Plant Photosynthetic Gas Exchange: a Current Perspective

A special issue of Plants (ISSN 2223-7747).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2018) | Viewed by 6387

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, North Carolina, NC 27109, USA
Interests: Plant physiological; biophysical ecology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Idaho, ID 83209, USA
Interests: Plant physiological ecology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Quantifying the components of the photosynthetic CO2 uptake pathway from air to the chloroplast is fundamental to understanding limitations to plant carbon assimilation and growth. These limitations to CO2 gas exchange can occur at the canopy, crown, leaf, cell, subcellular, and molecular levels, and involve a host of plant structural and environmental variables. Physiologically, the light reactions of photosynthesis also influence the CO2 uptake pathway by providing the energy driving carbon assimilation. Quantifying the resistance (1/conductance) of each component of the pathway from the ambient air to the chloroplast continues to be a challenge today, potentially providing specific targets for identifying limitations expressed at the molecular level. Moreover, these pathway resistors are often driven by environmental variables such as sunlight incidence, temperature, humidity, soil water and nutrient availability. The specific resistors most limiting to CO2 uptake (e.g., stomatal versus mesophyll cell) are continuing to be evaluated and linked to molecular control mechanisms in both agricultural and native species. Additionally, the concomitant loss of water vapor accompanying CO2 uptake may be controlled by stomata to optimize water-use efficiency. The recognition that too much sunlight can lead to severe photoinhibition of photosynthesis is now also well established. In addition, the possible use of internally generated CO2 (e.g., from mitochondrial and photorespiration) is a continuing area of research that is being investigated with the use of natural isotopes. Similarly, the influence of stored carbon and carbon processing (respiration) on CO2 uptake is only recently being evaluated. The effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on photosynthetic gas exchange is currently being contemplated both physiologically and ecologically at multiple organizational and spatial scales. The primary purpose of this Special Issue is to point out what topics in this broad area are currently unknown, but important to our understanding of plant photosynthetic gas exchange in both natural and agricultural systems.

Prof. Dr. William K. Smith
Dr. Keith Reinhardt
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Plants is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Photosynthetic gas exchange
  • CO2 resistance/conductance pathway
  • Carbon processing and respiration
  • Internal CO2 recycling
  • Photoinhibition

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 1376 KiB  
Article
Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
by James Bunce
Plants 2018, 7(3), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030062 - 05 Aug 2018
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5903
Abstract
Whether the mesophyll conductance to CO2 movement (gm) within leaves of C3 plants changes with CO2 concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO2 concentrations. We tested for changes in gm over the range [...] Read more.
Whether the mesophyll conductance to CO2 movement (gm) within leaves of C3 plants changes with CO2 concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO2 concentrations. We tested for changes in gm over the range of sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations (Ci) for which Rubisco activity limited photosynthesis (A) in three plant species grown under the same conditions. Mesophyll conductance was estimated by three independent methods: the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis, variable J fluorescence combined with gas exchange, and the curvature of the Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curve. The latter assay used a new method of rapidly obtaining data points at approximately every 3 μmol mol−1 for Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curves, allowing separate estimates of curvature over limited Ci ranges. In two species, soybean and sunflower, no change in gm with Ci was detected using any of the three methods of estimating gm. In common bean measured under the same conditions as the other species, all three methods indicated large decreases in gm with increasing Ci. Therefore, change in gm with Ci in the Rubsico-limited region of A vs. Ci curves depended on the species, but not on the method of estimating gm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Photosynthetic Gas Exchange: a Current Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop