Next Article in Journal
Indole-Based Compounds in the Development of Anti-Neurodegenerative Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Zinc N,N-bis(2-picolyl)amine Chelates Show Substitution-Dependent Cleavage of Phosphodiesters in Models as Well as of PNAzyme-RNA Bulges
Previous Article in Special Issue
2-Azidobenzaldehyde-Based [4+2] Annulation for the Synthesis of Quinoline Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Electronic, and Antibacterial Properties of 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted Phenothiazinyl N-Propyl Trimethylammonium Salts

by
Hilla Khelwati
1,
Lasse van Geelen
2,
Rainer Kalscheuer
2 and
Thomas J. J. Müller
1,*
1
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
2
Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(9), 2126; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092126
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 3 May 2024

Abstract

:
In this study, a library of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts is prepared. These title compounds and their precursors are reversible redox systems with tunable potentials. The Hammett correlation gives a very good correlation of the first oxidation potentials with σp parameters. Furthermore, the title compounds and their precursors are blue to green-blue emissive. Screening of the salts reveals for some derivatives a distinct inhibition of several pathogenic bacterial strains (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Aconetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) in the lower micromolar range.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Phenothiazine, i.e., 10H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]thiazine, is a synthetic non-naturally occurring tricyclic heterocycle that has received recognition in many fields of molecular science, starting from dye chemistry in the late 19th century, via histochemical staining (as dye methylene blue), to pharmacology and biomedicine in the 20th century [1]. In the past decades, the extraordinary electronic structure of this electron-rich system has paved new alleys to functional materials in optoelectronics [2,3], dye-sensitized solar cells [4], and mesoporous silica hybrid materials [5]. And again, in the 21st century, the phenothiazine scaffold is receiving considerable attention for its multifaceted biological activity [6]. Phenothiazine derivatives exhibit promising antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antifilarial, trypanocidal, anticonvulsant, analgesic, immunosuppressive, and multidrug resistance reversal properties [7]. Increasingly, for phenothiazines, known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or local anesthetics, antibacterial activity has been recognized [8]. In addition, among other privileged scaffolds, phenothiazines are considered to be photosensitizers in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy [9]. Derivatives bearing halogens or electron-withdrawing groups have been shown to have anticancer and antiprotozoal effects [10]. Diverse biological activities associated with phenothiazine hybrids make them particularly promising candidates for drug development [11].
For combatting multidrug resistance in treating infectious diseases and cancer, phenothiazines are also discussed as a cost-effective strategy against this resistance; however, simultaneously, their potential effects on bacterial resistance and dysbiosis have been considered [12]. In particular, in targeting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with its multidrug resistance mechanisms, including efflux pumps and biofilm formation, phenothiazines, like chlorpromazine, which has received classic status in chemical neuroscience [13], can be considered to be efflux pump inhibitors [14].
In Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the outermost membrane apparently forms a permeability barrier, causing their already intrinsic resistance to many active substances [15]. Molecules with a cationic or cationic–hydrophobic character can be considered for interaction with the phospholipid membrane of a bacterium.
Cationically substituted phenothiazines are (a) water-soluble and (b) amphiphilic due to the organic residue. In addition, the organic residue is (c) a chromophore (with absorption in near UV/Vis and emission in blue-green (fluorescence microscopy)) and (d) a redox system that is also capable of photo-induced electron transfer. Recently, we showed that phenothiazines with quaternary ammonium groups in their side chains are readily immobilized on both periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMO) and neat silica SBA-15 materials via ion exchange [16]. UV irradiation induced the formation of stable phenothiazine radical cations embedded in the hybrid materials, confirmed by cyclic voltammetry of the native materials and EPR spectroscopy of the oxidized specimen. Here, we generalize the modular approach to the synthesis of 3-trimethylammoniumpropyl sidechain-substituted 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted phenothiazine to provide electronically diverse substitution in positions 3 and 7. Furthermore, we present and discuss the electronic properties investigated with cyclic voltammetry, optical absorption, and emission spectroscopy, and we disclose a screening of the antibacterial activity against seven selected pathogenic strains.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

As in a previous work [16], the synthesis commences with the dibromination of phenothiazine (1) to give 3,7-dibromophenothiazine (2) in 88% yield (Scheme 1) [17]. The Michael addition of compound 2 in Triton B® furnishes 10-propionitrile phenothiazine 3 in 70% yield [16]. The indium-trichloride-mediated boranate reduction [18] gives 10-(3-amino propyl) 3,7-dibromophenothiazine (4) in 91% yield, that is, Boc-protected under standard conditions, to give the dibromo substrate 5 in 95% yield.
The Boc-protected 10-(3-amino propyl) 3,7-dibromo phenothiazine 5 sets the stage for twofold Suzuki coupling with (hetero)aryl boronic acids or pinacol boronates 6 to give six 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted phenothiazines 7 in good yield after isolation by flash chromatography (Scheme 2). The treatment of compounds 7 with an excess of trifluoroacetic acid leads to Boc deprotection; the ammonium salt is permethylated in the presence of an excess of methyl iodide (for the preparation of salt 8a) or methyl triflate (for the preparation of salts 8b–f), and potassium carbonate as a base gives rise to the isolation of six salts 8 in moderate to excellent yield. The structures of the salts (compound 8a as a carbonate with two cations and compounds 8b–f as triflates with one cation) is unambiguously assigned by the combination of 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, indicating mirror plane symmetry by the occurrence of a reduced set of signals, with IR spectroscopy identifying the counter anion by characteristic vibration bands (1454 cm−1 as a very dominant CO valence vibration for the carbonate ion in salt 8a; ~1240 and ~1030 cm−1 as very dominant SO and CF valence vibrations for triflate ions in the salts 8b–f), mass spectrometry unambiguously verifying the molecular peak of the cation, as well as HRMS identifying the molecular composition of the cations and/or combustion analysis for the molecular composition of the salts.

2.2. Electronic Properties of Compounds 7 and 8

As part of our ongoing interest in the structure–property relationships of 3-(hetero)aryl and 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted phenothiazines [19,20], we became intrigued in studying the effect of Boc-protected 3-aminopropyl (compounds 7) and 3-trimethylammoniumpropyl sidechains (compounds 8) at the 10-position of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted phenothiazines on the electronic properties in the electronic ground and excited states. Therefore, cyclic voltammograms and absorption and emission spectra were recorded to determine the redox potentials (cyclic voltammograms) and UV/Vis absorption and fluorescence bands and thereof the Stokes shifts (Table 1).
The cyclic voltammetry of triads 7a and 8a discloses the expected behavior of three conjugatively coupled electrophores [21,22] with three reversible one-electron oxidations at potentials of 0.620, 0.740, and 0.850 V (7a) and 0.610, 0.720, and 0.830 V (8a), respectively (Table 1). As can be seen by the minute differences in the oxidation potentials, the effect of the remote 3-NH-Boc or 3-trimethylammonium substituent on the sidechain is only minor. Indeed, it can be considered that the first oxidation giving a radical cation, that is delocalized over all three phenothiazines, renders this potential to lie cathodically shifted. For the consanguineous series 7b–f and 8b–f, the site of oxidation is clearly localized on the central phenothiazine unit, which certainly experiences the Coulombic interaction of the sidechain after oxidation. The first oxidation potentials E00/+1 are found in a range from 0.640 to 0.830 V (compounds 7b–f) and from 0.680 to 0.840 V (compounds 8b–f), respectively. The second oxidations to the phenothiazine-centered dications are only found at potentials E0+1/+2 between 1.040 and 1.400 V for the more electron-rich substituted compounds 7b–d and 8b–d. For both series, a distinct anodic shift of E00/+1 is discernable with altering the remote 3,7-substituents from electron-releasing to electron-withdrawing. For a closer inspection to estimate the transmission of the polar substituent effect of the remote substituent in the 3- and 7-position on the ease of oxidation, correlation analyses of the oxidation potentials E00/+1 with Hammett parameters [23] σp, σR, σR+, σp+, and σp− were considered.
In the consanguineous series of compounds 7b–f, indeed, the highest linear regression coefficients are obtained for parameters σp (R2 = 0.9903), σp+ (R2 = 0.9631), and σp− (R2 = 0.9491) (for details, see Supporting Information). The involvement of σp clearly indicates that the electronic substituent effects are transmitted via resonance and inductive pathways, as previously observed for other 3,7-disubstituted phenothiazines [19,24]. The same correlation can be established for the consanguineous series of the trimethylammonium salts 8b–f, where the linear regression coefficients for σp (R2 = 0.9855) and σp+ (R2 = 0.9839) are very similar and for σp− (R2 = 0.9056) are less, indicating the similar transmission mechanism of remote polar substituents by resonance and inductive pathways for the stabilization of the formed radical dication.
The absorption spectra disclose the longest wavelength bands between 330 and 373 nm (compounds 7a–f) and between 323 and 368 nm (compounds 8a–f), with absorption coefficients in a range between 6000 and 41,000 m−1cm−1 (Table 1, Figure 1).
While the red shifts of the triads 7a and 8a amount to intense shoulders at 367 nm (7a) or a maximum at 368 nm (8a) attributed to the extended π-conjugation, the most redshifted bands appear for the p-cyano phenyl derivatives at 373 nm (7f) and 359 nm (8f). All compounds 7 and 8 luminesce intensively with a blue to green color in a range from 455 to 520 nm, and the Stokes shifts are quite broad, ranging from 6300 to 9500 cm−1, which is quite typical for phenothiazine as a consequence of geometrical and electronic changes upon photonic excitation, namely the planarization of the phenothiazine core in the vibrationally relaxed excited state and considerable charge transfer from the central phenothiazine donor to the 3,7-substituents that act as acceptors in the excited state [25,26].
Correlation analyses with the photophysical data λmax,abs (absorption), λmax,em (emission), and Δ ν ˜ (Stokes shift) of the consanguineous series of compounds 7b–f and 8b–f, with Hammett parameters of σp, σR, σR+, σp+, and σp−, can be likewise probed for estimating the transmission of the polar substituent effect of the remote substituent in 3- and 7-position on excitation, radiative deexcitation, and structural changes in the vibrationally relaxed excited state [20]. While the data of the longest wavelength absorption bands λmax,abs only give mediocre (compounds 7b–f) or poor (compounds 8b–f) linear correlations with σp− and σp, respectively, the emission bands λmax,em correlate for both series with σp and σp- reasonably well (compounds 7b–f, σp−: R2 = 0.9564; compounds 8b–f, σp: R2 = 0.9129). This accounts for the transmission of the remote substituent effects in the planarized vibrationally relaxed excited state of phenothiazines [25,27]. Expectedly, the Stokes shifts indicating electronic or geometrical structural changes upon photonic excitation do not correlate in a meaningful sense due to the poor correlation of the absorption bands.

2.3. Biological Properties of Compounds 7 and 8

We have tested the activity of the selected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8 and salt 9 [16] in a screening assay against common human pathogens, namely Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, and four Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa, E. coli, Actinobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae), to assess the antibacterial activity, i.e., determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against the corresponding bacterial strains (Table 2).
The activity screening reveals that 3,7-diaryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8b–f can effectively inhibit the growth of M. tuberculosis (MIC 12.5–25 μm) and S. aureus (MIC 6.25–12.5 μm), where compound 8d is the most efficacious. In addition, this compound also inhibits the growth of E. coli (MIC 25 μm), A. baumannii (MIC 25 μm), and K. pneumoniae (MIC 12.5 μm). Apparently, P. aeruginosa is not inhibited by any of the substances under a threshold MIC of 100 μm. For A. baumannii, the aryl substituents obviously should be small, since bis(phenyl) derivative 8d (MIC 25 μm) and bis(p-chlorophenyl) derivative 8e (MIC 50 μm) at least show some inhibition. The steric demand predominantly applies for compound 8a, which, despite its lipophilicity by the two n-hexyl phenothiazinyl substituents, does not show any activity of the tested pathogen strains. However, since the smallest compound in this series, compound 9, also fails almost completely, a balanced decoration rendering lipophilicity and amphiphilicity as for 3,7-diaryl-substituted derivatives proves to give the most efficacious inhibition. This promises a good starting point for suitable cationically substituted phenothiazine derivatives.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Considerations

Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere using Schlenk, septum, and cannula techniques in heated single- or multi-neck flasks or Schlenk tubes. Nitrogen and argon were used as protective gases. Heated silicone baths were used at higher temperatures. At lower temperatures, cooling baths were used (acetone/dry ice, ice/water, or ice/salt mixtures). A high-vacuum pump from Büchi (Essen, Germany) was used for securation. Solvents were removed by distillation using vacuum pumps and rotary evaporators from Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG (Schwabach, Germany). The rotary evaporators were operated at a water bath temperature of 40 °C.
The chemicals used for this work, which were not synthesized in-house, were obtained commercially from the companies ABCR GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany), Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium), Alfa-Aesar GmbH & Co. KG (Ward Hill, MA, USA), Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany), Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany), Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (St. Louis, MO, USA), or VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). Boronic acids and boronates 6 were synthesized according to the procedures outlined in the literature. The solvents used were purchased in pure form and removed as far as possible from water and other impurities according to standardized regulations or taken from a solvent drying system MB-SPS-800 from M. Braun Inertgas-Systeme GmbH (Garching, Germany).
For column chromatography, silica gel 60 m from Macherey-Nagel (grain size 0.04–0.063) or from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA, mesh 70–230, grain size 0.04–0.063, or mesh 230–400) was used as the stationary phase, and Celite® 545 was used as the adsorbent, and this was obtained from Carl Roth GmbH. Pure sea sand from AppliChem (Chicago, IL, USA) was also used. Column chromatography was carried out using flash technology at an overpressure of two bars of compressed air. Various solvents and solvent mixtures of distilled n-hexane, distilled n-hexane/acetone, distilled dichloromethane, and distilled dichloromethane/methanol were used as eluents.
The polarity of the eluent and the qualitative monitoring of the reaction progress were determined and carried out using thin-layer chromatography. Here, the Rf value of the product was adjusted so that it was approximately in the range of 0.3. For this purpose, silica-yellow-coated aluminum foil (60, F254) from Merck KGaA with a fluorescent indicator was used. Detection was carried out using UV light with wavelengths of 254 nm and 365 nm.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded using the Avance III 300, DRX 500 and Avance III 600 spectrometer from Bruker (Karlsruhe, Germany). The solvents used were acetone-d6 and DMSO-d6, whereby all 1H and 13C spectra were locked to the signals of the non-deuterated solvents (acetone-d6: 1H NMR: δ 2.84, 13C NMR: δ 206. 3 and δ 29.8; DMSO-d6: 1H NMR: δ 2.50, 13C NMR: δ 39.51). The chemical shifts δ are given in ppm, and the coupling constants J are given in Hz. The individual signals were identified and assigned with the aid of the chemical shifts, the integrals, the multiplicity, and the coupling constants. When describing the multiplicity of the individual signals, the following common abbreviations were used: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), dd (doublet of doublet), dt (doublet of triplet), quint. (quintet), and m (multiplet). The carbon nuclei were assigned using 13C NMR and 135-Dept spectra, with primary carbon nuclei designated as CH3, secondary as CH2, tertiary as CH, and quaternary as Cquat.
The electron ionization mass spectra were recorded using the TSQ 7000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer from Finnigan MAT (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Ultraflex I spectrometer from Bruker DALTONICS was used to record the MALDI (TOF) spectra. High-resolution ESI measurements were carried out on a UHR-QTOF maXis 4G, also from Bruker Daltonics.
The infrared spectra were recorded on an IR-Affinity-1 using the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) technique from Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan). The solids obtained were plotted and measured as such. The position of the absorption bands in the spectrum was indicated in wavenumbers ν ˜ [cm−1]. The intensities of the IR absorption bands obtained are indicated as s (strong), m (medium), and w (weak).
The elemental analyses were carried out using the Perkin Elmer Series II Analyzer 2400 from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) or an Elementar vario MICRO CUBE at the Institute for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, and the melting points were determined using the Melting Point B-540 apparatus from Büchi.
The UV/Vis spectra were recorded on a UV/VIS/NIR Lambda 19 spectrometer from Perkin Elmer. All compounds were measured at room temperature using high-purity solvents (HPLC or UVASOL). The extinction coefficients were determined using Lambert–Beer’s law. For this purpose, five absorbance spectra of the respective compound were recorded at different concentrations. By plotting the absorbance against the concentration, the absorbance coefficient could be determined from the slope of the equalization line at the selected wavelength.
The emission spectra presented in this work were recorded on a calibrated Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). The fluorescence was always excited at the absorption maximum. All samples were measured at room temperature in dichloromethane (purity grade HPLC or UVASOL).
All experimentally recorded cyclic voltammograms within this work were measured in a small-volume glass cell (4 mL) with a three-electrode arrangement. The experiments were performed under argon atmosphere in dry and degassed dichloromethane at room temperature with feed rates of ν = 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mV·s−1. Tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.1 m in dichloromethane) was used as the electrolyte. A 2 mm platinum disk coated with glass was used as the working electrode. The counter electrode was a platinum wire, and the reference electrode consisted of a solid Ag/AgCl electrode filled with a sodium chloride solution (3.5 m). All potentials were referenced to the internal standard of decamethylferrocene/decamethylferrocenium ([DMFc]/[DMFc]+, E00/+1 = −0.095 V). The absolute potential of ([DMFc]/[DMFc]+ was determined against that of ferrocene ([Fc]/[Fc]+, E00/+1 = 0.450 V) [28]. The redox-active substance was weighed into the measuring cell together with the conducting salt and degassed for five minutes by introducing argon while stirring. The model 263A galvanostat/potentiostat from EG&G Princeton Applied Research (Champaign, IL, USA) was used. The device was controlled by the PowerSuite Revision 2.12.1 program from Princeton Applied Research PerkinElmer Instruments.

3.2. Antibacterial Activity Testing

The cultivation of M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv was performed in PETG square bottles (Nalgene; Rochester, New York, NY, USA) in Middlebrock 7H9 liquid growth medium (BD; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10% ADS (0.81% NaCl (w/v), 5% BSA (w/v), 2% dextrose (w/v)), 0.5% glycerol (v/v), and 0.05% tyloxapol (v/v). The MIC assay was performed in 96-well round-bottom polystyrene plates (Greiner; Kremsmünster, Austria) with a compound test range from 100 µM to 0.78 µM in a total volume of 100 µL. After static incubation for five days at 37 °C (5% CO2, 80% humidity), growth was assessed using the resazurin reduction assay. For this, 10 μL of resazurin solution (100 μg/mL, Sigma Aldrich) was added into each well and incubated overnight. After the fixation of cells for 30 min at room temp following the addition of 10% (v/v) formalin, growth was quantified by measuring fluorescence using a microplate reader (TECAN; Maennedorf, Switzerland) (excitation: 540 nm, emission: 590 nm). After calculating growth relative to the DMSO solvent control (=100% growth) and uninoculated wells (subtraction of background fluorescence = 0% growth), the MIC value was determined as the actually tested lowest compound concentration, which resulted in 10% residual growth or less. Rifampicin was used as a positive control in all the experiments with M. tuberculosis.
The growth of the nosocomial bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), E. coli (ATCC 25922), Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC BAA-747), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883) was performed at 37 °C in Mueller–Hinton medium (BD; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Moxifloxacin was used as the positive control. The antimicrobial activity against nosocomial bacteria was determined following the CLSI guidelines [29] in 96-well round-bottom polystyrene plates (Greiner; Kremsmünster, Austria) with a compound test ranging from 100 µm to 0.78 µm in a total volume of 100 µL. The MIC values were determined after overnight incubation as the actually tested lowest compound concentration that prevented visible growth by macroscopical evaluation.

3.3. Synthesis of tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (5) [16]

3.3.1. 3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazine (2)

Phenothiazine (1) (25.0 g, 125 mmol) was placed in a dry two-necked round-bottom flask with a magnetic stir bar under nitrogen, and degassed acetic acid (600 mL) was added. Bromine (13.5 mL, 263 mmol) in acetic acid (200 mL) was added slowly and dropwise from the dropping funnel to the reaction mixture. The deep-colored solution was then stirred at room temperature for 16 h. A saturated aqueous solution of sodium sulfite (31.5 g, 250 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture, which was then stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The initially violet suspension brightened to milky beige within this time. Then, the reaction mixture was poured on ice water (2 L). The resulting greenish precipitate was collected by suction and washed with a small amount of ice water. The precipitate was dried to weight constancy to give 3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazine (2) (50.7 g, 88%) as a greenish powder, Mp 186–188 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 7:3): 0.42.
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.58 (d, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.11 (d, 4J = 2.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.14 (dd, 4J = 2.3 Hz, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 8.84 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 112.7 (Cquat), 116.0 (Cquat), 118.2 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 140.9 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 359 (51, [C12H781Br2NS]+), 357 (100, [C12H779Br81BrNS]+), 355 (54, [C12H779Br2NS]+), 278 (78, [C12H781BrNS]+), 276 (73, [C12H779BrNS]+), 197 (81, [C12H7NS]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3377 (vw), 3321 (w), 3069 (vw), 2849 (vw), 1566 (vw), 1441 (m), 1420 (m), 1383 (m), 1368 (w), 1288 (m), 1236 (w), 1136 (w), 1080 (m), 1057 (w), 1020 (w), 934 (w), 881 (m), 864 (w), 847 (w), 808 (s), 750 (m), 731 (m), 700 (w), 673 (m), 648 (w).

3.3.2. 3-(3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propiononitrile (3)

3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazine (2) (21.0 g, 59.0 mmol) was placed in a dry Schlenk flask with a magnetic stir bar under nitrogen and suspended in acrylonitrile (120 mL). The mixture was cooled to 0 °C (ice–water bath), and 40 wt.% of Triton B® in methanol (2.15 mL) was added slowly and dropwise under external cooling and vigorous stirring. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography, and then the reaction mixture was poured into water (480 mL), and a beige solid precipitated. The precipitate was filtered off and dried under vacuum for 16 h. The crude product was adsorbed on Celite®, purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), suspended in a small volume of acetone, filtered, and dried under vacuum to weight constancy to give 3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propiononitrile (3) (16.9 g, 70%) as a colorless solid, Mp 146–148 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.26.
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.90 (t, 3J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.18 (t, 3J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.04 (d, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (dd, 3J = 8.7, 4J = 2.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (d, 4J = 2.3 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 15.7 (CH2), 42.5 (CH2), 114.6 (Cquat), 117.7 (CH), 118.4 (Cquat), 126.1 (Cquat), 129.2 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 142.9 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 412 (37, [M81Br2]+), 410 (81, [M81Br79Br]+), 408 (37, [M79Br]+), 372 (52, [C13H881Br2N32S]+), 370 (100, [C13H881Br79BrN32S]+), 368 (48, [C13H879Br2N32S]+), 358 (44, [(C12H681Br2N32S]+), 356 (89, [(C12H681Br79BrN32S]+), 354 (42, [(C12H679Br2N32S]+), 291 (59, [C13H881BrN32S]+), 289 (54, [C13H879BrN32S]+), 196 (65, [C12H6N32S]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1] = 3086 (vw), 2990 (vw), 2961 (vw), 2905 (vw), 2249 (vw), 1585 (vw), 1477 (w), 1452 (s), 1408 (w), 1391 (w), 1335 (m), 1317 (m), 1288 (w), 1248 (m), 1227 (w), 1194 (m), 1165 (w), 1155 (w), 1113 (w), 1096 (w), 1080 (w), 1070 (w), 1045 (w), 1028 (vw) 989 (vw), 901 (vw), 864 (m), 797 (s), 789 (m), 752 (m), 741 (w), 700 (vw), 650 (w), 606 (w).

3.3.3. 3-(3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propylamine (4)

Indium trichloride (3.32 g, 15.0 mmol) and sodium borohydride (1.70 g, 45.0 mmol) were suspended in THF (50.0 mL) in a dry Schlenk tube with a magnetic stir bar and stirred at room temp for 1 h. After a careful and portion-wise addition of 3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propylnitrile (3) (6.11 g, 15.0 mmol) to the grayish reaction mixture, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temp for 4 h. The reaction was stopped by the careful and dropwise addition of 3.00 m hydrochloric acid (50 mL), resulting in strong gas evolution. The reaction solution was then heated at 90 °C to reflux for 1 h. After cooling to room temp and the addition of methanol (25 mL) to the reaction mixture, heating to reflux at 90 °C was continued for 1 h. After cooling, the volatile organic components were removed under reduced pressure, and the precipitate was separated from the remaining aqueous phase by filtration. The crude product was adsorbed on Celite® and purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine 7:2:0.1). Then, the product was suspended in a small volume of methanol, filtered, and dried to weight constancy under vacuum to give 3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propylamine (4) (6.09 g, 91%) as a pale beige powder, Mp 139–141 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine 1:1:0.01): 0.42.
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.94 (mc, 2 H). 2.92–2.78 (m, 2 H), 3.95 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.02 (d, 3J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.47–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.93 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 24.3 (CH2), 36.5 (CH2), 43.9 (CH2), 114.4 (Cquat), 117.9 (CH), 125.9 (Cquat), 129.2 (CH), 130.4 (CH), 143.6 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 416 (36, [M81Br2]+), 414 (70, [M81Br79Br]+), 412 (34, [M79Br2]+), 398 (20, [C15H1281Br2N32S]+), 396 (39, [C15H1281Br79Br N32S]+), 394 (19, [C15H1279Br2N32S]+), 372 (12, [C13H881Br2N32S]+), 370 (24, [C13H881Br79BrN32S]+), 368 (12, [C13H879Br2N32S]+), 358 (48, [C12H681Br2N32S]+), 356 (85, [C12H681Br79BrN32S]+), 354 (42, [C12H679Br2N32S]+), 291 (21, [C13H881BrN32S]+), 289 (20, [C13H879BrN32S]+), 277 (29, [C12H681BrN32S]+), 196 (73, [C12H6N32S]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3092 (vw), 3057 (vw), 2934 (vw), 1585 (w), 1479 (m), 1456 (s), 1387 (w), 1327 (w), 1294 (w), 1252 (m), 1229 (m), 1150 (w), 1109 (w), 1082 (w), 1057 (w), 868 (w), 806 (m), 750 (m), 650 (w).

3.3.4. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (5)

In a dry Schlenk tube with a magnetic stir bar, 3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propylamine (4) (3.97 g, 8.80 mmol), di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.92 g, 8. 80 mmol), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (108 mg, 0.88 mmol) were placed under nitrogen, and dichloromethane (44 mL) and triethylamine (2.45 mL, 17.7 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temp for 16 h. The reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Then, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the crude product was adsorbed on Celite® and purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexanes/acetone 9:1 to 7:3) to give tert-butyl (3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (5) (4.30 g, 95%) as a beige-colored, glassy solid, Mp 70–72 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine 7:3:0.1): 0.39.
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.35 (s, 9 H), 1.76 (m, 2 H), 3.01 (m, 2 H), 3.83 (t, 3J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.86 (t, 3J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.96 (d, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 26.4 (CH2), 28.2 (CH3), 37.6 (CH2), 44.5 (CH2), 77.5 (Cquat), 114.1 (Cquat), 117.6 (CH), 125.6 (Cquat), 129.1 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 143.8 (Cquat), 155.6 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 516 (14, [M81Br2]+), 514 (32, [M81Br79Br]+), 512 (14, [M79Br2]+), 460 (13, [C16H1481Br2N2O232S]+), 458 (29, [C16H1481Br79Br N2O232S]+), 456 (13, [C16H1479Br2N2O232S]+), 357 (62, [C12H781Br79Br N32S]+), 277 (30, [C12H779BrN32S]+), 196 (39, [C12H6N32S]+), 102 (100, [C5H9O2]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3395 (vw), 3379 (vw), 2976 (w), 2926 (w), 1694 (m), 1686 (m), 1516 (w), 1506 (m), 1481 (w), 1452 (vs), 1389 (m), 1364 (m), 1327 (w), 1267 (m), 1248 (s), 1202 (w), 1163 (s), 1109 (w), 1082 (w), 1040 (vw), 1003 (w), 959 (vw), 932 (vw), 868 (m), 802 (s), 779 (w), 750 (m), 652 (w). Anal. calcd. for C20H22Br2N2O2S [514.3]: C 46.71, H 4.31, N 5.45, S 6.23; Found: C 46.98, H 4.17, N 5.32, S 6.23.

3.4. General Procedure (GP1) for the Suzuki Synthesis of Boc-Protected 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-Phenothiazines 7

Phenothiazine dibromide 5 (1.00 equiv), boronic acid or boronic acid ester 6 (2.20–2.40 equivs), cesium fluoride (6.40 equivs), and tetrakis(triphenylphosphane)palladium(0) (6.00 mol%) were placed in a dry Schlenk tube with a magnetic stir bar under nitrogen atmosphere, and 1,4-dioxane was added (for experimental details, see Table 3). The reaction mixture was heated to reflux at 101 °C for 16 h to give a yellow solution or suspension. After cooling to room temp, dichloromethane (20 to 90 mL) was added, and the solution was washed with distilled water (2 × 20 to 100 mL) and with saturated brine (1 × 20 to 100 mL). The aqueous phases were again extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phases were dried (anhydrous magnesium sulfate), and the crude product was adsorbed on Celite® and purified by column chromatography on silica gel to give 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl)-10H-phenothiazines 7.

3.4.1. tert-Butyl (3-(10,10″-Dihexyl-10H,10′H,10″H-[3,3′:7′,3″-terphenothiazin]-10′-yl)propyl)carbamate (7a)

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), compound 7a (1.56 g, 85%) was obtained as yellow crystals, Mp 98–104 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.37.
1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 0.85 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H), 1.23–1.35 (m, 8 H), 1.38 (s, 9 H), 1.47 (mc, 4 H), 1.81 (mc, 4 H), 2.03 (mc, 2 H), 3.26 (mc, 2 H), 3.95 (t, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H), 4.05 (t, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.10 (t, 3J = 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.90–6.98 (m, 2 H), 7.00–7.11 (m, 6 H), 7.13–7.23 (m, 4 H), 7.39 (mc, 4 H), 7.77 (mc, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 14.3 (CH3), 23.3 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 27.6 (CH2), 28.2 (CH2), 28.6 (CH3), 32.2 (CH2), 39.0 (CH2), 45.7 (CH2), 47.8 (CH2), 78.5 (Cquat), 116.6 (CH), 116.8 (CH), 116.8 (CH), 123.3 (CH), 125.1 (Cquat), 125.5 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 125.7 (Cquat), 126.0 (Cquat), 126.1 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 128.3 (CH), 134.9 (Cquat), 135.1 (Cquat), 144.9 (Cquat), 145.3 (Cquat), 146.0 (Cquat), 156.8 (Cquat). MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd. For [C56H62N4O2S3]+: 918.403; Found: 918.431. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2957 (m), 2926 (m), 2901 (w), 1709 (m), 1601 (w), 1576 (w), 1499 (m), 1456 (vs), 1414 (w), 1377 (m), 1364 (m), 1331 (m), 1240 (s), 1163 (m), 1140 (m), 1105 (w), 1065 (w), 1042 (w), 1011 (vw), 874 (m), 854 (vw), 806 (s), 779 (w), 745 (s), 706 (vw), 623 (w), 606 (m). Anal. Calcd. For C56H62N4O2S3 [919.3]: C 73.16, H 6.80, N 6.09, S 10.46; Found: C 73.30, H 6.76, N 5.89, S 10.25.

3.4.2. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (7b)

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), compound 7b (630 mg, 79%) was obtained as a colorless solid, Mp 151–156 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.31.
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.36 (s, 9 H), 1.86 (mc, 2 H), 3.08 (mc, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 6 H), 3.91 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.92 (t, 3J = 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.98 (d, 3J = 8.9 Hz, 4 H), 7.06 (d, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (d, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.43 (dd, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (d, 3J = 8.9 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 26.8 (CH2), 28.3 (CH3), 44.5 (CH2), 55.2 (CH3), 77.7 (Cquat), 114.4 (CH), 115.9 (CH), 123.8 (Cquat), 124.6 (CH), 125.3 (CH), 127.2 (CH), 131.4 (Cquat), 134.3 (Cquat), 143.2 (Cquat), 155.8 (Cquat), 158.7 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 568 (40, [M]+), 512 (42, [C30H27N2O4S]+), 424 (9, [C27H22NO2S]+), 410 (100, [C26H20NO2S]+), 414 (15, [C27H16N3S]+), 400 (100, [C26H14N3S]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2970 (w), 2951 (w), 2930 (w), 2868 (vw), 2833 (w), 1697 (s), 1682 (m), 1607 (m), 1580 (w), 1518 (m), 1493 (m), 1460 (s), 1439 (m), 1430 (m), 1391 (m), 1364 (m), 1331 (m), 1281 (m), 1242 (vs), 1209 (m), 1179 (s), 1113 (m), 1086 (w), 1047 (m), 1024 (m), 1009 (m), 955 (w), 926 (w), 912 (w), 883 (w), 808 (s), 775 (m), 768 (m), 741 (w), 729 (w). 714 (w), 687 (w), 671 (m). Anal. calcd. for C34H30N4O2S [568.7]: C: 71.80, H: 6.38, N: 4.93, S: 5.64, Found: C: 71.69, H: 6.49, N: 4.68, S: 5.48.

3.4.3. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Di(thien-2-yl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (7c) [16]

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), compound 7c (359 mg, 69%) was obtained as a yellow powder, Mp 138–141 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 7:3): 0.34.
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.36 (s, 9 H), 1.84 (mc, 2 H), 3.07 (mc, 2 H), 3.91 (t, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.92, (t, 3J = 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.04 (d, 3J = 9.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.04 (dd, 3J = 9.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 6 H), 7.48 (dd, 3J = 5.1 Hz, 4J = 1.1 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 26.6 (CH2), 28.3 (CH3), 37.7 (CH2), 44.5 (CH2), 77.5 (Cquat), 116.1 (CH), 123.1 (CH), 123.6 (Cquat), 123.7 (CH), 124.9 (CH), 125.0 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 128.5 (Cquat), 142.2 (Cquat), 143.4 (Cquat), 155.6 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 520 (32, [C28H28N2O2S3]+), 464 (24, [C24H19N2O2S3]+), 446 (6, [C24H19N2OS3]+), 420 (13, [C23H19N2S3]+), 376 (8, [C21H14NS3]+), 362 (100, [C20H12NS3]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2974 (w), 2926 (w), 2864 (w), 1701 (m), 1680 (m), 1472 (vs), 1429 (m), 1400 (m), 1391 (m), 1364 (m), 1348 (w), 1333 (w), 1292 (w), 1261 (s), 1238 (s), 1207 (m), 1163 (s), 1109 (m), 1080 (w), 1042 (w), 1020 (w), 1007 (vw), 988 (w), 951 (vw), 951 (vw), 874 (m), 851 (m), 810 (s), 793 (m), 783 (w), 750 (m), 691 (vs), 650 (vw). Anal. Calcd. For C28H28N2O2S3 [519.7]: C 64.58, H 5.42, N 5.38, S 18.47; Found: C 64.83, H 5.69, N 5.12, S 18.17.

3.4.4. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Diphenyl-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (7d)

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), compound 7d (560 mg, 74%) was obtained as yellow crystals, Mp 92–98 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.39.
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.37 (s, 9 H), 1.88 (mc, 2 H), 3.09 (mc, 2 H), 3.95 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.94 (t, 3J = 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.11 (d, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.29–7.36 (m, 2 H). 7.39–7.48 (m, 6 H), 7.50 (dd, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.60–7.66 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 26.7 (CH2), 28.3 (CH3), 37.8 (CH2), 44.5 (CH2), 77.5 (Cquat), 116.0 (CH), 123.7 (Cquat), 125.0 (CH), 125.8 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 134.5 (Cquat), 138.9 (Cquat), 143.7 (Cquat), 155.7 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 508 (36, [M]+), 452 (32, [C28H23N2O2S]), 408 (4, [C27H23N2S]), 364 (12, [C25H18NS]), 350 (100, [C24H16NS]). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2968 (w), 2901 (w), 2887 (w), 2870 (w), 1738 (w), 1678 (s), 1599 (w), 1585 (w), 1526 (m), 1462 (s), 1393 (m), 1364 (m), 1329 (w), 1275 (s), 1248 (s), 1202 (w), 1165 (s), 1157 (s), 1111 (m), 1078 (m), 1055 (m), 1042 (w), 1023 (m), 1003 (m), 986 (w), 939 (vw), 876 (m), 868 (m), 853 (w), 820 (m), 812 (m), 762 (vs), 737 (m), 700 (s), 689 (m), 613 (m). Anal. calcd. for C32H32N2O2S [508.7]: C 75.56, H 6.34, N 5.51, S 5.92; Found: C 75.20, H 6.40, N 5.12, S 5.92.

3.4.5. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (7e)

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 8:2), compound 7e (660 mg, 76%) was obtained as yellow crystals, Mp 95–102 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.38.
1H NMR (600 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 1.38 (s, 9 H), 3.27 (mc, 2 H), 4.07 (t, 3J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.12 (t, 3J = 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (mc, 2 H), 7.42–7.47 (m, 6 H), 7.49 (d, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.64 (d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 28.1 (CH2), 28.6 (CH3), 39.0 (CH2), 45.8 (CH2), 78.6 (Cquat), 116.9 (CH), 125.7 (Cquat), 126.1 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 128.7 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 133.4 (Cquat), 134.9 (Cquat), 139.3 (Cquat), 145.4 (Cquat), 156.8 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 576 (40, [M]+), 520 (46, [C28H21Cl2N2O2S]), 504 (6, [C28H21Cl2N2OS]), 476 (3, [C27H21Cl2N2S]), 432 (14, [C25H16Cl2NS]), 419 (100, [C24H14Cl2NS]). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3898 (vw), 3834 (vw), 3688 (vw), 3381 (vw), 3354 (vw), 3032 (vw), 2934 (vw), 2845 (vw), 2818 (vw), 2357 (vw), 1697 (m), 1684 (m), 1607 (w), 1585 (w), 1506 (m), 1460 (vs), 1418 (w), 1387 (m), 1364 (m), 1339 (w), 1271 (m), 1248 (s), 1200 (m), 1163 (s), 1092 (m), 1011 (m), 1003 (m), 959 (w), 910 (w), 885 (w), 876 (w), 808 (vs), 779 (m), 764 (m), 723 (w), 635 (w). Anal. Calcd. For C32H30Cl2N2O2S [577.6]: C 66.55, H 5.24, N 4.85, S 5.55; Found: C 66.83, H 5.51, N 4.56, S 5.54.

3.4.6. tert-Butyl (3-(3,7-Bis(4-cyanophenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (7f)

According to the GP1 and after flash chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/acetone 7:3), compound 7f (530 mg, 67%) was obtained as a yellow powder, Mp 183–185 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 8:2): 0.22. 1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 1.38 (s, 9 H), 2.07 (m, 2 H), 3.25–3.31 (m, 2 H), 4.11 (t, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.13 (t, 3J = 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.19 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (d, 4J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (dd, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 4J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.82 (d, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 4 H), 7.86 (d, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 28.1 (CH2), 28.6 (CH3), 38.9 (CH2), 45.9 (CH2), 78.6 (Cquat), 111.3 (Cquat), 117.1 (CH), 119.4 (Cquat), 125.7 (Cquat), 126.5 (CH), 127.4 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 133.5 (CH), 134.3 (Cquat), 144.8 (Cquat), 146.0 (Cquat), 156.8 (Cquat). MS (EI) m/z (%): 558 (1, [M]+), 484 (50, [C30H22N4OS]+), 414 (15, [C27H16N3S]+), 400 (100, [C26H14N3S]+). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3393 (vw), 3364 (w), 2974 (w), 2932 (w), 2901 (vw), 2870 (vw), 2220 (s), 1676 (s), 1605 (m), 1585 (m), 1526 (m), 1518 (m), 1477 (vs), 1445 (w), 1418 (m), 1393 (s), 1364 (s), 1271 (s), 1244 (s), 1163 (s), 1125 (m), 1115 (m), 1038 (w), 1001 (m), 833 (s), 793 (vs), 648 (m). Anal. calcd. for C34H30N4O2S [558.7]: C: 73.09, H: 5.41, N: 10.03, S: 5.74, Found: C: 72.86, H: 5.50, N: 9.78, S: 5.71.

3.5. General Procedure (GP2) for the Synthesis of 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-Trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine Salts 8

In a Schlenk flask with a magnetic stir bar, Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-phenothiazine 7 (1.00 equiv) was dissolved in dichloromethane (10.0 mL/mmol) under nitrogen atmosphere, and trifluoroacetic acid (8.00 equivs) was added, whereby the color immediately changed from yellow to green-brown (for experimental details, see Table 4). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temp for 16 h, after which the volatile components were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of methanol and dichloromethane (10.0 mL/mmol), and potassium carbonate (20.0 equivs) was slowly added. Methyl iodide or methyl triflate (10.0 equivs) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The reaction solution was stirred at room temp for 16 h. The crude product was adsorbed on neutral alumina and purified by column chromatography on neutral alumina to give the trimethylammonium salts 8.

3.5.1. Bis{3-(10,10″-dihexyl-10H,10′H,10″H-[3,3′:7′,3″-terphenothiazin]-10′-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammonium} Carbonate (8a)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol 100:0 to 100:1), compound 8a (823 mg, 93%) was obtained as yellow crystals, Mp softening at 127 °C, melting between 148 and 152 °C. Rf (dichloromethane/methanol 100:1): 0.17.
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.82 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 6 H), 1.21–1.29 (m, 8 H), 1.39 (mc, 4 H), 1.69 (mc, 4 H), 2.15 (mc, 2 H), 3.04 (s, 9 H), 3.44 (mc, 2 H), 3.88 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 4 H), 3.99 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.92–6.97 (m, 2 H), 7.00–7.06 (m, 4 H), 7.13 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (dd, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 4J = 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.18–7.22 (m, 4 H), 7.42 (d, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.51 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 14.3 (CH3), 21.6 (CH2), 23.3 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 27.5 (CH2), 32.2 (CH2), 44.6 (CH2), 47.8 (CH2), 53.8 (CH3), 64.8 (CH2), 116.6 (CH), 116.8 (CH), 117.3 (CH), 123.3 (CH), 125.1 (Cquat), 125.5 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 125.8 (Cquat), 126.0 (Cquat), 126.2 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 128.4 (CH), 134.7 (Cquat), 135.3 (Cquat), 144.3 (Cquat), 145.3 (Cquat), 146.0 (Cquat). MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd. for [C54H61N4S3]+: 861.405; Found: 861.408. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2951 (w), 2924 (w), 2899 (w), 2866 (w), 2853 (w), 1601 (w), 1574 (w), 1454 (vs) 1416 (m), 1373 (m), 1331 (m), 1275 (w), 1238 (s), 1196 (m), 1134 (w), 1105 (m), 1078 (w), 1065 (w), 1040 (w), 1028 (w), 964 (w), 908 (w), 872 (w), 808 (m), 745 (s), 704 (w), 683 (w), 650 (w), 631 (w). Anal. calcd. for (C54H61N4S3)2CO3 [1784.6]: C 73.36, H 6.89, N 6.28, S 10.78; Found: C 73.23, H 6.83, N 5.91, S 10.41.

3.5.2. 3-(3,7-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammoniumtriflate (8b)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol 100:1 to 100:2), compound 8b (260 mg, 67%) was obtained as a pale beige powder, Mp 200–205 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 4:6): 0.11.
1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 2.50 (mc, 2 H), 3.79 (mc, 2 H), 3.34 (s, 9 H), 3.83 (s, 6 H), 4.21 (t, 3J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.00 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.17 (d, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.44–7.51 (m, 4 H), 7.56 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 21.9 (CH2), 44.8 (CH2), 53.9 (CH3), 53.9 (CH3), 54.0 (CH3), 55.7 (CH3), 65.5 (CH2), 115.3 (CH), 115.5 (Cquat), 117.2 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 126.6 (CH), 128.3 (CH), 131.6 (Cquat), 132.9 (Cquat), 136.7 (Cquat), 144.4 (Cquat), 160.4 (Cquat). MS (ESI) m/z calcd. for [C32H35N2O2S]+: 511.2; Found: 511.5. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2930 (vw), 1609 (m), 1518 (w), 1491 (m), 1464 (s), 1443 (m), 1423 (w), 1393 (w), 1341 (w), 1238 (vs), 1225 (s), 1198 (m), 1177 (s), 1155 (s), 1111 (m), 1082 (m), 1045 (m), 1028 (vs), 964 (w), 937 (vw), 910 (m), 883 (w), 808 (s), 773 (w), 756 (m), 637 (vs). Anal. calcd. for C33H35F3N2O5S2 [660.8]: C 59.99, H 5.34, N 4.24, S 9.70; Found: C 60.24, H 5.39, N 4.05, S 9.47.

3.5.3. 3-(3,7-Di(thiophen-2-yl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammoniumtriflate (8c)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol 100:1 to 100:2), compound 8c (140 mg, 59%) was obtained as a yellow powder, Mp 128–130 °C. Rf (methanol): 0.10.
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.50 (mc, 2 H), 3.80 (mc, 2 H), 4.21 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.04 (dd, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 4J = 1.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.11 (mc, 2 H), 7.16 (d, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.43 (dd, 3J = 5.1 Hz, 4J = 0.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 22.0 (CH2), 45.0 (CH2), 53.7 (CH3), 65.8 (CH2), 117.6 (CH), 123.9 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 127.5 (Cquat), 129.2 (CH), 131.5 (Cquat), 144.1 (Cquat), 145.1 (Cquat). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3034 (vw), 2963 (w), 1603 (vw), 1472 (s), 1427 (m), 1402 (m), 1346 (w), 1339 (w), 1258 (vs), 1223 (m), 1200 (w), 1153 (m), 1084 (s), 1045 (s), 1028 (vs), 1015 (s), 966 (w), 943 (vw), 910 (w), 872 (m), 851 (m), 799 (vs), 752 (m), 737 (w), 692 (s), 662 (vw), 637 (s), 610 (w). ESI-HRMS m/z calcd. for [C26H27N2S3]+: 463.1331; Found: 463.1336.

3.5.4. 3-(3,7-Diphenyl-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammoniumtriflate (8d)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol 100:1 to 100:2), compound 8d (240 mg, 81%) was obtained as yellow crystals, Mp softening at 110 °C, melting between 119 and 129 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 4:6): 0.13.
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.18 (mc, 2 H), 3.05 (s, 9 H), 3.46 (mc, 2 H), 4.02 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.19 (d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (mc, 2 H), 7.44 (mc, 4 H), 7.52 (d, 4J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (dd, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 4J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.64 (d, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 20.3 (CH2), 43.7 (CH2), 52.4 (CH3), 63.2 (CH2), 116.2 (CH), 124.1 (Cquat), 125.2 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 134.9 (Cquat), 138.8 (Cquat), 143.4 (Cquat). MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd. for [C31H31F3N2O3S2]+: 451.220; Found: 451.325. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 1599 (w), 1464 (s), 1393 (w), 1329 (w), 1252 (s), 1223 (m), 1196 (w), 1152 (m), 1109 (w), 1074 (w), 1028 (s), 966 (w), 935 (w), 914 (w), 883 (w), 826 (w), 760 (s), 737 (w), 696 (s), 637 (vs), 629 (m), 608 (m). Anal. calcd. for C31H31F3N2O3S2 [600.7]: C 61.98, H 5.20, N 4.66, S 10.67; Found: C 62.23, H 5.30, N 4.59, S 10.38.

3.5.5. 3-(3,7-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammoniumtriflate (8e)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol 100:1 to 100:2), compound 8e (210 mg, 71%) was obtained as a greenish powder, Mp softening at 151 °C, melting between 181 and 192 °C. Rf (n-hexane/acetone 4:6): 0.10.
1H NMR (600 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 2.49 (mc, 2 H), 3.34 (s, 9 H), 3.82 (mc, 2 H), 4.22 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz), 7.24 (d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 4 H), 7.50 (d, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (dd, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.65 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 21.6 (CH2), 44.7 (CH2), 53.7 (CH3), 53.7 (CH3), 53.8 (CH3), 65.0 (CH2), 117.3 (CH), 126.1 (Cquat), 126.2 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 133.5 (Cquat), 135.3 (Cquat), 139.1 (Cquat), 145.0 (Cquat). MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd. for [C30H2935Cl2N2S]+: 519.142; Found: 519.148. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3028 (vw), 2857 (vw), 1460 (s), 1414 (w), 1383 (w), 1341 (w), 1317 (vw), 1254 (s), 1225 (m), 1198 (w), 1157 (s), 1105 (w), 1092 (s), 1055 (w), 1028 (s), 1011 (m), 962 (w), 939 (vw), 910 (w), 891 (w), 810 (m), 791 (m), 768 (w), 756 (w), 745 (w), 723 (w), 691 (w), 637 (vs), 610 (w). Anal. calcd. for C31H29Cl2F3N2O3S2 [669.6]: C 55.61, H 4.37, N 4.18, S 9.58; Found: C 55.53, H 4.55, N 3.98, S 9.28.

3.5.6. 3-(3,7-Bis(4-cyanophenyl)-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-ammoniumtriflate (8f)

According to the GP2 and after flash chromatography on neutral alumina (dichloromethane/methanol (100:1 to 100:2)), compound 8f (150 mg, 53%) was obtained as a yellow powder, Mp softening at 145 °C, melting between 168 and 172 °C. Rf (acetone): 0.08.
1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 2.52 (mc, 2 H), 3.35 (s, 9 H), 3.82 (mc, 2 H), 4.26 (t, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.29 (d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.61 (d, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.66 (dd, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 4J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.85 (mc, 8 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 21.9 (CH2), 44.9 (CH2), 53.9 (CH3), 54.0 (CH3), 54.0 (CH3), 65.3 (CH2), 111.6 (Cquat), 117.5 (CH), 119.4 (Cquat), 126.4 (Cquat), 126.7 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 133.6 (CH), 133.8 (Cquat), 134.9 (Cquat), 144.8 (Cquat), 145.8 (Cquat). MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd. for [C32H29N4S]+: 501.211; Found: 501.222. IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 2930 (w), 2855 (m), 2224 (w), 1730 (w), 1605 (m), 1585 (w), 1468 (s), 1420 (m), 1364 (m), 1344 (w), 1248 (s), 1225 (m), 1198 (m), 1155 (s), 1109 (s), 1055 (m), 1030 (s), 962 (m), 914 (m), 881 (m), 843 (m), 810 (s), 743 (m), 689 (m), 637 (vs). Anal. calcd. for C33H29F3N4O3S2 [650.7]: C 60.91, H 4.49, N 8.61, S 9.85; Found: C 60.25, H 4.84, N 8.17, S 8.56.

3.6. N,N,N-Trimethyl-3-(10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propan-1-ammoniumtriflate (9) [16]

Compound 9 (332 mg, 90%) was synthesized according to [16] and obtained after purification as a colorless powder, Mp 168–170 °C. Rf (methanol): 0.31.
1H NMR (300 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 2.25 (mc, 2 H). 3.01 (s, 9 H), 3.45 (mc, 2 H), 4.11 (t, 3J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (mc, 2 H), 7.06 (dd, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 4J = 0.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.19 (dd, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 4J = 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (mc, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 21.8 (CH2), 44.7 (CH2), 53.5 (CH3), 65.7 (CH2), 117.3 (CH), 124.3 (CH), 127.4 (Cquat), 128.6 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 146.2 (Cquat). IR ν ˜ [cm−1]: 3065 (vw), 3042 (vw), 2965 (vw), 2868 (vw), 1593 (w), 1570 (w), 1485 (m), 1479 (m), 1460 (s), 1445 (m), 1422 (w), 1400 (w), 1339 (w), 1254 (vs), 1221 (s), 1200 (w), 1157 (s), 1140 (s), 1128 (m), 1109 (w), 1028 (s), 961 (w), 939 (w), 918 (w), 908 (w), 764 (s), 754 (w), 729 (m), 637 (s). MS (EI) m/z (%): 448 (1, [M]+), 299 (10, [C18H23N2S]+) 284 (41, [C17H20N2S]+), 239 (100, [C15H14NS]+), 212 (18, [C13H10NS]+), 199 (50, [C12H8NS]+). Anal. calcd. for C19H23F3N2O3S2 [448.5]: C 50.88, H 5.17, N 6.25, S 14.30; Found: C 50.83, H 5.36, N 6.09, S 14.05.

4. Conclusions

Starting from 3,7-dibromo phenothiazine, a library of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts can be prepared in five steps. As is typical for phenothiazines, all derivatives are redox systems with fully reversible first oxidations. The Hammett correlation reveals that the remote polar substituents in the consanguineous series of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted phenothiazine salts and their precursors correlate very well with the σp parameters. All salts and precursors can be excited in UV with a substituent tunable wavelength, and the compounds display blue to green-blue emission. The screening of the selected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts discloses for some derivatives a distinct inhibition of the pathogenic bacterial strains M. tuberculosis, S. aureus, E. coli, A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae; however, the distinct inhibition of P. aeruginosa is not disclosed. Based on the ease of the synthetic approach, further 3,7-diaryl- and 3-aryl-substituted phenothiazines with an N-propyl trimethylammonium sidechain can be tested; eventually, irradiation with UV light can also occur to trigger photoinduced electron transfer. Studies focused on scrutinizing the photophysical and biological properties of these N-propyl trimethylammonium phenothiazine derivatives are currently underway.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29092126/s1, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 7 and 8 (Figures S1–S20), correlation of E00/+1 of compounds 7 and 8 against Hammett parameters (Tables S1–S4; Figures S21–S30).

Author Contributions

The work consists of parts of the Ph.D. thesis of H.K., which was supervised by T.J.J.M. The conceptualization was outlined by T.J.J.M. Synthetic studies, analytical assignments, and electroanalytical and photophysical investigations with the compounds 7 and 8 were performed by H.K., who compiled and interpreted the obtained data. The antibacterial activity testing of compounds 8a, 8b, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 9 was performed by L.v.G. and jointly interpreted by L.v.G. and R.K. The writing of the original draft was completed by T.J.J.M., and the review and editing was completed by H.K., L.v.G., and R.K. Project administration and funding acquisition was completed by T.J.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU 1088/9-1 and MU 1088/13-1) and Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data in this work are included in the manuscript and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Burak Kürsat-Menekse for weighing the compounds 8a, 8b, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 9 for the preparation of their stock solutions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ohlow, M.J.; Moosmann, B. Foundation review: Phenothiazine: The seven lives of pharmacology’s first lead structure. Drug Discov. Today 2011, 16, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Revoju, S.; Matuhina, A.; Canil, L.; Salonen, H.; Hiltunen, A.; Abate, A.; Vivo, P. Structure-induced optoelectronic properties of phenothiazine-based materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 15486–15506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, F.; Misra, R. Recent advances in the development of phenothiazine and its fluorescent derivatives for optoelectronic applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 2786–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, Z.-S.; Meier, H.; Cao, D. Phenothiazine-based dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 2404–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Z.; Franz, A.W.; Hartmann, M.; Seifert, A.; Müller, T.J.J.; Thiel, W.R. Novel Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Materials by Covalent Anchoring of Phenothiazines on MCM-41. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 4986–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jaszczyszyn, A.; Gąsiorowski, K.; Świątek, P.; Malinka, W.; Cieślik-Boczula, K.; Petrus, J.; Czarnik-Matusewicz, B. Chemical structure of phenothiazines and their biological activity. Pharmacol. Rep. 2012, 64, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pluta, K.; Morak-Młodawska, B.; Jeleń, M. Recent progress in biological activities of synthesized phenothiazines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 3179–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lagadinou, M.; Onisor, M.O.; Rigas, A.; Musetescu, D.-V.; Gkentzi, D.; Assimakopoulos, S.F.; Panos, G.; Marangos, M. Antimicrobial Properties on Non-Antibiotic Drugs in the Era of Increased Bacterial Resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhou, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhen, X. Development of organic photosensitizers for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 5108–5128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. González-González, A.; Vazquez-Jimenez, L.K.; Paz-González, A.D.; Bolognesi, M.L.; Rivera, G. Recent Advances in the Medicinal Chemistry of Phenothiazines, New Anticancer and Antiprotozoal Agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 7910–7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Posso, M.C.; Domingues, F.C.; Ferreira, S.; Silvestre, S. Development of Phenothiazine Hybrids with Potential Medicinal Interest: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rácz, B.; Spengler, G. Repurposing Antidepressants and Phenothiazine Antipsychotics as Efflux Pump Inhibitors in Cancer and Infectious Diseases. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boyd-Kimball, D.; Gonczy, K.; Lewis, B.; Mason, T.; Siliko, N.; Wolfe, J. Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Chlorpromazine. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaur, B.; Gupta, J.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, S. Focused review on dual inhibition of quorum sensing and efflux pumps: A potential way to combat multi drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Blair, J.M.A.; Webber, M.A.; Baylay, A.J.; Ogbolu, D.O.; Piddock, L.J.V. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schäfgen, B.; Khelwati, H.; Bechtel, D.F.; DeCuyper, A.; Schüssler, A.; Neuba, A.; Pierik, A.J.; Ernst, S.; Müller, T.J.J.; Thiel, W.R. Phenothiazine electrophores immobilized on periodic mesoporous organosilicas by ion exchange. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 16396–16410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rednic, M.I.; Szima, S.; Bogdan, E.; Hădade, N.D.; Terec, A.; Grosu, I. Podands with 3,7,10-trisubstituted phenothiazine units: Synthesis and structural analysis. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2015, 60, 637–642. [Google Scholar]
  18. Saavedra, J.Z.; Resendez, A.; Rovira, A.; Eagon, S.; Haddenham, D.; Singaram, B. Reaction of InCl3 with Various Reducing Agents: InCl3–NaBH4-Mediated Reduction of Aromatic and Aliphatic Nitriles to Primary Amines. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sailer, M.; Nonnenmacher, M.; Oeser, T.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis and Electronic Properties of 3-Acceptor-Substituted and 3,7-Bisacceptor-Substituted Phenothiazines. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2006, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mayer, L.; Müller, T.J.J. 3,10-Diaryl Phenothiazines—One-pot Synthesis and Conformational Tuning of Ground and Excited State Electronics. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 2021, 3516–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krämer, C.S.; Zeitler, K.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis of (Hetero)Aryl Bridged and Directly Linked Redox Active Phenothiazinyl Dyads and Triads. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8619–8624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sailer, M.; Franz, A.W.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis and Electronic Properties of Monodisperse Oligophenothiazines. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2602–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R.W. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krämer, C.S.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis and Electronic Properties of Alkynylated Phenothiazines. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2003, 3534–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hauck, M.; Stolte, M.; Schönhaber, J.; Kuball, H.-G.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis, Electronic and Electrooptical Properties of Emissive Solvatochromic Phenothiazinyl Merocyanine Dyes. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9984–9998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. May, L.; Müller, T.J.J. Widely Electronically Tunable 2,6-Disubstituted Dithieno [1,4]thiazines—Electron-Rich Fluorophores up to Intense NIR Emission. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 12978–12986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, L.; Feng, J.-K.; Ren, A.-M. Theoretical Study on Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Phenothiazine-Containing Conjugated Oligomers and Polymers. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5987–5996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zanello, P. Ferrocenes; Togni, A., Hayashi, T., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; pp. 317–430. [Google Scholar]
  29. CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, 10th ed.; CLSI Document M07-A10; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of tert-butyl (3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (5).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of tert-butyl (3-(3,7-dibromo-10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propyl)carbamate (5).
Molecules 29 02126 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-phenothiazines 7 and 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-phenothiazines 7 and 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
Molecules 29 02126 sch002
Figure 1. Normalized absorption (solid) and emission (dashed) spectra of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8 (recorded at T = 298 K for c(8) = 10−3 m (absorption) and c(8) = 10−6 m (emission) in dichloromethane).
Figure 1. Normalized absorption (solid) and emission (dashed) spectra of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8 (recorded at T = 298 K for c(8) = 10−3 m (absorption) and c(8) = 10−6 m (emission) in dichloromethane).
Molecules 29 02126 g001
Table 1. Selected electronic data (oxidation potential, absorption maxima, emission maxima, Stokes shifts) of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-phenothiazines 7 and 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
Table 1. Selected electronic data (oxidation potential, absorption maxima, emission maxima, Stokes shifts) of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl) 10H-phenothiazines 7 and 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
CompoundE00/+1 [V] [a]E0+1/+2 [V] [a]E0+2/+3 [V] [a]Absorption λmax,abs [nm] (ε [m−1cm−1]) [b]Emission λmax,em [nm] [c]Stokes Shift ∆ ν ˜ [cm−1] [d]
7a0.6200.7400.850279 (111,000), 320 (45,000), 367 (37,000sh)483, 499 (sh)6500
7b0.6401.290-280 (108,000), 330 (26,000)4619300
7c0.6901.260-290 (42,000), 347 (14,000)4888300
7d0.7001.400-277 (17,000), 330 (41,000)4719500
7e0.730--280 (35,000), 333 (9000)4889500
7f0.830--292 (33,000), 373 (12,000)5207600
8a0.6100.7200.830276 (83,000), 322 (31,000), 368 (26,000)4786300
8b0.6801.040-278 (64,000), 324 (15,000)4558900
8c0.7201.260-278 (40,000), 326 (10,000)4669200
8d0.7301.270-275 (26,000), 323 (6000)4569000
8e0.770--289 (53,000), 342 (18,000)4788300
8f0.840--288 (54,000), 359 (7000)5007900
[a] Cyclic voltammograms were recorded in dichloromethane at T = 293 K. [b] Recorded at T = 293 K in dichloromethane at c(7/8) = 10−3 m. [c] Recorded in dichloromethane at T = 293 K at c(7/8) = 10−6 m. [d] ∆ ν ˜ = 1/λmax,abs − 1/λmax,em [cm−1] (calculated using the bold absorption bands).
Table 2. MIC of compounds 8a, 8b, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 9 (stock solutions of the substances of approx. 10 mm in a volume of 1 mL DMSO (spectroscopy grade)).
Table 2. MIC of compounds 8a, 8b, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 9 (stock solutions of the substances of approx. 10 mm in a volume of 1 mL DMSO (spectroscopy grade)).
Molecules 29 02126 i001
Antibacterial Activity MIC (µm)
CompoundMW [g/mol]Weighed Portion [mg]Concentration [mm]M. tuberculosisS. aureus ATCC 29213E. coli ATCC 25922P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853A. baumannii ATCC 747K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883
9448.54.5310.1100>100>100>100>100>100
8a1784.69.895.5>100>100>100>100>100>100
8b660.86.6210.02512.5>100>100100>100
8d600.76.0110.012.56.25251002512.5
8e669.66.6910.012.512.5>100>10050>100
8f650.76.5010.02512.5>100>100>100>100
Table 3. Experimental details of the Suzuki synthesis of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl)10H-phenothiazines 7.
Table 3. Experimental details of the Suzuki synthesis of Boc-protected 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-aminopropyl)10H-phenothiazines 7.
EntryDibromide 5Boronic Acid/Pinacol Boronate 6CsFPd(PPh3)41,4-DioxaneCompound 7 (Yield)
11.03 g (2.00 mmol)1.81 g (4.40 mmol) of 6a1.94 g
(12.8 mmol)
139 mg (0.12 mmol)20 mL1.56 g (85%) of 7a
2722 mg (1.40 mmol)511 mg (3.36 mmol) of 4-methoxyphenyl boronic acid (6b)1.36 g
(8.97 mmol)
84 mg
(0.07 mmol)
14 mL630 mg (79%) of 7b
3514 mg (1.00 mmol)462 mg (2.20 mmol) of pinacol 2-thienyl boronate (6c)973 mg
(6.40 mmol)
69 mg
(0.06 mmol)
10 mL510 mg (69%) of 7c
4771 mg (1.50 mmol)402 mg (3.30 mmol) of phenyl boronic acid (6d)1.45 g
(9.60 mmol)
104 mg
(0.09 mmol)
15 mL560 mg (74%) of 7d
5771 mg (1.50 mmol)787 mg (3.30 mmol) of 4-chlorophenyl boronic acid (6e)1.46 g
(9.60 mmol)
104 mg
(0.09 mmol)
15 mL660 mg (76%) of 7e
6722 mg (1.40 mmol)1.36 g (8.97 mmol) of 4-cyanophenyl boronic acid (6f)1.36 g (8.97 mmol)84 mg
(0.07 mmol)
14 mL530 mg (67%) of 7f
Table 4. Experimental details of the formation of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
Table 4. Experimental details of the formation of 3,7-di(hetero)aryl-substituted 10-(3-trimethylammoniumpropyl)10H-phenothiazine salts 8.
EntryCompound 7DichloromethaneTrifluoro Acidic AcidPotassium CarbonateMethyl Iodide/Methyl TriflateCompound 8 (Yield)
1910 mg
(0.99 mmol) of 7a
10 mL903 μL
(7.92 mmol)
2.76 g
(20.0 mmol)
623 μL
(9.90 mmol) of methyl iodide
823 mg (93%) of 8a 1
2329 mg
(0.58 mmol) of 7b
6 mL354 μL
(4.63 mmol)
1.60 g
(11.6 mmol)
634 μL
(5.79 mmol) of methyl triflate
256 mg (67%) of 8b 2
3200 mg
(0.39 mmol) of 7c
4 mL237 μL
(3.08 mmol)
1.06 g
(7.69 mmol)
420 μL
(3.85 mmol) of methyl triflate
239 mg (59%) of 8c 2
4250 mg
(0.49 mmol) of 7d
5 mL302 μL
(3.93 mmol)
1.36 g
(9.82 mmol)
537 μL
(4.91 mmol) of methyl triflate
239 mg (81%) of 8d 2
5250 mg
(0.43 mmol) of 7e
4 mL267 μL
(3.49 mmol)
1.19 g
(8.64 mmol)
473 μL
(4.32 mmol) of methyl triflate
205 mg (71%) of 8e 2
6200 mg
(0.44 mmol) of 7f
4 mL267 μL
(3.49 mmol)
1.36 g
(9.82 mmol)
493 μL
(4.36 mmol) of methyl triflate
150 mg (53%) of 8f 2
1 Obtained as carbonate. 2 Obtained as a triflate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khelwati, H.; van Geelen, L.; Kalscheuer, R.; Müller, T.J.J. Synthesis, Electronic, and Antibacterial Properties of 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted Phenothiazinyl N-Propyl Trimethylammonium Salts. Molecules 2024, 29, 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092126

AMA Style

Khelwati H, van Geelen L, Kalscheuer R, Müller TJJ. Synthesis, Electronic, and Antibacterial Properties of 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted Phenothiazinyl N-Propyl Trimethylammonium Salts. Molecules. 2024; 29(9):2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khelwati, Hilla, Lasse van Geelen, Rainer Kalscheuer, and Thomas J. J. Müller. 2024. "Synthesis, Electronic, and Antibacterial Properties of 3,7-Di(hetero)aryl-substituted Phenothiazinyl N-Propyl Trimethylammonium Salts" Molecules 29, no. 9: 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092126

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop