Next Article in Journal
The Chemical Profiles and Antioxidant Properties of Live Fruit or Vegetable Vinegars Available on the Polish Food Market
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Citrate-Esterified Starch and Enzymatically Debranched Starch and Their Effects on Diabetic Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pasta Drying Defects as a Novel Ingredient for Hard Dough Biscuits: Effect of Drying Temperature and Granulation on Its Functionality

by
Jafar Mohammadzadeh Milani
1,*,
Saeed Moammaei
1,2,
Sepideh Haghighat Kharazi
1,3 and
Maryam Mohammadi Berenjestanaki
1
1
Department of Food Science and Technology, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari P.O. Box 578, Iran
2
Department of Quality Control, Zarkam Company, Zar Industrial and Research Group, Hashtgerd 1991793963, Iran
3
Department of Research and Development, Ardineh Iran Company Group, Ghaemshahr P.O. Box 47645/333, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(10), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101487
Submission received: 1 January 2024 / Revised: 18 February 2024 / Accepted: 21 February 2024 / Published: 11 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Grain)

Abstract

:
Various drying temperatures impact the texture of pasta and cause different drying defects. These by-products could reflect techno-functional characteristics which are suitable for cereal products. This research addresses the influence of low (LT) and high (HT) drying pasta defects with two granulations on the theoretical and functional characteristics of hard dough biscuits. By shifting from a LT to HT drying temperature, a higher onset and peak temperature was found due to the higher mobility of starch molecules with increasing crystalline stability. The lowest transition enthalpy of biscuit formulation was also observed for higher incorporation of fine HT pasta regrinds. The algebraic model of dough with consistography determined the poor-extensible gluten and a high resistance with a greater value of P/L and P indices for LT regrinds. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a heavy and dense texture with immersed starch granules for additional fine regrinds while coarse samples caused swell granules with greater diameter. Moreover, fine HT regrinds reflected the lowest L* value for biscuit due to heat gradient tension with the hard milling process which leads to protein denaturation with decreasing nitrogenous.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Food wastes are generated in different forms and phases during physical or chemical processing. The aforementioned by-products are known as the functional source for recycling and conversion. One of the common processes to manage waste is using by-products in food ingredients which can retain the raw material nutrients [1]. Pasta and its products are prepared with semolina flour, water, and some optional ingredients. Blending and dampening with water can convert the flour into hydrated dough. To achieve the desired pasta texture, a continuous extrusion process must be applied. The last fundamental step involves the drying section, which comprises dehydrating final products to below 12% moisture [2]. There are some critical points of pasta production when considering the various sections and processes. Any technological maladjustment at each step causes defects in the final product. Pasta drying involves two critical characteristics: the drying temperature and dehydrating method. Due to the functional superiority of high-temperature dried pasta, the drying temperature and its periods have changed from 45- to 100 °C for some decades [3]. It could be concluded that the dried structure of pasta was considered a continuous matrix with entrapped starch granules in a coagulated region of the protein. By modifying the drying temperature, the pasta dehydrating treatment would be changed [3]. Generally, after supplying in the drying section, extruded dough moisture is removed from the surface via the hot air flow. Due to the applied gradient, moisture begins to diffuse from the core to the surface of the pasta strings [4]. Drying faults, such as internal cracking, burnt texture, and case hardening, occur individually at the beginning of the drying due to the application of high temperatures in a short time. In the pasta industry, by-products can be milled to the fine powder which is known as the pasta regrinds [5]. Based on the functionality of these regrinds, they can be blended with semolina to manufacture different types of pasta or mixed with flour to produce bread. These wastes are about 5 to 10 percent of the final dry products which are collected from different parts of production. To extend and optimize pasta regrinds, they could be applied as an ingredient in other starchy food matrices such as biscuits. They are long shelf-life products due to their low moisture content and are composed of wheat flour, sucrose, shortening, and other functional ingredients. Hard dough biscuits, in comparison with other wheat-based foods, need a weaker gluten-containing flour which is baked in flattened and thin layer forms. Moreover, pasta production causes starch damage and protein denaturation which leads to an enhanced harder and brittle structure. In this research, the effects of different levels of (LT and HT) pasta regrinds on dough rheology, as well as the microstructure and texture of biscuits and their intermolecular bonds, were investigated. By taking regrind granulations into consideration, their functionality as a coarse and fine additional ingredient was evaluated.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Materials

Regarding the biscuit preparation, wheat flour was purchased from Gandomkoob flour mill company (Behshahr, Iran) with %10.5 protein content and %29 wet gluten. Glucose syrup (DE = 42, Zar Fructose Co., Hashtgerd, Iran), icing sugar, mineral salt (Taban Co., Tehran, Iran), sodium bicarbonate (Ardineh group, Ghaemshahr, Iran), sodium acid pyrophosphate (Fooding Co., Shanghai, China) and wheat starch (Zar Industrial Group, Hashtgerd, Iran) were bought commercially.

2.2. Pasta Defects Preparation

All of the low temperature dryers in pasta producing are the kind of cabinet dryers which use 50 to 65 °C with one or twin circulator fans. Low-temperature pasta defects were produced in the Maghoul pasta plant (Gorgan, Iran). The granular pasta flour was blended with B-carotene 10% (DSM, Heerlen, Switzerland) and hydrated to 30% moisture. A two-step parallel kneader with thin blades was employed to dampen the dough at 70 RPM. Then, a cylindrical extrusion powered using an 8.5 kW electromotor extruded the hydrated dough to prepare pasta with a length of 40 mm and an inner diameter of 15 mm. The extruded doughs were moved to the dryer and placed at the center of the chamber. To remove available water from the surface of the dough, twin air circulation fans were applied to create a great moisture gradient content. Due to the intensive thermal kinetics of keeping the temperature at 65 °C [6], surface burnings occurred at the beginning of drying. Burnt-texture spaghetti was milled in two steps and sieved with a laboratory plansifter; samples were categorized into fine and coarse granulations. High-temperature dried pasta was purchased from Zarmacaron Company (Hashtgerd, Iran) and dried at 95 °C in a continuous spaghetti line. After preparation, samples were milled and sieved as mentioned earlier.

2.3. Biscuit Preparation

According to [7], optimized formulations with some modifications were used to prepare the biscuit. Aimed at 100 g of biscuit, 53 g wheat flour, 13 g icing sugar, 12 g margarine, 0.4 g sodium bicarbonate, 0.4 g sodium acid pyrophosphate, 0.2 g distilled monoglycerides, 1 g wheat starch, 1.8 g glucose syrup, and 0.2 g salt were selected as the main recipe to prepare the dough. By adding 18 mL water, all ingredients were mixed using a mixer (KitchenAid Inc., St. Joseph, MI, USA) at level VI for 7 min. After mixing, they were hand kneaded for 30 s and rested for 15 min at 4 °C. The dough pieces were then sheeted (Sinmag-SM-520S, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) by diminishing their thickness to 2 mm and rested for another 15 min. Finally, the doughs were shaped with a cutting ring of 25 mm and 2 cm diameter. The biscuits were then baked in the air electrical oven at 175 °C and airflow set (level I) for 12 min (UNOX- Italy- oven section). The prepared biscuits were cooled for 60 min and stored in zip bags for further tests. Additional samples were prepared by substituting wheat flour with 30, 50, and 60 percent pasta defect flours (regrind) which were dried at low and high temperatures with coarse and fine granulations.

2.4. Physicochemical Characteristics of Flour

The analysis of biscuit flour with LT and HT regrinds for physicochemical characteristics was conducted for the moisture, ash content, protein, and wet gluten using NIRs instruments (Foss, DS2500 L, Hillerød, Denmark). By adding 50 g of each treatment, the sample cup was loaded onto the device. Different wavelength ranges with collected spectral dates would predict various quality attributes [8].

2.5. Alveographic Assay

Dough tenacity (P), dough extensibility (L), index of swelling (G), dough baking strength (W), and configuration of the curve (P/L) of wheat flour incorporated with pasta regrinds were calculated at the optimum hydration using Chopin NG Alveograph® (Villeneuve-la-Garenne, France) [9].

2.6. Consistography Assay

Blended wheat flour with various mass ratios of pasta defect flours was analyzed using a consistograph (Chopin Technologies, Villeneuve-la-Garenne, France) to calculate the water absorption capacity.

2.7. Physical Characteristics of Biscuit

2.7.1. Dimensions and Spread Ratio

The 2D dimensions of each biscuit were measured with a Vernier Calliper (CD-6″ CSX, Mitutoyo Corporation, Sakado, Japan). The diameter was calculated on two orthogonal sections which was provided as the average value. By measuring the height of well-formed biscuits in two rows and their horizontal measurements, the spread ratio was obtained by dividing diameter by height. The measurements were applied to five biscuit samples [10].

2.7.2. Three-Point Bend Test

To measure the hardness value of baked biscuits, a 3-point bending rig (HDP/3 PB) with a 10 g load cell (Brookfield® CT3, Engineering Labs, Middleboro, MA, USA) was conducted. Samples were placed between the support beams at a distance of 1 mm. A central beam was adjusted to move and break the biscuit. Pre-test, test, and post-test speeds were set, respectively, at 1.0, 2.0, and 10.0 [7]. All the measurements were taken in triplicate.

2.7.3. Crust Color

The color of the baked biscuits with different formulations was measured in terms of Hunter L, a, and b values using a spectro-colorimeter [11]. All the tests were completed in triplicate.

2.8. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis (FTIR)

FTIR spectroscopy of the biscuit incorporated with pasta drying defects was analyzed using a FTIR spectrophotometer (FT-IR, Cary 630, Santa Clara, Agilent, CA, USA). To study the FTIR spectra, 0.5 mg of each sample was mounted on the device and scanned from 600 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 [12].

2.9. Solvent Retention Capacity

The solvent retention capacity method was applied to evaluate the functional variables as follows: water holding capacity, swelling power of glutenin, and starch damage as described by [13]. Samples were mixed with respective solvents (distilled water, 5% Na2CO3, 5% lactic acid). Then, the suspension was sent to a centrifuge device and the test was performed at 1000× g for 15 min. After drip drying, the swollen section was measured. All the measurements were taken in triplicate.

2.10. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (Zufa, 11054, Shanghai, China) was performed to measure the starch gelatinization. A total of 3–6 mg of biscuit flour with pasta regrinds was weighed and hydrated with a distilled water ratio of 1/3. The applied temperature gradient with 10 c/min varied from 30 °C to 95 °C [14].

2.11. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

To determine the effect of low- and high-temperature pasta defects on biscuit textures, the microstructures of samples were analyzed through SEM (SNE-4500M, Suwon, Korea). The freeze-dried biscuit samples were mounted on an aluminum sample holder, having a diameter of (12 mm) and covered with a thin layer of gold. The magnifications of 30× and 150× were selected under an acceleration voltage of 20 kV to photograph the microstructure [15].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

A one-way ANOVA of the Infostat v.9.0 software was used to evaluate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) among samples for some experiments. Differences between means were identified using Duncan’s multiple comparison test. The treatment analysis was performed in three replicates.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mixed Flour Characteristics

The compositional results of wheat flour containing pasta regrind are presented in Table 1. Each regrind substitution reflects different moisture content for the aforementioned treatments which were in line with the pasta drying temperature (LT and HT) and milling pressure (Fine and Coarse). Particle size distribution could influence the water content and hydration rate of each treatment. Fine regrinds indicate the lowest moisture content with the highest water absorption among the samples. On the other hand, wet gluten and protein content was raised with the incorporation of coarse pasta regrinds.

3.2. Alveographic Properties

Rheological analysis of biscuit flour with LT and HT regrinds was performed based on the determinations using the Chopin Alveolab to determine various phases of dough processing during the baking process (sheeting, rounding, and molding). The results presented significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) for most of the alveographic parameters (Table 2). An optimal P/L factor could be 0.2 for short dough products, whereas the ratio nearing 1.0 was chosen for voluminous bread. B5HC5 and B4HF6 had a P/L ranging between 0.19 and 0.2 like control flour [16]. However, biscuit dough incorporated with low-temperature pasta regrinds showed the highest P/L, whereas the extensibility parameter of dough which was reflected by L indices decreased drastically. These values showed poor-extensible gluten structure with high resistance to deformation [17]. To the best of our knowledge, these results could be related to the lower protein denaturation of LT regrinds due to the low-temperature drying and extruding during pasta making. Based on the close relation between W indices and gluten structure, biscuit dough samples could be categorized based on the W value. B4HF6 and B5HC5 indicated the lowest values for W indices. This finding revealed that high-temperature drying regrinds with fine granulation caused poor gluten strength for the control sample. Additionally, the P indices of dough samples indicated the same tendency of P/L value. It was also related positively to the water-holding capacity and negatively to moisture content. B4LF6 presented the lowest value of P indices due to higher starch content of fine regrinds for low-temperature drying methods [18].

3.3. Physical Properties

The physical characteristics of the biscuits, including thickness, diameter, weight, spread ratio, and hardness are listed in Table 3. The spread ratio of cooked biscuits was increased with an increase in coarse LT and HT pasta regrinds. This parameter is influenced by the protein structure, which affects the binding properties of biscuit texture. Moreover, the used flour granulation could be related to the water-holding capacity of the flour. As water-holding capacity increased, spread ratio parameters showed a higher value [9]. B5LC5 and B5HC5, with the incorporation of coarse regrinds, reflected the highest spread ratio among the treatments. Formulated biscuit diameters varied from 32.60 to 34.50 mm, whereas the thickness changed from 3.00 to 5.40 mm (Figure 1). To the best of our knowledge, these results could be due to the addition of LT and HT fine regrinds which influence the biscuit texture by increasing diameter and decreasing thickness [19].
In the three-point bending test, the hardness parameter of biscuits was measured under the title of texture resistance to the breaking. The results indicated that the least hardness was related to the B5HC5 and B5LC5, which were formulated by the addition of coarse LT and HT regrinds. This result could be understood as there being more porosity structure with weakened gluten network prepared using granular regrinds [20].

3.4. Color

The crust color of baked biscuits was analyzed using L (lightness), a (redness), and b (yellowness) parameters (Table 3). Colorimetry measurements indicated that formulated biscuits with HT and fine regrinds had a lower L* value in comparison with the other samples. They also gave significantly higher a* and b* degrees in the analysis which reflect a significantly high red hue. The differences in color parameters were especially found for B5LC5 with higher intensity of Maillard browning reaction [6]. This finding could be related to the drying and milling processes of pasta. Coarse regrinds with low-temperature drying imposed a lower mechanical force and heat tension. The aforementioned parameters caused lower protein denaturation, and more amino acids with reducing sugars would be available for the Maillard browning reaction. Conversely, a high drying temperature with a hard milling process for fine granulation leads to protein denaturation with decreasing nitrogenous bases, thereby reducing the protein percentage [21].

3.5. FTIR

FTIR spectroscopy was performed to detect functional groups of pasta regrinds with biscuit flour (Figure 2). Infrared spectroscopy analysis proved that all biscuit flour with the incorporation of LT and HT regrinds had close spectra peaks in the same wavenumber regions. Common peaks at 994.01 cm−1 to 994.4 cm−1 presented starchy content due to the vibration of glycosidic bonds [22]. The transmittance bands at 1076.81 cm−1 to 1077.16 cm−1 regions also displayed the stretching vibration of the C–O–H group and reflected the amorphous region of starch. B7HF3 showed the lowest transmittance percentage due to the presence of fine regrinds, which leads to a more amorphous state of starch. The region of frequencies around 3272.9 and 3277.03 cm−1 were attributed mainly to O-H bond starching [11]. By increasing the coarse form of pasta regrinds, the intensity of O-H bonds were also reinforced. This result might be related to intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds of water which were involved with starch. Additionally, important peaks in the region of 1637.17 cm−1 to 1646.96 cm−1 specified the presence of the amide I band which originated from the stretching vibration of the C=O bond. Higher absorptions were recorded for control and B7HF3 samples in comparison with the other treatments. This result indicated that high-temperature drying pasta regrinds with fine granulation had no significant side effect for the gluten networks of the control flour. However, the lowest intensity of amid I band for B5LC5 was observed as a result of coarse low-temperature pasta regrinds supplementation.

3.6. Solvent Retention Capacity

The solvent retention of biscuit flours with the incorporation of HT and LT pasta regrinds were influenced by the main components such as protein and starch (Table 3). Each component solvation in the selected solvent determines the swelling behavior of polymers. Distilled water (W-RC), lactic acid in water (La-RC), and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3-RC) were used for water retention capacity, analyzing the swelling power of glutenin and starch damage. By decreasing the swelling power of glutenin, a reduction in La-RC value for B4LF6 was observed. Moreover, the drying process with multiple grinding actions for B7LF3 caused a higher water-holding capacity (W-RC), due to more starch damage and the gelatinization degree. The water retention capacity of B7LF3 increased significantly with the addition of fine and low-temperature drying regrinds in comparison with the control sample [23]. The value of La-RC for fine HT regrinds was greater than Na2CO3-RC. This outcome could be related to the outstanding role of glutenin for water binding against the LT and biscuit flour. The value of Na2CO3-RC indicates an increasing trend for formulations with HT regrinds. B5HC5, with the highest sodium carbonate swelling power value, reflects the starch damage in the retention capacity. In addition to the naturally damaged starch content through the action of α-amylases, regrinds could present gelatinized and retrograded granules with greater damaged starch content. A high-temperature drying process with the milling step could be known as the main factor damaging starch in regrinds.

3.7. DSC

The gelatinization of starch with changes in DSC endotherms was analyzed via differential scanning calorimetry measurements (Table 3). The results indicated the effect of drying processes (LT or HT) on the thermal behavior of starch granules in biscuits. Increasing the drying temperature of pasta regrinds resulted in a higher onset and peak temperature in comparison with the control sample. This result in B4FH6 sample could be backed by the higher mobility of starch molecules with increasing crystalline stability according to the results of [24]. The lowest transition enthalpy rate was also found for B4FH6, with the highest incorporation of high-temperature drying pasta regrind. This result could be expected by imposing an extrusion process and higher drying temperature which create gelatinized and retrograded starch granules. The aforementioned composition also required less energy to melt granules which is in agreement with the previous study [25]. On the other hand, for LT pasta regrinds, starch granules were initiated to melt with a 5 to 10 °C difference lower than the control sample. The reason for the results could be due to the lower temperature requirement for melting starch in fine-LT regrinds, which were incorporated with biscuit flour resulting in a lower stability product during heating.

3.8. Microstructural Characteristics

The microstructures of baked biscuits were analyzed through SEM to observe the characteristics of the immersed starch granules. Visual magnifications of 30× and 150× of all biscuit formulations were depicted in (Figure 3). SEM micrographs indicated the smooth starch granules for the control biscuit. For the B5LC5 sample, coarse LT pasta regrinds exhibited more starch granules with greater diameter in some regions. Swollen starch granules of the intended biscuit reflect the higher capacity of water holding due to the lower extrusion pressure, heat tension, and grinding force in the coarse LT method. However, the fine granulation of additional pasta regrinds caused the immersed starch granules with greater dispersion [26]. The B4LF6 sample microstructure with fine LT regrinds revealed a heavy and dense texture with a high number of fused granules. By observation of biscuit samples with fine HT regrinds, starch granules lost their granular identity proportional to HT regrinds added. Imposing a higher extrusion and grinding pressure to starch granules exhibited greater starch damage values for fine HT and LT regrinds. This reason for the finding could be backed by the unbalanced ability of water absorption which exposed the granules to more aggressive enzymes [26]. These results were in agreement with the alveographic parameter (P/L) variation for rheological analysis.

4. Conclusions

The experiment results highlighted that LT and HT pasta regrinds with various granulations (p ≤ 0.05) influence the rheological behavior of biscuit doughs and the final product. The results showed that as much as the HT regrinds increased, the influence of starch damage and gelatinization degree increased and a greater capacity of water-holding (W-RC) was observed. Moreover, the reduction in extensibility for biscuit dough incorporated with LT regrinds was determined by increasing P/L indices. It was also concluded that the P parameter presents the same tendency of P/L for treatments. B5LC5 and B5HC5, with the incorporation of coarse regrind, reflected the highest spread ratio with more starch granules and greater diameter in some regions in SEM observation; whereas, fine granulation pasta regrinds caused the immersed starch granules with greater dispersion. Calculated 3-point-bend analysis of biscuits indicated that coarse LT and HT regrinds reflected the least content of hardness which could be related to more porosity structure with weakened gluten network. This research indicated that pasta regrinds, based on their techno-functional characteristics of drying temperature and granulation, could be feasible ingredients for products that do not require long-proofing such as biscuits.

Author Contributions

J.M.M.: Project administration, Investigation, Review and Editing, Funding acquisition—S.M.: Conceptualization, Writing, Investigation—S.H.K.: Investigation, Resources—M.M.B.: Investigation and experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (Project no. 02-1401-19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Saeed Moammaei was employed by the Zarkam Company. The contribution of the author in the paper is investigation, conceptualization and writing. However, Zarkam Company did not contribute neither financially, nor in the optimization, analysis of the results, or writing of the paper.) Therefore, there is no conflict of interest in relation with Zarkam Company. Author Sepideh Haghighat Kharazi was employed by the Ardineh Iran Company Group. The contribution of the author in the paper is investigation and resources. However, Ardineh Iran Company Group did not contribute neither financially, nor in the optimization, analysis of the results, or writing of the paper.) Therefore, there is no conflict of interest in relation with Ardineh Iran Company Group. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oreopoulou, V.; Russ, W. Utilization of by-Products and Treatment of Waste in the Food Industry; Conference Proceedings; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Peña, E.; Manthey, F.A.; Patel, B.K.; Campanella, O.H. Rheological properties of pasta dough during pasta extrusion: Effect of moisture and dough formulation. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Donnelly, B.J. Pasta regrinds: Effect on Spaghetti quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1980, 28, 806–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zweifel, C.; Handschin, S.; Escher, F.; Conde-Petit, B. Influence of High-Temperature Drying on Structural and Textural Properties of Durum Wheat Pasta. Cereal Chem. 2003, 80, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nobile, M.A.; Baiano, A.; Conte, A.; Mocci, G. Influence of protein content on spaghetti cooking quality. Cereal Sci. 2005, 41, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fang, K.; Khan, K. Pasta containing regrinds: Effect of high temperature drying on product quality. Cereal Chem. 1996, 73, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin, C.; Hélène Morel, M.; Reau, A.; Cuq, B. Kinetics of gluten protein-insolubilisation during pasta processing: Decoupling between time- and temperature-dependent effects. Cereal Sci. 2019, 88, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kouhsari, F.; Saberi, F.; Łukasz Kowalczewski, P.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Kieliszek, M. Effect of the various fats on the structural characteristics of the hard dough biscuit. LWT 2022, 159, 113227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dowell, F.E.; Maghirang, E.B.; Xie, F.; Lookhart, G.L.; Pierce, R.O.; Seabourn, B.W.; Bean, S.R.; Wilson, J.D.; Chung, O.K. Predicting wheat quality characteristics and functionality using near-infrared spectroscopy. Cereal Chem. 2006, 83, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bouazizi, S.; Montevecchi, G.; Antonelli, A.; Hamdi, M. Effects of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) peel flour as an innovative ingredient in biscuits formulation. LWT 2020, 124, 109155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cronin, K.; Preis, C. A statistical analysis of biscuit physical properties as affected by Baking. Food Eng. 2000, 46, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sadeghi Vasafi, P.; Hamdami, N.; Keramat, J. Quality and microbial stability of part-baked ‘Barbari bread’ during freezing storage. LWT 2019, 104, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adebiyi, J.A.; Obadina, A.O.; Mulaba-Bafubiandi, A.F.; Adebo, O.A.; Kayitesi, E. Effect of fermentation and malting on the microstructure and selected physicochemical properties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) flour and biscuit. Cereal Sci. 2016, 70, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mamat, H.; Hardan, M.A.; Hill, S.E. Physicochemical properties of commercial semi-sweet biscuit. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, A.; Krishnamoorth, E.; Devi1, H.M.; Uchoi1, D.; Tejpal, C.S.; Ninan, G.; Zynudhee, A.A. Influence of sea grapes (Caulerpa racemosa) supplementation on physical, functional, and anti-oxidant properties of semi-sweet biscuits. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 30, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adedara, O.A.; Taylo, J.R. Roles of protein, starch and sugar in the texture of sorghum biscuits. LWT 2020, 136, 110323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rai, A.; Singh, A.; Ganjewala, D.; Kumar, R.R.; Ahlawat, A.K.; Singh, S.K.; Sharma, P.; Jain, N. Rheological evaluations and molecular marker analysis of cultivated bread wheat varieties of India. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1696–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Renzetti, S.; Dal Bello, F.; Arendt, E.K. Microstructure, fundamental rheology and baking characteristics of batters and breads from different gluten-free flours treated with a microbial transglutaminase. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cappelli, A.; Bini, A.; Cini, E. The Effects of Storage Time and Environmental Storage Conditions on Flour Quality, Dough Rheology, and Biscuit Characteristics: The Case Study of a Traditional Italian Biscuit (Biscotto di Prato). Foods 2022, 11, 11020209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simons, C.W.; Hall, C. Consumer acceptability of gluten-free cookies containing raw cooked and germinated pinto bean flours. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 6, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Monisha, C.; Loganathan, M. Impact of drying methods on the physicochemical properties and nutritional composition of defatted black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) pre-pupae flour. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 46, e16184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kamble, D.B.; Singh, S.; Rani, S.; Pratap, D. Physicochemical properties, in vitro digestibility and structural attributes of okara-enriched functional pasta. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yue, P.; Rayas-Duarte, P.; Elias, E. Effect of drying temperature on physicochemical properties of starch isolated from pasta. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petitot, M.; Brossard, C.; Barron, C.; Larré, C.; Morel, M.H.; Micard, V. Modification of pasta structure induced by high drying temperatures. Effects on the in vitro digestibility of protein and starch fractions and the potential allergenicity of protein hydrolysates. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stuknytė, M.; Cattaneo, S.; Pagani, M.A.; Marti, A.; Micard, V.; Hogenboom, J.; Noni, I.D. Spaghetti from durum wheat: Effect of drying conditions on heat damage, ultrastructure and in vitro digestibility. Food Chem. 2014, 149, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sissons, M.; Cutill, S.; Marcotuli, I.; Gadaleta, A. Impact of durum wheat protein content on spaghetti in vitro starch digestion and technological properties. Cereal Sci. 2021, 98, 103156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative image of formulated biscuits slices and their geometrical differences. Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Figure 1. Representative image of formulated biscuits slices and their geometrical differences. Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Foods 13 01487 g001
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of control and formulated biscuits. Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of control and formulated biscuits. Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Foods 13 01487 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of biscuit microstructure for (A) Control, (B) B7LF3, (C) B5LC5, (D) B7HF3, (E) B5HC5, (F) B4LF6, and (G) B4HF6 (Magnifications = 35× and 100×). Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of biscuit microstructure for (A) Control, (B) B7LF3, (C) B5LC5, (D) B7HF3, (E) B5HC5, (F) B4LF6, and (G) B4HF6 (Magnifications = 35× and 100×). Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Foods 13 01487 g003
Table 1. Biscuit formulation with compositional characteristics of NIRs analysis.
Table 1. Biscuit formulation with compositional characteristics of NIRs analysis.
SampleIngredient (%)MoistureAshProteinWet GlutenWater Absorption
Biscuit FlourFine-Low Temperature Pasta RegrindCoarse-Low Temperature Pasta RegrindFine-High Temperature Pasta RegrindCoarse-High Temperature Pasta Regrind
Control100----13.500.511.7327.9653.93
B7LF37030---12.470.5311.6227.3755.21
B4LF64060---11.680.5611.4926.9856.18
B5LC550-50--12.260.5111.5128.1256.09
B7HF370--30-12.700.5211.6027.2355.67
B4HF640--60-11.890.5411.4126.6157.21
B5HC550---5012.420.5111.5428.3055.55
Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind.
Table 2. Alveographic measurements of control and substituted doughs.
Table 2. Alveographic measurements of control and substituted doughs.
ParametersControlB7LF3B4LF6B5LC5B7HF3B4HF6B5HC5
P58.66 ± 2.51 d114.33 ± 114.33 bc180 ± 37.04 a144.33 ± 5.51 bc171.66 ± 3.05 ab23.66 ± 19.35 e28 ± 16.09 e
G27.2 ± 1.73 a16.33 ± 0.33 b12.63 ± 2.54 b11.03 ± 0.23 b11.06 ± 0.45 b25.53 ± 6.68 a25.53 ± 5.51 a
W271 ± 12.49 a241.33 ± 241.3 ab226.33 ± 74.57 ab164 ± 3 b198.66 ± 16.56 ab66 ± 65 c72.33 ± 68.41 c
P/L0.39 ± 0.058 d2.11 ± 2.11 c5.73 ± 1.33 b5.86 ± 0.46 b6.89 ± 0.48 a0.2 ± 0.05 d0.197 ± 0.05 d
L151.33 ± 16.74 a54 ± 1.73 bc33.33 ± 12.42 c24.66 ± 1.15 c25 ± 2 c109 ± 65.39 ab136.33 ± 53.57 a
Hydration54.8±0.099a52.2±0.099b48±0.099f49.2±0.099d50.9±0.099c48.6±0.099e48±0.099f
Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind. P-maximum pressure (mm H2O), L-extensibility (mm), G-swelling index (mm), W-energy (J 10-4). P/L- ratio. Means (n = 3) with the different superscript lowercase letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Dimensional and physico-chemical characteristics, thermal transition parameters and SRC retention capacity for baked biscuits.
Table 3. Dimensional and physico-chemical characteristics, thermal transition parameters and SRC retention capacity for baked biscuits.
TestParametersControlB7LF3B4LF6B5LC5B7HF3B4HF6B5HC5
Physical propertiesDiameter32.68 ± 1.17 c32.616 ± 0.076 c33.78 ± 0.58 abc33.183 ± 0.17 bc33.63 ± 0.63 abc34.316 ± 0.8 ab34.5 ± 0.390512 a
Thickness5.28 ± 0.30 a3.733 ± 0.25 bc3.5 ± 0.1 bc3.066 ± 0.42 c3.5 ± 0.18 bc3.25 ± 0.13 bc3.416 ± 0.26 bc
Weight12.04 ± 0.09 a10.19 ± 0.08 d11.013 ± 0.08 b8.933 ± 0.057 e10.59 ± 0.056 c12.21 ± 0.02 a12.03 ± 0.1 a
Spread ratio0.69 ± 0.04 c0.91 ± 0.005774 b0.88 ± 0.01 b1.2 ± 0.025166 a1.026 ± 0.011547 a1.03 ± 0.005 a1.0 ± 0.01 a
Hardness (g)1251.83 ± 95.24 a1171.33 ± 192.87 a1195.166 ± 440.01 a413.16 ± 46.40 c898.33 ± 89.31 ab716.5 ± 54.43 bc548.5 ± 57.17 bc
ColorL71.06 ± 1.52 a66.54 ± 7.22 ab69.78 ± 4.22 a51.48 ± 2.46 c60.86 ± 5.87 b64.70 ± 4.71 ab47.92 ± 2.48 c
a6.92 ± 0.64 b8.85 ± 4.84 ab1.27 ± 3.7 c13.03 ± 1.7 a9.42 ± 1.25 ab7.11 ± 2.42 b12.62 ± 2.38 a
b36.32 ± 0.21 a34.53 ± 3.75 ab30.4 ± 1.44 c26.57 ± 0.92 d30.22 ± 2.55 c31.44 ± 1.89 bc25 ± 1 d
SRCWater3.14 ± 0.02 ab3.23 ± 0.34 a2.86 ± 0.037 cd3.019 ± 0.01 abc2.95 ± 0.01 bcd2.75 ± 0.04 d3.07 ± 0.02 abc
Lactic acid 5% (w/w)2.51 ± 0.11 b2.34 ± 0.13 c2.06 ± 0.06 d2.83 ± 0.015 a2.45 ± 0.05 bc2.73 ± 0.011 a2.73 ± 0.011 a
Sodium carbonate 5% (w/w)2.96 ± 0.05 a2.60 ± 0.11 b2.53 ± 0.11 b2.31 ± 0.09 c2.82 ± 0.01 a2.56 ± 0.13 b2.95 ± 0.005 a
DSCTo (°C)71.660.164.465.766.37771.5
Tp (°C)87.256.38788.191.992.390.4
Tc (°C)95.195.595.798.198.396.598.2
Transition enthalpy rate65.32%74.9576.43%69.9269.60%0.09%21.82%
Control = 100% biscuit flour; B7LF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine LT regrind; B4LF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine LT regrind; B5LC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse LT regrind; B7HF3 = 70% biscuit flour incorporated with 30% fine HT regrind; B4HF6 = 40% biscuit flour incorporated with 60% fine HT regrind; B5HC5 = 50% biscuit flour incorporated with 50% coarse HT regrind. Data were expressed as the mean of three replicates, given with their standard deviation. Means with the different superscript lowercase letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milani, J.M.; Moammaei, S.; Kharazi, S.H.; Berenjestanaki, M.M. Pasta Drying Defects as a Novel Ingredient for Hard Dough Biscuits: Effect of Drying Temperature and Granulation on Its Functionality. Foods 2024, 13, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101487

AMA Style

Milani JM, Moammaei S, Kharazi SH, Berenjestanaki MM. Pasta Drying Defects as a Novel Ingredient for Hard Dough Biscuits: Effect of Drying Temperature and Granulation on Its Functionality. Foods. 2024; 13(10):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milani, Jafar Mohammadzadeh, Saeed Moammaei, Sepideh Haghighat Kharazi, and Maryam Mohammadi Berenjestanaki. 2024. "Pasta Drying Defects as a Novel Ingredient for Hard Dough Biscuits: Effect of Drying Temperature and Granulation on Its Functionality" Foods 13, no. 10: 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop