Next Article in Journal
Development of a Control Algorithm for a Semi-Active Mid-Story Isolation System Using Reinforcement Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Technological Parameters on the Size of Benzocaine Particles in Ointments Formulated on Selected Bases
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Polarization Imaging Method for Underwater Low-Visibility Metal Target Using Focus Dividing Plane

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(4), 2054; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042054
by Haopeng Xue 1,2, Ronghua Li 1,2,*, Yongfeng Zhao 1 and Yuan Deng 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(4), 2054; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042054
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 4 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Optics and Lasers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear professor:

Thank you for your comments. Those comments are valuable and very helpful. We have read through comments carefully and have made corrections. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we uploaded the file of the revised manuscript. Revisions in the text are shown using yellow highlight for additions. The responses to the reviewer's comments are In the attached file.
We would love to thank you for allowing us to resubmit a revised copy of the manuscript and we highly appreciate your time and consideration.

Sincerely.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper proposes a metal target detection method based on split focus plane polarization imaging. The research design should be improved.

1. The authors should give further study of the parameter $\beta$ in subsection 2.2. How does $\beta$ affect the detection performance?

2. In Figure 9, which is the image of I and which is DOP?

3. The authors design the polarization imaging experiment of metal target in low visibility underwater in subsection 4.3 and obtained the image I and DOP. However, the comparisons are not complete. The authors should compare with more canonical methods.

Author Response

Dear professor:

Thank you for your comments. Those comments are valuable and very helpful. We have read through comments carefully and have made corrections. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we uploaded the file of the revised manuscript. Revisions in the text are shown using yellow highlight for additions. The responses to the reviewer's comments are In the attached file.
We would love to thank you for allowing us to resubmit a revised copy of the manuscript and we highly appreciate your time and consideration.

Sincerely.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The author has revised previous comments. I recommend the manuscript for publication in Applied Sciences.

Back to TopTop