Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Shear Model for Steel-Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Corbels with Welded-Anchorage Longitudinal Reinforcement
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructural, Mechanical, and Electrochemical Characterization of CrMoNbTiZr High-Entropy Alloy for Biomedical Application
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Thermal Insulation Bricks Using Pleurotus florida Spent Mushroom
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of the Current Research Status of Biodegradable Zinc Alloys and Composites for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys

by
Cristina Jimenez-Marcos
1,
Julia Claudia Mirza-Rosca
1,2,*,
Madalina Simona Baltatu
3,* and
Petrica Vizureanu
3,4
1
Mechanical Engineering Department, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University, 35017 Tafira, Spain
2
Materials Engineering and Welding Department, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania
3
Department of Technologies and Equipments for Materials Processing, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi, Blvd. Mangeron, No. 51, 700050 Iasi, Romania
4
Technical Sciences Academy of Romania, Dacia Blvd 26, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(14), 4906; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144906
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 9 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Research on Biocompatible Alloys)

Abstract

:
The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the mechanical characteristics and biocompatibility of two novel titanium alloys, Ti15Mo7ZrxSi (x = 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1). These samples had already undergone grinding, polishing, cutting, and chipping. Electrochemical, metallographic, three-point bending, and microhardness studies were conducted on the studied materials to determine their corrosion behavior, microstructure, Young’s modulus, and hardness. The first investigations revealed that both samples had biphasic and dendritic structures, elastic moduli that were between the highest and minimum values achieved by around 20 GPa, and favorable behavior when in contact with physiological fluids at ambient temperature. Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si and Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, the research samples, had greater corrosion potentials, reduced corrosion rates, and therefore higher corrosion resistance, as well as modulus of elasticity values that were comparable to and closer to those of human bone. The results of this investigation indicate that both alloys exhibit favorable corrosion behavior, great biocompatibility, Young’s modulus results lower than those of conventional alloys used in biomedical implants, and hardness values higher than commercially pure titanium.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, there is a growing interest in the development of biomaterials for various medical applications, such as orthopedics [1], drug administration [2,3], dentistry [4], tissue engineering [5], and cardiovascular systems [6]. These biomaterials aim to improve the quality of life and longevity of individuals, particularly in the context of chronic musculoskeletal diseases like osteoarthritis, which affects a significant portion of the population.
Biocompatibility is a crucial requirement for any biomaterial intended for medical use. Biocompatibility refers to the ability of a material to fulfill its function in medical treatment without causing adverse reactions in the body. To be successful, biomaterials must possess specific properties, including high ductility, fatigue and wear resistance, absence of cytotoxicity, a combination of high strength and low Young’s modulus similar to human cortical bone (ranging from 10 to 30 GPa), and the ability to integrate well with the surrounding bone.
While polymers and ceramics are commonly used biomaterials [7], they often exhibit low mechanical strength and brittleness, limiting their applications in harsh conditions. Therefore, metallic materials, particularly titanium and its alloys [8], have gained prominence in orthopedic surgery. Approximately 70–80% of implants are made from metallic biomaterials, such as 316L stainless steel, CoCrMo alloys, Ti6Al4V, and NiTi alloys [9].
However, using metals as implants presents challenges as the higher elastic modulus of metals compared to bone can lead to stress shielding, causing osteoporosis due to the mismatch in mechanical properties. Moreover, many metallic biomaterials release toxic ions into adjacent tissues, exhibit poor wear and corrosion resistance, and may have low biocompatibility [10]. To address these issues, the addition of alloying components that do not have harmful effects on the body has been explored [11,12].
Corrosion is a significant concern when using metallic implants, as it can lead to material deterioration and subsequent implant failure. To prevent corrosion, a protective film is usually formed on the material’s surface to make it impermeable to the surrounding environment. Titanium and its alloys have emerged as suitable biomaterials for various applications due to their biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, low modulus of elasticity, and thermal stability [13,14,15,16]. Titanium’s ability to form a stable oxide coating on its surface contributes to its excellent corrosion resistance.
Different types of titanium-based alloys exist, including α, α + β, and β titanium alloys. The addition of alloying elements allows for the modification of alloy properties. α-stabilizers (C, N, O, Al) increase the allotropic transformation temperature, while β-stabilizers (V, Nb, Mo, Ta, Fe, Mn, Cr, Co, W, Ni, Cu, Si) decrease it [8,15,17].
Titanium–molybdenum (Ti-Mo) alloys have gained attention as potential biomaterials due to their favorable mechanical and corrosion resistance. Ti-Mo alloys can form a stable oxide layer on their surface, protecting them from corrosion and degradation in aggressive environments [18,19,20].
The design considerations for Ti-Mo-Zr alloys were based on several factors influenced by fabrication method [21] or another alloying element, such as chromium [22]. Titanium is considered to have extremely low toxicity for the human body and exhibits excellent interaction with bone due to its corrosion resistance and lack of rejection by the body. Molybdenum is a beta-stabilizing element with low toxicity and can help adjust the alloy’s mechanical properties to be more similar to human bone by decreasing the modulus of elasticity. Zirconium, a neutral stabilizer, is becoming increasingly desirable for medical applications due to its biocompatibility, low modulus of elasticity, and corrosion resistance [23].
In recent years, Ti-Mo-Zr-Si alloys have been developed as potential biomaterials by incorporating small quantities of silicon into Ti-Mo-Zr alloys [24]. Silicon is a biocompatible element found in human bone, and its addition to the alloy improves corrosion resistance, creep resistance at high temperatures, ductility, and strength. It also contributes to reducing the elastic modulus, making it closer to that of human bone [25,26]. The specific effects of silicon content on titanium alloys can vary depending on the other alloying elements, processing conditions, and the intended application of the alloy. Therefore, comprehensive testing and characterization are necessary to determine the optimal silicon content for a particular titanium alloy to achieve the desired properties.
In the current study, a Ti-15Mo-7Zr base alloy is considered, and we analyze the effect of the addition of silicon (with 0%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.00% Si) in the microstructure, and the corrosion resistance, microhardness, and elastic modulus of the alloys obtained in an effort to develop new alloys for biomedical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Preparation

The examined alloys’ chemical compositions (%wt) are shown in Table 1. The alloys were produced using the arc remelting method in an argon environment. The melting process takes place under high vacuum conditions, achieved by utilizing a pump system to evacuate the working chamber. When the samples are melted, the presence of oxygen leads to a significant decrease in vacuum within the working chamber. Once the high vacuum is restored, argon is introduced into the working chamber, where the samples are melted, under atmospheric conditions. This approach ensures the proper temperature and facilitates easy handling of the samples, resulting in a high level of uniformity in their chemical composition.
The Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering at Gheorghe Asachi Technical University in Iasi, Romania, carried out this technique. The alloys were melted, then remelted six times (three times in each face), and finally formed into an ingot in order to obtain the proper homogeneity. Moreover, for their preparation and testing, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) received a portion of the ingots.
Several operations were carried out as a first step to analyze the electrochemical, metallographic, bending, and microhardness properties of the studied samples, such as embedding the samples by adding epoxy resin or catalyst in a 4:1 ratio into a mold, which was demolded after 24 h. The specimens were then cut into 1 to 1.5 mm thick plates using a grinding wheel and jaws on a Buehler IsoMet 4000 precision saw (Chicago, IL, USA). For the mechanical and electrochemical testing, the sliced specimens were reassembled. The specimens were then polished using the Struers TegraPol-11 polishing machine (Copenhagen, Denmark) at a force of 20 N and at a speed of 300 rpm. The progressive carbide grinding method was utilized. Carbide abrasive sheets of increasing grit were utilized, beginning with 400 grits, and ending with P2500 grit. Finally, mirror polishing cloths with 0.1 μm α alumina suspension were utilized. These procedures for sample preparation for metallographic testing followed ASTM E3-11(2017) [27]. In order to realize the mechanical tests, vertical slices with a thickness of about 2 mm were produced once more on the cutting machine.

2.2. Microstructure

The compounds and phases that make up a metallic substance are arranged spatially in metallography, together with any impurities or potential mechanical faults.
Images of the surfaces of every specimen were acquired using the Axio Vert.A1 MAT ZEISS optical metallographic microscope (Jena, Germany) to analyze the microstructure. At intervals of about 15 s, each sample was submerged in Kroll’s reagent, which is made of 20 mL glycerin, 30 mL hydrochloric acid, and 10 mL nitric acid, and the attacked surface was photographed. The test was carried out three times.

2.3. Electrochemical Tests

A sample was placed in an electrochemical cell with three electrodes for the electrochemical tests: the samples acted as the working electrodes, a saturated calomel electrode served as the reference electrode, and a platinum electrode acted as the counter electrode. The area of each sample was determined to run the tests. The mmol/L values of the Grifols Laboratories’ (Barcelona, Spain) Ringer solution were as follows: Na+ 129.9, Cl 111.7, C3H5O3 27.2, K+ 5.4, and Ca2+ 1.8.
Corrosion Potential, Corrosion Rate, and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy were performed by applying the BioLogic Essential SP-150 potentiostat (Seyssinet-Pariset, France). The tests were performed at 25 °C in aerated Ringer solution.

2.3.1. Corrosion Potential (Ecorr)

Applying the “Ecorr vs. Time” approach found in the Ec-Lab program, the 24 h corrosion potential of each sample was determined. Potential readings were taken every 300 s or every time there was a 100 mV change in potential. The collected data were analyzed, and a potential versus time graph was created.

2.3.2. Corrosion Rate (Vcorr)

The “Linear Polarization” approach was selected to carry out these experiments [28], and the sample surface area value and the 20 min test period were entered to verify its viability. With data taken every 0.50 s, the potential scanning revealed a 0.167 mV/s time-variation relationship from −0.025 to 0.025 V against open circuit potential (OCP) and intensity maintained at 100 % during the potential scanning [29]. Following the presentation of these linear polarization curves, EC-Lab’s “Tafel Fit” approach was used to obtain the corrosion rate estimates for each sample.

2.3.3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

The AC impedance measurements were recorded with an AC potential amplitude of 20 mV and single sine wave measurements were conducted at frequencies between 10−1 and 2 × 10−5 Hz. To analyze the characteristics of the oxide film, the impedance spectra were recorded at 7 different DC potentials around corrosion potential, in the range Ecorr ± 300 mV, with a 100 mV step from Ecorr, permitting the system to stabilize for 5 min at each potential. To represent these data, Nyquist and Bode diagrams were utilized, and for their simulation, equivalent circuits (EC) were employed [30].

2.4. Three-Point Bending Test

The Bose ElectroForce® 3100 machine (Framingham, MA, USA) was used to perform the three-point bending method; it complies with ISO 7438:2020 [31] and has a 20 N force resistance limit.
In order to realize this methodology, each rectangular cross-section specimen was positioned at the extremities of the bottom shank of the testing apparatus, with a distance between supports ranging from 7.80 to 10.63 mm depending on the specimen length. During the experiment, the specimen was loaded vertically while moving at a 3 mm/s linear speed at its center until it reached its yield stress or broke. The obtained values of the applied force against the displacement of the samples were plotted, and their slope was calculated to establish the modulus of elasticity.

2.5. Microhardness Test

Using the Future Tech FM-810 hardness tester (Kawasaki, Japan), for each sample’s applied load, in this case 5, 25, and 50 gf, 10 measurements were taken, in accordance with ISO 14577-1:2015 [32]. The mark may contain fragments of many phases as the stress rises, providing an approximation of the material’s total hardness. When relatively light weights are placed, it is likely that the mark will only be discovered in one phase, allowing the hardness of that phase to be assessed. The Vickers microhardness values were then computed automatically by the iVicky software (v2.0, Sinowon, Dongguan, China) using the observed diagonal lengths. The number of indents created was plotted against the scan length.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructural Analysis

Figure 1 displays the surfaces of the four studied samples after they were etched with the reagent.
At room temperature, cpTi has a hexagonal closest-packed (HCP) structure with an α-phase, but beyond 883 °C, it has a body-centered cubic (BCC) structure with a β-phase [33].
In contrast to Zr, which is regarded as a neutral element because it virtually has no influence on the α/β-phases, the β-phase is stable at temperatures below 883 °C when Mo and Si are present [8].
After being chemically etched, it can be seen that all four of the tested samples had a biphasic and dendritic structure. Additionally, the addition of Si caused the interdendritic zone to expand while the size of the dendrites dropped by about 12% as the silicon concentration increased with 0.25%. Fine grains hinder the propagation of cracks, enhancing the material’s resistance to fatigue.

3.2. Electrochemical Tests

3.2.1. Corrosion Potential (Ecorr)

A quantitative measure of corrosion behavior is corrosion potential evolution over time, although this information is still insufficient for a thorough examination.
Figure 2 and Table 2 show the curves of corrosion potential as a function of time after 24 h of immersion in Ringer’s solution with their respective values of initial potential, after 1 hour and after 24 h of testing. The potential, known as open-circuit potential (OCP) in these circumstances, reveals the sample’s tendency for corrosion. From the data obtained after one hour of immersion, the potential of the samples Ti15Mo7Zr, Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si increases due to passivation of the surfaces, reaching values between −0.337 V and 0.328 V, while the potential of Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si slightly decreases to −0.227 V.
Overall, during the 24 h experiment, the potentials of every studied sample increased because of the passive layer thickening, reaching final values of −0.194 V, −0.194 V, −0.263 V, and −0.308 V, respectively. Therefore, the potential curves tended to increase progressively until signs of a possible stabilization of the potential could be observed, suggesting that the passive layer is thermodynamically resistant under Ringer’s solution conditions, with the exception of Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, which presents a plot with many irregular peaks.
Since the corrosion potentials values of Ti15Mo7Zr and Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si are equal and they are higher to those of the examined samples and cpTi (from −0.10 V to −0.15 V), this indicates that the inclusion of Si alters the passive layer’s properties.
As the Si content in the titanium alloy increases, the corrosion potential becomes more negative. This shift towards more negative values suggests that the alloy becomes more susceptible to corrosion and indicates a decrease in the alloy’s stability in the given environment. If the added silicon content exceeds 0.5%, the open circuit potential shifts to more negative values due to the formation of galvanic couples between the Si-containing regions and the rest of the titanium alloy, leading to localized electrochemical reactions and a negative shift in the OCP. The Si content may influence the composition, thickness, and stability of the passive oxide layer formed on the surface of the alloy. Changes in the passivation behavior can result in variations of the OCP.

3.2.2. Corrosion Rate (Vcorr)

Figure 3 shows the results of the linear polarization technique, which was performed to measure the alloys’ rate of corrosion, displayed on a semi-logarithmic scale of the current results.
Ti15Mo7Zr1Si shows higher values of anodic corrosion potential and current (Ecorr and Icorr, respectively), which is a measure of how much the alloy has been oxidized, than the other samples studied, as can be seen in Table 3. By examining the curve displayed against open circuit potential (OCP) across a range of 0.25 V, Tafel slopes (βc and βa) were calculated. An alloy prone to passivation will have a value of a greater than c, while an alloy prone to corrosion will have a value of a less than c. In our case, all four samples have a tendency to passivate, i.e., to have a passive layer created on their surface.
Moreover, using the corrosion current (Icorr), the constant (K) that establishes the corrosion rate units (1.288 × 105 miliinches/A-cm-year), the equivalent weight (EW) in g/eq, the density (d) in g/cm3, and the area (A) of each sample (in cm2), Table 3 displays the Tafel curve parameters and the corrosion rate (Vcorr) of the tested samples.
V c o r r = I c o r r · K · E W d · A
In this case, a minimum Vcorr of 0.03 μm/year (Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si) and a maximum Vcorr of 0.22 μm/year (Ti15Mo7Zr1Si) were achieved, whereas commercial pure titanium, under similar circumstances, had a greater Vcorr of 0.12 μm/year.
As the polarization resistance (Rp) value rises, the alloy’s corrosion resistance increases, according to the results of the “Rp Fit” study performed using the EC-Lab program on the linear polarization curves of the Vcorr. Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si and Ti15Mo7Zr0.75 alloys are extremely corrosion-resistant, with the Rp even reaching 106 Ω·cm2 for highly corrosion-resistant materials, whereas Ti15Mo7Zr and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si had lower values of about 105 Ω·cm2. Thus, the Ti15Mo7Zr1Si sample obtained the worst corrosion resistance [34].

3.2.3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

A high-throughput method for examining interfacial properties linked to processes occurring on the alloy surfaces is electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. EIS has a variety of benefits over other electrochemical techniques, since it is a steady-state methodology that can probe, in this case, from 0.1 Hz to 1 × 106 Hz and can quantify very small signals.
Each alloy’s EIS data are shown in Nyquist and Bode plots for the seven distinct potentials that were recorded in Ringer solution. By measuring EIS at both cathodic and anodic potentials relative to the corrosion potential, it is possible to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the corrosion behavior of the alloy over a range of electrochemical conditions. This information helps to evaluate the overall corrosion resistance and stability of the alloy in the given environment and identify critical potentials or conditions that favor corrosion or passivation.
When using Nyquist graphs, the hypothetical impedance results were contrasted with the actual values. For each and every applied potential, a capacitive arc is shown in Figure 4. In general, in these Nyquist curves, a capacitive arc is shown and it can be seen that the impedance values increase as more positive potentials are applied.
The logarithm curves of the impedance modulus and phase shift angle of the Ti15Mo7ZrxSi samples dissolved in Ringer’s solution are displayed using Bode plots.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the Bode impedance and Bode phase diagrams, respectively, while Table 4 shows the results obtained from Ecorr and ±300 mV versus Ecorr.
Figure 5 and Table 4 indicate greater impedance values for the four samples at the lowest frequency (0.1 Hz), with lower values for the Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si sample and higher results for the Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si sample, showing that the latter alloy’s corrosion resistance has improved. In addition, the impedance values tended to increase the more positive the applied potentials were. In addition, a specific behavior of passive film growth was observed for each sample, which has a tendency to exhibit a capacitive behavior.
Figure 6 and Table 4 show the curves and maximum values obtained for the phase angles of the samples, which tend to increase the more positive the applied potentials are. As a result, after examining the studied samples, it was found that the Bode phase curves showed a single-phase process. Furthermore, with increasing potential value, the phase angle tends to increase and the process takes place in a single step, i.e., in a time constant, when the curve starts to decline, although in the curves of the Ti15Mo7Zr, Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si, and Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si samples there is the possibility of the onset of a second time constant.
The equivalent circuit model R(QR)(QR), which best fits the experimental findings of the study for Ti15Mo7ZrxSi alloys, is shown in Figure 7. This circuit shows that, up until the alloy is achieved, the surface of the samples exhibits a resistance to dissolving, together with porous and compact passive films.
The resistance in ohms of the electrolyte was represented in the model and in Equation (1) as Rsol, the resistances of the porous and compact passive films as R1 and R2, respectively, and the capacitances of the passive film as CPE1 and CPE2, which are the constant phase elements. The constant phase element reproduces a capacitor (n = 1.0), a semi-infinite Warburg impedance (n = 0.5), or a resistor (n = 0.0) as a function of the values of the parameters n1 and n2, as well as the applied frequency, f.
Z f = R s o l + R 1 R 1 C P E 1 j 2 π f n 1 + 1 + R 2 R 2 C P E 2 j 2 π f n 2 + 1
In Table 5, it is noted that the corrosion resistance (Rp = R1 + R2) increased with the addition of silicon, reaching values up to 106 Ω cm2 for the Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si samples, indicating that the materials present high corrosion resistance, being higher for Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si.

3.3. Three-Point Bending Test

Table 6 shows the modulus of elasticity’s average values (E) of the four specimens tested with their respective standard deviation, which were found by following Equation (3), considering the applied load (F), the distance between supports at which the equipment’s lower shank is placed for placing samples (L), the moment of inertia (I), and the deformation (δ):
E = F · L 3 48 · δ · I · 10 3
Since the specimens have a rectangular cross-section, Equation (4) defines the moment of inertia where w is the specimen’s width and h is its thickness.
I = w · h 3 12
After calculating the average values of each specimen’s elasticity modulus, it can be observed that the lower E value was obtained for the TiMo15Zr7Si0.5 sample (82.4 ± 9.2 GPa), while the upper E value was for TiMo15Zr7 (61.5 ± 8.4 GPa). This fact indicates that the small addition of silicon could help the samples to decrease their Young’s modulus and to approach the E of human bone (7–30 GPa).
Nevertheless, the results obtained are higher than those of the TiMoSi alloy (20–43 GPa) and within ranges that are comparable to those discovered in earlier studies, such as those of the TiMoZrTa alloy (52–69 GPa). The research alloy, TiMoZrSi, has a substantially lower Young’s modulus when compared to more widely used alloys in industry, medicine, and dentistry, such as stainless steel (190–210 GPa), cpTitanium (105 GPa), Ti6Al4V (110 GPa), and CoCrMo (210–253 GPa) [35,36].

3.4. Microhardness Test

The microhardness values in HV 0.005, HV 0.025, and HV 0.05, as well as the standard deviation and the minimum and maximum values for the 10 indentations made on each sample, are shown in Figure 8 and Table 7.
Figure 8 shows a comparison of the 10 indentations performed on the four specimens for each load applied and their calculated averages. In general, the values obtained range between 300 and 450 HV for the three applied loads, although some very high peaks can be observed against other very low ones, which would indicate the existence of harder or softer areas on the surface of the samples and, therefore, a slight lack of homogeneity during the manufacturing process of the samples due to the varying hardness ratings of the alpha and beta phases and the orientation of the material’s crystals. Additionally, for the three loads applied, the mean HV values of the studied samples were around 350 and 400 HV, approximately.
Table 7 shows more clearly the obtained averages, where for 5 gf applied, the TiMo15Zr7Si1 sample achieved a higher value (396 ± 32 HV), while for 25 and 50 gf, the sample that presented higher microhardness values was TiMo15Zr7Si0.75 (389 ± 13 HV; 395 ± 14). In turn, for the 5 gf load, the minimum and maximum values were 247 and 451 HV (TiMo15Zr7Si0.5), respectively. For the 25 gf loading, the minimum value was 268 HV, and a maximum of 433 HV was reached for the TiMo15Zr7Si1 sample. Finally, when applying the 50 gf load, TiMo15Zr7Si0.5 obtained the minimum and maximum values of 218 and 427 HV, respectively. Therefore, by adding silicon to the samples, a slight increase of the hardness values appears.
Moreover, the values found in this research were lower than those of conventional alloys like CoCrMo (155–601 HV) and Ti6Al4V (541 HV) [35], but higher than those of cpTi [37,38].
By measuring hardness at different loads, we can observe how the hardness of the material changes with increasing plastic deformation. This information is especially important for understanding the alloy’s resistance to deformation, its ability to withstand applied loads, and its response to forming or shaping processes. In some cases, variations in hardness values with different loads may suggest the presence of localized variations in the microstructure, such as variations in grain size, phases, or the presence of inclusions. By examining the hardness through different loadings, the different phases of the material’s microstructure can be identified.

4. Conclusions

Four new titanium alloys’ mechanical properties and corrosion behavior have been compared and contrasted in this study. Microstructural, corrosion potential and corrosion rate curves, EIS, three-point bending, and microhardness results have produced the following findings:
  • After the samples were exposed to Kroll reagent, biphasic dendritic patterns were seen on their surfaces. The dendrites became smaller when silicon was added because silicon is a strong grain refiner in titanium alloys. It promotes the formation of fine grains that hinder the propagation of cracks, enhancing the material’s resistance to fatigue.
  • Both samples’ potential values grew during the immersion duration without diminishing, indicating that the passive layer, which was produced on the surface of each sample, is thermodynamically resilient under standard circumstances. Silicon oxide forms a protective oxide layer on the alloy surface, reducing the rate of oxidation and improving the alloys’ resistance to body fluid degradation.
  • Since the polarization resistance was fairly large, the low corrosion currents and rates showed the tested samples’ exceptional performance in the evaluated environment, Ringer solution. R(QR)(QR) was the EC that most closely fit the measured EIS data, and as additional positive potentials were applied, the phase angle and the impedance results tended to rise. The sample 0.5%Si had the lowest corrosion rate because this is the solubility limit of silicon in the particular titanium alloy, and when exceeding this content, the presence of Si may create galvanic couples between the Si-containing regions and the rest of the titanium alloy, leading to localized electrochemical reactions.
  • By examining the hardness through different loadings, two different phases, one hard and one soft, of the material’s microstructure were identified. Microhardness and elastic modulus values for both instances were lower than those for several conventional biomedical alloys.
In general, all samples showed good chemical and biological qualities, with slightly better results for the Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si sample.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.M.-R.; methodology, P.V.; validation, J.C.M.-R.; investigation, C.J.-M., M.S.B., and P.V.; writing—original draft, C.J.-M.; funding acquisition, M.S.B.; project administration, P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was financially supported by the Project “Network of excellence in applied research and innovation for doctoral and postdoctoral programs/InoHubDoc”, a project co-funded by the European Social Fund financing agreement no. POCU/993/6/13/153437. This paper was also supported by “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University from Iaşi (TUIASI), through the Project “Performance and excellence in postdoctoral research 2022”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zaokari, Y.; Persaud, A.; Ibrahim, A. Biomaterials for Adhesion in Orthopedic Applications: A Review. Eng. Regen. 2020, 1, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aggarwal, D.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, S. Drug-Loaded Biomaterials for Orthopedic Applications: A Review. J. Control. Release 2022, 344, 113–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marcello, E.; Chiono, V. Biomaterials-Enhanced Intranasal Delivery of Drugs as a Direct Route for Brain Targeting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lin, Y.; Fu, M.L.; Harb, I.; Ma, L.X.; Tran, S.D. Functional Biomaterials for Local Control of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rafique, M.; Ali, O.; Shafiq, M.; Yao, M.; Wang, K.; Ijima, H.; Kong, D.; Ikeda, M. Insight on Oxygen-Supplying Biomaterials Used to Enhance Cell Survival, Retention, and Engraftment for Tissue Repair. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morrison, E.; Suvarnapathaki, S.; Blake, L.; Camci-Unal, G. Unconventional Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 17, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, L.; Yin, J.; Gao, X. Additive Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass and Its Polymer Composites as Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: A Review. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kaur, M.; Singh, K. Review on Titanium and Titanium Based Alloys as Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 844–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Niinomi, M.; Nakai, M.; Hieda, J. Development of New Metallic Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3888–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rao, S.; Ushida, T.; Tateishi, T.; Okazaki, Y.; Asao, S. Effect of Ti, Al, and V Ions on the Relative Growth Rate of Fibroblasts (L929) and Osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) Cells. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 1996, 6, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Y.L.; Niinomi, M.; Akahori, T. Changes in Mechanical Properties of Ti Alloys in Relation to Alloying Additions of Ta and Hf. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 483–484, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Y.L.; Niinomi, M.; Akahori, T. Effects of Ta Content on Young’s Modulus and Tensile Properties of Binary Ti-Ta Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 371, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, L.C.; Chen, L.Y. A Review on Biomedical Titanium Alloys: Recent Progress and Prospect. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 21, 1801215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mareci, D.; Chelariu, R.; Dan, I.; Gordin, D.M.; Gloriant, T. Corrosion Behaviour of β-Ti20Mo Alloy in Artificial Saliva. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21, 2907–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kolli, R.P.; Devaraj, A. A Review of Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys. Metals 2018, 8, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Carobolante, J.P.A.; Pereira Júnior, A.; Bortolini Junior, C.; Barboza da Silva, K.; Sabino, R.M.; Popat, K.C.; Claro, A.P.R.A. Processing and Characterization of a New Quaternary Alloy Ti10Mo8Nb6Zr for Potential Biomedical Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 8636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oliveira, N.T.C.; Aleixo, G.; Caram, R.; Guastaldi, A.C. Development of Ti-Mo Alloys for Biomedical Applications: Microstructure and Electrochemical Characterization. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 452–453, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perdomo, P.P.S.; Suárez, N.R.F.; Verdú-Vázquez, A.; Rosca, J.C.M. Comparative EIS Study of Titanium-Based Materials in High Corrosive Environments. Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rosca, J.C.M.; Santana, E.D.H.; Castro, J.R.; Lopez, A.S.; Vasilescu, E.V.; Drob, P.; Vasilescu, C. Characterisation of Anodic Films Formed on Titanium and Its Alloys. Mater. Corros. 2005, 56, 692–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, W.; Chen, M.; Lu, X.; Zhang, D.-W.; Singh, H.-P.; Yu, J.-S.; Pan, Y.; Qu, X.-H.; Liu, C.-Z. Effects of Mo Content on Corrosion and Tribocorrosion Behaviours of Ti-Mo Orthopaedic Alloys Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy. Corros. Sci. 2020, 168, 108557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Shareef, N. Microstructure and Properties of Ti-Zr-Mo Alloys Fabricated by Laser Directed Energy Deposition. Materials 2023, 16, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Elshalakany, A.B.; Ali, S.; Amigó Mata, A.; Eessaa, A.K.; Mohan, P.; Osman, T.A.; Amigó Borrás, V. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-Mo-Zr-Cr Biomedical Alloys by Powder Metallurgy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2017, 26, 1262–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Florido-suarez, N.; Hulka, I.; Mirza-Rosca, J.; Saceleanu, A. Stability Range of Ti-Zr Alloy for Dental Implants. Microsc. Microanal. 2022, 28, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jimenez-Marcos, C.; Mirza-Rosca, J.C.; Baltatu, M.S.; Vizureanu, P. Experimental Research on New Developed Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verestiuc, L.; Spataru, M.-C.; Baltatu, M.S.; Butnaru, M.; Solcan, C.; Sandu, A.V.; Voiculescu, I.; Geanta, V.; Vizureanu, P. New Ti–Mo–Si Materials for Bone Prosthesis Applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 113, 104198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, Z.; Dai, X.; Middleton, H. Effect of Silicon on Corrosion Resistance of Ti–Si Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM E3-11(2017); Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  28. Material, C.; Databases, P. Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Anodic. Annu. B ASTM Stand. 2004, 94, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  29. ASTM G 102-89; Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1999; Volume 89, pp. 1–7.
  30. ISO 16773-1-4:2016; Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) on Coated and Uncoated Metallic Specimens. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  31. ISO 7438:2020; International Organization for Standardization Metallic Materials—Bend Test. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  32. ISO 14577-1:2015; Metallic Materials—Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters—Part 1: Test Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/56626.html (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  33. Peters, M.; Leyens, C. Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; ISBN 3527305343. [Google Scholar]
  34. Popa, M.V.; Vasilescu, E.; Drob, P.; Anghel, M.; Vasilescu, C.; Mirza-Rosca, I.; Lopez, A.S. Anodic Passivity of Some Titanium Base Alloys in Aggressive Environments. Mater. Corros. 2002, 53, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sandu, A.V.; Baltatu, M.S.; Nabialek, M.; Savin, A.; Vizureanu, P. Characterization and Mechanical Proprieties of New TiMo Alloys Used for Medical Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bocchetta, P.; Chen, L.Y.; Tardelli, J.D.C.; Dos Reis, A.C.; Almeraya-Calderón, F.; Leo, P. Passive Layers and Corrosion Resistance of Biomedical Ti-6al-4v and β-Ti Alloys. Coatings 2021, 11, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Da Rocha, S.S.; Adabo, G.L.; Henriques, G.E.P.; Nóbilo, M.A.D.A. Vickers Hardness of Cast Commercially Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Submitted to Heat Treatments. Braz. Dent. J. 2006, 17, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baltatu, M.S.; Spataru, M.C.; Verestiuc, L.; Balan, V.; Solcan, C.; Sandu, A.V.; Geanta, V.; Voiculescu, I.; Vizureanu, P. Design, Synthesis, and Preliminary Evaluation for Ti-Mo-Zr-Ta-Si Alloys for Potential Implant Applications. Materials 2021, 14, 6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Optical microstructure after Kroll reagent etching for (a) Ti15Mo7Zr, (b) Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si, (c) Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, and (d) Ti15Mo7Zr1Si samples.
Figure 1. Optical microstructure after Kroll reagent etching for (a) Ti15Mo7Zr, (b) Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si, (c) Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, and (d) Ti15Mo7Zr1Si samples.
Materials 16 04906 g001
Figure 2. Corrosion potential curves for Ti15Mo7Zr, Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si, Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si alloys after 24 h’ immersion.
Figure 2. Corrosion potential curves for Ti15Mo7Zr, Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si, Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si, and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si alloys after 24 h’ immersion.
Materials 16 04906 g002
Figure 3. Polarization curves of the four test samples.
Figure 3. Polarization curves of the four test samples.
Materials 16 04906 g003
Figure 4. Nyquist diagrams for Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Figure 4. Nyquist diagrams for Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Materials 16 04906 g004
Figure 5. Bode impedance diagrams for Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Figure 5. Bode impedance diagrams for Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Materials 16 04906 g005
Figure 6. Bode phase graphs for: Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Figure 6. Bode phase graphs for: Ti15Mo7Zr (a), Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si (b), Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si (c), and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si (d) in Ringer’s solution.
Materials 16 04906 g006
Figure 7. Equivalent circuit R(QR)(QR).
Figure 7. Equivalent circuit R(QR)(QR).
Materials 16 04906 g007
Figure 8. Microhardness values for each indentation for the four samples under study under loadings of 5 (a), 25 (b), and 50 (c) gf.
Figure 8. Microhardness values for each indentation for the four samples under study under loadings of 5 (a), 25 (b), and 50 (c) gf.
Materials 16 04906 g008aMaterials 16 04906 g008b
Table 1. Ti15Mo7ZrxSi experimental samples’ chemical composition obtained by EDX (wt %).
Table 1. Ti15Mo7ZrxSi experimental samples’ chemical composition obtained by EDX (wt %).
Alloy Ti (%)Mo (%)Zr (%)Si (%)
Ti15Mo7Zr77.8715.037.10-
Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si77.5215.106.890.49
Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si78.1514.596.530.73
Ti15Mo7Zr1Si77.2415.006.790.97
Table 2. For the four samples dipped in Ringer Grifols solution, open-circuit potential (OCP) measurements were made initially, one hour later, and one day later.
Table 2. For the four samples dipped in Ringer Grifols solution, open-circuit potential (OCP) measurements were made initially, one hour later, and one day later.
AlloyOCP, V vs. SCE
InitialAfter 1 hAfter 1 Day
TiMo15Zr7−0.432−0.337−0.194
TiMo15Zr7Si0.5−0.207−0.227−0.194
TiMo15Zr7Si0.75−0.294−0.284−0.263
TiMo15Zr7Si1−0.546−0.307−0.308
Table 3. Corrosion parameters for all samples tested.
Table 3. Corrosion parameters for all samples tested.
ParametersTi15Mo7ZrTi15Mo7Zr0.5SiTi15Mo7Zr0.75SiTi15Mo7Zr1Si
Ecorr (mV vs. Ref)−305.03−264.59−337.50−445.46
Icorr (nA/cm2)2.002.402.004.00
βc (mV/dec)13.3014.7012.009.60
βa (mV/dec)15.3016.7015.8010.00
Equivalent weight (g/eq)58.1258.0257.9757.92
Density (g/cm3)5.505.495.485.48
Surface (cm2)0.620.311.230.63
Corrosion rate (μm/year)0.110.030.060.22
Rp (Ω·cm2)9.86 × 1056.09 × 1061.2 × 1064.48 × 105
Table 4. Results from the samples’ Bode diagrams under study at Ecorr and at ±300 mV.
Table 4. Results from the samples’ Bode diagrams under study at Ecorr and at ±300 mV.
SamplesPotential (V)Maximum Impedance (Ω)Maximum Phase Angle (°)
−0.49459,795.0076
Ti20Mo7Zr−0.19492,456.5980
−0.10677,547.4479
−0.49499,123.7370
Ti20Mo7Zr0.5Si−0.194164,512.9177
−0.106194,874.1777
−0.46350,019.0679
Ti20Mo7Zr0.75Si−0.16372,085.7082
−0.13781,420.3580
−0.60854,039.7168
Ti20Mo7Zr1Si−0.30885,686.7474
−0.008103,741.0072
Table 5. Equivalent circuit R(QR)(QR) of samples Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si.
Table 5. Equivalent circuit R(QR)(QR) of samples Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si and Ti15Mo7Zr1Si.
SamplePotential (V)Rsol (Ω·cm2)Y01 (S·sn/cm2)n1R1 (Ω·cm2)Y02 (S·sn)n2R2 (Ω·cm2)χ2
Ti15Mo7Zr0.10622.472.04 × 10−511.192.07 × 10−50.901.99 × 1056.55 × 10−4
Ti15Mo7Zr0.5Si0.106 17.047.52 × 10−50.73401.202.55 × 10−50.871.67 × 1066.86 × 10−4
Ti15Mo7Zr0.75Si0.13739.914.55 × 10−40.65620.301.35 × 10−50.932.42 × 1059.63 × 10−4
TiMo15Zr71Si−0.00826.081.48 × 10−40.75100.802.27 × 10−50.811.52 × 1064.44 × 10−4
Table 6. Young’s modulus of the studied alloys.
Table 6. Young’s modulus of the studied alloys.
SampleE Average (GPa)
TiMo15Zr782.4 ± 9.2
TiMo15Zr7Si0.561.5 ± 8.4
TiMo15Zr7Si0.7566.0 ± 8.0
TiMo15Zr7Si173.4 ± 8.2
Table 7. Microhardness values of applied loads of the four samples for 5, 25, and 50 gf.
Table 7. Microhardness values of applied loads of the four samples for 5, 25, and 50 gf.
Load (gf)SamplesAverage (HV)MinMax
5TiMo15Zr7374 ± 16349408
TiMo15Zr7Si0.5357 ± 56247451
TiMo15Zr7Si0.75389 ± 32350437
TiMo15Zr7Si1396 ± 32320437
25TiMo15Zr7348 ± 21317392
TiMo15Zr7Si0.5365 ± 24334403
TiMo15Zr7Si0.75389 ± 13366409
TiMo15Zr7Si1382 ± 50268433
50TiMo15Zr7339 ± 32258372
TiMo15Zr7Si0.5362 ± 63218427
TiMo15Zr7Si0.75395 ± 14379419
TiMo15Zr7Si1382 ± 22345406
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jimenez-Marcos, C.; Mirza-Rosca, J.C.; Baltatu, M.S.; Vizureanu, P. Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys. Materials 2023, 16, 4906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144906

AMA Style

Jimenez-Marcos C, Mirza-Rosca JC, Baltatu MS, Vizureanu P. Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys. Materials. 2023; 16(14):4906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144906

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jimenez-Marcos, Cristina, Julia Claudia Mirza-Rosca, Madalina Simona Baltatu, and Petrica Vizureanu. 2023. "Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys" Materials 16, no. 14: 4906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144906

APA Style

Jimenez-Marcos, C., Mirza-Rosca, J. C., Baltatu, M. S., & Vizureanu, P. (2023). Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys. Materials, 16(14), 4906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144906

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop