Next Article in Journal
Social Media Use and Academic Performance in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Moderated Chain Mediation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Studyholism and Attachment Style: A Study among Italian University Students
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Behavioral Sciences
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/bs14100866
behavsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Internet Use on Happiness in China: Mediating Effects of Environmental Quality Perception and Moderating Role of Sense of Environmental Security

by
Xiaorui Huang
1 and
Mingqi Fu
2,*
1
School of International Relations, Huaqiao University, 668 Jimei Road, Xiamen 361021, China
2
School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100866
Submission received: 15 August 2024 / Revised: 22 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 25 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The “Constructive” Side of Media: Promoting Prosocial Behavior, Well-Being, and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aims to comprehensively examine the effects of different types of Internet use and happiness while considering the mediating role of environmental quality perception and the moderating role of a sense of environmental security. Drawing on the uses and gratifications theory, negativity bias, and social cognitive theory, the study investigates the mediating role of environmental quality perception and the moderating role of environmental security in the above relationship. Using data from 3162 respondents in the 2021 Chinese Social Survey (CSS) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study finds that Internet use for information and educational purposes significantly enhances happiness, with environmental quality perception acting as a mediator. Moreover, a moderating effect of environmental security was observed in the relationship between Internet use for educational purposes and national environmental quality perception. Specifically, the interaction between study-related Internet use and the sense of environmental security significantly and positively predicted national environmental quality perception. These findings highlight the complex interaction between Internet use, environmental factors, and happiness, offering insights into policy interventions aimed at improving Internet access and environmental awareness to enhance public mental health outcomes in China.

1. Introduction

The rapid proliferation of Internet use has fundamentally transformed daily life worldwide, with China at the forefront of this digital revolution. By the end of 2023, Internet penetration had reached 77.5%, encompassing over 1.092 billion users [1], making China the largest Internet user in the world. Internet usage spans various activities, such as social media, chats, and information-seeking, fulfilling both informational and social needs [2]. This unprecedented digital expansion has facilitated access to information, reshaped social interactions [3,4], and significantly impacted economic activities [5,6,7]. However, it has also introduced challenges, including Internet addiction [8,9] and exposure to negative content [10,11]. For example, many Chinese users under the age of 18 exhibit signs of excessive Internet use and dependency [12]. Despite these issues, China’s ranking on the World Happiness Index improved from 72nd in 2022 to 60th in 2024 [13], suggesting a potential link between the rapid development of information technology and national well-being. This calls for further exploration of the relationship between Internet use and happiness.
A growing body of literature has explored the relationship between Internet use and happiness in China [14,15]. However, the findings remain contradictory. Some studies highlight a positive correlation, suggesting that Internet use enhances social capital [16] and mental health. In contrast, other research links Internet use to negative psychosocial outcomes, such as loneliness and depression [17,18], which can affect individuals’ perceptions of happiness [19,20]. Given these mixed outcomes, researchers increasingly emphasize the importance of examining patterns of Internet use [21]. For instance, studies during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed the harmful effects of social media exposure on mental health [22]. Additionally, behavioral factors like environmental perception have emerged as key mediators between Internet use and mental health [23]. As individuals engage with the Internet, they are exposed to environmental information that shapes their attitudes toward environmental issues [24], which, in turn, can influence their mental health [25]. These findings underscore the complex between Internet use, environmental factors, and happiness.
Perceived environmental quality (EQP) may serve as an important mediator in the relationship between Internet use and happiness. Drawing on uses and gratifications (U&G) theory and negativity bias theory, individuals seek environmental information online to understand their surroundings, which shapes their perceptions [24]. Positive environmental information can improve psychological outcomes, while negative information may diminish them [26]. However, the mechanisms through which Internet use affects EQP and happiness are not fully understood. On one hand, researchers suggest that Internet use can negatively impact environmental satisfaction [27,28], as people often focus on environmental degradation [29]. Empirical evidence further confirms that the Internet amplifies residents’ environmental perceptions [30]. On the other hand, many studies emphasize the positive effects of perceived environmental quality on mental health [31,32] through mechanisms such as stress reduction [33,34] and cognitive restoration [35,36]. However, some findings point to a negative impact of environmental perception on well-being [37], revealing the complexity of this relationship and the need for further investigation. This study aims to explore how EQP mediates the relationship between different types of Internet use and happiness.
In addition to EQP’s mediating role, its effects may vary across individuals depending on moderating factors. One such factor is the sense of environmental security, which refers to the psychological need for safety and certainty in one’s environment [38]. This need significantly shapes people’s environmental perceptions and behaviors [32]. According to social cognitive theory, human behavior is a product of interactions among personal factors, environmental influences, and behavioral patterns [39]. As both a cognitive and emotional state, environmental security may influence how individuals interpret online environmental information, potentially moderating the impact of Internet use on EQP. Moreover, findings from Western contexts may not fully apply to China, where traditional values and rapid digital expansion influence Internet use behaviors [40]. Given the Chinese government’s efforts to address environmental issues [41], understanding how environmental security moderates the relationship between Internet use and happiness is essential. This study seeks to clarify these dynamics and deepen our understanding of how different types of Internet use affect EQP and happiness.
Although prior research has largely focused on the direct link between Internet use and happiness, there is a lack of understanding regarding the mediating and moderating mechanisms involved. To address this gap, the present study aims to examine how different types of Internet use affect happiness in China, specifically testing whether EQP mediates this relationship and whether a sense of environmental security moderates it.
This study makes several contributions to the literature. First, it is among the few to explore the mediating role of EQP between different forms of Internet use and happiness in China, a context characterized by rapid urbanization and environmental challenges [42]. Given China’s unique cultural emphasis on social status and the associated psychological stress from Internet addiction [40], this research expands the limited non-Western studies on this topic [43]. Second, while previous research mainly addresses the direct impact of Internet use on mental health, this paper investigates EQP as a key mediator, using negativity bias theory to uncover less understood mechanisms [44]. Finally, by introducing environmental security as a moderating variable within a social cognitive theory, the study provides new insights into the direct and indirect pathways through which Internet use influences happiness.

2. Theoretical Framework

Building on uses and gratifications theory, negativity bias theory, and social cognitive theory, we have developed a comprehensive theoretical framework to explore the relationships between Internet use, perceptions of environmental quality, and happiness among the Chinese population. Our innovative research model offers a unique perspective by focusing on the mediating role of subjective environmental quality perception and the moderating effect of the sense of environmental security. Through this framework, we explain how different patterns of Internet use can shape perceptions of environmental quality, ultimately influencing happiness (Figure 1).

2.1. Uses and Gratifications (U&G) Theory

According to the U&G theory, individuals actively choose media to satisfy specific social and psychological needs, such as seeking information, entertainment, personal identity, and companionship [26]. In the case of Internet use, people engage with the medium to meet these needs, which can enhance their happiness [45]. Research has shown that Internet use has shifted individuals from being passive consumers of information to active seekers, empowering them to take greater control of their lives [46] and, in turn, boosting their well-being. Different patterns of Internet use—such as information gathering, entertainment, or social interaction—produce varied effects on happiness [47]. For example, using the Internet for information acquisition can improve efficiency, reduce information asymmetry, and increase access to diverse services and opportunities, thus creating positive welfare effects [48]. Based on this, we propose the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1a.
Internet use is positively associated with happiness.
Hypothesis 1b.
Different types of Internet use have varying impacts on happiness.

2.2. Negativity Bias Theory

Research indicates that people are more likely to focus on negative information than positive or neutral information [49,50,51]. This tendency, known as negativity bias, is an adaptive response that helps individuals recognize and avoid potential threats [51]. On the Internet, users are often drawn to negative content, especially in the context of social information exchange [52]. Numerous studies have linked negativity bias to increased levels of depression, anxiety, and a pessimistic outlook on life and the future [53]. In the case of environmental information, individuals may pay more attention to negative reports about environmental quality, leading them to perceive worsening conditions, which can decrease their happiness [54]. Thus, we hypothesize the following:
Hypothesis 2.
Perceived environmental quality serves as a negative mediator in the relationship between Internet use and happiness.

2.3. Social Cognitive Theory

Social cognitive theory suggests that human behavior and emotions are influenced by both personal beliefs and environmental factors [55]. A key factor in this process is the sense of environmental security, which moderates how individuals interpret and respond to environmental information encountered online. Those with a high sense of environmental security are more likely to interpret negative environmental news positively, thereby preserving a favorable perception of the environment and mitigating the adverse effects of such information on their happiness. Additionally, this theory emphasizes that individuals adopt different coping strategies when facing environmental stress [39,56]. Individuals with stronger environmental security tend to adopt proactive coping strategies, such as seeking solutions or support, which can reduce the impact of negative environmental information on happiness. Therefore, we hypothesize the following:
Hypothesis 3.
The sense of environmental security moderates the relationship between Internet use, environmental quality perception, and happiness. Specifically, a higher sense of environmental security weakens the negative impact of Internet use on environmental quality perception, thereby reducing its adverse effect on happiness.

3. Methods

3.1. Data Sources and Respondents

This study utilized data from the 2021 wave of the Chinese Social Survey (CSS), a nationwide survey initiated in 2005 by the Institute of Sociology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The CSS aims to track social changes in China by collecting longitudinal data on labor markets, family life, and public attitudes. The survey aims to provide detailed and scientific foundational data for social science research and government decision-making [57]. It provides a nationally representative sample designed to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics, employment status, living conditions, and social engagement of individuals aged 18 to 69. The 2021 survey employed a multistage, stratified, probability-proportional-to-size cluster sampling method, gathering responses from 10,136 participants across 592 villages and communities in 30 provinces and autonomous regions of China [58]. For this study, data related to Internet use, environmental factors, and happiness were selected. After removing nonstandard and incomplete responses, the final sample size was 3162. Demographic information, including age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and satisfaction with social welfare services, was collected to provide a comprehensive understanding of the participant pool. A total of 55.63% of the analyzed respondents were female, and 44.37% were male, reflecting the gender distribution in the sample. Regarding age, the average age was 41.407 years. Regarding the distribution of socioeconomic status (SES), 39.60% of participants were reported as middle level, 32.61% as upper-middle level, and 20.84% as upper level, indicating a predominantly middle-to-upper SES distribution in the sample.

3.2. Measures

Internet use was assessed by the frequency of engagement in various online activities, including browsing current affairs and political news, entertainment, chatting, business, and study, as identified in previous studies [59,60]. To obtain information, the CSS 2021 asked the following question: “How frequently do you use the Internet for the following activities, including browsing current affairs and political news, entertainment, chatting and making friends, business or work and study?”. Participants rated each activity on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (“never”) to 6 (“nearly every day”). The frequency scores for browsing news (M 4.467, SD 0.48), playing (M 4.916, SD 1.591), chatting (M 4.85, SD 1.667), business (M 2.494, SD 2.128), and study (M 3.139, SD 2.045) were included.
Happiness was measured using a single-item, self-rating scale adapted from previous studies [61,62] and validated in Chinese [63]. Participants answered the question, “Do you feel happiness?” in CSS2021, and it is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater happiness. Single-item measures are commonly employed in happiness research [64,65] and have shown good concurrent validity [61] with the Oxford Happiness Inventory [66].
Environmental quality perception (EQP) was measured by respondents’ cognitive assessment of both the environmental quality in China and within their local communities, referring to previous research [29], which has been validated in Chinese. The first indicator (EQP1) asked, “What is your perception of China’s environmental quality in a global context?”. Responses ranged on a 5-point scale (1 = “low” to 5 = “high”). The second indicator (EQP2) was derived from the question, “How would you rate the environmental quality in your residential area?”, using a 10-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the surrounding environment.
The sense of environmental security was evaluated based on respondents’ ratings of their perceived environmental security level and has been validated in Chinese [67]. The China Social Survey 2021 asked respondents the question, “How secure do you feel about the current level of environmental safety in society?”. Participants rated this on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (“very unsafe”) to 4 (“very safe”), reflecting individuals’ feelings of insecurity in relation to their environmental surroundings.
Covariates included age, age square, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and satisfaction with social welfare services, as these have been linked to happiness in previous studies [68,69,70]. The control variables included age (M = 41.407, SD = 14.12), gender (M = 0.444, SD = 0.497), SES (M = 3.668, SD = 0.894), and satisfaction with social welfare services (M = 7.265, SD = 2.162).

3.3. Statistical Strategies

Descriptive analyses were performed for all variables. Subsequently, we used a multivariate regression model to examine the relationship between various types of Internet use, EQP, and individuals’ happiness. This analysis controlled for various covariates, including age, age square, gender, SES, and satisfaction with social welfare services. Regressions were conducted for the total sample, with standardized coefficients and standard error reported. Additionally, to explore the mediating role of EQP and the moderating role of the sense of environmental security, we verify various moderated mediation models based on the bootstrap method to obtain point estimates of the coefficients. By taking 5000 bootstrap samples, the robust standard error and bootstrap confidence interval of parameter estimation were obtained. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 17.0.

4. Results

4.1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 1 summarizes the descriptive statistics for the 3162 respondents. The average age was 41.407 years (SD = 13.705). On average, participants rated their satisfaction with social welfare services at 7.265, while their socioeconomic status (SES) averaged 3.67, indicating a level above the median. In 2021, most respondents used the Internet multiple times per week for activities such as gaming, chatting, and news browsing. The mean score for EQP1 and EQP2 were 3.826 and 7.427, respectively. The overall happiness level was relatively high, with a mean of 3.354 (SD = 0.649). The average sense of environmental security was 3.074.
Table 2 shows significant correlations between Internet use, EQP1, EQP2, sense of environmental security, and happiness. Internet use for education had a negative association with EQP1 but was positively related to both EQP2 and happiness. Both EQP1 and EQP2 were also positively correlated with happiness. Moreover, a stronger sense of environmental security was positively linked to EQP1, EQP2, and happiness.

4.2. Multivariate Regression Analysis

As presented in Table 3, the results from regression models suggest that happiness is influenced by many factors, including types of Internet use, EQP, sense of environmental security, and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. These findings imply that digital behavior, environmental perceptions, and socioeconomic status all contribute significantly to happiness.
Table 3 explores the relationship between different types of Internet use, EQP1, EQP2, sense of environmental security, and individuals’ happiness across five models (Models 1–5). Columns (1), (3), (5), (7), and (9) show the impact of various types of Internet use on happiness, incorporating EQP1 and the control variables. Meanwhile, Columns (2), (4), (6), (8), and (10) assess the effect of different types of Internet use on happiness, introducing EQP2 and the control variables.
Model 1 and Model 5 reveal that frequent Internet use, particularly for browsing news and learning, positively correlates with higher happiness, supporting Hypotheses 1a and 1b. EQP1’s impact on happiness is positive and statistically significant at the 5% level, and EQP2’s effect on happiness is also significantly positive, aligning with the previous finding [71]. Additionally, a strong sense of environmental security significantly enhances happiness, as evidenced by significant coefficients in Columns (1) (beta = 0.108, p < 0.001), (2) (beta = 0.101, p < 0.001), (9) (beta = 0.107, p < 0.001), and (10) (beta = 0.100, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the critical role environmental security plays in shaping happiness.
The estimation results for the influence of the control variables on happiness basically conform to previous findings [29]. Specifically, males and individuals with higher SES reported lower levels of happiness, while greater satisfaction with social welfare services was linked to increased happiness.

4.3. Testing the Mediating Effects of EQP1 and EQP2

This study posits that the different types of Internet use, such as news browsing and studying, influence happiness through the mediating roles of EQP1 and EQP2. Panel A of Table 4 shows that Internet use for studying has a significant negative effect on EQP1 (beta = −0.016, p < 0.05), while EQP1 significantly enhances happiness (beta = 0.052, p < 0.001). When both study-related internet use and EQP1 are included, Internet use for studying significantly positively impacts happiness (beta = 0.017, p < 0.01). The Bootstrap method was used with 5000 samples, with regression results shown in Panel C of Table 4. The bias-corrected 95% confidence interval for EQP1’s mediating effect is [−0.0020729, −0.0000925], excluding zero and confirming EQP1’s significant mediating role.
Panel B presents results for EQP2’s mediating effect. Internet use for studying significantly affects EQP2 (beta = 0.031, p < 0.10), and EQP2 positively influences happiness (beta = 0.031, p < 0.001). Even with both variables included, study-related Internet use continues to significantly impact happiness, though the coefficient is reduced (beta = 0.015, p < 0.01). The bias-corrected 95% confidence interval for EQP2’s mediating effect is [0.0000344, 0.002255], confirming a significant mediating role for EQP2 and supporting Hypothesis 2.

4.4. Testing for Moderated Mediation

Table 5 illustrates the moderating effect of environmental security on the mediation process. The interaction between study-related Internet use and environmental security significantly predicts EQP1 (beta = 0.0280, p < 0.05), indicating that environmental security moderates the first half of the mediation between studying and happiness, supporting Hypothesis 3. The model fit indices indicate good fit (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.769, RMSEA = 0.067, SRMR = 0.011). The specific model is shown in Figure 2.
To further elucidate how the sense of environmental security moderates the influence of online education on happiness, we classified the sense of environmental security into high, medium, and low groups based on one standard deviation. We then calculated the mediating effect of the sense of environmental security between study-related Internet use and happiness, along with its 95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI) (Table 6). The mediating effect of EQP1 in the high sense of environmental security group (beta = 0.994, CI = [0.264, 1.584]) was found to be stronger than that in the low sense of environmental security group (beta = 0.740, CI = [0.213, 1.224]).
Based on a comprehensive analysis of the results, the moderated mediation model proposed in this study is supported. Internet use for educational purposes not only directly predicts happiness but also does so indirectly through the mediation of EQP1. Moreover, the first half of this mediation is moderated by the sense of environmental security. To better understand the interaction effect between Internet use for studying and the sense of environmental security, we categorized the sense of environmental security into high, medium, and low groups and plotted a simple effects analysis graph (see Figure 3).
The simple slope test indicates that when the sense of environmental security is low, Internet use for studying negatively affects EQP1 (beta = −0.031, p = 0.004); when the sense of environmental security is moderate, the impact still remains negative but weak (beta = −0.014, p = 0.062); and when the sense of environmental security is high, the predictive effect becomes non-significant (beta = 0.002, p = 0.806). These results indicate that individuals with low environmental security may experience a negative impact on their perception of environmental quality from study-related Internet use, but this effect diminishes as their sense of security increases. This highlights the complex interaction between digital behavior, environmental perceptions, and security in shaping happiness.

5. Discussion

The existing literature offers limited insight into the role of environmental factors in the relationship between Internet use and happiness. This study addresses this gap by examining how environmental quality perception (EQP) mediates and how the sense of environmental security moderates the effects of different types of Internet use on happiness. We apply the U&G theory, negativity bias theory, and social cognitive theory to explore these dynamics, yielding several findings worthy of discussion.
First, we found that individuals who frequently use the Internet for browsing news and educational purposes experience higher levels of happiness. This result is consistent with previous research [17] on the complex relationship between Internet use and mental health. However, this study goes further by showing the distinct effects of specific online activities, particularly news consumption and educational engagement. News browsing reduces information asymmetry and search costs, providing access to a broader range of information, affordable products, and job opportunities, all of which enhance mental well-being [72,73]. Likewise, using the Internet for educational purposes offers flexibility, enabling people to develop life skills, improve self-care, and strengthen social relationships, contributing to increased happiness [74].
Second, the study discovered that EQP mediated the link between study-related Internet use and happiness, offering new insights into how Internet use shapes perceptions of the environment and happiness. Specifically, Internet use for studying was linked to heightened awareness of local environmental quality but reduced perceptions of national environmental conditions. This suggests that study-related Internet use helps people focus on their immediate surroundings, aligning with their goals [60], while national environmental issues, often framed negatively by the media, lead to lower perceptions of broader environmental quality due to negativity bias [75].
Third, our study found that the sense of environmental security moderated the indirect relationship between study-related Internet use and happiness through national EQP, consistent with previous research on environmental risk vulnerability [76]. This influence may occur through two channels. From the emotional regulation perspective, a high sense of environmental security helps individuals effectively manage their emotions, reducing the anxiety and stress caused by Internet information and fostering positive cognition [77]. Conversely, individuals with low environmental security are more susceptible to negative information online, resulting in negative perceptions of environmental quality and decreased happiness [78]. From the self-efficacy perspective, individuals with low environmental security often have lower self-efficacy, making them more prone to frustration, which further diminishes their perception of environmental quality and happiness [79]. These findings highlight the complex interactions between digital behavior, environmental perceptions, and security feelings in shaping individuals’ happiness.
This study makes significant contributions to the current scholarly literature. First, it uses micro-level data from China to provide empirical evidence on how environmental factors, such as EQP and environmental security, influence the relationship between different types of Internet use and happiness. By doing so, we address a key gap in the literature, demonstrating how specific Internet activities impact happiness via these environmental factors. Second, this study proposes a new analytical framework by integrating U&G theory, negativity bias theory, and social cognitive theory. This framework extends the application of these theories to environmental contexts, offering a fresh perspective on how negative media content influences environmental perceptions and happiness. While traditional U&G theory focuses on how individuals actively use media to meet their needs [26], our study shows that it also applies to the processing of environmental information encountered online. Media negativity bias affects environmental quality perceptions, with potential negative impacts on happiness. Our findings broaden the scope of U&G theory, encompassing both active information-seeking behaviors and passive information processing. Third, by incorporating U&G theory, negativity bias theory, and social cognitive theory, this study validates the applicability of these theoretical frameworks to understanding how digital behaviors influence happiness. Our analysis emphasizes the role of environmental factors in shaping the psychological outcomes of Internet use, offering a more comprehensive view of the interplay between online activities and happiness.
This research offers important practical implications. First, the study demonstrates that Internet use, particularly for educational and information-seeking purposes, can positively impact happiness, supporting previous findings that link Internet use to mental health benefits [14]. Policymakers should consider enhancing access to high-quality online educational resources and creating digital platforms that provide supportive, uplifting content to promote well-being. Second, the findings show that environmental quality perception (EQP) mediates the relationship between study-related Internet use and happiness. This underscores the need to address how study-related internet activities affect both local and national environmental perceptions. Policymakers should focus on increasing public awareness and education on environmental issues through digital platforms. Developing online resources that offer accurate, constructive information about local and national environmental conditions can help balance public perceptions. Incorporating environmental education into digital literacy programs can also empower individuals to understand better and positively influence their views on residential and national environmental quality. Third, the study suggests that fostering a strong sense of environmental security can decrease the negative impact of study-related Internet use on national environmental perceptions. Government agencies should collaborate with multiple stakeholders to create educational programs that build emotional resilience [80] and self-efficacy in relation to environmental issues. By equipping individuals with skills to manage environmental risks and uncertainties, these programs can enhance their perceptions of environmental quality and, in turn, improve their overall happiness.

6. Conclusions

This study, based on a sample of 3162 adults from China, is among the first to explore the mediating role of environmental quality perception (EQP) and the moderating effect of environmental security in the relationship between various types of Internet use and happiness. The findings indicate that Internet use for educational purposes is positively associated with increased happiness. This relationship is partially mediated by improved perceptions of residential environmental quality and reduced perceptions of national environmental quality, with environmental security acting as a key moderating factor. These results highlight the significant influence of environmental factors on mental health outcomes, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving information and communication technologies.
However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, as a cross-sectional study, it provides valuable insights into the mediating processes [81] but cannot establish causality. Future research should employ longitudinal data to deepen our understanding of how Internet use impacts happiness over time. Additionally, this study was limited to computer-based Internet use due to the available data, which restricts the scope of the analysis. Future research could broaden this perspective by examining the effects of various forms of Internet use, such as social media, mobile applications, and generative AI, to explore how Internet use contributes to happiness from an environmental perspective.

Author Contributions

Data curation, X.H.; Formal analysis, M.F.; Writing—original draft, X.H.; Writing—review and editing, M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “The National Social Science Fund of China” (grant number: 21CGL059) and “The Key Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science of Chinese Ministry of Education” (grant number: 22JJD630016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The CSS survey was conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences under the leadership of Li Peilin, to whom the author is grateful for data support; however, the author is solely responsible for the content of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. The 53rd Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. In China Internet Network Information Center. Available online: https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2024/0322/c88-10964.html (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  2. Blank, G.; Lutz, C. Benefits and harms from Internet use: A differentiated analysis of Great Britain. New Media Soc. 2018, 20, 618–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y.; Hayat, Z. The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011, 27, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ibarra, F.; Baez, M.; Cernuzzi, L.; Casati, F. A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: Loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness. J. Healthc. Eng. 2020, 2020, 2036842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fernandes, A.M.; Mattoo, A.; Nguyen, H.; Schiffbauer, M. The internet and Chinese exports in the pre-Alibaba era. J. Dev. Econ. 2019, 138, 57–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Visser, R. The effect of the internet on the margins of trade. Inf. Econ. Policy 2019, 46, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maurseth, P. The effect of the internet on economic growth: Counter-evidence from cross-country panel data. Econ. Lett. 2018, 172, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.Y.; Sun, Y.; Meng, S.Q.; Bao, Y.P.; Cheng, J.L.; Chang, X.W.; Ran, M.-S.; Sun, Y.-K.; Kosten, T.; Strang, J.; et al. Internet addiction increases in the general population during COVID-19: Evidence from China. Am. J. Addict. 2021, 30, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, M.; Zhu, W.; Sun, X.; Huang, L. Internet addiction and child physical and mental health: Evidence from panel dataset in China. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 309, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, C.; Li, K.; Zhang, X. Why do I take deviant disclosure behavior on internet platforms? An explanation based on the neutralization theory. Inf. Process. Manag. 2022, 59, 102785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.; Ngai, E.W.T.; Wu, P.; Wu, C. Fake news on the internet: A literature review, synthesis and directions for future research. Internet Res. 2022, 32, 1662–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. The 5th Report on National Survey on Internet Use by Minors in China. In Communist Youth League. Available online: https://qnzz.youth.cn/qckc/202312/P020231223672191910610.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  13. World Happiness Report. 2024. Available online: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2024/ (accessed on 1 August 2024).
  14. Sun, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, Y. The impact of internet use on residents’ happiness in China. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1188259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Y.; Huang, Y. Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Adults’ Internet Use and Happiness: The Mediating Roles of Loneliness and Social Engagement. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2021, 40, 1846–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jing, R.; Jin, G.Z.; Guo, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, L. The association between constant and new Internet use and depressive symptoms among older adults in China: The role of structural social capital. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 138, 107480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nie, P.; Sousa-Poza, A.; Nimrod, G. Internet use and subjective well-being in China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2017, 132, 489–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wirtz, D.; Tucker, A.; Briggs, C.; Schoemann, A.M. How and why social media affect subjective well-being: Multi-site use and social comparison as predictors of change across time. J. Happiness Stud. 2021, 22, 1673–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Ye, Y.; Li, D. How the media construct happiness under cultural perspective in China: Through collectivistic and individualistic values. Soc. Sci. Q. 2021, 102, 2619–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, W.; Liu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, P.; Ding, X.; Wang, G. Academics–Athletics Conflict and College Athletes’ Well-Being: The Mediating Effect of Negative Emotions and the Moderating Effect of Life Motivation. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Blank, G.; Groselj, D. Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2014, 17, 417–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Obrenovic, B.; Godinic, D.; Du, G.; Khudaykulov, A.; Gan, H. Identity Disturbance in the Digital Era during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Adverse Effects of Social Media and Job Stress. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yi, C.; Han, J.; Long, C. Does Internet use increase public perception of environmental pollution?—Evidence from China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2023, 166, 665–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gong, W.; Du, Z. Unity of knowledge and action? From perception of environmental issues to environmentally friendly behavior: The moderating role of environmental knowledge, media use, and informal network communication. J. China Univ. Geosci. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 19, 72–83. [Google Scholar]
  25. Acoba, E.F. Social support and mental health: The mediating role of perceived stress. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 1330720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Katz, E.; Blumler, J.G.; Gurevitch, M. Uses and gratifications research. Public Opin. Q. 1973, 37, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, S.; Zeng, R.; Yi, C. Media use and environmental public service satisfaction—An empirical analysis based on China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Robinson, M. Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon”. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1976, 70, 409–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Cheng, M.; Yu, N.N. Internet use and lower life satisfaction: The mediating effect of environmental quality perception. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 176, 106725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Y.; Li, Y. Online amplification of air pollution risk perception: The moderating role of affect in information. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2018, 21, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kensinger, E.A. Negative emotion enhances memory accuracy: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 16, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, X.; He, F. The environmental pollution perception of residents in coal mining areas: A case study in the Hancheng mine area, Shaanxi Province, China. Environ. Manag. 2012, 50, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stigsdotter, U.K.; Ekholm, O.; Schipperijn, J.; Toftager, M.; Kamper-Jorgensen, F.; Randrup, T.B. Health promoting outdoor environments–Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scand. J. Public Health 2010, 38, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wells, N.M.; Evans, G.W. Nearby Nature: A Buffer of Life Stress among Rural Children. Environ. Behav. 2003, 35, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berman, M.G.; Jonides, J.; Kaplan, S. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. van den Berg, A.E.; Maas, J.; Verheij, R.A.; Groenewegen, P.P. Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 70, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Porumbescu, G.A. Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liotta, P.H. (Ed.) Achieving Environmental Security: Ecosystem Services and Human Welfare; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shanklin, R.; Santoro, M.A. Traditional Chinese Culture and Its Impact on Modern Business Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics; Poff, D.C., Michalos, A.C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, X. Factors influencing the environmental satisfaction of local residents in the coal mining area, China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 120, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, Z.N.; Chen, H.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, H. The dynamic relationship between environmental pollution, economic development and public health: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, N.; Kirkup, G. Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Comput. Educ. 2007, 48, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kross, E.; Verduyn, P.; Demiralp, E.; Park, J.; Lee, D.S.; Lin, N.; Shablack, H.; Jonides, J.; Ybarra, O. Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lin, Y.H.; Chu, M.G. Online communication self-disclosure and intimacy development on Facebook: The perspective of uses and gratifications theory. Online Inf. Rev. 2021, 45, 1167–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Graham, C.; Nikolova, M. Does access to information technology make people happier? Insights from well-being surveys from around the world. J. Socio-Econ. 2013, 44, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Király, O.; Potenza, M.N.; Stein, D.J.; King, D.L.; Hodgins, D.C.; Saunders, J.B.; Griffiths, M.D.; Gjoneska, B.; Billieux, J.; Brand, M.; et al. Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance. Compr. Psychiatry 2020, 100, 152180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lu, H.; Wang, J. Digital gap or information welfare: The effect of internet use on individual subjective well-being in China. Econ. Perspect. 2020, 2, 59–73. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, J.; Cheng, M.; Mei, R.; Wang, F. Internet use and individuals’ environmental quality evaluation: Evidence from China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gollan, J.K.; Connolly, M.; Buchanan, A.; Hoxha, D.; Rosebrock, L.; Cacioppo, J.; Csernansky, J.; Wang, X. Neural substrates of negativity bias in women with and without major depression. Biol. Psychol. 2015, 109, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rozin, P.; Royzman, E.B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 5, 296–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bebbington, K.; Macleod, C.; Ellison, T.M.; Fay, N. The sky is falling: Evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2017, 38, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, Z.Y.; Zhong, X.M.; Peng, Q.; Chen, B.; Mai, N.K.; Ning, Y.P. Negative bias in expression-related mismatch negativity (MMN) in emitted late-life depression: An event-related potential study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 95, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zheng, J.J.; Liu, C.; Li, C.Z. The impact of environmental pollution on the happiness of Chinese residents: An empirical analysis based on CGSS. J. Wuhan Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2015, 68, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bandura, A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1999, 3, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schwarzer, R.; Knoll, N. Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. Int. J. Psychol. 2007, 42, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chinese Social Survey (CSS). Available online: http://css.cssn.cn/css_sy/ (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  58. Chinese Social Survey (CSS). 2021. Available online: http://css.cssn.cn/css_sy/zlysj/lnsj/202301/t20230128_5584406.html (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  59. Castellacci, F.; Tveito, V. Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 308–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hofer, M.; Hargittai, E.; Büchi, M.; Seifert, A. Older adults’ online information seeking and subjective well-being: The moderating role of internet skills. Int. J. Commun. 2019, 13, 4426–4443. [Google Scholar]
  61. Abdel-Khalek, A.M. Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2006, 34, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abdel-Khalek, A.M. Happiness among Kuwaiti college students. J. Happiness Stud. 2004, 5, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, Z.; Leng, C. The Impact of Internet use on residents’ happiness: Empirical evidence from CSS2013. Econ. Rev. 2018, 1, 78–90. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim, J.; Heo, J.; Lee, I.H. Predicting Personal Growth and Happiness by Using Serious Leisure Model. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 122, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lyubomirsky, S.; King, L.; Diener, E. The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success? Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131, 803–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Argyle, M.; Martin, M.; Lu, L. Testing for Stress and Happiness: The Role of Social and Cognitive Factors. In Stress and Emotion; Spielberger, C.D., Sarason, I.G., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; pp. 173–187. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yi, C.; Huang, Z. The Impact of Internet Use on Urban Residents’ Perception of Environmental Security. Empir. Soc. Sci. 2021, 8, 67–91. [Google Scholar]
  68. Cheng, X.F.; Ge, T.S.; Cosco, T.D. Internet use and life satisfaction among Chinese older adults: The mediating effects of social interaction. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, N.; He, M. Social security satisfaction and people’s subjective well-being in China: The serial mediation effect of social fairness and social trust. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 855530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, W.; Niu, G.F.; Zhang, D.J.; Fan, C.Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, Z.K. Socioeconomic status and life satisfaction in Chinese adolescents: Analysis of self-esteem as a mediator and optimism as a moderator. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2016, 95, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, M.; Sun, X. Study on the impact of air pollution control on urban resident’ happiness from microscopic perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 1307–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hall, R.H. Internet Use and Happiness: An Updated Review of Literature. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, 26–31 July 2019; Stephanidis, C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 1034, pp. 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goolsbee, A.; Klenow, P.J. Valuing consumer products by the time spent using them: An application to the internet. Am. Econ. Rev. 2006, 96, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gray, A.L.; Moore, E.W. Understanding the relationship between sexual identity, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and online community use. Mod. Psychol. Stud. 2018, 23, 4. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, J.; Cheng, M.; Wei, X.; Gong, X.; Zhang, S. Internet use and the satisfaction with governmental environmental protection: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Barnett, J. Environmental Security. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ney, S.M. Environmental Security: A Critical Overview. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 1999, 12, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gross, J.J.; John, O.P. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85, 348–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pajares, F. Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Rev. Educ. Res. 1996, 66, 543–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, Y.; Obrenovic, B.; Kamotho, D.W.; Godinic, D.; Ostic, D. Enhancing Job Performance: The Critical Roles of Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Trust in Supervisor. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. MacKinnon, D.P. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis; Lawrence Erlbaum: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Behavsci 14 00866 g001
Figure 1. The research model.
Figure 1. The research model.
Behavsci 14 00866 g001
Behavsci 14 00866 g002
Figure 2. The Moderated mediated model. Note: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. The Moderated mediated model. Note: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Behavsci 14 00866 g002
Behavsci 14 00866 g003
Figure 3. Moderating effect of the sense of environmental security on Internet use of studying and EQP1.
Figure 3. Moderating effect of the sense of environmental security on Internet use of studying and EQP1.
Behavsci 14 00866 g003
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables (N = 3162).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables (N = 3162).
VariablesMean or %Std. Dev.Min.Max.
Happiness3.3540.64914
Internet use
 (a)
Browsing news
4.4671.77316
 (b)
Playing
4.9161.59116
 (c)
Chatting
4.8511.66716
 (d)
Business
2.4942.12816
 (e)
Study
3.1392.04516
EQP
 EQP13.8260.88815
 EQP27.4271.976110
Sense of environmental security3.0740.59814
Age41.40713.7051870
Age square1902.3111164.3323244900
Gender0.4440.49701
SES3.6680.89415
Satisfaction with social welfare services7.2652.162110
Note: All of the variables appear in the final model.
Table 2. Correlation matrix for variables in the model.
Table 2. Correlation matrix for variables in the model.
Variable1234567891011121314
1. Age—
2. Age square0.987 ***—
3. Gender0.062 ***0.069 ***—
4. SES−0.027−0.033 *0.046 ***—
5. Satisfaction with social welfare services−0.039 **−0.0270.007−0.185 ***—
6. Browsing news−0.014−0.0110.219 ***−0.108 ***0.096 ***—
7. Playing−0.249 ***−0.240 ***−0.071 ***−0.045 **0.0160.124 ***—
8. Chatting−0.306 ***−0.299 ***−0.088 ***−0.054 ***0.0270.095 ***0.234 ***—
9. Business−0.262 ***−0.279 ***0.079 ***−0.073 ***0.0260.181 ***0.101 ***0.165 ***—
10. Study−0.357 ***−0.347 ***−0.023−0.106 ***0.093 ***0.319 ***0.121 ***0.198 ***0.379 ***—
11. EQP10.083 ***0.092 ***0.037 **−0.042 **0.291 ***0.021−0.064 ***−0.006−0.046 ***−0.038 **—
12. EQP20.0220.020−0.005−0.147 ***0.405 ***0.058 ***−0.0220.010−0.0220.058 ***0.305 ***—
13. Sense of environmental security0.056 ***0.059 ***0.019−0.086 ***0.255 ***−0.016−0.055 ***−0.006−0.041 **−0.0160.339 ***0.387 ***—
14. Happiness0.063 ***0.070 ***−0.049 ***−0.227 ***0.283 ***0.064 ***0.0140.022−0.0040.061 ***0.151 ***0.207 ***0.185 ***—
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Multivariate linear regression models predicting happiness.
Table 3. Multivariate linear regression models predicting happiness.
Models 1
Happiness		Models 2
Happiness		Models 3
Happiness		Models 4
Happiness		Model 5
Happiness
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)
Internet use
Browsing news0.015 *0.014 *
(0.006)(0.006)
Playing 0.0090.009
(0.007)(0.007)
Chatting 0.0090.009
(0.007)(0.007)
Business 0.0020.003
(0.005)(0.005)
Study 0.017 **0.016 **
(0.006)(0.006)
EQP
EQP10.031 * 0.032 * 0.031 * 0.032 * 0.033 *
(0.013) (0.013) (0.013) (0.013) (0.013)
EQP2 0.021 ** 0.021 *** 0.021 *** 0.021 *** 0.020 **
(0.006) (0.006) (0.006) (0.006) (0.006)
Sense of environmental security0.108 ***0.101 ***0.107 ***0.099 ***0.106 ***0.098 ***0.106 ***0.098 ***0.107 ***0.100 ***
(0.019)(0.020)(0.019)(0.020)(0.019)(0.020)(0.019)(0.020)(0.019)(0.020)
Age−0.005−0.006−0.004−0.005−0.004−0.005−0.005−0.006−0.003−0.005
(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)(0.005)
Age square0.0000.000+0.0000.000+0.000+0.000+0.0000.000+0.0000.000+
(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)
Gender−0.079 ***−0.076 ***−0.065 **−0.063 **−0.065 **−0.063 **−0.068 **−0.066 **−0.067 **−0.065 **
(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)
SES−0.122 ***−0.119 ***−0.124 ***−0.121 ***−0.124 ***−0.121 ***−0.125 ***−0.121 ***−0.121 ***−0.118 ***
(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)(0.012)
Satisfaction with social welfare services0.063 ***0.060 ***0.064 ***0.061 ***0.064 ***0.061 ***0.064 ***0.061 ***0.063 ***0.060 ***
(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)
cons2.879 ***2.902 ***2.880 ***2.903 ***2.886 ***2.903 ***2.944 ***2.962 ***2.838 ***2.868 ***
(0.134)(0.132)(0.141)(0.139)(0.139)(0.137)(0.131)(0.129)(0.136)(0.134)
N3162316231623162316231623162316231623162
R20.1330.1350.1320.1340.1320.1340.1320.1340.1340.136
Notes: For each of the variables, standard errors are in parentheses. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 4. Test of the mediating effect.
Table 4. Test of the mediating effect.
Panel A: Testing the Mediating Effects of EQP 1
VariablesOutcome: EQPOutcome: HappinessOutcome: HappinessOutcome: Happiness
(1)(2)(3)(4)
betatpbetatpbetatpbetatp
Study−0.016−2.010.045 0.0162.790.0050.0172.950.003
EQP1 0.0523.60.000 0.0533.690.000
Age−0.012−1.850.064−0.004−0.850.396−0.003−0.710.477−0.003−0.570.566
Age square0.0002.650.0080.0001.490.1350.0001.60.110.0001.400.16
Gender0.0481.560.118−0.066−3.000.003−0.064−2.890.004−0.066−3.010.003
SES0.0110.640.522−0.128−9.850.000−0.124−9.40.000−0.124−9.50.000
Satisfaction with social welfare services0.12215.700.07010.730.0000.07512.350.0000.06810.560.000
R20.098 ***0.124 ***0.121 ***0.126 ***
F49.1962.1758.1854.87
Panel B: Testing the Mediating Effects of EQP2
VariablesOutcome: EQP 2Outcome: HappinessOutcome: HappinessOutcome: Happiness
(1)(2)(3)(4)
betatpbetatpbetatpbetatp
Study0.0311.880.06 0.0162.790.0050.0152.630.009
EQP 2 0.0314.520.000 0.0304.440.000
Age0.0473.290.001−0.006−1.250.21−0.003−0.710.477−0.005−1.010.314
Age square0.000−2.770.0060.0001.930.0540.0001.60.110.0001.850.064
Gender−0.019−0.280.777−0.063−2.870.004−0.064−2.890.004−0.063−2.880.004
SES−0.157−4.000.000−0.122−9.370.000−0.124−9.40.000−0.120−9.070.000
Satisfaction with social welfare services0.36118.40.0000.0649.710.0000.07512.350.0000.0649.630.000
R20.174 ***0.127 ***0.121 ***0.129 ***
F69.662.0958.1854.57
Panel C: Testing the Mediating Effects of EQP 1 and EQP 2 (bootstrap = 5000)
MediatorIndependent VariableConditional Indirect EffectBoot SE95% CI (Bias-Corrected and Accelerated)
EQP 1Study−0.00090.00049[−0.0020729, −0.0000925]
EQP 2Study0.00090.0055[0.0000344, 0.002255]
Note: *** p < 0.001.
Table 5. Regression analysis results of the sense of environmental security moderate the mediation process.
Table 5. Regression analysis results of the sense of environmental security moderate the mediation process.
Step 1 (Outcome: EQP 1)Step 2 (Outcome: Happiness)
Predictorbetatpbetatp
Study−0.100−2.670.0080.0172.910.004
Sense of environmental security0.3307.620.000
Study × Sense of environmental security0.0282.360.018
EQP 1 0.0534.160.000
Age−0.013−1.960.050−0.003−0.550.583
Age square0.0002.620.0090.0001.350.176
Gender0.0401.370.171−0.066−3.020.003
SES0.0231.420.157−0.124−10.040.000
Satisfaction with social welfare services0.09313.250.0000.06812.750.000
R20.17100.1261
F81.32 ***65.04 ***
Note: *** p < 0.001.
Table 6. The mediation effect of EQP 1 (bootstrap = 5000).
Table 6. The mediation effect of EQP 1 (bootstrap = 5000).
EQP1Conditional Indirect EffectSE95% CI (Bias-Corrected and Accelerated)
M − SD0.7400.264[0.213, 1.224]
M0.8670.307[0.240, 1.403]
M + SD0.9940.351[0.264, 1.584]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, X.; Fu, M. Influence of Internet Use on Happiness in China: Mediating Effects of Environmental Quality Perception and Moderating Role of Sense of Environmental Security. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100866

AMA Style

Huang X, Fu M. Influence of Internet Use on Happiness in China: Mediating Effects of Environmental Quality Perception and Moderating Role of Sense of Environmental Security. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(10):866. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Xiaorui, and Mingqi Fu. 2024. "Influence of Internet Use on Happiness in China: Mediating Effects of Environmental Quality Perception and Moderating Role of Sense of Environmental Security" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 10: 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop