Advantages of Three Dimensional (3D) Cell Cultures

A special issue of Microarrays (ISSN 2076-3905).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2015) | Viewed by 47979

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
zet - BioMed-zet Life Science GmbH, Industriezeile 36/I, A-4020 Linz, Austria
Interests: three-dimensional (3D) cell culture; in vitro models; gene expression; microarray

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
zet - BioMed-zet Life Science GmbH, Industriezeile 36/I, A-4020 Linz, Austria

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the last years progress has been made that the common technique where adherent cells grow in monolayers in two-dimensional (2D) cell culture has its limitations. When cultured in the long-term in 2D, the supply of nutrients is insufficient, the cell-cell and cell-material interactions are unphysiological and most of the cells will not stay viable. The upcoming three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models promise to overcome these disadvantages and should resemble more likely the in vivo situation of tissues or organs. Currently, many different 3D cell culture models using different cell types, conditions and materials are under investigation. All of them is common that they must improve their advantages for basic and applied research. Microarrays can be important tools to analyze the characteristic gene expression profiles of the 3D cell culture models, doing comparative studies, and to define the 3D culture effects. The special issue invites contributions to publish their results about gene expression profiling in different 3D cell culture models.

It will be of interest to the readers of this special issue to show, how 3D cell culture has influence on cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell viability, general cell functionality, response to stimuli and in metabolism in comparison to highlight its advantages for basic and applied research.

Dr. Mohammad Reza Lornejad-Schafer
Dr. Christine Schäfer
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Microarrays is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 350 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.


Keywords

  • gene expression
  • microrray
  • three-dimensional (3D) cell culture
  • two-dimensional (2D) cell culture
  • in vitro model

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

994 KiB  
Article
Hydrogel Microwell Arrays Allow the Assessment of Protease-Associated Enhancement of Cancer Cell Aggregation and Survival
by Daniela Loessner, Stefan Kobel, Judith A. Clements, Matthias P. Lutolf and Dietmar W. Hutmacher
Microarrays 2013, 2(3), 208-227; https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays2030208 - 22 Aug 2013
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 7733
Abstract
Current routine cell culture techniques are only poorly suited to capture the physiological complexity of tumor microenvironments, wherein tumor cell function is affected by intricate three-dimensional (3D), integrin-dependent cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. 3D cell cultures allow the investigation of cancer-associated proteases [...] Read more.
Current routine cell culture techniques are only poorly suited to capture the physiological complexity of tumor microenvironments, wherein tumor cell function is affected by intricate three-dimensional (3D), integrin-dependent cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. 3D cell cultures allow the investigation of cancer-associated proteases like kallikreins as they degrade ECM proteins and alter integrin signaling, promoting malignant cell behaviors. Here, we employed a hydrogel microwell array platform to probe using a high-throughput mode how ovarian cancer cell aggregates of defined size form and survive in response to the expression of kallikreins and treatment with paclitaxel, by performing microscopic, quantitative image, gene and protein analyses dependent on the varying microwell and aggregate sizes. Paclitaxel treatment increased aggregate formation and survival of kallikrein-expressing cancer cells and levels of integrins and integrin-related factors. Cancer cell aggregate formation was improved with increasing aggregate size, thereby reducing cell death and enhancing integrin expression upon paclitaxel treatment. Therefore, hydrogel microwell arrays are a powerful tool to screen the viability of cancer cell aggregates upon modulation of protease expression, integrin engagement and anti-cancer treatment providing a micro-scaled yet high-throughput technique to assess malignant progression and drug-resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advantages of Three Dimensional (3D) Cell Cultures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

1584 KiB  
Review
3D Cell Culture in Alginate Hydrogels
by Therese Andersen, Pia Auk-Emblem and Michael Dornish
Microarrays 2015, 4(2), 133-161; https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020133 - 24 Mar 2015
Cited by 261 | Viewed by 29860
Abstract
This review compiles information regarding the use of alginate, and in particular alginate hydrogels, in culturing cells in 3D. Knowledge of alginate chemical structure and functionality are shown to be important parameters in design of alginate-based matrices for cell culture. Gel elasticity as [...] Read more.
This review compiles information regarding the use of alginate, and in particular alginate hydrogels, in culturing cells in 3D. Knowledge of alginate chemical structure and functionality are shown to be important parameters in design of alginate-based matrices for cell culture. Gel elasticity as well as hydrogel stability can be impacted by the type of alginate used, its concentration, the choice of gelation technique (ionic or covalent), and divalent cation chosen as the gel inducing ion. The use of peptide-coupled alginate can control cell–matrix interactions. Gelation of alginate with concomitant immobilization of cells can take various forms. Droplets or beads have been utilized since the 1980s for immobilizing cells. Newer matrices such as macroporous scaffolds are now entering the 3D cell culture product market. Finally, delayed gelling, injectable, alginate systems show utility in the translation of in vitro cell culture to in vivo tissue engineering applications. Alginate has a history and a future in 3D cell culture. Historically, cells were encapsulated in alginate droplets cross-linked with calcium for the development of artificial organs. Now, several commercial products based on alginate are being used as 3D cell culture systems that also demonstrate the possibility of replacing or regenerating tissue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advantages of Three Dimensional (3D) Cell Cultures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

886 KiB  
Review
3D Cultivation Techniques for Primary Human Hepatocytes
by Anastasia Bachmann, Matthias Moll, Eric Gottwald, Cordula Nies, Roman Zantl, Helga Wagner, Britta Burkhardt, Juan J. Martínez Sánchez, Ruth Ladurner, Wolfgang Thasler, Georg Damm and Andreas K. Nussler
Microarrays 2015, 4(1), 64-83; https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4010064 - 16 Feb 2015
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 9958
Abstract
One of the main challenges in drug development is the prediction of in vivo toxicity based on in vitro data. The standard cultivation system for primary human hepatocytes is based on monolayer cultures, even if it is known that these conditions result in [...] Read more.
One of the main challenges in drug development is the prediction of in vivo toxicity based on in vitro data. The standard cultivation system for primary human hepatocytes is based on monolayer cultures, even if it is known that these conditions result in a loss of hepatocyte morphology and of liver-specific functions, such as drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. As it has been demonstrated that hepatocytes embedded between two sheets of collagen maintain their function, various hydrogels and scaffolds for the 3D cultivation of hepatocytes have been developed. To further improve or maintain hepatic functions, 3D cultivation has been combined with perfusion. In this manuscript, we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of different 3D microfluidic devices. For most systems that are currently available, the main issues are the requirement of large cell numbers, the low throughput, and expensive equipment, which render these devices unattractive for research and the drug-developing industry. A higher acceptance of these devices could be achieved by their simplification and their compatibility with high-throughput, as both aspects are of major importance for a user-friendly device. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advantages of Three Dimensional (3D) Cell Cultures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop