Next Article in Journal
Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Corporate Financialization: Evidence from China
Next Article in Special Issue
E-business, Information Systems Management and Sustainable Strategy Development in the Digital Era
Previous Article in Journal
Supply Chain Resilience in Reality VUCA—An International Delphi Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of Smart City Infrastructure Threat Modelling Methodologies: A Bayesian Focused Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

IT Strategy in the Hotel Industry in the Digital Era

Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10705; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710705
by Martin Wynn 1,* and Peter Jones 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10705; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710705
Submission received: 3 August 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 28 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article explores and assesses the options and dilemmas facing the hotel industry in selecting and implementing information systems and digital technologies as part of an evolving IT strategy.

The choice of topics is relevant and the research contributes to the development of the hotel industry.

The presentation of results is clear and understandable. The conclusions and findings are based on the results of the research.  

Author Response

Please see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript has innovative and interesting topic which explores and assesses the options and dilemmas facing the hotel industry in selecting and implementing information systems and digital technologies as part of an evolving IT strategy. Meanwhile it is not congruent with the mission, aims and scope of Sustainbality journal. 

 

In Introduction section I suggest the authors discuss more about the inconsistent findings reported in previous researches and how they will go to fill the gaps found on the past literature.

 Literature review in the paper is very weak and must be improved with a clear focus on theme of the paper.

Methodology needs to be rewritten in a much clearer way – it is not entirely clear how the authors pursue the research aims of the research. Materials and methods used in the paper should be clearly presented in a logical format in order to help a reader to grasp the following Results section. This part needs to be detailed, broadened to clearly show how the research was carried out. 

The main weaknesses of the reviewed paper is in absense of scientific novelty. We learn little that is new or novel here. There is no convincing concluding debate regarding the unique contribution of the reviewed paper.

Author Response

Please see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed all the given comments and in the current form it is ready to be published.

Back to TopTop