Next Article in Journal
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Very Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (VLS-SCLC)
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Potential Predictors of Prognosis and Sorafenib-Associated Survival Benefits in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
Previous Article in Journal
Solid Organ Transplantation Is Associated with an Increased Rate of Mismatch Repair Deficiency and PIK3CA Mutations in Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Overexpression of AKR1B10 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection

Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(1), 85-99; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30010007
by Yu-Yin Liu 1, Yueh-Wei Liu 1, Gong-Kai Huang 2, Kuo-Chen Hung 3, Yu-Hung Lin 1, Cheng-Hsi Yeh 1, Shih-Min Yin 1, Ching-Hua Tsai 3 and Yen-Hao Chen 4,5,6,7,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(1), 85-99; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30010007
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomarkers in Gastrointestinal Malignancies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study tried to prove that AKR1B10 overexpression can be an independent prognostic factor for worse survival in GC patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection.

The paper is clear in logic and rich in content, but there are still some limitations:

1.Bioinformatics analysis needs to be added to verify the conclusions of this paper.

2.The construction and validation of prediction model are also required in this paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This quite interesting manuscript has tried to demonstrate the prognostic significance of AKR1B10. The most beautiful section is the “discussion” part, which has brilliantly demonstrated the limitation of the study and put the several question marks. The introduction, method and result section is quite okay. Although there are couple of issues, which need to address:

1.     What is the unique finding of the manuscript comparing with similar previous study of Ahmed et al., 2019?

2.     Is there any data of serum AKR1B10 level of these patients?

3.     Dose the AKR1B10 expression correlate with lymph metastasis only?

4.     Despite significant outcome, why did you not highlight the association of AKR1B10 expression on adjuvant chemotherapy in result section? Can adjuvant chemotherapy induce AKR1B10 overexpression?

5.     Do only signet ring carcinoma samples correlate with AKR1B10 expression?

 

I would recommend including more interesting findings to improve the quality of the manuscript. Thanks again for your wonderful effort to make a nice manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have well completed the revision.

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks to the authors for their wonderful effort to make the better manuscript. 

Back to TopTop