Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Host Soluble Mediators: Defying the Immunological Inertness of Aspergillus fumigatus Conidia
Previous Article in Journal
Fluconazole Resistance among Oral Candida Isolates from People Living with HIV/AIDS in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Cell Wall Integrity Signaling Pathway and Its Involvement in Secondary Metabolite Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The CWI Pathway: Regulation of the Transcriptional Adaptive Response to Cell Wall Stress in Yeast

Departamento de Microbiología II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS), 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010001
Submission received: 8 November 2017 / Revised: 11 December 2017 / Accepted: 19 December 2017 / Published: 21 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Cell Wall)

Abstract

:
Fungi are surrounded by an essential structure, the cell wall, which not only confers cell shape but also protects cells from environmental stress. As a consequence, yeast cells growing under cell wall damage conditions elicit rescue mechanisms to provide maintenance of cellular integrity and fungal survival. Through transcriptional reprogramming, yeast modulate the expression of genes important for cell wall biogenesis and remodeling, metabolism and energy generation, morphogenesis, signal transduction and stress. The yeast cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway, which is very well conserved in other fungi, is the key pathway for the regulation of this adaptive response. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the yeast transcriptional program elicited to counterbalance cell wall stress situations, the role of the CWI pathway in the regulation of this program and the importance of the transcriptional input received by other pathways. Modulation of this adaptive response through the CWI pathway by positive and negative transcriptional feedbacks is also discussed. Since all these regulatory mechanisms are well conserved in pathogenic fungi, improving our knowledge about them will have an impact in the developing of new antifungal therapies.

1. Cell Wall Organization and Structure in S. cerevisiae

Yeast cell integrity depends on the cell wall, an essential structure necessary not only for maintaining morphology but also for protecting cells against environmental stress conditions [1,2]. The cell wall is a macromolecular complex mainly composed of β-1,3-glucan, β-1,6-glucan, chitin and mannoproteins. Chitin, although a minor component, is essential for cell survival. β-1,3-glucan is the most abundant component of the yeast cell wall and serves as a backbone to which the other cell wall components are linked. The reducing ends of β-1,6-glucan and chitin are attached to the non-reducing end of β-1,3-glucan chains by an uncharacterized link and a β-1,4-linkage, respectively [3,4,5]. β-1,6-glucan is also attached to the chitin through β-1,3-linked oligogluco-residues that branch off the glucan. There is also a fraction of free chitin. Cell wall mannoproteins, including those involved in adhesion, cell wall remodeling, structural proteins and somatic antigens [6,7,8,9] can be linked directly to the β-1,3-glucan via alkali-labile bonds [9,10] and indirectly via β-1,6-glucan through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor [9,11]. The structure of the fungal cell wall is very well conserved among fungi despite several differences in cell wall composition exist [12]. Among fungal glucans, diversities in configuration, position of glyosidic bonds and branching have been reported [13]. β-1,3-glucan is the major cell wall component and is present in all the fungal species analyzed, whereas other polysaccharides including β-1,3/β-1,4-glucan, β-1,6-glucan or α-1,3-glucan are found in some but not all fungal cell walls [14]. For example, β-1,6-glucan is present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans [15,16], although it is absent in Aspergillus fumigatus [17]. In contrast, galactomannan and β-1,3/1,4-glucan are present in Aspergillus but not in yeast [18]. α-1,3-glucan plays an important role in the organization of the cell wall of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and many human pathogens but is absent from the Candida and Saccharomyces cell walls [12,14].
The essentiality of the cell wall for fungal growth viability and virulence together with the fact that most of the fungal cell wall components and the corresponding enzymatic activities necessary for cell wall biogenesis and remodeling are not present in mammals points this structure as an ideal target for therapeutic intervention against fungal infections [12,19]. Indeed, compounds belonging to the antifungal family of echinocandins, such as caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin, are able to selectively inhibit the synthesis of β-1,3-glucan in the cell wall [20] and are currently in clinical use [21]. However, the efficacy of these drugs can be offset by the induction of fungal cell wall compensatory mechanisms [22,23,24,25].

2. Yeast Adaptive Response to Cell Wall Stress: The CWI Pathway

The cell wall is a very dynamic structure whose properties vary constantly to be adapted to different growth conditions. The cell wall composition changes with the nature of carbon source, nutrient or oxygen availability, temperature or external pH [26,27]. Regulation of cell wall synthesis is part of cellular growth programs. The cell must remodel this structure to adapt cell growth during vegetative proliferation, mating pheromone-induced morphogenesis and bud formation, and hence cell division. In accordance, the transcription of many cell wall genes varies during the cell cycle and particularly at G1 for isotropic cell wall synthesis [15]. Cell wall remodeling includes breakage of preformed cross-links and the incorporation of new synthesized polysaccharides into the preexisting cell wall core by elongation, branching and cross-linking through transglycosylation enzymatic activities.
In particular, the cell wall structure needs to be remodeled under those stress conditions with a direct impact on cell wall integrity [28]. Therefore, treatments with cell wall perturbing agents that directly induce cell wall stress by interfering cell wall construction or mutational loss of proteins necessary for cell wall biogenesis elicit a rescue mechanism known as “compensatory salvage response” that provides compensatory synthesis of cell wall material and changes in the cross-linking between cell wall polymers necessary for maintenance of cellular integrity and fungal survival [1,29]. Among those chemical agents that interfere with cell wall biogenesis inducing cell wall stress in yeast are: Congo red and Calcofluor white, both of them binding to chitin and interfering with proper cell wall construction [30,31]; zymolyase which alters the cell wall through its β-1,3-glucanase, protease and chitinase activities [32] or echinocandins which inhibits β-1,3-glucan synthase [20]. Cell wall remodeling is also induced in response to a variety of environmental stresses that indirectly affect cell wall integrity and therefore activate the stress adaptive rescue responses, including heat, ethanol, osmotic or oxidative stresses [26,33].
One of the best characterized mechanisms included in the yeast compensatory response consists of variations in cell wall polysaccharide contents, the most remarkable being the increase in the chitin fraction [29,34]. Cells with mutations affecting the synthesis (fks1Δ) or elongation (gas1Δ) of β-1,3-glucan, as well as synthesis of β-1,6-glucan (kre6Δ), mannan (mnn9Δ), O-linked glycans and GPI anchors respond by depositing additional chitin in their lateral cell walls in compensation for compromised cell integrity [26,28,35,36,37,38]. In addition to an induction of chitin content, heat shock and caspofungin treatments also causes an increase in the β-1,6-glucan polysaccharide fraction and a partial reduction of β-1,3-glucan [26]. Compensatory mechanisms also include: an increment in the amount of several cell wall proteins [39,40], transient re-distribution of β-1,3-glucan synthase complex through the cell [41,42] and changes in the cross-linking between cell wall polymers [43]. In this sense, the proportion of chitin bound to β-1,6-glucan raises significantly under heat stress conditions whereas the chitin-β-1,3-glucan fraction decreases [6]. Moreover, increased resistance to zymolyase has been found under heat, ethanol, osmotic or oxidative stress conditions [26,33], suggesting an active cell wall remodeling.
The aim of all these changes triggered in the compensatory response must be to reinforce the cell wall by rebuilding cell wall blocks making them less flexible. In fact, overexpression of cell wall remodeling enzymes reduces fungal cell wall elasticity and increase osmotic stress resistance [44]. As discussed in more detail below, many of these changes are the result of a transcriptional reprogramming elicited by the yeast as a consequence of cell wall stress, that include among others, the induction of a large group of genes related to cell wall biogenesis [30,45].
Several signaling cascades has been involved in the regulation of cell wall stress responses, but the yeast cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway, governed by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) Slt2, is key for this purpose [1]. This pathway is very well conserved in the fungal kingdom [46]. It consists of a group of several plasma membrane sensors, Wsc1-3, Mid2 and Mtl1 that interact with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Rom2 activating the small GTPase Rho1, which then activates the protein kinase C (Pkc1). Pkc1 triggers a conserved MAPK module phosphorylating the MAPKKK Bck1 which activates a redundant pair of MAPKKs Mkk1/Mkk2 which finally phosphorylates and activates the MAPK Slt2 (also known as Mpk1). Slt2 acts on two transcription factors: Rlm1 [47] and SBF (Swi4/6) [48]. SBF is mainly involved in the regulation of genes during G1/S transition whereas Rlm1 is responsible for the transcriptional activation of most of those genes induced in response to cell wall stress (Figure 1).
CWI signaling can be monitored quantifying the phosphorylation of Slt2. Those stress conditions mentioned above with a direct impact on cell wall integrity, including treatments with chemical agents or mutations affecting cell wall biogenesis induce CWI signaling. The MAPK is also activated under a variety of other stress conditions that indirectly affects cell wall, including heat stress, hypo-osmotic shock, hyper-osmotic shock, ER stress, oxidative stress, high and low pH, DNA–damaging agents, etc. [1]. In some of these cases the mechanism by which Slt2 is activated is not completely understood.

3. The Transcriptional Program to Cell Wall Stress: Regulatory Mechanisms

DNA microarray and RNA-sequencing technologies have been powerful tools for the characterization of genome-wide transcriptional profiles, being an important step for the understanding of transcriptional stress responses. The first study focused on the characterization of the global transcriptional response under activation of the CWI pathway used a hyperactive allele of Mkk1 (MKK1S386P). This study revealed that constitutive activation of the CWI pathway, through the activation of the transcription factor Rlm1, induces the expression of approximately 25 genes, most of them related to cell wall biogenesis [40]. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes in different cell wall related mutants (gas1Δ, mnn9Δ, fks1Δ, kre6Δ and knr4Δ) with a constitutive Slt2 hyperactivation identified a stereotypical transcription response to cell wall damage, containing a set of almost 80 genes [45]. Other studies covered the analysis of the yeast response to transient cell wall stress by characterization of the transcriptional program to treatments with cell wall perturbing agents that interfe with cell wall biogenesis through different mechanisms of action like Congo red [30], Calcofluor white [49], zymolyase [50], caspofungin [51,52,53,54] or compounds like OGT2468 that inhibits O-mannosylation and affects cell wall mannoproteins [38]. Comparison of all these responses, which includes induction of approximately 100–200 genes, reveals the existence of both specific and common transcriptional profiles. Indeed, the cluster of genes induced in almost all conditions could be considered as a “transcriptional fingerprint” for cell wall stress [55]. This signature mainly comprises the induction of genes related to cell wall biogenesis and remodeling (SED1, CWP1, GFA1, YLR194C, PST1, PIR3, CRH1, HSP150 and CCW14), metabolism and energy generation (YHR209W and YPL088W), morphogenesis (DFG5), signal transduction (SLT2, MLP1, RLM1) and stress (HSP12 and YIL117C) [55].
Although the immediate role of gene expression in rapid adaptation is still being discussed, it is accepted that gene expression is important for long-term adaptation to stress and for protection against future stress [56,57]. In the case of the cell wall stress response, the transcriptional induction of cell wall related genes clearly reflects the necessity of cell wall remodeling. As detailed above, the induction of chitin synthesis as a consequence of cell wall stress is one of the main compensatory fungal responses. In agreement, genes encoding enzymes of the chitin synthesis pathway like GFA1, which encodes glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase, the first committed enzyme of this pathway [58] and CHS3, encoding the catalytic subunit of the chitin synthase III [59], are overexpressed in almost all the conditions referenced above. CRH1, which is also overexpressed in all cell wall stress conditions tested so far [60], encodes for a transglycosylase involved in the formation of chitin-glucan cross-links [6,61]. Thus, strengthening of cell wall under stress by overproduction of chitin also requires the covalent association of the chitin synthesized to the glucan network through the action of this activity which is induced at the transcriptional level [60]. In fact, a temperature shift from 30 °C to 38 °C increases the fraction of chitin attached to β-1,6-glucan as a consequence of CRH1 overexpression and relocalization of Crh1 and the homologous Crh2 to the lateral cell wall [6]. The overexpression of non-enzymatic structural cell wall proteins like Sed1, Cwp1, Pst1, or Ccw14, as consequence of the compensatory response, clearly reflects their collective role in maintaining cell wall stability [15,62].
Among the signaling-related genes overexpressed during most of the cell wall stress conditions there are: SLT2, which encodes for the CWI MAPK, MLP1, which encodes for a pseudokinase paralog to Slt2, and RLM1. Rlm1 is the transcription factor responsible for the expression of the majority of the genes induced under cell wall stress through the CWI pathway as deduced from global profiling of strains deleted in RLM1 when compared to a wild-type strain [30,63]. The transcriptional activity of Rlm1 is regulated by Slt2-mediated phosphorylation of residues Ser427 and Thr435 [64]. Binding of phosphorylated Rlm1 to the promoters of Rlm1-dependent genes and assembly of the transcription initiation machinery require complete nucleosome remodeling at these promoters that is achieved through the cooperation between the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF and SAGA complex [63,65].
In addition to transcription of G1/S related genes, SBF (Swi4/Swi6) regulates the expression of a small group of CWI genes, including FKS2, CHA1, YLR042C and YKR013W, through a non-catalytic mechanism [66,67,68]. This mechanism requires the activation of Slt2 (but not its catalytic activity) and Mlp1 to interact with Swi4 and direct both to SBF-binding sites independently of Swi6. Slt2 and Mlp1 travels along the coding region associated with the Pol II and Paf1C to avoid premature termination by the Sen1-Nrd1-Nab3 complex [66].
Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of yeast mutant strains deleted in different components of CWI and other signaling pathways, like the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) and PKA pathways, allowed the identification of critical regulatory elements for the cell wall transcriptional responses. In this way, subtle differences in the regulatory mechanisms involved depending on the type of stress were found. The Congo red-mediated damage is sensed through Mid2 and elicits a transcriptional response through the CWI pathway that depends almost completely on the MAPK Slt2 and the transcription factor Rlm1 [30,53,63] (Figure 1). Cell wall damage caused by zymolyase also induces a main response related to adaptation to cell wall integrity defects regulated by Slt2 and Rlm1. However, this response requires previous activation of elements of the HOG pathway. The yeast adaptive program to hyperosmotic stress that includes temporary arrest of cell-cycle progression, adjustment of transcription and translation patterns, and the synthesis and retention of glycerol, is governed by the HOG pathway [69]. Under zymolyase-mediated cell wall damage, phosphorylation of Slt2 depends on components of the Sho1 branch of the HOG pathway, and it requires essential components of the CWI pathway as Mkk1/Mkk2, Bck1 and Pkc1 but not any of the membrane sensors and guanine nucleotide exchange factors belonging to this pathway. In fact, zymolyase damage is sensed through Hkr1 [32], the sensor of the Sho1 branch of the HOG pathway. Thus, in agreement with the model of sequential activation of the HOG and CWI pathways, activation of Slt2 by a previous activation of the elements of the Sho1 branch of the HOG pathway is responsible, through Rlm1, for the majority of cell wall transcriptional adaptive response to zymolyase [50,53,70] (Figure 1).
Cell wall damage caused by the echinocandin caspofungin, an inhibitor of β-1,3-glucan synthase, is sensed through Wsc1 [51,52] and the transcriptional response under this condition is completely dependent on this sensor [53,54]. The global transcriptional response elicited by inhibition of the β-1,3-glucan synthesis includes a set of genes dependent on the MAPK Slt2 and the transcription factor Rlm1 and a broad group of genes regulated independently of Slt2. Cell wall alterations derived from this stress induce, through Wsc1, the activation of the CWI pathway and parallel inhibition of PKA signaling [51,52,53,54] (Figure 1). Activation of Slt2 triggers the corresponding CWI transcriptional response. Negative regulation of PKA signaling promotes nuclear localization of Msn2 and cellular glycogen accumulation, a decrease of intracellular cAMP and active GTPase Ras2 levels, together with a reduction in the phosphorylation of known substrates of PKA, all these effects relying on the Wsc1 sensor [54]. In consequence, the transcriptional induction of Slt2-independent transcripts in response to caspofungin correspond to genes that exhibit upregulated expression in conditions where the cAMP/PKA pathway is deactivated.
All these studies reflect the importance of the CWI pathway and the input received by other pathways to overcome cell wall stress situations, showing the complexity of the signal transduction machinery responsible for this regulation.

4. Modulation of the CWI Pathway through the Transcriptional Response

The timing of the yeast cell wall stress adaptive response mediated by the CWI pathway and the development of the corresponding transcriptional response is very different to that of other MAPK signaling pathways like the HOG pathway or the mating signaling pathway. In contrast to the rapid and transient activation of Hog1 following osmostress [69], CWI signaling is activated persistently at elevated temperatures or treatment with cell wall perturbing agents. Thus, cell wall damage caused by direct cell wall perturbing agents Calcofluor white, Congo red and zymolyase elicits a slow and sustained response over time. Under these cell wall stress conditions, the MAPK Slt2 is phosphorylated within 15 min upon stress and this activation reaches a maximum value after 1 to 2 h. After treatment, the phosphorylation of the MAPK decreases but it can still be detected even after 6 h [30,39,70]. Gene expression pattern correlates with Slt2 activation. Thus, after one hour of cell wall stress there are some genes whose expression is induced, being a maximum response reached after 2–3 h [30]. Moreover, the kinetic response indicates the existence of a transient response for one group of genes which includes those related to signal transduction, and a more sustained response including those involved in cell wall construction and remodeling [30].
Triggering sustained or transient cellular responses through MAPK signaling pathways requires precise regulatory mechanisms that define different dynamics which determine different outputs [71]. An important way of regulating these pathways is at the level of MAPK phosphorylation by protein phosphatases. In this context, Slt2 activity can be negatively regulated by dephosphorylation through the activity of different phosphatases such as Ptp2 and Ptp3 [72], Ptc1 [73,74] and the dual-specificity protein phosphatases Msg5 [75] and Sdp1, which specifically interacts with and inactivates Slt2 [76]. Interestingly, Ptp2 and Msg5 are transcriptionally induced in several cell wall stress conditions in a Slt2-dependent manner, indicating a transcriptional negative feedback at this level [30,50,72,77] (Figure 1). Additionally, other negative feedback events contribute to attenuate CWI pathway responses (Figure 1). Slt2 exerts a negative feedback by downregulation of the guanine exchange factor activity of Rom2 through a retrophosphorylation mechanism [78]. Retrophosphorylation of the MAPKKs Mkk1 and Mkk2 by Slt2 has also been reported [79]. Moreover, ubiquitination of Pkc1 by Ubp3 also contribute to attenuate the induction of the CWI pathway [80].
In contrast to negative autoregulation, which speed up transcriptional gene circuits [81], positive autoregulation that occurs when a transcription factor enhance its own production rate amplifies gene expression and slow down the kinetics of gene expression [82]. As described above, expression of RLM1 and SLT2 is induced by cell wall stress in an Rlm1-dependent manner [30,40,63,83]. Upon cell wall stress, Rlm1 is recruited to the promoters of RLM1 and SLT2 exerting positive-feedback mechanisms on the expression of both genes. Abrogation of the autoregulatory feedback mechanism on RLM1 by site-directed mutagenesis of the Rlm1-binding box in the upstream regulatory sequence of this gene severely affects the transcriptional response elicited by activation of the CWI pathway [84]. Blockade of this positive feedback mechanism mediated by Rlm1 results in the lack of RLM1 induction and Rlm1 protein overexpression, as well as an important reduction of its transcriptional target SLT2, resulting in a decrease of 60–70% in the expression levels of CWI-dependent genes. Abrogation of the transcriptional feedback exerted by Rlm1 on SLT2, affects overexpression of SLT2 but not RLM1. This mechanism has less impact on the CWI output response than the Rlm1 autoregulatory feedback but partially contribute to regulate gene expression levels, particularly under long-term stress [84].
Therefore, the MAPK Slt2 regulates Rlm1 activation by phosphorylation and this activation is required for a proper CWI transcriptional response. However, phosphorylation of the MAPK and Rlm1 is not sufficient for a full functional CWI transcriptional response. Concurrent SLT2 and RLM1-mediated positive feedback mechanisms are also required. Sustained patterns of gene expression are mainly achieved by these positive autoregulatory circuits based on continued activation of Rlm1.

5. Perspectives

Antifungal resistance represents a major challenge for treating invasive fungal infections due to the limited arsenal of available antifungal agents [85]. The discovery of novel antifungal drugs relies on the discovery of unexplored targets. Current antifungals include the family of echinocandins which targets the cell wall as non-competitive inhibitors of the β-1,3-glucan synthase. Inhibitors of the chitin synthesis, although very active in vitro, are less effective in vivo and therefore are not in clinical use [86].
Yeast cell wall adaptive responses may lead to a decrease in the effectiveness of antifungal treatments targeting the cell wall. These responses are very well conserved in other pathogenic fungi [22,23]. For example, the induction of chitin synthesis as a consequence of the cell wall stress caused by caspofungin also occurs in C. albicans [22] and A. fumigatus [23,24,87,88] and can compromise the clinical treatment success [25,89,90]. Therefore, understanding cellular mechanisms of cell wall remodeling upon cell wall stress, including the cross-linking enzymes and regulatory circuits involved in fungal cell wall stress adaptation could allow the discovery of new cell wall targets and potential antifungal drugs [91,92] or potentiate currently used cell wall interfering drugs. In this sense, combination therapies that synergistically target β-1,3-glucan synthesis and other activities regulated through the compensatory response and the CWI pathway, like those executed by the Crh transglycosylase proteins which are responsible for the cross-linking between chitin and glucan [60,61], can be envisioned as an effective strategy for the development of future successful antifungal therapies. Additionally, the recently described novel connection between the CWI and the PKA pathways to regulate the cell wall stress mediated by caspofungin also points to possible combinational therapies interfering PKA regulation and cell wall integrity [54].
In addition to the clinical interest of these studies, they could also be relevant for biotechnological purposes derived from the interest in the optimization of fermentation processes [27,93] or production of cell wall polysaccharides (i.e., glucans, mannoproteins, chitin) for functional foods and pharmaceutical and cosmetic purposes [94].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía (MINECO) (grants BIO2013-48136-P and BIO2016-79289-P to Javier Arroyo). All members of our research group (UCM-920640: Yeast Functional Genomics) at the Department of Microbiology II are also acknowledged for their support.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to write the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levin, D.E. Regulation of cell wall biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The cell wall integrity signaling pathway. Genetics 2011, 189, 1145–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Orlean, P. Architecture and biosynthesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Genetics 2012, 192, 775–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kapteyn, J.C.; Montijn, R.C.; Vink, E.; de la Cruz, J.; Llobell, A.; Douwes, J.E.; Shimoi, H.; Lipke, P.N.; Klis, F.M. Retention of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall proteins through a phosphodiester-linked β-1,3-/β-1,6-glucan heteropolymer. Glycobiology 1996, 6, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kollar, R.; Reinhold, B.B.; Petrakova, E.; Yeh, H.J.; Ashwell, G.; Drgonova, J.; Kapteyn, J.C.; Klis, F.M.; Cabib, E. Architecture of the yeast cell wall. β(1→6)-glucan interconnects mannoprotein, β(1→3)-glucan, and chitin. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 17762–17775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kollar, R.; Petrakova, E.; Ashwell, G.; Robbins, P.W.; Cabib, E. Architecture of the yeast cell wall. The linkage between chitin and β(1→3)-glucan. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cabib, E.; Blanco, N.; Grau, C.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Arroyo, J. Crh1p and Crh2p are required for the cross-linking of chitin to β(1–6)glucan in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dranginis, A.M.; Rauceo, J.M.; Coronado, J.E.; Lipke, P.N. A biochemical guide to yeast adhesins: Glycoproteins for social and antisocial occasions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mouyna, I.; Fontaine, T.; Vai, M.; Monod, M.; Fonzi, W.A.; Diaquin, M.; Popolo, L.; Hartland, R.P.; Latgé, J.P. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glucanosyltransferases play an active role in the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14882–14889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. De Groot, P.W.; Ram, A.F.; Klis, F.M. Features and functions of covalently linked proteins in fungal cell walls. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 657–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kapteyn, J.C.; Van Egmond, P.; Sievi, E.; Van Den, E.H.; Makarow, M.; Klis, F.M. The contribution of the O-glycosylated protein Pir2p/Hsp150 to the construction of the yeast cell wall in wild-type cells and β-1,6-glucan-deficient mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31, 1835–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ferguson, M.A.J.; Kinoshita, T.; Hart, G.W. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Freeze, H.H., Stanley, P., Bertozzi, C.R., Hart, G.W., Etzler, M.E., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.P.; Munro, C.A. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  13. Synytsya, A.; Novak, M. Structural diversity of fungal glucans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 792–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Free, S.J. Fungal cell wall organization and biosynthesis. Adv. Genet. 2013, 81, 33–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Lesage, G.; Bussey, H. Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 317–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ruiz-Herrera, J.; Elorza, M.V.; Valentin, E.; Sentandreu, R. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenicity. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Aimanianda, V.; Clavaud, C.; Simenel, C.; Fontaine, T.; Delepierre, M.; Latgé, J.P. Cell wall β-(1,6)-glucan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Structural characterization and in situ synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 13401–13412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Latgé, J.P. The cell wall: A carbohydrate armour for the fungal cell. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tada, R.; Latgé, J.P.; Aimanianda, V. Undressing the fungal cell wall/cell membrane—The antifungal drug targets. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 3738–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kurtz, M.B.; Douglas, C.M. Lipopeptide inhibitors of fungal glucan synthase. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1997, 35, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bal, A.M. The echinocandins: Three useful choices or three too many? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 35, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Walker, L.A.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A. Fungal echinocandin resistance. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fortwendel, J.R.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Perfect, B.Z.; Rogg, L.E.; Perfect, J.R.; Steinbach, W.J. Transcriptional regulation of chitin synthases by calcineurin controls paradoxical growth of Aspergillus fumigatus in response to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Meyer, V.; Damveld, R.A.; Arentshorst, M.; Stahl, U.; van den Hondel, C.A.; Ram, A.F. Survival in the presence of antifungals: Genome-wide expression profiling of Aspergillus niger in response to sublethal concentrations of caspofungin and fenpropimorph. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 32935–32948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Walker, L.A.; Lee, K.K.; Munro, C.A.; Gow, N.A. Caspofungin treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus results in ChsG-dependent upregulation of chitin synthesis and the formation of chitin-rich microcolonies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5932–5941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schiavone, M.; Vax, A.; Formosa, C.; Martin-Yken, H.; Dague, E.; Francois, J.M. A combined chemical and enzymatic method to determine quantitatively the polysaccharide components in the cell wall of yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Aguilar-Uscanga, B.; Francois, J.M. A study of the yeast cell wall composition and structure in response to growth conditions and mode of cultivation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Klis, F.M.; Boorsma, A.; De Groot, P.W. Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2006, 23, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Popolo, L.; Gualtieri, T.; Ragni, E. The yeast cell-wall salvage pathway. Med. Mycol. 2001, 39 (Suppl. 1), 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. García, R.; Bermejo, C.; Grau, C.; Pérez, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Francois, J.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. The global transcriptional response to transient cell wall damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its regulation by the cell integrity signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15183–15195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ketela, T.; Green, R.; Bussey, H. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mid2p is a potential cell wall stress sensor and upstream activator of the Pkc1-Mpk1 cell integrity pathway. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 3330–3340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Díez-Muñiz, S.; Bermejo, C.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. Activation of the yeast cell wall integrity MAPK pathway by zymolyase depends on protease and glucanase activities and requires the mucin-like protein Hkr1 but not Msb2. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 3675–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Charoenbhakdi, S.; Dokpikul, T.; Burphan, T.; Techo, T.; Auesukaree, C. Vacuolar H+-ATPase protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells against ethanol-induced oxidative and cell wall stresses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3121–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Smits, G.J.; Kapteyn, J.C.; Van Den, E.H.; Klis, F.M. Cell wall dynamics in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dallies, N.; Francois, J.; Paquet, V. A new method for quantitative determination of polysaccharides in the yeast cell wall. Application to the cell wall defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gentzsch, M.; Tanner, W. The PMT gene family: Protein O-glycosylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is vital. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 5752–5759. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Popolo, L.; Gilardelli, D.; Bonfante, P.; Vai, M. Increase in chitin as an essential response to defects in assembly of cell wall polymers in the ggp1Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Arroyo, J.; Hutzler, J.; Bermejo, C.; Ragni, E.; García-Cantalejo, J.; Botias, P.; Piberger, H.; Schott, A.; Sanz, A.B.; Strahl, S. Functional and genomic analyses of blocked protein O-mannosylation in baker’s yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 79, 1529–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. De Nobel, H.; Ruiz, C.; Martin, H.; Morris, W.; Brul, S.; Molina, M.; Klis, F.M. Cell wall perturbation in yeast results in dual phosphorylation of the Slt2/Mpk1 MAP kinase and in an Slt2-mediated increase in FKS2-LacZ expression, glucanase resistance and thermotolerance. Microbiology 2000, 146, 2121–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jung, U.S.; Levin, D.E. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression regulated by the yeast cell wall integrity signalling pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 34, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kapteyn, J.C.; Ram, A.F.; Groos, E.M.; Kollar, R.; Montijn, R.C.; Van Den, E.H.; Llobell, A.; Cabib, E.; Klis, F.M. Altered extent of cross-linking of β 1,6-glucosylated mannoproteins to chitin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with reduced cell wall β 1,3-glucan content. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 6279–6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Delley, P.A.; Hall, M.N. Cell wall stress depolarizes cell growth via hyperactivation of Rho1. J. Cell. Biol. 1999, 147, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kapteyn, J.C.; Van Den Ende, H.; Klis, F.M. The contribution of cell wall proteins to the organization of the yeast cell wall. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1426, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ene, I.V.; Walker, L.A.; Schiavone, M.; Lee, K.K.; Martin-Yken, H.; Dague, E.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A.; Brown, A.J. Cell wall remodeling enzymes modulate fungal cell wall elasticity and osmotic stress resistance. mBio 2015, 6, e00986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lagorce, A.; Hauser, N.C.; Labourdette, D.; Rodríguez, C.; Martin-Yken, H.; Arroyo, J.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Francois, J. Genome-wide analysis of the response to cell wall mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 20345–20357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dichtl, K.; Samantaray, S.; Wagener, J. Cell wall integrity signalling in human pathogenic fungi. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Watanabe, Y.; Takaesu, G.; Hagiwara, M.; Irie, K.; Matsumoto, K. Characterization of a serum response factor-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rlm1, which has transcriptional activity regulated by the Mpk1 (Slt2) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Baetz, K.; Moffat, J.; Haynes, J.; Chang, M.; Andrews, B. Transcriptional coregulation by the cell integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2 and the cell cycle regulator Swi4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 6515–6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Boorsma, A.; De Nobel, H.; ter Riet, B.; Bargmann, B.; Brul, S.; Hellingwerf, K.J.; Klis, F.M. Characterization of the transcriptional response to cell wall stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2004, 21, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Bermejo, C.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. The high osmotic response and cell wall integrity pathways cooperate to regulate transcriptional responses to zymolyase-induced cell wall stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 10901–10911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Reinoso-Martin, C.; Schuller, C.; Schuetzer-Muehlbauer, M.; Kuchler, K. The yeast protein kinase c cell integrity pathway mediates tolerance to the antifungal drug caspofungin through activation of Slt2p mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Eukaryot. Cell 2003, 2, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Agarwal, A.K.; Rogers, P.D.; Baerson, S.R.; Jacob, M.R.; Barker, K.S.; Cleary, J.D.; Walker, L.A.; Nagle, D.G.; Clark, A.M. Genome-wide expression profiling of the response to polyene, pyrimidine, azole, and echinocandin antifungal agents in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 34998–35015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bermejo, C.; García, R.; Straede, A.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Nombela, C.; Heinisch, J.J.; Arroyo, J. Characterization of sensor-specific stress response by transcriptional profiling of wsc1 and mid2 deletion strains and chimeric sensors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2010, 14, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. García, R.; Bravo, E.; Díez-Muñiz, S.; Nombela, C.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Arroyo, J. A novel connection between the cell wall integrity and the PKA pathways regulates cell wall stress response in yeast. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arroyo, J.; Bermejo, C.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M. Genomics in the detection of damage in microbial systems: Cell wall stress in yeast. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 44–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Berry, D.B.; Gasch, A.P. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 4580–4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Westfall, P.J.; Patterson, J.C.; Chen, R.E.; Thorner, J. Stress resistance and signal fidelity independent of nuclear MAPK function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 12212–12217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lagorce, A.; Berre-Anton, V.; Aguilar-Uscanga, B.; Martin-Yken, H.; Dagkessamanskaia, A.; Francois, J. Involvement of GFA1, which encodes glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase, in the activation of the chitin synthesis pathway in response to cell-wall defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shaw, J.A.; Mol, P.C.; Bowers, B.; Silverman, S.J.; Valdivieso, M.H.; Durán, A.; Cabib, E. The function of chitin synthases 2 and 3 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J. Cell. Biol. 1991, 114, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Arroyo, J.; Farkas, V.; Sanz, A.B.; Cabib, E. Strengthening the fungal cell wall through chitin-glucan cross-links: Effects on morphogenesis and cell integrity. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cabib, E.; Arroyo, J. How carbohydrates sculpt cells: Chemical control of morphogenesis in the yeast cell wall. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ragni, E.; Sipiczki, M.; Strahl, S. Characterization of Ccw12p, a major key player in cell wall stability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2007, 24, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sanz, A.B.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Díez-Muñiz, S.; Nombela, C.; Peterson, C.L.; Arroyo, J. Chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complex is essential for transcription mediated by the yeast cell wall integrity MAPK pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23, 2805–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Jung, U.S.; Sobering, A.K.; Romeo, M.J.; Levin, D.E. Regulation of the yeast Rlm1 transcription factor by the Mpk1 cell wall integrity MAP kinase. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sanz, A.B.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. Cooperation between SAGA and SWI/SNF complexes is required for efficient transcriptional responses regulated by the yeast MAPK Slt2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 7159–7172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kim, K.Y.; Levin, D.E. Mpk1 MAPK association with the Paf1 complex blocks Sen1-mediated premature transcription termination. Cell 2011, 144, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, K.Y.; Levin, D.E. Transcriptional reporters for genes activated by cell wall stress through a non-catalytic mechanism involving Mpk1 and SBF. Yeast 2010, 27, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kim, K.Y.; Truman, A.W.; Levin, D.E. Yeast Mpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase activates transcription through Swi4/Swi6 by a noncatalytic mechanism that requires upstream signal. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Saito, H.; Posas, F. Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics 2012, 192, 289–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bermejo, C.; Rodríguez, E.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; de la Concepcion, M.L.R.; Rivas, C.; Arias, P.; Nombela, C.; Posas, F.; Arroyo, J. The sequential activation of the yeast HOG and SLT2 pathways is required for cell survival to cell wall stress. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Santos, S.D.; Verveer, P.J.; Bastiaens, P.I. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mattison, C.P.; Spencer, S.S.; Kresge, K.A.; Lee, J.; Ota, I.M. Differential regulation of the cell wall integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in budding yeast by the protein tyrosine phosphatases Ptp2 and Ptp3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 7651–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Du, Y.; Walker, L.; Novick, P.; Ferro-Novick, S. Ptc1p regulates cortical er inheritance via Slt2p. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 4413–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gonzalez, A.; Ruiz, A.; Serrano, R.; Arino, J.; Casamayor, A. Transcriptional profiling of the protein phosphatase 2c family in yeast provides insights into the unique functional roles of Ptc1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 35057–35069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Flandez, M.; Cosano, I.C.; Nombela, C.; Martin, H.; Molina, M. Reciprocal regulation between Slt2 MAPK and isoforms of Msg5 dual-specificity protein phosphatase modulates the yeast cell integrity pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 11027–11034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Collister, M.; Didmon, M.P.; MacIsaac, F.; Stark, M.J.; MacDonald, N.Q.; Keyse, S.M. YIL113W encodes a functional dual-specificity protein phosphatase which specifically interacts with and inactivates the Slt2/Mpk1p MAP kinase in S. cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2002, 527, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hahn, J.S.; Thiele, D.J. Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Slt2 kinase pathway by the stress-inducible Sdp1 dual specificity phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21278–21284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Guo, S.; Shen, X.; Yan, G.; Ma, D.; Bai, X.; Li, S.; Jiang, Y. A MAP kinase dependent feedback mechanism controls Rho1 GTPase and actin distribution in yeast. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Cid, V.J.; Molina, M. Retrophosphorylation of Mkk1 and Mkk2 MAPKKS by the Slt2 MAPK in the yeast cell integrity pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31174–31185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Ayalew, M.; Ruff, J.A. Down-regulation of Pkc1-mediated signaling by the deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp3. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 1954–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Becskei, A.; Serrano, L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 2000, 405, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Singh, V. Recent advancements in synthetic biology: Current status and challenges. Gene 2014, 535, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Roberts, C.J.; Nelson, B.; Marton, M.J.; Stoughton, R.; Meyer, M.R.; Bennett, H.A.; He, Y.D.; Dai, H.; Walker, W.L.; Hughes, T.R.; et al. Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 2000, 287, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. García, R.; Sanz, A.B.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. Rlm1 mediates positive autoregulatory transcriptional feedback that is essential for Slt2-dependent gene expression. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wiederhold, N.P. The antifungal arsenal: Alternative drugs and future targets. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhang, D.; Miller, M.J. Polyoxins and nikkomycins: Progress in synthetic and biological studies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1999, 5, 73–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Cowen, L.E.; Steinbach, W.J. Stress, drugs, and evolution: The role of cellular signaling in fungal drug resistance. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 747–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Verwer, P.E.; van Duijn, M.L.; Tavakol, M.; Bakker-Woudenberg, I.A.; van de Sande, W.W. Reshuffling of Aspergillus fumigatus cell wall components chitin and β-glucan under the influence of caspofungin or nikkomycin z alone or in combination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1595–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Walker, L.A.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Walker, L.A.; Munro, C.A.; de Bruijn, I.; Lenardon, M.D.; McKinnon, A.; Gow, N.A. Stimulation of chitin synthesis rescues Candida albicans from echinocandins. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Pérez-Diaz, R.M.; Alvarez, S.; Bermejo, C.; García, R.; Santiago, C.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. The ‘yeast cell wall chip’—A tool to analyse the regulation of cell wall biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 2005, 151, 2241–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Díez-Muñiz, S.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. A yeast strain biosensor to detect cell wall-perturbing agents. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 133, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kitichantaropas, Y.; Boonchird, C.; Sugiyama, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Harashima, S.; Auesukaree, C. Cellular mechanisms contributing to multiple stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with potential use in high-temperature ethanol fermentation. AMB Express 2016, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bashir, K.M.I.; Choi, J.S. Clinical and Physiological Perspectives of β-Glucans: The Past, Present, and Future. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The cell wall integrity (CWI) signaling pathway. Cell wall damage is sensed (wave arrows) at the plasma membrane through cell-surface proteins that stimulate nucleotide exchange on Rho1 and activation of Pkc1. The main role of activated Pkc1 is to trigger the MAPK module (Bck1, Mkk1/Mkk2 and Slt2). Once phosphorylated, the MAPK Slt2 activates two different transcription factors, SBF (Swi4/Swi6) and Rlm1. Cell wall damage caused by Congo red (CR) is sensed mainly through Mid2 to activate the CWI pathway; Zymolyase (Zym) mediated cell wall stress requires Hkr1 sensor and elements of the Sho1 branch of the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway to activate Rho1; Caspofungin (Cas) is sensed through Wsc1 leading to the activation of the CWI pathway and parallel inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) signaling (solid lines) Modulatory mechanisms of CWI signaling are represented with broken lines. Rlm1 elicits transcriptional positive feedback loops on the expression of RLM1 and SLT2. In contrast, attenuation of the CWI pathway requires negative retrophosphorylation feedback loops mediated by Slt2 on Rom2 and Mkk1/2 and the Rlm1-dependent transcriptional induction of the Slt2 phosphatases Ptp2 and Msg5. In addition, other Slt2 phosphatases like Ptp3, Sdp1 and Ptc1 and ubiquitination of Pkc1 by Ubp3 also contribute to attenuate the induction of CWI pathway. Arrows and T symbols represent activation (positive) and inhibitory (negative) events, respectively.
Figure 1. The cell wall integrity (CWI) signaling pathway. Cell wall damage is sensed (wave arrows) at the plasma membrane through cell-surface proteins that stimulate nucleotide exchange on Rho1 and activation of Pkc1. The main role of activated Pkc1 is to trigger the MAPK module (Bck1, Mkk1/Mkk2 and Slt2). Once phosphorylated, the MAPK Slt2 activates two different transcription factors, SBF (Swi4/Swi6) and Rlm1. Cell wall damage caused by Congo red (CR) is sensed mainly through Mid2 to activate the CWI pathway; Zymolyase (Zym) mediated cell wall stress requires Hkr1 sensor and elements of the Sho1 branch of the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway to activate Rho1; Caspofungin (Cas) is sensed through Wsc1 leading to the activation of the CWI pathway and parallel inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) signaling (solid lines) Modulatory mechanisms of CWI signaling are represented with broken lines. Rlm1 elicits transcriptional positive feedback loops on the expression of RLM1 and SLT2. In contrast, attenuation of the CWI pathway requires negative retrophosphorylation feedback loops mediated by Slt2 on Rom2 and Mkk1/2 and the Rlm1-dependent transcriptional induction of the Slt2 phosphatases Ptp2 and Msg5. In addition, other Slt2 phosphatases like Ptp3, Sdp1 and Ptc1 and ubiquitination of Pkc1 by Ubp3 also contribute to attenuate the induction of CWI pathway. Arrows and T symbols represent activation (positive) and inhibitory (negative) events, respectively.
Jof 04 00001 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanz, A.B.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Peña, J.M.; Arroyo, J. The CWI Pathway: Regulation of the Transcriptional Adaptive Response to Cell Wall Stress in Yeast. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010001

AMA Style

Sanz AB, García R, Rodríguez-Peña JM, Arroyo J. The CWI Pathway: Regulation of the Transcriptional Adaptive Response to Cell Wall Stress in Yeast. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanz, Ana Belén, Raúl García, José M. Rodríguez-Peña, and Javier Arroyo. 2018. "The CWI Pathway: Regulation of the Transcriptional Adaptive Response to Cell Wall Stress in Yeast" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop