Comparative Analysis of Stroke, Marital Intimacy, Marital Satisfaction and Divorce Intention According to the Type of Participation in Marital Leisure Sports Activities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Literature Review
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants and Data Collection
2.2. Instruments
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Validity and Reliability
3.2. Multivariate Analysis of Variance for the Comparative Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wilcox, W.B.; Wolfinger, N.H. Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Soc. Sci. Res. 2007, 36, 569–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coontz, S. The origins of modern divorce. Fam. Process. 2007, 46, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghuman, S.J.; Lee, H.J.; Smith, H.L. Measurement of women’s autonomy according to women and their husbands: Results from five Asian countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 2006, 35, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, J.A.; Gerson, K. Overworked individuals or overworked families? Work Occup. 2001, 28, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoen, R.; Astone, N.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Rothert, K.; Standish, N.J. Women’s employment, marital happiness, and divorce. Soc. Forces. 2002, 81, 643–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, P.N. The coming divorce decline. Socius 2019, 5, 2378023119873497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balestrino, A.; Ciardi, C.; Mammini, C. On the causes and consequences of divorce. J. Socio Econ. 2013, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrere, S.; Gottman, J.M. Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Fam. Process. 1999, 38, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levinger, G. Sources of marital dissatisfaction among applicants for divorce. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1966, 36, 803–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, M.S. Marital stability and spouses’ shared time: A multidisciplinary hypothesis. J. Fam. Issues 1988, 9, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hickman-Evans, C.; Higgins, J.P.; Aller, T.B.; Chavez, J.; Piercy, K.W. Newlywed couple leisure: Couple identity formation through leisure time. Marriage Fam. Rev. 2018, 54, 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akgul, M.B.; Ertuzun, E. Leisure attitude, perceived freedom in leisure within married couples. J. Phys. Educ. Sport Manag. 2015, 6, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, H.A.; Zabriskie, R.B.; Hill, B. The contribution of couple leisure involvement, leisure time, and leisure satisfaction to marital satisfaction. Marriage Fam. Rev. 2006, 40, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalmijn, M.; Bernasco, W. Joint and separated lifestyles in couple relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 2001, 63, 639–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gsellmeier, K.; Cochran, L.J.; Dauenhauer, J. The impact of marital status and gender on leisure values of older adults. Act. Adapt. Aging 2015, 39, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, K.D.; Dattilo, J.; Taff, B.D.; Moeller, J. Leisure experiences of military couples postdeployment. Fam. Relat. 2018, 67, 630–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baxter, L.A.; West, L. Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: A dialectical perspective. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2003, 20, 491–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claxton, A.; Perry-Jenkins, M. No fun anymore: Leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. J. Marriage Fam. 2008, 70, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berne, E. Transactional analysis: A new and effective method of group therapy. Am. J. Psychother. 1958, 12, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eskedal, G.A. Transactional analysis. J. Educ. 1971, 153, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vos, J.; van Rijn, B. The evidence-based conceptual model of transactional analysis: A focused review of the research literature. Trans. Anal. J. 2021, 51, 160–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massey, R.F. Transactional analysis as a social psychology. Trans. Anal. J. 1996, 26, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, M.; Hezardastan, F.; Ahmadi, A.; Bahrami, F.; Etemadi, O.; Fatehizadeh, M. The effect of training through transactional analysis approach on couples’ communication patterns. World Appl. Sci. J. 2011, 12, 1337–1341. [Google Scholar]
- Yahyaee, G.A.; Nooranipoor, R.; Shafiabadi, A.; Farzad, V. The effectiveness of transactional analysis group-counseling on the improvement of couples’ family functioning. Arch. Hyg. Sci. 2015, 4, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
- Finn, S. Therapeutic assessment with couples. Prat. Psychol. 2015, 21, 345–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-S.; Lee, H.-S. Consensus qualitative research (CQR) for classification of couple stroke types. Korean J. Fam. Walf. 2020, 25, 415–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatelli, R.M.; Buck, R.; Dreyer, A. Nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples: Relationship with marital complaints. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1982, 43, 1088–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Buren, A. The relationship of verbal-nonverbal incongruence to communication mismatches in married couples. N. Am. J. Psychol. 2002, 4, 21–36. [Google Scholar]
- Cordova, J. Emotional skillfulness in marriage: Intimacy as a mediator of the relationship between emotional skillfulness and marital satisfaction. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 24, 218–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, K.M.; Speisman, J.C.; Jackson, D.; Bartis, S.; Costos, D. Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 50, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmerman, G.M. A concept analysis of intimacy. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 1991, 12, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirschberger, G.; Srivastava, S.; Marsh, P.; Cowan, C.P.; Cowan, P.A. Attachment, marital satisfaction, and divorce during the first fifteen years of parenthood. Personal Relat. 2009, 16, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, E.L.; Conley, J.J. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 52, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holman, T.B.; Jacquart, M. Leisure-activity patterns and marital satisfaction: A further test. J. Marriage Fam. 1988, 50, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiono, P.H.; Quinn, L.S. Epidemiology of divorce. Future Child. 1994, 4, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodenmann, G.; Charvoz, L.; Bradbury, T.N.; Bertoni, A.; Iafrate, R.; Giuliani, C.; Banse, R.; Behling, J. The role of stress in divorce: A three-nation retrospective study. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2007, 24, 707–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booth, A.; Amato, P. Divorce and psychological stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1991, 32, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Felix, D.S.; Robinson, W.D.; Jarzynka, K.J. The influence of divorce on men’s health. J. Mens Health 2013, 10, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwasaki, Y.; Schneider, I.E. Leisure, stress, and coping: An evolving area of inquiry. Leis. Sci. 2003, 25, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, L.; Brown, J.E. Weekend work and leisure time with family and friends: Who misses out? J. Marriage Fam. 2014, 76, 710–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, P.J.; Lundberg, N.R.; Zabriskie, R.B.; Berrett, K. Measuring marital satisfaction: A comparison of the revised dyadic adjustment scale and the satisfaction with married life scale. Marriage Fam. Rev. 2009, 45, 412–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crawford, D.W.; Houts, R.M.; Huston, T.L.; George, L.J. Compatibility, leisure, and satisfaction in marital relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 2002, 64, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- South, S.J.; Spitze, G. Determinants of divorce over the marital life course. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1986, 51, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emerson, J.; Bertoch, M.R.; Checketts, K.T. Transactional analysis ego state functioning, psychological distress, and client change. Psychotherapy 1994, 31, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lester, G.M. TA marital therapy. Trans. Anal. J. 1980, 10, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirai, S. How transactional analysis can be used in terminal care. Int. Congr. S. 2006, 1287, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrow, G. Transactional analysis, pastoral care and education. Pastoral Care Educ. 2007, 25, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, P. Transactional analysis theory: The basics. Trans. Anal. J. 2003, 33, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y.S.; Kim, J. The effectiveness of ego states and stroke on human relationship of college students based on theory of transactional analysis. Educ. Cult. 2020, 26, 265–286. [Google Scholar]
- Dixit, V.; Ramachandran, K. Transactional analysis: A marital therapy. Indian J. Health Wellbeing 2019, 10, 362–367. [Google Scholar]
- Sisson, P.J.; Arthur, G.L.; Carpenter, N. Transactional analysis and gestalt therapy used in conjunction with group counseling for married couples. Together 1977, 2, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordova, J.V.; Scott, R.L. Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation. Behav. Anal. 2001, 24, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Ari, A.; Lavee, Y. Dyadic closeness in marriage: From the inside story to a conceptual model. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2007, 24, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamieson, L. Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociol. J. Br. Sociol. Assoc. 1999, 33, 447–494. [Google Scholar]
- Greeff, A.P.; Malherbe, H.L. Intimacy and marital satisfaction in spouses. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2001, 27, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vannoy, D. Roles in the divorce process. J. Divorce Remarriage 2000, 32, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farbod, E.; Ghamari, M.; Majd, M.A. Investigating the effect of communication skills training for married women on couples’ intimacy and quality of life. SAGE Open. 2014, 4, 2158244014537085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roach, A.J.; Frazier, L.P.; Bowden, S.R. The marital satisfaction scale: Development of a measure for intervention research. J. Marriage Fam. 1981, 43, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandhya, S. The social context of marital happiness in urban Indian couples: Interplay of intimacy and conflict. J. Marital Fam. Ther. 2009, 35, 74–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, P.J.; Barney, K.W.; Lundberg, N.R.; Zabriskie, R.B. A critical examination of couple leisure and the application of the core and balance model. J. Leis. Res. 2014, 46, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H. Focusing on the theory of exchange-exchange analysis (TA) on the ego state and stroke of active duty volunteers. J. Couns. Stud. 2007, 8, 181–197. [Google Scholar]
- Sternberg, R.J. A triangular theory of love. Psychol. Rev. 1986, 93, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.H. The Effects of the Marital Relationship on the Marital Satisfaction and Divorce Intention of the Young-Old. Doctoral Dissertation, Hoseo University, Asan, Republic of Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E.S. Relationship among Depression, Marital Satisfaction, Family Health and Somatization. Master’s Thesis, Inje University, Gimhae, Republic of Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.S. The Effect of Attribution on Satisfaction and Divorce Intention in Marriage. Doctoral Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Cha, S.H. The Effects of Marital Conflict on Divorce Behavior in Old Age: Focusing on Social Resource Utilization and Problem-Solving Skills. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyonggi University, Kyonggi, Republic of Korea, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Netemeyer, R.G.; Bearden, W.O.; Sharma, S. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Demir, C.; Demir, N. Bireylerin boş zaman faaliyetlerine katilmalarini etkileyen faktörler ile cinsiyet arasindaki ilişki: Lisans öğrencilerine yönelik bir uygulama. Ege Acad. Rev. 2006, 6, 36–48. [Google Scholar]
- Zabriskie, R.B.; McCormick, B.P. The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Fam. Relat. 2001, 50, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gershuny, J. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Glorieux, I.; Minnen, J.; van Tienoven, T.P. Spouse ‘together time’: Quality time within the household. Soc. Indic. Res. 2011, 101, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orthner, D.K. Leisure activity patterns and marital satisfaction over the marital career. J. Marriage Fam. 1975, 37, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, J.H. Exchange Analysis (TA) Program, 4th ed.; Jeongam Seowon: Daegu, Republic of Korea, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Kincaid, S.B.; Caldwell, R.A. Marital separation: Causes, coping, and consequences. J. Divorce Remarriage 1995, 22, 109–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.I.; Choi, M.A.; Chae, Y.R. Prevalence and predictors of geriatric depression in community-dwelling elderly. Asian Nurs. Res. 2009, 3, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agate, J.R.; Zabriskie, R.B.; Agate, S.T.; Poff, R. Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. J. Leis. Res. 2009, 41, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fincham, F.D.; Beach, S.R.H.; Kemp-Fincham, S.I. Marital quality: A new theoretical perspective. In Satisfaction in Close Relationships; Sternberg, R.J., Hojjat, M., Eds.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 275–304. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, S.M. Diversity and ideology: Changes in Canadian family life and implications for leisure. World Leis. J. 2010, 52, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herridge, K.L.; Shaw, S.M.; Mannell, R.C. An exploration of women’s leisure within heterosexual romantic relationships. J. Leis. Res. 2003, 35, 274–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.M.; Dawson, D. Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leis. Sci. 2001, 23, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, G.T.; Snyder, D.K.; Trull, T.J.; Monsma, B.R. Predicting relationship satisfaction from couples’ use of leisure time. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 1988, 16, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orthner, D.K.; Mancini, J.A. Benefits of leisure for family bonding. In Benefits of Leisure; Venture Publishing: State College, PA, USA, 1991; pp. 289–301. [Google Scholar]
- Brîndescu, S. Beneficiile practicării activităţilor de timp liber. Rev. Marathon. 2010, 2, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Leonte, N. Bunăstarea fizică—Dimensiune a calităţii vieţii. Rev. Marathon. 2012, 4, 52. [Google Scholar]
- Memar Bahabadi, N.; Morsel, B.; Tayebisani, S.M.; Fahiminezhad, A. Relationship between family participation in sport/recreational activities and marital and life satisfaction. J. Res. Health 2020, 10, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgos-Garrido, E.; Gurpegui, M.; Jurado, D. Personality traits and adherence to physical activity in patients attending a primary health centre. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2011, 11, 539–547. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, B.; Ainbinder, A.M.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. Stress and working parents. In Work and Leisure; Haworth, J.T., Veal, A.J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2004; pp. 145–167. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.H. Research trends on divorce intentions: Focusing on domestic academic journals and dissertations. J. Couns. Educ. 2022, 5, 62–82. [Google Scholar]
- Meunier, V.; Baker, W. Positive Couple Relationships: The Evidence for Long-Lasting Relationship Satisfaction and Happiness. In Positive Relationships; Roffey, S., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 73–89. [Google Scholar]
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 34 (39.1%) | 49 (57.6%) | 39 (55.7%) | 36 (45.6%) |
Female | 53 (60.9%) | 36 (42.4%) | 31 (44.3%) | 43 (54.4%) | |
Age | 20s | 8 (9.2%) | 11 (12.9%) | 8 (11.4%) | 14 (17.7%) |
30s | 30 (34.5%) | 16 (18.8%) | 16 (22.9%) | 16 (20.3%) | |
40s | 16 (18.4%) | 13 (15.3%) | 22 (31.4%) | 23 (29.1%) | |
50s | 24 (27.6%) | 28 (32.9%) | 17 (24.3%) | 16 (20.3%) | |
Over 60s | 9 (10.3%) | 17 (20.0%) | 7 (10.0%) | 10 (12.7%) | |
Marriage duration | Less than 10 yrs | 42 (48.3%) | 32 (37.6%) | 29 (41.4%) | 40 (50.6%) |
Less than 20 yrs | 10 (11.5%) | 18 (21.2%) | 22 (31.4%) | 16 (20.3%) | |
Less than 30 yrs | 26 (29.9%) | 19 (22.4%) | 13 (18.6%) | 12 (15.2%) | |
Less than 40 yrs | 8 (9.2%) | 15 (17.6%) | 6 (8.6%) | 11 (13.9%) | |
Unknown | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.2%) | - | - | |
Family income | Single | 33 (37.9%) | 31 (36.5%) | 32 (45.7%) | 33 (41.8%) |
Dual | 50 (57.5%) | 50 (58.8%) | 37 (52.9%) | 43 (54.4%) | |
Unknown | 4 (4.6%) | 4 (4.7%) | 1 (1.4%) | 3 (3.8%) | |
Leisure activity duration | None | - | - | 8 (11.4%) | 63 (79.9%) |
Less than 1 yr | 14 (16.1%) | 23 (27.1%) | 22 (31.4%) | 11 (13.9%) | |
1–5 yrs | 33 (16.1%) | 32 (37.6%) | 9 (12.9%) | 3 (3.8%) | |
5–10 yrs | 11 (12.6%) | 6 (7.1%) | 14 (20.0%) | - | |
10–20 yrs | 21 (24.1%) | 17 (20.0%) | 9 (12.9%) | 2 (2.5%) | |
Over 20 yrs | 7 (8.0%) | 6 (7.1%) | 8 (11.4%) | - | |
Unknown | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.2%) | - | - | |
Frequency of leisure activity | None | - | - | 13 (18.6%) | 70 (88.6%) |
Once a month | 10 (11.5%) | 17 (20.0%) | 13 (18.6%) | 3 (3.8%) | |
2–3 times a month | 34 (39.1%) | 31 (36.5%) | 22 (31.4%) | 2 (2.5%) | |
Once a week | 16 (18.4%) | 20 (23.5%) | 9 (12.9%) | 1 (1.3%) | |
More than 2 a week | 22 (25.3%) | 15 (17.6%) | 7 (10.0%) | 3 (3.8%) | |
Almost everyday | 4 (4.6%) | 2 (2.4%) | 6 (8.6%) | - | |
Unknown | 1 (1.1%) | - | - | - | |
Total | 87 (100.0%) | 85 (100.0%) | 70 (100.0%) | 79 (100.0%) |
Items | A | B | C | D | E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I recently received a compliment from my spouse. | 0.880 | −0.219 | −0.178 | −0.058 | 0.282 |
My spouse compliments me a lot during our marriage. | 0.879 | −0.183 | −0.169 | −0.056 | 0.254 |
My spouse says “thank you” a lot. | 0.873 | −0.220 | −0.132 | −0.069 | 0.257 |
I have a spouse who supports me in difficult situations. | 0847 | −0.201 | −0.219 | −0.063 | 0.293 |
My spouse has a nervous reaction to my criticism. | −0.125 | 0.860 | 0.184 | 0.108 | −0.055 |
I am often criticized by my spouse for my mistakes. | −0.181 | 0.857 | 0.165 | 0.028 | −0.120 |
I have been blamed by my spouse for things that had nothing to do with me. | −0.199 | 0.849 | 0.118 | 0.077 | −0.183 |
I often feel that my spouse is strict. | −0.204 | 0.836 | 0.105 | 0.021 | −0.203 |
I don’t want to argue with my spouse, so I try to avoid it. | −0.159 | 0.195 | 0.88 | 0.094 | −0.057 |
I don’t mind canceling plans with my spouse. | −0.130 | 0.067 | 0.874 | 0.109 | −0.129 |
I feel liberated when I eat alone without my spouse. | −0.181 | 0.170 | 0.855 | 0.063 | −0.111 |
I can’t concentrate on a conversation with my spouse. | −0.114 | 0.139 | 0.824 | 0.180 | −0.102 |
I express my unpleasant feelings to my spouse honestly. | −0.024 | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.895 | −0.076 |
I tend to be honest about my spouse’s faults. | −0.016 | 0.062 | 0.092 | 0.888 | −0.128 |
I tend to criticize my spouse for misbehavior. | −0.028 | 0.066 | 0.145 | 0.858 | −0.069 |
I get irritated with my spouse when something bad happens. | −0.150 | 0.095 | 0.154 | 0.816 | −0.193 |
I actively help my spouse in times of need. | 0.266 | −0.165 | −0.087 | −0.137 | 0.843 |
I always remember and celebrate my spouse’s anniversaries. | 0.254 | −0.176 | −0.099 | −0.207 | 0.824 |
I show appreciation for my spouse’s hard work. | 0.247 | −0.214 | −0.194 | −0.121 | 0.777 |
I am more active when spending leisure time with my spouse. | 0.170 | −0.066 | −0.074 | 0.081 | 0.747 |
Eigenvalues | 8.055 | 2.841 | 2.303 | 1.907 | 1.213 |
Variance (%) | 40.274 | 14.206 | 11.513 | 9.534 | 6.063 |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.966 | 0.916 | 0.917 | 0.905 | 0.896 |
Variables | Sub-Factors | df | F | p | η2 | Post-Hoc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | 1. Positive strokes I give to my spouse | 3 | 43.074 | <0.001 *** | 0.290 | a,b > c,d |
2. Positive strokes I receive from my spouse | 3 | 42.049 | <0.001 *** | 0.285 | a > b,c,d | |
3. Negative strokes I give to my spouse | 3 | 9.741 | <0.001 *** | 0.084 | a,b,c < d | |
4. Negative strokes I receive from my spouse | 3 | 23.725 | <0.001 *** | 0.183 | a < b,c,d | |
5. No stroke | 3 | 15.064 | <0.001 *** | 0.125 | a < b,c,d | |
Marital intimacy | 3 | 42.868 | <0.001 *** | 0.289 | a > b,c,d | |
Marital satisfaction | 3 | 48.567 | <0.001 *** | 0.315 | a > b,c,d | |
Divorce intention | 3 | 34.674 | <0.001 *** | 0.247 | a < b,c < d |
Stroke | Marital Intimacy | Marital Satisfaction | Divorce Intention | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
Group 1 | G2 | 0.003 ** | <0.001 *** | 0.577 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** |
G3 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | 0.169 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | |
G4 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | |
Group 2 | G1 | 0.003 ** | <0.001 *** | 0.577 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** |
G3 | <0.001*** | 0.010 * | 0.843 | 0.118 | 0.886 | 0.750 | 0.936 | 0.154 | |
G4 | <0.001 *** | 0.028 * | 0.002 ** | 0.027 * | 0.986 | 0.412 | 0.05 | <0.001 *** | |
Group 3 | G1 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | 0.169 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** |
G2 | <0.001 *** | 0.010 * | 0.843 | 0.118 | 0.886 | 0.75 | 0.936 | 0.154 | |
G4 | 0.098 | 0.979 | 0.056 | 0.966 | 0.981 | 0.963 | 0.013 * | 0.012 * | |
Group 4 | G1 | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** |
G2 | <0.001 *** | 0.028 * | 0.002 ** | 0.027 * | 0.986 | 0.412 | 0.05 | <0.001 *** | |
G3 | 0.098 | 0.979 | 0.056 | 0.966 | 0.981 | 0.963 | 0.013 * | 0.012 * |
Stroke | Marital Intimacy | Marital Satisfaction | Divorce Intention | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
Group 1 | 4.0057 | 4.1121 | 2.4741 | 1.9770 | 1.8420 | 4.2368 | 4.0529 | 1.5996 |
Group 2 | 3.5088 | 3.0794 | 2.6676 | 2.5676 | 2.5471 | 2.9694 | 2.8047 | 2.2000 |
Group 3 | 2.9357 | 2.5179 | 2.8000 | 2.9000 | 2.6643 | 2.7914 | 2.9029 | 2.5571 |
Group 4 | 2.5759 | 2.5918 | 3.2089 | 2.9715 | 2.6013 | 2.7038 | 2.3924 | 3.0823 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, J.-H.; Yang, H.J.; Jung, S.C.; Choi, C.; Bum, C.-H. Comparative Analysis of Stroke, Marital Intimacy, Marital Satisfaction and Divorce Intention According to the Type of Participation in Marital Leisure Sports Activities. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090757
Yang J-H, Yang HJ, Jung SC, Choi C, Bum C-H. Comparative Analysis of Stroke, Marital Intimacy, Marital Satisfaction and Divorce Intention According to the Type of Participation in Marital Leisure Sports Activities. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(9):757. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090757
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Ji-Hye, Hye Jin Yang, Si Cheol Jung, Chulhwan Choi, and Chul-Ho Bum. 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Stroke, Marital Intimacy, Marital Satisfaction and Divorce Intention According to the Type of Participation in Marital Leisure Sports Activities" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 9: 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090757