Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
High Power Laser Facilities at the Kansai Photon Science Institute
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Neutron Scattering at HIFAR—Glimpses of the Past
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Neutron Sources at the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
Quantum Beam Sci. 2017, 1(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs1010006
Submission received: 11 January 2017 / Revised: 23 March 2017 / Accepted: 28 March 2017 / Published: 21 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Collection Facilities)

Abstract

:
The IBR-2 reactor and IREN facility are the two main neutron sources at the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics. This contribution presents data on the IBR-2 reactor parameters before and after modernization. The general schemes of the IBR-2 reactor as well as of the IREN facility are presented.

1. Introduction

The Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), which was established in 1956, is a partnership of 18 countries committed to the goal of collective performance of theoretical studies, building and operating of the world’s leading facilities for research in condensed matter physics, nuclear physics and elementary particle physics. The two main JINR neutron sources—the fast pulsed reactor IBR-2 and the intense resonance neutron source (IREN—are operated by the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics (FLNP), one of the seven JINR laboratories.

2. IBR-2 Reactor

The IBR-2—a powerful high-flux pulsed reactor of periodic operation—was put in operation in 1984 at a mean power of 2 MW [1,2]. In 2007, the reactor reached the service life limit on fuel burn-up and fluence on the reactor vessel and was shut down for modernization and replacement of the primary reactor equipment. The main objectives of the modernization were to increase the safety, reliability and experimental possibilities of the reactor for the next 25 years of operation [3]. By 2010 the installation of new equipment was completed and was followed by a successful power startup. The IBR-2 parameters before and after modernization are presented in Table 1.
The main parts of the reactor are shown schematically in Figure 1. The reactor core is an irregular hexagon composed of fuel element subassemblies. Plutonium dioxide pellets are used as a reactor fuel. The cooling system has three circuits and two loops. The IBR-2 is a sodium-cooled fast neutron reactor. The core is installed in a double-walled steel vessel and surrounded by a number of stationary reflectors, control and safety units among them, as well as water moderators serving 14 horizontal beam lines. Water moderators of the reactor thermalize fast neutrons down to a thermal energy range used by experimenters on the extracted neutron beams.
A unique feature of the reactor is the periodic modulation of reactivity, which is accomplished by the rotation of the main moveable reflector and the auxiliary moveable reflector near the core (Figure 2). The rotors of the main and auxiliary movable reflectors rotate in opposite directions with different velocities. At a frequency of 5 Hz the reactor is brought from a deep subcritical state to a prompt supercritical one. A power pulse is generated at the moment when both reflectors approach the core [1,2,4].
After modernization of the IBR-2 reactor a pelletized moderator based on aromatic hydrocarbons was installed. The main advantages of the moderator based on aromatic hydrocarbons include: low radiolytic hydrogen release, no danger of explosion, obtaining of a cold neutron yield, comparable to that of liquid hydrogen, cheap to develop and safe to operate. Use of this type of moderator allows a substantial reduction in the moderator temperature. A small fraction of the pellets can be periodically discharged and replaced, permitting continuous, arbitrarily long operation of the moderator system [5]. IBR-2 cycles (approximately 2500 h of operation per year) are usually carried out either in the water or cryogenic mode.
The period of reactor modernization was simultaneously used also for upgrading the existing facilities and creating the new ones, which made it possible to increase the number of operating spectrometers from 11 to 14 and to significantly extend the experimental capacities and areas of research carried out (Table 2) [6]. At present, a suite of 13 high-performance instruments (diffractometers, small-angle scattering instruments, reflectometers, inelastic scattering spectrometers) are available for experiments in the framework of the FLNP user program (Figure 3). More than 200 experiments are conducted at the reactor annually by scientists from more than 15 countries. Two other new instruments (a new stress diffractometer and a facility for neutron imaging) are presently under construction. A high fluence irradiation facility for radiation hardness studies and a neutron activation analysis setup are also available for research.
The IBR-2 complex of spectrometers allows one to conduct a wide range of interdisciplinary research in the fields of condensed matter physics, materials science, chemistry, biology, geophysics, pharmacology, medicine, nuclear physics, ecology, etc.
Recently, a new iron oxide, Fe4O5, which can presumably exist in the layers of the Earth’s upper mantle, has been synthesized under the combined effect of high pressures and temperatures. A comprehensive study of its physical properties, as well as its atomic and magnetic structure using neutron diffraction techniques at the IBR-2 reactor, has revealed a new type of charge-ordering state with the formation of dimeric and trimeric electronic states in this compound (Figure 4) [20].
To improve the performance of lithium batteries, a series of experiments on neutron reflectometry (GRAINS reflectometer) to study the electrochemical interfaces of liquid electrolyte/solid electrode have been carried out. From the specular reflectivity analysis, the formation of a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the surface of the electrode (Cu) has been concluded, and the lithium electrodeposition and growth of parasitic dendritic structures during the operation of an electrochemical cell have been tracked [21].

3. IREN Facility

The IREN facility is an intense resonance neutron source developed for fundamental and applied investigations in neutron nuclear physics by precision neutron spectroscopy methods in a neutron energy range from eV to hundreds of keV. The IREN is based on an electron linear accelerator (LUE-200) with an S-band traveling wave accelerating structure. A massive target made of a material with a high atomic number (tungsten or uranium) serves as a source of neutrons. The electron beam produced by the LUE-200 linear electron accelerator hits the target and undergoes a conversion into neutrons (e-γ-n reaction). A conceptual diagram of the facility is shown in Figure 5.
The LINAC proposed by the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, consists of a pulsed electron gun, an accelerating system, a radio frequency (RF) power supply system based on 10-cm-range klystrons with modulators, and a beam focusing and transport system including a wide aperture magnetic spectrometer and a vacuum system. The accelerator is positioned vertically inside a three-story building. The LUE-200 electron source is a 2electrode electron gun with Ø 12-mm oxide thermocathode. The cathode is fed by a 200 kV pulsed transformer. The anode is the wall of the vacuum chamber with a hole 43 mm in diameter closed with a wire frame made of stainless steel. The electron gun provides a pulsed electron beam with an 8 A peak current, 250–300 ns duration, 50 Hz repetition rate and ≤0.01π cm·mrad emittance. The accelerating system consists of an RF buncher and two short (3 m long) accelerating sections with a high acceleration rate. The accelerating section represents a circular blinded waveguide with constant impedance fed by the RF power. The RF power comes from klystrons—RF power amplifiers of a 10 cm frequency range (2856 MHz). The electron beam is focused by three short solenoidal magnetic lenses installed between the electron gun and the RF buncher. To measure the spectra of accelerated electrons, a broadband magnetostatic analyzer with a magnetic field perpendicular to the beam direction is used. A magnetic E-core with a variable magnetic rigidity of 0.166–0.7 T·m is placed after the second section. The electron beam in the spectrometer magnetic field is turned up to 90° and extracted from the spectrometer vacuum chamber through a 50 µm stainless steel window [22]. The neutron-producing target is made of tungsten-based alloy and represents a cylinder 40 mm in diameter and 100 mm in height housed within an aluminum can 160 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height. Distilled water is circulated inside the can, providing target cooling and neutron moderation. The thickness of the water layer in a radial direction is 50 mm. Time-of-flight measurements can be performed simultaneously on seven neutron beamlines. Several measurement stations are installed at different (10, 30, 50, 60, 85, 120, 250 and 500 m) distances along the flight paths. By the end of 2008, the first stage of the IREN facility comprising one accelerating section had been completed. The design parameters and parameters of the first and second stages are given in Table 3. During 2009–2015, the facility operated for physical experiments in the trial operation mode along with the ongoing modernization of some units and components of the accelerator. At the end of 2015, the second accelerating section with a new klystron and modulator was installed. At present, the facility composed of two accelerating sections is being adjusted and tested. The klystron technical parameters do not allow obtaining high electron energies and working with frequencies higher than 50 Hz.
The main research activities of the IREN facility include:
  • Studies of T-odd, P-odd and P-even effects in the (n, γ), (n, p), (n, α) reactions in the resonance neutron energy range;
  • Studies of characteristics and correlations in the emission of neutrons, gamma quanta and light-charged particles in fission;
  • Studies of total and partial neutron cross-sections, angular correlations, multiplicity fluctuations, yields of reaction products in neutron-nuclear interactions;
  • Non-destructive analysis of elemental composition of objects using thermal, resonance and fast neutrons by neutron and gamma spectrometry;
  • Development of experimental techniques.
In Table 4 the list of potential instruments in the IREN facility is presented.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belushkin, A.V. IBR-2—The fast pulsed reactor in Dubna. Neutron News 1991, 2, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ananiev, V.D.; Vinogradov, A.V.; Dolgikh, A.V.; Pepelyshev, Y.N. Physical and power start-up of the modernized IBR-2M research reactor. In Proceedings of the European Research Reactor Conference, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 21–25 April 2013; pp. 4–10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dragunov, Y.G.; Tretiyakov, I.T.; Lopatkin, A.V.; Romanova, N.V.; Lukasevich, I.B.; Ananyev, V.D.; Vinogradov, A.V.; Dolgikh, A.V.; Yedunov, L.V.; Pepelyshev, Y.N.; et al. Modernization of the IBR-2 pulsed research reactor. At. Energy 2012, 113, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IBR-2 Reactor Parameters. Available online: http://flnph.jinr.ru/en/facilities/ibr-2/parameters (accessed on 20 April 2017).
  5. Ananiev, V.; Belyakov, A.; Bulavin, M.; Kulagin, E.; Kulikov, S.; Mukhin, K.; Petukhova, T.; Sirotin, A.; Shabalin, D.; Shabalin, E.; et al. The world’s first pelletized cold neutron moderator at a neutron scattering facility. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 2014, 320, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aksenov, V.L.; Balagurov, A.M.; Kozlenko, D.P. Condensed matter research at the modernized IBR-2 reactor: From functional materials to nanobiotechnologies. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 2016, 47, 627–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balagurov, A.M. High resolution Fourier diffraction at the IBR-2 reactor. Neutron News 2005, 16, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balagurov, A.M.; Beskrovnyy, A.I.; Zhuravlev, V.V.; Mironova, G.M.; Bobrikov, I.A.; Neov, D.; Sheverev, S.G. Neutron Diffractometer for Real-Time Studies of Transient Processes at the IBR-2 Pulsed Reactor. X-ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2016, 10, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neutron instrumentation at the IBR-2. Available online: http://flnph.jinr.ru/en/facilities/ibr-2/instruments (accessed on 20 April 2017).
  10. Frischbutter, A.; Neov, D.; Scheffzuk, C.; Vrana, M.; Walther, K. Lattice strain measurements on sandstones under load using neutron diffraction. J. Struct. Geol. 2000, 22, 1587–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ullemeyer, K.; Spalthoff, P.; Heinitz, J.; Isakov, N.N.; Nikitin, A.N.; Weber, K. The SKAT texture diffractometer at the pulsed reactor IBR-2 at Dubna: experimental layout and first measurements. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 1998, 412, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bokuchava, G.D.; Balagurov, A.M.; Sumin, V.V.; Papushkin, I.V. Neutron Fourier diffractometer FSD for residual stress studies in materials and industrial components. X-ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2010, 4, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aksenov, V.L.; Balagurov, A.M.; Glazkov, V.P.; Kozlenko, D.P.; Naumov, I.V.; Savenko, B.N.; Sheptyakov, D.V.; Somenkov, V.A.; Bulkinc, A.P.; Kudryashevc, V.A.; et al. DN-12 time of flight high pressure neutron spectrometer for investigation of microsamples. Physica B 1999, 265, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuklin, A.I.; Ignat’eva, G.M.; Ozerina, L.A.; Islamov, A.K.; Mukhamedzyanov, R.I.; Shumilkina, N.A.; Myakushev, V.D.; Sharipov, E.Y.; Gordeliy, V.I.; Muzafarov, A.M.; et al. Complementarity of small-angle neutron and X-ray scattering methods for the quantitative structural and dynamical specification of dendritic macromolecules. Polym. Sci. A 2002, 44, 2124–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aksenov, V.L.; Jernenkov, K.N.; Kozhevnikov, S.V.; Lauter, H.; Lauter-Pasyuk, V.; Nikitenko, Y.V.; Petrenko, A.V. The polarized neutron spectrometer REMUR at the pulsed reactor IBR-2. Jt. Inst. Nucl. Res. Comm. 2004, D13-2004-47. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalinin, I.V.; Morozov, V.M.; Novikov, A.G.; Puchkov, A.V.; Savostin, V.V.; Sudarev, V.V.; Bulkin, A.P.; Kalinin, S.I.; Pusenkov, V.M.; Ul’yanov, V.A. Characteristics of the DIN2PI Spectrometer with a Neutron Concentrator. Tech. Phys. 2014, 59, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Natkaniec, I.; Chudoba, D.; Hetmańczyk, Ł.; Kazimirov, V.Y.; Krawczyk, J.; Sashin, I.L.; Zalewski, S. Parameters of the NERA spectrometer for cold and thermal moderators of the IBR-2 pulsed reactor. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 554, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kozlenko, D.P.; Kichanov, S.E.; Lukin, E.V.; Rutkauskas, A.V.; Belushkin, A.V.; Bokuchava, G.D.; Savenko, B.N. Neutron radiography and tomography facility at IBR-2 reactor. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 2016, 13, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frontasyeva, M.V. Analytical Investigations at the IBR-2 Reactor in Dubna. Neutron New. 2005, 16, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ovsyannikov, S.V.; Bykov, M.; Bykova, E.; Kozlenko, D.P.; Tsirlin, A.A.; Karkin, A.E.; Shchennikov, V.V.; Kichanov, S.E.; Gou, H.; Abakumov, A.M.; et al. Charge ordering transition in iron oxide Fe4O5, involving competing dimer and trimer formation. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Avdeev, M.V.; Rulev, A.A.; Bodnarchuk, V.I.; Ushakova, E.E.; Petrenko, V.I.; Gapon, I.V.; Tomchuk, O.V.; Matveev, V.A.; Pleshanov, N.K.; Kataev, E.Y.; et al. Monitoring of lithium plating by neutron reflectometry. Appl. Sur. Sci. 2017, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boettcher, J.; Golubkov, E.A.; Egorov, V.A.; Zaytseva, Y.K.; Zamrij, V.N.; Kayukov, A.S.; Kobets, V.V.; Korokin, A.Z.; Minashkin, V.F.; Pyataev, V.G.; et al. LUE-200 Accelerator of IREN Facility: Current Status and Development. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 2014, 11, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main part of the IBR-2 reactor.
Figure 1. Main part of the IBR-2 reactor.
Qubs 01 00006 g001
Figure 2. Core of the IBR-2 reactor with a movable reflector.
Figure 2. Core of the IBR-2 reactor with a movable reflector.
Qubs 01 00006 g002
Figure 3. Layout of the IBR-2 spectrometer complex.
Figure 3. Layout of the IBR-2 spectrometer complex.
Qubs 01 00006 g003
Figure 4. Crystal structure of Fe4O5 (a), neutron diffraction spectra obtained at different temperatures and treated by the Rietveld method (b), the magnetic structure at T = 150 K (c) and T = 10 K (d).
Figure 4. Crystal structure of Fe4O5 (a), neutron diffraction spectra obtained at different temperatures and treated by the Rietveld method (b), the magnetic structure at T = 150 K (c) and T = 10 K (d).
Qubs 01 00006 g004
Figure 5. Layout of the IREN facility.
Figure 5. Layout of the IREN facility.
Qubs 01 00006 g005
Table 1. IBR-2 parameters before and after modernization.
Table 1. IBR-2 parameters before and after modernization.
ParameterBefore ModernizationAfter Modernization
Average power(MW)22
FuelPuO2PuO2
Number of fuel assemblies7869
Maximum burnup (%)6.59
Pulse repetition rate, Hz5, 255, 10
Pulse half-width, µs:
 fast neutrons215245
 thermal neutrons320340
Rotation rate (rev/min):
 main reflector1500600
 auxiliary reflector300300
CoolantSodiumSodium
Thermal neutron flux density from moderator surface (n/cm2·s):
 time average~1013~1013
 burst maximum~1016~1016
Table 2. List of the IBR-2 instruments.
Table 2. List of the IBR-2 instruments.
NameTypeDomain of researchReference
1.HRFDHigh Resolution Fourier DiffractometerDetermination of structural parameters of crystalline materials with high precision[7]
2.RTD (DN-2)Real-Time Neutron DiffractometerDetermination of structural parameters of crystalline materials and nanosystems (lipid membranes, etc.), real-time studies of chemical and physical processes[8]
3.DN-6Neutron diffractometer for investigations of micro-samples at high pressureDetermination of parameters of crystal and magnetic structure of materials as function of external pressures[9]
4.EPSILON-MDSThe strain/stress diffractometerIn situ studies of macro- and microstresses in rocks[10]
5.SKATThe high-resolution texture diffractometerStudies of texture of geological samples (rocks, minerals)[11]
6.FSDHigh resolution Fourier Stress DiffractometerDetermination of residual stresses in bulk industrial components and new advanced materials[12]
7.DN-12Neutron Diffractometer for Investigations of Micro-Samples at High PressureDetermination of parameters of crystal and magnetic structure of materials as function of external pressures[13]
8.FSSFourier stress spectrometer (Diffractometer)
9.YuMOSmall-Angle ScatteringDetermination of structural characteristics (size and shape of particles, agglomerates, pores, fractals) of nanostructured materials and nanosystems, including polymers, lipid membranes, proteins, solvents, etc.[14]
10.REMURPolarized-neutron spectrometerDetermination of magnetization profile of layered magnetic nanostructures, studies of proximity effects in nanosystems[15]
11.REFLEXPolarized-neutron reflectometerDetermination of structural characteristics of thin films and layered nanostructures[9]
12.GRAINSMultifunctional neutron reflectometer with horizontal sample planeStudies of surface and interface phenomena in soft and liquid nanosystems (magnetic fluids, polymers, lipid membranes)[9]
13.DIN-2PIInelastic scatteringA study of lattice dynamics of crystalline, amorphous materials and liquids[16]
14.NERAInelastic scatteringA study of lattice dynamics and structural parameters of molecular crystals, crystals with molecular ions, especially exhibiting polymorphism[17]
15.NRTNeutron radiography and tomographyMaterial research and studies of products for nuclear technologies, paleontological and geophysical objects, and objects of cultural heritage[18]
16.REGATARadioanalytical complexDetermination of elemental composition of biological and geological objects[19]
17.KOLKHIDANuclear physics facilityInvestigation of nuclear neutron precession and magnetic structure.[9]
18.IZOMERNuclear physics facilityDetermination of yields and decay constants of delayed neutron groups in minor actinide fission
Table 3. IREN parameters.
Table 3. IREN parameters.
ParameterProjectI StageII Stage
Peak current (A)1.51.5–2.51.5–2.5
Repetition rate (Hz)1502550
Electron pulse duration (ns)250100100
Electron energy (MeV)21232–4245–65
Beam power (kW)120.1–0.40.3–1.2
Neutron intensity (n/s)2 × 10133 × 10116 × 1011
Table 4. List of the IREN instruments.
Table 4. List of the IREN instruments.
NameTypeMain FeatureDomain of Research
1ROMASHKA-112 NaI crystal systemDetection of γ-quantaDetermination of concentration of radioactive elements in the environment, study of radioactive neutron capture in the resonance neutron energy range
2ROMASHKA-224 NaI crystal systemDetection of γ-quanta; movable, easy-adjustableStudy of radioactive neutron capture, γ-quanta multiplicity in resonances
3 Large multi-sectional liquid scintillator detectorDetection of γ-quanta and neutrons; six sections, 210 l of scintillatorNondestructive elemental/isotopic analysis by neutron resonance capture and neutron resonance transmission
4 Ionization chambersDifferent kinds: large target area; multi-sectional, solid and gaseous targetsStudy of (n, p), (n, α) reactions in the resonance neutron energy range
5 Double section fission chamber with Frisch grid supplied with fast neutron scintillator detectors and γ-detectorsMeasurements of the kinetic energy and masses of fission fragments, prompt fission neutrons, γ-rays from fission fragmentsStudy of fission in the resonance neutron energy range
6REGATA-2 (in development)Radioanalytical complex: irradiation channels, pneumatic transport setup, hpGe-detector, sample changer, equipment for sample preparationNeutron and γ-activation analysisDetermination of elemental composition of biological and geological objects
7 Neutron polarization setup (planned)) Study of the P-odd, P-even, T-odd effects in resonances

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shvetsov, V.N. Neutron Sources at the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Quantum Beam Sci. 2017, 1, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs1010006

AMA Style

Shvetsov VN. Neutron Sources at the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Quantum Beam Science. 2017; 1(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs1010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shvetsov, Valery N. 2017. "Neutron Sources at the Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research" Quantum Beam Science 1, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs1010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop