sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Education and Approaches".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2019) | Viewed by 22848

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Aarhus University, Tuborgvej 164, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
Interests: Knowledge sharing; lifelong learning; organisational change and development; organisational learning; sustainability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Aarhus University, Tuborgvej 164, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Organisational learning happens when organisations make changes in how knowledge and experiences are build, arranged and integrated in the organisation as e.g. new routines and behaviors, actions and learning systems or practice-based competences. The vast majority of organisational learning researchers argues that fast-changing and dynamic societal and business environments are making it more imperative than ever that organisations have the capacity to learn and adapt. Still, the majority of organisational learning studies have had its focus on strategy, management, economic performance and competitiveness with limited concerns for what learning means in relation to transforming the ecosystems around and within organisations in a sustainable way. We thus need to turn our attention to what characterize decent, durable and responsible processes and outcomes of learning and change in e.g. work environments, work life, business models, inter and intra-organisational development and growth and production, thus develop a theory of learning in organisations that are shaped in the context of sustainability.

The aim of this special issue Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations is to develop the existing knowledge on sustainable organisational learning. Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations aspire to address how we are to define and conceptualize sustainable organisational learning and what characterize sustainable learning and change processes in organisations. With this special issue, we particularly want to reach out and strengthen ties to ongoing research in the nexus of sustainability and organizational learning. Given the importance of the societal and business challenges and complexity of the transition towards sustainable organisational learning, we welcome empirical and theoretical research from diverse and cross-disciplinary perspectives that can focus on the following indicative topics:

  • Struggles over the meaning of sustainability within and across organizational learning
  • Conceptualize sustainable learning in organisations based on a behavioural, cognitive or practice-based framework.
  • Challenges and opportunities for sustainable organisational learning and change models
  • Action related for how to create the grounds for transitions to sustainable organisational learning between and across different types of organisations
  • Outline factors that distinguish sustainable learning and change in organisations and its ecosystems from less sustainable ones
  • The consequences of broader contextual dynamics in the emergence of more sustainable patterns of learning and change in the organisation and its ecosystems.
  • Circumstances of obtaining more inclusive and durable models of learning and change in different sizes and types of organisations
  • Present examples and cases of applied research on organisational change that reflects attempts to design sustainable patterns of learning

References:

Benn S and Martin A. (2010). Learning and change for sustainability reconsidered: A role for boundary objects. Academy of Management Learning & Education 9: 397-412.

Brandi U and Elkjaer B. (2011). Organisational learning viewed from a social learning perspective. In: Easterby-Smith M and Lyles MA (eds) Handbook of Organizational learning and knowledge management. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Elkjaer B. (2004). Organizational learning - The 'third way'. Management learning 35: 419-434.

Zollo M, Cennamo C and Neumann K. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment 26: 241-259.

Siebenhüner B and Arnold M. (2007). Organizational learning to manage sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 339-353.

Pluye P, Potvin L and Denis J-L. (2004). Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability. Evaluation and Program Planning 27: 121-133.

Smith PA. (2012). The importance of organizational learning for organizational sustainability. The learning organization 19: 4-10.

Wals AE. (2011). Learning our way to sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 5: 177-186.

Prof. Dr. Ulrik Brandi
Prof. Dr. Bente Elkjaer
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Knowledge sharing
  • lifelong learning
  • organisational change and development
  • organisational learning
  • sustainability

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 395 KiB  
Article
Stimulating and Educating Engineers to Innovate through Individual Continuous Learning
by Jing Liu, Xiaokang Zhao and Chunliang Zhao
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030843 - 23 Jan 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2938
Abstract
Based on the self-determination theory and planned behavior theory, this paper studied the mechanisms of innovative behavior driven by engineers’ individual continuous learning. It was found that individual continuous learning can promote engineers’ innovative behavior and that career planning and self-efficacy play a [...] Read more.
Based on the self-determination theory and planned behavior theory, this paper studied the mechanisms of innovative behavior driven by engineers’ individual continuous learning. It was found that individual continuous learning can promote engineers’ innovative behavior and that career planning and self-efficacy play a dual mediating role in the effect that individual continuous learning has on bringing about innovative behavior. In addition, engineers’ risk tolerance positively increases the effect of individual continuous learning on self-efficacy. Furthermore, the organizational climate affects the innovative behavior brought about by engineers’ individual continuous learning. Therefore, we make some suggestions for vocational education and the management of engineers. It is necessary for managers to develop strategies to encourage engineers to continue learning both inside and outside the organization. Organizations need to support engineers in improving their professional skills and abilities so as to enhance self-efficacy. Managers need to pay attention to career planning for engineers, assist them in career planning, and help them to achieve their career goals through training or related courses. Managers also need to allow engineers to make mistakes and strengthen risk education for engineers. Managers need to create a climate of innovation in which members support and cooperate with each other so that engineers can implement innovative behavior more effectively and achieve innovative goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1670 KiB  
Article
Expansive Social Learning, Morphogenesis and Reflexive Action in an Organization Responding to Wetland Degradation
by David Lindley and Heila Lotz-Sisitka
Sustainability 2019, 11(15), 4230; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154230 - 05 Aug 2019
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3638
Abstract
This study (conducted as PhD research at Rhodes University, South Africa) describes a formative interventionist research project conducted to explore factors inhibiting improved wetland management within a corporate plantation forestry context and determine if, and how, expansive social learning processes could strengthen organizational [...] Read more.
This study (conducted as PhD research at Rhodes University, South Africa) describes a formative interventionist research project conducted to explore factors inhibiting improved wetland management within a corporate plantation forestry context and determine if, and how, expansive social learning processes could strengthen organizational learning and development to overcome these factors. A series of formative interventionist workshops and feedback meetings took place over three years; developing new knowledge amongst staff of Company X, and improved wetland management practices. Through the expansive learning process, the tensions and contradictions that emerged became generative, supporting expansive learning that was reflectively engaged with throughout the research period. The study was== supported by an epistemological framework of cultural historical activity theory and expansive learning. Realist social theory, emerging from critical realism, with its methodological compliment the morphogenetic framework gave the research the depth of detail required to explain how the expansive learning, organizational social change, and boundary crossings that are necessary for assembling the collective were taking place. This provided ontological depth to the research. The research found that expansive learning processes, which are also social learning processes (hence we use the term ‘expansive social learning’, supported organizational learning and development for improved wetland management. Five types of changes emerged from the research: (1) Changes in structure, (2) changes in practice, (3) changes in approach, (4) changes in discourse, and (5) changes in knowledge, values, and thinking. The study was able to explain how these changes occurred via the interaction of structural emergent properties and powers; cultural emergent properties and powers; and personal emergent properties and powers of agents. It was concluded that expansive learning could provide an environmental education platform to proactively work with the sociological potential of morphogenesis to bring about future change via an open-ended participatory and reflexive expansive learning process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1697 KiB  
Article
External Partnerships in Employee Education and Development as the Key to Facing Industry 4.0 Challenges
by Katarína Stachová, Ján Papula, Zdenko Stacho and Lucia Kohnová
Sustainability 2019, 11(2), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020345 - 11 Jan 2019
Cited by 102 | Viewed by 12651
Abstract
The new challenges that will currently affect the existence and sustainability of businesses stem from the dramatic changes that come from the fourth industrial revolution. Based on the concept of intellectual capital management as a resource-based strategic management approach, which leads to the [...] Read more.
The new challenges that will currently affect the existence and sustainability of businesses stem from the dramatic changes that come from the fourth industrial revolution. Based on the concept of intellectual capital management as a resource-based strategic management approach, which leads to the management of structural, human, and relational capital, sustainable human resource management underlines the involvement of partnerships and external relations in learning and personal development processes. Industry 4.0 expects major changes in human resource management and processes such as education. Organizations will benefit from the new knowledge in the near future that will need to be brought into the internal environment of the organization constantly. However, this will require cooperation with the external environment, and the resulting new education opportunities built on cooperation with external partners, organizations, and educational institutions. Innovations as essential factors in adapting to major changes in the environment will be key in all organizational processes, including educational. This paper focuses on comparing highly innovative countries and less innovative countries in Central Europe, analyzing 1482 businesses by looking at differences in attitude towards employee education and individual forms of employee education. The main statistically significant difference is in the strategic approach to employee education and development and the set-up between innovative countries and moderate innovators. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 484 KiB  
Article
An Empirical Analysis of Students’ Involvement and Exit Behaviors in College Organizations: The Case of Nanjing Agricultural University in China
by Qi Zhang, Yubing Fan and Mingyang Zhang
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 3933; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113933 - 29 Oct 2018
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2922
Abstract
Student organization is considered an important approach for the sustainable development of ideological and political education, and it helps construct learning style and campus culture. This research studies college students’ motivations for their involvement and exit behaviors. Using a binary choice model, we [...] Read more.
Student organization is considered an important approach for the sustainable development of ideological and political education, and it helps construct learning style and campus culture. This research studies college students’ motivations for their involvement and exit behaviors. Using a binary choice model, we analyze critical factors affecting the involvement and exit behaviors of college students based on social cognition theory, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and expectancy theory. On the one hand, our results show active cognition is most influential for the involvement behavior, followed by personal interest. Meanwhile, active cognition is positively affected by mother’s higher education level and senior students’ influence. Respondents who agree that joining organizations brings closer relations with teachers and other students as well as promoting heterosexual communication are more likely to join. On the other hand, the most influential factor for the exit behavior is unclear promotion mechanisms. Low-quality activities and wasting time with organizations cause students to quit. Moreover, lack of training opportunities and professional guidance dampens members’ enthusiasm. Complicated interpersonal relations, bureaucratic style, entering a higher grade and changing psychology cause some members to quit and further affect organizational learning. We provide additional insights on management strategies towards organization sustainability, such as improving leader selection and building harmonious interpersonal relations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Learning and Change in Organisations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop