Analysis of the Morpho-Geometrical Changes of the Root Canal System Produced by TF Adaptive vs. BioRace: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Teeth Selection
2.2. Teeth Preparation
2.3. Micro-CT Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hulsmann, M.; Peters, O.A.; Dummer, P.M. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod. Top. 2005, 10, 30–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schilder, H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 1974, 18, 269–296. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Aydin, C.; Inan, U.; Tunca, Y.M. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of used and new RaCe instruments. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010, 109, e131–e134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aydin, C.; Inan, U.; Yasar, S.; Bulucu, B.; Tunca, Y.M. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008, 105, e92–e97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sattapan, B.; Nervo, G.J.; Palamara, J.E.; Messer, H.H. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J. Endod. 2000, 26, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bidar, M.; Moradi, S.; Forghani, M.; Bidad, S.; Azghadi, M.; Rezvani, S.; Khoynezhad, S. Microscopic evaluation of cleaning efficiency of three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Iran. Endod. J. 2010, 5, 174–178. [Google Scholar]
- Capar, I.D.; Arslan, H.; Akcay, M.; Ertas, H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1638–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capar, I.D.; Ertas, H.; Ok, E.; Arslan, H.; Ertas, E.T. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.; Zhou, H.M.; Zheng, Y.F.; Campbell, L.; Peng, B.; Haapasalo, M. Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1566–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alapati, S.B.; Brantley, W.A.; Iijima, M.; Clark, W.A.; Kovarik, L.; Buie, C.; Liu, J.; Ben Johnson, W. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.Y.; Lee, W.; Kang, M.K.; Hur, B.; Kim, H.C. Single file reciprocating technique using conventional nickel-titanium rotary endodontic files. Scanning 2013, 35, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saber, S.E.; Nagy, M.M.; Schäfer, E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int. Endod. J. 2015, 48, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vadhana, S.; SaravanaKarthikeyan, B.; Nandini, S.; Velmurugan, N. Cyclic fatigue resistance of RaCe and Mtwo rotary files in continuous rotation and reciprocating motion. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strawn, S.E.; White, J.M.; Marshall, G.W.; Gee, L.; Goodis, H.E.; Marshall, S.J. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions--short term. J. Dent. 1996, 24, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamura, B.; Cox, T.C.; Heddaya, B.; Flake, N.M.; Johnson, J.D.; Paranjpe, A. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turkistani, A.K.; Gomaa, M.M.; Shafei, L.A.; Alsofi, L.; Majeed, A.; AlShwaimi, E. Shaping Ability of HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next Rotary Instruments in Curved Root Canals: A Micro-CT Study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2019, 20, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L.; De Luca, M.; Milana, V.; Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Rubini, A.G.; Al Sudani, D.; Sannino, G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann. Stomatol. (Roma) 2013, 4, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonaccorso, A.; Cantatore, G.; Condorelli, G.G.; Schafer, E.; Tripi, T.R. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paque, F.; Zehnder, M.; De-Deus, G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1394–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, O.A.; Laib, A.; Göhring, T.N.; Barbakow, F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J. Endod. 2001, 27, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, O.A.; Schonenberger, K.; Laib, A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2001, 34, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, S.A.; Dummer, P.M. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. Int. Endod. J. 2000, 33, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Omari, M.A.; Dummer, P.M. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J. Endod. 1995, 21, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergmans, L.; Van Cleynenbreugel, J.; Beullens, M.; Wevers, M.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Lambrechts, P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2003, 36, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghamdi, A.; Alsofi, L.; Balto, K. Effects of a Novel NiTi Thermomechanical Treatment on the Geometric Features of the Prepared Root Canal System. Materials 2020, 13, 5546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gergi, R.; Osta, N.; Bourbouze, G.; Zgheib, C.; Arbab-Chirani, R.; Naaman, A. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2015, 48, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Shen, Y.; Peng, B.; Haapasalo, M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomographic study. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1860–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velozo, C.; Silva, S.; Almeida, A.; Romeiro, K.; Vieira, B.; Dantas, H.; Sousa, F.; De Albuquerque, D.S. Shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Next in long oval-shaped canals: A micro-computed tomography study. Int. Endod. J. 2020, 53, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, O.A.; Boessler, C.; Paqué, F. Root canal preparation with a novel nickel-titanium instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: Canal surface preparation over time. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 1068–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paque, F.; Balmer, M.; Attin, T.; Peters, O.A. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomography study. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gagliardi, J.; Versiani, M.A.; de Sousa-Neto, M.D.; Plazas-Garzon, A.; Basrani, B. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 1718–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sen, B.H.; Piskin, B.; Demirci, T. Observation of bacteria and fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 1995, 11, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hülsmann, M.; Gressmann, G.; Schäfers, F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2003, 36, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Versümer, J.; Hülsmann, M.; Schäfers, F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2002, 35, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aminsobhani, M.; Razmi, H.; Nozari, S. Ex Vivo Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary File Systems in Root Canal Deviation: One File Only versus the Conventional Method. J. Dent. (Tehran) 2015, 12, 469–477. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, N.; Wang, C.Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Yu, X.Q.; Xue, M. Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2016, 25, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ordinola-Zapata, R.; Bramante, C.M.; Duarte, M.A.; Cavenago, B.C.; Jaramillo, D.; Versiani, M.A. Shaping ability of reciproc and TF adaptive systems in severely curved canals of rapid microCT-based prototyping molar replicas. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2014, 22, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishen, A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod. Top. 2006, 13, 57–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, W.; Wu, Y.; Smales, R.J. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.; Coil, J.M.; Zhou, H.; Zheng, Y.; Haapasalo, M. HyFlex nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: Metallurgical properties. Int. Endod. J. 2013, 46, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Parameters | BioRace n = 20 Mean ± SD | p ** | TF Adaptive n = 20 Mean ± SD | p ** | p * | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volume | Before (mm3) | 4.18 ± 1.48 | 5.12 ± 2.62 | 0.338 | ||
After (mm3) | 5.84 ± 1.13 | 6.67 ± 2.57 | 0.365 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 1.67 ± 0.74 | <0.001 ** | 1.56 ± 1.07 | 0.001 ** | 0.969 | |
Surface Area | Before (mm2) | 42.37 ± 12.56 | 44.72 ± 17.26 | 0.732 | ||
After (mm2) | 46.99 ± 10.69 | 49.43 ± 17.50 | 0.711 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 4.62 ± 6.07 | 0.039 ** | 4.71 ± 3.97 | 0.005 ** | 0.789 | |
Structural Model Index (SMI) | Before | 1.80 ± 1.07 | 1.95 ± 0.91 | 0.739 | ||
After | 2.51 ± 1.24 | 2.10 ± 0.78 | 0.385 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 0.71 ± 0.88 | 0.030 ** | 0.15 ± 0.52 | 0.384 | 0.195 | |
Thickness | Before (mm) | 0.321 ± 0.14 | 0.375 ± 0.14 | 0.394 | ||
After (mm) | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 0.915 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 0.21 ± 0.099 | <0.001 ** | 0.15 ± 0.09 | 0.001 ** | 0.195 | |
Unprepared Area | Static Voxels | 80,468.20 ± 35 | 67,006.70 ± 22 | 0.323 | ||
After (%) | 42 ± 15% | 36 ± 14% | 0.405 |
Parameters | BioRace n = 20 Mean ± SD | p ** | TF Adaptive n = 20 Mean ± SD | p ** | p * | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volume | Before (mm3) | 5.85 ± 1.86 | 7.58 ± 4.59 | 0.283 | ||
After (mm3) | 7.25 ± 1.97 | 8.22 ± 4.46 | 0.534 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 1.40 ± 0.88 | 0.001 ** | 0.64 ± 0.66 | 0.014 ** | 0.043 | |
Surface Area | Before (mm2) | 48.71 ± 14.99 | 47.55 ± 25.22 | 0.902 | ||
After (mm2) | 51.86 ± 14.78 | 49.93 ± 29.59 | 0.856 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 3.14 ± 4.67 | 0.062 | 2.38 ± 5.92 | 0.236 | 0.751 | |
SMI | Before | 1.04 ± 1.32 | 1.28 ± 0.87 | 0.638 | ||
After | 1.50 ± 1.21 | 1.46 ± 1.14 | 0.942 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 0.46 ± 0.93 | 0.154 | 0.18 ± 1.04 | 0.595 | 0.536 | |
Thickness | Before (mm) | 0.38 ± 0.16 | 0.47 ± 0.12 | 0.193 | ||
After (mm) | 0.52 ± 0.10 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | 0.288 | |||
Increase (Δ%) | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 0.001 ** | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.001 ** | 0.358 | |
Unprepared Area | Static Voxels | 86,191.50 ± 42,415.72 | 100,673.80 ± 40,002.76 | 0.442 | ||
After (%) | 46 ± 22 | 52 ± 17 | 0.551 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alsofi, L.; Al Harbi, M.; Stauber, M.; Balto, K. Analysis of the Morpho-Geometrical Changes of the Root Canal System Produced by TF Adaptive vs. BioRace: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. Materials 2021, 14, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030531
Alsofi L, Al Harbi M, Stauber M, Balto K. Analysis of the Morpho-Geometrical Changes of the Root Canal System Produced by TF Adaptive vs. BioRace: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. Materials. 2021; 14(3):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030531
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlsofi, Loai, Muhannad Al Harbi, Martin Stauber, and Khaled Balto. 2021. "Analysis of the Morpho-Geometrical Changes of the Root Canal System Produced by TF Adaptive vs. BioRace: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study" Materials 14, no. 3: 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030531