b46.3 ± 4.7
Chardonnay 8.0 °C5.9 ± 1.1 c11.3 ± 2.6 c18.4 ± 1.7 c9.9 ± 2.4 c43.9 ± 6.9
Chardonnay 6.0 °C5.1 ± 1.3 d10.1 ± 2.7 b17.1 ± 1.6 c9.1 ± 2.6 d41.4 ± 6.7
Chardonnay 4.0 °C5.2 ± 1.1 d10.2 ± 2.6 b17.2 ± 1.8 c9.1 ± 2.5 d41.7 ± 6.9
Analysis of variance (ANOVA): mean values within different columns designated by different letters are significantly different by Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005; mean values within different columns designated by the same letters are not significantly different by Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naviglio, D.; Formato, A.; Scaglione, G.; Montesano, D.; Pellegrino, A.; Villecco, F.; Gallo, M. Study of the Grape Cryo-Maceration Process at Different Temperatures. Foods 2018, 7, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7070107

AMA Style

Naviglio D, Formato A, Scaglione G, Montesano D, Pellegrino A, Villecco F, Gallo M. Study of the Grape Cryo-Maceration Process at Different Temperatures. Foods. 2018; 7(7):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7070107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naviglio, Daniele, Andrea Formato, Giampiero Scaglione, Domenico Montesano, Arcangelo Pellegrino, Francesco Villecco, and Monica Gallo. 2018. "Study of the Grape Cryo-Maceration Process at Different Temperatures" Foods 7, no. 7: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7070107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop