Plant Extracts as Insecticides in Pest Control

A special issue of Insects (ISSN 2075-4450).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2016) | Viewed by 21710

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland Gatton, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
Interests: extraction and evaluation of biopesticides; new approaches and processes for natural products; integrated pest management; applied entomology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainable agriculture through better ecological approaches in pest management is the stimulus for further research in alternate pesticides against conventional pesticides, which lead to increased research in plant sources.

Since a few decades ago, biopesticides have emerged as a potential alternative to synthetic pesticide. The growing interest in biopesticides also stems from the rapid expansion of organic farming during the past decade and the public’s need to have year-round availability of high-quality food. There is also the need to increase food production to meet a growing world population. Biopesticide products can help in crop protection thereby increasing crop yields. For these reasons, development of new novel biopesticides has continued to increase rapidly since mid-1990s. In short, biopesticides play a vital role in crop protection, meeting societal needs and sustaining the planet.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) categorises biopesticides into biochemical pesticides, microbial pesticides and plants containing added genetic material. However, the most common categories of biopesticides are botanicals and microbial pesticides. Botanical pesticides refer to pesticides of plant origin, where microbial pesticides refer to pesticides that include micro-organisms such as bacteria, fungi and viruses. Botanical pesticides are obtained from plants (medicinal and aromatic). A wide range of technologies is available for extraction of active components and essential oils from medicinal and aromatic plants. The choice depends on the economic feasibility and suitability of the process to the particular situation. Many of these components are secondary plant substances, including alkaloids, quinines, essential oils (including terpenoids), glycosides and flavonoids. Essentially, these compounds interfere with the growth and development of a pest, its ability to reproduce, or pest ecology, so reducing the expansion of the pest population.

Parasitoids and predators are natural enemies of insect pests in agroecosystems. Most conventional insecticides used to control pests in cultivated crops are relatively broad spectrum, killing the target species and the non-target beneficial insects as well. In general, the plant-derived insecticides, although effective against insect pests of agricultural importance, spare the beneficial insect’s comparative to conventional insecticides, because of their capacities of biodegradable nature and innate low mammal toxicity. However, some plant derived products either in crude or in formulation showed slight or moderate ill effects to some parasitoids, predators and honey bees during the application [and] may greatly reduce the risk.

No residual or persistent toxicity of botanical pesticides in the environment has so far been reported. In terms of insect resistance to botanical pesticides, it has developed as quickly as with conventional pesticides because the complex mixture in the botanical insecticides act to disrupt the selection process due to multiple modes of action. Plant derived insecticides are compatible with IPM, Biological Control and also with some conventional pesticides.

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Errol Hassan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Insects is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Biopesticide efficacy (insects, disease & weeds)
  • Biopesticide mechanisms of toxicity
  • Vector control using biopesticides
  • Effects of biopesticides against vegetable pests
  • Biopesticides efficacy against storage pests
  • Biopesticide evaluation against mite pests
  • Arthropod disease vectors
  • Biopesticides as herbicides and Fungicides

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

4772 KiB  
Article
Insecticide Effect of Zeolites on the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)
by Caroline De Smedt, Veerle Van Damme, Patrick De Clercq and Pieter Spanoghe
Insects 2016, 7(4), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7040072 - 02 Dec 2016
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 7770
Abstract
(1) Background: The tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is a key tomato insect pest. At present, it is considered to be a serious threat in various countries in Europe, North Africa, and Middle East. The extensive use and the developed resistance of [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is a key tomato insect pest. At present, it is considered to be a serious threat in various countries in Europe, North Africa, and Middle East. The extensive use and the developed resistance of T. absoluta to spinosad causes some concern, which leads to the need for alternative products. (2) Materials and Methods: Several laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate the ovicidal properties of a zeolite particle film on T. absoluta. The toxicity of three different zeolites and six zeolite formulations to T. absoluta eggs and larvae was determined using different exposure methods. (3) Results: In general, the formulated zeolites yielded higher egg and larvae mortality values, especially when the zeolite particle film was residually applied. Notable differences in mortality rates from exposure to zeolites compared to other products, such as kaolin, its formulated product Surround, and the insecticide spinosad, were observed. Kaolin and Surround exhibited little or no effect for both application methods, while the hatch rate was reduced by 95% when spinosad was applied topically. Spinosad yielded egg and larvae mortality rates of 100% for both application methods. Additionally, increased oviposition activity was observed in adults exposed to the wettable powder (WP) formulations. These WP formulations increased egg deposition, while Surround and spinosad elicited a negative oviposition response. (4) Conclusions: It can be derived that the tested products, zeolites BEA (Beta polymorph A), FAU (Faujasite), LTA (Linde type A), and their formulations, had no real insecticidal activity against the eggs of T. absoluta. Nevertheless, egg exposure to zeolites seemed to affect the development process by weakening the first instar larvae and increasing their mortality. Subsequently, based on the choice test, no significant difference was observed between the number of eggs laid on the treated leaves and control leaves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Insecticides in Pest Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1242 KiB  
Article
Repellent Activity of Botanical Oils against Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae)
by Emily H. Kuhns, Xavier Martini, Angel Hoyte and Lukasz L. Stelinski
Insects 2016, 7(3), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7030035 - 14 Jul 2016
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5739
Abstract
The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, is the insect vector of the pathogen causing huanglongbing. We selected three botanical oils to evaluate behavioral activity against D. citri. In laboratory olfactometer assays, fir oil was repellent to D. citri females, while litsea [...] Read more.
The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, is the insect vector of the pathogen causing huanglongbing. We selected three botanical oils to evaluate behavioral activity against D. citri. In laboratory olfactometer assays, fir oil was repellent to D. citri females, while litsea and citronella oils elicited no response from D. citri females. In choice settling experiments, D. citri settled almost completely on control plants rather than on plants treated with fir oil at a 9.5 mg/day release rate. Therefore, we conducted field trials to determine if fir oil reduced D. citri densities in citrus groves. We found no repellency of D. citri from sweet orange resets that were treated with fir oil dispensers releasing 10.4 g/day/tree as compared with control plots. However, we found a two-week decrease in populations of D. citri as compared with controls when the deployment rate of these dispensers was doubled. Our results suggest that treatment of citrus with fir oil may have limited activity as a stand-alone management tool for D. citri and would require integration with other management practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Insecticides in Pest Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1650 KiB  
Communication
Field Method for Testing Repellency of an Icaridin-Containing Skin Lotion against Vespid Wasps
by Jean-Luc Boevé, Frank Eertmans, Els Adriaens and Bart Rossel
Insects 2016, 7(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7020022 - 03 Jun 2016
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4643
Abstract
Vespid wasps are ecologically beneficial predators of insects but their stings also pose a human health risk. Current control methods based on killing vespids are suboptimal. Here, the repellent effect against Vespula vulgaris of a 20% icaridin skin lotion was evaluated under field [...] Read more.
Vespid wasps are ecologically beneficial predators of insects but their stings also pose a human health risk. Current control methods based on killing vespids are suboptimal. Here, the repellent effect against Vespula vulgaris of a 20% icaridin skin lotion was evaluated under field conditions. An experimental setup was designed in which six artificial skin pieces (10 × 10 cm) were video-recorded for 1 h, to count each min the numbers of flying and feeding vespids. Prior to monitoring, five pieces were successively smeared with 2 mg of cream per cm2, in 30 min intervals, from t = −120 min to 0. The sixth sheet remained untreated to serve as a control. One milliliter of an attractant, fruit jam, was deposited on each of the six surfaces at t = 0. The control surface was free of any flying or feeding vespid during an average period of 25 min, whereas the other five surfaces (treated at t = −120, −90, −60, −30, and 0 min) remained vespid-free for 39, 40, 45, 49, and 51 min, respectively. The skin lotion remained significantly active for at least 2 h. The experimental methodology is adjustable and allows the study of repellents against vespids in semi-natural conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Insecticides in Pest Control)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop