Next Article in Journal
Modulation of Immunity, Antioxidant Status, Performance, Blood Hematology, and Intestinal Histomorphometry in Response to Dietary Inclusion of Origanum majorana in Domestic Pigeons’ Diet
Previous Article in Journal
The Unexpected Identity of Tympanis vagabunda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) for Rice Pre-Breeding and Improvement: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

De Novo Hybrid Assembled Draft Genome of Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari Reveals Key Enzymes Involved in Phytosterol Biosynthesis

1
CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow 226001, India
2
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(3), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030662
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 7 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Advances in Plant Genomics: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Genome sequence and identification of specific genes involved in the targeted secondary metabolite biosynthesis are two essential requirements for the improvement of any medicinal plant. Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari (family: Burseraceae), a medicinal plant native to Western India, produces a phytosterol guggulsterone, which is useful for treating atherosclerosis, arthritis, high cholesterol, acne, and obesity. For enhanced guggulsterone yield, key genes involved in its biosynthesis pathway need to be predicted, for which the genome sequence of the species is a pre-requisite. Therefore, we assembled the first-ever hybrid draft genome of C. wightii with a genome size of 1.03 Gb and 107,221 contigs using Illumina and PacBio platforms. The N50 and L50 values in this assembled genome were ~74 Kb and 3486 bp, respectively with a guanine–cytosine (GC) content of 35.6% and 98.7%. The Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Ortholog (BUSCO) value indicated good integrity of assembly. Analysis predicted the presence of 31,187 genes and 342.35 Mb repeat elements in the genome. The comparative genome analysis of C. wightii with relevant orthogroups predicted a few key genes associated with phytosterol biosynthesis and secondary metabolism pathways. The assembled draft genome and the predicted genes should help the future variety development program with improved guggulsterone contents in C. wightii.

1. Introduction

Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari (family: Burseraceae) is a medicinally important plant, and is native to arid regions of Western India. It is also found in Bangladesh, Pakistan, China and tropical Africa [1]. Guggulsterone, a phytosterol derived from the resin of C. wightii, is being used in Ayurveda to treat obesity, arthritis, and hyperlipidemia [2,3]. It has also been shown to have nutraceutical, anti-arthritic, anti-inflammatory and anti-lipid properties [4]. Moreover, it also has an anticancer effect on a range of human tumor cell types [5]. The unsustainable extraction of resin from trees has resulted in a loss of its natural populations, and the species is now critically endangered [6,7].
Although many studies are available on the chemical characterization and medicinal importance of guggulsterone [3,6,8,9,10], no study has been carried out elucidating the regulation mechanism(s) of guggulsterone biosynthesis. As of today, even the genome sequence of the species is not available. Because of low phytosterol yield, a large number of trees are damaged every year due to unsustainable harvest leading to the drastic depletion of its natural populations. Therefore, one of the strategies for the conservation of C. wightii is to increase the production of guggulsterone using genomic approaches [11]. Genome sequencing is fundamental to such approaches as it helps in identifying the key signatures governing the important traits.
Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful tool to understand the structural organization and function(s) of genes as well as pathways associated with guggulsterone biosynthesis. The hybrid assembly approach with a large amount of sequencing data for greater coverage and better chromosome-scale scaffolding with optical mapping or HiC has been proved to be effective for genome analysis. The hybrid approach to genome assembly uses cutting-edge technologies to combine short and long reads [12]. The amalgamation of these two sequencing approaches unravels the underlying structural genomics for specific traits [13,14]. Where no genomic data are available, draft genome with lesser sequencing data and scaffolding could be extremely useful [15,16]. Several trait-specific potential genes and gene families from different crops have previously been successfully mined and functionally validated using NGS-based draft and finished genomes along with other applications [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Plant metabolite enhancement programs have immensely benefited from the association data between the genome-wide scan and targeted alkaloid contents [27]. However, plants with a huge genome size and high levels of repetitiveness pose challenges in obtaining high quality sequences [28].
In the present study, a hybrid draft genome of C. wightii, commonly known as guggul with chromosome 2n = 2x = 26 [29], was assembled. An attempt was made to predict a few key genes involved in secondary metabolism and phytosterol biosynthesis pathways using the draft genome. The findings of the study should help in improving C. wightii for enhanced guggulsterone production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Selection of Plant Materials for Genome Sequencing

CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India has a total of 53 guggul germplasms, which were collected from the state of Rajasthan, India (Indigenous collection numbers: IC-471198 to IC-471282). The young leaves from two-month-old seedlings of the genotype with the highest guggulsterone content of 20.37 mg g−1 (IC471203) were used for de novo draft genome sequencing.

2.2. Genomic DNA Isolation

The young leaf tissues were utilized for genomic DNA extraction using nuclei isolation buffer following a combination of several methods and commercial kits (Circulomics Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA) to obtain high molecular weight (HMW) DNA. Prior to sequencing, intactness of DNA was further confirmed by pulse field gel electrophoresis. The isolated genomic DNA was quantified following both QubitdsDNA HS assay (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) with QubitFluorometer, and colorimetric assay with Nanodrop (Nanodrop, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Library Preparation and High-Throughput Sequencing

The genome sequencing was performed on both short read (NextSeq 550, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and long read (PacBio Sequel System, San Diego, CA, USA) platforms. NextSeq 550 sequencer was used to perform the paired end shotgun sequencing. The standard protocol of the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) was used to construct the paired-end sequencing libraries with 300 bp insert lengths. Clonal clusters of each library were generated using cBot with TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v. 3-cBot-HS (Illumina) and sequenced using Hiseq X10 sequencer with a TrueSeq SBS Kit v.2-HS (Illumina, USA) by the pair end sequencing method for 150bp lengths. Two forms of software, namely Hiseq Control Software (HCS) v.2.0.12 and Real Time Analysis (RTA) v.1.17.21.3 (Illumina, USA), were used to analyze the sequence data. The raw reads generated after the sequencing were further pre-processed by trimming the adapter sequences based on quality using default parameters of the FASTX-Toolkit for fastqs data.
A library for the PacBio sequencing was constructed in the same manner using the SMRTBell Template Prep Kit 1.0 (Pacific Bioscience, Menlo Park, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequencing reactions were performed in the SMRT cells by using the SMRTBell template sequencing primer with DNA polymerase. The reaction was run by maintaining the PacBio Sequel in a circular consensus sequencing (CCS) mode using the sequel DNA Polymerase 2.0 with new chemistry 2 (Sequel Binding Kit 2.0, Sequel Sequencing Kit 2.1). The sequencing data were analyzed using SMRT Analysis V.2.2.0 (Pacific biosciences). To estimate the genome size based on the sequencing reads, the K-mer frequency (K-value) was calculated using the K-mer Analysis Toolkit (KAT).

2.4. Flow Cytometry-Based Genome Size Estimation

The genome size of guggul was estimated in a flow cytometer (Cube 8, Konstanz, Germany, Europe) using the Solanum lycopersicum genome as reference. We selected S. lycopersicum as a reference standard because its peak overlapped with that of C. wightii when both the samples were run in the flow cytometer, suggesting closeness in their genome size. Young leaves from the apical meristem were used for sample preparation. Fresh leaves were chopped with a razor blade in ice cold nuclei isolation buffer (Cystain 3 Absolute) and filtered through 35µL mesh. The whole nuclei suspension was added with PI staining solution and incubated for 1 h in dark [30]. After 1 h, the resulted nuclei suspension with labelled DNA was subjected to flow cytometer (Cube 8, Germany, Europe) for measuring relative DNA content. The histogram peaks were used to measure the mean 2C DNA content of collected guggul samples. The median position of G0/G1 peaks in the histograms of the guggul sample was statistically corrected by taking the mean value of the medians with three replicates. The haploid genome size of guggul was estimated by comparing that with 950 Mb Solanum lycopercum genome with 2C = 1.96 pg [31,32,33] following the formula mentioned below:
Sample   2 C   DNA   pg = Mean   of   sample   2 C   peak Mean   of   standard   2 C   peak   standard   2 C   value

2.5. Genome Assembly and Evaluation of Assembled Genome

Several methods were adopted for individual read assembly as well as hybrid genome assembly. To perform the assembly of the sequences, the fastq files were preprocessed at the beginning. Adapter sequences were trimmed and filtered out. Only the reads with average quality score >20 were retained and processed further for downstream analysis. De novo assembly was performed in MaSuRCA [34] by using both PacBio and Illumina cleaned reads with an optimized k-mer length of 48. MaSuRCA assembly was used for further downstream analyses to obtain better statistical coverage. We tried optimization with the Canu for better assembly. However, we could not achieve any substantial improvement with the Canu assembler tool as compared to MaSuRCA. Even the N50 value of MaSuRCA was similar to that of Canu. Therefore, we used only MaSuRCA as our optimized assembly tool. Two methods, viz., Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) and the Quality Assessment Tool for genome assemblies (QUAST) were used to evaluate the quality of the final assembly. The BUSCO v5.4.2 approach was used to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the genome assembly while QUAST 4.0 was used to determine the completeness of Illumina paired end reads that were mapped during the final assembly with the default parameters [35]. BUSCO built several large single copy gene sets based on the OrthoDB database with evolutionary tree. The BUSCO assessment was performed using Viridaeplantae, Eudicots and Embryophyta plant lineage datasets for a total of 138 genomes (57 genomes for Viridaeplantae, 31 genomes for Eudicots and 50 genomes for Embryophyta). The BUSCO was executed in genome mode considering all the conserved orthologs available in the Viridaeplantae, Eudicots and Embryophyta lineages. A total of 4365 conserved orthologous genes (425 in Viridaeplantae, 2326 in Eudicotsand and 1614 in Embryophyta) were considered for the evaluation of genome.

2.6. Analysis of Repetitive Elements

The de novo repetitive sequences in C. wightii genome were identified using RepeatModeler (v.1.0.8) based on a self-blast search. In addition, known repetitive sequences were searched through RepeatMasker (v 2.2) using a cross-match program with a Repbase-derived RepeatMasker library. The de novo repetitive sequences were further constructed using RepeatModeler (v20170127).

2.7. Gene Prediction and Functional Annotation

The MaSuRCA assembled contigs were used to predict the coding sequences (CDSs) through Augustus 3.2.3. The in-house Perl script was used to annotate the predicted genes with the following three steps: (i) matching with the UniProt database using the BLASTX program, (ii) organism annotation and (iii) gene ontology. At first, the predicted genes were compared with the UniProt database using the BLASTX program with an E-value cutoff of 10-3. The best BLASTX hits were filtered based on their identity, query coverage and similarity score. Further, the description of each gene was filtered out using our in-house pipeline. In the second step, the top BLASTX hit was also searched for each gene to identify the top 10 organisms. Lastly, the gene ontology (GO) in terms of molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC) and biological process (BP) was mapped using a pipeline developed in house for such categorization.
The protein sequences were analyzed using a KEGG automation annotation server (KAAS). All the pathways were further screened to understand the enzymes involved in phytosterol biosynthesis and important secondary metabolism. The gene sequences were aligned to the phytosterol genes, downloaded from UniProt andfollowed by filtration based on top hits.

2.8. Phylogenetics and Synteny Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis and synteny plot were obtained using Mega version 7.0. Orthologous sequences were identified with the help of BUSCO and Orthofinder tools for the 23 plant genomes available in the public database along with guggul samples. The integrated supergene sequence was constructed based on the four-fold degenerated sites (4DTv sites) of the orthogroups. The orthogroups obtained by Orthofinder were used to predict the phylogenetic relationship among the different plant species. Mega version 7.0 was used to predict the phylogenetic tree for all the genomes. The maximum parsimony algorithm for phylogenetic analysis with a bootstrap value of 1000 was used. However, due to the unavailability of any sequence data of the other members of the family Burseraceae, the genome of C. wightii was compared with other closely related species. Therefore, additional searches were carried out to find out the reference genome sequence across other closely allied orders and families such as Rutaceae, Brassicaceae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae and Lythraceae. The genome of Citrus sinensis was fetched and organized as a database for the homology search. Each contig from the genome of interest was subjected to a homology search against Citrus sinensis database with cut-off query coverage length of one kb. The matching hit contigs of C. weightii for each chromosome of C. sinensis were fetched for preparing the synteny map and visualized in a Circos plot as total percentage of collinearity. The position of all collinear contigs and their coverage was calculated for each chromosome of C. sinensis and converted into % of homology. BLASTP V2.2.31 was used to analyze the aligned protein sequences of C. wightii and Citrus sinensis (Rutaceae). Circos was used to visualize these genomic synteny block data (http://circos.ca/software, accessed on 20 January 2023).

2.9. Development of SSR Genetic Marker Resources

The Perl script MIcroSAtelitte (MISA) was used to identify microsatellites in the C. wightii genome. The length of nucleotide motifs to identify SSRs was kept from 2 to 6 and the minimum repeat unit was defined as 6 for di-nucleotides, 5 for tri-nucleotides, 4 for tetra-nucleotides, and 3 for penta and hexa-nucleotides. The compound SSRs were categorized by the presence of more than 100 bp in between two SSRs. The designing of primers flanking the repeat regions was carried out by obtaining the SSR information generated by MISA. Two perl scripts were used as interface modules for data interchange between MISA and the primer 3. Only those regions that contained sufficient sequences on both flanking sides of SSR repeats were selected for the development of SSR markers. The designing of SSR primers was carried out by considering the parameters such as primer length (18–24 bp with 20 bp as the optimum), percentage of GC (40–70% with optimum value of 50%), primer Tm (50–60 °C) and product size range (100–500 bp).

2.10. Data Availability

The data generated after assembly were submitted to the NCBI open-access database for use in academic and commercial purposes (SRA Accession Number for Ilumina- SRR12931174 and PacBio- SRR12931173, SRR12931172, and SRR12931171; Bio-project accession number: PRJNA645081; BioSample accession number: SAMN15491827). The data can be accessed by following the link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA645081?reviewer=kmjuh8jqst2446f2bc990r6d9k. All the Supplemental Files and related figures and tables are uploaded in a separate format. The legends of all the figures, tables and Supplemental Material are provided at the end of the manuscript.

3. Results

3.1. Obtaining HMW Genomic DNA and Sequencing

The quantified value of the isolated DNA was 256 ng/µL with a ratio of 1.84 (260/280). Results obtained from pulse field gel electrophoresis were used to select the larger DNA fragments with proper intactness. PacBio-based long read sequencing in SMRT cells generated a total of ~32 Gb of raw data (Supplementary Figures S1 and S3, Table 1). The raw data for the SMRT cells varied from 10.6 GB to 11.28 GB with a varied number of polymerase reads from 811,704 (mean read length of 13,904 bp and 24,250 bp of polymerase read N50) to 868,985 (mean read length of 12,781 bp and 23,750 bp of polymerase read N50). Subsequently, pair-end sequencing through the Illumina platform was generated for a total of ~124 Gb data. A total number of 827,455,092 paired-end reads with 124,118.26 Gb data and with 43.61% GC content were generated and performed for quality score (Supplementary Figure S2, Table 1).

3.2. Flow Cytometry (FCM)-Based Genome Size Estimation

The histograms generated in the standardized FCM procedure resulted in G0/G1 peaks with coefficients of variation ranging from 4.20% to 5.45% (Figure 1A,B and Figure 2, Table 2). When compared with Solanum lycopersicum var. stupicke, as an internal reference standard, the 2C DNA and genome size of C. wightii was estimated at 1.85 pg and 904.63 Mb, respectively (Table 2), which showed negligible variation in size with the assembled draft genome (1.03 Gb).

3.3. De Novo Genome Assembly

Assembly of the genome resulted in 1.4 Gb with a contig N50 of 65,878 bp with CLC assembly (Supplementary Figure S3, Table 3). After assembling the sub-reads, post corrected draft genome size was 1.03 Gb with N50 of 74,387 bp (~74.4 Kb). Statistical analysis of base pairs in the corrected draft genome showed the average GC content in the draft genome was 35.6%.

3.4. Evaluation of Assembled Draft Genome

Comparison of gene set to the 138 genomes in the three lineage datasets (Viridiplantae, Eudicots and Embryophyta) resulted in 98.7% of total complete BUSCOs (C) (4307 complete BUSCO out of 4365) indicating that the genome assembly integrity was good. The total complete BUSCOs comprised 421 (99.1%) in Viridiplantae, 2293 (98.6%) in Eudicots and 1593 (98.7%) in Embryophyta lineages. The detailed single-copy BUSCOs (S), duplicated BUSCOs (D), fragmented BUSCO and missing BUSCO in three different plant lineage datasets are given in Table 4.

3.5. Repeat Analysis

The assembled draft genome had 342.35 Mb of transposable elements (repetitive DNA sequences against Arabidopsis thaliana dataset), constituting 33.1% of the total genome (Table 5). In the repeat sequences, the interspersed repeat constituted a major component of the genome (8.33%, ~86.18 Mb) besides ~1 Mb of tandem repeats. The sequenced genome had 85.9 Mb of transposon elements, in which ~83.9 Mb belonged to class I and ~1.92 Mb to class II elements. The total length of retro-elements was ~83.99 Mb covering 8.12% of total genome, while LTR elements constituted 8.12% with a total length of ~83.94 Mb. DNA transposons occupied 0.19% of the genome with a length of ~1.92 Mb. However, 1501 repeat elements with a total length of ~274 Kb remained unclassified, i.e., only 0.03% of the genome. In the tandem repeats, the total number of simple repeats was 9555, comprising 0.09% of genome with a length of ~0.91 Mb. In contrast, the number of small RNAs was 1504, occupying 0.07% of the genome (Supplementary Table S1).

3.6. Gene Prediction and Functional Annotation

A total of 31,187 genes were predicted and annotated from the assembled draft genome (Supplementary Table S2). The average length of the predicted genes and coding sequences (CDS) was 28694.46 bp and 6377.33 bp, respectively. The proteins had 2125.46 amino acids (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Comparing the predicted gene set of C. wightii with that of functional database revealed a total of 28,482 annotated genes that accounted for 91.32% of the total assembled draft genome. Annotation of the guggul draft genome with BLASTX showed the presence of sequence similarity with several other species. However, the top 10 organisms with a maximum sequence similarity were considered for organism annotation study. Comparative analysis suggested that Vitis vinifera has the maximum sequence similarity with number of hits reaching almost 6000 followed by Citrus clementina and C. sinensis with a value of 2501 and 2224, respectively (Supplementary Figure S4). Morus notabilis showed the least sequence similarity (579 hits).
The elucidation of gene ontology for biological processes, molecular function and cellular components was mapped using an in-house pipeline. Based on GO terms, identified genes were further mapped in three categories: biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC), respectively (Supplementary Table S5a–c). In the BP category regulation of transcription, DNA templated (GO:0006355) with 363 genes and a cytokinin biosynthetic process (GO:0009691) with 949 genes and DNA integration (GO:0015074) with a maximum of 12,982 genes were prominent. In the MF category, ATP binding (GO:0005524) with 1914 genes, zinc ion binding (GO:0008270) with 6805 genes and nucleic acid binding (GO:0003676) with 15,246 genes were highly represented. Cytoplasm (GO:0005737) with 237 genes, nucleus (GO:0005634) with 853 genes and integral component of membrane (GO:0016021) with a total of 2953 genes were dominant in the CC category (Figure 3).

3.7. Genes Associated with Primary and Secondary Metabolite Pathways

The functional classification of the genes primarily involved in different metabolic pathways, KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), was performed using Blast2Go software (https://www.blast2go.com). A total of 1082 genes were mapped across 302 different metabolic pathways (Figure 4). Further, pathways were classified into 10 different pathway modules based on the KEGG’s canonical classes of pathway maps. These pathways were further grouped into two major categories: (1) metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (two pathways, five genes) and (2) biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites (three pathways, four genes). The most enriched secondary metabolites characterized in the “Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides” were terpenoid backbone biosynthesis and plant terpenoid biosynthesis. The most important pathways in the “Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites” category were monolignol biosynthesis, flavanone biosynthesis and mugineic acid biosynthesis.

3.8. Abundance of Phytosterol Pathways Genes in C. weightii Draft Genome

Genes associated with the biosynthesis of phytosterol were analyzed. Cycloartenol synthase 1(CAS1) was found to be involved in phytosterol biosynthesis (Supplementary Figure S5). This key gene (seq id: g234.t1) had 83% matching with the Arabidopsis dataset (geneID sp|P38605|CAS1_ARATH). Thus, the key gene was unique with a 16% mismatch altogether. The other important gene (g116.t1) was matched with a 75% identity with the squalene epoxidase of Arabidopsis dataset [NC_003071.7: c9726384-9723615_SQE2_ARATH_GeneID=816814] involved in phytosterol biosynthesis.
The precursor of squalene epoxidase is squalene 2,3 epoxide, which diverted the pathway flux towards phytosterol biosynthesis through squalene epoxidase.
The HMGR [3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase 1, NC_015439.3:c46508678-46505935_HMGR_SOLLC_GeneID=543702] of Solanum lycopersicum was found to be mapped with 67.5% homology with C. weightii gene (g892.t1). There were also few known transcription factors (WRKY1, MYC2, involved on phytosterol biosynthesis genes were orthologous within the gene list of Commiphora weightii (Table 6).

3.9. Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetics

To understand the evolutionary status of guggul, the molecular phylogeny was studied based on the whole genome at species level. The draft genome of C. wightii when compared with 23 available genomes in the public domain (Supplementary Table S6, Figure 5), revealed 2692 orthogroups. Species tree derived from the phylogenetic analysis indicated that Citrus unshiu, C. sinesis and C. clementiana in Rutaceae diversified earlier than Commiphorawightii, and Citrus clementiana and C. sinesis were closely related to Commiphora wightii. Phylogenetic analysis of C. wightii with other sapindales members such as C. sinesis, C. clementiana and C. unshiu revealed the common ancestry with members of Malvales such as Corchorus capsularis, C. olitorius, Duriozibethinus, Gossypium arboreum, G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, Herraniaumbratica and Theobroma cacao. In addition, information obtained from the phylogenetic analysis suggested that Sapindales and Brassicales are distantly related with each other and members of Brassicales diverged earlier than members of Malvales, Myrtales and Sapindales. Consequently, phylogeny revealed new information on origin and relatedness of C. wightii with its close relatives.
Synteny analysis using Citrus sinensis as a reference resulted in 3357 syntenic blocks altogether with more than 1kb hits. A total of 3265 synteny blocks of assembled contigs of C. wightii were collinear with the nine chromosomes and 92 with cp and mitochondria genome of C. sinensis (Supplementary Table S7). The assembled genome of C. wightii had a maximum number of synteny blocks (554) with the chromosome-2 of C. sinensis, followed by chromosome-3 (504) and the least number of synteny blocks were found in chromosome-8 and 9 of C. sinensis (Figure 6). Moreover, there were 3265 synteny blocks of the assembled draft genome of C. weightii, 24 (99.9% coverage) syntenic blocks in cpGenome and 68 (33.1% coverage) in mtGenome (Table 7). When all BLAST hits of assembled contigs of C. weightii with all chromosomes of Citrus sinensis were performed and mapped in the Circos plot, our results on micro-synteny blocks suggested that draft genome of C. wightii and publicly available reported genome of C. sinensis carry a strong genomic syntenic relationship (Supplementary Figure S6a–k).

3.10. Mining of SSR Markers

SSR markers were identified from the assembled draft genome. A total number of 23,822 sequences with ~1.03 GB were examined for SSR identification. Out of the 23,822 sequences, 22,294 were SSR-containing sequences with a total of 3,86,735 SSRs. Of these, 3,38,755 SSRs were in simple form and 47,980 were in compound form. With respect to number of repeat motifs, dinucleotide repeats (DNRs) were more abundant (80,992) than TNRs (24,606), TtNRs (3982) and PNRs (1724) (Supplementary Table S8).

4. Discussion

Whole genome sequencing of Commiphora wightii is crucial for elucidating pathways/genes associated with guggulsterone biosynthesis. Since no genome information is currently available in respect to C. wightii, the first-ever genome sequence reported in the present study, albeit being a draft genome, has high future relevance. The size of the C. wightii draft genome is approximately 1.03 GB. The presence of a large number of repetitive sequences in the genome, intricacies in the reproductive process, and the high level of heterozygosity made the assembling process challenging. Most of the plant species are scaffolded with genetic linkage maps into chromosome-scale assemblies. However, we could not achieve this in C. weightii because of constraints related to data availability for effective scaffolding, e.g., data on HiC, optimal map and genetic map [36,37,38]. Despite these constraints, our contig N50 was similar (N50:74.4 Kb) to that of the available draft genome assembly of other medicinal plants (e.g. N50:18.8 Kb D. rotundata, N50: 9.3 Kb in E. guineensis (N50:114.3 Kb in A. comosus) [36,37,38]. The assembled genome was also largely non-repetitive, indicating less redundancy in gene sequences. Yet the assembly generated in this study has ample scope for improvement to obtain a high quality genome of C. weghtii as characterized by high contig N50, high average read depth, and presence of most of the BUSCOs. The Hi-C sequence and optical map data would improve the C. weightii genome assembly to chromosome-scale.
The estimated genome size of C. wightii was 1.03 Gb, making it one of the largest draft genome sequences that is currently available. Other species with large genomes include, Cannabis sativa (534 Mb), Cajanus cajan (833.07 Mb), Azadirachta indica (364 Mb), Morus alba (330 Mb), Citrus sinensis (367 Mb), Quercus suber (953.3 Mb) and Asclepias syriaca (420 Mb) [14,18,39,40,41,42,43]. Angiosperms are known to exhibit a significant amount of variation in their genome size that ranges from ~60 Mb in Genlisea aurea to ~150 Gb in Paris japonica [44,45]. Several factors contribute towards the variation in genome size resulting in genome purging or bloating. Among these, transposable elements are essential regulators that alter genome content [44]. The accumulation of transposable elements in the genome is caused due to epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation. In recent times, several studies based on the genome-wide DNA methylation revealed the impact of epigenome in regulating genome size variation [44].
The “C-value paradox” as revealed from correlation analysis between FCM-based genome size estimation and genome assembly, suggested a disproportionate relationship between genome size and number of genes present on it. Though several studies have shown a positive correlation between the genome size and gene content in prokaryotes and primitive eukaryotes, such a trend is not consistent in higher eukaryotes [45,46,47]. Despite a three-fold increase in genome size (Commiphora wightii 1.03 Gb vs. Citrus sinensis 367 Mb), the number of predicted genes in C. wightii was 31, 187, which was quite similar to 29, 445 genes in Citrus sinensis. The total genome content (1C DNA) vs. the level of complexity in organisms still remains unexplained.
Sequencing the entire genome would include both repetitive and non-repetitive areas, increasing the genome size. Therefore, compared to the entire genome assembly, draft genome sequence always delivers a substantially smaller genome size. We were able to sequence only the regions that had a single copy of each sequence. The regions with repetitive sequences were excluded from the sequencing and assembly. The percentage of repeat elements in guggul was smaller than that in Cajanus cajan (51.67%) and Morus alba (47%), but greater than Azadirachta indica (13.03%) and Citrus sinensis (20.5%) genomes [14,18,40,41]. Variation in genome size among the closely related species not only provides essential clues to understand the underlying mechanisms of such variations but also helps to establish phylogenetic relationship within and among the species. However, presence of repetitive elements in the genome in high proportion does create complexities for analysis and annotation, limiting the characterization of some significant regions of the genome. These difficulties become more evident when conducting a comparative analysis of repeats among multiple species. Stress conditions and other environmental factors can up-regulate the activity of TEs and consequently introduce new insertions within the genome. As a result, the sequences at the flanking regions may become transcriptionally activated under similar type of stress conditions. Such type of regulatory mechanism exhibited by TEs may allow rapid genome evolution and enhance the ability of plants to withstand extreme environmental conditions. Further studies are required for elucidating the evolutionary dynamics of TEs and understanding their impact on plant genome size, organization, expression and evolution.
Our results revealed the presence of maximum number of genes related to DNA integration compared to other genes, suggesting a greater stability and integrity in the chromosomes. In addition, genes for nucleic acid binding and integral membrane component have also shown maximum numbers in terms of molecular functions. The study of Gene Ontology (GO) helped understanding the physiological adaptation of the species to survive in extreme environmental conditions.
Different contigs of the assembled draft genome of C. wightii showed a high level of synteny with most of the chromosomes of Citrus sinensis, suggesting structural similarity between Citrus and Commiphora genomes. In addition, synteny analysis also revealed high degree of stability in both the species, which might have conserved throughout the evolutionary process. Further, the presence ofhigh level of gene density and intergenic regions could have resulted in the structural similarities in both the genomes. The maximum number of syntenic blocks of C. weightii was collinear with the chromosome number 2 of C. sinensis followed by chromosomes 3. Conversely, the least number of orthologous regions were identified in chromosome 8 and 9 of C. sinensis. A comparison of syntenic blocks between the two species would enable us to study the structural and functional diversity that could lead to decipher complex evolutionary relationships.
The developed genomic resources such as SSRs could be used to get insights into the population structure of C. wightii using the identified SSRs to infer various levels of variation within and between populations. Further evaluation of these polymorphisms should help guggulsterone association studies. The simultaneous rearrangement of SSRs and the evolution of the plant genome can take place [48].
Several studies have been conducted in the field of plant sterol biosynthesis. However, there is little information on guggul biosynthesis. Plants mostly retain the two pathways, mevalonate synthesis and isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) polymerization, although the post-squalene pathway shows noticeable modifications. A special oxidosqualenecyclase found only in plants, cycloartenol synthase (CAS), is able to catalyze the transformation of 2,3-oxidosqualene into cycloartenol, a pentacy clictriter penoid that serves as a common precursor for cholesterol and C24-alkyl sterols. By using this method, the cation may be moved from the oxidized squalene’s C-20 position to the position C-9, creating a cyclopropane ring between C-9 and C-19. Recent research has shown that CAS significantly affects sterol content and, as a result, changes phenotypic traits [49]. It is generally known that sterol side chain reductase (SSR) in plants is sub-divided into sterol side chain reductase 1 (SSR1) and sterol side chain reductase 2 (SSR2) [50]. According to earlier research, SSR1 catalyzed the final step in the synthesis of campesterol and sitosterol, but SSR2 is simply in charge of changing cycloartenol into cycloartenol in the cholesterol pathway [51,52]. The development of several types of plants’ reproductive and vegetative organs is reportedly affected by SSR1, also known as DFW1 [53].SSR2 contributes primarily to the production of cholesterol in plants, where it catalyzes the conversion of cycloartenol to cycloartenol, in contrast to SSR1′s function in the biosynthesis of C24-alkyl sterols [54]. The shift in cholesterol content caused by SSR2 regulation in the plant has been demonstrated to have an impact on the buildup of steroidal glycoalkaloids (SGAs). SSR1 and SSR2 are crucial sterol side chain reductases because they are needed for the production of C24-alkyl sterols and cholesterol, respectively.
Sterol methyltransferase (SMT) in plants catalyzes the side chain’s alkylation [53]. SMT directs post-squalene metabolic fluxes toward the production of cholesterol, campesterol, and sitosterol, which is crucial for the variety of plant sterols [55,56]. SMT1 (EC) and SMT2 (EC), which are both engaged in primary methylation and secondary methylation, are two different kinds of SMT found in plants [57]. SMT1 catalyzes the methylation of cycloartenol into 24-methylene cycloartenol as the initial step in adding methyl groups to the 24-desmethyl sterols. SMT2 helped to enhance the conversion of 24- ethylenelophenol into 24- ethylidenelophenol. The branch point of the synthesis of C24-methyl sterols and C24-ethyl sterols is 24-methylenelophenol, which is intriguing [57,58].
The synthesis of sterols in plants is reportedly regulated by the transcription factors (TF) WRKY TFs, MYC TFs and ERF TFs [59,60,61]. In our findings, a few important transcription factors viz., WRKY1, MYC2, and ERG5 involved in phytosterol biosynthesis genes were identified in the gene list of Commiphora weightii. WRKY1, a member of the WRKY TF family, controls the concentrations of secondary metabolite products in plants, including sterols and glycoalkaloids [62]. It is notable that WRKY1, MYC2 and ERF4 are all involved in regulating sterol synthesis in plants whereas WRKY1 is a salicylic acid response factor, and MYC2 and ERF4 are all jasmonate acid response factors. Therefore, it is necessary to look into other transcription factors that are involved in the creation of plant sterols.
The main aspect of investigation into the post-transcriptional regulation of sterols is hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), a rate-limiting enzyme in the plant sterol production pathway [63]. Therefore, we propose that plants regulate sterol variations in response to environmental stress, specifically changes in C24-alkyl sterol concentration, which may be implicated in hormone induction.
The over-extraction and harvesting of oleogum resin in an unsustainable manner have caused the depletion of C. wightii populations in nature. Further, other anthropogenic disturbances such as altered land use practices have caused habitat loss and fragmentation within the existing populations of C. wightii [64]. In critically endangered species with severely reduced populations, conventional breeding programmes may not be successful. The genome data is essential for precision breeding that would help the species to avoid such inbreeding related challenges as elimination of recessive lethal alleles and decreased disease resistance [65]. Previous studies have successfully developed in vitro propagation protocol for the species with anther culture and somatic embryogenesis [66]. Vegetative propagation through stem cuttings was also effective [64,67]. However, survival rate of the plants under field conditions remained poor and thus considered to be one of the major limitations for conserving the species. Only a limited number of studies focusing on the conservation through molecular/genetics approach are available [68,69]. Reduction in the effective population size and increase in homozygosity could be the two major driving forces for loss of diversity within and across the populations of C. wightii. For any conservation program, a dense and large number of markers are needed as the genomic resources. Information gained from genome sequencing programs can contribute towards conservation, and management of guggul. Genome sequencing can also help in understanding the evolutionary trends and prioritization of the imperiled populations for conservation.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

The draft genome of C. wightii was put together using a hybrid assembly method, which revealed a size of ~1.03 Gb. The present study is the first attempt to sequence the draft genome of any member of the Burseraceae family. The variation in the size of C. wightii’s genome compared to that of other closely related species raises the possibility that the genome is influenced by a significant number of repetitive sequences. Citrus clade was revealed as a common ancestor for C. wightii, and the existence of more syntenic blocks between these two species further demonstrated the gene structural homology. In order to create superior varieties through focused molecular breeding programmes, understanding structural genomics is crucial.
The draft genome will be a valuable resource for further genomic studies in guggul. The draft genome would provide insight into the ecological adaptation of the species under the changing environmental conditions. In addition, the genomic resource will be helpful in designing an effective conservation programme including genomic-based conservation.
Future research should exploit the potential of whole genome sequencing and optical mapping to pinpoint the sequences of the genome’s gap regions. Refined complete genome could aid in identifying key genes, transcription factors, repeats, etc. with crucial roles in the biosynthesis of guggul/guggulsterone and species’ adaptability. The comparative metabolomics of guggul and its close relatives may reflect valuable insights into the convergence of secondary metabolites in order to identify the similarities in terms of chemical compounds. This approach might enable us to draw a conclusion on the plesiomorphic or apomorphic origin of this diverse class of secondary metabolites, which could be helpful in the elucidation of secondary metabolites in C. wightii.
Due to a lack of transcriptomics data, the structural variations within the genome with their functional consequences could not be correlated in the present study. Future studies should also focus on the expression of pathway gene/s associated with guggulsterone biosynthesis across different populations. Additionally, a transcriptome profile would be beneficial for locating defense responsive genes that could have a major impact on reducing biotic stress in the species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life13030662/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Polymerase read (A–C) and estimated insert lengths (D–F) obtained through long read sequencing in PacBio platform by using three SMRT flow cells namely 1SMRT, 2SMRT and 3SMRT respectively. Supplementary Figure S2: Graphical representation of short read sequencing, depicting the quality, base and GC distribution in read orientation 1 (A–C) and read orientation 2 (D–F), respectively. Supplementary Figure S3: Graphical representation showing total number of contigs and their respective size ranges in base pair unit. Supplementary Figure S4: Distribution of top ten organisms for organism annotation obtained through BLASTX program. Supplementary Figure S5: Genes involved in phytosterol biosynthesis pathways. Supplementary Figure S6a–j: Details of microsynteny blocks of each assembled contigs of C. weightii with all chromosomes (Chr-1-9 and mt-genome and cp-genome) of C. sinenesis. Supplementary Table S1: Details of the repeat analysis performed through RepeatMasker v 2.2 using Arabidopsis as reference. Supplementary Table S2: List of predicted genes with annotation. Supplementary Table S3: FASTA formatted genes with CDS region. Supplementary Table S4: FASTA formatted protein coding regions. Supplementary Table S5a–c: Details of GO annotation of predicted genes. Supplementary Table S6: Total number of 23 plant species selected as reference for constructing the phylogenetic tree. Each branch indicates the confidence level interval for each divergence. Supplementary Table S7: Details Synteny analysis of contigs of C. weghtii with homology search with Citrus sinensis. Supplementary Table S8: Results showing the total number of SSRs found in the draft genome of Commiphora wightii along with their distribution into different classes.

Author Contributions

S.N.J. conceptualized the idea while T.S.R. and O.P.S. supported it. G.J.T., B.J. and B.M. collected the samples and performed the DNA extraction, quantification and library preparation. R.P.B., S.N.J., B.J. and G.J.T. discussed and analyzed the bioinformatics data. S.N.J., R.P.B., G.J.T. and B.J. framed the whole manuscript and R.P.B., G.J.T. and S.N.J. wrote the manuscript. T.S.R. and S.N.J. revised the manuscript while S.K.B. critically edited the whole MS and monitored the whole program in a timely manner. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for financial support (project no. HCP0010). We would like to acknowledge again CSIR, New Delhi for the article processing fees from MLP projects, as the HCP0010 was completed.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical Committee (CSIR-NBRI) Manuscript No. CSIR-NBRI_MS/2021/03/03.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

NCBI repository; SRA accession number for Ilumina: SRR12931174 and PacBio: SRR12931173, SRR12931172 and SRR12931171; Bio-project accession number: PRJNA645081; BioSample accession number: SAMN15491827). The data can be accessed by following the link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA645081?reviewer=kmjuh8jqst2446f2bc990r6d9k.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ratnesh Tripathi, and Navajeet Chakraborty for reviewing the manuscript. We acknowledge Babita Singh for helping us in searching public domain phytosterol genes with BLAST hit. We are grateful to Padma Tamang, UGC Senior Research Fellow (SRF) for assisting in the flow cytometric data analysis and Arpita Ghosh for helping in micro-synteny analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shweta, N.; Illa, P. An overview on Commiphora wightii (Arn.) Bhandari, an endangered plant species of Burseraceae family. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 3, 350–356. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sinal, C.J.; Gonzalez, F.J. Guggulsterone: An old approach to a new problem. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 13, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Urizar, N.L.; Moore, D.D. GUGULIPID: A Natural Cholesterol-Lowering Agent. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2003, 23, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, J.-Y.; Della-Fera, M.A.; Baile, C.A. Guggulsterone Inhibits Adipocyte Differentiation and Induces Apoptosis in 3T3-L1 Cells. Obesity 2008, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shishodia, S.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Guggulsterone inhibits tumor cell proliferation, induces S-phase arrest, and promotes apoptosis through activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase, suppression of Akt pathway, and downregulation of antiapoptotic gene products. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Deng, R. Therapeutic Effects of Guggul and Its Constituent Guggulsterone: Cardiovascular Benefits. Cardiovasc. Drug Rev. 2007, 25, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soni, V.; Swarnkar, P.; Tyagi, V.; Pareek, L. Variation in E- and Z-guggulsterones of Commiphora wightii. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, X.; Greilberger, J.; Ledinski, G.; Kager, G.; Paigen, B.; Jürgens, G. The hypolipidemic natural product Commiphora mukul and its component guggulsterone inhibit oxidative modification of LDL. Atherosclerosis 2004, 172, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulhari, A.; Sheorayan, A.; Chaudhury, A.; Sarkar, S.; Kalia, R.K. Quantitative determination of guggulsterone in existing natural populations of Commiphora wightii (Arn.) Bhandari for identification of germplasm having higher guggulsterone content. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2014, 21, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sarup, P.; Bala, S.; Kamboj, S. Pharmacology and Phytochemistry of Oleo-Gum Resin of Commiphora wightii (Guggulu). Scientifica 2015, 2015, 138039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wilson, S.A.; Roberts, S.C. Metabolic engineering approaches for production of biochemicals in food and medicinal plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Quail, M.A.; Smith, M.; Coupland, P.; Otto, T.D.; Harris, S.R.; Connor, T.R.; Bertoni, A.; Swerdlow, H.P.; Gu, Y. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: Comparison of Ion torrent, pacific biosciences and illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kasahara, M.; Naruse, K.; Sasaki, S.; Nakatani, Y.; Qu, W.; Ahsan, B.; Yamada, T.; Nagayasu, Y.; Doi, K.; Kasai, Y.; et al. The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution. Nature 2007, 447, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, Q.; Chen, L.-L.; Ruan, X.; Chen, D.; Zhu, A.; Chen, C.; Bertrand, D.; Jiao, W.-B.; Hao, B.-H.; Lyon, M.P.; et al. The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Nat. Genet. 2012, 45, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, K.; Wang, Z.; Li, F.; Ye, W.; Wang, J.; Song, G.; Yue, Z.; Cong, L.; Shang, H.; Zhu, S.; et al. The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mohindra, V.; Dangi, T.; Tripathi, R.K.; Kumar, R.; Singh, R.K.; Jena, J.K.; Mohapatra, T. Draft genome assembly of Tenualosa ilisha, Hilsa shad, provides resource for osmoregulation studies. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chan, A.P.; Crabtree, J.; Zhao, Q.; Lorenzi, H.; Orvis, J.; Puiu, D.; Melake-Berhan, A.; Jones, K.M.; Redman, J.; Chen, G.; et al. Draft genome sequence of the oilseed species Ricinus communis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Varshney, R.K.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Bharti, A.K.; Saxena, R.K.; Schlueter, J.A.; Donoghue, M.T.; Azam, S.; Fan, G.; Whaley, A.M.; et al. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yang, H.; Tao, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, G.; Sweetingham, M.W.; Howieson, J.G.; Li, C. Draft Genome Sequence, and a Sequence-Defined Genetic Linkage Map of the Legume Crop Species Lupinus angustifolius L. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wei, C.; Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Liu, C.; Gao, L.; Xia, E.; Lu, Y.; Tai, Y.; She, G.; et al. Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E4151–E4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fuentes-Pardo, A.P.; Ruzzante, D. Whole-genome sequencing approaches for conservation biology: Advantages, limitations and practical recommendations. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 5369–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Schiffels, S.; Durbin, R. Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Snyder, M.W.; Adey, A.; Kitzman, J.O.; Shendure, J. Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing: Experimental methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fischer, M.C.; Rellstab, C.; Leuzinger, M.; Roumet, M.; Gugerli, F.; Shimizu, K.K.; Holderegger, R.; Widmer, A. Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation—An empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Fuentes, P.; Zhou, F.; Erban, A.; Karcher, D.; Kopka, J.; Bock, R. A new synthetic biology approach allows transfer of an entire metabolic pathway from a medicinal plant to a biomass crop. Elife 2016, 5, e13664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Supple, M.A.; Shapiro, B. Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mu, W.; Wei, J.; Yang, T.; Fan, Y.; Cheng, L.; Yang, J.; Mu, R.; Liu, J.; Zhao, J.; Sun, W.; et al. The draft genome assembly of the critically endangered Nyssa yunnanensis, a plant species with extremely small populations endemic to Yunnan Province, China. Gigabyte 2020, 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, L.; Winzer, T.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Ning, Z.; He, Z.; Teodor, R.; Lu, Y.; Bowser, T.A.; Graham, I.A.; et al. The opium poppy genome and morphinan production. Science 2018, 362, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dixit, A.; Rao, S.S. Observation on distribution and habitat characteristics of Gugal (Commiphora wightii) in the arid region of Kachchh, Gujarat, India. Trop. Ecol. 2000, 41, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  30. Doležel, J.; Greilhuber, J.; Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2233–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. BBarone, A.; Chiusano, M.L.; Ercolano, M.R.; Giuliano, G.; Grandillo, S.; Frusciante, L. Structural and Functional Genomics of Tomato. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2008, 2008, 820274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Hirakawa, H.; Asamizu, E.; Shirasawa, K.; Isobe, S.; Kaneko, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Shibata, D.; Aoki, K.; et al. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485, 635–641. [Google Scholar]
  33. Doležel, J.; Sgorbati, S.; Lucretti, S. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiol. Plant. 1992, 85, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zimin, A.V.; Marçais, G.; Puiu, D.; Roberts, M.; Salzberg, S.L.; Yorke, J.A. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2669–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Singh, R.; Ong-Abdullah, M.; Low, E.-T.L.; Manaf, M.A.A.; Rosli, R.; Nookiah, R.; Ooi, L.C.-L.; Ooi, S.-E.; Chan, K.-L.; Halim, M.A.; et al. Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of interfertile species in old and new worlds. Nature 2013, 500, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ming, R.; VanBuren, R.; Wai, C.M.; Tang, H.; Schatz, M.C.; Bowers, J.E.; Lyons, E.; Wang, M.-L.; Chen, J.; Biggers, E.; et al. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tamiru, M.; Natsume, S.; Takagi, H.; White, B.; Yaegashi, H.; Shimizu, M.; Yoshida, K.; Uemura, A.; Oikawa, K.; Abe, A.; et al. Genome sequencing of the staple food crop white Guinea yam enables the development of a molecular marker for sex determination. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Van Bakel, H.; Stout, J.M.; Cote, A.G.; Tallon, C.M.; Sharpe, A.G.; Hughes, T.R.; Page, J.E. The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Krishnan, N.M.; Pattnaik, S.; Jain, P.; Gaur, P.; Choudhary, R.; Vaidyanathan, S.; Deepak, S.; Hariharan, A.K.; Krishna, P.B.; Nair, J.; et al. A draft of the genome and four transcriptomes of a medicinal and pesticidal angiosperm Azadirachta indica. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. He, N.; Zhang, C.; Qi, X.; Zhao, S.; Tao, Y.; Yang, G.; Lee, T.-H.; Wang, X.; Cai, Q.; Li, D.; et al. Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ramos, A.M.; Usié, A.; Barbosa, P.; Barros, P.M.; Capote, T.; Chaves, I.; Simões, F.; Abreu, I.; Carrasquinho, I.; Faro, C.; et al. The draft genome sequence of cork oak. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Weitemier, K.; Straub, S.C.; Fishbein, M.; Bailey, C.D.; Cronn, R.C.; Liston, A. A draft genome and transcriptome of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) as resources for evolutionary, ecological, and molecular studies in milkweeds and Apocynaceae. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Fedoroff, N.V. Transposable elements, epigenetics, and genome evolution. Science 2012, 338, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lynch, M.; Conery, J.S. The Origins of Genome Complexity. Science 2003, 302, 1401–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Konstantinidis, K.T.; Tiedje, J.M. Trends between gene content and genome size in prokaryotic species with larger genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3160–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gregory, T.R. Synergy between sequence and size in Large-scale genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, A.; Hou, F.; Zhang, L. Evolution Analysis of Simple Sequence Repeats in Plant Genome. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sonawane, P.D.; Pollier, J.; Panda, S.; Szymanski, J.; Massalha, H.; Yona, M.; Unger, T.; Malitsky, S.; Arendt, P.; Pauwels, L.; et al. Plant cholesterol biosynthetic pathway overlaps with phytosterol metabolism. Nat. Plants 2016, 3, 16205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Knoch, E.; Sugawara, S.; Mori, T.; Poulsen, C.; Fukushima, A.; Harholt, J.; Fujimoto, Y.; Umemoto, N.; Saito, K. Third DWF1 paralog in Solanaceae, sterol Δ24-isomerase, branches withanolide biosynthesis from the general phytosterol pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E8096–E8103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tsukagoshi, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Seki, H.; Muranaka, T.; Ohyama, K.; Fujimoto, Y. Ajuga Δ24-Sterol Reductase Catalyzes the Direct Reductive Conversion of 24-Methylenecholesterol to Campesterol. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 8189–8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Lin, Q.; Liu, A.; Wang, T.; Feng, X.; Liu, J.; Han, H.; Ma, Y.; Bonea, D.; et al. A tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein SSR1 located in mitochondria is involved in root development and auxin polar transport in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 83, 582–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Choe, S.; Dilkes, B.P.; Gregory, B.D.; Ross, A.S.; Yuan, H.; Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Tanaka, A.; Yoshida, S.; et al. The Arabidopsis dwarf1 Mutant Is Defective in the Conversion of 24-Methylenecholesterol to Campesterol in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Sawai, S.; Ohyama, K.; Yasumoto, S.; Seki, H.; Sakuma, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Takebayashi, Y.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Aoki, T.; et al. Sterol Side Chain Reductase 2 Is a Key Enzyme in the Biosynthesis of Cholesterol, the Common Precursor of Toxic Steroidal Glycoalkaloids in Potato. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3763–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Shi, J.; Gonzales, R.A.; Bhattacharyya, M.K. Identification and Characterization of an S-Adenosyl-L-methionine:Δ24-Sterol-C-methyltransferase cDNA from Soybean. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9384–9389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Schaeffer, A.; Bronner, R.; Benveniste, P.; Schaller, H. The ratio of campesterol to sitosterol that modulates growth in Arabidopsis is controlled by STEROL METHYLTRANSFERASE 2; 1. Plant J. 2001, 25, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Schaller, H. The role of sterols in plant growth and development. Prog. Lipid Res. 2003, 42, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Song, Z.; Nes, W.D. Sterol C24-methyltransferase: Mechanistic studies of the C-methylation reaction with 24-fluorocycloartenol. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 18, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dhar, N.; Rana, S.; Razdan, S.; Bhat, W.W.; Hussain, A.; Dhar, R.S.; Vaishnavi, S.; Hamid, A.; Vishwakarma, R.; Lattoo, S.K. Cloning and Functional Characterization of Three Branch Point Oxidosqualene Cyclases from Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17249–17267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Singh, A.K.; Kumar, S.R.; Dwivedi, V.; Rai, A.; Pal, S.; Shasany, A.K.; Nagegowda, D.A. A WRKY transcription factor from Withania somnifera regulates triterpenoid withanolide accumulation and biotic stress tolerance through modulation of phytosterol and defense pathways. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 1115–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Thagun, C.; Imanishi, S.; Kudo, T.; Nakabayashi, R.; Ohyama, K.; Mori, T.; Kawamoto, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Katayama, M.; Nonaka, S.; et al. Jasmonate-Responsive ERF Transcription Factors Regulate Steroidal Glycoalkaloid Biosynthesis in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 961–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Sharma, A.; Rather, G.A.; Misra, P.; Dhar, M.K.; Lattoo, S.K. Jasmonate responsive transcription factor WsMYC2 regulates the biosynthesis of triterpenoid withanolides and phytosterol via key pathway genes in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xu, L.; Simoni, R. The inhibition of degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase by sterol regulatory element binding protein cleavage-activating protein requires four phenylalanine residues in span 6 of HMG-CoA reductase transmembrane domain. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 414, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Soni, V. Conservation of Commiphora wightii, an endangered medicinal shrub, through propagation and planting, and education awareness programs in the Aravali Hills of Rajasthan, India. Conserv. Evid. 2010, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  65. Steiner, C.C.; Putnam, A.S.; Hoeck, P.E.; Ryder, O.A. Conservation Genomics of Threatened Animal Species. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2013, 1, 261–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kumar, S.; Mathur, M.; Jain, A.K.; Ramawat, K.G. Somatic Embryo Proliferation in Commiphora wightii and Evidence for Guggulsterone Production in Culture; CSIR: New Delhi, India, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kulhari, A.; Sheorayan, A.; Kalia, S.; Chaudhury, A.; Kalia, R.K. Problems, progress and future prospects of improvement of Commiphora wightii (Arn.) Bhandari, an endangered herbal magic, through modern biotechnological tools: A review. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 1223–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Haque, I.; Bandopadhyay, R.; Mukhopadhyay, K. Intraspecific Variation in Commiphora wightii Populations Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) Sequences of rDNA. Diversity 2009, 1, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Samantaray, S.; Geetha, K.A.; Hidayath, K.P.; Maiti, S. Identification of RAPD markers linked to sex determination in guggal [Commiphora wightii (Arnott.)] Bhandari. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2009, 4, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow cytometry analysis showing histogram (A) and density plots (B) of G0/G1 peaks of Commiphora wightii and reference standard Solanum lycopersicum.
Figure 1. Flow cytometry analysis showing histogram (A) and density plots (B) of G0/G1 peaks of Commiphora wightii and reference standard Solanum lycopersicum.
Life 13 00662 g001
Figure 2. Flow cytometry data based on three-dimensional histogram plot showing the overlaying of G0/G1 peaks of Commiphora wightii and reference standard Solanum lycopersicum.
Figure 2. Flow cytometry data based on three-dimensional histogram plot showing the overlaying of G0/G1 peaks of Commiphora wightii and reference standard Solanum lycopersicum.
Life 13 00662 g002
Figure 3. Gene ontology annotation of genes based on domains present in the encoded proteins. (A) Biological process classification, (B) molecular function classification and (C) cellular component.
Figure 3. Gene ontology annotation of genes based on domains present in the encoded proteins. (A) Biological process classification, (B) molecular function classification and (C) cellular component.
Life 13 00662 g003aLife 13 00662 g003b
Figure 4. Major metabolic pathways identified in the genome of C. weightii. Number of genes associated with each pathway was shown adjacent to each bar.
Figure 4. Major metabolic pathways identified in the genome of C. weightii. Number of genes associated with each pathway was shown adjacent to each bar.
Life 13 00662 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationship among 24 plant species generated from MEGA version 7.0 by using maximum parsimony algorithm with a bootstrap value of 1000.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationship among 24 plant species generated from MEGA version 7.0 by using maximum parsimony algorithm with a bootstrap value of 1000.
Life 13 00662 g005
Figure 6. Circos plot obtained through synteny analysis by comparing assembled contigs of Commiphora wightii with Citrus sinensis reference genome; CS = Citrus sinensis and CW = Commiphora weightii. The number after contigs represents total number of syntenic blocks.
Figure 6. Circos plot obtained through synteny analysis by comparing assembled contigs of Commiphora wightii with Citrus sinensis reference genome; CS = Citrus sinensis and CW = Commiphora weightii. The number after contigs represents total number of syntenic blocks.
Life 13 00662 g006
Table 1. Details of sequencing data, N50 value and quality score of Commiphora wightii using PacBio and Illumina sequencing platforms.
Table 1. Details of sequencing data, N50 value and quality score of Commiphora wightii using PacBio and Illumina sequencing platforms.
Details of Long Read Sequencing
(PacBio Platform)
1 SMRT2 SMRT3 SMRT
Polymerase read bases (GB)11.1011.2810.60
Polymerase reads868,985811,704844,834
Polymerase read length (mean)12,78113,90412,556
Polymerase read N5023,75024,25022,750
Mean insert length (in bp)924910,2009446
Insert N5015,75016,25015,750
Details of short read sequencing
(Illumina platform)
Read Orientation-1Read Orientation-2
Mean read quality (Phred score)39.3538.02
Number of reads413,727,546413,727,546
% GC43.5743.65
% Q < 100.150.49
% Q 10–201.613.78
% Q 20–302.624.9
% Q > 3095.6290.83
Number of bases (GB)62.0591362.05913
Mean read length (bp)150.0150.0
Table 2. Details of genome size estimation of Commiphora wightii with reference standard Solanum lycopersicum using flow cytometry.
Table 2. Details of genome size estimation of Commiphora wightii with reference standard Solanum lycopersicum using flow cytometry.
Replicate 1Replicate 2Replicate 3Mean2C DNA Content (pg)Genome Size (Mb)
Peak MedianCV%Peak MedianCV%Peak MedianCV%
Reference standard
(Solanum lycopersicum)
103,4433.8899,0613.93104,7964.10102,433.31.96958.4
Commiphora wightii98,194.505.4596,8214.9695,0204.2096,678.51.85904.65
Table 3. Details of the assembled draft genome of Commiphora wightii showing the total number of contigs, their size range and total length.
Table 3. Details of the assembled draft genome of Commiphora wightii showing the total number of contigs, their size range and total length.
Size Range (bp)Number of ContigsTotal Length (bp)
≥023,8221,034,226,503
≥100023,8221,034,226,503
≥500022,2901,028,437,576
≥10,00019,4031,006,888,612
≥25,00011,910878,025,564
≥50,0005,974668,139,253
Table 4. Details of the orthologous sequences obtained through BUSCO analysis (Dependencies and versions: hmmsearch: 3.1, bbtools: 38.98, metaeuk: 6.a5d39d9, BUSCO: 5.4.2).
Table 4. Details of the orthologous sequences obtained through BUSCO analysis (Dependencies and versions: hmmsearch: 3.1, bbtools: 38.98, metaeuk: 6.a5d39d9, BUSCO: 5.4.2).
ParametersTotal Length (bp)Percentage (%)Lineage Dataset
Complete BUSCOs (C)42199.1Viridiplantae_odb10
(Creation date: 10 September 2020,
Number of Genomes: 57,
Number of BUSCOs: 425)
Complete and single-copy BUSCOs (S)13531.8
Complete and duplicated BUSCOs (D)28667.3
Fragmented BUSCOs (F)10.2
Missing BUSCOs (M)30.7
Total BUSCO groups searched425100
Complete BUSCOs (C)229398.6Eudicots_odb10
(Creation date: 10 September 2020,
Number of genomes: 31,
Number of BUSCOs: 2326)
Complete and single-copy BUSCOs (S)68629.5
Complete and duplicated BUSCOs (D)160769.1
Fragmented BUSCOs (F)140.6
Missing BUSCOs (M)190.8
Total BUSCO groups searched2326100
Complete BUSCOs (C)159398.7Embryophyta_odb10
(Creation date: 10 September 2020,
Number of genomes: 50,
Number of BUSCOs: 1614)
Complete and single-copy BUSCOs (S)46328.7
Complete and duplicated BUSCOs (D)113070.0
Fragmented BUSCOs (F)130.8
Missing BUSCOs (M)80.5
Total BUSCO groups searched1614100
Table 5. Summary of the assembled draft genome of Commiphora wightii.
Table 5. Summary of the assembled draft genome of Commiphora wightii.
ParametersMeasure
Estimated genome size (Gb)1.03
Chromosome number (2n)26
Total size of assembled contigs (Gb)32.98
Number of contigs107,221
Largest contigs (bp)1,627,014
No. of predicted genes31,187
N50 length of contigs (bp)74,387
N75 length of contigs (bp)36,142
GC content (%)35.6
Total size of transposable elements (Mb)342.35 (33.1%)
Table 6. Details of homology search for public domain phytosterol biosynthesis-associated genes in the predicted genes of Commiphora weightii.
Table 6. Details of homology search for public domain phytosterol biosynthesis-associated genes in the predicted genes of Commiphora weightii.
Query IDSubject IDPercentage of Identical MatchesAlignment LengthNumber of MismatchesNumber of Gap OpeningsStart of Alignment in QueryEnd of Alignment in QueryStart of Alignment in SubjectEnd of Alignment in SubjectExpected Value
sp|P38605|CAS1_ARATHg234.t178.357767127217582459810
NC_003071.7:c9726384-9723615_SQE2_ARATH_ [GeneID=816814]g116.t17534060112432262323135452.42 × 10−155
NC_015439.3:c46508678-46505935_HMGR_SOLLC_ [
GeneID=543702]
g892.t167.531467412410654026808.07 × 10−120
NW_023590956.1:3889228-3894037_SQE_JATCU_ [
GeneID=105630804]
g116.t165.224725133974137336035455.67 × 10−84
NC_015449.3:c67067036-67062030_CPI_SOLLC_ [
GeneID=100301930]
g451.t164.445160473345996546986.81 × 10−8
NC_003075.7:17743738-17746697_SQE3_ARATH_ [
GeneID=829932]
g116.t160.9455115711822546317335642.24 × 10−153
NC_015438.3:2174569-2178590_CYP51_SOLLC_ [
GeneID=100736446]
g546.t156.873863216663876248229641.01 × 10−240
NC_003075.7:16538189-16542024_SQS1_ARATH_ [
GeneID=829616]
g331.t152.9206253180524221582912.12 × 10−49
NC_012015.3:c22173595-22152025_LOC100254746_VITVI_ [
GeneID=100254746]
g1271.t152.4148444324196463281112600
NC_003070.9:28695760-28698852_HMG1_ARATH_ [
GeneID=843982]
g892.t151.76941791232724084049411.70 × 10−184
NC_015438.3:3419728-3429015_LOC101248602__SOLLC_ [
GeneID=101248602]
g1497.t148.28533330833313199420757.14 × 10−09
NC_003076.8:9690428-9693289_MK_ARATH_ [GeneID=832804]g117.t146.33741381112432355568659994.25 × 10−69
NC_003070.9:c29688800-29684236_BAS_ARATH_ [GeneID=844234]g314.t138.292719225645342210,22510,7713.15 × 10−156
NC_003070.9:20763844-20765823_LAS_ARATH_ [GeneID=842007]g1051.t1383821978383152815,77216,1133.60 × 10−57
NC_003074.8:c16517781-16512170_LAS1_ARATH_ [
GeneID=823649]
g234.t134.192028222197247163739734.25 × 10−119
NC_003075.7:16542242-16545194_SQS2_ARATH_ [
GeneID=829617]
g331.t129518119135842137783461.30 × 10−39
sp|Q39227|SMT2_ARATHg234.t187.243374301337416344990
sp|A0A0A1C3I2|HMGR1_PANGIg892.t180.47553865325673949410
sp|A0A3Q7HRZ6|MYC2_SOLLCg713.t160.197711207191686374744060
sp|Q9SI37|WRKY1_ARATHg355.t144.4842811288101374352337822.42 × 10−60
sp|Q39085|DIM_ARATHg585.t138.0439255211820856,77956,8690.0000861
sp|P45434|SSRA_ARATHg343.t133.3336936234942383040.48
sp|G1UB11|ERG5_CANALg337.t127.273517345131051194214424.77 × 10−50
Table 7. Details of synteny block analysis of assembled contigs of Commiphora weightii with reference genome, Citrus sinensis [Citrus sinensis cultivar Valencia sweet orange, DVS_A1.0; Chr1=NC_068556.1; Chr2=NC_068557.1; Chr3=NC_068558.1, Chr4=NC_068559.1; Chr5=NC_068560.1; Chr6=NC_068561.1; Chr7=NC_068562.1; Chr8=NC_068563.1 and Chr98=NC_068564.1}. The cut-off value of query coverage of assembled contigs was synteny block in the analysis.
Table 7. Details of synteny block analysis of assembled contigs of Commiphora weightii with reference genome, Citrus sinensis [Citrus sinensis cultivar Valencia sweet orange, DVS_A1.0; Chr1=NC_068556.1; Chr2=NC_068557.1; Chr3=NC_068558.1, Chr4=NC_068559.1; Chr5=NC_068560.1; Chr6=NC_068561.1; Chr7=NC_068562.1; Chr8=NC_068563.1 and Chr98=NC_068564.1}. The cut-off value of query coverage of assembled contigs was synteny block in the analysis.
Reference Genome (C. sinensis)Total Size (bp)Total Mapped Query (bp)Number of Syntenic Blocks% of Syntenic Coverage
cpGenome160,129160,0362499.9
mtGenome640,906199,2726831.1
Chr124,849,987501,4593112.0
Chr232,942,340882,0515542.7
Chr352,308,633830,9965061.6
Chr429,627,743552,5543481.9
Chr538,998,145494,7952991.3
Chr626,176,707554,3253312.1
Chr729,493,366597,5033532.0
Chr830,582,302436,3882801.4
Chr933,998,288483,9192831.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banerjee, R.P.; Tiwari, G.J.; Joshi, B.; Jena, S.N.; Sidhu, O.P.; Meena, B.; Rana, T.S.; Barik, S.K. De Novo Hybrid Assembled Draft Genome of Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari Reveals Key Enzymes Involved in Phytosterol Biosynthesis. Life 2023, 13, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030662

AMA Style

Banerjee RP, Tiwari GJ, Joshi B, Jena SN, Sidhu OP, Meena B, Rana TS, Barik SK. De Novo Hybrid Assembled Draft Genome of Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari Reveals Key Enzymes Involved in Phytosterol Biosynthesis. Life. 2023; 13(3):662. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banerjee, Rudra Prasad, Gopal Ji Tiwari, Babita Joshi, Satya Narayan Jena, Om Prakash Sidhu, Baleshwar Meena, Tikam S. Rana, and Saroj K. Barik. 2023. "De Novo Hybrid Assembled Draft Genome of Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari Reveals Key Enzymes Involved in Phytosterol Biosynthesis" Life 13, no. 3: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030662

APA Style

Banerjee, R. P., Tiwari, G. J., Joshi, B., Jena, S. N., Sidhu, O. P., Meena, B., Rana, T. S., & Barik, S. K. (2023). De Novo Hybrid Assembled Draft Genome of Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhandari Reveals Key Enzymes Involved in Phytosterol Biosynthesis. Life, 13(3), 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop