Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
Previous Article in Journal
From Concept to Commerce: Developing a Successful Fungal Endophyte Inoculant for Agricultural Crops
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuro-Immune Mechanisms of Anti-Cryptococcal Protection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/jof4010025
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans

by
Steven T. Denham
and
Jessica C. S. Brown
*
Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010025
Submission received: 31 January 2018 / Revised: 9 February 2018 / Accepted: 16 February 2018 / Published: 17 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cryptococcus and Cryptococcosis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cryptococcus neoformans is a common environmental saprophyte and human fungal pathogen that primarily causes disease in immunocompromised individuals. Similar to many environmentally acquired human fungal pathogens, C. neoformans initiates infection in the lungs. However, the main driver of mortality is invasive cryptococcosis leading to fungal meningitis. After C. neoformans gains a foothold in the lungs, a critical early step in invasion is transversal of the respiratory epithelium. In this review, we summarize current knowledge relating to pulmonary escape. We focus on fungal factors that allow C. neoformans to disseminate from the lungs via intracellular and extracellular routes.

1. Introduction

The lungs present a mucosal barrier that is in constant contact with airborne microbes, including fungi. In fact, it is estimated that every breath contains 1–10 fungal spores [1]. Many human fungal pathogens, such as Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergilllus spp., Coccidiodes immitis, Blastomyces dermatitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum, initiate infection via inhalation [2]. The lung mucosa can prevent these fungi from invading deeper tissues, where they can cause more harm and become increasingly difficult to treat [2,3,4]. Thus, it is paramount for the host to maintain proper barrier function and immunosurveillance in order to prevent the invasion of potentially harmful microbes [5]. Respiratory epithelial cells and the tight junctions that bridge them form a physical barrier against microbial invasion [6]. The lung epithelium also plays a constitutive role in regulating microbial load through mechanisms such as secretion of antimicrobial defensins and mucociliary clearance [6]. Both resident professional immune cells and epithelial cells are capable of sensing and coordinating immune responses to microbes [7].
One prevalent human fungal pathogen that begins its infectious lifestyle in the lungs is Cryptococcus neoformans. C. neoformans is globally distributed and extremely common in the environment, where it is frequently associated with trees and bird guano [8]. C. neoformans and its sibling species, Cryptococcus gattii, are the primary cause of fungal meningitis worldwide [4,9]. C. neoformans primarily infects individuals with a low CD4+ T cell count [4], particularly patients with AIDS; C. gattii is more likely to infect immunocompetent individuals [10,11].
Infections begin via inhalation of desiccated C. neoformans cells or spores [12,13]. Human exposure to C. neoformans is predicted to be near universal, first occurring in early childhood [14]. In immunocompromised patients, C. neoformans may be completely cleared by the immune system, or persist asymptomatically for indefinite periods of time within granulomas [15,16]. C. neoformans is capable of operating as a facultative intracellular pathogen, and as such control of C. neoformans is reliant on robust cell-mediated immunity, characterized broadly by a T-helper 1 (Th1) profile [17]. This includes production of cytokines such as interleukin 12 (IL-12), interferon gamma (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and classically activated, or M1, skewing monocytes/macrophages [17]. T-helper 2 (Th2) associated responses, such as production of interleukin 33 (IL-33), (interleukin 13) IL-13, (interleukin 4) IL-4 cytokines, and eosinophilia, are generally considered to be detrimental [17]. Much effort is directed at working out the distinct mechanisms governing immunity to C. neoformans and the feasibility of vaccine development [17,18].
In immunocompromised individuals, either persistent or newly acquired C. neoformans can proliferate within the lungs and disseminate to basically any organ in the body. C. neoformans shows a particular predilection for the CNS, and is able to cross the blood–brain barrier to cause devastating meningitis. Cryptococcal meningitis causes approximately 15% of AIDS deaths annually [4]. Treatment is especially difficult because the central nervous system (CNS) stage of disease is both the presenting illness and the driver of mortality [9].
Although cryptococcal pneumonia does account for a potentially underdiagnosed disease burden [19,20], the most life-threatening presentation is cryptococcal meningitis [4]. Before C. neoformans can invade deeper tissues of the host, such as the CNS, it must first escape from the lungs. Additionally, the state of C. neoformans exiting the lungs can influence later stages in dissemination, such as transversal of the blood–brain barrier [21]. In this review, we explore processes leading to C. neoformans’s escape from the lungs and dissemination throughout the host.

2. Routes of Escape

There are two main routes by which C. neoformans is predicted to escape the lungs and invade deeper tissues (Figure 1). The first is an intracellular route within macrophages or other phagocytes migrating out from the lungs, known as the “Trojan horse” mechanism [21,22]. The second is the escape of extracellular C. neoformans cells. This could occur via transcytosis, when fungal cells pass directly through respiratory epithelial cells [23]. It could also occur after tissue damage allows for the passage of C. neoformans cells between epithelial cells, a process we will refer to as paracellular crossing [23].

2.1. Intracellular Escape

Among the first professional immune cells that C. neoformans encounters are resident alveolar macrophages and dendritic cells [24]. Interactions of C. neoformans with these patrolling phagocytic cells is key in determining the outcome of infection. Properly activated macrophages can be proficient at ingesting and destroying C. neoformans cells [25,26]. However, C. neoformans has a suite of traits that allow it to survive phagocytosis by macrophages and even proliferate within and escape from the phagolysosome. Additionally, macrophages could facilitate C. neoformans dissemination from the lungs and even transversal of the blood–brain barrier [22,27]. In order to use macrophages as a route of escape, C. neoformans must accomplish three important tasks: (1) entering the macrophage (phagocytosis), (2) surviving within the macrophage, and (3) escaping from the macrophage once outside the lung.

2.1.1. Phagocytosis

The first point, entrance into a macrophage or other phagocyte, seems straightforward: phagocytosis is a primary task for macrophages. However, C. neoformans is able to evade phagocytosis, particularly when it has not been opsonized by antibodies or complement [28]. Since many cryptococcosis patients are immunocompromised, the host antibody response could well be delayed, allowing for a period of fungal cell growth and/or formation of Titan cells (see Section 3.1) in the lungs. Experiments in zebrafish found that most C. neoformans cells are found outside macrophages at 2 h post-inoculation (hpi) but that almost >50% of fungal cells were found within macrophages at 24 hpi [29].
Phagocytosis evasion, sometimes called anti-phagocytosis, is heavily influenced by C. neoformans’s polysaccharide capsule, which cloaks the highly immunogenic cell wall. By mass, the capsule is comprised of ~90% glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), ~9–10% galactoxylomannan (GXMGal), and ~1% mannoproteins [30,31,32]. Unopsonized cells are rarely phagocytosed [28]: ~1% of RAW264.1 cells will associate with a cryptococcal cell in in vitro experiments [33]. When opsonized, that number increases to >20% [34]. Fungal cells without cell surface capsule are rapidly phagocytosed and destroyed [28]. In vivo imaging found that C. neoformans cells that were not phagocytosed 24 hpi had larger capsules than those that were phagocytosed [29].
GXM that is unattached to the fungal cell surface, or exo-GXM, is also known to accumulate in macrophages [35]. Since GXM inhibits a variety of phagocyte functions [36], accumulation of exo-GXM could serve as a method for suppressing macrophage activity during cryptococcal disease.
Phagocytosis evasion also functions independently from the cryptococcal cell capsule [33,37,38]. App1, a secreted protein involved in phagocytosis evasion by opsonized cells [38] binds to complement receptors CR2 and CR3, which can also serve as opsonins [39]. The molecular mechanisms underlying phagocytosis evasion by unopsonized cells are poorly understood, but likely involve multilayer transcriptional networks controlled by the master regulator Gat201 [33,37].

2.1.2. Intracellular Survival

Once C. neoformans has been phagocytosed, it must survive and replicate intracellularly. An important trait is C. neoformans’s ability to survive low pH environments [40]. This ability likely results from one of C. neoformans’s environmental niches: bird guano is acidic and rich in nitrogen. C. neoformans replicates more rapidly within tissue culture macrophages than in tissue culture medium itself [41], and is capable of lysing macrophages from within [24]. Phagolysosomes containing C. neoformans cells show an initial pH decrease to pH 4.7, which then increases to pH 5.3 [42]. A second recent report also indicates that the phagolysosome is not fully acidified [43], indicating some disruption to the phagolysosome. However, it appears to be more acidic than commonly seen when macrophages are infected with other pathogens that prevent full maturation of the phagolysosome, such as Legionella pneumophila [44]. This strategy of surviving low pH, rather than completely blocking acidification of the phagolysosome, could help maintain C. neoformans’s access to iron, as iron is bound to transferrin at neutral pH and cannot be utilized by invading microbes [42,45]. Additional evidence supporting the importance of C. neoformans’s affinity for low pH environments comes in the form of a secreted phospholipid modifying enzyme, phospholipase B1 (Plb1). Plb1 can be anchored to the cell wall or secreted into the extracellular milieu, and has an optimal activity in the acidic pH ranges of the phagosome [46,47,48]. Plb1 promotes survival in macrophages, and is required for efficient dissemination from the lungs [49,50].
Evaluation of phagosomal markers indicates that C. neoformans-containing phagosomes do undergo initial maturation. The early endosomal and phagosomal marker Rab5, which recruits later phagosome and phagolysosome proteins, is indeed found on C. neoformans-containing phagosomes. Rab5 and Rab11 rapidly disappear (<15 min) from these compartments in C. neoformans-infected cells compared to cells containing heat killed C. neoformans, in which Rab5 and Rab11 associate with the phagosome for longer than 120 min [43]. C. neoformans-containing phagosomes show increased permeabilization early in the maturation process [51,52,53].
The cell surface capsule is also necessary for cryptococcal cell survival following phagocytosis, as acapsular cells cannot replicate inside macrophages [24]. Some of this could be due to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species released by the host, as capsule protects against these insults [54]. However, the reactive oxygen burst produced by macrophages is weaker than the neutrophil burst [55]. Powerful microscopy work in the zebrafish model of cryptococcosis actually found that, following phagocytosis by macrophages, the size of the cell surface capsule decreases [29]. In addition, C. neoformans cells replicating within the phagolysosome release GXM that accumulates within cytoplasmic vesicles [51]. Since our work suggests that cell surface capsule size and unattached, or exo-GXM, is inversely correlated, exo-GXM could also play a role in C. neoformans survival within macrophages [56].
Cryptococcal survival within macrophages also depends on the macrophage’s activation state. C. neoformans can induce a Th2 immune response in the lungs [57]. This response is correlated with disease progression: a Th2 response, with induction of type 2 cytokines, correlates with a pulmonary infection [58,59]. In contrast, when a Th1 response is encouraged by infecting mice with a C. neoformans strain expressing the type 1 cytokine IFNγ, mice are protected against further infection and macrophages show an M1 polarization pattern [60]. Since C. neoformans cells are less efficiently killed by M2 than M1 polarized macrophages [25,26], controlling macrophage activation state could be a powerful strategy to promote fungal survival. Evidence suggests that a number of fungal factors, including urease [58,59] and the Hsp70 family protein Ssa1 [61] promote M2 polarization in macrophages.

2.1.3. Escape from Macrophages

C. neoformans can escape from macrophages through a nonlytic process called vomocytosis [62]. This escape ability is critical for the Trojan horse hypothesis of cryptococcal dissemination.
After phagocytosis, C. neoformans is engulfed in the phagosome. To escape, C. neoformans first permeabilizes the phagosome by an unknown mechanism [51,52]. Next, actin rapidly and transiently polymerizes in a cage-like structure around the phagosome [52]. Finally, the C. neoformans cell exits the macrophage. The actin nucleator proteins Arp2/3 are necessary for the rapid formation of the actin cage-like structures [52]. These cages might be a post-phagosome permeabilization attempt by the macrophage to inhibit C. neoformans cells’ escape, as inhibiting actin polymerization increases vomocytosis. Vomocytosis is also regulated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase), extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5), and pharmacological inhibition of ERK5 increases vomocytosis [63]. As vomocytosis increases, dissemination decreases, suggesting that there is a balance between too rapid an escape and spread to distal sites within the host [63].
C. neoformans cells can also transfer laterally between macrophages, lyse macrophages, and escape when a macrophage divides or fuses with another macrophage. These processes are all poorly understood, but are reviewed in [64,65].

2.2. Extracellular Escape

Another potential, but not mutually exclusive route of escape for C. neoformans, is the transversal of fungal cells across the lung mucosa and into the blood-stream or lymphatics. To accomplish this, C. neoformans cells need to subvert the barrier function of epithelial cells separating them from the pulmonary interstitial space and vasculature. This can be achieved through either tissue damage and paracellular crossing, or transcytosis across respiratory epithelial cells. In vitro characterization of C. neoformans with the A549 human alveolar cell line has demonstrated that C. neoformans can adhere to, enter, and also damage lung epithelial cells [23,66,67,68,69,70].
Multiple factors have been implicated in the ability of C. neoformans to adhere to respiratory epithelial cells, which requires interacting surface features of both C. neoformans and the epithelial cells. On the fungal side, adherence is likely mediated by capsule GXM, which binds to CD14 on epithelial cells [67,68]. This interaction can also result in the internalization of C. neoformans and epithelial cell lysis [67]. Live C. neoformans cells display increased adherence over dead C. neoformans cells, and only live cells induce epithelial cell lysis, indicating that C. neoformans plays an active role in entry [67,70]. The mannoprotein MP84 is also implicated in playing a role in the adherence of poorly encapsulated C. neoformans cells [69]. MP84 is a component of the capsule, but purified MP84 cannot competitively inhibit adherence of encapsulated C. neoformans, suggesting that GXM and MP84 engage epithelial cells via separate mechanisms [69].
In addition to its important role in interacting with macrophages, phospholipase B1 (Plb1) is implicated in promoting adhesion to A549 lung epithelial cells [70]. Although the precise mechanism is not yet determined, the phospholipase B function, and not the lysophospholipase, or lysophospholipase transacylase functions of the multifunctional Plb1 enzyme is suggested to be most important for promoting adherence [70].
Little is known about how C. neoformans might enter and transverse respiratory epithelial cells after adhesion, a process known as transcytosis [66,67]. Transcytosis also occurs when C. neoformans cells cross the blood–brain barrier [21]. However, the frequency and relevance of respiratory epithelial cell transcytosis during infection is unclear. If transcytosis of the lung epithelium does occur, one host factor that could play a role is annexin A2 (ANXA2). ANXA2 is a membrane binding protein that facilitates membrane fusion, and is thus important for vesicle trafficking and other related processes. ANXA2 is critical for both transcytosis of the brain endothelium and non-lytic exocytosis from macrophages [71,72,73]. Thus, it is possible that ANXA2 also mediates transcytosis of the lung epithelium. Another candidate protein that could facilitate transcytosis is EphA2. This tyrosine kinase receptor is necessary for C. neoformans cells’ ability to cross the blood–brain barrier [74] and the EPHA2 gene is expressed in lung tissue [75].
Respiratory epithelial cells are also capable of recognizing potential pathogens and initiating innate immune responses through the early production of cytokines and chemokines [7]. C. neoformans interactions with epithelial cells in vitro results in the secretion of the chemokines IL-8 and CXCL1, which recruit monocyte and neutrophils, and could provide an early signal for host-defense [7,68,76,77]. However, a recent in vivo study of pulmonary cryptococcosis shows that C. neoformans can induce potent IL-33 production from the lung epithelia, promoting non-protective Th2 responses [78]. Additionally, IL-33 production leads to a decrease in tight junction E-cadherin, which could disrupt intracellular barrier function and provide a potential paracellular route of escape for C. neoformans [78]. More work is required to determine the mechanisms by which inflammatory signals from the lung epithelium mediate containment or escape of pulmonary C. neoformans.

3. Examples of Fungal Factors Influencing Pulmonary Escape

In the following sections, we highlight selected fungal factors that are particularly important for disease progression and escaping the lungs.

3.1. Cell Morphology

After inhalation, C. neoformans is capable of dramatically enlarging its size via two main mechanisms that ward against early clearance by the immune system: (1) C. neoformans produces a polysaccharide surface capsule that can double the 5–10 μm diameter of a typical haploid yeast cell grown in vitro [32]. The production of surface capsule is critical for all stages of virulence, as acapsular variants are quickly cleared after murine inoculation [79,80] and are rarely seen in human patients [81]. The mechanisms governing capsule synthesis have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [30,31,32]; and (2) C. neoformans increases its cell body size, producing enormous Titan cells that measure up to 100 μm in diameter in extreme cases [82,83,84,85,86].
Titan cell formation is regulated by multiple environmental signals, including stimulation by mating pheromone [85] and host phospholipids [87], and signal transduction through G-coupled protein receptors [88]. The G-protein coupled receptors Gpr4 and Gpr5 are especially important, as deletion of both gpr4 and gpr5, (gpr4Δ/gpr5Δ) results in a severe deficiency in Titan cell formation [88,89]. The protein kinase A pathway also plays a role in regulating Titan cell formation through the pleiotropic, pH responsive transcription factor Rim101, since rim101Δ cells are severely deficient for Titan cell formation [90,91]. Titan cells exhibit thickened cell walls, and a denser capsule structure [82,83,84,85,86], which may contribute to their increased resistance to oxidative and nitrosative stresses [85,92], therapeutic antifungals [92], and phagocytosis [92,93]. Some of the anti-phagocytic effect is due to the sheer size of Titan cells. However, the presence of Titan cells can also protect smaller cells from phagocytosis, so there are likely other mechanisms at work [93].
Titan cells are polyploid, which is likely a mechanism to support their increased size [84,85,92]. Notably, Titan cells bud smaller haploid and aneuploid daughter cells, which can inherit some stress resistance from their mothers, demonstrating how Titan cells could support population level adaptation to host stresses [84,92].
Titan cells are implicated in establishing infection and progressing disease within the lungs. The Titan cell-deficient gpr4Δ/gpr5Δ mutant displays decreased virulence, reduced lung proliferation, and greatly reduced dissemination to the spleen and brain of infected mice [88,89]. Increased Titan cell formation is associated with detrimental lung eopsinohilia and general Th2 immune skewing [89]. In addition, C57BL/6 mice, which are prone to respond to C. neoformans with a strong Th2 profile, have more Titan cells in their lungs than CD1 mice, which trend towards Th1 immune responses [94]. The precise casual relationships behind these associations will require additional studies, although greater Th2 activation could be related to increased chitin content in Titan cell walls [95].
Median cell and capsule sizes vary by infected tissue [56,96,97]. Titan cells are rarely observed outside of the lungs, and cells found in the brain typically display smaller median cell diameter and capsule thickness than those in the lungs, suggesting that cell size could influence proclivity for dissemination [56,96,98]. We recently reported that median cell and capsule size decrease proportionally over time in the lungs of intranasally inoculated C57BL/6 mice, from around 30 µm early after inoculation, to approximately 10 µm late in infection [56]. Fungal proliferation in the lungs and the emergence of small cells coincided with extrapulmonary dissemination. Additionally, a mutant strain (liv7Δ) that exhibited a slower transition to smaller median cell size also disseminated at a reduced rate [56]. Importantly, both wild-type and liv7Δ cells showed equivalent lung fungal burden and cell size early after inoculation, indicating that the differences in dissemination were more likely due to altered disease progression than disease initiation [56].
As mentioned previously, phospholipaseB1 (Plb1) deficiency results in increased uptake by macrophages, reduced intracellular proliferation, and reduced dissemination [49,50]. Interestingly, C. neoformans cells lacking Plb1 (plb1Δ) form Titan cells at a greater rate than wild-type cells in vivo. plb1Δ cells even undergo Titan cell formation after phagocytosis by macrophages, although the latter phenomenon has not been directly observed in vivo [49]. These observations could contribute to the plb1Δ mutant’s poorer ability to disseminate from the lungs [49,50].
Dynamic changes in cell and capsule size are likely important features of establishing and progressing infection within the lungs. Robust escape from the lungs possibly involves balancing the proportion of larger cells, which provide protection and resiliency in the lungs, with smaller cells more capable of dissemination.

3.2. Age

The aging of C. neoformans cells within the lungs is a source of phenotypic variation that potentially enhances extrapulmonary dissemination [99]. C. neoformans aging can be categorized as chronological aging or replicative aging. Chronological age refers to the cumulative lifespan of a cell. Replicative age refers to the number of times a cell has divided. Similar to Titan cells, C. neoformans cells of increased replicative age are more resistant to clearance by the host, and thus may serve as a reservoir for fungal persistence, although older C. neoformans likely disseminate at a greater frequency than Titans [99]. Unlike the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the C. neoformans cell wall strengthens with replicative age, making them more resistant to a variety of stresses, including oxidative stress and therapeutic antifungals [100,101,102]. Additionally, replicative aging results in a proportional increase in both cell size and capsule [101,102], consistent with cell cycle regulation of capsule growth [103]. The increase in size also increases resistance to phagocytosis by macrophages [101,102].
Recent developments in the field of C. neoformans aging have implicated the conserved histone deacetylase Sir2 as a regulator of replicative life-span (RLS) [104]. Deletion of the sir2 gene (sir2∆) results in pleiotropic changes to the transcriptome and shortens median RLS by 33%. The sir2∆ mutant is hypovirulent in the intranasal, but not the intravenous murine infection model. Notably, mice still succumb to intranasal infection with the sir2∆ mutant, but median time to death is considerably delayed, suggesting that Sir2 may be an important disease progression factor influencing dissemination [104].

3.3. Melanin

In C. neoformans, melanin pigment is exported to the cell wall [105], where it provides protection against ultraviolet radiation and oxidative damage [106,107]. Melanin synthesis requires the enzyme laccase, and two adjacent laccase genes (lac1 and lac2) can be found within the C. neoformans genome [108]. Transcription of lac2 is significantly lower than lac1, and as such the greatest defects in melanization are seen when either lac1 or both lac1 and lac2 are disrupted [108].
Multiple studies have suggested that melanin is more important for dissemination and CNS infection than pulmonary infectivity [33,109,110]. Laccase deficient strains are hypovirulent, causing delayed death in intranasally inoculated animals [110], despite wild-type lung infectivity [109]. Reduced extrapulmonary fungal burden is observed after intranasal, but not intravenous inoculation with laccase deficient strains [109]. These data suggest that melanin plays an important role in dissemination from the lungs. Laccase activity of C. neoformans isolates from human patients correlate with high in vitro uptake by macrophages, increased in vivo and ex vivo survival in cerebrospinal fluid [111]. Thus, laccase could influence uptake and survival within macrophages, influencing intracellular dissemination.
A systematic gene deletion approach to identify C. neoformans genes involved in lung infectivity also did not identify lac1 or lac2 as being critical for early growth in the lungs [33]. In some cases, however, genes that reduced melanization also reduced lung infectivity. This leaves the possibility that melanin could play a role in lung infectivity in collaboration with redundant pathways [33].

3.4. Phosphate Acquisition

Phosphate is critical for numerous cellular functions. In C. neoformans, one particular area of interest is phosphate incorporation into inositol pyrophosphates. These metabolites have pleiotropic roles in cell physiology, including regulation of carbon source utilization and virulence factors [112,113,114]. Recent work points to phosphate acquisition playing a critical role in extrapulmonary dissemination [115]. Loss of Pho4 (pho4Δ), a transcription factor that regulates genes related to phosphate acquisition, results in sensitivity to both phosphate deprivation and alkaline pH [115,116]. In a murine inhalation model, the pho4Δ mutant exhibits a modest defect in pulmonary proliferation, a much more significant defect in dissemination to the brain, and remains below the limit of detection in the blood-stream [115]. Furthermore, proliferation at physiological pH (pH 7.3), in serum, and in peripheral blood monocytes co-culture is markedly reduced. These observations indicate that phosphate acquisition and alkaline pH stress tolerance is important for escaping the lungs via an extracellular or intracellular route [115].
The Rim101 pathway is also critical for responding to alkaline pH [91,117], but Pho4 and Rim101 seem to activate different gene networks [115,116,117]. Thus, Rim101 and Pho4 may respond to alkaline pH independently, with distinct effects on virulence [90,115]. While the pho4Δ mutant is hypovirulent, it still produces wild-type levels of capsule and melanin in vitro [115]. In contrast, the rim101Δ mutant displays a severe capsule attachment defect [117], but also a thickened cell wall that induces hyper-inflammatory pathology in the lungs [90,118].

3.5. Sphingolipids

Plasma membrane sphingolipids are involved in various cellular functions including signaling, lipid raft architecture, and general membrane stability [119]. Sphingolipids are antigenic, and can influence uptake of C. neoformans by macrophages [120,121], intracellular proliferation [122], and overall virulence [123].
A prominent example of a fungal sphingolipid regulating C. neoformans dissemination is the plasma membrane glycosphingolipid glucosylceramide (GlcCer). Glucosylceramide synthase, encoded by the gcs1 gene, is required for synthesis of GlcCer. The gcs1Δ mutant cannot grow at physiological pH, but can replicate within the acidic phagolysosome of macrophages, and is contained within lung granulomas upon intranasal inoculation of mice [121,124].
The inability of the gcs1Δ mutant to escape the lungs is likely due to important structural features of GlcCer itself. For instance, the smt1 gene encodes a sphingolipid C9 methyltransferase that is required for methylation of the GlcCer sphingosine backbone, a modification that distinguishes fungal GlcCer from mammalian GlcCer [125]. The smt1Δ mutant maintains a constant but contained presence in the lungs. Accumulation of de-methylated GlcCer and altered membrane organization of the smt1Δ mutant perhaps alter its ability to adapt to the host environment and progress disease [125]. In addition to the GlcCer methylation, the saturation state of position 8 of the GlcCer sphingosine backbone influences virulence. Deletion of the sld8 gene (sld8Δ), which is required for desaturation of GlcCer at sphingosine backbone position C8, results in the accumulation of saturated GlcCer [126]. Similar to the smt1Δ mutant, the sld8Δ mutant displays a delayed growth defect in the lungs. The sld8Δ mutant also shows no detectable dissemination to the brain, despite canonical virulence factors remaining intact [126]. Increased membrane permeability of the sld8Δ mutant renders it more sensitive to stresses, and in contrast to the gcs1Δ mutant, reduces intracellular proliferation rates [126].
While GlcCer appears to be overall more important for extracellular growth in the host at alkaline pH, inositol phosphosphingolipid biology seems to be critical for regulating intracellular growth at acidic pH [122,127]. In C. neoformans, the isc1 gene encodes inositol phosphosphingolipid-phospholipase C1, an enzyme that breaks down inositol sphingolipids. The isc1Δ mutant grows poorly at acidic pH, likely due to improper oligomerization of the Pma1 proton pump at the plasma membrane [127]. The isc1Δ mutant is slightly attenuated for lung proliferation, but shows very poor dissemination to the brain [122]. Notably, depletion of macrophages rescues neuro-dissemination of the isc1Δ mutant. This indicates that isc1 is important for surviving interactions with macrophages, but, in their absence, dissemination of extracellular isc1Δ mutant cells remains possible [122]. Sphingolipid biology highlights the importance of the facultative intracellular lifestyle in C. neoformans virulence: disrupting sphingolipid biology to reduce either intracellular or extracellular growth severely hampers extrapulmonary dissemination.

4. Conclusions

C. neoformans cells’ escape from the lungs is a critical transition from contained (pulmonary) cryptococcosis to advanced, disseminated disease. In the establishment disease phase, fungal cells must persist and replicate in the lungs. Mutants deficient in this stage will exhibit a complete or almost complete attenuation of disease. In contrast, mutants deficient in later stages, such as dissemination, will still cause pulmonary disease, and thus will have more subtle phenotypes. This framework was outlined for infections caused by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus [128], and is broadly applicable to additional fungal infections. Since cryptococcosis has distinct pulmonary and extra-pulmonary phases, identifying mutants deficient in different phases provides key insights into disease.
In this review, we emphasized fungal factors that influence escape from the lungs. As with any stage of pathogenesis, however, there is a balance between pathogen and host that determines the outcome of infection. In the case of C. neoformans, significantly weak or strong immune responses can result in disease [129]. The lungs are the initial site of infection, and the lung mucosa provides the first barrier against invasion, so the outcome of this interaction is critical in determining how immune responses develop and disease progresses [5].

5. Future Directions

Both direct epithelial barrier transversal of extracellular C. neoformans cells and “Trojan horse”-mediated transversal are possible mechanisms for escaping the lungs. However, the relative frequency of extracellular and intracellular dissemination from the lungs is unknown, and most studies characterizing extracellular crossing were performed in vitro. Both the blood and lymph present possible routes for dissemination. Detecting intracellular and extracellular C. neoformans in blood and lymph at different stages of infection could provide a clearer picture of the state of C. neoformans exiting the lungs. In the case of the Trojan horse model, it is also important to characterize the host cells carrying C. neoformans. Which cell-subtypes are acting as Trojan horses, and what are their migratory patterns from the lungs?
Mice are the most widely used animal model to study disseminated cryptococcosis, and have been of great benefit to the field. However, there are key differences between cryptococcosis in mice and humans that are likely to influence our understanding of pulmonary escape moving forward. Many strains of ostensibly immunocompetent (albeit inbred) laboratory mice succumb to lethal infection with C. neoformans, especially when using highly virulent members of the H99 lineage [130]. This is in contrast to most cases of disseminated cryptococcosis in human patients, where there is usually a clear underlying immunodeficiency. In the case of C. neoformans, it is most commonly low CD4+ T cell count due to HIV/AIDS [4]. This is important because the immune status of the host has broad impacts on pathogenesis, and pulmonary escape could occur differently in immunosuppressed vs. immunocompetent hosts. For example, reconstitution of B cells protects T and B cell deficient Rag1−/− mice against CNS dissemination, but not pulmonary fungal proliferation [131]. This is likely an important observation for human patients, such as T cell deficient HIV/AIDS patients, and even HIV negative patients with various B cell deficiencies [132]. Indeed, HIV negative cryptococcosis patients have fewer B cells that uninfected control patients [132]. Immunodeficiencies can also lead to imbalances that cause normally protective responses to overcompensate and lead to inflammatory mediated damage. Despite reduced lung eosinophil recruitment, Th2 lymphocyte deficient STAT6−/− mice reach endpoints more quickly than wild-type C57BL6/J mice, likely due to over compensatory neutrophil recruitment and excessive pulmonary inflammation [133]. Expanding the repertoire of cryptococcosis in immunodeficient mouse models is likely a powerful way to draw better parallels with the human lung environment leading to pulmonary escape.
Another feature of mouse models to consider is that commonly used strains of C. neoformans are able to progress directly from acute pulmonary infection to disseminated disease in laboratory mice, whereas, in humans, there is evidence supporting reactivation of persistent, asymptomatic C. neoformans in the lungs [16]. In contrast to mice, immunocompetent laboratory rats inoculated with C. neoformans maintain a persistent fungal burden for up to six months [15]. Steroid based immunosuppression leads C. neoformans proliferation and dissemination [15]. However, the genetic tools available for rats are lacking in comparison to mice. A reproducible mouse model of C. neoformans persistence, and reactivation post-immunosuppression would be of great benefit to the field. Such a model could potentially inform investigators of any differences in pulmonary escape following persistent versus acute infection.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Morgan A. Wambaugh for creating Figure 1. We would also like to thank Kyla Ost and Owen D. Jensen for their critical evaluation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Steven T. Denham and Jessica C. S. Brown wrote the paper. Work was supported by a startup grant from the Pathology Department at the University of Utah.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.; Pickersgill, D.A.; Després, V.R.; Pöschl, U. High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12814–12819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.R.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lortholary, O.; Poizat, G.; Zeller, V.; Neuville, S.; Boibieux, A.; Alvarez, M.; Dellamonica, P.; Botterel, F.; Dromer, F.; Chêne, G.; et al. Long-term outcome of AIDS-associated cryptococcosis in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2006, 20, 2183–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rajasingham, R.; Smith, R.M.; Park, B.J.; Jarvis, J.N.; Govender, N.P.; Chiller, T.M.; Denning, D.W.; Loyse, A.; Boulware, D.R. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiesner, D.L.; Klein, B.S. Lung epithelium: Barrier immunity to inhaled fungi and driver of fungal-associated allergic asthma. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 40, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Whitsett, J.A.; Alenghat, T. Respiratory epithelial cells orchestrate pulmonary innate immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 16, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Weitnauer, M.; Mijošek, V.; Dalpke, A.H. Control of local immunity by airway epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mitchell, T.G.; Castaneda, E.; Nielsen, K.; Wanke, B.; Lazera, M.S. Environmental niches for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. In Cryptococcus: From Human Pathogen to Model Yeast; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Armstrong-James, D.; Meintjes, G.; Brown, G.D. A neglected epidemic: Fungal infections in HIV/AIDs. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Fraser, J.A.; Doering, T.L.; Wang, Z.; Janbon, G.; Idnurm, A.; Bahn, Y.-S. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a019760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Byrnes, E.J., III.; Li, W.; Lewit, Y.; Ma, H.; Voelz, K.; Ren, P.; Carter, D.A.; Chaturvedi, V.; Bildfell, R.J.; May, R.C.; et al. Emergence and pathogenicity of highly virulent Cryptococcus gattii genotypes in the northwest united states. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. May, R.C.; Stone, N.R.H.; Wiesner, D.L.; Bicanic, T.; Nielsen, K. Cryptococcus: From environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 14, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ballou, E.R.; Johnston, S.A. The cause and effect of Cryptococcus interactions with the host. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 40, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Goldman, D.L.; Khine, H.; Abadi, J.; Lindenberg, D.J.; Pirofski, L.-A.; Niang, R.; Casadevall, A. Serologic evidence for Cryptococcus neoformans infection in early childhood. Pediatrics 2001, 107, e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Goldman, D.L.; Lee, S.C.; Mednick, A.J.; Montella, L.; Casadevall, A. Persistent Cryptococcus neoformans pulmonary infection in the rat is associated with intracellular parasitism, decreased inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, and altered antibody responsiveness to cryptococcal polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 832–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Janbon, G.; Dromer, F. Epidemiological evidence for dormant Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3204–3209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Gibson, J.F.; Johnston, S.A. Immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii during cryptococcosis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 78, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Caballero Van Dyke, M.C.; Wormley, F.L. A call to arms: Quest for a cryptococcal vaccine. Trends Microbiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chang, W.-C.; Tzao, C.; Hsu, H.-H.; Lee, S.-C.; Huang, K.-L.; Tung, H.-J.; Chen, C.-Y. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: Comparison of clinical and radiographic characteristics in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Chest 2006, 129, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shirley, R.M.; Baddley, J.W. Cryptococcal lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2009, 15, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tseng, H.-K.; Huang, T.-Y.; Wu, A.Y.-J.; Chen, H.-H.; Liu, C.-P.; Jong, A. How Cryptococcus interacts with the blood–brain barrier. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1669–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Charlier, C.; Nielsen, K.; Daou, S.; Brigitte, M.; Chretien, F.; Dromer, F. Evidence of a role for monocytes in dissemination and brain invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Taylor-Smith, L. Cryptococcus-epithelial interactions. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feldmesser, M.; Kress, Y.; Novikoff, P.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcus neoformans is a facultative intracellular pathogen in murine pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4225–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Müller, U.; Stenzel, W.; Köhler, G.; Werner, C.; Polte, T.; Hansen, G.; Schütze, N.; Straubinger, R.K.; Blessing, M.; McKenzie, A.N.J.; et al. IL-13 induces disease-promoting type 2 cytokines, alternatively activated macrophages and allergic inflammation during pulmonary infection of mice with Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Arora, S.; Olszewski, M.A.; Tsang, T.M.; McDonald, R.A.; Toews, G.B.; Huffnagle, G.B. Effect of cytokine interplay on macrophage polarization during chronic pulmonary infection with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1915–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Santiago-Tirado, F.H.; Onken, M.D.; Cooper, J.A.; Klein, R.S.; Doering, T.L. Trojan horse transit contributes to blood–brain barrier crossing of a eukaryotic pathogen. mBio 2017, 8, e02183-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bolaños, B.; Mitchell, T.G. Phagocytosis and killing of Cryptococcus neoformans by rat alveolar macrophages in the absence of serum. J. Leukocyte Biol. 1989, 46, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bojarczuk, A.; Miller, K.A.; Hotham, R.; Lewis, A.; Ogryzko, N.V.; Kamuyango, A.A.; Frost, H.; Gibson, R.H.; Stillman, E.; May, R.C.; et al. Cryptococcus neoformans intracellular proliferation and capsule size determines early macrophage control of infection. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zaragoza, O.; Rodrigues, M.L.; De Jesus, M.; Frases, S.; Dadachova, E.; Casadevall, A. The capsule of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 68, 133–216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Doering, T.L. How sweet it is! Cell wall biogenesis and polysaccharide capsule formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 223–247. [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Meara, T.R.; Alspaugh, J.A. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: A sword and a shield. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, O.W.; Chun, C.D.; Chow, E.D.; Chen, C.; Madhani, H.D.; Noble, S.M. Systematic genetic analysis of virulence in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Cell 2008, 135, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brown, J.C.S.; Madhani, H.D. Approaching the functional annotation of fungal virulence factors using cross-species genetic interaction profiling. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1003168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chang, Z.L.; Netski, D.; Thorkildson, P.; Kozel, T.R. Binding and internalization of glucuronoxylomannan, the major capsular polysaccharide of Cryptococcus neoformans, by murine peritoneal macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vecchiarelli, A.; Pericolini, E.; Gabrielli, E.; Kenno, S.; Perito, S.; Cenci, E.; Monari, C. Elucidating the immunological function of the Cryptococcus neoformans capsule. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chun, C.D.; Brown, J.C.S.; Madhani, H.D. A major role for capsule-independent phagocytosis-inhibitory mechanisms in mammalian infection by Cryptococcus neoformans. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Luberto, C.; Martinez-Mariño, B.; Taraskiewicz, D.; Bolaños, B.; Chitano, P.; Toffaletti, D.L.; Cox, G.M.; Perfect, J.R.; Hannun, Y.A.; Balish, E.; et al. Identification of app1 as a regulator of phagocytosis and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1080–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Stano, P.; Williams, V.; Villani, M.; Cymbalyuk, E.S.; Qureshi, A.; Huang, Y.; Morace, G.; Luberto, C.; Tomlinson, S.; Del Poeta, M. App1: An antiphagocytic protein that binds to complement receptors 3 and 2. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vogel, R.A. Primary isolation medium for Cryptococcus neoformans. Appl. Microbiol. 1969, 18, 1100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Diamond, R.D.; Bennett, J.E. Growth of Cryptococcus neoformans within human macrophages in vitro. Infect. Immun. 1973, 7, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Levitz, S.M.; Nong, S.-H.; Seetoo, K.F.; Harrison, T.S.; Speizer, R.A.; Simons, E.R. Cryptococcus neoformans resides in an acidic phagolysosome of human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Smith, L.M.; Dixon, E.F.; May, R.C. The fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans manipulates macrophage phagosome maturation. Cell. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Horwitz, M.A.; Maxfield, F.R. Legionella pneumophila inhibits acidification of its phagosome in human monocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1984, 99, 1936–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kronstad, J.W.; Hu, G.; Jung, W.H. An encapsulation of iron homeostasis and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chayakulkeeree, M.; Johnston, S.A.; Oei, J.B.; Lev, S.; Williamson, P.R.; Wilson, C.F.; Zuo, X.; Leal, A.L.; Vainstein, M.H.; Meyer, W.; et al. Sec14 is a specific requirement for secretion of phospholipase B1 and pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 80, 1088–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, S.C.; Wright, L.C.; Santangelo, R.T.; Muller, M.; Moran, V.R.; Kuchel, P.W.; Sorrell, T.C. Identification of extracellular phospholipase B, lysophospholipase, and acyltransferase produced by Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, S.C.; Wright, L.C.; Golding, J.C.; Sorrell, T.C. Purification and characterization of secretory phospholipase B, lysophospholipase and lysophospholipase/transacylase from a virulent strain of the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Biochem. J. 2000, 347, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Evans, R.J.; Li, Z.; Hughes, W.S.; Djordjevic, J.T.; Nielsen, K.; May, R.C. Cryptococcal phospholipase B1 is required for intracellular proliferation and control of titan cell morphology during macrophage infection. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Santangelo, R.; Zoellner, H.; Sorrell, T.; Wilson, C.; Donald, C.; Djordjevic, J.; Shounan, Y.; Wright, L. Role of extracellular phospholipases and mononuclear phagocytes in dissemination of cryptococcosis in a murine model. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2229–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tucker, S.C.; Casadevall, A. Replication of Cryptococcus neoformans in macrophages is accompanied by phagosomal permeabilization and accumulation of vesicles containing polysaccharide in the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3165–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Johnston, S.A.; May, R.C. The human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans escapes macrophages by a phagosome emptying mechanism that is inhibited by Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerisation. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Davis, M.J.; Eastman, A.J.; Qiu, Y.; Gregorka, B.; Kozel, T.R.; Osterholzer, J.J.; Curtis, J.L.; Swanson, J.A.; Olszewski, M.A. Cryptococcus neoformans-induced macrophage lysosome damage crucially contributes to fungal virulence. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 2219–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zaragoza, O.; Chrisman, C.J.; Castelli, M.V.; Frases, S.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Rodríguez-Tudela, J.L.; Casadevall, A. Capsule enlargement in Cryptococcus neoformans confers resistance to oxidative stress suggesting a mechanism for intracellular survival. Cell. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2043–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nordenfelt, P.; Tapper, H. Phagosome dynamics during phagocytosis by neutrophils. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2011, 90, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Denham, S.T.; Verma, S.; Reynolds, R.C.; Worne, C.L.; Daugherty, J.M.; Lane, T.E.; Brown, J.C.S. Regulated release of cryptococcal polysaccharide drives virulence and suppresses immune infiltration into the central nervous system. Infect. Immun. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Huffnagle, G.B. Role of cytokines in T cell immunity to a pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Neurosignals 1996, 5, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Osterholzer, J.J.; Surana, R.; Milam, J.E.; Montano, G.T.; Chen, G.-H.; Sonstein, J.; Curtis, J.L.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Toews, G.B.; Olszewski, M.A. Cryptococcal urease promotes the accumulation of immature dendritic cells and a non-protective T2 immune response within the lung. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 932–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Murdock, B.J.; Teitz-Tennenbaum, S.; Chen, G.-H.; Dils, A.J.; Malachowski, A.N.; Curtis, J.L.; Olszewski, M.A.; Osterholzer, J.J. Early or late IL-10 blockade enhances TH1 and TH17 effector reponses and promotes fungal clearance in mice with cryptococcal lung infection. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 4107–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hardison, S.E.; Ravi, S.; Wozniak, K.L.; Young, M.L.; Olszewski, M.A.; Wormley, F.L. Pulmonary infection with an interferon-γ-producing Cryptococcus neoformans strain results in classical macrophage activation and protection. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Eastman, A.J.; He, X.; Qiu, Y.; Davis, M.J.; Vedula, P.; Lyons, D.M.; Park, Y.-D.; Hardison, S.E.; Malachowski, A.N.; Osterholzer, J.J.; et al. Cryptococcal heat shock protein 70 homolog ssa1 contributes to pulmonary expansion of Cryptococcus neoformans during the afferent phase of the immune response by promoting macrophage M2 polarization. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5999–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nicola, A.M.; Robertson, E.J.; Albuquerque, P.; Derengowski, L.D.S.; Casadevall, A. Nonlytic exocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans from macrophages occurs in vivo and is influenced by phagosomal PH. mBio 2011, 2, e00167-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gilbert, A.S.; Seoane, P.I.; Sephton-Clark, P.; Bojarczuk, A.; Hotham, R.; Giurisato, E.; Sarhan, A.R.; Hillen, A.; Velde, G.V.; Gray, N.S.; et al. Vomocytosis of live pathogens from macrophages is regulated by the atypical map kinase ERK5. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. García-Rodas, R.; Zaragoza, O. Catch me if you can: Phagocytosis and killing avoidance by Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 64, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Johnston, S.A.; May, R.C. Cryptococcus interactions with macrophages: Evasion and manipulation of the phagosome by a fungal pathogen. Cell. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rodrigues, M.L.; Fonseca, F.L.; Frases, S.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L. The still obscure attributes of cryptococcal glucuronoxylomannan. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Barbosa, F.M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Holandino, C.; Alviano, C.S.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. Glucuronoxylomannan-mediated interaction of Cryptococcus neoformans with human alveolar cells results in fungal internalization and host cell damage. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Barbosa, F.M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Figueiredo, R.T.; Bozza, M.T.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. Binding of glucuronoxylomannan to the CD14 receptor in human A549 alveolar cells induces interleukin-8 production. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Teixeira, P.A.C.; Penha, L.L.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; Previato, J.O. Mannoprotein MP84 mediates the adhesion of Cryptococcus neoformans to epithelial lung cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ganendren, R.; Carter, E.; Sorrell, T.; Widmer, F.; Wright, L. Phospholipase b activity enhances adhesion of Cryptococcus neoformans to a human lung epithelial cell line. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Stukes, S.; Coelho, C.; Rivera, J.; Jedlicka, A.E.; Hajjar, K.A.; Casadevall, A. The membrane phospholipid binding protein annexin A2 promotes phagocytosis and non-lytic exocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans and impacts survival in fungal infection. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 1252–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Na Pombejra, S.; Salemi, M.; Phinney, B.S.; Gelli, A. The metalloprotease, Mpr1, engages annexin A2 to promote the transcytosis of fungal cells across the blood–brain barrier. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fang, W.; Fa, Z.-Z.; Xie, Q.; Wang, G.-Z.; Yi, J.; Zhang, C.; Meng, G.-X.; Gu, J.-L.; Liao, W.-Q. Complex roles of annexin A2 in host blood–brain barrier invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2017, 23, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Aaron, P.A.; Jamklang, M.; Uhrig, J.P.; Gelli, A. The blood–brain barrier internalises Cryptococcus neoformans via the epha2-tyrosine kinase receptor. Cell. Microbiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjöstedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 2017, 357, eaan2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Guillot, L.; Carroll, S.F.; Homer, R.; Qureshi, S.T. Enhanced innate immune responsiveness to pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection is associated with resistance to progressive infection. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 4745–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Guillot, L.; Carroll, S.F.; Badawy, M.; Qureshi, S.T. Cryptococcus neoformans induces IL-8 secretion and CXCl1 expression by human bronchial epithelial cells. Respir. Res. 2008, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Heyen, L.; Müller, U.; Siegemund, S.; Schulze, B.; Protschka, M.; Alber, G.; Piehler, D. Lung epithelium is the major source of IL-33 and is regulated by IL-33-dependent and IL-33-independent mechanisms in pulmonary cryptococcosis. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chang, Y.C.; Cherniak, R.; Kozel, T.R.; Granger, D.L.; Morris, L.C.; Weinhold, L.C.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Structure and biological activities of acapsular Cryptococcus neoformans 602 complemented with the cap64 gene. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 1584–1592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Chang, Y.C.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Isolation of the third capsule-associated gene, cap60, required for virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 2230–2236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Mahajan, K.R.; Roberts, A.L.; Curtis, M.T.; Fortuna, D.; Dharia, R.; Sheehan, L. Diagnostic challenges of Cryptococcus neoformans in an immunocompetent individual masquerading as chronic hydrocephalus. Case Rep. Neurol. Med. 2016, 2016, 7. [Google Scholar]
  82. Cruickshank, J.G.; Cavill, R.; Jelbert, M. Cryptococcus neoformans of unusual morphology. Appl. Microbiol. 1973, 25, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Feldmesser, M.; Kress, Y.; Casadevall, A. Dynamic changes in the morphology of Cryptococcus neoformans during murine pulmonary infection. Microbiology 2001, 147, 2355–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zaragoza, O.; García-Rodas, R.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Rodríguez-Tudela, J.L.; Casadevall, A. Fungal cell gigantism during mammalian infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Okagaki, L.H.; Strain, A.K.; Nielsen, J.N.; Charlier, C.; Baltes, N.J.; Chrétien, F.; Heitman, J.; Dromer, F.; Nielsen, K. Cryptococcal cell morphology affects host cell interactions and pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, J.-M.; Zhou, Q.; Cai, H.-R.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Xin, X.-Y.; Meng, F.-Q.; Wang, Y.-P. Clinicopathological features of pulmonary cryptococcosis with cryptococcal titan cells: A comparative analysis of 27 cases. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 4837–4846. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Chrisman, C.J.; Albuquerque, P.; Guimaraes, A.J.; Nieves, E.; Casadevall, A. Phospholipids trigger Cryptococcus neoformans capsular enlargement during interactions with amoebae and macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Okagaki, L.H.; Wang, Y.; Ballou, E.R.; O’Meara, T.R.; Bahn, Y.-S.; Alspaugh, J.A.; Xue, C.; Nielsen, K. Cryptococcal titan cell formation is regulated by G-protein signaling in response to multiple stimuli. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Crabtree, J.N.; Okagaki, L.H.; Wiesner, D.L.; Strain, A.K.; Nielsen, J.N.; Nielsen, K. Titan cell production enhances the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 3776–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. O’Meara, T.R.; Holmer, S.M.; Selvig, K.; Dietrich, F.; Alspaugh, J.A. Cryptococcus neoformans rim101 is associated with cell wall remodeling and evasion of the host immune responses. mBio 2013, 4, e00522-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ost, K.S.; O’Meara, T.R.; Huda, N.; Esher, S.K.; Alspaugh, J.A. The Cryptococcus neoformans alkaline response pathway: Identification of a novel rim pathway activator. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gerstein, A.C.; Fu, M.S.; Mukaremera, L.; Li, Z.; Ormerod, K.L.; Fraser, J.A.; Berman, J.; Nielsen, K. Polyploid titan cells produce haploid and aneuploid progeny to promote stress adaptation. mBio 2015, 6, e01340-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Okagaki, L.H.; Nielsen, K. Titan cells confer protection from phagocytosis in Cryptococcus neoformans infections. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. García-Barbazán, I.; Trevijano-Contador, N.; Rueda, C.; de Andrés, B.; Pérez-Tavárez, R.; Herrero-Fernández, I.; Gaspar, M.L.; Zaragoza, O. The formation of titan cells in Cryptococcus neoformans depends on the mouse strain and correlates with induction of Th2-type responses. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wiesner, D.L.; Specht, C.A.; Lee, C.K.; Smith, K.D.; Mukaremera, L.; Lee, S.T.; Lee, C.G.; Elias, J.A.; Nielsen, J.N.; Boulware, D.R.; et al. Chitin recognition via chitotriosidase promotes pathologic type-2 helper T cell responses to cryptococcal infection. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xie, S.; Sao, R.; Braun, A.; Bottone, E.J. Difference in Cryptococcus neoformans cellular and capsule size in sequential pulmonary and meningeal infection: A postmortem study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 73, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Charlier, C.; Chrétien, F.; Baudrimont, M.; Mordelet, E.; Lortholary, O.; Dromer, F. Capsule structure changes associated with Cryptococcus neoformans crossing of the blood–brain barrier. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 166, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rivera, J.; Feldmesser, M.; Cammer, M.; Casadevall, A. Organ-dependent variation of capsule thickness in Cryptococcus neoformans during experimental murine infection. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5027–5030. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Bouklas, T.; Fries, B.C. Aging as an emergent factor that contributes to phenotypic variation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet. Biol. FG B 2015, 78, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Powell, C.D.; Quain, D.E.; Smart, K.A. Chitin scar breaks in aged saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 2003, 149, 3129–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Bouklas, T.; Pechuan, X.; Goldman, D.L.; Edelman, B.; Bergman, A.; Fries, B.C. Old Cryptococcus neoformans cells contribute to virulence in chronic cryptococcosis. mBio 2013, 4, e00455-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jain, N.; Cook, E.; Xess, I.; Hasan, F.; Fries, D.; Fries, B.C. Isolation and characterization of senescent Cryptococcus neoformans and implications for phenotypic switching and pathogenesis in chronic cryptococcosis. Eukaryot. Cell 2009, 8, 858–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. García-Rodas, R.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Trevijano-Contador, N.; Janbon, G.; Moyrand, F.; Casadevall, A.; Zaragoza, O. Capsule growth in Cryptococcus neoformans is coordinated with cell cycle progression. mBio 2014, 5, e00945-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bouklas, T.; Jain, N.; Fries, B.C. Modulation of replicative lifespan in Cryptococcus neoformans: Implications for virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Coelho, C.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcal therapies and drug targets: The old, the new and the promising. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Eisenman, H.C.; Casadevall, A. Synthesis and assembly of fungal melanin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Liu, G.Y.; Nizet, V. Color me bad: Microbial pigments as virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pukkila-Worley, R.; Gerrald, Q.D.; Kraus, P.R.; Boily, M.-J.; Davis, M.J.; Giles, S.S.; Cox, G.M.; Heitman, J.; Alspaugh, J.A. Transcriptional network of multiple capsule and melanin genes governed by the Cryptococcus neoformans cyclic amp cascade. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Noverr, M.C.; Williamson, P.R.; Fajardo, R.S.; Huffnagle, G.B. CNLAC1 is required for extrapulmonary dissemination of Cryptococcus neoformans but not pulmonary persistence. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Salas, S.D.; Bennett, J.E.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Perfect, J.R.; Williamson, P.R. Effect of the laccase gene CNLAC1, on virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sabiiti, W.; Robertson, E.; Beale, M.A.; Johnston, S.A.; Brouwer, A.E.; Loyse, A.; Jarvis, J.N.; Gilbert, A.S.; Fisher, M.C.; Harrison, T.S.; et al. Efficient phagocytosis and laccase activity affect the outcome of HIV-associated cryptococcosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2000–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Lev, S.; Li, C.; Desmarini, D.; Saiardi, A.; Fewings, N.L.; Schibeci, S.D.; Sharma, R.; Sorrell, T.C.; Djordjevic, J.T. Fungal inositol pyrophosphate IP7 is crucial for metabolic adaptation to the host environment and pathogenicity. mBio 2015, 6, e00531-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, C.; Lev, S.; Desmarini, D.; Kaufman-Francis, K.; Saiardi, A.; Silva, A.P.G.; Mackay, J.P.; Thompson, P.E.; Sorrell, T.C.; Djordjevic, J.T. Ip3-4 kinase Arg1 regulates cell wall homeostasis and surface architecture to promote clearance of Cryptococcus neoformans infection in a mouse model. Virulence 2017, 8, 1833–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Li, C.; Lev, S.; Saiardi, A.; Desmarini, D.; Sorrell, T.C.; Djordjevic, J.T. Identification of a major IP5 kinase in Cryptococcus neoformans confirms that PP-IP5/IP7, not IP6, is essential for virulence. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lev, S.; Kaufman-Francis, K.; Desmarini, D.; Juillard, P.G.; Li, C.; Stifter, S.A.; Feng, C.G.; Sorrell, T.C.; Grau, G.E.R.; Bahn, Y.-S.; et al. Pho4 is essential for dissemination of Cryptococcus neoformans to the host brain by promoting phosphate uptake and growth at alkaline PH. mSphere 2017, 2, e00381-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Toh-e, A.; Ohkusu, M.; Li, H.-M.; Shimizu, K.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Gonoi, T.; Kawamoto, S.; Kanesaki, Y.; Yoshikawa, H.; Nishizawa, M. Identification of genes involved in the phosphate metabolism in Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 80, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. O’Meara, T.R.; Norton, D.; Price, M.S.; Hay, C.; Clements, M.F.; Nichols, C.B.; Alspaugh, J.A. Interaction of Cryptococcus neoformans rim101 and protein kinase a regulates capsule. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Ost, K.S.; Esher, S.K.; Leopold Wager, C.M.; Walker, L.; Wagener, J.; Munro, C.; Wormley, F.L.; Alspaugh, J.A. Rim pathway-mediated alterations in the fungal cell wall influence immune recognition and inflammation. mBio 2017, 8, e02290-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Singh, A.; MacKenzie, A.; Girnun, G.; Del Poeta, M. Analysis of sphingolipids, sterols, and phospholipids in human pathogenic Cryptococcus strains. J. Lipid Res. 2017, 58, 2017–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. McQuiston, T.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. Role of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and S1P receptor 2 in the phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans by alveolar macrophages. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1416–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. McQuiston, T.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. Role of host sphingosine kinase 1 in the lung response against cryptococcosis. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 2342–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Shea, J.M.; Kechichian, T.B.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. The cryptococcal enzyme inositol phosphosphingolipid-phospholipase c confers resistance to the antifungal effects of macrophages and promotes fungal dissemination to the central nervous system. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 5977–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Farnoud, A.M.; Bryan, A.M.; Kechichian, T.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. The granuloma response controlling cryptococcosis in mice depends on the sphingosine kinase 1–sphingosine 1-phosphate pathway. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 2705–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Rittershaus, P.C.; Kechichian, T.B.; Allegood, J.C.; Merrill, A.H.; Hennig, M.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. Glucosylceramide synthase is an essential regulator of pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Singh, A.; Wang, H.; Silva, L.C.; Na, C.; Prieto, M.; Futerman, A.H.; Luberto, C.; Del Poeta, M. Methylation of glycosylated sphingolipid modulates membrane lipid topography and pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Cell. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 500–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Raj, S.; Nazemidashtarjandi, S.; Kim, J.; Joffe, L.; Zhang, X.; Singh, A.; Mor, V.; Desmarini, D.; Djordjevic, J.; Raleigh, D.P.; et al. Changes in glucosylceramide structure affect virulence and membrane biophysical properties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Biomembranes 2017, 1859, 2224–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Farnoud, A.M.; Mor, V.; Singh, A.; Del Poeta, M. Inositol phosphosphingolipid phospholipase c1 regulates plasma membrane atpase (pma1) stability in Cryptococcus neoformans. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 3932–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Beattie, S.R.; Mark, K.M.K.; Thammahong, A.; Ries, L.N.A.; Dhingra, S.; Caffrey-Carr, A.K.; Cheng, C.; Black, C.C.; Bowyer, P.; Bromley, M.J.; et al. Filamentous fungal carbon catabolite repression supports metabolic plasticity and stress responses essential for disease progression. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Pirofski, L.-A.; Casadevall, A. Immune-mediated damage completes the parabola: Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis can reflect the outcome of a weak or strong immune response. mBio 2017, 8, e02063-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Janbon, G.; Ormerod, K.L.; Paulet, D.; Byrnes, E.J., III.; Yadav, V.; Chatterjee, G.; Mullapudi, N.; Hon, C.-C.; Billmyre, R.B.; Brunel, F.; et al. Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. Grubii reveals complex rna expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Dufaud, C.; Rivera, J.; Rohatgi, S.; Pirofski, L.-A. Naïve B cells reduce fungal dissemination in Cryptococcus neoformans infected Rag1−/− mice. Virulence 2018, 9, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Rohatgi, S.; Nakouzi, A.; Carreño, L.J.; Slosar-Cheah, M.; Kuniholm, M.H.; Wang, T.; Pappas, P.G.; Pirofski, L.-A. Antibody and B cell subset perturbations in human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected patients with cryptococcosis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofx255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wiesner, D.L.; Smith, K.D.; Kashem, S.W.; Bohjanen, P.R.; Nielsen, K. Different lymphocyte populations direct dichotomous eosinophil or neutrophil responses to pulmonary Cryptococcus infection. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 04 00025 g001 550
Figure 1. Processes leading to pulmonary escape by C. neoformans. (1) Fungal factors influencing pulmonary escape: Proliferation within the lungs results in phenotypic diversity. Cell body, cell wall, and capsule enlargement promote adaptation to host stresses, and evasion of the host immune system. This reservoir of resilient cells may generate smaller cells with a greater propensity for dissemination. (2) Phagocytosis: Smaller, less encapsulated cells are more easily phagocytosed, especially with the aid of opsonization. (3) Intracellular survival: C. neoformans is able to survive and replicate within the phagolysosome of host phagocytes, such as macrophages. Macrophages containing C. neoformans act as “Trojan horses” to carry fungal cells across the respiratory epithelium. (4) Escape from macrophages: Macrophages can carry C. neoformans to distal sites, such as the brain microvasculature. C. neoformans can escape from macrophages at unknown stages in dissemination via nonlytic exocytosis, or vomocytosis. Here, we show vomocytosis occurring within an alveolar-associated capillary, but it could potentially take place at multiple sites within the body, including the blood–brain barrier. (5) Extracellular escape: C. neoformans also has the potential to escape the lungs independent of macrophages. After adhering to the respiratory epithelium, C. neoformans may cross through epithelial cells in a process called transcytosis. Lysis of epithelial cells and/or disruption of epithelial cell tight junctions could allow for C. neoformans to cross in between epithelial cells (paracellular crossing). Blood-borne extracellular C. neoformans must adapt to alkaline physiological pH (pH 7.3).
Figure 1. Processes leading to pulmonary escape by C. neoformans. (1) Fungal factors influencing pulmonary escape: Proliferation within the lungs results in phenotypic diversity. Cell body, cell wall, and capsule enlargement promote adaptation to host stresses, and evasion of the host immune system. This reservoir of resilient cells may generate smaller cells with a greater propensity for dissemination. (2) Phagocytosis: Smaller, less encapsulated cells are more easily phagocytosed, especially with the aid of opsonization. (3) Intracellular survival: C. neoformans is able to survive and replicate within the phagolysosome of host phagocytes, such as macrophages. Macrophages containing C. neoformans act as “Trojan horses” to carry fungal cells across the respiratory epithelium. (4) Escape from macrophages: Macrophages can carry C. neoformans to distal sites, such as the brain microvasculature. C. neoformans can escape from macrophages at unknown stages in dissemination via nonlytic exocytosis, or vomocytosis. Here, we show vomocytosis occurring within an alveolar-associated capillary, but it could potentially take place at multiple sites within the body, including the blood–brain barrier. (5) Extracellular escape: C. neoformans also has the potential to escape the lungs independent of macrophages. After adhering to the respiratory epithelium, C. neoformans may cross through epithelial cells in a process called transcytosis. Lysis of epithelial cells and/or disruption of epithelial cell tight junctions could allow for C. neoformans to cross in between epithelial cells (paracellular crossing). Blood-borne extracellular C. neoformans must adapt to alkaline physiological pH (pH 7.3).
Jof 04 00025 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Denham, S.T.; Brown, J.C.S. Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010025

AMA Style

Denham ST, Brown JCS. Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Denham, Steven T., and Jessica C. S. Brown. 2018. "Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop