Next Article in Journal
Individualized Supplementation of Immunoactive Micronutrients and Severity of Upper Respiratory Infection Symptoms—A Randomized Intervention Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Nutrition Messaging by Healthcare Students: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Social Media Usage and Digital Competence
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Sustainably Sourced Protein Consumption on Nutrient Intake and Gut Health in Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Weight Loss Trajectories and Short-Term Prediction in an Online Weight Management Program
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/nu16091399
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Use of Digital Tools for the Assessment of Food Consumption in Brazil: A Scoping Review

by
Adriane dos Santos da Silva
1,
Flávia dos Santos Barbosa Brito
1,*,
Debora Martins dos Santos
1 and
Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye
2,3,*
1
Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, São Francisco Xavier Street, 524, Rio de Janeiro 20550-900, Brazil
2
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK
3
Centre for Healthcare Research, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(9), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091399
Submission received: 25 March 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 1 May 2024 / Published: 6 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Transformations in Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This is a scoping review on mapping the use of digital tools to assess food consumption in Brazil. Searches were carried out in nine electronic databases (Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, Ovid, Free Medical Journal and Crossref) to select studies published from October 2020 to December 2023. This review identified forty-eight digital tools in the 94 publications analyzed, the most frequent being web-based technologies (60%) and mobile devices (40%). Among these studies, 55% (n = 52) adopted a population-based approach, while 45% (n = 42) focused on specific regions. The predominant study design observed was cross-sectional (n = 63). A notable trend observed was the increasing frequency of validation studies in recent years. Although the use of digital tools in the assessment of food consumption in Brazil has grown in recent years, studies did not describe the process of creating and validating the tools, which would contribute to the improvement of data quality. Investments that allow the expansion of the use of the internet and mobile devices; the improvement of digital literacy; and the development of open-access tools, especially in the North and Northeast regions, are challenges that require a concerted effort towards providing equal opportunities, fostering encouragement, and delving deeper into the potential of digital tools within studies pertaining to food consumption in Brazil.

1. Introduction

Assessing food consumption of individuals or populations is a complex task [1]. It requires a methodology that facilitates data collection, ensures validity and improves the accuracy of the results [2,3].
The methods for assessing food consumption are, in general, based on the description and quantification of food consumed and data is recorded on paper. However, in recent years, technological advances in nutritional epidemiology have been driving the development and use of digital tools based on computers, mobile phones, cameras, scanners, personal digital assistants, and Web-based to replace paper-based instruments. These digital tools have improved automation and standardization of dietary assessment methods [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Studies have shown that digital tools have several advantages. For example, they allow for data collection optimization, greater storage capacity, information accuracy, speed in processing, and greater precision in estimating dietary data. They also reduce the cost and time spent on research, especially population-based research [2,5,7,8,10,11,12,13,14]. On the other hand, studies emphasize that the acceptability of digital tools for data collection may vary according to study population characteristics such as age, education, income, health conditions, and digital literacy [15,16,17,18,19].
Eldridge et al., in a literature review spanning from 2011 to 2017 and focusing on English-language publications, identified a total of forty-three digital tools designed for dietary assessment, with only two originating from Brazil [20]. Despite acknowledging various advantages associated with digital dietary assessment tools, the review highlighted a notable deficiency in the comprehensive documentation of the development, applicability, and validation processes of these tools, particularly within the context of food consumption assessment in Brazil [20]. Therefore, it is relevant to identify studies that developed, used, and tested digital technologies, based on web-based and mobile devices, in the assessment of food consumption, to describe in a systematic manner their characteristics, types of tools and their contribution to improve the assessment of dietary consumption in the country. Thus, the present study carried out a scoping review to map the use of digital tools for the assessment of food consumption in Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This scoping review was carried out according to the review method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) [21] and Arksey O’Malley, 2005 [22] and Levac Colquhoun and O’Brien, 2010 [23] and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews) guidelines [24] [Supplementary File S1]. The review process encompassed five sequential steps: formulation of the research question, development of the search strategy, study selection, data extraction, and synthesis and presentation of findings.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria were formulated in alignment with the overarching research question. Adhering to the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) strategy, the research question was structured as follows: “What is the purpose, extent, scope, and nature of digital tools utilized for assessing food consumption in the context of Brazil?” [21]. In this review we define digital tools as electronic platforms or applications specifically designed to collect, store, and analyse dietary intake data. These tools may include features like self-administered questionnaires, image capture, barcode scanning, and integration with dietary databases for nutrient estimation.
All types of publications available in full access, and which portrayed the topic of interest were eligible. Based on our definition of digital tool, studies solely relying on paper-based questionnaires that are later manually entered into spreadsheets or other software were not included. Studies that did not address aspects inherent to the research question, incomplete materials, studies not available in full, literature reviews and articles that were not in Portuguese, English or Spanish were excluded [22,23].

2.3. Search Strategy

An initial exploratory search was conducted to guide the development of the final search strategy. The comprehensive strategy was formulated following an examination of multiple article titles and abstracts deemed pertinent, as well as the indexing terminology employed in PUBMED. This strategy was then adapted for compatibility with other databases and tested before the definitive searches were executed.
The searches were performed by three independent reviewers (A.S.S.; D.M.S., F.S.B.B.), from October 2020 to December 2023, without time limit, in Medline (via Pubmed), Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, Ovid, Free Medical databases Journal and Crossref. In addition, these were searched on the CAPES journal portal, based on identification through the Federated Academic Community (CAfe), as a form of standardization for data collection. The PCC strategy, together with the terms Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCs), Medical Subject Headings (MESH), and Embase subject heading (Emtree) are described in Table 1. The full list of search terms is given in Supplementary File S2.
Regarding the grey literature, the search for national dissertations and theses was carried out through the CAPES theses bank, Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD) coordinated by the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (IBCIT), Google Scholar, the System for Information on Gray Literature in Europe (OpenGrey) and the Grey Literature network services (GreyNet).
The bibliographies of the papers included were examined manually, and forward citation searching was also conducted. Furthermore, contact was made with key researchers in the field of nutrition and identify additional studies.

2.4. Study Selection

All records were exported to the Zotero 6 reference manager to identify and quantify duplicates. After duplicate removal, the records were exported to Rayyan. Three investigators (A.S.S., D.M.S., F.S.B.B.) screened the titles and abstracts of the search results. Each abstract was independently reviewed by the investigators to assess eligibility according to the established inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by group discussion and consensus. Full-text screening was performed independently and in duplicate by A.S.S., D.M.S., and F.S.B.B., and disagreements were resolved by consensus. The rationale for excluding a full-text study that did not meet the inclusion criteria was documented.

2.5. Data Extraction and Analysis

Data extracted included authorship, year of publication, type of study, geographic location, study population, type of tool and technology used. In addition, we extracted the information on the digital tool (time in minutes, free access) and validation process (reference method, main results), when available. Microsoft Excel version 16 was used for data collection and extraction. The extracted data were reviewed and summarized to meet the objectives of the review. Data from each paper were sorted into a summary and synthesized. Other characteristics of the included studies were summarized using graphs.

3. Results

The search strategy yielded 1287 articles. After eliminating duplicates, 1206 articles were screened based on their abstracts and titles. The full text of 424 articles was then reviewed and 94 articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Of these included studies, 56 (60%) were identified by an electronic search, 33 (35%) by searching the reference lists of the included studies, and 5 (5%) were recommended by consulted researchers. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow diagram for the screening process.
Of the 94 studies [8,9,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116], 52 (55%) were population-based, and 42 (45%) were regional. Of these 42 studies, 26 (61.9%) were carried out in the Southeast region, as shown in Figure 2.
In total 44 (47%) papers were published in journals [8,9,25,26,28,29,30,31,50,51,52,53,54,55,57,59,63,65,69,79,82,83,85,86,87,88,89,91,92,93,96,97,98,102,103,104,105,106,108,109,111,112,113,116], 26 (28%) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,100,101] were publications of population-based studies conducted by research institutes, 13 (14%) [27,32,33,60,61,67,81,84,90,95,99,110,115] were dissertations, 8 (8%) [58,64,66,68,70,94,107,114] were theses, and 3 (3%) [56,62,80] were research protocols. All included studies were published between 2004 and 2023. Regarding the type of study design, there was a predominance of cross-sectional studies and an increase in validation studies over the last six years (Figure 3).
The characteristics of all studies (n = 94) included in the scoping review are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. In terms of population, 58% of the digital tools were developed for adults, 35% for children and/or adolescents, and only 1% for the older adult population. In terms of the platform used, 60% were web-based, with 34% used free forms such as Google Forms and 40% were applications. For the data collection and entry interface, 35% of the studies used computers (notebooks and personal computers), 4% used personal digital assistants (PDAs), and 60% used mobile-based (smartphones and tablets) (Table S1). Of all reported food consumption assessment methods, the 24-h recall (24HR) and food frequency questionnaires were the most common, with 33% and 31%, respectively (Figure 4).
The description of the 48 digital tools identified can be found in Supplementary Table S2. Of the 48, 58% the data entry method chosen was self-reported, in 25% the identification of food items was aided through digital images, and in 18%, the calculation of energy and nutrients was obtained through a database data integrated into the tool (Table S2). Image capture as the method of assessing food consumption was used in only two studies [32,62]. The most frequent way of using images in research was to help identify household measures during the consumption report. The average time (minutes) to complete the dietary assessment was provided for 10 tools and it ranged from 3 min for Nova screener for the consumption of ultra-processed foods on the Epicollect5 Data Collection® platform to 50 min for the Online questionnaire in personal digital assistant (PDA) (Table S2).
Food composition data were reported as additional information in 63% of the tools. The most commonly used food composition tables in the studies were the Brazilian Food Composition Table (TACO) [117], the Nutritional Composition Table of Foods Consumed in Brazil published by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [118], the new Brazilian Food Composition Table version 7.2 [119], and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) table, also known as the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) [120].
Of the 94 studies, 11 (11.7%) studies were related to tool validation. The characteristics of the validation of the tools included in the scoping review (n = 11) are summarised in Supplementary Table S3. In these studies, the most used reference or gold standard method was the 24HR and direct observation of food intake (Table S3).
Several tools demonstrated satisfactory validity for assessing dietary intake, including the Online version of the Previous Day Food Questionnaire (PDFQ) for schoolchildren [63], Web-CAAFE for students [79], QUACEB for schoolchildren [96], and CUME online FFQ for adults [27]. The QSFA showed that the QSFA online was validates for iron and calcium [95]. The DQI-DFG tool exhibited consistent validity and reliability [50]. NutriSim was found to be user-friendly but with scattered answers [68] (Table S3).
The FODMAP Project tool demonstrated good reproducibility for all FODMAP groups and good validity for lactose, with lower validity for other FODMAPs [115]. The CAAFE tool/questionnaire required further validation to improve its accuracy [59] (Table S3).

4. Discussion

This scoping review on the use of digital tools to assess food consumption in Brazil identified 94 studies reporting 48 distinct digital tools. It was observed that that there is not a singularly preferred digital tool for food consumption assessment within the country. This is due to the complexity of data collection and the varying aims of included studies.
The most frequent dietary assessment methods were FFQ (35%) [25,27,28,54,63,66,71,72,73,74,81,88,92,95,105,112,113,114,115] and 24HR (31%) [9,29,31,51,55,56,58,61,68,78,80,85,89,96,107]. This finding corroborates the literature indicating these two methods are the most commonly employed approaches for evaluating food consumption patterns [2].
Due to the rapid advent of digital tools to assess food consumption in the international context, this scoping review was carried out to understand the Brazilian scenario regarding their development, purpose and applications.
Data from the 2019 Continuous National Household Sample Survey (Continuous PNAD) revealed that 82.7% of Brazilian households had Internet access, showing an increase of 3.6% compared to 2018. Additionally, approximately 96% of the Brazilian population utilized the Internet for communication purposes, such as sending or receiving text, voice or image messages [120]. Moreover, the percentage of individuals aged ten years or older who owned a personal mobile phone rose from 79.3% in 2018 to 81% in 2019 [120]. These figures underscore the growing use of the Internet and mobile phones across Brazil potentially indicating an emerging interest in digital technologies within the population.
The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19), which affected all countries, accelerated the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in various aspects of our daily lives [121]. The increased use of such technologies has contributed to improving literacy and digital inclusion.
Given the current limitations of data collection by traditional methods, the increased use of technology can further boost the development and application of digital tools in studies that assess food consumption in the country. Research indicates that these digital solutions exhibit heightened accuracy, particularly among younger demographics equipped with computers or mobile devices, as well as among adults boasting higher levels of education and income [7,121]. Such findings highlight the transformative potential of technology in augmenting the efficacy and precision of dietary assessment methodologies, thereby underlining its pivotal role in advancing public health research and interventions.
The review found that studies were mainly conducted in the Southeast and South regions of Brazil. Santana et al. (2019) observed a rise in innovation funding from 2001 to 2014, particularly in the Southeast and South regions, while the North and Northeast regions received below-average funding.
Regarding internet access, the Continuous National Household Sample Survey—Continuous PNAD [120] indicates increased usage across all major regions, particularly in the Northeast, with a 5.2 percentage point rise. However, the Northeast still exhibits the lowest percentage of households with internet access (74.3%), potentially explaining the scarcity of studies utilizing digital tools in this region.

4.1. Validation Studies

The review observed a rise in validation studies conducted in Brazil in recent years. Of the eleven validation studies identified [27,50,59,63,68,79,90,95,96,107,115], only one underwent a validation process deemed unsatisfactory. While many studies reported satisfactory outcomes, some highlighted the need for further analyses across diverse age groups to enhance the tool’s accuracy.
Other studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of utilizing digital tools in assessing food consumption [14,20,122]. These tools not only help minimize errors but also ensure standardization in method application [14,20,122]. In Brazil, it was possible to identify that, in recent years, there have been promising advances in the development, validation, and application of digital tools to assess food consumption, for example, population-based studies such as The Consumer Expenditure Surveys (POF), The Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents (ERICA), the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019) and, more recently, the cohort study NutriNet-Santé [9,29,78,113,123,124,125].

4.2. Comparison with International Studies

This review identified a promising trend in the development and use of digital food consumption assessment tools in Brazil. While the review by Eldridge et al. mapped 43 such tools globally, the present study identified 43 in Brazil alone, indicating a surge in domestic interest [20].
It is important to note that established reference methods, such as food weighing, biomarkers, and doubly labelled water, are still utilized in Brazil. However, the review found a relative scarcity of digital tools incorporating these gold-standard methods. Nevertheless, the observed increase in validation studies suggests potential improvement in this area, reflecting the commitment of Brazilian researchers to developing robust digital alternatives.
Examining the global landscape of digital food assessment tools reveals significant progress. The International Agency for Research on Cancer-World Health Organization (IARC-WHO) pioneered efforts with the development of EPIC-Soft, while ongoing advancements are evident in the FETA tool (FFQ EPIC Tool for Analysis) [126,127].
Brazil is one of the Latin American countries that are part of the EPIC-Soft initiative, which aims to adapt existing international methods for collecting individual food consumption data using the GloboDiet software, developed for use in different countries around the world [9]. The Brazilian version of the software, developed by Steluti et al., promises a more accurate assessment of national food consumption [9]. Another positive point is the information from the authors that the software will be made available, free of charge, to the scientific community on a platform for collecting short-term consumption data, through standardized and valid procedures. This availability could significantly contribute to the expansion of nutrition epidemiological studies carried out in the country, as only 2% of the identified tools in this review were freely accessible [9].
Due to the scarcity of validated and freely accessible digital tools, some studies used free digital forms such as Google Forms [25,33,84,88,89,96,105,109]. However, these forms present inherent limitations due to their structure and inability to comprehensively capture the complexities of food consumption assessment. These include difficulties in incorporating crucial elements such as food photographs, household measurements, and nutritional information about consumed items. There is also the impossibility of carrying out the instrument validation process.
Brazil is a country of continental dimensions, marked by social and economic inequalities and significant regional disparities. The results of this scoping review study can contribute to the description of the situation of digital tools in other developing countries with similar sociodemographic characteristics. Thus, compared to the international scenario, the process of development, use, and validation of new digital technologies remains limited.

4.3. Targeting Specific Populations and Assessment Methods

This review identified a focus on adult and adolescent populations in most studies, limiting applicability to children and older adults. However, initiatives are underway to address these gaps. Lacerda et al. developed a tool for assessing food consumption in children under five, contributing to updated national guidelines [82]. Similarly, Silva et al. are developing a tool for studies on older adult populations [111].
As Eldridge et al. highlight that selecting appropriate tools depends on study objectives and target audiences [20]. There is no single “gold standard” digital tool; researchers must consider each technique’s advantages, limitations, and applicability within a digital context [20]. Additionally, broader digital methods like food markers, dietary quality indicators, and food insecurity measures are valuable, particularly in large-scale studies like VIGITEL (Surveillance System of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey for adults in Brazil) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49], PNS (National Health Survey) [75,76], Continuous PNAD [77], and PENSSAN network (National Survey on Food Insecurity in the Context of theCovid-19 Pandemic in Brazil) [100,101].

4.4. Limitations and Strenghths

This scoping review identified a significant increase in the use of digital tools for food consumption assessment in Brazil. However, several limitations are important to consider when interpreting the findings. This review focused on mapping the landscape of digital tools used in Brazilian dietary assessment studies. It did not assess the quality, validity, or effectiveness of the tools themselves. While the review identified a range of tools, it cannot comment on their specific functionalities, limitations, or potential for bias. The limited number of studies with detailed validation data restricts our ability to draw general conclusions about the overall validity of digital tools for dietary assessment in Brazil.
Few studies detailed described the methodological process of construction, the use of digital tools, or even provided details on whether the methods used to assess food consumption come from digital tools. The absence of this description in published papers reporting data on dietary assessment may have contributed to the underestimation of the number of studies included in this review and an underestimation of the actual number of digital tools currently in use within Brazil. Also, the review could not distinguish between tools originally developed as digital and those adapted from paper-based methods.
The development, implementation and maintenance of a digital tool require operational infrastructure and financial resources. Thus, the high cost and the need for technical skills to develop digital tools can also be identified as additional difficulties in the production of these tools in Brazil.
It is noteworthy that this review is one of the first to map the use of digital tools in studies on the assessment of food consumption in Brazil. Moreover, the list of references of included papers and grey literature databases contributed significantly to this review, especially the identification of relevant theses and dissertations. Furthermore, consultation with researchers in the field was an important step, representing 5% of the included studies. Despite the existing criticisms about the use of Google Scholar, 14% of the studies were identified via this database.
This review focused specifically on the Brazilian context. While findings may offer insights applicable to other developing countries with similar sociodemographic characteristics, further research is needed to explore the use of digital tools for food consumption assessment on a global scale.

4.5. Good Practice Guidelines

Based on good practice guidelines to assist and improve the quality of the description of new digital technologies in the assessment of food consumption proposed by Eldridge et al., it is important to emphasize that the recent national studies of digital tools to assess food consumption should include detailed information on the development, the purpose of the tool and applicability of the tool, type of technology used (computers, web-based, mobile devices, cameras, scanners, etc.), type of data entry (text, voice, image capture, barcode scanning, food list, food composition tables, etc.), chosen evaluation method (24HR, FFQ, etc.), financial resources and average time spent on development and in the data processing in their reports [20]. It is worth highlighting the importance of studies presenting, among their results, details on the usability, reproducibility, reliability, and validity of the tool being proposed.

5. Conclusions

This review identified a growing trend in the development and use of digital food consumption assessment tools in Brazil. However, several areas require further attention. Firstly, further studies are needed to enhance data availability and stimulate the development of new tools. Secondly, a national guide outlining best practices for tool selection would benefit researchers. Thirdly, it is recommended that the tools developed are properly validated, which is important to ensure a robust dataset, accurate results and the legitimacy of study findings. Finally, addressing the challenges of internet access, digital literacy, and technology development, particularly in underserved regions, is crucial for equitable application of these tools.
In conclusion, despite the identified limitations, the present review highlights the promising potential of digital food consumption assessment tools in Brazil. Continued domestic efforts in tool development and open-access initiatives, coupled with investments in infrastructure and digital literacy, hold significant promise for advancing nutritional research in the country.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16091399/s1, Table S1: Summary of characteristics for all studies (n = 94) included in the scoping review, Table S2: Summary of characteristics for digital tools (n = 48) included in the scoping review, Table S3: Summary of characteristics for validation studies (n = 11) included in the scoping review, File S1: PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, File S2: The detailed search in the databases.

Author Contributions

A.R.A.A., D.M.d.S. and F.d.S.B.B. conceived and designed the scoping review; A.d.S.d.S., D.M.d.S. and F.d.S.B.B. led the design of the protocol and collected and analyzed the articles. All authors participated in drafting, reading, and approving the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), number: E26/010001450/2015/INST.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beaton, G.H.; Burema, J.; Ritenbaugh, C. Errors in the interpretation of dietary assessments. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65 (Suppl. S4), 1100S–1107S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marchioni, D.M.L.; Gorgulho, B.M.; Steluti, J. Consumo Alimentar: Guia Para Avaliação, 4th ed.; Manole: São Paulo, Brasil, 2019; ISBN 108520456189. [Google Scholar]
  3. Subar, A.F.; Freedman, L.S.; Tooze, J.A.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Boushey, C.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Thompson, F.E.; Potischman, N.; Guenther, P.M.; Tarasuk, V.; et al. Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 2639–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cade, J.E. Measuring diet in the 21st century: Use of new technologies. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Falomir, Z.; Arregui, M.; Madueño, F.; Corella, D.; Coltell, Ó. Automation of Food Questionnaires in Medical Studies: A state-of-the-art review and future prospects. Comput. Biol. Med. 2012, 42, 964–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gemming, L.; Doherty, A.; Kelly, P.; Utter, J.; Ni Mhurchu, C. Feasibility of a SenseCam-assisted 24-h recall to reduce under-reporting of energy intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67, 1095–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Illner, A.K.; Freisling, H.; Boeing, H.; Huybrechts, I.; Crispim, S.P.; Slimani, N. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 41, 1187–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schneider, B.C.; Motta, J.V.; Muniz, L.C.; Bielemann, R.M.; Madruga, S.W.; Orlandi, S.P.; Gigante, D.P.; Assunção, M.C. Design of a digital and self-reported food frequency questionnaire to estimate food consumption in adolescents and young adults: Birth cohorts at Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2016, 19, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Steluti, J.; Crispim, S.P.; Araujo, M.C.; Peralta, A.M.; Pereira, R.A.; Sichieri, R.; Yokoo, E.M.; Marchioni, D.M. Technology in Health: Brazilian version of the GloboDiet program for dietary intake assessment in epidemiological studies. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2020, 23, e200013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amoutzopoulos, B.; Steer, T.; Roberts, C.; Cade, J.E.; Boushey, C.J.; Collins, C.E.; Trolle, E.; de Boer, E.J.; Ziauddeen, N.; van Rossum, C.; et al. Traditional methods v. new technologies—Dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: A report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015. J. Nutr. Sci. 2018, 7, e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boland, M.; Bronlund, J. eNutrition—The next dimension for eHealth? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Curioni, C.C.; Brito, F.S.B.; Boccolini, C.S. The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in The Field of Nutrition. J. Bras. Tele. 2013, 2, 103–111. Available online: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/coleciona-sus/2013/31030/31030-590.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Dietary Assessment: A Resource Guide to Method Selection and Application in Low Resource Settings; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2018; ISBN 978-92-5130635-2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ngo, J.; Engelen, A.; Molag, M.; Roesle, J.; García-Segovia, P.; Serra-Majem, L. A review of the use of information and communication technologies for dietary assessment. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101 (Suppl. S2), S102–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Gilsing, A.M.; Hobin, E.; Solbak, N.M.; Wallace, A.; Haines, J.; Mayhew, A.J.; Orr, S.K.; Raina, P.; Robson, P.J.; et al. Lessons from Studies to Evaluate an Online 24-Hour Recall for Use with Children and Adults in Canada. Nutrients 2017, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kong, K.; Zhang, L.; Huang, L.; Tao, Y. Validity and practicability of smartphone-based photographic food records for estimating energy and nutrient intake. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 26, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kong, F.; Tan, J. DietCam: Automatic dietary assessment with mobile camera phones. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2012, 8, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rollo, M.E.; Ash, S.; Lyons-Wall, P.; Russell, A. Trial of a mobile phone method for recording dietary intake in adults with type 2 diabetes: Evaluation and implications for future applications. J. Telemed. Telecare 2011, 17, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rowland, M.K.; Adamson, A.J.; Poliakov, I.; Bradley, J.; Simpson, E.; Olivier, P.; Foster, E. Field Testing of the Use of Intake24-An Online 24-Hour Dietary Recall System. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Eldridge, A.L.; Piernas, C.; Illner, A.K.; Gibney, M.J.; Gurinović, M.A.; de Vries, J.H.M.; Cade, J.E. Evaluation of New Technology-Based Tools for Dietary Intake Assessment—An ILSI Europe Dietary Intake and Exposure Task Force Evaluation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peters, M.D.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H.; McInerney, P.; Parker, D.; Soares, C.B. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Levac, D.; Colquhoun, H.; O’Brien, K.K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement. Sci. 2010, 5, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peters, M.D.J.; Marnie, C.; Tricco, A.C.; Pollock, D.; Munn, Z.; Alexander, L.; McInerney, P.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alcantara, F.B.; Corsi, G.C.; Schubert, C.M.R.; Lorenzi, A.; Mello, A.P.Q. A influência dos aplicativos de delivery de alimentos no hábito alimentar na região da grande São Paulo—SP. Rev. Eletrônica Acervo Saúde 2021, 13, e6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alves, M.A.; Souza, A.M.; Barufaldi, L.A.; Tavares, B.M.; Bloch, K.V.; Vasconcelos, F.A.G. Dietary patterns of Brazilian adolescents according to geographic region: An analysis of the Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents (ERICA). Cad. Saúde Pública. 2019, 35, e00153818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Azarias, H.G.A. Validade e Reprodutibilidade do Questionário de Frequência Alimentar Online com Suporte de Imagens da Coorte de Universidades Mineiras (PROJETO CUME). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2020. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/35872 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  28. Baldo, C.; Zanchim, M.C.; Ramos Kirsten, V.; Bertoletti De Marchi, A.C. Diabetes Food Control—A mobile application to evaluate the food consumption by diabetic patients. Rev. Eletron Comun. Inf. Inov. Saúde 2015, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barufaldi, L.A.; Abreu, G.A.; Veiga, G.V.; Sichieri, R.; Kuschnir, M.C.C.; Cunha, D.B.; Pereira, R.A.; Bloch, K.V. Software to record 24-hour food recall: Application in the Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2016, 19, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bel-Serrat, S.; Knaze, V.; Nicolas, G.; Marchioni, D.M.; Steluti, J.; Mendes, A.; Crispim, S.P.; Fisberg, R.M.; A Pereira, R.; Araujo, M.C.; et al. Adapting the standardised computer- and interview-based 24 h dietary recall method (GloboDiet) for dietary monitoring in Latin America. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 2847–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Boing, A.C.; Peres, K.G.; Boing, A.F.; Hallal, P.C.; Silva, N.N.; Peres, M.A. EpiFloripa Health Survey: The methodological and operational aspects behind the scenes. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2014, 17, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Borges, T.L.D. Registro Alimentar Fotografado: Desenvolvimento e Validação de Protocolo Para Pessoas com Deficiência Visual Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil, 2019. Available online: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/28756 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  33. Botelho, L.V. Ambiente Alimentar Digital: Estudo Descritivo Sobre o Uso de Aplicativos de Entrega de Comida Pronta Para Consumo Entre Residentes da Região Metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro. Dissertação de Mestrado, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021. Available online: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/47349 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  34. Vigitel Brazil 2006: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas Por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sócio-Demográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas Nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2006; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa: Brasília, Brazil, 2007; 298p, ISBN 978-85-334-1355-9. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vigitel Brazil 2007: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2007; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa: Brasília, Brazil, 2008; 144p. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2007.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  36. Vigitel Brazil 2008: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas Nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2008; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa: Brasília, Brazil, 2009; 554p, ISBN 978-85-334-1731-1.
  37. Vigitel Brazil 2009: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas Por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2009; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa: Brasília, Brazil, 2010; 150p, ISBN 978-85-334-2091-5.
  38. Vigitel Brazil 2010: Protective and Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa: Brasília, Brazil, 2014; 152p. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_2010.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  39. Vigitel Brazil 2011: Protective and Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2012; 134p. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2011.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  40. Vigitel Brazil 2012: Protective and Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2013; 136p, ISBN 978-85-334-2054-0.
  41. Vigitel Brazil 2013: Protective and Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2013; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2014; 166p, ISBN 978-85-334-2147-9.
  42. Vigitel Brazil 2014: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brasilian States and the Federal District in 2014; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2015; 154p, ISBN 978-85-334-2243-8.
  43. Vigitel Brazil 2015: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brasilian States and the Federal District in 2015; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2016; 162p, ISBN 978-85-334-2441-8.
  44. Vigitel Brazil 2016: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates Ofsociodemographic Frequency and Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brazilian States and the Federal District in 2016; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2017; 160p, ISBN 978-85-334-2615-3.
  45. Vigitel Brazil 2017: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brazilian States and the Federal District in 2017; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2018; 132p, ISBN 978-85-334-2615-3.
  46. Vigitel Brazil 2018: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brazilian States and the Federal District in 2018; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2019; 131p, ISBN 978-85-334-2705-1.
  47. Vigitel Brazil 2019: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brazilian States and the Federal District in 2019; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2020; 276p, ISBN 978-85-334-2765-5. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2019_vigilancia_fatores_risco.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  48. Vigitel Brazil 2020: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2020; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2021; 126p, ISBN 978-65-5993-122-4. Available online: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/svsa/vigitel/relatorio-vigitel-2020-original.pdf/view (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  49. Vigitel Brazil 2021: Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico. Estimativas Sobre Frequência e Distribuição Sociodemográfica de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas nas Capitais dos 26 Estados Brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2021; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde: Brasília, Brazil, 2022; 131p, ISBN 978-65-5993-195-8. Available online: www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/svsa/vigitel/vigitel-brasil-2021-estimativas-sobre-frequencia-e-distribuicao-sociodemografica-de-fatores-de-risco-e-protecao-para-doencas-cronicas (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  50. Caivano, S.; Colugnati, F.A.B.; Domene, S.M.A. Diet Quality Index associated with Digital Food Guide: Update and validation. Cad. Saude Publica 2019, 35, e00043419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Caivano, S.; Domene, S.M.A. Diet quality index for healthy food choices. Rev. Nutr. 2013, 26, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Caivano, S.; Ferreira, B.J.; Domene, S.M.Á. Evaluation of the usability of a mobile Digital Food Guide based on user perception. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2014, 19, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Claro, R.M.; Santos, M.A.S.; Oliveira, T.P.; Pereira, C.A.; Szwarcwald, C.L.; Malta, D.C. Unhealthy food consumption related to chronic noncommunicable diseases in Brazil: National Health Survey, 2013. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2015, 24, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Carvalho-Ferreira, J.P.; Finlayson, G.; Caldas, G.; Bandoni, D.; Rosso, V.V. Translation and adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire for Brazilian population. Obes. Facts. 2018, 11, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Costa, C.d.S.; de Faria, F.R.; Gabe, K.T.; Sattamini, I.F.; Khandpur, N.; Leite, F.H.M.; Steele, E.M.; Louzada, M.L.d.C.; Levy, R.B.; Monteiro, C.A. Nova score for the consumption of ultra-processed foods: Description and performance evaluation in Brazil. Rev. Saúde Pública 2021, 55, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Costa, C.D.S.; Dos Santos, F.S.; Gabe, K.T.; Steele, E.M.; Leite, F.H.M.; Khandpur, N.; Rauber, F.; da Costa Louzada, M.L.; Levy, R.B.; Monteiro, C.A. Description and Performance Evaluation of Two Diet Quality Scores Based on the Nova Classification System. medRxiv 2023, 1–23. Available online: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290255v1.full.pdf+html (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  57. Costa, F.F. Desenvolvimento e Avaliação de Um Questionário Baseado na Web Para Avaliar o Consumo Alimentar e a Atividade Física de Escolares. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2013. Available online: https://cev.org.br/biblioteca/desenvolvimento-avaliacao-um-questionario-baseado-web-para-avaliar-o-consumo-alimentar-e-atividade-fisica-escolares/ (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  58. Costa, F.F.; Schmoelz, C.P.; Davies, V.F.; Di Pietro, P.F.; Kupek, E.; de Assis, M.A.A. Assessment of diet and physical activity of Brazilian schoolchildren: Usability testing of a web-based questionnaire. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2013, 2, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Davies, V.F.; Kupek, E.; de Assis, M.A.; Natal, S.; Di Pietro, P.F.; Baranowski, T. Validation of a web-based questionnaire to assess the dietary intake of Brazilian children aged 7–10 years. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 28 (Suppl. S1), 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dias, G.C. Associação do Consumo Alimentar Com o Status de Ferro de Mulheres Saudáveis na Idade Reprodutiva [Internet] [Mestrado em Nutrição Experimental]. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2017. Available online: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/9/9132/tde-20072017-153058/ (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  61. Ducci, A.L.; Vannuchi, M.T.O.; De Souza, S.N.D.H.; Tacla, M.T.G.M.; Lima, L.S. Breastfeeding and food intake of children under one year in a city in southern Brazil. Rev. Bra. Pesq. Saúde 2013, 15, 49–58. Available online: https://periodicos.ufes.br/rbps/article/view/5579/4064 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  62. Duque, M. WhatsApp® Aplicado à Nutrição [Internet]. Pesquisa ESPM. 2020. Available online: https://pesquisa.espm.br/e-books/whatsapp-aplicado-a-nutricao/. (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  63. Engel, R.; de Assis, M.A.A.; Lobo, A.S.; Leal, D.B.; Vieira, F.G.K.; Di Pietro, P.F. Validation of the online version of the previous day food questionnaire for schoolchildren. Rev. Nutr. 2017, 30, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ferreira, N.L. Alimentação de Estudantes: Associação com Fatores Individuais, Familiares, Comportamentais e Indicadores Socioeconômicos. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2017. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/ANDO-ATLNJA (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  65. Folchetti, L.D.; da Silva, I.T.; de Almeida Pititto, B.; Ferreira, S.R. The e-NutriHS: A web-based system for a Brazilian cohort study. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2015, 216, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Folchetti, L.G.D. Desenvolvimento de Software Para o Monitoramento de Saúde no Nutritionists’ Health. Study. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2016. Available online: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/6/6138/tde-21122016-093651/publico/LucianaGavilanDiasFolchettiRESTRITAcompleta.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  67. Galante, A.P. Validade Relativa de um questionário semiquantitativo de frequência alimentar online para estimar ingestão de cálcio e ferro. [Dissertação de Mestrado]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2004. Available online: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/89/89131/tde-04032015-153818/publico/Andrea_Galante_Mestrado.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  68. Galante, A.P. Desenvolvimento e validação de um Método Computadorizado Para Avaliação do Consumo Alimentar, Preenchido por Indivíduos Adultos Utilizando a Web. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2007. Available online: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/89/89131/tde-11032013-155020/pt-br.php (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  69. Galante, A.P.; Colli, C. Development and use of an on-line semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire to evaluate calcium and iron intake. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2008, 11, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hinnig, P.F. Questionário de Frequência Alimentar Quantitativo Para Crianças de 7 a 10 Anos: Avaliação das Propriedades Psicométricas. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Organizador. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar, 2009; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009; 140p. Available online: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=4006-pense&category_slug=marco-2010-pdf&Itemid=30192 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  72. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar, 2012; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013; 256p. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101955 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  73. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar, 2015; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016; 131p. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?id=297870&view=detalhes (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  74. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar, 2019; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021; 166p. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/educacao/9134-pesquisa-nacional-de-saude-do-escolar.html (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  75. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2015; 75p. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/saude/29540-2013-pesquisa-nacional-de-saude.html (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  76. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2019: Ciclos de Vida; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021; 143p. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?id=2101846&view=detalhes (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  77. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios: Síntese de Indicadores, 2015; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016; 105p. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/populacao/9127-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios.html (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  78. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, 2017–2018: Análise do Consumo Alimentar; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020; 124p. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101742 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  79. Jesus, G.M.; Assis, M.A.A.; Kupek, E. Validity and reproducibility of an Internet-based questionnaire (Web-CAAFE) to evaluate the food consumption of students aged 7 to 15 years. Cad. Saúde Pública 2017, 33, e00163016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kac, G. Estudo Nacional de Alimentação e Nutrição Infantil. Manual de Instalação e Utilização do Aplicativo “Recordatório de 24 Horas” Rio de Janeiro [Internet]. Available online: https://enani.estudiomassa.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Manual-R24h-desacoplado-1.pdf. (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  81. Karnopp, E.V.N. Consumo de Alimentos Ultraprocessados e Sua Relação Com o Perfil Lipídico aos 18 Anos de Idade: Coorte de Nascimentos de 1993, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2016. Available online: http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/prefix/3926 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  82. Lacerda, E.M.A.; Boccolini, C.S.; Alves-Santos, N.H.; Castro, I.R.R.; Anjos, L.A.; Crispim, S.P.; da Costa, T.H.M.; Ferreira, M.M.d.M.; Farias, D.R.; Carneiro, L.B.V.; et al. Methodological aspects of the assessment of dietary intake in the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019): A population based household SURVEY. Cad. Saúde Pública 2021, 37, e00301420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lobo, A.S.; Assis, M.A.A.; Leal, D.B.; Borgatto, A.F.; Vieira, F.K.; Di Pietro, P.F.; Kupek, E. Empirically derived dietary patterns through latent profile analysis among Brazilian children and adolescents from Southern Brazil, 2013–2015. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maciel, F.F.C. Avaliação do Consumo de Alimentos Orgânicos Durante a Pandemia da COVID-19—PB. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil, 2022. Available online: http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/riufcg/23739 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  85. Medeiros, A.C.; Mainbourg, E.M. Food consumption profile of rural riverside populations. Rural. Remote Health 2023, 23, 7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Maia, E.G.; Silva LES da Santos, M.A.S.; Barufaldi, L.A.; Silva SU da Claro, R.M. Dietary patterns, sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics among Brazilian adolescents. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2018, 21 (Suppl. S1), e180009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Malta, D.C.; Silva, A.G.; Prates, E.J.S.; Alves, F.T.A.; Cristo, E.B.; Machado, Í.E. Convergence in alcohol abuse in Brazilian capitals between genders, 2006 to 2019: What population surveys show. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2021, 24, e210022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Maynard, D.C.; Anjos, H.A.; Magalhães, A.C.V.; Grimes, L.N.; Costa, M.G.O.; Santos, R.B. Food consumption and anxiety among the adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e4279119905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Meneghini, A.M.B.; Netto, L. Promotion of nutritional health in adolescents with falciform disease: A single case study. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e10010715982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mescoloto, S.B. Validação e Usabilidade de um Aplicativo Móvel Como Instrumento Para Estimar a Ingestão Alimentar Em Adultos. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2018. Available online: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53067 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  91. Mescoloto, S.B.; Caivano, S.; Domene, S.M.A. Evaluation of a mobile application for estimation of food intake. Rev. Nutr. 2017, 30, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Molina, M.C.B.; Faria, C.P.; Cardoso, L.O.; Drehmer, M.; Velasquez-Meléndez, J.G.; Gomes, A.L.C.; Melere, C.; Diniz, M.d.F.H.S.; Sichieri, R.; Benseñor, I.J.M. Diet assessment in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brazil): Development of a food frequency questionnaire. Rev. Nutr. 2013, 26, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Neri, D.; Gabe, K.T.; Santos Costa, C.D.; Steele, E.M.; Rauber, F.; Marchioni, D.M.; Louzada, M.L.; Levy, B.; Monteiro, C.A. A novel web-based 24-hour dietary recall tool in line with the Nova food processing classification: Description and evaluation. Nutrition 2023, 26, 1997–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Neves, A.F.G.B. Consumo de Bebidas Açucaradas e Associação Com Riscos Cardiovasculares em Adolescentes. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Paraíba, Brazil, 2019. Available online: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18496 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  95. Ochsenhofer, K. Validação de Um Questionário Semi-Quantitativo de Frequência Alimentar Online Para Ferro. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2007. Available online: https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/89/89131/tde-25092009-153721/pt-br.php (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  96. Oliveira, G.A.L.; Barrio, D.O.L.; Araújo, G.S.; Saldanha, M.P.; Schincaglia, R.M.; Gubert, M.B.; Toral, N. Validation of the illustrated questionnaire on food consumption for Brazilian schoolchildren (QUACEB) for 6- to 10-year-old children. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1051499. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1051499 (accessed on 26 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  97. Oliveira, J.S.; Barufaldi, L.A.; Abreu, G.d.A.; Leal, V.S.; Brunken, G.S.; Vasconcelos, S.M.L.; dos Santos, M.M.; Bloch, K.V. ERICA: Use of screens and consumption of meals and snacks by Brazilian adolescents. Rev. Saude Publica 2016, 50 (Suppl. S1), 7s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Oliveira, P.S.; Levy, J.; Carli, E.D.; Bensenor, I.J.M.; Lotufo, P.A.; Pereira, R.A.; Yokoo, E.M.; Sichieri, R.; Crispim, S.P.; Marchioni, D.M.L. Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brazil study. Cad. Saúde Pública 2022, 38, e00249821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ramos, J.F. Avaliação da Acurácia e Precisão de um Instrumento de Medição do Consumo Alimentar de Escolares do Município de Salesópolis—SP. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar e Nutriconal (Rede Penssan). I National Survey on Food Insecurity in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil. 2021. Available online: https://olheparaafome.com.br/VIGISAN_Inseguranca_alimentar.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  101. Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar e Nutriconal (Rede Penssan). II National Survey on Food Insecurity in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil. 2022. Available online: https://static.poder360.com.br/2022/06/seguranca-alimentar-covid-8jun-2022.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  102. Retondario, A.; Souza, A.M.; Fernandes, R.; Bricarello, L.P.; Alves, M.A.; Zeni, L.A.Z.R.; Trindade, E.B.d.M.; Vasconcelos, F.d.A.G.d. Usual intake and dietary sources of Selenium in adolescents: A cross-sectional school-based study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 33, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ruggeri, B.F.F.; Voci, S.M.; Borges, C.A.; Slater, B. Development of a structured and automated 24-hour Recall to evaluate dietary intake of schoolchildren. Nutrire 2012, 37, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ruggeri, B.F.F.; Voci, S.M.; Borges, C.A.; Slater, B. Assessment of the usability of a nutritional epidemiology computerized system. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2013, 16, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ruiz-Roso, M.B.R.; Padilha, P.C.; Mantilha-Escalante, D.C.; Ulloa, N.; Brun, P.; Acevedo-Correa, D.; Ferreira Peres, W.A.; Martorell, M.; Aires, M.T.; de Oliveira Cardoso, L.; et al. COVID-19 confinement and changes of adolescent’s dietary trends in Italy, Spain, Chile, Colombia and Brazil. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Santos, R.S.; Landim, L.A.S.R.; Almeida, J.L.J.; Sato, R.S.P. Aplicativo móvel para avaliação de comportamento alimentar: Desenvolvimento, usabilidade e aceitabilidade. Nutr. Bras. 2019, 18, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sattamini, I.F. Diet Quality Index Associated with Digital Food Guide: Update and Validation. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Silva, T.L.N.; Klein, C.H.; Souza, A.M.; Barufaldi, L.A.; Abreu, G.A.; Kuschnir, M.C.C.; de Vasconcellos, M.T.L.; Bloch, K.V. Response rate in the Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents—ERICA. Rev. Saúde Pública 2016, 50 (Suppl. S1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Silva, A.D.; Santos, D.M.; Silva, F.R.; Brito, A.S.; Brito, F.S.B. Development of the prototype of the digital form for Studies in Food, Nutrition, Health and Aging: EANSE FORMS. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e435101422091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Silva, D.G.; Cavalcante, E.B.; Souza, M.U.; Kobori, T.M.; Souza, T.J.; Santini, E. Estado Nutricional e Consumo Alimentar de Professores de Uma Instituição de Ensino Superior de Várzea Grande-MT. TCC—Nutrição [Internet]. 2021. Available online: https://www.repositoriodigital.univag.com.br/index.php/nutri/article/view/674. (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  111. Silva, D.M.C.; Santos, T.S.S.; Conde, W.L.; Slater, B. Nutritional status and metabolic risk in adults: Association with diet quality as assessed with ESQUADA. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2021, 24, e210019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Souza, A.M.; Barufaldi, L.A.; Abreu, G.A.; Giannini, D.T.; Oliveira, C.L.; Santos, M.M.; Leal, V.S.; Vasconcelos, F.D.A.G. ERICA: Intake of macro and micronutrients of Brazilian adolescents. Rev. Saúde Pública 2016, 50, 5s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Steele, E.M.; Rauber, F.; Costa, C.S.; Leite, M.A.; Gabe, K.T.; Louzada, M.L.C.; Levy, R.B.; Monteiro, C.A. Dietary changes in the NutriNet Brasil cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev. Saúde Pública 2020, 54, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Voci, S.M. Padrões Alimentares, Participação em Programas Sociais e Demais Fatores Associados à Insegurança Alimentar e Nutricional de Adolescentes de Escolas Públicas do Município de Piracicaba, São Paulo. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yamashita, L.M. Desenvolvimento e Validação de um Questionário de Frequência Alimentar Curto Para Estimar o Consumo Usual de FODMAPs (Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Dissaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 2019. Available online: https://www.oasisbr.ibict.br/vufind/Record/UNICAMP-30_160edb755e26566a0b95626497ac4923 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  116. Zanchim, M.C.; Kirsten, V.R.; De Marchi, A.C.B. Consumption of dietary intake markers by patients with diabetes assessed using a mobile application. Cien Saude Colet. 2018, 23, 4199–4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tabela Brasileira de Composição dos Alimentos (TBCA). Tabela Brasileira de Composição dos Alimentos (TBCA). Food Research Center (FoRC). 2020. Available online: http://www.tbca.net.br/ (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  118. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008–2009 Tabelas de Composição Nutricional dos Alimentos Consumidos no Brasil; Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2011; ISBN 9788524041945. [Google Scholar]
  119. Tabela Brasileira de Composição de Alimentos (TBCA). Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Food Research Center (FoRC). Versão 7.2. São Paulo, 2023. Available online: http://www.fcf.usp.br/tbca (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  120. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies [Internet]. 2019. Available online: http://www.ars.usda.gov/nea/bhnrc/fsrg (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  121. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Acesso à Internet e Posse de Telefone Móvel Celular Para Uso Pessoal-PNAD TIC; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021; ISBN 9788524045431. [Google Scholar]
  122. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil. Pesquisa Web Sobre o uso da Internet no Brasil Durante a Pandemia do Novo Coronavírus—Painel TIC COVID-19 [Internet]. Cetic.br—Centro Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação. 2021. Available online: https://cetic.br/publicacao/painel-tic-covid-19 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  123. Santana, J.R.; Teixeira, A.L.S.; Rapini, M.S.; Esperidião, F. Financiamento público à inovação no Brasil: Contribuição Para Uma Distribuição Regional Mais Equilibrada? Planej. E Políticas Públicas 2019, 52. Available online: www.ipea.gov.br/ppp/index.php/PPP/article/view/796 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  124. Long, J.D.; Littlefield, L.A.; Estep, G.; Martin, H.; Rogers, T.J.; Boswell, C.; Shriver, B.J.; Roman-Shriver, C.R. Evidence review of technology and dietary assessment. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2010, 7, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, 2008–2009; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2010; ISBN 978-85-240-4131-0. [Google Scholar]
  126. Slimani, N.; Casagrande, C.; Nicolas, G.; Freisling, H.; Huybrechts, I.; Ocké, M.C.; Niekerk, E.M.; Van Rossum, C.; Bellemans, M.; De Maeyer, M.; et al. The standardized computerized 24-h dietary recall method EPIC-Soft adapted for pan-European dietary monitoring. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65 (Suppl. S1), S5–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mulligan, A.A.; Luben, R.N.; Bhaniani, A.; Parry-Smith, D.J.; O’Connor, L.; Khawaja, A.P.; Forouhi, N.G.; Khaw, K.-T. A new tool for converting food frequency questionnaire data into nutrient and food group values: FETA research methods and availability. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e004503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 16 01399 g001
Figure 1. Process of identification and inclusion in this study: PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. Process of identification and inclusion in this study: PRISMA flow diagram.
Nutrients 16 01399 g001
Nutrients 16 01399 g002
Figure 2. Distribution of the regional studies of the studies in Brazil by region.
Figure 2. Distribution of the regional studies of the studies in Brazil by region.
Nutrients 16 01399 g002
Nutrients 16 01399 g003
Figure 3. Distribution of the types of studies by year. (The numbers shown in the figure are the absolute frequencies (n) of the studies per year).
Figure 3. Distribution of the types of studies by year. (The numbers shown in the figure are the absolute frequencies (n) of the studies per year).
Nutrients 16 01399 g003
Nutrients 16 01399 g004
Figure 4. Distribution of the types of Food Consumption Assessment Methods.
Figure 4. Distribution of the types of Food Consumption Assessment Methods.
Nutrients 16 01399 g004
Table 1. Description of the PCC strategy and main terms used.
Table 1. Description of the PCC strategy and main terms used.
PCC StrategyDecs TermsMESH TermsEmtree Terms
Population:
Brazilian individuals of all age groups		adulto OR criança OR idoso OR adolescente OR gestante AND Brasiladults OR child OR aged OR adolescent OR pregnant AND Braziladult OR child OR adolescent OR pregnant OR aged AND Brazilian
Concept:
Digital questionnaires		“inquéritos e questionários” OR “inquéritos sobre dietas” OR inquéritos nutricionais AND software OR tecnologia“Surveys and questionnaires” AND software OR electronic health records technology OR software AND questionnaire
Context:
Assessment of food consumption and nutritional surveys in Brazil		“Consumo de alimentos” OR “ingestão de alimentos” OR “registros de dieta” AND Brasil“Diet records” OR “nutrition surveys” OR “nutrition assessment” OR “healthy surveys” OR eating AND BrazilBrazil AND food intake OR dietary intake
Source: author. DeCs: Health Sciences Descriptors, MESH: Medical Subject Headings; Emtree: Embase subject heading.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, A.d.S.d.; Brito, F.d.S.B.; Santos, D.M.d.; Adegboye, A.R.A. Use of Digital Tools for the Assessment of Food Consumption in Brazil: A Scoping Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091399

AMA Style

Silva AdSd, Brito FdSB, Santos DMd, Adegboye ARA. Use of Digital Tools for the Assessment of Food Consumption in Brazil: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2024; 16(9):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Adriane dos Santos da, Flávia dos Santos Barbosa Brito, Debora Martins dos Santos, and Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye. 2024. "Use of Digital Tools for the Assessment of Food Consumption in Brazil: A Scoping Review" Nutrients 16, no. 9: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop