Next Article in Journal
Tomato Comprehensive Quality Evaluation and Irrigation Mode Optimization with Biogas Slurry Based on the Combined Evaluation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Ion Exchange Resins to Reduce Boron in Desalinated Seawater for Irrigation in Southeastern Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Assessment of Region-Based CNNs for Detecting Monocot/Dicot Weeds in Dense Field Environments
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Site-Specific Management Zones Delineation Based on Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity in Two Contrasting Fields of Southern Brazil

Agronomy 2022, 12(6), 1390; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061390
by Eduardo Leonel Bottega 1,*, José Lucas Safanelli 2,3, Mojtaba Zeraatpisheh 4,5, Telmo Jorge Carneiro Amado 6,†, Daniel Marçal de Queiroz 7 and Zanandra Boff de Oliveira 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2022, 12(6), 1390; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061390
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Revised: 2 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 June 2022 / Published: 9 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Agriculture Digitization in Cropping Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear colleagues
I studied your paper
First of all, I must say that I find your work useful
The methods described are clearly a trend in global agriculture and have not only a local but a global impact.

I would like to make a few small remarks.

it would be good to add a map / picture of the experimental site to the methodology for a better idea.

on the contrary, the conductivity equations may be slightly redundant, but I do not insist on an adjustment.

within the results, especially the tables and graphs in Figure 5, it would be appropriate to highlight the statistically significant differences.

 

I consider the discussion and conclusion to be adequate.
I wish you much success in your future work.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1;
We appreciate your valuable contribution in making our study even more interesting.
All your suggestions for improvement were incorporated into the manuscript.
Attached we send a file with point-to-point responses.
Thanks.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. In terms of correct style of chapter headings/ references/ tables/ figure /units /decimals which are occasionally wrong formatted the authors can consult: journal recommendations for authors.

2. There are some type of typos in your MS. Please double check you text and correct them all.

3. The list of references should be standardized. Authors can read published papers by the journal in order to understand and follow the style.

4. Please add the specific problems and challenges of the findings (or what should be done in future) in the conclusion.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1;
We appreciate your valuable contribution in making our study even more interesting.
All your suggestions for improvement were incorporated into the manuscript.
Attached we send a file with point-to-point responses.
Thanks.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop