Next Article in Journal
Central American Immigrant Parents’ Awareness, Acceptability, and Willingness to Vaccinate Their Adolescent Children Against Human Papillomavirus: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Quality of Life: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Work-Time and Leisure-Time Internet Use
Previous Article in Journal
A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial of a Novel Approach to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Care Home Residents: Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of the GET READY Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Living Fatherhood in Adults Addicted to Substances: A Qualitative Study of Fathers in Psycho-Rehabilitative Drug Addiction Treatment for Heroin and Cocaine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph17082868
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Family Environment and Tobacco Addiction: A Short Report from a Post-Graduate Teaching Hospital, India

by
Rohit Sharma
1,*,
Natália Martins
2,3,*,
Arunabh Tripathi
4,
Pasquale Caponnetto
5,6,
Neha Garg
7,
Eugenie Nepovimova
8,
Kamil Kuča
8,* and
Pradeep Kumar Prajapati
9
1
Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
3
Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4
National Institute of Indian Medical Heritage, CCRAS, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, Hyderabad, Telangana 500036, India
5
Department of Education, University of Catania, 2 Ofelia, 95124 Catania, Italy
6
Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
7
Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Ayurveda, Banaras Hindu University, 221005 Varanasi, India
8
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
9
Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, All India Institute of Ayurveda, New Delhi 110076, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(8), 2868; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082868
Submission received: 27 February 2020 / Revised: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 18 April 2020 / Published: 21 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Old and Emerging Addictions: Psychosocial Determinants, Treatments and Harm Reduction)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The initiation of tobacco addiction is complex, and several factors contribute to the onset of this behavior. It is presumed that the influence of family environment may pose a key factor in tobacco addiction. Tobacco-use has been highly observed in the Jamnagar district of Saurashtra region of Gujarat, India. No earlier study has focused on determining the pervasiveness of tobacco-use in families of tobacco users and non-users in this geographical area. Thus, this study aimed to assess the practice and pattern of tobacco-use (smoking and/or tobacco-chewing) in the families of tobacco-user patients. Methods: We studied the families of 65 tobacco-user patients (Group 1) who visited an outpatient clinic of an Ayurvedic post-graduate hospital with complaints of cough were studied and compared with age and gender-matched non-tobacco users (Group 2). The prevalence of tobacco use among the parents, siblings, and children of both groups was analyzed and compared. Results: The findings revealed that tobacco use among parents, siblings, and children in Group 1 was higher than Group 2 (p < 0.001). This meant that the problems of tobacco addiction are not always related to the individual, and therefore, tobacco-prevention strategies should focus on the entire family. Conclusions: These findings offer further insight into the promotion of smoking prevention interventions. Nevertheless, further research is warranted.

1. Introduction

Despite considerable efforts over the last decades in the fight against tobacco use, it remains the prominent cause of various preventable diseases [1,2]. Tobacco use is estimated to kill over 5 million individuals worldwide per year [3]. Moreover, the epidemic of tobacco addiction is shifting from developed to developing nations [4]. India is the second-largest consumer of tobacco which has impacted the public health significantly. India alone accounts for 1/6th of global tobacco-ailments and is likely to confront an exponential rise in tobacco-linked mortality from 1.4% (in 1990) to 13.3% (in 2020) [5].
It is imperative to determine the factors responsible for the initiation of tobacco-use to design an effective plan to control tobacco-use, thereby preventing it in the early phases. The socio-cultural factors and family environment that promote the onset of tobacco use differ from nation to nation, from developed to developing countries, region to region, and culture to culture [6]. The family has the most direct and lasting impact, not only in education and psycho-intellectual development but also in shaping values, attitudes, manners, and habits in children [7]. It is believed that tobacco intake is mostly learnt at home; and thus, effective methods for tobacco control should first target the home environment. However, a multidimensional approach should still be used in tobacco use intervention. For instance, tobacco consumption has been highly observed in the Jamnagar district of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat, India. An earlier prevalence study conducted at Jamnagar found that among tobacco users, consumption was spread as follows: only tobacco chewing: 66.2%, only smoking: 14.6%, and both smoking and tobacco chewing: 19.2% [8]. Another study found that every four out of ten residents were exposed to chewing tobacco. Around 63.9% of current tobacco chewers and 48.2% of quitters had a history of another family member consuming tobacco in some form [9]. However, no report on the role of the family environment on tobacco addiction in this geographical area is available so far. Therefore, we have attempted to determine the practice and pattern of tobacco consumption in families of tobacco users and non-users. We also look at the impact on tobacco use among siblings and children of tobacco users and non-users in this geographical area.

2. Materials and Methods

In India (the Jamnagar region specifically), there are myriad forms of tobacco-usage: in smoked and smokeless forms. For smoking, Bidi/Beedi (an indigenous form of thin handmade cigarette or mini-cigar) is used more commonly in India than conventional cigarettes. Bidi is prepared by rolling dried Tendu or Temburni leaf (Diospyros melanoxylon) with 0.15–0.25 g of sun-dried, flaked tobacco stuffed into a conical shape, and the roll is tied with a thread. Smokeless forms of tobacco-usage include oral or nasal application, where tobacco-chewing is common in forms of gutkha, khaini, or pan masala (prepared in various forms by crushed betel nut, tobacco, catechu, lime, and sweet or savory additives).
A cross-sectional study was performed in an outpatient clinic of the Ayurvedic post-graduate teaching and research hospital at Jamnagar, India. The study commenced on August 7, 2014, and included new patients that regularly visited the outpatient clinic with complaints of cough and with a history of tobacco-usage. Sixty-five patients over the next ten months were enrolled up to May 7, 2015. Informed consent was obtained as per the Helsinki declaration after offering appropriate explanations about the study and its aims. A single examiner collected the required information in the local language. The patients with a history of tobacco use were registered in Group 1. The prevalence of tobacco use among the parents, siblings, and children was noted by forming a pedigree profile of these patients. Another 65 age and gender-matched individuals that did not use tobacco in any form were enrolled in Group 2. The tobacco non-users were the individuals who had never used any form of tobacco chewing or smoking. These tobacco non-users included healthy relatives of patients visiting the outpatient’s department and the hospital staff. Healthy controls are relatives of tobacco-user cases, so it is clear that the control belongs to same characteristics as the cases [10]. In a developing country like India, relatives have the same ethnic and socio-economic conditions. They were assessed for a history of tobacco use in the family by creating pedigree profiles for these individuals. The pedigree profile provides comprehensive evidence on smoking, psycho-social factors (conflicts in the family/stress), family history of cardiovascular ailments, hypertension, and diabetes. Pedigree assessment can provide leads for early lifestyle intervention in young asymptomatic siblings [11]. The data were presented numerically (%). The prevalence of tobacco use by the blood relatives of subjects between both groups was compared using the Chi-square/Fisher exact test and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The sample size for each cell in comparison to Group 1 was very low, so using the odds ratio was not valid [12]. The significance level was set at 5%.

3. Results

There were 65 tobacco-user patients in Group 1, and 65 age and gender-matched healthy controls in Group 2. The average age was 38.6 ± 11.7 years. There were 49 males (75%) and 16 females (25%) in Group 1, and 49 males (75%) and 16 females (25%) in Group 2. Baseline characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Socio and demographic background did not differ between both groups.
In 15 tobacco-users in Group 1, both mother and father were tobacco users. Here, 56 tobacco-user patients (86.2%) had fathers with a history of tobacco use and 16 patients (24.6%) had mothers with a history of tobacco use. In contrast, among tobacco non-users, only two participants (3.1%) had fathers with a history of tobacco use, and none (0%) had mothers with a history of tobacco use. Hence the habit of tobacco-use among parents in Group 1 was higher than in Group 2 (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
The siblings of the 49 patients (75.4%) in Group 1 used tobacco in different forms compared to only one (1.5%) in Group 2. Furthermore, 15 children (23.1%) of patients in Group 1 had the habit of tobacco use compared to none (0%) in Group 2. Comparatively higher tobacco consumption was observed in multiple forms among children and siblings of Group 1 patients than Group 2 patients (p < 0.001). Table 2 shows the practice and patterns of tobacco use among both groups.
In tobacco-user patients in Group 1, 28 (43.1%) patients used bidi, 14 (21.5%) used gutkha, 15 (23.1%) consumed tobacco orally in other forms, 8 (12.3%) used cigarettes, and 11 (16.9%) were users of poly-tobaccos.

4. Discussion

It is evident from the present report that tobacco addiction was prevalent among members of tobacco-user families as compared to those of tobacco non-user families. These findings support and validate recent reports, accentuating the influence of tobacco-use in the family on developing this habit. Substantial evidence proves that children with tobacco addicted parents and siblings are at a higher risk of becoming addicted due to genetic and family environmental factors [13,14,15,16,17,18]. A young adolescent who perceives that his/her parents are permissive on the use of drugs is more likely to start an addiction to substances such as tobacco or alcohol [19]. Moreover, parents addicted to smoking are more likely to grant easy access to cigarettes and have a lesser likelihood to oppose their children’s smoking. Indeed, a study explained that tobacco addiction appears to “run in the family” and the children who grow up in families with habits of tobacco usage may duplicate it in their adult behavior based on what they have observed and learnt from their family experience. Factors such as gender, ethnicity, development stage, and social environment may also affect the risk of addiction. Thus, nature and nurture, both impact an individual’s vulnerability or resistance to such drug addictions [20]. These days, family structures have turned to be more complex, witnessing a shift from the traditional nuclear family to single-parent families, stepfamilies, foster families, and multi-generational families. Thus, when a family member starts using tobacco in any form, the whole family is affected, and such an effect may vary with the family structure. In the present study, among tobacco users, 86.2% of individuals had a father with a tobacco using history. This finding agrees with a previous report showing the considerable influence of the smoking habit of a father on the current smoking habits of his child [16]. Moreover, our study found that among tobacco users, a considerable number of individuals had a mother with a tobacco using history. Over half a million infants annually are prenatally exposed to maternal smoking. Experts have affirmed that babies born to mothers who smoked when pregnant have an increased risk of nicotine addiction and a higher chance of smoking behavior in adulthood. There is a 5-fold heightened risk of adolescent drug addiction (early tobacco experimentation or nicotine dependence) in children exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy [21,22,23,24]. The existing theory for hiked nicotine dependence in offspring of smoker mothers’ states that nicotine crosses the placental barrier, enters the bloodstream of the developing baby (thus, inducing passive nicotine inhalation), and interacts with the genomes that govern cell differentiation, permanently altering cells’ responsiveness in such a manner that increases susceptibility to tobacco addiction [25,26]. Prenatal exposure to nicotine may result in behavioral and neural consequences, and the brain of the fetus gets primed for nicotine craving, leading to substance use (particularly smoking) in adolescence [27,28,29]. In the present report, among tobacco-users, 75.4% of individuals had a history of tobacco-user sibling(s). Our findings corroborate a recent study wherein the smoking behavior of siblings showed important influences on children’s cognitive susceptibility toward smoking addiction [30].
Our findings also revealed that a paternal smoking history was commonly observed in cases of male smokers and more maternal smoking patterns in female smokers. Research evidence also suggests that gender differences also affect the influence of family/social factors on smoking uptake in children [31,32]. For instance, differential effects are reported according to gender (with a stronger effect of father’s smoking on boys and stronger influence of mother’s smoking on girls), developmental period (with a stronger effect of parental smoking before age 13 than afterwards), and residence of parents (with the effects of father’s smoking being dependent on living in the same household as the adolescent) [31,33].
The immature mind of a child learns from what s/he sees in their surroundings, and they follow the path of what the elders do and acquire their habits accordingly. The family and elder siblings have the first, most direct and lasting impact on shaping the behavior, manners, and habits of kids. If the kids see their elder smoke/chew tobacco, they become curious and seek to imitate and tend to initiate this habit at a very young age [34]. Social learning theory suggests that learning (of an attitude or habit) occurs through or from observing others smoking and is gender-specific [35,36], i.e., the son normally copies the father’s conduct or actions. At the same time, daughters tend to copy their mothers. This phenomenon may be observed in smoking, as indicated by the significant association stated between the father and adolescent smoking. In concordance with ‘social learning theory’, earlier reports have consistently revealed that smoking addiction in parents and siblings are the substantial risk factors for smoking initiation [37,38,39,40]. Smoking in parents is also linked to the sensed safety of casual smoking and temptation toward smoke in response to smoking-related prompts, for instance, seeing someone smoke [41,42]. These problems can be generally observed in nuclear families due to ineffectual nurture, abuse, or neglect as they turn out to be emotionally sensitive. Such factors can increase vulnerability and may lead to dependency on tobacco-based products or any other addictive behavior. The investigators estimated a 32% likelihood of influence of parental smoking on their child to try smoking and a 28% chance that parental smoking influenced their child to switch the smoking habit from a monthly to daily basis [43]. Figure 1 shows the proposed understanding of family influence and intergenerational transmission of tobacco addiction behavior. Thus, smoking in the family environment seems to be a significant source of vulnerability to smoking uptake among young adolescents, and parental or sibling smoking cessation might reduce the chance of susceptibility.
Extensive evidence indicates that tobacco addiction is closely and independently associated with common mental illness, like depression, anxiety, and stress. Individuals with such psychiatric disorders have been found to smoke at higher rates, smoke more cigarettes per day, smoke for longer, and have greater difficulty quitting, compared to all other smokers. This makes it imperative to manage addictions and psychological morbidities together and not independently. High comorbidity between tobacco-use (smoking and/or tobacco-chewing) and psychiatric illnesses has been extensively reported in past decades [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Thus, investigating this association was out of the scope of the present study and was excluded. Among social factors, peer influence also plays a significant role to encourage or deter tobacco addiction behavior in adolescents [51,52,53]. As the present study was focused on understanding the role of the family environment on tobacco-use, identifying peer group influences was excluded in this report.
As the main limitations of this study, we highlight the small sample size and the fact that the investigation only comprised of family history from patients and did not include healthy smokers. However, in this study, we found that the tobacco-use habit is not merely an individual phenomenon, but rather it has a familial occurrence. Thus, healthcare methodologies aiming families, on the whole, will tend to be more effectual while formulating plans to control tobacco use. Moreover, families should be involved in prevention programs. Investigations show that parental censure toward smoking lessens the vulnerability of an adolescent to take up smoking [54,55]. Family and community-level intervention efforts should target reinforcing parental and older siblings’ disapproval of smoking and weaken probable intergenerational influences (Figure 2). Parents or other adult family members need to do the right thing by setting good examples [56].
Moreover, parents with low educational levels should be targeted by disseminating messages appropriate to their social setting, literacy, and understanding level via anti-smoking drives or programs [57]. Thus, the following recommendations should be considered as part of a general intervention model: (a) Policy-level methods: increased taxes or levies on tobacco-based products, stringent smoke-free laws in public/workplaces, health warnings on tobacco products, prohibiting of tobacco advertising, promotions and sponsorships (in print and electronic media, especially movies), and curbing access to minors. (b) Community-level methods: school-based health awareness programs, youth advocacy and empowerment, tobacco-free homes (peer and family support), and mass media campaigns. (c) Individual-level approaches: counseling to promote cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, and pharmacological therapy [58,59,60,61,62].

5. Conclusions

The present study affirms that in families of tobacco-user cough patients, tobacco consumption by parents and siblings is higher as compared to families of non-tobacco users. A higher prevalence of tobacco-use amongst children of tobacco-consuming families was observed compared to non-user families. Family environment factors were found to be linked significantly with one’s cognitive susceptibility toward smoking, with the smoking behavior of parents and siblings being identified as vital influencing factors. Moreover, while some gender-based differential findings were found. However, these may not be adequate to warrant separate intervention approaches. Large-scale, well-executed studies involving different ethnic groups and covering larger population and geographical areas should be undertaken. The present findings offer further insight into the development of effective smoking prevention interventions; nevertheless, further research is still required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data collection and writing-original manuscript, R.S.; Editing and proofreading, N.M., A.T., P.C., N.G., E.N., K.K., and P.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the UHK Excellence project. It was supported by University of Hradec Kralove (Faculty of Science, VT2019–2021) [Kamil Kuca, Eugenie Nepovimova].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gavin, A. Smoking is a major cause of premature death worldwide. Evid. Based Health Care 2004, 8, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. The Millennium Development Goals and Tobacco Control; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tachfouti, N.; Raherison, C.; Obtel, M.; Nejjari, C. Mortality attribute to tobacco: Review of different methods. Arch. Pub. Health 2014, 72, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ezzati, M.; Lopez, A.D. Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 2003, 362, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reddy, K.S.; Gupta, P.C. Report on Tobacco Control in India; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi, India, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiloha, R.C. Social and Cultural Aspects of Drug Abuse in Adolescents. Delhi Psychiatry J. 2009, 12, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Naomee, I. Role of families on early childhood development and education: Dhaka city perspective. Int. J. Social Sci. 2013, 11, 158–164. [Google Scholar]
  8. Makwana, N.R.; Shah, V.R.; Yadav, S. A study on prevalence of smoking and tobacco chewing among adolescents in rural areas of Jamnagar district, Gujarat state. J. Med. Sci. Res. 2007, 1, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  9. Joshi, U.; Modi, B.; Yadav, S. A study on prevalence of chewing form of tobacco and existing quitting patterns in urban population of Jamnagar, Gujarat. Indian J. Community Med. 2010, 35, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhong, C.; Cockburn, M.; Cozen, W.; Voutsinas, J.; Lacey, J.V., Jr.; Luo, J.; Sullivan-Halley, J.; Bernstein, L.; Wang, S.S. Evaluating the use of friend or family controls in epidemiologic case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dwivedi, S.; Aggarwal, A. Pedigree Profile: A valuable tool in the risk assessment of coronary artery disease in young. South East Asian J. Prev. Cardiol. 2008, 12, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tripathi, A.; Trigulla, S.R. Illusion of the “p-value” theory in Ayurveda research: A need for perceptible alternative. AYU 2019, 40, 134–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. D’Souza, G.; Rekha, D.P.; Sreedaran, P.; Srinivasan, K.; Mony, P.K. Clinico-epidemiological profile of tobacco users attending a tobacco cessation clinic in a teaching hospital in Bangalore city. Lung India 2012, 29, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Osler, M.; Holst, C.; Prescott, E.; Sørensen, T.I. Influence of genes and family environment on adult smoking behavior assessed in an adoption study. Genet. Epidemiol. 2001, 21, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dwivedi, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Singh, N.; Aggarwal, S.; Sharma, V. Role of family milieu in tobacco addiction: A study in a tertiary-care institution in India. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2013, 31, 130–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Shamsuddin, K.; Haris, M.A. Family influence on current smoking habits among secondary school children in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Singap. Med. J. 2000, 41, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fawzy, F.I.; Coombs, R.H.; Gerber, B. Generational continuity in the use of substances: The impact of parental substance use on adolescent substance use. Addict. Behav. 1983, 8, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scragg, R.; Laugesen, M.; Robinson, E. Parental smoking and related behaviours influence adolescent tobacco smoking: Results from the 2001 New Zealand national survey of 4th form students. N. Z. Med. J. 2003, 116, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  19. McDermott, D. The relationship of parental drug use and parents’ attitude concerning adolescent drug use to adolescent drug use. Adolescence 1984, 19, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ICF International. Protecting Children in Families Affected by Substance Use Disorders; Child Abuse and Neglect User Manual Series; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ICF International: Fairfax, VA, USA, 2009. Available online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/substanceuse.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2019).
  21. Knopik, V.S. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child outcomes: Real or spurious effect? Dev. Neuropsychol. 2009, 34, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lieb, R.; Schreier, A.; Pfister, H.; Wittchen, H.U. Maternal Smoking and Smoking in Adolescents: A prospective community study of adolescents and their mothers. Eur. Addict. Res. 2003, 9, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Weissman, M.M.; Warner, V.; Wickramaratne, P.J.; Kandel, D.B. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and psychopathology in offspring followed to adulthood. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1999, 38, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cornelius, M.D.; Leech, S.L.; Goldschmidt, L.; Day, N.L. Prenatal tobacco exposure: Is it a risk factor for early tobacco experimentation? Nicotine Tob. Res. 2000, 2, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Buka, S.L.; Shenassa, E.D.; Niaura, R. Elevated risk of tobacco dependence among offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy: A 30-year prospective study. Am. J. Psychiatry 2003, 160, 1978–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Rama Sastry, B.V.; Hemontolor, M.E.; Olenick, M. Prostaglandin E2 in human placenta: Its vascular effects and activation of prostaglandin E2 formation by nicotine and cotinine. Pharmacology 1999, 58, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ernst, M.; Moolchan, E.T.; Robinson, M.L. Behavioral and neural consequences of prenatal exposure to nicotine. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2001, 40, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Abreu-Villaça, Y.; Seidler, F.J.; Tate, C.A.; Cousins, M.M.; Slotkin, T.A. Prenatal nicotine exposure alters the response to nicotine administration in adolescence: Effects on cholinergic systems during exposure and withdrawal. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. O’Callaghan, F.V.; O’Callaghan, M.; Najman, J.M.; Williams, G.M.; Bor, W.; Alati, R. Prediction of adolescent smoking from family and social risk factors at 5 years, and maternal smoking in pregnancy and at 5 and 14 years. Addiction 2006, 101, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. McGee, C.E.; Trigwell, J.; Fairclough, S.J.; Murphy, R.C.; Porcellato, L.; Ussher, M.; Foweather, L. Influence of family and friend smoking on intentions to smoke and smoking-related attitudes and refusal self-efficacy among 9-10-year-old children from deprived neighbourhoods: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sullivan, K.M.; Bottorff, J.; Reid, C. Does mother’s smoking influence girls’ smoking more than boys’ smoking? A 20-year review of the literature using a sex-and gender-based analysis. Subst. Use Misuse 2011, 46, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Huh, J.; Pentz, M.A.; Chou, C.P. Changes in friends and parental influences on cigarette smoking from early through late adolescence. J. Adolesc. Health 2013, 53, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gilman, S.E.; Rende, R.; Boergers, J.; Abrams, D.B.; Buka, S.L.; Clark, MA.; Colby, S.M.; Hitsman, B.; Kazura, A.N.; Lipsitt, L.P.; et al. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: An intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Paediatrics 2009, 123, e274–e281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Emmanuel, S.C.; Ho, C.K.; Chen, A.J. Cigarette smoking among school children in Singapore. Part II--Development of the smoking habit. Singap. Med. J. 1991, 32, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vuolo, M.; Staff, J. Parent and Child Cigarette Use: A Longitudinal, Multigenerational Study. Pediatrics 2013, 132, e568–e577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Leonardi-Bee, J.; Britton, J.M.L. Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2011, 66, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wen, X.Z.; Chen, W.Q.; Muscat, J.E.; Qian, Z.; Lu, C.; Zhang, C.; Luo, Y.; Liang, C.; Han, K.; Deng, X.; et al. Modifiable family and school factors associated with smoking status among adolescents in Guangzhou, China. Prev. Med. 2007, 45, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shakib, S.; Hong, Z.; Johnson, C.A.; Chen, X.G.; Ping, S.; Palmer, P.H. Family characteristics and smoking among urban and rural adolescents living in China. Prev. Med. 2005, 40, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Schuck, K.; Otten, R.; Engels, R.; Kleinjan, M. The role of environmental smoking in smoking-related cognitions and susceptibility to smoking in never-smoking 9-12-year-old children. Addict. Behav. 2012, 37, 1400–14065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Andrews, J.A.; Greenwald, A.G.; Gordon, J.; Widdop, C. Using the implicit association test to assess children’s implicit attitudes toward smoking. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 40, 2387–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bricker, J.B.; Peterson, A.V., Jr.; Leroux, B.G.; An dersen, M.R.; Rajan, K.B.; Sarason, I.G. Prospective prediction of children’s smoking transitions: Role of parents’ and older siblings’ smoking. Addiction 2005, 101, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fluharty, M.; Taylor, A.E.; Grabski, M.; Munafo, M.R. The Association of Cigarette Smoking with Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2017, 19, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leventhal, A.M.; Zvolensky, M.J. Anxiety, depression, and cigarette smoking: A transdiagnostic vulnerability framework to understanding emotion-smoking comorbidity. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 141, 176–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shaikh, B.M.; Doke, P.P.; Gothankar, J.S. Depression, anxiety, stress, and stressors among rural adolescents studying in Pune and a rural block of Nanded district of Maharashtra, India. Indian J. Public Health 2018, 62, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ho, C.S.H.; Tan, E.L.Y.; Ho, R.C.M.; Chiu, M.Y.L. Relationship of anxiety and depression with respiratory symptoms: Comparison between depressed and non-depressed smokers in Singapore. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Davison, K.M.; Lin, S.L.; Tong, H.; Kobayashi, K.M.; Mora-Almanza, J.G.; Fuller-Thomson, E. Nutritional Factors, Physical Health and Immigrant Status Are Associated with Anxiety Disorders among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Findings from Baseline Data of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 17, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Assari, S.; Smith, J.; Mistry, R.; Farokhnia, M.; Bazargan, M. Substance Use among Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults; Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Assari, S.; Smith, J.L.; Zimmerman, M.A.; Bazargan, M. Cigarette Smoking among Economically Disadvantaged African-American Older Adults in South Los Angeles: Gender Differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mak, Y.W.; Leung, D.; Loke, A.Y. The vulnerability to alcohol, tobacco, and drug use of adolescents in Hong Kong: A phenomenological study. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van den Brand, F.; Nagtzaam, P.; Nagelhout, G.; Winkens, B.; van Schayck, C.P. The association of peer smoking behavior and social support with quit success in employees who participate in smoking cessation interventions in the workplace. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Leshargie, C.T.; Alebel, A.; Kibret, G.D.; Birhanu, M.Y.; Mulugeta, H.; Malloy, P.; Wagnew, F.; Ewunetie, A.A.; Ketema, D.B.; Aderaw, A.; et al. The impact of peer pressure on cigarette smoking among high school and university students in Ethiopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eiser, J.R.; Morgan, M.; Gammage, P.; Gray, E. Adolescent Smoking: Attitude, norms and parental influence. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 28, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Farkas, A.J.; Distefan, J.M.; Choi, W.S.; Gilpin, E.A.; Pierce, J.P. Does Parental Smoking Cessation Discourage Adolescent Smoking? Prev. Med. 1999, 28, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lim, K.H.; Sumarni, M.G.; Kee, C.C.; Norhamimah, A.; Wan Rozita, W.M.; Amal, N.M. Prevalence, smoking habit and factors related to smoking and nicotine addiction among lower secondary school male students in Kota Tinggi district, Johor, Malaysia. Malays. J. Pub. Health Med. 2010, 10, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kovess, V.; Pilowsky, D.J.; Boyd, A.; Pez, O.; Bitfoi, A.; Carta, M.; Eke, C.; Golitz, D.; Kuijpers, R.; Lesinskiene, S.; et al. Parental Smoking in the Vicinity of Children and Tobacco Control Policies in the European Region. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Arora, M.; Mathur, M.R.; Singh, N. A Framework to Prevent and Control Tobacco among Adolescents and Children: Introducing the IMPACT Model. Indian J. Pediatr. 2013, 80, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Arora, M.; Nazar, G.P. Prohibiting tobacco advertising, promotions & sponsorships: Tobacco control best buy. Indian J. Med. Res. 2013, 137, 867–870. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sharma, R.; Kabra, A.; Rao, M.M.; Prajapati, P.K. Herbal and Holistic solutions for Neurodegenerative and Depressive disorders: Leads from Ayurveda. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 2597–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sharma, R.; Kuca, K.; Nepovimova, E.; Kabra, A.; Rao, M.M.; Prajapati, P.K. Traditional Ayurvedic and herbal remedies for Alzheimer’s disease: From bench to bedside. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2019, 19, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharma, R.; Martins, N.; Kuca, K.; Chaudhary, A.; Kabra, A.; Rao, M.M.; Prajapati, P.K. Chyawanprash: A Traditional Indian Bioactive Health Supplement. Biomolecules 2019, 26, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 02868 g001 550
Figure 1. Family influence and intergenerational transmission of tobacco addiction behavior.
Figure 1. Family influence and intergenerational transmission of tobacco addiction behavior.
Ijerph 17 02868 g001
Ijerph 17 02868 g002 550
Figure 2. Family and community-level solutions to curb tobacco addiction.
Figure 2. Family and community-level solutions to curb tobacco addiction.
Ijerph 17 02868 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
CharactersCategoriesGroup 1 (n = 65)Group 2 (n = 65)
N%N%p Value
Age (years)31–404163.074163.07-
41–502233.842233.84
51–600203.070203.07
GenderMale4975.384975.38-
Female1624.621624.62
EducationUneducated0812.300609.230.80
Primary education1523.071218.46
Secondary1929.232335.38
Higher secondary1116.921218.46
Graduation/Post-graduation1218.461218.46
ReligionHindu4264.613350.760.14
Islamic1218.461827.69
Jain0507.691116.92
Others (Christian, Sikh etc.)0609.230304.61
Marital statusMarried6396.926193.840.40
Unmarried/Widowed/ Separated0203.070406.15
OccupationBusiness3147.693350.760.64
Govt. Employee1116.921523.07
Farmer and laborer1827.691421.53
Others0507.690304.61
Socio-economic statusLower1421.531726.150.81
Middle3350.763249.23
Upper 1827.691624.62
HabitatUrban5889.236092.300.54
Rural0710.770507.70
Table
Table 2. Tobacco usage among family members.
Table 2. Tobacco usage among family members.
ParametersGroup 1 (n = 65)Group 2 (n = 65)p Value
Individuals having tobacco-user father, n (%)56 (86.2)2 (3.1)<0.001
Individuals having tobacco-user mother, n (%)16 (24.6)0(0.0)<0.001
Individuals having tobacco-user sibling(s), n (%)49 (75.4)1 (1.5)<0.001
Bold: p < 0.001.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, R.; Martins, N.; Tripathi, A.; Caponnetto, P.; Garg, N.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuča, K.; Prajapati, P.K. Influence of Family Environment and Tobacco Addiction: A Short Report from a Post-Graduate Teaching Hospital, India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082868

AMA Style

Sharma R, Martins N, Tripathi A, Caponnetto P, Garg N, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Prajapati PK. Influence of Family Environment and Tobacco Addiction: A Short Report from a Post-Graduate Teaching Hospital, India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(8):2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Rohit, Natália Martins, Arunabh Tripathi, Pasquale Caponnetto, Neha Garg, Eugenie Nepovimova, Kamil Kuča, and Pradeep Kumar Prajapati. 2020. "Influence of Family Environment and Tobacco Addiction: A Short Report from a Post-Graduate Teaching Hospital, India" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 8: 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop