Poor Mobilization-Associated Factors in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Harvest
by
, , , , , and
Won Kee Ahn
1,†
,
Hyun-Jun Nam
2,†,
Hae Won Lee
1,
Seungmin Hahn
1,
Jung Woo Han
1,
Chuhl Joo Lyu
1,
Sinyoung Kim
2,
Soon Sung Kwon
2,*,
Haerim Chung
3,*,
Jin Seok Kim
3,
June-Won Cheong
3 and
Kyung-A Lee
2 1
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
3
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2024, 16(10), 1821; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101821
Submission received: 5 April 2024
/
Revised: 29 April 2024
/
Accepted: 7 May 2024
/
Published: 10 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
This study aims to describe the factors associated with poor mobilization in patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest. Poor mobilization was observed in 30.5% of the patients included in the investigation. While older age, myelotoxic agents, and low platelet counts were associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases, a history of radiation therapy to the spine and pelvic region was associated with mobilization failure in patients with non-hematologic diseases. In patients who received plerixafor, 14.2% suffered from mobilization failure, with differences in hemoglobin, platelet counts, and mobilization regimens noted between the poor and good mobilization groups. Identifying potential risk factors for poor mobilization in specific groups of patients will aid in planning therapy and ensuring successful transplantation in those requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplants.
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is an important therapeutic measure for both hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. For PBSCT to be successful, sufficient CD34+ cells need to be mobilized and harvested. Although risk factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases have been reported, studies of patients with non-hematologic diseases and those receiving plerixafor are rare. To identify factors associated with poor mobilization, data from autologous PBSC harvest (PBSCH) in 491 patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. A multivariate analysis revealed that in patients with a hematologic disease, an age older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.655, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.049–2.611, p = 0.008), the use of myelotoxic agents (OR 4.384, 95% CI 2.681–7.168, p < 0.001), and a low platelet count (OR 2.106, 95% CI 1.205–3.682, p = 0.009) were associated with poor mobilization. In patients with non-hematologic diseases, a history of radiation on the pelvis/spine was the sole associated factor (OR 12.200, 95% CI 1.934–76.956, p = 0.008). Among the group of patients who received plerixafor, poor mobilization was observed in 19 patients (19/134, 14.2%) and a difference in the mobilization regimen was noted among the good mobilization group. These results show that the risk factors for poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases and those receiving plerixafor differ from those in patients with hematologic diseases; as such, non-hematologic patients require special consideration to enable successful PBSCH.
1. Introduction
Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is an important therapeutic measure for patients with various clinical conditions, including hematologic malignancies, solid cancers, and inborn errors of immunity. Before PBSCT, a peripheral blood stem cell harvest (PBSCH) is performed using apheresis techniques to collect the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to be transplanted. Both autologous and allogeneic PBSCT can be used depending on the individual patient’s condition and treatment objectives. Studies of the outcomes of PBSCT have been conducted based on the number of infused CD34+ cells, and 2–5 × 106 cells/kg of the recipient’s body weight has been suggested as the optimal collection amount for a successful transplantation outcome [1,2,3]. Because the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells is important for successful transplantation, CD34+ cell mobilization using G-CSF and chemotherapy prior to PBSCH is a pivotal step.
In autologous PBSCH, cells are collected from patients themselves. Therefore, autologous PBSCH has a higher incidence of collection failure than allogeneic PBSCH, which harvests cells from healthy donors. Previous studies reported that the incidence of poor mobilization ranged from 15–32% [4,5,6,7]. When sufficient CD34+ cells cannot be collected, the patient must either undergo re-harvest or be treated with other options. These cause inconvenience and sometimes worsen clinical outcomes [8,9,10,11]. Previous studies have reported various factors associated with mobilization failure, and some researchers have developed methods to predict CD34+ cell collection yield [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Despite the numerous studies conducted on PBSCH, most have focused on patients with hematologic malignancies. Although a large proportion of patients undergoing PBSCH have hematologic malignancies, a significant number of patients undergo PBSCH for other reasons [20,21]. Therefore, investigating the failure rates and factors associated with failure in those patient groups is beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with mobilization failure in patients undergoing PBSCH. The patients included those with hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. Cases in which mobilization failure occurred despite the use of plerixafor were also included.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients
Clinical data and laboratory test results of patients who underwent autologous PBSCH at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between January 2018 and October 2023 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Yonsei University Health System (4-2023-0875). The need for informed consent was waived by the IRB because this study was retrospective.
2.2. Mobilization and Collection Procedures
All patients received chemotherapy as part of our institution’s disease-specific protocol. Following the completion of the last cycle, G-CSF treatment was initiated immediately before bone marrow recovery. In patients with a hematologic disease and those whose protocol excluded alkylating drugs, G-CSF alone was used for mobilization. For patients with hematologic malignancies involving alkylating agents and all patients with non-hematologic malignancies, chemotherapy plus G-CSF therapy were utilized for mobilization. Mobilization chemotherapy regimens were grouped and included cyclophosphamide (≥2000 mg/m2), etoposide (≥300 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide plus etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine groups. A detailed mobilization chemotherapy regimen is demonstrated in Supplementary Table S1.
Plerixafor was given in cases of expected harvest failure to adult patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM) and to pediatric patients with NHL or solid tumors. The expected failure criteria were a peripheral blood CD34+ cell count below 10 cells/μL or a harvest product CD34+ cell count below 0.7 × 106 cells/kg for NHL patients and a count below 15 cells/μL or below 1.0 × 106 cells/kg for adults with MM and pediatric patients with solid tumors.
Stem cell collection procedures were conducted using Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Tokyo, Japan) with the continuous mononuclear cell collection program. The total processed volume was 2–4 times the total blood volume. For anticoagulation, acid citrate dextrose solution-A (ACD-A) mixed with heparin (3000 IU/500 mL ACD-A) was used in a 1:24 ratio to blood.
2.3. Variables and Definition
We collected the following clinical data: demographics, diagnoses (classified as hematologic and non-hematologic disease), number of chemotherapy cycles and drugs used, laboratory parameters, bone marrow biopsy findings, use of mobilization chemotherapy or G-CSF alone, and a recent history of pelvic or spinal radiotherapy.
For the analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization, continuous values were categorized into two groups. Cutoff values for categorization were determined based on the median value of each variable. The myelotoxic agents were doxorubicin, lenalidomide, and melphalan. Poor mobilization was defined as either the use of plerixafor or the failure to collect 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg throughout the entire harvest duration. In the plerixafor use group, failure to collect 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was defined as poor mobilization.
2.4. Statistics
For continuous variables, data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). For categorical variables, frequencies with percentages are presented. If appropriate, unpaired t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare differences in continuous variables between the poor and good mobilization groups. For categorical variables, chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare differences between groups. A logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with poor mobilization. Factors that were significantly associated with poor mobilization in the univariate analyses were subsequently included in the multivariable analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) with p-values of <0.05 considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics
We analyzed data from 491 patients who underwent autologous PBSCH. The characteristics of the patients are detailed in Table 1. Among them, 419 patients underwent autologous PBSCH due to hematologic diseases, and 72 patients underwent autologous PBSCH to treat non-hematologic diseases. Among the 150 poor mobilizers (30.5%), 144 patients had hematologic diseases and 6 had non-hematologic diseases. Detailed diagnostic information is summarized in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. The median age of the poor mobilizers was 60 years; 144 of these patients (96.0%) were older than 20 years and 74 patients (49.3%) were older than 60 years. In the poor mobilization group, the median number of chemotherapy cycles was five (IQR 4–7), and 102 patients (68.0%) were treated with myelotoxic agents. Fourteen patients (9.3%) had a history of radiation therapy that included the spinal and/or pelvic region prior to the autologous PBSCH. Bone marrow involvement at the time of harvest was identified in 22 patients (14.7%). On the day mobilization was initiated, hemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC) counts did not differ significantly between the poor and good mobilization groups; but the platelet count was significantly lower in the poor mobilization group. Mobilization with G-CSF alone was used in 111 patients (74.0%), and chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilization was used in 39 patients (26.0%). The median number of peripheral CD34+ cells on day 1 of harvest was 5/μL (IQR 2–8), and the number harvested on day 1 was 0.45 × 106/kg (IQR 0.20–0.71). Plerixafor was used in 134 patients (89.3%).
3.2. Factors Associated with Poor Mobilization in Patients with Hematologic and Non-Hematologic Diseases
For all patients included in this study, factors associated with poor mobilization were investigated (Table 2). In the univariate analysis, an age older than 20 years, the presence of hematologic disease, a number of chemotherapy cycles >6, the use of myelotoxic agents, a platelet count <150,000/μL on mobilization day 1, and a diagnosis to mobilization period of >200 days were significantly associated with poor mobilization. Among those factors, an age older than 20 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.336, a 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.131–16.623, p = 0.032), the use of myelotoxic agents (OR 4.093, 95% CI 2.571–6.516, p < 0.001), and a platelet count <150,000/μL (OR 2.687, 95% CI 1.624–4.445, p < 0.001) on mobilization day 1 were associated with poor mobilization in the multivariate analysis.
Due to differences in the characteristics of patients with hematologic diseases and those with non-hematologic diseases, factors associated with poor mobilization were analyzed in each patient group. The detailed characteristics of each group are summarized in Supplementary Table S4. In the hematologic disease group, the factors associated with poor mobilization were an age older than 60 years (OR 1.655, 95% CI 1.049–2.611, p = 0.030), the use of myelotoxic agents (OR 4.384, 95% CI 2.681–7.168, p < 0.001), and platelet count <150,000/μL on mobilization day 1 (OR 2.106, 95% CI 1.205–3.682, p = 0.009, Table 3).
Intriguingly, factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases did not show associations with poor mobilization in those with non-hematologic diseases. A history of radiation therapy on the spine and/or pelvic region was the sole factor associated with poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases (OR 12.200, 95% CI 1.934–76.956, p = 0.008, Table 4).
3.3. Mobilization Failure in the Plerixafor Treatment Group
Patients whose PBSCH was predicted to fail based on the results of harvest day 1 received plerixafor. Of the 134 patients treated with plerixafor, PBSCH failed in 19 patients (14.2%). Among the factors included in the analysis, the hemoglobin and platelet counts on mobilization day 1 and the mobilization regimen differed significantly between the poor and good mobilization groups (Table 5).
4. Discussion
Studies of PBSCH have reported several factors associated with poor mobilization [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]: older age, low hemoglobin level, low platelet count, low WBC count, mobilization regimen, diagnosis of NHL, bone marrow involvement, previous PBSCH failure, previous use of myelotoxic agents, number of chemotherapy cycles, time from diagnosis to harvest, bone marrow cellularity, and peripheral CD34+ cell count. Among these factors, the pre-harvest peripheral CD34+ cell count measured after mobilization is the strongest indicator of the overall CD34+ cell yield. Thus, many groups use pre-harvest peripheral CD34+ cell count to predict mobilization failure. Despite its high correlation, pre-harvest peripheral CD34+ cell count is a result of mobilization rather than a predictor of collection yield. To make a timely decision at the beginning of mobilization, indicators other than the pre-harvest peripheral CD34+ cell count may be more useful. For example, an earlier study suggested a scoring system that used patient characteristics, history, disease status, and pre-mobilization laboratory parameters to predict collection success before the start of mobilization. Even without including the peripheral CD34+ cell count, that model effectively predicted CD34+ cell collection [13].
In our cohort, patient age, the use of a myelotoxic agent, and pre-mobilization platelet count were significantly associated with poor mobilization. A subgroup analysis of patients with hematologic diseases showed the same results, which are consistent with previous studies. Because patients with non-hematologic diseases exhibit different characteristics, especially patient age, with patients with hematologic diseases, a subgroup analysis of patients with non-hematologic diseases was also conducted. These analyses suggest that the risk factors for poor mobilization in patients differ from the risk factors in patients with hematologic diseases. These differences may stem from characteristics associated with non-hematologic diseases but could also be influenced by other factors such as patient demographics (e.g., age and sex) and variations in treatment protocols like chemotherapy regimens and mobilization strategies.
To the best of our knowledge, only a few previous studies considered risk factors for poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases [20,21]. In those studies, disease status and a history of radiation were identified as risk factors for poor mobilization. Although radiotherapy is safe for cancer patients, caution is warranted in relation to local radiotherapy for symptomatic sites due to the risk of bone marrow aplasia [22]. Furthermore, in cases such as malignant embryonal brain tumors or germ cell tumors, prophylactic craniospinal irradiation can be an indicator for preventing disseminated diseases. However, extended field radiotherapy involving bone marrow has been linked to poor harvest outcomes because of the destruction of sinusoidal vessels and the replacement of hematopoietic stem cells by adipocytes [23]. Consistent with these findings, our study also identified a previous history of radiation therapy as the only factor associated with poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases [24].
Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, has been used in combination with G-CSF for effective mobilization. The efficacy of plerixafor as an upfront administrator for PBSCH has been demonstrated, as has its use as a rescue agent when mobilization with G-CSF fails. Although the data vary among study populations, the use of plerixafor is associated with successful mobilization in 68–100% of patients [25,26]. In our patient cohort, 14.1% of patients who received plerixafor suffered PBSCH failure, which is consistent with previous reports. In the poor mobilization group, among patients receiving plerixafor, there were significant differences in hemoglobin level, platelet count, and mobilization regimen. Further study is necessary to specify and confirm the predictive factors for poor mobilization in patients who are administered plerixafor.
This study has some limitations. Relatively few patients were included in the subgroup analyses, and this limited the statistical power. Additionally, the lack of standardization in the mobilization chemotherapy regimen prevented us from comparing the efficacy of mobilization chemotherapy with G-CSF alone. Furthermore, a previous report showed that daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody of CD38 that has been used for patients with MM, is associated with low PBSCH efficiency [27]. However, although patients with MM were included in our cohort, the association with daratumumab could not be assessed due to the small number of patients who received it.
In conclusion, this study identified the potential risk factors of poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases and non-hematologic diseases, as well as treatment with plerixafor that was not previously established. For patients eligible for autologous PBSCT, special consideration should be given to mobilization strategy selection to preemptively avoid risk factors for poor mobilization.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers16101821/s1, Table S1: Mobilization chemotherapy regimen; Table S2: Detailed diagnosis of patients with hematologic diseases; Table S3: Detailed diagnosis of patients with non-hematologic diseases; Table S4: Detailed characteristics of patients with hematologic and non-hematologic diseases.
Author Contributions
S.S.K. and H.C. conceptualized the study and developed the methodology; W.K.A., H.-J.N., H.W.L., S.H., S.S.K. and H.C. curated data and performed analyses; J.W.H., C.J.L., S.K., J.S.K., J.-W.C. and K.-A.L. administered the project and supervised the study; W.K.A. and H.-J.N. drafted the manuscript; J.W.H., C.J.L., S.K., S.S.K., H.C., J.S.K., J.-W.C. and K.-A.L. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by a grant of the Manufacturing Human Cell-based Artificial Blood and Platform Technology Development for Transfusion, funded by the Multi-Ministrial Research Project, Republic of Korea (grant number: HX23C1706).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System (4-2023-0875; date of approval 26 August 2023).
Informed Consent Statement
The need for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System because this study was retrospective.
Data Availability Statement
The de-identified data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Duong, H.K.; Savani, B.N.; Copelan, E.; Devine, S.; Costa, L.J.; Wingard, J.R.; Shaughnessy, P.; Majhail, N.; Perales, M.-A.; Cutler, C.S.; et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014, 20, 1262–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jillella, A.P.; Ustun, C. What is the optimum number of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells for an autologous transplant? Stem Cells Dev. 2004, 13, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cutler, C.; Antin, J.H. Peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation: A review. Stem Cells 2001, 19, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wuchter, P.; Ran, D.; Bruckner, T.; Schmitt, T.; Witzens-Harig, M.; Neben, K.; Goldschmidt, H.; Ho, A.D. Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pavone, V.; Gaudio, F.; Console, G.; Vitolo, U.; Iacopino, P.; Guarini, A.; Liso, V.; Perrone, T.; Liso, A. Poor mobilization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with malignant lymphomas treated by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006, 37, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, K.H.; Jung, S.K.; Kim, S.J.; Jang, J.H.; Kim, K.; Kim, W.S.; Jung, C.W.; Kim, D.W.; Kang, E.S. Incidence and risk factors of poor mobilization in adult autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: A single-centre experience. Vox Sang. 2014, 107, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perseghin, P.; Terruzzi, E.; Dassi, M.; Baldini, V.; Parma, M.; Coluccia, P.; Accorsi, P.; Confalonieri, G.; Tavecchia, L.; Verga, L.; et al. Management of poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization: Incidence, predictive factors, alternative strategies and outcome. A retrospective analysis on 2177 patients from three major Italian institutions. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2009, 41, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yiğenoğlu, T.N.; Başcı, S.; Ulu, B.U.; Bakırtaş, M.; Kılınç, A.; Şahin, D.; Darçın, T.; Yıldız, J.; Baysal, N.A.; İskender, D.; et al. Inferior prognosis in poor mobilizing myeloma patients. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2020, 59, 102722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miyamoto-Nagai, Y.; Mimura, N.; Tsukada, N.; Aotsuka, N.; Ri, M.; Katsuoka, Y.; Wakayama, T.; Suzuki, R.; Harazaki, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; et al. Outcomes of poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilizers with multiple myeloma at the first mobilization: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan. eJHaem 2022, 3, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordan, L.; Sugrue, M.; Lynch, J.; Williams, K.; Khan, S.; Wingard, J.; Moreb, J. Poor mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells is a risk factor for worse outcome in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Leuk. Lymphoma 2003, 44, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreb, J.S.; Byrne, M.; Shugarman, I.; Zou, F.; Xiong, S.; May, W.S.; Norkin, M.; Hiemenz, J.; Brown, R.; Cogle, C.; et al. Poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization affects long-term outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. J. Clin. Apher. 2018, 33, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pozotrigo, M.; Adel, N.; Landau, H.; Lesokhin, A.; Lendvai, N.; Chung, D.J.; Chimento, D.; Riedel, E.; Chen, X.; Reich, L.; et al. Factors impacting stem cell mobilization failure rate and efficiency in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: Experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olivieri, J.; Attolico, I.; Nuccorini, R.; Pascale, S.P.; Chiarucci, M.; Poiani, M.; Corradini, P.; Farina, L.; Gaidano, G.; Nassi, L.; et al. Predicting failure of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before it starts: The predicted poor mobilizer (pPM) score. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018, 53, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Auner, H.W.; Mazzarella, L.; Cook, L.; Szydlo, R.; Saltarelli, F.; Pavlu, J.; Bua, M.; Giles, C.; Apperley, J.F.; Rahemtulla, A. High rate of stem cell mobilization failure after thalidomide and oral cyclophosphamide induction therapy for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011, 46, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goker, H.; Ciftciler, R.; Demiroglu, H.; Turgut, M.; Sayınalp, N.; Haznedaroglu, I.; Okay, M.; Tekin, F.; Buyukasık, Y. Predictive factors for stem cell mobilization failure in multiple myeloma patients: A single center experience. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2020, 59, 102595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, G.; Skert, C.; Morello, E.; Almici, C.; Arcaini, L.; Basilico, C.; Cavalli, L.; Botto, B.; Castelli, A.; Pica, G.; et al. PBSC mobilization in lymphoma patients: Analysis of risk factors for collection failure and development of a predictive score based on the kinetics of circulating CD34+ cells and WBC after chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilization. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 33, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsu, T.-L.; Tsai, C.-K.; Liu, C.-Y.; Yeh, C.-M.; Lin, F.-L.; Hsiao, L.-T.; Liu, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Ko, P.-S.; Lin, T.-A.; et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Multiple Myeloma Patients. Transfus. Med. Hemotherapy 2022, 50, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Özkurt, Z.N.; Yeǧin, Z.A.; Suyanı, E.; Akı, Z.; Acar, K.; Yaǧcı, M.; Sucak, G.T. Factors affecting stem cell mobilization for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Clin. Apher. 2010, 25, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truong, T.H.; Prokopishyn, N.L.; Luu, H.; Guilcher, G.M.T.; Lewis, V.A. Predictive factors for successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in children. J. Clin. Apher. 2019, 34, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malinowska, I.; Romiszewski, M.; Smalisz, K.; Emmel, A.S.; Adamska, B.N.; Krol, M.; Urbanowska, E.; Brozyna, A.; Dembowska, B.B. Plerixafor combined with G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in children qualified for autologous transplantation- single center experience. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2021, 60, 103077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passweg, J.R.; Baldomero, H.; Chabannon, C.; Basak, G.W.; de la Cámara, R.; Corbacioglu, S.; Dolstra, H.; Duarte, R.; Glass, B.; Greco, R.; et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy survey of the EBMT: Monitoring of activities and trends over 30 years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021, 56, 1651–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bensinger, W.; Appelbaum, F.; Rowley, S.; Storb, R.; Sanders, J.; Lilleby, K.; Gooley, T.; Demirer, T.; Schiffman, K.; Weaver, C. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. J. Clin. Oncol. 1995, 13, 2547–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Lazarus, H.M.; Dahi, P.B.; Avecilla, S.; Giralt, S.A. Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization. Blood Rev. 2021, 47, 100771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demirer, T.; Buckner, C.D.; Gooley, T.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Rowley, S.; Chauncey, T.; Lilleby, K.; Storb, R.; I Bensinger, W. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996, 17, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lanza, F.; Lemoli, R.M.; Olivieri, A.; Laszlo, D.; Martino, M.; Specchia, G.; Pavone, V.; Imola, M.; Pasini, A.; Milone, G.; et al. Factors affecting successful mobilization with plerixafor: An Italian prospective survey in 215 patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma. Transfusion 2014, 54, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chabannon, C.; Bijou, F.; Miclea, J.; Milpied, N.; Grouin, J.; Mohty, M. A nationwide survey of the use of plerixafor in patients with lymphoid malignancies who mobilize poorly demonstrates the predominant use of the “on-demand” scheme of administration at French autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant programs. Transfusion 2015, 55, 2149–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hulin, C.; Offner, F.; Moreau, P.; Roussel, M.; Belhadj, K.; Benboubker, L.; Caillot, D.; Facon, T.; Garderet, L.; Kuhnowski, F.; et al. Stem cell yield and transplantation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving daratumumab + bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone in the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study. Haematologica 2021, 106, 2257–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest.
| Factors | Poor (n = 150) | Good (n = 341) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | 60 (53–64) | 57 (32–62) | <0.001 |
| >20 | 144 (96.0) | 273 (80.1) | <0.001 |
| >60 | 74 (49.3) | 107 (31.4) | <0.001 |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Hematologic | 144 (96.0) | 275 (80.6) | <0.001 |
| Non-hematologic | 6 (4.0) | 66 (19.4) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 76 (50.7) | 198 (58.1) | 0.139 |
| Female | 74 (49.3) | 143 (41.9) | |
| Weight | 63.5 (54.0–71.5) | 62.1 (54.0–72.1) | 0.012 |
| Number of chemotherapy cycles | 5 (4–7) | 4 (4–6) | 0.023 |
| Prior use of myelotoxic agents | 102 (68.0) | 103 (30.2) | <0.001 |
| Radiotherapy (spine/pelvis) | 14 (9.3) | 20 (5.9) | 0.178 |
| Bone marrow involvement | 22 (14.7) | 53 (15.5) | 0.892 |
| Laboratory parameters * | |||
| Hemoglobin | 10.4 (9.1–11.6) | 10.6 (9.1–12.2) | 0.139 |
| White blood cells | 4.05 (2.73–5.09) | 4.20 (2.53–5.71) | 0.444 |
| Platelets | 171 (112–215) | 219 (140–288) | <0.001 |
| Diagnosis to mobilization (days) | 173 (144–253) | 159 (130–200) | 0.261 |
| Mobilization regimen | |||
| G-CSF alone | 111 (74.0) | 227 (66.6) | 0.102 |
| Chemotherapy + G-CSF | 39 (26.0) | 114 (33.4) | |
| Pre-CD34+ cells | 5 (2–8) | 30 (16–60) | <0.001 |
| Product CD34+ cells, first day | 0.45 (0.20–0.71) | 2.88 (1.79–4.90) | <0.001 |
| Total CD34+ cells | 3.39 (2.10–4.99) | 6.55 (4.66–9.29) | <0.001 |
| Use of plerixafor | 134 (89.3) | - | <0.001 |
* Laboratory parameters were measured on mobilization day 1.
Table 2.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization.
| Factor | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Age > 20 years | 5.978 (2.533–14.110) | <0.001 | 4.336 (1.131–16.623) | 0.032 |
| Sex, female | 1.348 (0.917–1.983) | 0.129 | ||
| Hematologic disease (vs. non-hematologic diseases) | 4.919 (2.307–10.491) | <0.001 | 2.337 (0.603–9.052) | 0.219 |
| Weight, >60 kg | 1.072 (0.727–1.580) | 0.727 | ||
| Number of chemotherapy cycles, >6 | 1.956 (1.234–3.100) | 0.004 | 0.756 (0.394–1.453) | 0.401 |
| Myelotoxic agent | 4.910 (3.247–7.426) | <0.001 | 4.093 (2.571–6.516) | <0.001 |
| Radiotherapy (spine/pelvis) | 1.652 (0.811–3.367) | 0.167 | ||
| Bone marrow involvement | 0.934 (0.545–1.601) | 0.804 | ||
| Hemoglobin on mobilization day 1, <10.5 g/dL | 1.280 (0.870–1.883) | 0.210 | ||
| White blood cells on mobilization day 1, <4000/μL | 1.141 (0.777–1.676) | 0.501 | ||
| Platelets on mobilization day 1, <150,000/μL | 1.655 (1.105–2.478) | 0.015 | 2.687 (1.624–4.445) | <0.001 |
| Diagnosis to mobilization, >200 days | 1.905 (1.262–2.877) | 0.002 | 1.331 (0.776–2.281) | 0.299 |
| Mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF (vs. G-CSF alone) | 0.700 (0.456–1.074) | 0.102 | ||
Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases.
Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases.
| Factor | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Age > 60 years | 1.660 (1.105–2.493) | 0.015 | 1.655 (1.049–2.611) | 0.030 |
| Sex, female | 1.328 (0.886–1.990) | 0.169 | ||
| Diagnosis | ||||
| Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | 2.617 (1.727–3.965) | <0.001 | 1.947 (0.593–6.391) | 0.272 |
| Multiple myeloma | 0.437 (0.288–0.663) | <0.001 | 1.014 (0.303–3.385) | 0.983 |
| Weight, >60 kg | 1.320 (0.870–2.001) | 0.191 | ||
| Number of chemotherapy cycles, >6 | 2.182 (1.3277–3.589) | 0.002 | 0.557 (0.275–1.127) | 0.104 |
| Myelotoxic agent | 4.749 (3.070–7.348) | <0.001 | 4.384 (2.681–7.168) | <0.001 |
| Radiotherapy (spine/pelvis) | 1.434 (0.641–3.208) | 0.381 | ||
| Bone marrow involvement | 1.171 (0.654–2.097) | 0.596 | ||
| Hemoglobin on mobilization day 1, <10.5 g/dL | 1.827 (1.216–2.747) | 0.004 | 0.988 (0.556–1.628) | 0.878 |
| White blood cells on mobilization day 1, <4000/μL | 1.702 (1.131–2.562) | 0.011 | 0.988 (0.595–1.640) | 0.962 |
| Platelets on mobilization day 1, <150,000/μL | 2.987 (1.881–4.744) | <0.001 | 2.106 (1.205–3.682) | 0.009 |
| Diagnosis to mobilization, >200 days | 1.957 (1.266–3.025) | 0.003 | 1.520 (0.862–2.682) | 0.148 |
| Mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF (vs. G-CSF alone) | 1.295 (0.795–2.108) | 0.299 | ||
Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases.
Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases.
| Factors | Univariate | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Age > 10 years | 5.765 (0.968–34.348) | 0.054 |
| Sex, female | 0.374 (0.041–3.395) | 0.382 |
| Weight, >30 kg | 5.333 (0.898–31.680) | 0.066 |
| Number of chemotherapy cycles, >6 | 1.700 (0.283–10.206) | 0.562 |
| Myelotoxic agent | 0.900 (0.096–8.423) | 0.926 |
| Radiotherapy (spine/pelvis) | 12.200 (1.934–76.956) | 0.008 |
| Bone marrow involvement | 0.533 (0.058–4.883) | 0.578 |
| Hemoglobin on mobilization day 1, <9 g/dL | 0.435 (0.081–2.343) | 0.332 |
| White blood cells on mobilization day 1, <3500/μL | 0.179 (0.031–1.013) | 0.052 |
| Platelets on mobilization day 1, <130,000/μL | 2.174 (0.238–19.822) | 0.491 |
| Diagnosis to mobilization, >200 days | 1.441 (0.242–8.587) | 0.688 |
| Mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF (vs. G-CSF alone) | 0.410 (0.040–4.223) | 0.454 |
Table 5.
Characteristics of patients who used plerixafor and underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest.
Table 5.
Characteristics of patients who used plerixafor and underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest.
| Poor (n = 19) | Good (n = 115) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | 61 (58–67) | 60 (53–64) | 0.645 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 12 (63.2) | 57 (49.6) | 0.327 |
| Female | 7 (36.8) | 58 (50.4) | |
| Weight | 63.3 (53.5–69.1) | 64.8 (55.8–72.6) | 0.536 |
| Number of chemotherapy cycles | 6 (4–10) | 5 (4–6) | 0.208 |
| Myelotoxic agent | 14 (73.7) | 81 (70.4) | 1.000 |
| Radiotherapy (spine/pelvis) | 0 (0.0) | 11 (9.6) | 0.363 |
| Bone marrow involvement | 1 (5.3) | 16 (13.9) | 0.465 |
| Laboratory parameters * | |||
| Hemoglobin | 9.2 (8.1–10.7) | 10.5 (9.4–11.8) | 0.015 |
| White blood cells | 3.21 (1.58–5.07) | 4.15 (2.91–5.09) | 0.216 |
| Platelets | 126 (59–201) | 175 (121–225) | 0.016 |
| Diagnosis to mobilization (days) | 174 (146–287) | 173 (144–229) | 0.912 |
| Mobilization regimen | |||
| G-CSF alone | 9 (47.4) | 95 (82.6) | 0.002 |
| Chemotherapy + G-CSF | 10 (52.6) | 20 (17.4) | |
| Pre-CD34+ cells | 1 (0–3) | 6 (3–8) | 0.004 |
| Product CD34+ cells, first day | 0.07 (0.05–0.23) | 0.50 (0.30–0.74) | <0.001 |
| Total CD34+ cells | 0.79 (0.27–1.46) | 4.14 (3.13–5.65) | <0.001 |
* Laboratory parameters were measured on mobilization day 1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ahn, W.K.; Nam, H.-J.; Lee, H.W.; Hahn, S.; Han, J.W.; Lyu, C.J.; Kim, S.; Kwon, S.S.; Chung, H.; Kim, J.S.; et al. Poor Mobilization-Associated Factors in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Harvest. Cancers 2024, 16, 1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101821
AMA Style
Ahn WK, Nam H-J, Lee HW, Hahn S, Han JW, Lyu CJ, Kim S, Kwon SS, Chung H, Kim JS, et al. Poor Mobilization-Associated Factors in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Harvest. Cancers. 2024; 16(10):1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101821
Chicago/Turabian StyleAhn, Won Kee, Hyun-Jun Nam, Hae Won Lee, Seungmin Hahn, Jung Woo Han, Chuhl Joo Lyu, Sinyoung Kim, Soon Sung Kwon, Haerim Chung, Jin Seok Kim, and et al. 2024. "Poor Mobilization-Associated Factors in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Harvest" Cancers 16, no. 10: 1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101821
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
