Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2017) | Viewed by 54308

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2. Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, and Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Interests: advanced automated manufacturing, 3D Printing, biomaterials, dental implants, dental materials, biomimetic strategies for regenerative medicine, wound healing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the 1980s, researchers have been inspired by the promise of 3D Printing to produce complex biomedical devices, design better instruments, create patient specific devices, deliver drugs, replace lost tissues, guide wound healing, and regenerate tissues. From pre-surgical models to tooling molds and instrument prototypes, 3D Printing has evolved to create one-of-a-kind devices, implants, scaffolds for tissue engineering, diagnostic platforms, and drug delivery systems. However, there were over 20 years between the initial publications on 3D Printing of drug delivery devices and the first FDA approval of 3D Printed tablets. This highlights the fact that, numerous technical, regulatory, and commercial limitations must be overcome before 3D Printing can reach its full potential in biomedical applications.

This Special Issue will feature scientific breakthroughs in printing technology, biomaterials, and post-processing strategies that will enable wider deployment of this exciting technology in biomedical applications. The issue will also provide industry perspectives on the regulatory and commercial challenges of scaling up customized, one-of-a-kind biomedical device and drug delivery systems.

We look forward to your contributions to this exciting issue.

Prof. Ben Wu, DDS, PhD
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Biomaterials
  • 3d Printing
  • Solid Freeform Fabrication
  • Rapid Prototyping,
  • Additive Manufacturing

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

8219 KiB  
Article
Doped Halloysite Nanotubes for Use in the 3D Printing of Medical Devices
by Jeffery A. Weisman, Udayabhanu Jammalamadaka, Karthik Tappa and David K. Mills
Bioengineering 2017, 4(4), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4040096 - 15 Dec 2017
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 6657
Abstract
Previous studies have established halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) as viable nanocontainers capable of sustained release of a variety of antibiotics, corrosion agents, chemotherapeutics and growth factors either from their lumen or in outer surface coatings. Accordingly, halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) hold great promise as drug [...] Read more.
Previous studies have established halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) as viable nanocontainers capable of sustained release of a variety of antibiotics, corrosion agents, chemotherapeutics and growth factors either from their lumen or in outer surface coatings. Accordingly, halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) hold great promise as drug delivery carriers in the fields of pharmaceutical science and regenerative medicine. This study explored the potential of 3D printing drug doped HNT constructs. We used a model drug, gentamicin (GS) and polylactic acid (PLA) to fabricate GS releasing disks, beads, and pellets. Gentamicin was released from 3D printed constructs in a sustained manner and had a superior anti-bacterial growth inhibition effect that was dependent on GS doping concentration. While this study focused on a model drug, gentamicin, combination therapy is possible through the fabrication of medical devices containing HNTs doped with a suite of antibiotics or antifungals. Furthermore, tailored dosage levels, suites of antimicrobials, delivered locally would reduce the toxicity of individual agents, prevent the emergence of resistant strains, and enable the treatment of mixed infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

875 KiB  
Article
3D Printing and 3D Bioprinting in Pediatrics
by Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman, Jerry Y H Fuh and Wen Feng Lu
Bioengineering 2017, 4(3), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4030063 - 13 Jul 2017
Cited by 58 | Viewed by 16928
Abstract
Additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as 3D printing, is a technology that builds three-dimensional structures and components layer by layer. Bioprinting is the use of 3D printing technology to fabricate tissue constructs for regenerative medicine from cell-laden bio-inks. 3D printing and bioprinting have [...] Read more.
Additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as 3D printing, is a technology that builds three-dimensional structures and components layer by layer. Bioprinting is the use of 3D printing technology to fabricate tissue constructs for regenerative medicine from cell-laden bio-inks. 3D printing and bioprinting have huge potential in revolutionizing the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This paper reviews the application of 3D printing and bioprinting in the field of pediatrics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

2001 KiB  
Article
Photocurable Bioink for the Inkjet 3D Pharming of Hydrophilic Drugs
by Giovanny F. Acosta-Vélez, Chase S. Linsley, Madison C. Craig and Benjamin M. Wu
Bioengineering 2017, 4(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010011 - 28 Jan 2017
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 9537
Abstract
Novel strategies are required to manufacture customized oral solid dosage forms for personalized medicine applications. 3D Pharming, the direct printing of pharmaceutical tablets, is an attractive strategy, since it allows for the rapid production of solid dosage forms containing custom drug dosages. This [...] Read more.
Novel strategies are required to manufacture customized oral solid dosage forms for personalized medicine applications. 3D Pharming, the direct printing of pharmaceutical tablets, is an attractive strategy, since it allows for the rapid production of solid dosage forms containing custom drug dosages. This study reports on the design and characterization of a biocompatible photocurable pharmaceutical polymer for inkjet 3D printing that is suitable for hydrophilic active pharmaceutical ingredients (API). Specifically, hyaluronic acid was functionalized with norbornene moieties that, in the presence of poly(ethylene) glycol dithiol, Eosin Y as a photoinitiator, and a visible light source, undergoes a rapid step-growth polymerization reaction through thiol-ene chemistry. The engineered bioink was loaded with Ropinirole HCL, dispensed through a piezoelectric nozzle onto a blank preform tablet, and polymerized. Drug release analysis of the tablet resulted in 60% release within 15 min of tablet dissolution. The study confirms the potential of inkjet printing for the rapid production of tablets through the deposition of a photocurable bioink designed for hydrophilic APIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

5068 KiB  
Article
Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
by Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam, Ahmadreza Jahadakbar, Amirhesam Amerinatanzi, Roman Skoracki, Michael Miller, David Dean and Mohammad Elahinia
Bioengineering 2017, 4(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010005 - 22 Jan 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 7206
Abstract
The current gold standard of care for mandibular segmental defeat reconstruction is the use of Ti-6Al-4V immobilization hardware and fibular double barrel graft. This method is often successful immediately at restoring mandible function, however the highly stiff fixation hardware causes stress shielding of [...] Read more.
The current gold standard of care for mandibular segmental defeat reconstruction is the use of Ti-6Al-4V immobilization hardware and fibular double barrel graft. This method is often successful immediately at restoring mandible function, however the highly stiff fixation hardware causes stress shielding of the grafted bone and stress concentration in the fixation device over time which can lead to fixation device failure and revision surgery. The purpose of reconstructive surgery could be to create normal stress trajectories in the mandible following engraftment. We investigate the use of a two stage mechanism which separates the immobilization/healing and regenerative phases of mandibular segmental defect treatment. The device includes the use of a very stiff, Ti-6Al-4V, releasable mechanism which assures bone healing. Therefore it could be released once the reconstructed boney tissue and any of its ligamentous attachments have completely healed. Underneath the released Ti-6Al-4V plate would be a pre-loaded nitinol (NiTi) wire-frame apparatus that facilitates the normal stress-strain trajectory through the engrafted bone after the graft is healed in place and the Ti-6Al-4V fixation device has been released. Due to the use of NiTi wires forming a netting that connects vascularized bone and possibly bone chips, bone grafts are also more likely to be incorporate rather than to resorb. We first evaluated a healthy adult mandible during normal mastication to obtain the normal stress-strain distribution. Then, we developed the finite element (FE) model of the mandibular reconstruction (in the M1-3 region) with the proposed fixation device during the healing (locked state) and post-healing (released state) periods. To recreate normal stress trajectory in the reconstructed mandible, we applied the Response Surface Methodology (RMS) to optimize the Bone Bandaid geometry (i.e., wire diameters and location). The results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism immobilizes the grafted bone in the locked state properly since the maximum resultant gap (21.54 micron) between the graft and host mandible surfaces are in the safe region (less than 300 micron). By considering the von Mises criteria for failure, FE analysis together with experimental studies (i.e., compressive and tensile testing on the inferior and superior fixation devices, respectively) confirm that the proposed fixation devices do not fail, showing safety factor of at least 10.3. Based on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) technique, the optimal parameter values for the wires are achieved (0.65 mm and 1 mm for the superior and inferior wires, respectively) and the required level of preload on each wire are calculated (369.8 N and 229 N for the inferior and superior wires, respectively). The FE results for stress distribution on the reconstructed mandible during the released state closely match that of a healthy mandible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

7100 KiB  
Article
Finite Element Simulation and Additive Manufacturing of Stiffness-Matched NiTi Fixation Hardware for Mandibular Reconstruction Surgery
by Ahmadreza Jahadakbar, Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam, Amirhesam Amerinatanzi, David Dean, Haluk E. Karaca and Mohammad Elahinia
Bioengineering 2016, 3(4), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3040036 - 19 Dec 2016
Cited by 57 | Viewed by 13027
Abstract
Process parameters and post-processing heat treatment techniques have been developed to produce both shape memory and superelastic NiTi using Additive Manufacturing. By introducing engineered porosity, the stiffness of NiTi can be tuned to the level closely matching cortical bone. Using additively manufactured porous [...] Read more.
Process parameters and post-processing heat treatment techniques have been developed to produce both shape memory and superelastic NiTi using Additive Manufacturing. By introducing engineered porosity, the stiffness of NiTi can be tuned to the level closely matching cortical bone. Using additively manufactured porous superelastic NiTi, we have proposed the use of patient-specific, stiffness-matched fixation hardware, for mandible skeletal reconstructive surgery. Currently, Ti-6Al-4V is the most commonly used material for skeletal fixation devices. Although this material offers more than sufficient strength for immobilization during the bone healing process, the high stiffness of Ti-6Al-4V implants can cause stress shielding. In this paper, we present a study of mandibular reconstruction that uses a dry cadaver mandible to validate our geometric and biomechanical design and fabrication (i.e., 3D printing) of NiTi skeletal fixation hardware. Based on the reference-dried mandible, we have developed a Finite Element model to evaluate the performance of the proposed fixation. Our results show a closer-to-normal stress distribution and an enhanced contact pressure at the bone graft interface than would be in the case with Ti-6Al-4V off-the-shelf fixation hardware. The porous fixation plates used in this study were fabricated by selective laser melting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop