Correlation between MOVA3D, a Monocular Movement Analysis System, and Qualisys Track Manager (QTM) during Lower Limb Movements in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. MOVA3D System
2.2. Subjects and Experimental Design
Experimental Setup and Data Collection
2.3. Data Processing
2.4. Correlation of the MOVA3D System with Gold-Standard Measure
3. Results
4. Discussion
Limitation
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zampolini, M.; Todeschini, E.; Hermens, H.; Ilsbroukx, S.; Macellari, V.; Magni, R.; Rogante, M.; Scattareggia Marchese, S.; Vollenbroek, M.; Giacomozzi, C. Tele-rehabilitation: Present and future. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2008, 44, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
- Brennan, D.M.; Mawson, S.; Brownsell, S. Telerehabilitation: Enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 145, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dinesen, B.; Haesum, L.K.; Soerensen, N.; Nielsen, C.; Grann, O.; Hejlesen, O.; Toft, E.; Ehlers, L. Using preventive home monitoring to reduce hospital admission rates and reduce costs: A case study of telehealth among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. J. Telemed. Telecare 2012, 18, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tousignant, M.; Moffet, H.; Boissy, P.; Corriveau, H.; Cabana, F.; Marquis, F. A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J. Telemed. Telecare 2011, 17, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cason, J. A pilot telerehabilitation program: Delivering early intervention services to rural families. Int. J. Telerehabil. 2009, 1, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weiss, P.L.; Sveistrup, H.; Rand, D.; Kizony, R. Video capture virtual reality: A decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Phys. Ther. Rev. 2009, 14, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frederix, I.; Hansen, D.; Coninx, K.; Vandervoort, P.; Vandijck, D.; Hens, N.; Van Craenenbroeck, E.; Van Driessche, N.; Dendale, P. Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: A costeffectiveness analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016, 23, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, T.B.F.; Bezerra, D.A.; de Silva, J.P.; Cacho, Ê.W.A.; de Souza, C.G.; Cacho, R.O. The Implementation of Teleconsultations in a Physiotherapy Service During Covid-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Case Report. Int. J. Telerehabil. 2021, 22, e6368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bidargaddi, N.; Sarela, A. Activity and heart rate-based measures for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Methods Inf. Med. 2008, 47, 208–216. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, Y.J.; Yin, Y.H.; Xu, L.D.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, F. IoT-Based Smart Rehabilitation System. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar]
- Hamida, S.T.B.; Hamida, E.B.; Ahmed, B. A new mHealth communication framework for use in wearable WBANs and mobile technologies. Sensors 2015, 15, 3379–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rolim, C.O.; Koch, F.L.; Westphall, C.B.; Werner, J.; Fracalossi, A.; Salvador, G.S. A Cloud Computing Solution for Patient’s Data Collection in Health Care Institutions. In Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, Saint Maarten, The Netherlands, 10–16 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Benharref, A.; Serhani, M.A. Novel Cloud and SOA-Based Framework for E-Health Monitoring Using Wireless Biosensors. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2014, 18, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breedon, P.; Byrom, B.; Siena, L.; Muehlhausen, W. Enhancing the Measurement of Clinical Outcomes Using Microsoft Kinect. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Interactive Technologies and Games (ITAG), Notthingham, UK, 26–27 October 2016; pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar]
- Llorens, R.; Gil-Gomez, J.A.; Mesa-Gresa, P.; Alcaniz, M.; Colomer, C.; Noe, E. BioTrak: A comprehensive overview. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), Zurich, Switzerland, 27–29 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Spina, G.; Huang, G.; Vaes, A.; Spruit, M.; Amft, O. COPDTrainer: A smartphone-based motion rehabilitation training system with real-time acoustic feedback. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Zurich, Switzerland, 9–12 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Giorgino, T.; Tormene, P.; Maggioni, G.; Pistarini, C.; Quaglini, S. Wireless Support to Poststroke Rehabilitation: MyHeart’s Neurological Rehabilitation Concept. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2009, 13, 1012–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holden, M.K.; Dyar, T.A.; Dayan-Cimadoro, L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2007, 15, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saracino, L.; Avizzano, C.A.; Ruffalde, E.; Cappiello, G.; Curto, Z.; Scoglio, A. Motore++ A portable haptic device for domestic rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy, 23–26 October 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Díaz, I.; Catalan, J.M.; Badesa, F.J.; Justo, X.; Lledo, L.D.; Ugartemendia, A.; Gil, J.J.; García-Aracil, N. Development of a robotic device for post-stroke home tele-rehabilitation. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10, 1687814017752302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, J.; Song, A.; Xu, B.; Nie, J.; Li, H. A Novel Human-Robot Cooperative Method for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2017, 9, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganguly, A.; Rashidi, G.; Mombaur, K. Comparison of the Performance of the Leap Motion ControllerTM with a Standard Marker-Based Motion Capture System. Sensors 2021, 3, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, B.; Seyres, M.; Philp, F.; Chadwick, E.K.; Blana, D. Healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture: A scoping review. PeerJ 2022, 26, 13517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regazzoni, D.; de Vecchi, G.; Rizzi, C. RGB cams vs RGB-D sensors: Low cost motion capture technologies performances and limitations. J. Manuf. Syst. 2014, 33, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, I.F. Uso de Ressoadores de Anéis Fendidos e Ressoadores de Anéis Fendidos Complementares Para o Melhoramento do Desempenho em Filtros Passa-Baixa em Microfita. Ph.D. Thesis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tomescu, S.S.; Bakker, R.; Beach, T.A.C.; Chandrashekar, N. The Effects of Filter Cutoff Frequency on Musculoskeletal Simulations of High-Impact Movements. J. Appl. Biomech. 2018, 34, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mai, P.; Willwacher, S. Effects of low-pass filter combinations on lower extremity joint moments in distance running. J. Biomech. 2019, 95, 109311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, I.C.M. Avaliação Biomecânica do Movimento Humano. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rocha, A.P.; Choupina, H.M.P.; Vilas-Boas, M.D.C.; Fernandes, J.M.; Cunha, J.P.S. System for automatic gait analysis based on a single RGB-D camera. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 0201728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.; Siegler, S.; Allard, P.; Kirtley, C.; Leardini, A.; Rosenbaum, D.; Whittle, M.; D’Lima, D.D.; Cristofolini, L.; Witte, H.; et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. J. Biomech. 2002, 35, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portney, L.G.; Watkins, M.P. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wochatz, M.; Tilgner, N.; Mueller, S.; Rabe, S.; Eichler, S.; John, M.; Völler, H.; Mayer, F. Reliability and validity of the Kinect V2 for the assessment of lower extremity rehabilitation exercises. Gait Posture 2019, 70, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geelen, J.E.; Branco, M.P.; Ramsey, N.F.; Van Der Helm, F.C.; Mugge, W.; Schouten, A.C. MarkerLess Motion Capture: ML-MoCap, a low-cost modular multi-camera setup. In Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Virtual Conference, 1–5 November 2021; pp. 4859–4862. [Google Scholar]
- Schmitz, A.; Ye, M.; Boggess, G.; Shapiro, R.; Yang, R.; Noehren, B. The measurement of in vivo joint angles during a squat using a single camera markerless motion capture system as compared to a marker-based system. Gait Posture 2015, 41, 694–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mentiplay, B.F.; Hasanki, K.; Perraton, L.G.; Pua, Y.H.; Charlton, P.C.; Clark, R.A. Three-dimensional assessment of squats and drop jumps using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Reliability and validity. J. Sports. Sci. 2018, 36, 2202–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kotsifaki, A.; Whiteley, R.; Hansen, C. Dual Kinect v2 system can capture lower limb kinematics reasonably well in a clinical setting: Concurrent validity of a dual camera markerless motion capture system in professional football players. BMJ Open Sport Exer. Med. 2018, 4, 000441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agustsson, A.; Gislason, M.K.; Ingvarsson, P.; Rodby-Bousquet, E.; Sveisson, T. Validity and reliability of an iPad with a three-dimensional camera for posture imaging. Gait Posture 2019, 68, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vilas-Boas, M.D.C.; Choupina, H.M.P.; Rocha, A.P.; Fernandes, J.M.; Cunha, J.P.S. Full-body motion assessment: Concurrent validation of two body tracking depth sensors versus a gold standard system durins gait. J. Biomech. 2019, 87, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, S.; Nandy, A.; Yamaguchi, T.; Bonnet, V.; Venture, G. Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait. J. Biomech. 2020, 104, 109718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; McGorry, R.W.; Chou, L.S.; Lin, J.H.; Chang, C.C. Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect for measuring gait parameters during treadmill walking. Gait Posture 2015, 42, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahadori, S.; Davenport, P.; Immins, T.; Wainwright, T.W. Validation of joint angle measurements: Comparison of a novel low-cost marker-less system with an industry standard marker-based system. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2019, 43, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, R.; Takimoto, H.; Yamasaki, T.; Higashi, A. Validity of time series kinematical data as measured by a markerless motion capture system on a flatland for gait assessment. J. Biomech. 2018, 71, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harsted, S.; Holsgaard-Larsen, A.; Hestbæk, L.; Boyle, E.; Lauridsen, H.H. Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system. Chiropr. Man. Ther. 2019, 11, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lafayette, T.B.d.G.; Kunst, V.H.d.L.; Melo, P.V.d.S.; Guedes, P.d.O.; Teixeira, J.M.X.N.; Vasconcelos, C.R.d.; Teichrieb, V.; da Gama, A.E.F. Validation of Angle Estimation Based on Body Tracking Data from RGB-D and RGB Cameras for Biomechanical Assessment. Sensors 2023, 23, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nomenclatura | Anatomical Reference | |
---|---|---|
1 | R_ASIS | Right Anterior Superior Iliac Spine |
2 | L_ASIS | Left Anterior Superior Iliac Spine |
3 | R_PSIS | Right Posterior Superior Iliac Spine |
4 | L_PSIS | Left Posterior Superior Iliac Spine |
5 | R_TROC | Right Trochanter |
6 | L_TROC | Left Trochanter; |
7 | R_EPIL | Lateral Epicondyle of the Right Femur |
8 | L_EPIL | Lateral Epicondyle of the Left Femur |
9 | R_MEPIL | Medial Epicondyle of the Right Femur |
10 | L_MEPIL | Medial Epicondyle of the Left Femur |
11 | R_FIBH | Right Fibular Head |
12 | L_FIBH | Left Fibular Head; |
13 | R_TTUB | Right Tibial Tuberosity |
14 | L_TTUB | Left Tibial Tuberosity |
15 | R_LMAL | Right Lateral Malleolus |
16 | L_LMAL | Left Lateral Malleolus |
17 | R_MMAL | Right Medial Malleolus |
18 | L_LMAL | Left Medial Malleolus |
19 | R_CAL | Left Calcaneus |
20 | L_CAL | Right Calcaneus |
21 | R_1MET | 1st Right Metatarsal |
22 | L_1MET | 1st Left Metatarsal |
23 | R_2MET | 2nd Right Metatarsal |
24 | L_2MET | 2nd Left Metatarsal |
25 | R_5MET | 5th Right Metatarsal |
26 | L-5MET | 5th Left Metatarsal |
Movement | Qualisys | Mova 3D | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum Angle | Minimum Angle | ROM | Maximum Angle | Minimum Angle | ROM | ||
Hip abduction | ABD_RH | 151.5 | 92.5 | 59 | 110 | 90 | 20 |
ABD_LH | 115.9 | 92.2 | 23.7 | 105.2 | 90.7 | 14.5 | |
Squat | FLX_RK | 65.2 | 7.5 | 57.7 | 54.1 | 6.9 | 47.2 |
FLX_LK | 67.3 | 7.4 | 59.9 | 66.8 | 10.5 | 56.5 | |
FLX_RH | 79 | 24.4 | 54.3 | 87.9 | 57.4 | 30.6 | |
FLX_LH | 79.6 | 29.3 | 50.3 | 87.3 | 37.7 | 49.6 | |
Hip flexion | FLX_RH | 81.44 | 18.44 | 63 | 86 | 21.55 | 63.11 |
FLX_LH | 86.66 | 75.33 | 11.33 | 86.11 | 79.22 | 6.88 |
Movement | Mean Error (Qualisys—Mova 3D) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum Angle | Minimum Angle | ROM | ||
Hip abduction | ABD_RH | 41.50 | 2.50 | 39.00 |
ABD_LH | 10.70 | 1.50 | 9.20 | |
Squat | FLX_RK | 11.10 | 0.60 | 10.50 |
FLX_LK | 0.50 | −3.10 | 3.40 | |
FLX_RH | −8.90 | −33.00 | 23.70 | |
FLX_LH | −7.70 | −8.40 | 0.70 | |
Hip flexion | FLX_RH | −4.56 | −3.11 | −0.11 |
FLX_LH | 0.55 | −3.89 | 4.45 |
Pearson’s Correlation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | SD | 95% CI | p | ||
Hip abduction | ABD_RH | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
ABD_LH | 0.84 | 0.12 | 0.07 | <0.001 | |
Squat | FLX_RK | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.01 | <0.001 |
FLX_LK | 0.94 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.001 | |
FLX_RH | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.03 | <0.001 | |
FLX_LH | 0.87 | 0.05 | 0.03 | <0.001 | |
Hip flexion | FLX_RH | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
FLX_LH | −0.18 | 0.65 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Almeida, L.P.d.; Guenka, L.C.; Felipe, D.d.O.; Ishii, R.P.; Campos, P.S.d.; Burke, T.N. Correlation between MOVA3D, a Monocular Movement Analysis System, and Qualisys Track Manager (QTM) during Lower Limb Movements in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176657
Almeida LPd, Guenka LC, Felipe DdO, Ishii RP, Campos PSd, Burke TN. Correlation between MOVA3D, a Monocular Movement Analysis System, and Qualisys Track Manager (QTM) during Lower Limb Movements in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(17):6657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176657
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlmeida, Liliane Pinho de, Leandro Caetano Guenka, Danielle de Oliveira Felipe, Renato Porfirio Ishii, Pedro Senna de Campos, and Thomaz Nogueira Burke. 2023. "Correlation between MOVA3D, a Monocular Movement Analysis System, and Qualisys Track Manager (QTM) during Lower Limb Movements in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 17: 6657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176657