Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Oat β-Glucans of Different Molar Mass on the Properties of Gluten-Free Bread
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical Modulators of Tight Junctions (TJs): Occludin, Claudin-2 and Zonulin as Biomarkers of Intestinal Barrier Leakage in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Progression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Fe Ions on Anode Performance and the Mechanism of Action during Copper Electrowinning Process

by
Cheng Jiang
1,2,
Yiwen Chen
1,3,
Yingping Zhou
3,4,
Buming Chen
1,3,4,*,
Hui Huang
1,3,4,
Jun Guo
1,3,4,*,
Ruidong Xu
1 and
Zhongcheng Guo
1,3,4
1
Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Low-Grade Refractory Gold Ores, Xiamen 361101, China
3
Research Center of Metallurgical Electrode Materials Engineering Technology, Kunming 650106, China
4
Kunming Hendera Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Kunming 650106, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4578; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194578
Submission received: 27 August 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 20 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024

Abstract

:
The performance of the anode varies from the impurity ions in the copper electrowinning process. This work focused on the variation of the electrochemical behavior of the Pb-0.06%Ca-1.2%Sn anode as the Fe ions (Fe3+ and/or Fe2+) existed in the electrolyte by electrochemical characterization. Copper electrodeposition experiments were conducted under a current density of 300 A/m2, with the Fe ion concentration in the electrolyte controlled within the range of 0 to 20 g/L and the Cu ion concentration maintained at 45 g/L at a temperature of 45 °C. The variation in the corrosion resistance, catalytic activity, and structural composition of the anode film layer was analyzed in-depth according to the presence of Fe ions. The results show that the structure of PbO2 on the surface of the film was changed as Fe ions doped into the anode film, and the oxygen evolution activity of the anode was also improved. However, the corrosion resistance decreased with increasing Fe3+ concentration. Furthermore, the addition of 2 g/L Fe2+ in the electrolyte containing 2 g/L Fe3+ led to an elevation in the corrosion resistance of the anode to some extent and further increased the oxygen evolution activity.

1. Introduction

Copper metal, renowned for its exceptional electrical and thermal conductivity alongside other metallic properties, finds widespread application in everyday necessities such as electricity, electronics, construction, transportation, industrial machinery manufacturing, and consumer goods [1]. Approximately 20% of industrial copper is obtained through electrolytic deposition, employing Pb−Ca−Sn alloy anodes in the electrodeposition process [2]. While much attention has been directed towards understanding the impact of impurity ions on cathode copper in the electrodeposition process, such as Co2+ [3,4], Ge3+ [5], Ni2+ [6,7], and Sb3+ [8], it is imperative to recognize that impurity ions also significantly influence the behavior of the anode.
During copper electrolysis, impurity ions like Mn [9] lead to unforeseen corrosive effects and other alterations on the anode, whereas Co ions exhibit favorable effects on lead anodes [10]. As the MnO2 layer forms and its thickness increases, the conductivity of the membrane decreases, and the oxygen evolution activity declines. The thickness of the MnO2 layer increases with higher manganese concentrations in the solution. However, the protective effect of the MnO2 layer does not improve linearly with increasing manganese ion concentration. This is attributed to the presence of an inert PbSO4 layer between the MnO2 and PbO2 layers. Consequently, as the MnO2 layer thickness increases, MnO2 becomes more prone to detachment, leading to the dissolution of the anode lead [11,12]. By adding Co2+ to the solution, the overpotential for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on the Pb anode decreases, and the potential stabilizes rapidly during constant current polarization. Additionally, the corrosion resistance of the Pb anode is significantly improved. This is primarily due to the oxidation of Co2+ to Co3+ during the OER process. Co3+ exhibits excellent catalytic activity for the OER, thereby enhancing the overall OER performance [13]. Additionally, there are documented effects of other metal ions, such as Ag+ and Al3+ [14,15,16]. In addition to the above impurity ions, Fe ions also play an important role in the hydrometallurgical copper refining process. Fe ions usually enter the electrolyte with the extraction process and exist in the electrolyte in the form of Fe3+ [17]. As the Fe content increases, the current efficiency gradually decreases. This phenomenon is attributed to the complex behavior of iron ions in the electrolyte, where Fe2⁺ is oxidized to Fe³⁺ at the anode and Fe³⁺ is reduced back to Fe2⁺ at the cathode [18]. This conversion occurring at the cathode affects copper deposition and reduces current efficiency. However, the presence of Fe can enhance the catalytic activity of the anode, effectively improving its catalytic performance and reducing energy consumption [17,19,20]. Current research has not yet investigated the role of the anode in the copper electrolysis process. Therefore, studying the impact of iron ions on the anode during the copper electrolysis process and understanding its mechanisms is important.
This study aims to investigate the impact of iron ions in the electrolyte on the anode during copper electrolysis. The electrochemical behavior of a Pb−0.06%Ca−1.2%Sn anode in iron-ion-containing electrolytes was examined, and the performance of the lead alloy anode was evaluated. In addition, a detailed analysis of the surface morphology and phase structure of the anode film, along with corresponding electrochemical results, was conducted to explore the role of iron ions. Specifically, the mechanisms underlying changes in the anode film in iron-ion-containing electrolytes were elucidated, confirming the effect of Fe ion concentration on the anode and current efficiency during copper electrodeposition. The optimal concentration of Fe ions in the copper electrolyte was identified, demonstrating that controlling the Fe concentration in the electrolyte during electrodeposition can enhance the oxygen evolution reaction catalytic activity of the anode, reduce energy consumption, and provide a theoretical foundation for the development of copper electrolysis in hydrometallurgical industries.

2. Experiment Section

2.1. Electrolyte Composition

The experiment utilized an electrolyte containing 180 g/L H2SO4 and 45 g/L Cu2+. To investigate the effects of different iron ion concentrations on the anode, the Fe2+ content in the electrolyte was controlled by adjusting the amount of FeSO4 added, while the Fe3+ content was controlled by varying the amount of Fe2(SO4)3 added, maintaining Fe2+ ion concentrations at 0 g/L, 2 g/L, 4 g/L, 8 g/L, and 16 g/L and Fe3+ ion concentrations at 0 g/L, 2 g/L, 4 g/L, 8 g/L, and 16 g/L. When exploring the effect of Fe3+ concentration, only Fe2(SO4)3 was added to adjust Fe3+ levels. For studying the combined effects of Fe2+ and Fe3+, the Fe3+: Fe2+ concentration ratios were adjusted to 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8. Analytical-grade reagents were used throughout the experiment to prevent interference from other ions in the electrolyte composition.

2.2. Anode Specimen Preparation and Electrochemical Testing

The anode specimens utilized in the experiments were fabricated as Pb−0.06%Ca−1.2%Sn anodes, where the percentage represents the mass fraction, while a stainless steel cathode was employed. Electrochemical specimens measuring 10 mm × 10 mm × 6 mm were prepared for the anodes, and they underwent polishing on a metallographic sample-making machine using sandpaper to ensure a test area of 10 mm × 10 mm and a smooth surface. The prepared anodes were then subjected to copper electrowinning experiments in electrolytes with varying Fe ion concentrations at a current density of 300 A/m2 for 48 h to observe the effect of Fe ions on the anode film layer.
The electrochemical tests were conducted using a three-electrode system, where the reference electrode was the saturated potassium sulfate electrode Hg/Hg2SO4/K2SO4 (0.645 V/MSE), the counter electrode was the platinum electrode, and the working electrode was the anode for completing the 48 h copper electrowinning experiments. All potentials in the experiments were referenced to the MSE reference electrode, and the specimens were immersed in 180 g/L H2SO4, 45 g/L Cu2+ solutions containing varying concentrations of Fe3+ ions, then electrochemically tested at a temperature of 45 °C. Each test was replicated three times to ensure stable and reliable experimental results. The error range for the three electrochemical experiments fell between 10% and 20%. However, the experimental results consistently displayed the same trend, indicating that the obtained electrochemical data were generally reliable. All electrochemical data presented in the manuscript carried an approximate error margin of 10%. Initial constant current polarization was conducted at 300 A/m2 for 30 min to ascertain the impact of impurity ions on the anode film layer. The catalytic oxygen evolution performance of the film layer was investigated through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) at the oxygen evolution potential of 1.837 V (vs. RHE). The frequency range for the scan was from 100 kHz to 1 Hz, with an AC amplitude perturbation of 5 mV. The corrosion resistance of the electrode was evaluated using potentiodynamic polarization curve testing. The scan range was set to ±400 mV relative to the open-circuit potential, with a scan rate of 5 mV/s. Finally, anodic polarization curves (LSV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were conducted from the initial potential of 0.7 V to the final potential of 2.5 V (vs. RHE) at a constant scanning rate of 5 mV/s to investigate the anodic oxygen evolution reaction and the changes in the redox process influenced by varying Fe ion concentrations.

2.3. Physical Characterization

Following the completion of the experiments, the surface morphology of the specimens was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (VEGA4, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) to explore alterations in the oxide film morphology on the anode surface influenced by varying Fe ion concentrations. Additionally, the elemental composition of different phases was analyzed using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (VEGA4, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic). The phase composition of various samples was determined through XRD analysis (D2 Phaser, Bruker, Mannheim, Germany) to investigate the impact of differing Fe ion concentrations on phase changes. XPS analysis (NexsaXPS, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was conducted to assess changes in ionic valence within the film layer, elucidating the reaction mechanism of Fe ions during copper electrowinning and clarifying modifications in the surface film layer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Changes in Electrochemical Behavior of Anode under the Effect of Fe3+

To investigate the effect of Fe3+ on the anodic performance during copper electrodeposition, experiments were conducted for 48 h in copper electrolyte solutions with varying Fe3+ concentrations. The experiments were conducted at a current density of 300 A/m2 and an electrolyte temperature of 45 °C to ensure the formation of a stable Pb−Ca−Sn anodic membrane. Electrochemical tests were conducted to examine the oxygen evolution activity, corrosion resistance, and phase changes of the anode, clarifying the effect of Fe3+ on the anode. The constant current polarization curves of the anode under different Fe3+ concentrations, as shown in Figure 1a, reflect the stability of the anode film layer formation when Fe3+ was added. With the addition of Fe3+, the anode potential rapidly decreased, showing a significant change compared to when Fe3+ was not present, indicating that Fe3+ reduced the reaction potential to some extent, thereby lowering energy consumption. When the Fe3+ concentration reached 16 g/L, a peak appeared in the curve at the beginning of the reaction, indicating that with increasing Fe3+ concentration, the initial polarization process at the anode became more complex. At this point, the surface membrane formed PbSO4 and PbO2, while Fe3+ from the electrolyte concurrently entered the anodic film in the form of Fe2O3.
The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is well represented by the LSV shown in Figure 1b. By comparing the oxygen evolution overpotential (ηOER) at a current density of 100 mA/cm2, it was observed that at a Fe3+ concentration of 2 g/L, the OER overpotential was around 848 mV, indicating good catalytic activity and reduced energy consumption. However, as the Fe3+ concentration continued to increase, the OER potential rose instead. This suggests that an excessive Fe3+ concentration alters the structure of the anode film layer, hindering the OER process and reducing the catalytic activity of the anode. The CV curves shown in Figure 1c further illustrate the impact of Fe3+ on the redox processes and catalytic activity of the anode [21]. Peak A in the oxidation curve shows changes in the oxygen evolution reaction. With the addition of Fe3+, the peak intensity initially increased and then decreased. When the Fe3+ concentration was 2 g/L, the peak intensity was highest, indicating that Fe3+ at 2 g/L enhanced the oxygen evolution catalytic activity at the anode in the electrolyte. Oxidation peak B shifted to the right, indicating that the potential required for the conversion of PbOx (0 < x < 1) to PbSO4 increased with Fe3+. This resulted in higher energy consumption and a reduced formation of PbSO4. Additionally, the intensity of the reduction peak C decreased with the addition of Fe3+, suggesting that the conversion of PbO2 in the film layer was hindered, leading to a decrease in PbO2 formation. As the Fe3+ concentration rose, the content of PbSO4 and PbO2 in the anode film layer decreased, resulting in reduced corrosion resistance and catalytic activity of the anode.
The Tafel curves acquired from electrochemical tests serve as a reference for assessing anode corrosion resistance. From these curves, anodic self-corrosion potentials and corrosion current densities under varying Fe3+ concentrations are extrapolated [22]. As shown in Figure 1d, with increasing Fe3+ concentration, the Tafel curves shifted progressively to the left and downward. The corresponding anode self-corrosion potential in Figure 1e also decreased. This indicates that higher Fe3+ concentrations resulted in a lower potential required for anode corrosion, increasing the thermodynamic tendency for corrosion. This suggests that the reduction in PbSO4 and PbO2 content in the film layer made the anode more susceptible to corrosion. Figure 1f presents the Nyquist plot for analyzing the catalytic activity of the anode during the reaction. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) reflects the extent of hindrance to the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), with an increase in Rct indicating a decrease in OER capability. At a Fe3+ concentration of 2 g/L, Rct was lower compared to when no Fe3+ is present. As the Fe3+ concentration increased further, Rct rose, indicating increased hindrance to the charge transfer process. This is attributed to the further reduction in PbO2 content in the anode film layer with higher Fe3+ concentrations, leading to a decline in anode catalytic activity. Table 1 shows that the roughness factor (RF) was related to the surface of the anode film layer, with RF being highest at a Fe3+ concentration of 2 g/L. A higher RF corresponds to a rougher anode surface, which increases the surface area available for the OER reaction and promotes its progress. This explains why the anode with 2 g/L Fe3+ exhibited better oxygen evolution activity despite the similar Rct values [23,24].

3.2. Changes in the Electrochemical Behavior of the Anode in the Presence of Fe2+ and Fe3+

To further investigate the influence of coexisting Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the electrolyte on traditional lead anodes, an electrolyte with excellent oxygen evolution activity at a Fe3+ concentration of 2 g/L was selected for further study. The Fe3+ to Fe2+ concentration ratios were controlled at 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8. As depicted in Figure 2a, for the electrolyte containing Fe3+, the addition of Fe2+ caused the constant current curve to show an initial sharp increase in potential, followed by a rapid decrease. The initial stages of polarization showed a peak in the curve attributed to the oxidation of Fe2+ at the anode during the copper electrodeposition process, impacting the initial stability of the membrane layer. After the curve stabilized, the addition of 2 g/L Fe2+ resulted in the lowest stable potential. This indicates that 2 g/L Fe2+ further reduces the reaction potential, lowering the cell voltage during the copper electrodeposition process and thus reducing energy consumption.
As shown in Figure 2b, with the addition of Fe2+, the overpotential for the oxygen evolution reaction increased as the Fe2+oncentration increased. This indicates a decrease in the catalytic activity of the anode. Under an electrolyte condition where the Fe ion concentration was Fe3+:Fe2+ = 1:1, the oxygen evolution performance of the anode improved post-electrolysis, with a decrease in the overpotential by 24 mV compared to 2 g/L Fe3+. During the copper electrodeposition process, Fe2+ and Fe3+ underwent mutual conversion in the solution, with Fe2+ being oxidized to Fe3+ at the anode. The oxidation reaction at the anode caused the conversion of Fe2+ to Fe3+, and an increase in Fe2+ content led to a corresponding increase in Fe3+. Additionally, as the electrodeposition process progressed, the PbO2 layer on the surface gradually flaked off, along with the Fe2O3 within the PbO2 layer, resulting in an increase in Fe3+ concentration in the electrolyte. The LSV curves of the anode eventually showed the same trend as when Fe3+ was added alone. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) data in Figure 2c indicate that the trend of oxidation peak A, representing the oxygen evolution reaction, is consistent with the LSV results, further confirming that the addition of 2 g/L Fe2⁺ enhances the catalytic activity of the anode. The intensity of oxidation peak B did not show a significant decrease after the addition of 2 g/L Fe2+, but decreased noticeably with higher Fe2+ concentrations. This indicates that the presence of Fe2+ did not significantly impact the conversion process of PbOx to PbSO4 within the film layer, but an increase in Fe3+ concentration obstructed this conversion. At a 2 g/L Fe2+ concentration in the electrolyte, peak C in the reduction curve showed an increase in intensity, indicating that the presence of 2 g/L Fe2+ enhanced the formation of PbO2 in the anodic film layer, thereby improving the catalytic activity of the anode. As the Fe2+ concentration further increased, the oxidation process at the anode led to an increase in Fe3+ concentration. The rise in Fe3+ concentration resulted in a decrease in PbO2 content, thereby reducing the intensity of peak C in the reduction curve.
As shown in Figure 2d,e, the self-corrosion potential increased with the addition of 2 g/L Fe2+. However, when the Fe2+ concentration was further increased to 4 g/L, the self-corrosion potential decreased sharply. The rise in PbO2 content also contributed to improved corrosion resistance. The composition ratio of Fe3+ to Fe2+ in the electrolyte can significantly affect the corrosion resistance of the anode. Comparing the self-corrosion potentials shown in Figure 2e, it can be observed that when the Fe3+:Fe2+ addition ratio was 1:1, the self-corrosion potential was highest. This indicates a lower thermodynamic tendency for corrosion at the anode, thereby improving its corrosion resistance. As the Fe2+ concentration rose, the self-corrosion potential decreased, resulting in reduced anode corrosion resistance. Figure 2f shows that the charge transfer resistance (Rct) decreased at 2 g/L Fe2+, indicating reduced hindrance to the oxygen evolution reaction of the anode and improved oxygen evolution activity. This increase in oxygen evolution activity is also attributed to the higher roughness factor (RF) shown in Table 2. The increased surface roughness enhanced the oxygen evolution activity of the anode. With 2 g/L Fe2+, the conversion of PbO2 on the anode accelerated, increasing the PbO2 content in the film layer, effectively enlarging the reaction area between the anode and the electrolyte, and enhancing the catalytic activity of the anode.

3.3. Anode Phase Change

To elucidate the physical phase composition of the anode film layer and associated changes, XRD and XPS tests were conducted on anodes that underwent 48 h copper electrowinning experiments in electrolytes with varying Fe concentrations. The XRD patterns in Figure 3a,b reveal that the anode film layer primarily consisted of PbSO4, α-PbO2, and β-PbO2. Additionally, under high Fe ion concentrations (≥8 g/L), some Fe2O3 likely existed on the anode surface, with XRD diffraction peaks displaying rightward and leftward deviation after Fe ion addition. This suggests that Fe ions likely infiltrate the surface film layer through doping during anode film formation. At an iron ion concentration of 2 g/L, compared to when Fe³⁺ ions were not added, a rightward shift in the XRD peaks could be observed. This shift is attributed to the preferential substitution and doping of iron ions, which replace lead atoms in the lattice. Due to the larger radius of Pb atoms compared to Fe atoms, this substitution reduced the lattice spacing, resulting in the rightward shift of the diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern [25]. Consequently, the addition of Fe ions reconfigured the PbO2 structure on the anodic film, enhancing anode catalytic activity [26,27,28]. With increasing Fe ion concentration, a second phase, Fe2O3, eventually formed and precipitated within the film layer. The most prominent indication is the diffraction peak near 2θ = 33.3, which shifted leftward with rising Fe ion concentration and coincided with the main peak representing Fe2O3 at a 16 g/L Fe ion concentration. After the addition of Fe3+, XRD peak heights decreased variably, indicating that Fe3+ addition inhibited the crystallinity of PbSO4 and PbO2 in the surface film layers. Conversely, Fe2+ addition caused diffraction peaks to initially increase and then decrease, altering the crystallinity of PbSO4 and PbO2. The variation in XRD diffraction peak intensity aligns with the changes observed in the CV curves. Under the influence of Fe3+, the crystallinity of PbSO4 and PbO2 decreased, which impeded the transformation of PbOx (0 < x < 1) to PbSO4 and PbO2. This reduction in the content of PbSO4 and PbO2 within the film layer led to a decline in the corrosion resistance of the anode. In contrast, when the concentration of Fe2⁺ reached 2 g/L, an increase in the crystallinity of PbSO4 and PbO2 was observed, along with an enhancement in the formation of PbO2, thereby improving the catalytic activity of the anode. Furthermore, the XPS spectrum in Figure S1 illustrates that the surface layer mainly comprised Pb, S, and O. However, there was a minor presence of Fe in the anode layer obtained from Fe-containing electrolytes. This also indicates that Fe ions entered the anode film layer through doping or oxide deposition.
The formation process of the anode film layer in the presence of Fe ions in the electrolyte is depicted in Figure 3c. Initially, a PbSO4 layer formed on the Pb-0.06%Ca-1.2%Sn anode in CuSO4 solution. Subsequently, PbSO4 continued to oxidize, transforming into a PbO2 film that covered the PbSO4 layer. Under the influence of Fe ions, some Pb atoms in the anodic PbO2 were replaced by Fe atoms. Concurrently, with increasing Fe3+ concentration, Fe2O3 became embedded in the PbO2 film layer on the anode, resulting in structural changes to the anode film.

3.4. Microscopic Morphology of Surface Film Layer

SEM and EDS analyses were performed on the surface membrane layers of the anodes obtained from the experiment to investigate the influence of iron ions. As illustrated in Figure 4, microscopic morphology changes revealed that in the absence of Fe ions, the anode surface was enveloped by crystals with regular bulk morphology. Additionally, some foam crystals were present to enhance the density of the film layer on the anode surface, and the morphology was similar to that of the Pb-Ca-Sn alloy observed after copper electrolysis experiments [29].
Specimens subjected to experiments at varying Fe ion concentrations were analyzed using EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy). The results revealed the presence of Fe elements on the surface film layer, extensively covering the crystal surface, which is consistent with the occurrence of doping reactions. This indicates that as Fe ions were introduced, Fe ions reacted on the anode surface during electrodeposition, resulting in the substitution of Pb atoms in the PbO2 crystals by Fe atoms, thereby enhancing the catalytic activity of the anode. As the Fe ion concentration increased, a transition in the state of grains on the surface film layer of the lead alloy was observed, with some regular bulk structures gradually transforming into elongated, rod-shaped crystals. This phenomenon can be attributed to the inhibitory effect of Fe3+ on the formation of PbO2 in the anode film layer. The transformation in grain morphology led to a reduction in the density of the film layer, exposing an increasing area of the lead alloy substrate, which subsequently reacted continuously with the electrolyte, intensifying corrosion. This also suggests that the corrosion resistance decreased as the Fe ion concentration increased. When Fe2+ was added, compared to the addition of Fe3+ alone, the porosity of the surface film layer is reduced, the amount of PbO2 formed increased, and the substitution of Pb atoms by Fe led to lattice expansion in PbO2, improving the density of the film layer. However, as the concentration of Fe2+ continued to rise, the appearance of elongated, rod-shaped crystals was still observed. This was due to the increased oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+, which, under the influence of Fe3+, caused the transformation in crystal morphology, thereby reducing the corrosion resistance of the anode.

3.5. Potential Mechanism of Reconstruction Engineering of Pb/Fe-PbO2

To analyze the chemical valence changes in each element on the anode surface, XPS analysis was conducted on anodes without Fe ions, with 2 g/L Fe3+, and with 2 g/L Fe2+. Figure 5a reveals that Pb was predominantly present as PbSO4 and PbOx. However, the addition of Fe3+ notably reduced the characteristic peak area representing PbOx, indicating a decrease in PbOx content in the film layer and, subsequently, a reduction in PbO2 content. On the contrary, after adding 2 g/L Fe2+, an increase in the area of PbOx was observed in the XPS spectrum of Pb. This, combined with the CV results, indicated that the presence of 2 g/L Fe2+ in the electrolyte increased the content of PbO2 to some extent. Figure 5b shows Fe predominantly appearing as Fe3+ in the anode surface film layer, with Fe2+ appearing on the anode surface upon Fe2+ addition [30,31]. Characteristic peaks of Fe2+ and Fe3+ appeared around 711.0 eV and 713.4 eV, respectively. With Fe2+ addition, the area of the XPS characteristic peaks of elemental Fe decreased, along with a decrease in Fe3+ content in the film layer. This indicated a reduction in Fe3+ incorporation into the film layer in the presence of Fe2+, thereby mitigating the effect of Fe3+ on the anode film layer. This trend is further demonstrated in Figure 5c, where the characteristic peak area located at 529 eV representing the M-O bond decreased after Fe2+ addition. This suggests that Fe2+ addition inhibited the formation of Fe-O and Pb-O bonds, reduced PbO2 content in the film layer, and diminished the likelihood of Fe3+ entering the surface film layer. Additionally, the Ov area increased after Fe2+ addition, effectively enhancing the oxygen evolution activity of the anode [32].
As depicted in Figure 5d, the presence of Fe ions in the copper electrowinning electrolyte led to the formation of a PbSO4/PbO2 structure on the anode surface. Subsequently, Fe3+ in the solution underwent substitutional doping after PbO2 formation, altering the crystal structure of PbO2, enhancing oxygen vacancy generation, and improving oxygen evolution activity. Anodic samples obtained after 48 h of electrolysis in a copper electrolyte solution, with a Fe3+ concentration of 8 g/L and under a current density of 300 A/m2 at 45 °C, revealed the presence of Fe2O3 phase in the surface membrane layer through XRD analysis. Additionally, the presence of Fe3+ in XPS confirmed that Fe ions predominantly existed in the membrane layer in the form of Fe2O3. The increase in Fe3+ concentration inhibited the formation of PbO2, leading to morphological changes in PbO2 on the film surface. This transformation resulted in the crystals being converted into elongated stripes that covered the PbSO4 layer, thereby affecting the corrosion performance of the anode and oxygen evolution reaction. The addition of 2 g/L Fe2+ altered the PbSO4/PbO2 content ratio in the anode layer, resulting in increased PbO2 content. Simultaneously, it promoted further substitutional doping of Pb atoms by Fe atoms, reduced Fe2O3 content in the film layer, and increased Fe-PbO2 content. This led to a higher presence of oxygen vacancies in the film layer, effectively enhancing catalytic activity.

3.6. Changes in Cell Voltage and Current Efficiency under the Effect of Fe Ions

A 48 h copper electrodeposition experiment was conducted to further investigate the impact of iron ions on cell voltage and current efficiency during the production process, and the obtained cell voltage and current efficiency are shown in Figure 6a,b.
After adding Fe3+, the current efficiency decreased with the increase in Fe3+ concentration. The addition of Fe2+ induced an increase in current efficiency, which was highest at a Fe2+ concentration of 2 g/L. The current efficiency of the electrowinning cell was higher than that of the electrowinning cell with the addition of Fe3+. The change in current efficiency can be attributed to the change in charge transfer resistance Rct, and an increase in Rct led to a decrease in current efficiency. The cell voltages were averaged over several tests, and the results show that the cell voltage was relatively lowest after adding 2 g/L of Fe3+ and Fe2+. The anode at this concentration had the best oxygen evolution activity, which reduced energy consumption and cost in the copper electrowinning process. As shown in Figure 6c, the addition of Fe ions favored the smoothing of the cathode copper surface to obtain smoother cathode copper, where the smoothest cathode copper was obtained by adding both 2 g/L Fe3+ and Fe2+.

4. Conclusions

The influence of Fe ions in the copper electrowinning process significantly impacted the electric chemical behavior of the anode. This study examined the effects of varying Fe ions (Fe2+ and/or Fe3+) concentrations on conventional Pb−Ca−Sn anodes. Copper electrodeposition experiments were conducted for 48 h under a current density of 300 A/m2 at 45 °C in copper electrolyte solutions with varying Fe3+ concentrations. The aim was to ensure the formation of stable membrane layers on Pb−Ca−Sn anodes. The study focused on investigating the electrochemical behavior and structural changes of these membrane layers. The results are summarized as follows:
(1)
The addition of Fe3+ inhibits the formation of PbO2 and PbSO4 in the film layer, and excessively high concentrations of Fe3+ lead to a reduction in the corrosion resistance of anode and catalytic activity. When the Fe2+ concentration is controlled around 2 g/L, the oxygen evolution catalytic activity of the anodic film layer is enhanced.
(2)
When 2 g/L of Fe2+ is present in the electrolyte, the PbO2 content in the anode film layer increases, improving both the catalytic activity and corrosion resistance of the anode. However, as the Fe2+ concentration increases, the Fe3+ concentration in the electrolyte also rises, leading to a decline in the catalytic activity of anode and corrosion resistance.
(3)
When the concentration of iron ions (Fe3+ and Fe2+) is controlled at 2 g/L, the catalytic activity of the anode is enhanced. This enhanced catalytic activity is attributed to the doping of iron ions. Substitutional doping induces changes in the PbO2 crystal structure and increases the content of oxygen vacancies in the film, thereby improving the catalytic activity of the anode.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29194578/s1, Figure S1: XPS gross spectra at different Fe ions concentrations.

Author Contributions

C.J.: investigation, conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft. Y.C. and Y.Z.: investigation, conceptualization, and data curation. B.C., J.G.: investigation, conceptualization, validation, writing—review and editing, and supervision. R.X., H.H., and Z.G.: resources, funding acquisition, validation, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 52274409, 22262017, and 51564029), Yunnan Major Scientific and Technological Projects (grant No. 202302AG050008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yingping Zhou, Buming Chen, Hui Huang and Zhongcheng Guo were employed by the company Kunming Hendera Science and Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Wei, Y.; Wang, H. Effect of Zn2+ on the extraction of copper by cyclone electrowinning from simulated copper-containing electrolyte. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 282, 120014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Felder, A.; Prengaman, R.D. Lead alloys for permanent anodes in the nonferrous metals industry. JOM 2006, 58, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cachet, C.; Pape-rérolle, C.L.; Wiart, R. Influence of Co2+ and Mn2+ ions on the kinetics of lead anodes for zinc electrowinning. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1999, 29, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mureşan, L.; Maurin, G.; Oniciu, L.; Avram, S. Effects of additives on zinc electrowinning from industrial waste products. Hydrometallurgy 1996, 40, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ivanov, I. Increased current efficiency of zinc electrowinning in the presence of metal impurities by addition of organic inhibitors. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 72, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boyanov, B.S.; Konareva, V.V.; Kolev, N.K. Purification of zinc sulfate solutions from cobalt and nickel through activated cementation. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 73, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Hong, X. The influence of nickel ions on the long period electrowinning of zinc from sulfate electrolytes. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 99, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tripathy, B.C.; Das, S.C.; Misra, V.N. Effect of antimony(III) on the electrocrystallisation of zinc from sulphate solutions containing SLS. Hydrometallurgy 2003, 69, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mirza, A. Corrosion of lead anodes in base metals electrowinning. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2016, 116, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nikoloski, A.N.; Barmi, M.J. Novel lead–cobalt composite anodes for copper electrowinning. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 137, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhong, X.; Chen, F.; Nie, H.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z. Reducing the energy consumption and cell sludge of the zinc electrowinning process by using a pyramid-shaped 3D-Pb anode. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 190, 105188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, P.; O’Keefe, T.J. Evaluation of lead anode reactions in acid sulfate electrolytes: II. Manganese reactions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, A558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, W.; Yuan, T.; Zou, L.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Li, R. Effects of Co2+ in diaphragm electrolysis on the electrochemical and corrosion behaviors of Pb Ag and Pb anodes for zinc electrowinning. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 195, 105412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McGinnity, J.J.; Nicol, M.J. The role of silver in enhancing the electrochemical activity of lead and lead–silver alloy anodes. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 144–145, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chahmana, N.; Matrakova, M.; Zerroual, L.; Pavlov, D. Influence of some metal ions on the structure and properties of doped β-PbO2. J. Power Sources 2009, 191, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chahmana, N.; Zerroual, L.; Matrakova, M. Influence of Mg2+, Al3+, Co2+, Sn2+ and Sb3+ on the electrical performance of doped β-lead dioxide. J. Power Sources 2009, 191, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.; Ge, P.; Li, Y.; Zhai, X.; Lu, K.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ge, G. Prussian blue analogues derived Fe-NiCoP reveals the cooperation of Fe doping and phosphating for enhancing OER activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 615, 156378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shaw, D.R.; Dreisinger, D.B.; Lancaster, T.; Richmond, G.D.; Tomlinson, M. The commercialization of the FENIX iron control system for purifying copper electrowinning electrolytes. JOM 2004, 56, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Z.; Li, P.; Feng, M.; Zhu, W.; Woldu, A.R.; Tong, Q.-X.; Hu, L. Unlocking Fe(III) Ions Improving Oxygen Evolution Reaction Activity and Dynamic Stability of Anodized Nickel Foam. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 15493–15502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sathiyan, K.; Mondal, T.; Mukherjee, P.; Patra, S.G.; Pitussi, I.; Kornweitz, H.; Bar-Ziv, R.; Zidki, T. Enhancing the catalytic OER performance of MoS2 via Fe and Co doping. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 16148–16155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ye, J.; Chen, B.; Guo, J.; Huang, H.; He, Y.; Wang, S. Fabrication of a highly active β-PbO2-Co3O4 electrode for zinc electrowinning by pulse electrodeposition: Characterization and catalytic performance analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 651, 159296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McCafferty, E. Validation of corrosion rates measured by the Tafel extrapolation method. Corros. Sci. 2005, 47, 3202–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, Y.; Chong, K.; Liu, C.; Cao, Y.; Wu, D. Zou Electrochemical corrosion and high temperature hot corrosion behavior of NbTaTiV and CrNbTaTiV high entropy alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 28, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, H.; Zou, S.; Chen, Y.-H.; Li, Z.; Du, C.; Li, X. Influence of carbon on the corrosion behaviour of interstitial equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys in a chlorinated concrete solution. Corros. Sci. 2020, 163, 108287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zheng, W.; Cao, Y. Doping and transformation mechanisms of Fe3+ ions in Fe-doped TiO2. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bao, H.; Qian, K.; Fang, J. Huang Fe-doped CeO2 solid solutions: Substituting-site doping versus interstitial-site doping, bulk doping versus surface doping. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 414, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rezaei, R.; Jafarzadeh, K.; Mirali, S.M.; Abbasi, H.M. A new Co-doped PbO2 anode for copper electrowinning: Electrochemical and morphological characterization. J. Energy Storage 2024, 85, 111053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, Q.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P.; Ding, J.; Cheng, W.; Huang, W. Fe doping regulates the surface reconstruction and activates lattice oxygen of NiCr LDH for water oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 483, 149383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohammadi, M.; Mohammadi, F.; Alfantazi, F. Electrochemical Reactions on Metal-Matrix Composite Anodes for Metal Electrowinning. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, E35–E43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, J.; Zhu, L.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Han, S. Lin Fe2O3 nanocatalysts on N-doped carbon nanomaterial for highly efficient electrochemical hydrogen evolution in alkaline. J. Power Sources 2019, 426, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ye, P.; Fang, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Mo, C.; Ning, J. Hu Lattice oxygen activation and local electric field enhancement by co-doping Fe and F in CoO nanoneedle arrays for industrial electrocatalytic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, F.; Duan, N.; Zuo, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, J.; Zhuang, S.; Liu, Y.; Xu, F. Fe doped γ-MnO2 of anode for lead release inhibition in zinc electrowinning. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 476, 146475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Constant current polarization curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (b) LSV curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (c) CV curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (d) Tafel curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (e) anodic self−corrosion potentials and self−corrosion current densities, (f) EIS plots at different Fe3+ concentrations.
Figure 1. (a) Constant current polarization curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (b) LSV curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (c) CV curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (d) Tafel curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (e) anodic self−corrosion potentials and self−corrosion current densities, (f) EIS plots at different Fe3+ concentrations.
Molecules 29 04578 g001
Figure 2. (a) Constant current polarization curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (b) LSV curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (c) CV curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (d) Tafel curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (e) anodic self−corrosion potentials and self−corrosion current densities, (f) EIS plots at different Fe2+ concentrations.
Figure 2. (a) Constant current polarization curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (b) LSV curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (c) CV curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (d) Tafel curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (e) anodic self−corrosion potentials and self−corrosion current densities, (f) EIS plots at different Fe2+ concentrations.
Molecules 29 04578 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (b) XRD curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (c) anodic film layer formation process in the presence of Fe ions.
Figure 3. (a) XRD curves at different Fe3+ concentrations, (b) XRD curves at different Fe2+ concentrations, (c) anodic film layer formation process in the presence of Fe ions.
Molecules 29 04578 g003
Figure 4. Surface morphology of membrane layer after constant current polarization (300 A/m2) for 48 h with different ion concentrations (a) Fe3+ 0 g/L, (b) Fe3+ 2 g/L, (c) Fe3+ 4 g/L, (d) Fe3+ 8 g/L, (e) Fe3+ 16 g/L, (f) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 0 g/L, (g) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 2 g/L, (h) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 4 g/L, (i) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 8 g/L, (j) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 16 g/L, (k) Fe3+ 16 g/L-EDS, (l) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 16 g/L-EDS.
Figure 4. Surface morphology of membrane layer after constant current polarization (300 A/m2) for 48 h with different ion concentrations (a) Fe3+ 0 g/L, (b) Fe3+ 2 g/L, (c) Fe3+ 4 g/L, (d) Fe3+ 8 g/L, (e) Fe3+ 16 g/L, (f) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 0 g/L, (g) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 2 g/L, (h) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 4 g/L, (i) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 8 g/L, (j) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 16 g/L, (k) Fe3+ 16 g/L-EDS, (l) Fe3+ 2 g/L/Fe2+ 16 g/L-EDS.
Molecules 29 04578 g004
Figure 5. (a) Elemental XPS plot of Pb, (b) elemental XPS plot of Fe, (c) elemental XPS plot of O, (d) mechanism of anode change under the influence of Fe ions.
Figure 5. (a) Elemental XPS plot of Pb, (b) elemental XPS plot of Fe, (c) elemental XPS plot of O, (d) mechanism of anode change under the influence of Fe ions.
Molecules 29 04578 g005
Figure 6. (a) Changes in cell voltage/current efficiency in the presence of Fe3+, (b) changes in cell voltage/current efficiency under the combined effect of Fe3+ and Fe2+, (c) copper cathodes with different Fe ion concentration electrolyte.
Figure 6. (a) Changes in cell voltage/current efficiency in the presence of Fe3+, (b) changes in cell voltage/current efficiency under the combined effect of Fe3+ and Fe2+, (c) copper cathodes with different Fe ion concentration electrolyte.
Molecules 29 04578 g006
Table 1. Parameters associated with the EIS fitting mapping.
Table 1. Parameters associated with the EIS fitting mapping.
Fe3+
Concentration (g/L)
Rs
Ω·cm2
Rct
Ω·cm2
Qdl
Ω−1·cm−2·sn
Cdl
μF·cm−2
nRF
00.7013.75149,1503278.9280.67163.9
20.8917.93104,50011,314.3690.80565.7
41.6018.6363,2219951.2880.84497.1
81.7333.1169,3449959.0240.80497.9
161.51144.833,9723161.0260.78158.1
Table 2. Parameters associated with the EIS fitting mapping.
Table 2. Parameters associated with the EIS fitting mapping.
Fe2+
Concentration (g/L)
Rs
Ω·cm2
Rct
Ω·cm2
Qdl
Ω−1·cm−2·sn
Cdl
μF·cm−2
nRF
02.2036.0365,2048820.0710.80441.0
23.8729.7635,76510,368.5970.89518.4
42.3353.0760,5878001.6580.83400.1
82.5895.254,9367548.6130.83377.4
165.59125.631,4706243.3030.87312.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, B.; Huang, H.; Guo, J.; Xu, R.; Guo, Z. Influence of Fe Ions on Anode Performance and the Mechanism of Action during Copper Electrowinning Process. Molecules 2024, 29, 4578. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194578

AMA Style

Jiang C, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Chen B, Huang H, Guo J, Xu R, Guo Z. Influence of Fe Ions on Anode Performance and the Mechanism of Action during Copper Electrowinning Process. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4578. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Cheng, Yiwen Chen, Yingping Zhou, Buming Chen, Hui Huang, Jun Guo, Ruidong Xu, and Zhongcheng Guo. 2024. "Influence of Fe Ions on Anode Performance and the Mechanism of Action during Copper Electrowinning Process" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4578. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194578

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop