Next Article in Journal
An Overview on the Formation and Processing of Nitrogen-Vacancy Photonic Centers in Diamond by Ion Implantation
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Tribological Properties of Gear Synchronizations by Adjusting the Metalworking Fluid Composition of the Grinding Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Induction Heating Validation of Dieless Single-Point Incremental Forming of AHSS

1
Institute of Machine Tools and Production Processes IWP, Technische Universität Chemnitz, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
2
Fraunhofer-Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2017, 1(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1010005
Submission received: 12 July 2017 / Revised: 15 August 2017 / Accepted: 21 August 2017 / Published: 23 August 2017

Abstract

:
Advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) is subject to a high deformation in geometry due to spring-back and high forces during forming. Therefore, dieless single-point incremental forming supported by induction heating was introduced. When a HCT980C steel part was studied, it was observed that the geometrical accuracy increased by forming using a 15 kW induction power, whereas a high deviation in profile geometry was observed by forming using a 5 kW induction power. The forming forces decreased by 66.63% compared with those resulting from forming at room temperature. At the same time, the HCT980C steel part cracked and failed to reach its designed depth when forming at room temperature. Regulating the tensile strength and hardness of the formed part and preventing their reduction was achieved by increasing the feed rate continuously as a function of the formed part’s growing depth. Moreover, the distribution of the induction heating temperature was reduced by introducing the new forming strategy. A cone wall angle of 70° was flexibly formed from a HCT980C steel sheet when the new strategy was applied.

1. Introduction

Dieless single-point incremental sheet metal forming (SPIF) by a tool having a single point of contact is a highly adaptable process whereby the part is formed by the movement of a hemispherical tool along a characterized path. SPIF technology is different from other sheet metal forming methods, such as spinning, piercing, deep drawing, and bending. The mechanism of SPIF is plastic deformation caused by directing a forming tool via a path on the sheet metal using a computer numerical control (CNC) machine [1].
Since SPIF is a dieless process, it is suitable to form complicated prototype profiles within a short period at low cost. The most popular parts that were made by SPIF have been used in aerospace or medical applications [2]. Due to the feasibility shown by SPIF, new applications were presented, such as applying heat in forming hard-to-form, high-strength sheet metals.
A new generation in SPIF has started to apply the heat in different ways during forming to form high-strength sheet metals. Laser heating was investigated by [3] where two moving systems were used: one was a robot to move the tool and the other was a 3D coordinator to guide the laser on the sheet. Furthermore, conduction heating was suggested by [4] to heat the sheet metal by electric heaters for forming a 5083 aluminum magnesium alloy.
Another heating method was presented that involved exerting hot oil to increase the sheet metal temperature as described in [5]. In other investigations, an electrical current was applied that passed through the tool to heat up the sheet, which was studied by [6] to form a titanium alloy TiAl2Mn1.5. A hot air medium was tested in [7] as the temperature of AZ31 alloy was increased to 250 °C and formed it into complicated shapes. Resistance heating was suggested by [8], using two tools held by robots: one to form and the other to support and heat the sheet metal to 600 °C.
It can be concluded from the literature review that there is no heating method accompanied with SPIF that can increase the sheet metal temperature over 750 °C other than with a laser. However, the laser method was specialized by its complexity.
SPIF has still not been implemented widely in industry for numerous reasons, including:
  • Lack of geometrical accuracy in high-strength produced parts [9,10];
  • Limited applications, especially for high-strength metals;
  • Lack of suitability for difficult-to-manufacture parts with a perpendicular wall angle, such as deep drawing;
  • Suitable only for prototype manufacturing because of the time consumed during tool travel along its designed path; and
  • Different component properties in comparison to the conventional sheet metal forming technologies.
This paper proposes a method to increase the importance of SPIF by demonstrating induction heating synchronized with SPIF, or induction-assisted SPIF (IASPIF). The availability of a viable induction heating method with SPIF would increase the interest in it. An advantage of our approach is that high-strength sheet metals can be simply formed into complex geometries by adopting a simplified mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

The sheet metal blanks and their specific parameters for our dieless SPIF investigation were tested by many devices to improve the efficacy of the suggested process. It became clear that the process parameters have a very large influence on the experimental results.
HCT980C dual-phase steel is well known as an advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) and was investigated using a sheet with a thickness of 1.2 mm. The steel alloy was supplied by ThyssenKrupp Stahl-Service-Centre (Radebeul, Germany). The full specifications and properties of the mentioned steel alloy can be found in [11].
The experimental setup of the dieless single-point incremental forming process assisted by induction heating was the same as that used in [12] and is illustrated in Figure 1. The forming tool material was made from hot-worked tool steel X210Cr12 (1.2080) with a diameter of 12 mm. The tool is fully quenched and hardened to 64 HRC and forming tips with diameters of 6 and 12 mm were used. A high frequency induction generator was used with a maximum power capacity of 50 kW and the magnetic radiation frequency was 325 kHz.
An induction coil was connected to the induction generator head which moved simultaneously with the forming tool. A one-turn induction coil utilized in the experiments had outer and inner diameters of 20 and 8 mm, respectively. The coil was made from a rectangular profile with a width of 6 mm shaping the coil face. It also had a depth of 4 mm, as shown in Figure 2.
The suggested profile geometry was designed by the SOLIDWORKS software and then exported into a step file to obtain the tool path code that is used by the CNC milling machine. The tool path code program was made by a CAM-software named ESPRIT. A Kistler dynamometer (type 9255Asp) made by Kistler Instrumente AG (CH-8408 Winterthur, Switzerland) was utilized to enhance the resulting forming forces.
There were difficulties measuring the generated heat in the assembled system. The thermocouple could not be used because of the continuous movement of both the forming tool on the upper portion and the induction coil in the lower portion of the sheet. Therefore, the induction heating temperature was measured by an infrared (IR) camera (InfraTec type VarioCAM®) produced by ESW GmbH (Wedel, Germany), which has a measuring range from −40 to 1700 °C. The measuring frequency was 2 Hz (2 pictures/sec). The IR camera was adopted to measure the lower portion of the sheet temperature, as in [13].

2.1. Effect of Heat on the Formability of the HCT980C Steel

As indicated in Figure 3, the increase in temperature caused a reduction in tensile strength and an increase in ductility due to the transformation of the martensitic phase into pearlite and ferrite. These results were obtained by heating up the material to the desired temperature, soaking up to 20 min and then performing the tensile test. The heating oven was attached to the tensile test machine and the temperature was applied during the tensile test. The tensile tests were carried out according to standard DIN EN 10002-5 by a universal tensile testing machine manufactured by Hegewald and Peschke, GmbH (Nossen, Germany).

2.2. Experimental Conditions

The experimental method consisted of producing a conical shape 100 mm in diameter from the previously stated steel alloy at both room and elevated temperature. The forming parameters used were as follows:
  • The incremental step depth in the z-direction for the milling machine was chosen to be ΔD = 0.5 mm.
  • The starting cone wall angle was 60° then it was increased until failure. The cone depths were then 50 and 70 mm.
  • A graphite powder was sprayed onto the sheet face as a dry lubricating medium because it is not possible to use a liquid lubricant at high temperatures.
  • The original dimensions of the tested sheet blank were 190 mm × 190 mm.
  • No supporting plate was applied in the experiments due to the movement of induction coil in the lower side of the sheet.
  • Tensile test samples were cut by a water jet cutting machine from profiles that were formed from a 150 × 150 mm pyramid. Additionally, these samples were utilized to investigate the resulting strength for the HCT980C steel after induction heating.

2.3. Additional Tests to Improve the Feasability of the Suggested Study on the HCT980C Steel

The formed profiles were scanned by an Atos Core 200 measuring system manufactured by GOM-Gesellschaft für Optische Messtechnik mbH (Braunschweig, Germany). The microhardness tests were conducted on an M1C automated hardness testing system manufactured by EMCO-TEST Prüfmaschinen GmbH (Kuchl, Austria).

3. Results and Discussion

The results contained useful information about HCT980C steel behaviour during dieless hot SPIF. The formability was increased by forming cone wall angles of 62° for HCT980C steel. A new forming technique was developed by forming with variable feed rates during the operation. Initial investigations were done without applying induction heating, forming at room temperature to compare to the parts that were formed by applying induction heating later at elevated temperatures.

3.1. The Effect of Induction Power on the Geometrical Accuracy

The accuracy of the conical parts that were formed from HCT980C steel was measured by a GOMATOS scanning system as the cone profile was clamped by a fixture to guarantee the exact measuring position, as stated in [14]. The scanned profiles represent the formed parts produced during the experiment. The scanned profiles were merged and compared with those designed by the CAD program SOLIDWORKS. The rapprochement between the scanned and the CAD models was done by applying the GOM inspect program. The actual model was placed over the CAD model for the comparison. Figure 4 shows the CAD model of the cone shapes used in this study. Each point on the CAD model was compared with the respective points in the actual model and the combined deviations of the two models appeared as color-scaled deviations.
The most striking results came from the comparison of the scanned profiles and CAD models as indicated in Figure 5. The higher the induction power, the lower the difference between the CAD and scanned profiles. These results correlate satisfactorily with Magnus [15] (p. 118) which stated that a more accurate geometry was formed by a higher laser power that generated higher temperatures.
The negative deviations presented in Figure 5 mean that the scanned part level is lower than the CAD profile level. However, the positive deviations express that the scanned part level is higher than the CAD profile level.

3.2. The Effect of Induction Heating on the Forming Forces

The measured forming forces are shown in Figure 6 for HCT980C steel.
The forces in the z-direction without induction heating (room temperature) exceed 5500 N. The forces during induction heating were limited to 1850 N. It is, therefore, not possible to form the HCT980C steel at room temperature.
The high fluctuation in the forming forces was also discovered by [16]. The pulsing phenomenon in the forming forces was caused by continuous movement of the forming tool on the sheet blank. A calibration process was performed to validate the measured forces in the z-axis direction equal to ± 5 N.

3.3. Influence of Induction Heating on the Microhardness and Mechanical Properties

The maximum tensile strength of HCT980C steel as delivered was 1000 MPa, but after forming at a feed rate of 1.5 m/min and using an induction power of 12.5 kW, the resulting tensile strength decreased to approximately 540 MPa. The obtained tensile strength after forming was extracted from a tensile test sample that was described in Section 2.2.
The HCT980C tensile strength was significantly influenced when heated to more than 750 °C as investigated by [17]. The sample temperature reached 790 °C when formed at a feed rate of 1.5 m/min and using an induction power of 12.5 kW as shown in Figure 7a. At the same time, the formed cone was divided into 3 equal zones as shown in Figure 7b, and the microhardness values of each zone were found different from the neighbouring zone. Furthermore, the total cone height was 70 mm, therefore, each zone was approximately 23.33 mm in length.
As indicated in Figure 8, the minimum microhardness was observed in the third zone due to the reduction of the cone diameter during forming. It appears that heat dissipated more so in the large cone area and was generated more so in the smaller cone area. Figure 8 indicates that the minimum microhardness values were located in the upper end of the smaller cone area. In addition, in the smaller cone area the microhardness reached 106 HV1. The as-delivered microhardness of HCT980C steel is 340 HV1, which corresponds to the area that is located in the first zone.
A very large difference in mechanical properties between the as-delivered and the hot-formed metal has been observed. This phenomenon was also reported in [18] (p. 218), where the author stated that the microhardness of the DC01 steel decreased after hot forming.

3.4. Applying a New Forming Technique

Most researchers who studied hot incremental forming have suggested a constant feed rate during forming and controlled the increase in heat by methods, such as those in [19], which require large and expensive components.
In this work, the effect of induction heating during forming of HCT980C steel was observed to reduce the tensile strength and microhardness of the formed part. Therefore, it is necessary to find a new technique to improve the tensile strength and microhardness for the produced part.

3.4.1. New Forming Technique

The new forming technique is done by forming at a varied feed rate instead of forming at a constant feed rate. In our experiment, the depth of the formed cone was 50 mm and it was divided into eight sections. The feed rate changed from 1.5 to 4.125 m/min as demonstrated in Table 1 below.
The feed rate was changed in the CNC milling machine code program by writing the suitable feed rate for each depth in the z-direction. A large number of feed rates were investigated during initial experiments. This technique depends on changing the feed rate with cone depth during on-line forming operations, which also serves to control the heat distribution in the formed part shape. The optimum feed rates as stated in Table 1 were selected carefully according to the resulting mechanical properties of the formed part as described in the next section.

3.4.2. Effect of the New Technique on Heating Temperature

Using the feed rates in Table 1, the heat distribution over the entire cone profile was shown to be homogenous. The measured temperature for the new technique that uses a variable feed rate is compared to the temperature for the constant feed rate in Figure 9.
We also observed that when forming with a constant feed rate, the heating temperature increased from 625 °C to more than 900 °C from the beginning to the end of the process. When applying the new technique, the temperature was between 650 °C to 750 °C during the entire forming operation. The mechanical properties obtained from the tensile samples after 20 min of soaking as stated in Section 2.1 were not like those obtained from the instantaneous sheet heating by induction synchronized with SPIF.

3.4.3. Influence of the New Technique on Formed Part Properties

The tensile strength of the produced parts when forming with the new technique was between 880 to 690 MPa, which is much better than those listed previously in Section 3.3. At the same time, the obtained microhardness was increased in a homogenous distribution between 270 to 330 HV1 for all zones in the cone depth.

3.5. Improving the Formability

The findings of this investigation indicate the capability to form cone wall angles of 70° in HCT980C steel when using a varied feed rate, as shown in Figure 10. The formed 70° wall angle was accomplished by using an 8 mm tool tip diameter.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

A cone shape in HCT980C steel was accomplished using SPIF assisted by induction heating. The geometrical accuracy was enhanced by varying the feed rate and increasing the induction power.
The forming force generated during induction heating was reduced to 1850 N from 5500 N that was generated during forming at room temperature.
This investigation proposed a method to form the AHSS aided by induction heating, but disadvantages due to excessive heating rates were observed. The excessive heating rates caused an increase in ductility and reduction in the hardness of the formed part. However, a smart solution was introduced to solve the ductility and hardness problem by forming at a variable feed rate ranging from 1.5 to 4.125 m/s. The difference in heating temperature at the beginning and the end of forming time in constant feed rate was 275 °C. However, by applying the new method, the difference from the beginning to the end of the forming time was less than 100 °C. The formability of HCT980C steel was demonstrated by forming a part with a 70° wall angle.
Future investigations could include heating the sheet up to 900 °C and performing a quenching operation to increase the hardness during forming. This can be done by using a quenchable steel to make a tailored part of different strength zones.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Institute of Machine Tools and Production Processes IWP at the TU Chemnitz and the Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU for their support.

Author Contributions

A. Al-Obaidi conceived and designed the experiments; A. Al-Obaidi performed the experiments; A. Al-Obaidi and V. Kräusel analyzed the data; A. Al-Obaidi contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; A. Al-Obaidi and V. Kräusel wrote the paper; and all authors participated in the elaboration and discussion of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeswiet, J.; Micari, F.; Hirt, G.; Bramley, A.; Duflou, J.; Allwood, J. Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2005, 54, 88–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ambrogio, G.; de Napoli, L.; Filice, L.; Gagliardi, F.; Muzzupappa, M. Application of incremental forming process for high customised medical product manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 162–163, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duflou, J.R.; Callebaut, B.; Verbert, J.; de Baerdemaeker, H. Laser assisted incremental forming: Formability and accuracy improvement. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 56, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hino, R.; Nagaishi, N.; Yamamoto, Y.; Naka, T.; Yoshida, F. Incremental forming with local heating for aluminum-magnesium alloy sheet. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Technology Plasticity (ICTP 2014), Nagoya Congress Center, Nagoya, Japan, 19–24 October 2014; pp. 946–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Galdos, L.; de Argandoña, E.S.; Ulacia, I.; Arruebarrena, G. Warm incremental forming of magnesium alloys using hot fluid as heating media. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 504–506, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fan, G.; Gao, L.; Hussain, G.; Wu, Z. Electric hot incremental forming: A novel technique. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2008, 48, 1688–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weise, D.; Landgrebe, D. Development of a new variant of incremental sheet metal forming using heated air. In Proceedings of the IDDRG 2015 Conference, Shanghai, China, 31 May–3 June 2015; pp. 90–97. [Google Scholar]
  8. Meier, H.; Magnus, C.; Buff, B.; Zhu, J.H. Tool concepts and materials for incremental sheet metal forming with direct resistance heating. Key Eng. Mater. 2013, 549, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meier, H.; Magnus, C. Incremental sheet metal forming with direct resistance heating using two moving tools. Key Eng. Mater. 2013, 554–557, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohammadi, A.; Vanhove, H.; Van Bael, A.; Duflou, J.R. Towards accuracy improvement in single point incremental forming of shallow parts formed under laser assisted conditions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Sheet Metal, SheMet 2015, Erlangen, Germany, 16–18 March 2015; pp. 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Neugebauer, R.; Göschel, A.; Rautenstrauch, A.; Meza-García, E. Influence of the steel alloy composition on phase transitions and its applicability to hot forming process. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Technology Plasticity (ICTP 2011), Aachen, Germany, 25–30 September 2011; pp. 429–434. [Google Scholar]
  12. Al-Obaidi, A.; Kräusel, V.; Landgrebe, D. Hot single-point incremental forming assisted by induction heating. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 82, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fan, G.; Gao, L. Mechanical property of Ti-6Al-4V sheet in one-sided electric hot incremental forming. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 72, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Duflou, J.R.; Callebaut, B.; Verbert, J.; De Baerdemaeker, H. Improved SPIF performance through dynamic local heating. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2008, 48, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Magnus, C.S. Lokale Joulesche Erwärmung der Umformzone in der Roboterbasierten Inkrementellen Blechumformung; Shaker Verlag GmbH: Herzogenrath, Germany, 2015; ISBN 978-3-8440-3618-3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Aerens, R.; Eyckens, P.; Bael, A.; Duflou, J.R. Force prediction for single point incremental forming deduced from experimental and FEM observations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2009, 46, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Z.; Jin, G.; Niu, F.; Tang, D.; Zhao, A. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of 1000 MPa cold rolled dual-phase steel. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2009, 19, s563–s568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Callebaut, B. Sheet Metal Forming By Laser Forming and Laser Assisted Incremetal Forming; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Leuven, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  19. Göttmann, A.; Bailly, D.; Bergweiler, G.; Bambach, M.; Stollenwerk, J.; Hirt, G.; Loosen, P. A novel approach for temperature control in ISF supported by laser and resistance heating. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 67, 2195–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental setup applied in the investigations for IASPIF process. (a) Close up of forming tool and sheet blank; and (b) entire setup.
Figure 1. Experimental setup applied in the investigations for IASPIF process. (a) Close up of forming tool and sheet blank; and (b) entire setup.
Jmmp 01 00005 g001
Figure 2. Partial sectional view from induction coil, all dimensions are in mm.
Figure 2. Partial sectional view from induction coil, all dimensions are in mm.
Jmmp 01 00005 g002
Figure 3. The effect of heating temperature on the mechanical properties of HCT980C steel. Rm = maximum tensile strength and Ag = elongation percentage.
Figure 3. The effect of heating temperature on the mechanical properties of HCT980C steel. Rm = maximum tensile strength and Ag = elongation percentage.
Jmmp 01 00005 g003
Figure 4. CAD model of cone shapes used in this study.
Figure 4. CAD model of cone shapes used in this study.
Jmmp 01 00005 g004
Figure 5. (a) 3D geometrical scan compared with CAD profiles formed by 62° cone wall angle; and (b) quartered sections showing comparisons for different induction heating powers.
Figure 5. (a) 3D geometrical scan compared with CAD profiles formed by 62° cone wall angle; and (b) quartered sections showing comparisons for different induction heating powers.
Jmmp 01 00005 g005
Figure 6. Force in the z-direction during forming both with and without induction heating at a power of 12.5 kW for 62° cone wall angle test samples formed at a 1.5 m/min feed rate.
Figure 6. Force in the z-direction during forming both with and without induction heating at a power of 12.5 kW for 62° cone wall angle test samples formed at a 1.5 m/min feed rate.
Jmmp 01 00005 g006
Figure 7. (a) Thermographic image taken by IR camera showing the inductor and the heat generated during induction heating and forming; and the (b) formed cone from HCT980C steel divided into three zones.
Figure 7. (a) Thermographic image taken by IR camera showing the inductor and the heat generated during induction heating and forming; and the (b) formed cone from HCT980C steel divided into three zones.
Jmmp 01 00005 g007
Figure 8. Microhardness vs. cone depth for the three zones in the Figure 7b.
Figure 8. Microhardness vs. cone depth for the three zones in the Figure 7b.
Jmmp 01 00005 g008
Figure 9. The temperature distribution on a 62° wall cone during forming with a constant and varied feed rates from the beginning until the end of the operation.
Figure 9. The temperature distribution on a 62° wall cone during forming with a constant and varied feed rates from the beginning until the end of the operation.
Jmmp 01 00005 g009
Figure 10. A 70° cone wall angle by a varied feed rate made form HCT980C steel.
Figure 10. A 70° cone wall angle by a varied feed rate made form HCT980C steel.
Jmmp 01 00005 g010
Table 1. The feed rate as a function of cone depth during forming.
Table 1. The feed rate as a function of cone depth during forming.
Forming feed rate (m/min)1.51.8752.252.62533.3753.754.125
Cone depth in (mm) from-to 0–1010–1515–2020–2525–3030–3535–4045–50

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Obaidi, A.; Kräusel, V.; Landgrebe, D. Induction Heating Validation of Dieless Single-Point Incremental Forming of AHSS. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2017, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1010005

AMA Style

Al-Obaidi A, Kräusel V, Landgrebe D. Induction Heating Validation of Dieless Single-Point Incremental Forming of AHSS. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2017; 1(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Obaidi, Amar, Verena Kräusel, and Dirk Landgrebe. 2017. "Induction Heating Validation of Dieless Single-Point Incremental Forming of AHSS" Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 1, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1010005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop