Next Article in Journal
Application of Fuzzy Logic for Selection of Actor Nodes in WSANs —Implementation of Two Fuzzy-Based Systems and a Testbed
Next Article in Special Issue
An Optical Filter-Less CMOS Image Sensor with Differential Spectral Response Pixels for Simultaneous UV-Selective and Visible Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Risk of Falls and Dynamic Unbalance in Cerebellar Ataxia by Inertial Sensor Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leakage Current Non-Uniformity and Random Telegraph Signals in CMOS Image Sensor Floating Diffusions Used for In-Pixel Charge Storage
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A 120-ke Full-Well Capacity 160-µV/e Conversion Gain 2.8-µm Backside-Illuminated Pixel with a Lateral Overflow Integration Capacitor

Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5572; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245572
by Isao Takayanagi 1,*, Ken Miyauchi 1, Shunsuke Okura 2, Kazuya Mori 1, Junichi Nakamura 1 and Shigetoshi Sugawa 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5572; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245572
Submission received: 1 November 2019 / Revised: 11 December 2019 / Accepted: 12 December 2019 / Published: 17 December 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well written. It can be accepted after minor revision. 

(1) p. 5, line 6 

  berried --> burried ? 

(2) A possible problem of BSI for the wide dynamic range image sensor using the LOFIC technology is the parasitic sensitivity. If a very strong light is coming to the FD or SG, the high conversion gain signal may saturate or the linear response is deteriorated. A technique for suppressing parasitic sensitivity by the charge-diffusion barrier is mentioned in page 5, but the authors should discuss the problem of the parasitic LIGHT sensitivity of BSI technology. 

(3) The QE of the LOFIC pixel using the BSI technology is slightly smaller than that of the previous sensor (is it a FSI senosr?).  The physical reason why the QE of the BSI-based sensor is slightly smaller than the previous sensor should be desribed. 

Author Response

(1) p. 5, line 6 

  berried --> burried ? 

[Answer] Thank you, we will fix it

(2) A possible problem of BSI for the wide dynamic range image sensor using the LOFIC technology is the parasitic sensitivity. If a very strong light is coming to the FD or SG, the high conversion gain signal may saturate or the linear response is deteriorated. A technique for suppressing parasitic sensitivity by the charge-diffusion barrier is mentioned in page 5, but the authors should discuss the problem of the parasitic LIGHT sensitivity of BSI technology. 

[Answer] The biggest concern was actaully difference between LCG and HCG in their spectral response becasue only LCG mode has additional photo-conversion area aroudn the SG switch.  The measured spectral response didn't show significant difference, so that we concluded that contribution from the parasitic photoconversion area is little.

By the way, under very strong exposure conditions, photodiode is saturated and the overflow charge is integrated in the LOFIC capacitor anyway, then readout the overall charge after summing remaining PD charge and the LOFIC charge without loss of signal charge.  Because we just use the LCG singal for strong light, we don't have to worry about nonlinearity of the HCG mode in high light region.

(3) The QE of the LOFIC pixel using the BSI technology is slightly smaller than that of the previous sensor (is it a FSI senosr?).  The physical reason why the QE of the BSI-based sensor is slightly smaller than the previous sensor should be desribed. 

[Answer] Good question. We think this is because the microlens optimization is not good enough.  We are going to improve it in the next change.

Reviewer 2 Report

typos:

#1: lay angle => ray angle?  pg 4 2nd line from bottom, pg 7 4th line from bottom, pg 8 3rd line from top

#2: berried => buried, pg 5 6th line from top

 

Author Response

For #1

Yes, it's typo.  We will fix it.

For #2

Yes, it's also typo... We will fix it

Thank you very much

Back to TopTop