1. Introduction
Convex functions play an important role in many areas of mathematics. They are important for the study of optimization problems, where they are distinguished by a number of convenient properties. Classical convex function have several extensions. Some concepts in this regard include Pseudo-convex functions [
1], E-convex functions [
2],
s-convex functions [
3], and
m-convex functions [
4]. Among others, the present study is restricted to s-convex functions. W. Orlicz [
5] introduced
s-convexity in the first sense in 1961. In 1978, Breckner [
6] provided a slight modification to it, which is known as
s-convexity in the second sense. H. Hudzik and L. Maligranda discussed both of these two kinds of
s-convexity in [
3]. They showed that
s-convexity in the second sense (
) is stronger than
s-convexity in the original sense (first sense) whenever
.
Quantum calculus, which is known as
q-calculus (where
q stands for quantum), was introduced by Euler and Jacobi before F.H. Jackson in the early twentieth century. Numerous mathematical fields, including number theory, combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, fundamental hyper-geometric functions, and other sciences, including physics and the theory of relativity, have used it successfully [
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12].
Da Cruz et al. [
13] introduced the concept of
q-symmetric variational calculus. The
q-symmetric derivative has essential qualities for the
q-exponential function. Many researchers have applied the idea of
q-symmetric calculus from different perspectives and have established certain subclasses of analytic functions, geometric functions, and, most particulary, quantum mechanics [
14,
15,
16].
In many practical problems, it is necessary to restrict one quantity from another. For this, classical inequalities, including Hermite-Hadamard-, Jensen-, and Ostrowski-type inequalities are quite helpful. Many researchers have demonstrated various inequalities with error estimates of the functions of bounded variation, Lipschitzian, monotone, absolutely continuous, and convex functions, as well as
n-times differentiable mappings [
17,
18,
19,
20]. Additionally, the research on
q-integral inequalities is quite significant, and several researchers have explored integral inequalities in depth, whether in classical analysis or quantum mechanics. More precisely, some inequalities involving convexity or s-convexity [
20,
21,
22] and
q-integrals are studied in [
7,
18,
23,
24,
25,
26].
The aim of the present work is the study of some Ostrowski and Hermite–Hadamard inequalities in the framework of
q-symmetric calculus. The paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, convex functions,
s-convex functions (in the second sense), and
q-symmetric derivatives and integrals are recalled along with their properties. In
Section 3, Hölder, Minkowski, and power mean inequalities are studied with the help of
q-symmetric integrals. In
Section 4, some Ostrowski-type inequalities are proved with the help of a
q-symmetric analogue of the Montgomery identity together with the inequalities proved in
Section 3.
Section 5 deals with
q-symmetric Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for convex as well as for
s-convex functions (in the second sense). A summary of the findings is discussed in
Section 6.
2. Preliminaries
Some basic concepts of convexity, s-convexity, and q-symmetric derivatives and integrals are recalled in this section, which have been used in rest of the paper.
A function
is said to be mid-point convex function if
holds for all
.
Assume that
is said to be a convex function if
holds for all
and
.
By choosing
in (
2), one obtains (
1).
The definition of an s-convex function in the second sense is defined by Breckner [
6] as:
A function
is said to be an
s-convex function in the second sense if
for each
where
and
. Moreover, by choosing
(
3) defines s-convexity in the first sense [
5]. By taking
in (
3), one obtains (
2). Therefore, all convex functions are s-convex functions.
The following definitions and related properties are recalled from [
9].
The
q-derivative measures the rate of change with respect to a dilatation of its argument by a factor
q. It is clear that if
is differentiable at
, then
For a continuous mapping
, the
q-derivative at
is defined by
Let
be a continuous function. Then, the
q-symmetric derivative at
is
The
q-symmetric analogue of power
, defined in [
15], is
and for the real parameter
, the
q-real number
is defined by
When
n is a positive integer, we have
For
, we have the following evaluation:
Let and be q-symmetric differentiable functions on . Let , and ; then,
- (i)
if is constant on ;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
;
- (iv)
if .
Suppose that
is a continuous function. Then, the
q-symmetric definite integral on
is defined as
for
.
Let
be continuous mappings
with
; then,
4. -Symmetric Ostrowski-Type Inequalities
In this section, some Ostrowski-type inequalities are extended for those functions whose derivatives are either convex or s-convex in the second sense. For this purpose, first, we have to establish the following Montgomery identity for q-symmetric integrals.
Lemma 1 (
q-Symmetric Montgomery identity).
Let be a q-symmetric differentiable function on and for . If . Then, the following q-symmetric integral equality is valid: Proof. Using the definition of a
q-symmetric derivative, one can write
First, we simplify the integrals
and
as follows:
In a similar fashion, we have
Substituting (
22) and (
23) in (
21), we have
Hence, (
24) completes the proof. □
Remark 1. Lemma 1 extends Lemma 3.1 of [25]. If we choose in Lemma 1, it becomes Lemma 1 of [21]. Now, we are ready to construct the following Ostrowski-type inequalities with the help of Lemma 1.
Theorem 4. Suppose thatis q-symmetric differentiable for and
, in which for . If is a convex function on for some and , then the following q-symmetric integral inequality is obtained:for each . Proof. Taking the modulus on both sides of (
26), we have
Using the convexity of
q-symmetric derivatives, we obtain
□
Remark 2. Theorem 4 extends Theorem 3.1 of [25]. Example 1. Set , , , , and in Theorem 4 to obtain the following estimate: However, using the same substitution, Theorem 3.1 of [25] yields Clearly,
Figure 1a shows that Inequality (
27) gives a better approximation than Inequality (
28).
Theorem 5. Assume that is a q-symmetric differentiable mapping on , and , where , and . If is a convex function on for some static , , , and , then the following inequality is valid:for each
.
Proof. Using the
q-symmetric Hölder inequality (
12) on the right-hand side, we have
From (
16), the right-hand side of (
30) satisfies the following:
Hence, we obtain the result. □
Remark 3. Theorem 5 extends Theorem 3.2 of [25]. Example 2. Set , , , , , and in Theorem 5 to obtain the following: Using the same substitution in Theorem 3.2 of [25] yields The validity and a comparison of (
31) and (
32) can be seen in
Figure 1b.
Theorem 6. Assume that is a q-symmetric differentiable function on and for with . If the absolute value of is s-convex in the second sense on and if a static and are bounded by , then for the following inequality is valid: Proof. Since
is an s-convex function in the second sense on
, therefore, using (
20), we have the following:
Since
and
therefore, by substituting (
35) and (
36) in (
34), we have
□
Remark 4. Theorem 6 is an extension of Theorem 15 of [18]. If we set in Inequality (33), then Theorem 6 leads to Theorem 2 of [21]. If we set in Inequality (33), then it becomes Inequality (25) of Theorem 4. Example 3. If we set , , , , , and in Theorem 6, we have the following estimate: However, using the same substitution, Theorem 15 of [18] yields Figure 2a shows that new estimates are better than existing ones.
Theorem 7. Let be a q-symmetric differentiable function on and , in which for . If is an s-convex function in the second sense on for a unique , and if , , and is bounded by , then the inequalityis valid for each . Proof. From (
20) and using the
q-symmetric analogue of the Hölder inequality, we obtain
From (
12), the right-hand side of the above inequality becomes
Additionally, using the definition of an s-convexity,
In a similar fashion, we have
Substituting (
41) and (
42) in (
40), we obtain
□
Remark 5. Theorem 7 extends Theorem 16 of [18]. For , Theorem 7 reduces to Theorem 3 of [21]. For , then Inequality (39) reduces to Inequality (29) of Theorem 5. Example 4. Consider , , , , s = 1, m = 2, n = 1, and in Theorem 7 to obtain the following: Using the above substitution in Theorem 16 of [18], we have Theorem 8. Let be a q-symmetric differentiable mapping on with , in which for . If the absolute value of is an s-convex mapping in the second sense on , some unique , , and , thenholds for each . Proof. Using (
20) and using the
q-symmetric-analogue of the power mean inequality, we obtain
We use the definition of s-convexity in the second sense and (
16) to obtain
and
We use (
47) and (
48) in (
46) to obtain
Since
and
therefore, (
49) becomes
□
Remark 6. Theorem 8 extends Theorem 17 of [18]. If we set , then Theorem 8 becomes Theorem 4 of [21]. 5. -Symmetric Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities
In this section, we present q-symmetric analogues of Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for convex as well as for s-convex functions.
Theorem 9. Suppose that is a q-symmetric differentiable function, is continuous on , and . Then, we have Proof. Using the definition of convexity, we have
Taking the
q-symmetric integral of (
51) with respect to
, where
, we have
Using the
q-symmetric Jackson’s integral [
15], we obtain
Equations (
54) and (
55) imply
Using the definition of mid-convexity, we have
Integrating from 0 to 1 with respect to
, we obtain
From (
56) and (
57), we obtain the desired inequalities. □
Remark 7. Theorem 9 is a suitable extension of Theorem 3.2 of [26]. If we put , then inequalities (50) are reduced to classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities. Example 5. Choose , , , and in Theorem 9 to obtain the following: Remark 8. Note that it is shown in Example 5 of [7] that the left-hand inequality of Theorem 3.2 in [26] does not hold for From Example 5, it is clear that q-symmetric analogues (both left and right) of Hermite–Hadamard inequalities are valid for the functions and , which are chosen in Example 5 of [7]. In Example 5, the right-hand inequality becomes an equality for the function and . Now, by choosing we have the following inequalities:
Example 6. Let us set , , , and in Theorem 5.1 to obtain the following: Theorem 10. Let be an s-convex mapping in the second sense, for which , and let , and . If , then the following inequality is valid: Proof. From the definition of s-convex functions,
Substituting (
60) and (
61) in (
59), we have
Let us consider
and substitute in
to obtain
This gives
Inequality (
62) together with Inequality (
63) complete the proof. □
Remark 9. Theorem 10 is an extension of Theorem 15 of [18]. If we set in (58), we obtain Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for the s-convex function given in [22]. Example 7. We can set , , , and in Theorem 10 to obtain Figure 3a,b is a graphical representation of Example 6 and Example 7, respectively.
6. Conclusions
In this paper,
q-symmetric Hölder, Minkowski, and power mean inequalities and the
q-symmetric Montgomery identity are proved, which are keys to finding
q-symmetric Ostrowski-type inequalities. Some Hermite–Hadamar-type inequalities are also established in this paper. The present results extend the Montgomery identities of [
21,
25]. Ostrowski-type inequalities for convex functions are proved in [
18,
25], and Ostrowski-type inequalities for
s-convex functions are given in [
18,
21]. Hermite–Hadamar-type inequalities for convex functions are provided in [
18,
26], and Hermite–Hadamar-type inequalities for
s-convex functions are provided in [
18,
22]. Several examples are included to show that the present results give better approximations in comparison with existing results in the literature. It can be seen from graphs that the differences in the left- and right-hand sides of the present inequalities are smaller than the differences in the left- and right-hand sides of the existing inequalities.