Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Selected Titanium Alloy Micro-Texture Parameters on Bacterial Adhesion
Previous Article in Journal
Cost-Effective Thermomechanical Processing of Nanostructured Ferritic Alloys: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Upcycling of Cr-Containing Sulfate Waste into Efficient FeCrO3/Fe2O3 Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 19
10.3390/ma17194764
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption and Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides (NO, N2O) on Disulfide Cluster Complexes of Cobalt and Iron—A Density Functional Study

by
Ellie L. Uzunova
* and
Ivelina M. Georgieva
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(19), 4764; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194764 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 August 2024 / Revised: 9 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 28 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transition Metal Nanomaterials: Synthesis and Photo/Electrocatalytic Performance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The reactivity of nitrogen oxide, NO, as a ligand in complexes with [Fe2-S2] and [Co2-S2] non-planar rhombic cores is examined by density functional theory (DFT). The cobalt-containing nitrosyl complexes are less stable than the iron complexes because the Co-S bonds in the [Co2-S2] core are weakened upon NO coordination. Various positions of NO were examined, including its binding to sulfur centers. The release of NO molecules can be monitored photochemically. The ability of NO to form a (NO)2 dimer provides a favorable route of electrochemical reduction, as protonation significantly stabilizes the dimeric species over the monomers. The quasilinear dimer ONNO, with trans-orientation of oxygen atoms, gains higher stability under protonation and reduction via proton–electron transfer. The first two reduction steps lead to an N2O intermediate, whose reduction is more energy demanding: in the two latter reaction steps the highest energy barrier for Co2S2(CO)6 is 109 kJ mol−1, and for Fe2S2(CO)6, it is 133 kJ mol−1. Again, the presence of favorable light absorption bands allows for a photochemical route to overcome these energy barriers. All elementary steps are exothermic, and the final products are molecular nitrogen and water.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen oxides are produced mainly by vehicles, but also by coal power stations. They are harmful to the environment, contributing to acid rain, and pose a danger to human health [1,2]. There is very limited direct usage of NO and N2O, as is the case with CO2. NO and N2O find application in medicine, with N2O being used as an anesthetic, while the nitrosyl ligand in diiron–disulfur [Fe2-S2] and dicobalt–disulfur [Co2-S2] complexes proved efficient to deliver NO to targeted cells [3,4,5,6]. The active core [Fe2-S2] is made of natural ferredoxin and hydrogenase enzymes, with the coordination of carbonyl and cyanide ligands [7,8]. Whether coordinated by nitrosyl, or by carbonyl ligands, the [Fe2-S2] and [Co2-S2] complexes possess photo-reactivity [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The chemistry and photochemistry of nitrosyl and carbonyl complexes differ considerably. Up to six carbonyl ligands can be coordinated to a [Fe2-S2] core, but the maximum coordination number for nitrosyl groups is four [3,5,9]. The tetra-nitrosyls are less stable than the corresponding carbonyl complexes, and the cobalt-containing nitrosyls are less stable than their iron analogs [3,5]. In carbonyl complexes, the release of carbonyl ligands is energy-demanding, while in nitrosyl complexes, the NO ligands have smaller binding energies and thus are more easily released. The nitrogen oxide molecule, NO, is more reactive than CO and it forms a dimer, O-N-N-O, in two conformations: with cis-orientation of oxygen atoms and with trans-orientation [10,11,12]. The cis-configuration is the global minimum, though it has a strongly lengthened N-N bond [10]. Experimental studies proved the co-existence of the monomer, NO, and the dimer, (NO)2, in gaseous nitrogen oxide, [11]. Despite the higher reactivity of NO and N2O as compared to CO2, in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx, most often carbon monoxide (CO), or a hydrocarbon, such as propane, is used as a reducing agent over a broad range of catalyst materials: transition metal sulfides [13] and transition metal surfaces [14]. Novel approaches with hydrogen as a reducing agent as an eco-friendly alternative were also proposed [15]. Irrespective of the reducing compound used, N2O always appears as an intermediate product. The direct decomposition of N2O, without a co-reactant, was studied on transition metal oxides [16] and transition metal cation-exchanged zeolites, [17]. Transition metal sulfide complexes, with their powerful redox catalyst capacity, boosted by photo-reactivity, are good candidates for NO electro-photochemical redox catalysts.
The present theoretical study explores the electrocatalytic reduction of NO with the hexacarbonyl complexes Fe2S2(CO)6 and Co2S2(CO)6, already known as water-splitting electro-photocatalysts. The dimer (NO)2 is used as a reactant for the reaction of dissociation to N2 and O2, as it has much higher proton and proton–electron (H+,e−) affinities compared to the monomer NO. The reaction mechanism is followed by transition state theory. As the monomer NO is also present in real conditions, the interaction and coordination of NO to the complexes were also studied. The substitution of CO by NO as a ligand in Fe2S2(CO)6 and Co2S2(CO)6 is examined at different levels of substitution, by one, two, and up to four NO groups, provided that the resulting complexes remain stable. All possible coordination sites for NO are considered, including its binding to a sulfur center. The structures and electron distributions are determined by density functional theory (DFT) and compared to experimental data, where available. The mixed carbonyl–nitrosyl complexes are also studied by time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) to reveal the excitation bands, favoring NO release by these complexes.

2. Materials and Methods

The calculations in the present study are performed with density functional theory methods as implemented in Gaussian 16 [18]. Details on basis sets and methods are presented in Supplementary Materials. In their global minima, Fe2(S2)(CO)6 is diamagnetic, Co2(S2)(CO)6 is antiferromagnetic, and both complexes have a non-planar core with bridging disulfur (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials). Though the two complexes have different magnetic structures, the attachment of proton–electron coupling, [H+,e−], during the path of electrochemical reduction, changes the electronic state of both hexacarbonyl complexes to a doublet state. The nitrogen oxide dimer (NO)2 exists in two isomeric forms: the cis form, with a lengthened N-N bond and the two oxygen atoms on one side; and a quasilinear trans-form, with the two oxygen atoms on different sides of the N-N bond (see Table 1 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). The nitrogen oxide molecule attaches a proton at the N-center, while in N2O, the protons may be attached at both ends. N2O has a higher proton affinity than NO, and the preferred position for protonation is the oxygen atom. The attachment of a proton–electron couple to N2O, however, leads to hydroxyl group dissociation even without the presence of a catalyst. The NO dimer, (NO)2, has a much higher proton affinity and proton–electron affinity, as compared to all other NOx species. The protonation renders the trans-quasilinear isomer ONNO as more stable than the cis-isomer by 42 kJ mol−1, as its proton affinity is much higher. The proton–electron affinity [H+,e−] of ONNO is also higher. These results indicate that the nitrosyl dimer, ONNO, is a good candidate for starting the process of catalytic reduction.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Binding of NO to the Carbonyl Complexes Fe2S2(CO)6 and Co2S2(CO)6

The nitrosyl ligand can bind either directly to the metal cation at the place of one or two carbonyl groups; it can also form an entire nitrosyl complex with a maximum of four nitrosyl groups, Fe2S2(NO)4 and Co2S2(NO)4 as shown in Figure 1, which were synthesized experimentally [3,4,5]. Our calculations indicate that nitrosyl binding to a sulfur site is also possible in the hexacarbonyls (see Figure 1c) though with significantly lower binding energy (Table 2). The binding of nitrosyl groups to dicobalt–disulfide is considerably weaker than the binding to the diiron–disulfide complex, in agreement with experimental results [5]. In the dicobalt–disulfide tetra-nitrosyl complex Co2S2(NO)4, the Co-N bonds are slightly lengthened, by 0.005 Å, as compared to Fe2S2(NO)4, but the Co-S bonds are lengthened more significantly, by 0.149 Å. The coordination of nitrosyl groups in all cases breaks the S-S bond, present in the global minima of the hexacarbonyl complexes. Natural bond orbital analysis (NBO) reveals that the N-O bonds are less polarized than the C-O bonds. The local natural charge on N is +0.342, and −0.152 on O of the nitrosyl, whereas it is +0.815 on C and −0.426 on O of the CO ligand. The nitrosyl groups acquire some spin density of the order 0.3 to 0.4, while the carbonyl groups acquire negligible spin density.
All of the nitrosyl complexes have their most intense light absorption bands in the visible region of the spectrum. In the mixed carbonyl–nitrosyl complexes with the nitrosyl groups coordinating the metal cations, the bands of the diiron–disulfide complex are red-shifted compared to the dicobalt–disulfide complex (Table 3). In the complexes with S-NO bonds, the most intense absorption bands of the dicobalt–disulfide complex become red-shifted to 820 nm. The nitrosyl ligands are weakly bonded, as compared to carbonyl ligands—the release of a carbonyl group from Fe2S2(CO)6 requires 154 kJ mol−1 [20]. The highest energy needed for nitrosyl group release is found in the tetra-nitrosyl of iron Fe2S2(NO)4, at 88.5 kJ mol−1. The excitation band at 535 nm and even the near-IR band at 1057 nm provide enough energy for the release of nitrosyl groups in this stable complex. The bands in the visible region of the spectrum have a dominant Metal-to-Ligand Charge Transfer (MLCT) character, and electron transfer to the nitrosyl ligand occurs.

3.2. Reduction of NO in the Form of Its Dimer, (NO)2

The strong proton affinity of the quasilinear trans-ONNO, 682 kJ mol−1, comparable to the proton affinity of Fe2(S2)(CO)6, 717 kJ mol−1, renders the nitrosyl dimer as a promising reactant for selective electrocatalytic reduction in the following reaction scheme:
M2S2(CO)6 + H+,e− + ONNO ⇒ M2S2(CO)6[ H+,e−] + ONNO ⇒ M2S2(CO)6 + ONNOH∙
M2S2(CO)6 + ONNOH∙ + H+,e− ⇒ M2S2(CO)6[ H+,e−] + ONNOH∙ ⇒ M2S2(CO)6 + N2O + H2O
M2S2(CO)6 + N2O + H+,e− ⇒ M2S2(CO)6[H+,e−] + N2O ⇒ M2S2(CO)6 + N2 + OH∙
M2S2(CO)6 + H+,e− + OH∙ ⇒ M2S2(CO)6[H+,e−][OH∙] ⇒ M2S2(CO)6 +H2O
Steps (1) and (2) lead to N2O, and at this stage, Co2S2(CO)6 and Fe2S2(CO)6 perform equally well, with a small difference in the energy barriers of 10–11 kJ mol−1 (see Figure 2). For the first step of N2O2 hydrogenation, the cobalt complex Co2S2(CO)6 provides a low energy barrier of only 33 kJ mol−1; for the iron complex, the energy barrier is only 11 kJ mol−1 higher, at 44 kJ mol−1. This reaction step is weakly exothermic, at 38 kJ mol−1 for the cobalt complex, and at 36 kJ mol−1 for the iron complex—the values are again very close. The reaction barrier of the second elementary step (2) to the formation of N2O and release of a water molecule is about twice as high for the cobalt complex (68 kJ mol−1) as compared to the first step. For this step, the iron complex provides a similar, slightly lower energy barrier.
The subsequent reduction of N2O proceeds via elementary steps (3) and (4) and yields molecular nitrogen and water. For reaction step 3, the Co2S2(CO)6 complex provides a much lower energy barrier of 77 kJ mol−1 vs. 133 kJ mol−1 for the Fe2S2(CO)6 complex (Figure 3). In this step, molecular nitrogen is formed and an OH∙ group is released, which becomes attached to the disulfide core of the complexes. Step (3) is thus strongly exothermic, as it leads to the release of molecular nitrogen, together with the formation of a hydroxyl-bonded disulfide complex (Figure 4). Only Fe2S2(CO)6 provides two alternative locations of the OH∙ group: a midway position, attached to both iron centers symmetrically via the oxygen atom of OH∙; and coordination to a sulfur atom, with the formation of a relatively short S-O bond (Figure 4b). In the Co2S2(CO)6 complex, the OH∙ group is allowed to bind to the sulfur center only; see Figure S7 in Supplementary Materials. The final step (4) of the ONNO reduction reaction is the release of a water molecule to restore the catalyst center. In this step, the diiron–disulfide complex has a lower energy barrier of 78 kJ mol−1, which is possibly due to the flexibility of the OH∙ group binding. The energy barrier of the dicobalt–disulfide complex is a bit higher, at 109 kJ mol−1.
The reaction route is exothermic in all four elementary steps. Transition states 1 and 2 are closer to the configuration of the initial reactants than to the reaction products. TS3 is about midway in the route to the final products in this step: the release of the N2 and OH∙ groups (see Figure 5). For the cobalt complex, N2O is linear in TS3 and is closer to the initial state, while the iron complex reaches TS3 upon bending the N2O molecule, resulting in a much higher energy barrier.
Though the highly exothermic elementary steps may compensate for the subsequent high energy barriers, the possibility of performing a photocatalyzed reaction was also examined in Table 3. The OH• group containing complexes possess strongly intense bands in the visible spectral region, particularly for isomers with S-OH bonds, and they are thus capable of providing the necessary energy for the barrier in step (4) and restoring the catalyst to its initial state.

4. Conclusions

The reactivity of nitrogen oxide, NO, was examined as a ligand in carbonyl complexes with [Fe2-S2] and [Co2-S2] non-planar rhombic cores. By increasing the number of nitrosyl ligands, the M-N bond is strengthened, particularly in the iron complexes, but the release of NO can be achieved photochemically. The dimerization of NO opens up a possibility for a low-energy pathway of electrocatalytic reduction. The greatest advantage over other reaction schemes is that there is no oxygen abstraction, but water formation occurs in the elementary steps. The highest energy barriers are reached in the reduction of N2O, which appears as an intermediate product, but for Co2S2(CO)6, the highest energy barrier is 109 kJ mol−1, and for Fe2S2(CO)6, it is 133 kJ mol−1. The presence of favorable light absorption bands in the visible spectrum provides an opportunity for photocatalyzed electrochemical reduction.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17194764/s1: Computational details: structures of complexes and reactants; Figures S1–S3; UV-VIS spectra; Figures S4–S6: Transition state structures and intermediates; Figures S7 and S8: Transition state structures and their coordinates. References [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.L.U. and I.M.G.; methodology, E.L.U. and I.M.G.; validation, E.L.U. and I.M.G.; investigation, E.L.U. and I.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.U.; writing—review and editing, E.L.U. and I.M.G.; visualization, E.L.U. and I.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Bulgarian National Science Fund of the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, Grant KII-06-H59/6 (2021), project (PhotoMetalMod”). This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund within the Operational Program “Science and Education for Smart Growth 2014–2020” under the Project CoE “National Center of Mechatronics and Clean Technologies” (BG05M2OP001-1.001-0008) (for supplying a license for the program package Gaussian 16). The authors also acknowledge the provided access to the infrastructure, purchased under the National Roadmap for RI, and financially coordinated by the MES of the Republic of Bulgaria (Grant No D01-325/01.12.2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Leclercq, B.; Kluza, J.; Antherieu, S.; Sotty, J.; Alleman, L.Y.; Perdrix, E.; Loyens, A.; Coddeville, P.; Lo Guidice, J.-M.; Marchetti, P.; et al. Air pollution-derived PM2.5 impairs mitochondrial function in healthy and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseased human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 1434–1449. Available online: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0169-4332(21)01770-0/h0010 (accessed on 24 August 2024). [CrossRef]
  2. Anenberg, S.C.; Miller, J.; Minjares, R.; Du, L.I.; Henze, D.K.; Lacey, F.; Malley, C.S.; Emberson, L.; Franco, V.; Klimont, Z.; et al. Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets. Nature 2017, 545, 467–471. Available online: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0169-4332(21)01770-0/h0005 (accessed on 24 August 2024). [CrossRef]
  3. Bourassa, J.; DeGraff, W.; Kudo, S.; Wink, D.A.; Mitchell, J.B.; Ford, P.C. Photochemistry of Roussin’s Red Salt, Na2[Fe2S2(NO)4], and of Roussin’s Black Salt, NH4[Fe4S3(NO)7]. In Situ Nitric Oxide Generation to Sensitize γ-Radiation Induced Cell Death. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2853–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Harrop, T.C.; Tonzetich, Z.J.; Reisner, E.; Lippard, S.J. Reactions of Synthetic [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] Clusters with Nitric Oxide and Nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15602–15610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bitterwolf, T.E.; Pal, P. Synthesis of the cobalt analogues of Roussin’s red salt esters Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hayton, T.W.; Legzdins, P.; Sharp, W.B. Coordination and Organometallic Chemistry of Metal-NO Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 935–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tard, C.; Pickett, C.J. Structural and Functional Analogues of the Active Sites of the [Fe]-, [NiFe]-, and [FeFe]-Hydrogenases. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Appel, A.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Bocarsly, A.B.; Dobbek, H.; DuBois, D.L.; Dupuis, M.; Ferry, J.G.; Fujita, E.; Hille, R.; Kenis, P.J.A.; et al. Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO2 Fixation. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nann, T.; Ibrahim, S.K.; Woi, P.-M.; Xu, S.; Ziegler, J.; Pickett, C.J. Water Splitting by Visible Light: A Nanophotocathode for Hydrogen Production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harcourt, R.D. The origin of the long N-N bond in N2O2: An ab initio valence bond study. J. Mol. Str.: THEOCHEM 1990, 206, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dkhissi, A.; Soulard, P.; Perrin, A.; Lacome, N. “The NO Dimer”. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1997, 183, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. East, A.L.L. The 16 valence electronic states of nitric oxide dimer. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 2185–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esrafili, M.D.; Janebi, H.; Mousavian, P. Single Al atom anchored on defective MoS2: An efficient catalytic site for reduction of greenhouse N2O gas by CO or C2H4 molecules. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 569, 151001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matsushima, T.; Kokalj, A. N2 emission in steady-state N2O + CO and NO + CO reactions on Ir(110) by means of angle-resolved desorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 414, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Farhan, S.M.; Pan, W.; Zhijian, C.; JianJun, Y. Innovative catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with H2: A systematic review. Fuel 2024, 355, 129364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kocía, K.; Relia, M.; Troppováa, I.; Sihor, M.; Kupkovác, J.; Kustrowski, P.; Prausa, P. Photocatalytic decomposition of N2O over TiO2/g-C3N4 photocatalysts heterojunction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1685–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ryder, J.A.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Bell, A.T. Density Functional Theory Study of Nitrous Oxide Decomposition over Fe- and Co-ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7059–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuo, S.C.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Ross, S.K.; Klemm, R.B.; Johnson, R.D.; Monks, P.S.; Thorn, R.P.; Stief, L.J. Discharge flow-photoionization mass spectrometric study of HNO: Phtoionization efficiency spectrum and ionization energy and proton affinity of NO. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hunter, E.P.; Lias, S.G. Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1998, 27, 413–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Uzunova, E.L.; Mikosch, H. Electronic, magnetic structure and water splitting reactivity of the iron-sulfur dimers and their hexacarbonyl complexes: A density functional study. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 044307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. IV. A new dynamical correlation functional and implications for exact-exchange mixing. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miehlich, B.; Savin, A.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of Becke and Lee, Yang and Parr. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wachters, A.J.H. Gaussian basis set for molecular wavefunctions containing third-row atoms. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hay, P.J. Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. The representation of 3d orbitals in transition-metal atoms. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raghavachari, K.; Trucks, G.W. Highly correlated systems. Excitation energies of first row transition metals Sc–Cu. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hay, P.J.; Wadt, W.R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for the transition metal atoms Sc to Hg. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Halgren, T.A.; Lipscomb, W.N. The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 49, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, C.; Ayala, P.Y.; Schlegel, H.B.; Frisch, M.J. Using redundant internal coordinates to optimize equilibrium geometries and transition states. J. Comp. Chem. 1996, 17, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fukui, K. The path of chemical reactions-the IRC approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hratchian, H.P.; Schlegel, H.B. Accurate reaction paths using a Hessian based predictor–corrector integrator. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Stability analysis for solutions of the closed shell Kohn–Sham equation. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 9047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Treatment of electronic excitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Adiabatic time-dependent density functional methods for excited state properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 7433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yanai, T.; Tew, D.; Handy, N. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reed, A.E.; Curtiss, L.A.; Weinhold, F. Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Weinhold, F.; Carpenter, J.E. The Structure of Small Molecules and Ions; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comp. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 04764 g001
Figure 1. Mixed nitrosyl–carbonyl and pure nitrosyl complexes: (a) Co2S2(CO)5(NO); (b) Co2S2(CO)4(NO)2; (c) Co2S2(NO)4; and (d) Co2S2(CO)6(NO) with S-NO bond. Legend: cobalt cations are light-blue large balls, sulfur atoms are yellow, nitrogen is dark blue, oxygen is red, and carbon is gray. N-O bond lengths are marked red, and C-O bond lengths are black. The M-S bonds, M-N bonds, and S-N bonds are described in Table 2. The corresponding Fe complexes are presented in Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1. Mixed nitrosyl–carbonyl and pure nitrosyl complexes: (a) Co2S2(CO)5(NO); (b) Co2S2(CO)4(NO)2; (c) Co2S2(NO)4; and (d) Co2S2(CO)6(NO) with S-NO bond. Legend: cobalt cations are light-blue large balls, sulfur atoms are yellow, nitrogen is dark blue, oxygen is red, and carbon is gray. N-O bond lengths are marked red, and C-O bond lengths are black. The M-S bonds, M-N bonds, and S-N bonds are described in Table 2. The corresponding Fe complexes are presented in Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials.
Materials 17 04764 g001
Materials 17 04764 g002
Figure 2. The reaction path of N2O2 dissociation to N2O on Co2S2(CO)6 and Fe2S2(CO)6. TS1 denotes the energy barrier of reaction step (1) and TS2is the energy barrier of elementary step (2). RC—reaction coordinate.
Figure 2. The reaction path of N2O2 dissociation to N2O on Co2S2(CO)6 and Fe2S2(CO)6. TS1 denotes the energy barrier of reaction step (1) and TS2is the energy barrier of elementary step (2). RC—reaction coordinate.
Materials 17 04764 g002
Materials 17 04764 g003
Figure 3. The reaction path of N2O dissociation to N2 and H2O on hexacarbonyl complexes with Co2S2 and Fe2S2 core. TS3 denotes the energy barrier to reaction step (3) and TS4 is the energy barrier to elementary step (4). RC—reaction coordinate.
Figure 3. The reaction path of N2O dissociation to N2 and H2O on hexacarbonyl complexes with Co2S2 and Fe2S2 core. TS3 denotes the energy barrier to reaction step (3) and TS4 is the energy barrier to elementary step (4). RC—reaction coordinate.
Materials 17 04764 g003
Materials 17 04764 g004
Figure 4. The binding of the OH∙ group to Fe2S2(CO)6. (a) Midway position of the OH∙ group bonded directly to the Fe centers; (b) OH∙ group bonded to the sulfur atom. Configuration (a) is the global minimum, found as 30 kJ mol−1 below configuration (b). Iron cations are large aqua-blue balls, sulfur atoms are yellow, nitrogen is dark blue, oxygen is red, and carbon is gray. The cobalt complex is presented in Figure S7 in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 4. The binding of the OH∙ group to Fe2S2(CO)6. (a) Midway position of the OH∙ group bonded directly to the Fe centers; (b) OH∙ group bonded to the sulfur atom. Configuration (a) is the global minimum, found as 30 kJ mol−1 below configuration (b). Iron cations are large aqua-blue balls, sulfur atoms are yellow, nitrogen is dark blue, oxygen is red, and carbon is gray. The cobalt complex is presented in Figure S7 in Supplementary Materials.
Materials 17 04764 g004
Materials 17 04764 g005
Figure 5. Transition state structures along the reaction path of ONNO reduction for the [Co2-S2] complex. TS1 reveals the first reduction step of ONNO. TS2 corresponds to the reduction of ONNOH∙. TS3 refers to the reduction of N2O. Legend is the same as Figure 1. The transition states TS1, TS2, TS3, and TS4 (water molecule release) for the [Fe2-S2] complex are presented as Supplementary Materials in Figure S7, and their coordinates are included.
Figure 5. Transition state structures along the reaction path of ONNO reduction for the [Co2-S2] complex. TS1 reveals the first reduction step of ONNO. TS2 corresponds to the reduction of ONNOH∙. TS3 refers to the reduction of N2O. Legend is the same as Figure 1. The transition states TS1, TS2, TS3, and TS4 (water molecule release) for the [Fe2-S2] complex are presented as Supplementary Materials in Figure S7, and their coordinates are included.
Materials 17 04764 g005
Table 1. Bond lengths, proton affinities (PAs), and H+,e− affinities of nitrogen oxides: NO, N2O, and the NO dimer, N2O2.
Table 1. Bond lengths, proton affinities (PAs), and H+,e− affinities of nitrogen oxides: NO, N2O, and the NO dimer, N2O2.
MoleculeBond Length N-O, ÅBond Length N-N, ÅPA, kJ mol−1H+,e− Affinity, kJ mol−1
NO1.1456 529233
Exp, Ref. [18]1.1508 531
N2O1.18401.1210554 at N
582 at O
Exp, Ref. [19]1.18601.1260549.8 at N
575.2 at O
(NO)2 cis, N2O21.14711.9730638286
(NO)2 trans-ONNO1.21181.1564682311
Table 2. Selected bond lengths in mixed carbonyl–nitrosyl complexes with M2S2 core (M = Fe, Co) and nitrosyl group binding energies (BEs) at different sites.
Table 2. Selected bond lengths in mixed carbonyl–nitrosyl complexes with M2S2 core (M = Fe, Co) and nitrosyl group binding energies (BEs) at different sites.
MoleculeBond Length M-S, ÅBond Length M-N, ÅBond Length S-N, ÅNO BE, kJ mol−1
Co2S2(CO)5(NO)
Co-NO bond		2.2361.964 17.4
Co2S2(CO)4(NO)2
2 Co-NO bonds		2.2451.821 30.1
Co2S2(NO)42.3171.641 76.1
Co2S2(CO)6(NO)
S-NO bond		2.297; 2.373 1.86422.4
Fe2S2(CO)5(NO)
Fe-NO bond		2.2361.726 50.4
Fe2S2(CO)4(NO)2
2 Fe-NO bonds		2.2751.722 58.6
Fe2S2(NO)42.1681.636 88.5
Fe2S2(CO)6(NO)
S-NO bond		2.231; 2.273 1.93932.1
Table 3. TD-DFT results for nitrosyl and hydroxyl complexes. The most intense lines are listed. UV-VIS spectra are illustrated in Supplementary Materials in Figures S4–S6.
Table 3. TD-DFT results for nitrosyl and hydroxyl complexes. The most intense lines are listed. UV-VIS spectra are illustrated in Supplementary Materials in Figures S4–S6.
Complex, BondsLight Absorption, nmOscillator Strength
Co2S2(CO)5(NO)
Co-NO bond		6630.0025
Fe2S2(CO)5(NO)
Fe-NO bond		7390.0065
Co2S2(NO)45240.0174
Fe2S2(NO)4535
1057		0.0011
0.0087
Co2S2(CO)6(NO)
S-NO bond		8200.0133
Fe2S2(CO)6(NO)
S-NO bond		7390.0065
Co2S2(CO)6(OH)
S-OH bond		8740.0282
Fe2S2(CO)6(OH)
S-OH bond		9650.0205
Fe2S2(CO)6(OH)
Fe-OH-Fe bond		6790.0091
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uzunova, E.L.; Georgieva, I.M. Adsorption and Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides (NO, N2O) on Disulfide Cluster Complexes of Cobalt and Iron—A Density Functional Study. Materials 2024, 17, 4764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194764

AMA Style

Uzunova EL, Georgieva IM. Adsorption and Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides (NO, N2O) on Disulfide Cluster Complexes of Cobalt and Iron—A Density Functional Study. Materials. 2024; 17(19):4764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uzunova, Ellie L., and Ivelina M. Georgieva. 2024. "Adsorption and Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides (NO, N2O) on Disulfide Cluster Complexes of Cobalt and Iron—A Density Functional Study" Materials 17, no. 19: 4764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop