Next Article in Journal
Agricultural Diffuse Pollution and the EU Water Framework Directive: Problems and Progress in Governance
Previous Article in Journal
Bank Protection Structures along the Brahmaputra-Jamuna River, a Study of Flow Slides
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Runoff-Sediment Cointegration and Uncertainty Relations at Different Temporal Scales in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River, China

Water 2020, 12(9), 2589; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092589
by Xiujie Wang, Dandan Li, Ximin Yuan *, Xiling Qi and Pengfei Zhang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Water 2020, 12(9), 2589; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092589
Submission received: 28 July 2020 / Revised: 11 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Water Erosion and Sediment Transport)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript submitted for review presents statistical modeling of equilibrium relationship among sediment load, suspended sediment concentration and runoff series of Toudaoguai, Longmen, Tongguan, Huayuankou stations in the middle Yellow River basin (China) at different temporal scales.

The authors used data total 285 floods 1960 to 2015, mostly collected from the Yellow River Water Conservancy Commission.

In Chapter 1 and 2, Introduction and Study area and Materials, the authors explain the topic by citing literature and present the analyzed area and its conditions. 38 references are cited here. Reviewer has no comments.

In Chapter 3, the authors present the Methods. Cointegration is presented very shortly. What is Johansen test? This is linear cointegration. For the nonlinear cointegration was used Wavelet-neural network and typical function. For runoff-sediment relationship, a linear function was used to relate the intensity of sediment to its concentration. In Equation 3, it should probably be SSC, not C.

Chapter 4 presents a results and extensive discussion of the conducted research. Too few references to literature!!! Such a discussion must be supported by literature. It needs to be improved!!!  Enlarge figures 2-7.

In chapter 5, the authors present summary main goals of conclusion. Properly. The reviewer has no comments.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached review.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All comments were taken into account

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Several minor grammar/editorial changes are recommended. See review provided.

Comments for author File: Comments.PDF

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop