Next Article in Journal
Diagnostics of Interior PM Machine Rotor Faults Based on EMF Harmonics
Previous Article in Journal
Empowering Students to Create Climate-Friendly Schools
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resilience of Natural Gas Pipeline System: A Review and Outlook
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Convex Relaxations of Maximal Load Delivery for Multi-Contingency Analysis of Joint Electric Power and Natural Gas Transmission Networks

Energies 2024, 17(9), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092200
by Byron Tasseff *, Carleton Coffrin and Russell Bent
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Energies 2024, 17(9), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092200
Submission received: 28 February 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 19 April 2024 / Published: 3 May 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

The article provides a thorough analysis of the interdependencies between gas and electric transmission systems and proposes a mixed-integer convex relaxation approach for solving the Maximal Load Delivery (MLD) problem. This approach enables efficient estimation of severe contingencies' impacts on joint networks, offering a quick and accurate methodology for multi-contingency scenario analysis.

However, some aspects could be improved:

· There is missing. more detailed justification of model that accounts for dynamic changes in network conditions (for Model 1).

· Authors have to expand the interdependencies between gas and power networks especially the impact of gas supply disruptions on power generation capacity.

· The choice of solver parameters (Table 1) and their impact on the outcomes of the computational experiments are not discussed in article.

· Authors did not discuss the specific conditions under which the MICP relaxation fail.

Questions for the authors:

1. How do the simplified modeling assumptions in (3) align with operational characteristics of gas-fired generators, particularly under extreme conditions?

2. How does the model account for the dynamic nature of gas and power demands, especially during peak usage periods or unexpected contingencies?

3. What measures have been taken to validate the model, particularly for the joint operation of gas and power networks?

4. How do the proposed convex relaxations affect the model's ability to identify critical network components and prioritize restoration efforts?

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop