Next Article in Journal
Algal Phlorotannins as Novel Antibacterial Agents with Reference to the Antioxidant Modulation: Current Advances and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Active Targeting of P-Selectin by Fucoidan Modulates the Molecular Profiling of Metastasis in Docetaxel-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Ion2+-COS/SA Multifunctional Gel Films for Skin Wound Healing by an In Situ Spray Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Injectable Thermosensitive Chitosan-Collagen Hydrogel as A Delivery System for Marine Polysaccharide Fucoidan

Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(6), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20060402
by Julia Ohmes 1, Lena Marie Saure 2, Fabian Schütt 2, Marie Trenkel 3, Andreas Seekamp 1, Regina Scherließ 3, Rainer Adelung 2 and Sabine Fuchs 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(6), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20060402
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fucoidans: From Production to Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

According to the current research, fucoidan was encapsulated in a hydrogel composed of chitosan and collagen and used as a drug delivery system to induce bone regeneration. The authors claim that by encapsulating fucoidan, an excellent material that can induce bone regeneration and has high biocompatibility, it is possible to effectively induce bone regeneration and maintain it in the body using the phenomenon that chitosan-collagen becomes gel at body temperature. The experiments were well designed, and structural characterization and performance assessments were well performed. All of the main statements are supported by experimental analysis arguments. The work seems to be interesting and provide some new information for the development of fucoidan delivery for bone regeneration. It is acceptable after several minor issues are addressed.

 

1. In figure 6 and 7, it is better to present the survival percent of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC).

2. In line 106, 212, there are errors of numbers of minor titles.

Author Response

See attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled “Injectable Thermosensitive Chitosan-Collagen Hydrogel as a Delivery System for Marine Polysaccharide Fucoidan” by Julia Ohmes and et al. devoted to the creation of fucoidan delivery system, based on chitosan, collagen and β-glycerophosphate, investigation of its physicochemical parameters and the determination of the biocompatibility of obtained injectable thermosensitive hydrogel. This work is beneficial for researchers who focus on the investigation of fucoidans and their application.

The manuscript seems well written, and contents look important.

The part of the work devoted to the preparation and physicochemical characterization of the fucoidan delivery system represented in detail. Gelation time, gelation temperature, pH, appearance, swelling and internal microscopic structure were determined and well described.

The biocompatibility of obtained injectable thermosensitive hydrogel was assessing only by cell life/dead staining of MSC and OEC cells. To confirm the perspectiveness of the delivery system for fucoidan for the use in regenerative medicine, the additional experiments on biocompatibility of injectable thermosensitive hydrogel are needed.

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In this manuscript is described the preparation of some injectable thermosensitive chitosan-collagen hydrogels as fucoidan delivery systems.  The objectives and motivation of this study is very well defined in the introduction. The hydrogels characterization methods are adequately described. The results are clearly presented. I recommend the paper publication after minor revision following my comments. I suggest the insertion of conclusions part as a separate section. The conclusion section should summarize the results and set them into perspective to the objectives formulated in the introduction. Moreover it has to give an outlook on the importance of the findings. 

 

 

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed my questions and described further plans of biocompatibility experiments. The manuscript might be accepted in the present form.

Back to TopTop