Next Article in Journal
Development of a Data Set of Pesticide Dissipation Rates in/on Various Plant Matrices for the Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB)
Previous Article in Journal
Chlamydospore Specific Proteins of Candida albicans
Previous Article in Special Issue
A High Resolution Dataset of Drought Indices for Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

A 2001–2015 Archive of Fractional Cover of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation for Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region

1
Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
2
Institute of Forest Resources Information Technique, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
3
Institute of Desertification Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 June 2017 / Revised: 19 August 2017 / Accepted: 21 August 2017 / Published: 25 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geomatic Data for Land Degradation Surveillance)

Abstract

:
Fractional covers of photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation are key indicators for land degradation surveillance in the dryland of China. However, there are no available, well validated, and multispectral-based products. Aiming for this, we selected the Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region as the study area, and utilized the linear spectral mixture model for generating the fractional cover of PV, NPV, and bare soil, with endmember spectra retrieved from the field measured endmember spectral library, based on the MODIS NBAR data from 2001 to 2015. The unmixing results were validated through comparison with the field samples. The results show the method adopted could acquire rational and accurate estimation of fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation (R2 = 0.6297, RMSE = 0.2443) and non-photosynthetic vegetation (R2 = 0.3747, RMSE = 0.2568). The dataset could provide key data support for the users in land degradation surveillance fields.
Data Set License: CC-BY

1. Summary

Fractional cover of vegetation plays a key role in resisting wind and water erosion, thus it has been widely used as the indicator for land degradation monitoring and assessment. From a functional perspective, vegetation can be categorized as photosynthetic (green leaves) and non-photosynthetic (wood, senescent material, and litter) material [1]. Unlike the well-developed multiple datasets of the fractional cover of PV, the datasets of the fractional cover of NPV are relatively rare, mainly because of the difficulty in differentiating NPV from the soil background, particularly when multispectral sensors are considered. However, NPV is common and widely distributed in the drylands due to the scarce, variable rainfall and low soil fertility. Therefore, simultaneously acquiring the fractional cover of PV and NPV would provide new insights for land degradation surveillance and land management.
In this context, an archive of fractional cover of PV and NPV was computed for the Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region (BTSSR), with monthly temporal resolution covering 2001 through 2015, and a spatial resolution of 500 m. The BTSSR—including 75 counties in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, and Inner Mongolia—has a total area of 458,000 km2, of which approximately 101,200 km2 is desertified, mainly in the Otindag and Horqin Sandy Lands, where land degradation has been attributed to overgrazing, excessive reclamation, deforestation, and climate change (Figure 1). The study area includes arid, semi-arid, dry sub-humid, and semi-humid climates, with an annual precipitation ranging from 200 mm in the northwest to 600 mm in the southeast.
So far, remote sensing is the unique means to acquire vegetation cover at large scales that might otherwise be costly and labor-intensive [2,3,4]. Over the past several decades, vegetation indices, which exploit the difference between visible and near-infrared (NIR) reflectance, have been widely utilized for estimating the fractional cover of vegetation. However, these indices are only sensitive to the amount of photosynthetic vegetation (PV), as well as its turgidity and greenness [5]. On the contrary, retrieving NPV coverage has been scarcely investigated at a large scale. The cellulose absorption index (CAI), computed from hyperspectral data, has been proven to be an effective method to resolve NPV cover [6,7,8], and linear unmixing of hyperspectral bands affected by cellulose and lignin were also utilized successfully to retrieve NPV cover [9] and monitor degradation and desertification [10]. However, these methods, based on the hyperspectral sensors, face a great challenge for land degradation surveillance due to the shortage of data acquisition ability for large regions. Considering multispectral sensors, some spectral indexes sensitive to NPV—such as the normalized difference senescent vegetation index (NDSVI) [11], a ratio of moderate resolution imaging spectrometer (MODIS) bands 7 and 6 [1], and the dead fuel index (DFI) [12] —were proposed in different environments. However, this approach is area-specific, and not well validated in other environments.
Spectral mixture analysis (SMA) provides another promising method for retrieving PV and NPV cover from multispectral imagery. Okin (2007), Okin et al. (2013), and Guerschman et al. (2015) used and compared variations of linear spectral unmixing techniques, including traditional SMA, multiple endmember SMA (MESMA), and relative spectral mixture analysis (RSMA) for resolving fractional cover using MODIS data [13,14,15]. Scarth et al. (2010) also applied similar techniques to Landsat data [16]. Furthermore, Li et al. (2016) applied the Automatically Monte Carlo spectral Unmixing model (AutoMCU) to the GF-1 data without SWIR bands for retrieving the PV and NPV cover in the sandy land [17]. The above-mentioned applications show that SMA with MODIS data is an effective mean for retrieving PV and NPV cover simultaneously. However, there is no available and well validated datasets in China, especially for the drylands. Thus, the PV and NPV cover datasets for the BTSSR based on AUTOMCU with MODIS data was produced in order to provide support for land degradation surveillance.

2. Data Description

2.1. Data and Metadata

The data cover land ranging from 38°50′ to 46°40′ N and from 109°30′ to 120°30′ E. The archive starts in January 2001 and ends in December 2015. It contains one raster layer per month for each of these variables:
Fractional cover of PV (%)
Fractional cover of NPV (%)
Fractional cover of bare soil (%)

2.2. Metadata

The archive is managed in a Geographic Information System (GIS). All the layers are in the GeoTiff format. The valid data range spans from 0 to 100. Table 1 describes the relevant metadata fields.

2.3. Dataset

The archive is organized in three large compressed files, one per variable. File names are according to the following conventions:
  • Characters 1–5: region name (btssr)
  • Characters 6–7: variable name (pv, np, or bs)
  • Characters 8–11: year (2001 to 2015)
  • Characters 12–13: month (01 to 12)
For example, ‘btssrnp200508’ refers to the fractional cover of NPV in August 2005 for the BTSSR.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

3.1.1. Remotely Sensed Data

We used MODIS Nadir Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) Adjusted Reflectance (NBAR) acquired between January 2001 and December 2015. MODIS NBAR data (MCD43A4) uses daily Terra and Aqua satellite overpasses to produce a 500 m resolution conglomerated image every eight days, and as such offers a high temporal frequency [18].
We acquired all data via the Google Earth Engine (https://code.earthengine.google.com). The NDVI was calculated for each layer, and the values with the maximum NDVI per month were selected to composing a NBAR dataset per month. The data were spatially subset to the study area dimensions. We used Google Earth Engine for all processing steps [19].

3.1.2. Field Spectroscopy

Spectral characteristics of PV, NPV, and bare soils are highly variable in the BTSSR, their spectral properties were thoroughly investigated with an Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) full-range (350–2500 nm) Fieldspec® 4 spectroradiometer with a 25° sensor foreoptic in 2014. All measurements were collected within two hours of local solar noon on clear sky days. Field spectra were collected during two periods. The first measurement was conducted on July 2014, representative of maximum PV existence. In order to acquire additional NPV spectra, a second measurement was conducted on November 2014, representative of maximum NPV existence. Based on the spectral response function of the MODIS sensor, the field spectra were resampled to the MODIS NBAR bands.

3.1.3. In Situ Fractional Ground Cover Data

In situ fractional ground cover data were collected in late August, the period of maximum green vegetation cover in 2015, following the method proposed by Muir et al. (2011) [20]. In natural vegetation communities, three 100-m measuring transects are laid in a star-shape. For vegetation in parallel rows, two 100-m measuring transects are oriented at 45 degrees across the sowing lines. An observation of the ground cover is made every meter of each transect. Finally, fractional cover was determined by combining the point records of all transects, 300 points for natural vegetation and 200 points for vegetation in rows, respectively. The coordinates of the cross point of transects were recorded by a global positioning system (Trimble GeoXT 2800-3000). Finally, ground covers of 24 fields with a size of 100 × 100 m were investigated for validating the fractional cover products.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Linear Spectral Mixture Model (LSMM)

In LSMM, the reflectance of a pixel is assumed to be a linear combination of the reflectance of the spectra of the endmembers, weighted by their fractional cover. In its general form, the LSMM can be described as
R i = j = 1 m ( f j W i , j ) + ε i 0 f j 1   and   j = 1 m f j = 1
where Ri is the measured reflectance of a mixed pixel in spectral band i, fj is the sub-pixel cover fraction of the j-th endmember in the pixel, and Wi,j is the j-th endmember reflectance for spectral band i, m is the number of the endmembers.
Endmembers are fundamental physical components that themselves are not mixtures of other components. Considering the coarse resolution of MODIS NBAR data, the average spectra of PV, NPV, and bare soil were utilized as the endmember spectra (Figure 2).

3.2.2. Unmixing Technique

A Fully Constrained Least Square (FCLS) algorithm was applied to solve the LSMM [21], with two important constraints on f k : 1, the fraction sum-to-one constraint (ASC) k = 1 n f k = 1 and 2 and the fraction nonnegativity constraint (ANC) f k 0 . For ASC, we include ASC in the signature matrix ρ by introducing a new signature matrix; For ANC, an iteration algorithm proposed by Chang and Heinz [22] was adopted by introducing a Lagrange multiplier vector.
The algorithms for FCLS were transformed into IDL (Interactive Data Language) routines, based on which, all the fractional covers were produced. The fractional cover of PV, NPV, and BS in September 2015 are shown in Figure 3.

3.2.3. Accuracy Assessment

To compare the performance of different SMA techniques on PV/NPV fractional cover estimation, two metrics were calculated against observed data, the RMSE and coefficient of determination (R2) of linear regression
RMSE = i = 1 n ( x i y i ) 2 / n
R 2 = i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) ( y i y ¯ ) 2 i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 i = 1 n ( y i y ¯ ) 2
where n is the number of fields,   x i is the estimated fractional cover of field i, y i   is the measured fractional cover of field i, x ¯ is the average value of the estimated fractional cover, and y ¯ is the average value of the measured fractional cover.
The validation results for fractional cover of PV and NPV were shown in Figure 4. Both fractional cover showed statistically significant correlations with observed data. Fractional cover of PV was with higher accuracy (R2 = 0.6297, RMSE = 0.2443) compared to NPV (R2 = 0.3747, RMSE = 0.2568). It is worth noting that the PV fraction was underestimated to some extent, while the NPV fraction was overestimated slightly, which could be caused by invariant endmember effects, scale, and time difference between field investigation and remote sensing data.

4. User Notes

The monthly fractional cover of PV, NPV, and bare soil are compressed in three independent zip files, one per variable. Each layer is stored in GeoTiff format, which could be used directly by most GIS and image processing software.
Total vegetation cover could be acquired through summing fractional cover of PV and NVP, which is a key indicator for land degradation surveillance. Also, period summaries of PV and NPV could be derived in order to match with other data.
Inconsistency between field-measured endmember and MODIS NBAR data would lead to some systematic error in the unmixing results. The dataset could be improved through calibrating with more field investigation data from the users.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFC0500806), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571421).

Author Contributions

Zhihai Gao and Xiaosong Li conceived and designed the products; Cuicui Ji, Hongyan Wang, and Bin Sun analyzed the data; Zengyuan Li and Bo Wu advised on the archive usability requirements and edited the manuscript; Xiaosong Li wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guerschman, J.P.; Hill, M.J.; Renzullo, L.J.; Barrett, D.J.; Marks, A.S.; Botha, E.J. Estimating fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil in the Australian tropical savanna region upscaling the EO-1 Hyperion and MODIS sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 928–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, X.; Zhang, J. Derivation of the green vegetation fraction of the whole china from 2000 to 2010 from MODIS data. Earth Interact. 2016, 20, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, Z.; Huete, A.R.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Yan, G.; Zhang, X. Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 101, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gitelson, A.A.; Kaufman, Y.J.; Stark, R.; Rundquist, D. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 80, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Okin, G.S. The contribution of brown vegetation to vegetation dynamics. Ecology 2010, 91, 743–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aguilar, J.; Evans, R.; Daughtry, C. Performance assessment of the cellulose absorption index method for estimating crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2012, 67, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daughtry, C.S.; Doraiswamy, P.; Hunt, E., Jr.; Stern, A.; McMurtrey, J., III; Prueger, J. Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity. Soil Tillage Res. 2006, 91, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, H.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X. Evaluating cellulose absorption index (CAI) for non-photosynthetic biomass estimation in the desert steppe of inner Mongolia. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 1716–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asner, G.P.; Heidebrecht, K.B. Imaging spectroscopy for desertification studies: Comparing AVIRIS and EO-1 Hyperion in Argentina drylands. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huete, A.R.; Miura, T.; Gao, X. Land cover conversion and degradation analyses through coupled soil-plant biophysical parameters derived from hyperspectral EO-1 Hyperion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41, 1268–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qi, J.; Wallace, O. Biophysical attributes estimation from satellite images in arid regions. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS’02), Toronto, ON, Canada, 24–28 June 2002; pp. 2000–2002. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao, X.; Chen, J.; Matsushita, B.; Imura, H. Developing a MODIS-based index to discriminate dead fuel from photosynthetic vegetation and soil background in the Asian steppe area. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 1589–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Okin, G.S. Relative spectral mixture analysis—A multitemporal index of total vegetation cover. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 106, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okin, G.S.; Clarke, K.D.; Lewis, M.M. Comparison of methods for estimation of absolute vegetation and soil fractional cover using MODIS normalized BRDF-adjusted reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 130, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guerschman, J.P.; Scarth, P.F.; McVicar, T.R.; Renzullo, L.J.; Malthus, T.J.; Stewart, J.B.; Rickards, J.E.; Trevithick, R. Assessing the effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil fractions from Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 161, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Scarth, P.; Röder, A.; Schmidt, M.; Denham, R. Tracking Grazing Pressure and Climate Interaction—The Role of Landsat Fractional Cover in Time Series Analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference, Alice Springs, Australia, 13–17 September 2010; pp. 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, X.; Zheng, G.; Wang, J.; Ji, C.; Sun, B.; Gao, Z. Comparison of methods for estimating fractional cover of photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation in the Otindag sandy land using GF-1 wide-field view data. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schaaf, C.B.; Gao, F.; Strahler, A.H.; Lucht, W.; Li, X.; Tsang, T.; Strugnell, N.C.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Y.; Muller, J.-P.; et al. First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 83, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goldblatt, R.; You, W.; Hanson, G.; Khandelwal, A.K. Detecting the Boundaries of Urban Areas in India: A Dataset for Pixel-Based Image Classification in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Muir, J.; Schmidt, M.; Tindall, D.; Trevithick, R.; Scarth, P.; Stewart, J. Field Measurement of Fractional Ground Cover: A Technical Handbook Supporting Ground Cover Monitoring for Australia; ABARES: Canberra, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Heinz, D.C.; Chang, C.-I. Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, C.-I.; Heinz, D.C. Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38, 1144–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of study area, land cover obtained from the China Cover 2010.
Figure 1. Location of study area, land cover obtained from the China Cover 2010.
Data 02 00027 g001
Figure 2. Endmember spectra utilized for LSMM.
Figure 2. Endmember spectra utilized for LSMM.
Data 02 00027 g002
Figure 3. PV, NPV, and BS fractional cover in September 2015.
Figure 3. PV, NPV, and BS fractional cover in September 2015.
Data 02 00027 g003
Figure 4. (a) PV and (b) NPV cover estimation accuracy validation against field samples.
Figure 4. (a) PV and (b) NPV cover estimation accuracy validation against field samples.
Data 02 00027 g004
Table 1. Data set characteristics of the fractional cover
Table 1. Data set characteristics of the fractional cover
CharacteristicDescription
Data formatGeoTiff
Data typeUnsigned integer
Time span2001–2015
Coordinate systemlatitude/longitude WGS84 (EPSG:4326)
Image dimensions2612 × 1765 (columns × rows)
No data value255
Number of layers3
Spatial resolution0.004492
Data range0–100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Li, Z.; Ji, C.; Wang, H.; Sun, B.; Wu, B.; Gao, Z. A 2001–2015 Archive of Fractional Cover of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation for Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region. Data 2017, 2, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/data2030027

AMA Style

Li X, Li Z, Ji C, Wang H, Sun B, Wu B, Gao Z. A 2001–2015 Archive of Fractional Cover of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation for Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region. Data. 2017; 2(3):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/data2030027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaosong, Zengyuan Li, Cuicui Ji, Hongyan Wang, Bin Sun, Bo Wu, and Zhihai Gao. 2017. "A 2001–2015 Archive of Fractional Cover of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation for Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region" Data 2, no. 3: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/data2030027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop