Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Maritime Transportation: A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Risk Management Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Host Species and Optimized Cultivation Practices for Enhanced Bioactive Compound Production in Cordyceps militaris
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Mould Growth in Pine and Spruce Sapwood and Heartwood under Fluctuating Humidity

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Architectural Engineering, Thákurova 7/2077, 166 29 Prague 6, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(18), 8417; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188417
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 11 September 2024 / Published: 19 September 2024

Abstract

:
The importance of maintaining a healthy indoor climate has recently increased, as has the durability of building structures, and for this issue, we need to predict mould growth. To prepare this model under real conditions is challenging, and this work aimed to contribute data to this model. This article presents the findings of a laboratory study investigating the effects of fluctuations in the relative humidity and temperature conditions on mould growth on pine and spruce. The study compared the results to a previous steady-state experiment, demonstrating that fluctuations in relative humidity and temperature prolonged the onset of mould growth. The mould growth observed depended on the type of wood with pine or spruce wood exhibiting different growth patterns compared to heartwood or sapwood. In sapwood, mould growth was found to be almost independent of the direction of the fiber. The first microscopic indications of mould growth on pine sapwood were observed around day 76, with the first macroscopic indications observed around day 90. On the contrary, spruce sapwood demonstrated a limit for mould growth. The mould growth was only visible under the microscope with the first indications observed between the 72nd and 80th day. Furthermore, heartwood was found to be unsuitable for mould growth under fluctuating conditions.

1. Introduction

Mould is a small organism that occurs on many types of surfaces and is widely disseminated through spores. The mould is important in the biochemical cycle of elements, the movement and transformation of chemical elements, and compounds between living organisms, and it enables the decomposition of materials and therefore is necessary in life. For humans, they can cause several health problems, especially immunodeficiency ones [1,2,3,4,5]. The most dangerous mould for human health is species such as Aspergillus spp. or Stachybotris spp. [6]. In buildings, they can lead to the deterioration of interior and exterior finishes as well as other structural components. This deterioration can have adverse effects on both the physical condition of the building and human health, resulting in economic and social costs. Additionally, the presence of mould is indicative of high humidity, which can accelerate the degradation of structures and lead to an uncomfortably humid environment for occupants.
Because of the above, knowledge of the probability of occurrence of mould in a building is very important. The mould requires for its life available nutrients and humidity as well as a sufficient pH [7,8]. The amount of humidity required for the germination and subsequent development of mycelium and the dissemination of mould vary depending on the species [9]. The amount of humidity on finishing materials is dependent on the ratio of environmental humidity and temperature. Generally, the building materials in conditions below 80% relative humidity (RH) do not support mould growth [10].
In order to assess the parameters that contribute to mould growth on wood, it is necessary to consider the effect of temperature and RH. To accurately simulate the conditions that occur in real building conditions where mould growth occurs, it is necessary to employ a dynamic prediction model of mould growth that includes changing conditions over time. Furthermore, it is crucial to consider the specific species of wood, the portion of the tree from which the samples were obtained, and the direction of the cut [11,12,13,14]. Furthermore, the species of wood, the part of the tree, and the method of cutting the sample are important information [15,16].
The more important factor for mould germination is the moisture of the substrate rather than the environment RH [17]. In general, a higher humidity is required for germination and then for subsequent growth [18]. The minimum humidity requirements to growth are dependent on the species, which are divided into three groups. Hydrophilic fungi require relative humidity above 90%, moderately xerophilic fungi begin to grow at RH 75–79% and slightly xerophilic fungi need RH in the range of 80–89% [19,20,21]. For example, Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp. and Alternaria spp. begin germination around 85% RH [22,23,24,25]. These moisture ranges for mould growth were calculated from the experiments based on laboratory experiments on nutrient agar, where the nutrient condition is optimal [25,26,27]. For building materials, where nutrient availability is not optimal but rather limited, the requirement for available moisture is probably slightly higher than mentioned above [28,29]. Moisture requirements are also related to temperature; at lower temperatures, the mould requires more available humidity to germinate and grow [14,30]. The growth of mould is also dependent on temperature even when other conditions remain constant [14,31]. A reduction in temperature from 20 to 5 °C has been observed to result in a fourfold reduction in the rate of mould growth. According to Ref. [14], the other requirements for mould grow are nutrients such as sources of carbon, nitrogen, etc. Especially when glucose is available as a carbon source, germination is faster [32].
The majority of published results pertaining to mould growth are focused on pine wood [11,15,33,34]. Under constant conditions (approximately 90% relative humidity and 22 °C, on pine sapwood), initial mould growth is observed around day 7, while macroscopic mould growth is visible between days 10 and 22, which depends on surface preparation [8,33]. The length of time required for germination is influenced by environmental conditions and the duration of unfavorable conditions. In cases where the temperature and RH fluctuate, prolonging the duration of unfavorable conditions has been associated with an increase in the time required for germination to occur. A weekly RH cycle (90/60% RH, 22 °C) is only suitable for the germination and formation of a limited number of hyphae. A 12 h cycle of fluctuating relative humidity (90/60% RH, 22 °C) ultimately results in a change in germination time over a six-week period. Following germination, however, the fungal growth curve remained identical to that observed under constant conditions. A weekly temperature cycle (90% RH, 5/22 °C) resulted in a prolongation of the germination period (approximately 49 days) and a slowing down of fungal regrowth [31].
This article examines the impact of fluctuating conditions on the growth of mould on wood. The conditions under which mould growth is most likely to occur were selected for examination rather than those that are commonly found in buildings or structures. In alignment with the findings of the literature review, this study assesses mould growth from a multifaceted perspective, extending beyond the conventional parameters of temperature and humidity fluctuations. It considers the influence of wood species and wood type (pine and spruce, heartwood and sapwood) as well as the direction of the cut used to obtain samples (tangential, radial, and transverse). The samples with different wood fiber directions were chosen to see if, even under fluctuation conditions, mould growth would be different for each direction.

2. Materials and Methods

This paper presents the results of a laboratory experiment on pine and spruce samples from sapwood and heartwood, which were prepared using a single beam with respect to fiber directions. The samples were exposed to fluctuating humidity and temperature in 18/6 h cycles. The temperature varied between 25 and 15 °C, while the humidity varied between 98% and 73% with the higher condition present for 18 h. The experimental condition was monitored by the data logger. Mould growth was observed weekly using a 40× and 100× magnification microscope and the naked eye (1×).
Additionally, the live phase of the mould was also recorded, including germination, hyphae, sporulation, and decay. The more important stage was recorded by images. This research is notable for its use of samples with respect to the direction of wood fibers. The assessment of mould growth was conducted based on evaluations of mould coverage of samples and the life phase of mould.
The primary findings are presented in the form of a time-dependent mould index. The mould index is a dimensionless quantity used to model mould growth. For a detailed description of this index, please refer to the section on Evaluation, specifically Section 2.3. The characteristics of specific MI and typical figures are presented for enhanced comprehension; see tables in Section 2.3 and figures in Section 3.
The experiment was conducted in several steps; see Figure 1. The initial step of the experiment, see Section 2.1 (Preparation), involved sample preparation, which included their sterilization and humidity conditioning. Additionally, a spore suspension was prepared for inoculation. The second stage, see Section 2.2 (Main experiment), involved conducting the experiment within the experimental chamber described in [35]. The condition is described in Section 2.2. The last step, see Section 2.3, was the assessment of mould growth, which was based on the intermediate evaluations of the individual samples, notes, and photographic records.

2.1. Preparation

2.1.1. Materials and Samples

The wood samples were prepared from spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The origin boards for preparing samples were 4 m long boards, which were obtained from a commercial lumberyard in 2017. The boards were free of any defects, including warping, blue stain mould, knots, or resin in pockets. The wood was dried at a temperature below 60 °C. The dry bulk density was 387–454 kg/m3 for spruce and 478–565 kg/m3 for pine. The variation in dry bulk density for the wood samples is expected to be lower due to the similar position on the trunk. The boards were stored under controlled environmental conditions (temperature 20–25 °C, relative humidity 50–60%) before preparing the samples.
The samples were prepared from sapwood and heartwood portions and oriented according to the anatomical direction of wood fibers. Samples were prepared in 12 modifications, regarding anatomical species and fiber direction; see Table 1 and illustrative images in Figure 2. A particular type of samples was prepared in six repetitions.
The dimensions of the samples were 20 mm × 20 mm × 3 mm. Inoculation and mould growth observations were conducted on the main top surface of each specimen, specifically the 20 mm × 20 mm square.
The surface of the samples was treated with a planer (Makita 2012NB) in order to achieve uniform surface quality with the exception of the transverse surface. The tangential surfaces of the specimens were composed exclusively of early wood. The samples were subjected to UV radiation for a period of 30 min on each side in order to be sterilized. Prior to the commencement of the main experiment, the samples were conditioned to achieve an equilibrium moisture content with an RH of 86% at 22 °C of the environmental conditions; see the Figure 3. The mentioned RH was established using saturated salt solutions (Na2SO4 × 10 H2O). This preconditioning was conducted for a period of seven days.

2.1.2. Preparation of the Inoculate

The experimental inoculum was prepared from mould species commonly found in the Czech Republic and known to occur in the wood built into the construction [12,36,37]. The selected species were obtained from the Czech Collection of Microorganisms at the Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Aspergillus niger van Tieghem (CCM 8189), Penicillium cf. brevicompactum Dierckx (CCM 8288) and Alternaria alternata (Fries) von Keissler (CCM F-397); their accession numbers of species are in the brackets.
Before inoculation, the moulds were reinoculated and the spores were collected as described in [1]. Each spore suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL (colony formation units per milliliter), and the experimental spore suspension was prepared in a 1:1:0.25 ratio of 1:1:0.25 with the lowest level of Aspergillus sp. present.

2.2. Main Experiment

The samples were placed in an aluminum tray to facilitate handling during microscope evaluation and to limit the effect of moisture and heat to only one side of the samples (1D transport), as illustrated in Figure 4. Bitumen sealant was applied to the sides of the samples to prevent heat and moisture transport through other locations. This methodology for sample deposition was employed due to the continuity of these experiments with those where dynamic moisture transport was measured [35].
Each tray always contained samples from one species of wood and samples with all directions (T, R, X). A total of six trays were prepared for each kind of wood; see Table 1. The trays were placed in the special box in rows from the top: pine sapwood, pine heartwood, spruce sapwood, and spruce heartwood. The special box (see Figure 5) was used to create an environment with the desired relative humidity, as described in detail in Richter et al. (2023) [35]. Fans and settling chambers were used to maintain a constant laminar flow of treated air over the samples. The velocity of the airflow was measured at a height of 1.0 cm above the exposed surface of the sample and was found to be 0.3 m/s. The temperature and RH were monitored using COMET dataloggers, which exhibited an accuracy of ±0.3 °C and ±2.5% RH, respectively.
The experimental conditions were set up as follows: 98% RH at 25 °C for 16 h and 73% RH at 15 °C for 8 h; see Figure 3. To maintain lower relative humidity, a saturated sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was employed, while distilled water was utilized to maintain higher relative humidity. The main experiment was conducted over a period of five months; the conditions are shown in the graph in Figure 3.

2.3. Evaluation and Base of Assessments

Mould growth was observed using microscopic (BA 410E Epi microscope, Motic, Barcelona, Spain) and macroscopic methods. Microscopic images were taken with a Promicam Pro 3-3CP camera attached to the microscope, and macroscopic images were taken by a photographic camera. The observation had 40–100× magnification. Observations were made every three days at the beginning of the experiment. During the middle phase of the experiment, the interval was extended to seven days, and at the end of the experiment, it was extended to 14 days.
The experiment was carried out over five months. Both quantitative and qualitative indicators describing mould growth were recorded and used to determine the mould index (MI); see Table 2 and Table 3.
The scale of the MI was developed based on the work of Johansson [3] and subsequently augmented by the addition of the mould subindex (MSI), which provides a more accurate description. The MI and MIS are determined by the extent of visible coverage under 40× and 1× magnification as well as the phase of mould growth.
The microscopic coverage of the surface was estimated through microscopic observations at 40× magnification, while the phase of mould growth was determined through observations at 100× magnification. Both approaches were utilized to ascertain the MI, or if it was possible, the MIS was determined. Macroscopic coverage, beginning at MI = 3, was gauged using photographic documentation at 40× and 1× magnifications. Additionally, the presence and condition (visibility) of hyphae and sporangia were documented.
The decision between MI 1 and 1.5 or between 3 and 3.5 is based on the rate of coverage. In general, MI Mould index 0 indicates no growth or germination, while MI 0.5 (germination) was not observed on wood samples. The MI 2 indicates microscopic visible mould growth, whilst the MI 3 indicates macroscopic visible mould growth. Indexes 3 and 4 include macroscopic mould growth.

3. Results

Mould growth had evaluated as a time-dependent MI. The attainment of a specific MI at a given time was initially evaluated separately for all samples and subsequently subdivided into sample types and an additional subgroup (see PSRA). Subsequently, for each group, the date of attainment of a given MI was calculated as the average of all samples in that group, which was rounded to the nearest day. The samples were divided into three main groups. The first group consisted of heartwood samples regardless of tree species. The second group consisted of pine sapwood samples, and the third group included spruce sapwood.

3.1. Pine and Spruce Heartwood

The results showed that the heartwood is similar to other woods and the direction of the grain at the top site does not affect mould growth.
A total of 36 heartwood samples were analyzed without regard for the botanical species or the way the samples were cut. In most cases, mould growth was not observed on the heartwood samples. The mould growth observed on spruce heartwood samples was limited to two samples with the maximum MI reaching 1.

3.2. Pine—Sapwood

Mould growth was observed in all samples made of pine sapwood. When mould growth was evaluated in terms of wood fiber direction, a single group of three samples exhibited significantly different mould growth and was designated as PSRa with the index “a” added to the designation.
The initial manifestation of growth in PSRa was observed on the 27th day, yet in general, the growth rate was notably slower than that observed in other samples from pine sapwood. Upon completion of the experiment, the mould coverage reached a maximum of MI = 4.
The maximum value of mould growth for the remaining samples was recorded as MI = 3.5. The value of MI = 3 was recorded on the days indicated in parentheses. The specific days on which this value was recorded are as follows: PSX (101), PSR (110) and PST (120). The highest mould index (MI) of 4 was observed exclusively in the PSX samples. For further details regarding the relevant dates, please refer to Table 4. Illustrative images can be found in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8.

3.3. Spruce—Sapwood

Mould was observed only in the SST and SSR samples of the spruce sapwood samples, as shown in Table 5 and Figure 9. It is worth noting that the growth was only observed microscopically. The growth was slower in the SR samples. No growth was observed in the SX direction samples until the end of the experiment.

4. Discussion

This study confirms that mould growth on the surface of heartwood has occurred in a negligible number of instances under fluctuating conditions (98/75% RH, 25/15 °C in cycles of 16/8 h). The frequency of mould growth on heartwood was found to be only on 2 samples out of 36 regardless of the wood species from which the samples were derived, whether pine or spruce. These results are probably because of the low amount of nutrient for mould growth in the heartwood part of the tree [11,19,21,38], which consists of mainly saccharides and is a source of basic elements such as nitrogen and phosphorous.
The mould growth on pine sapwood showed that the samples had different properties, because the mould growed on the four samples differently than it did on the 12 other samples. The three samples were PST and one PSX, which were more problematic samples for preparation with respect both to the direction of the fibers and the differentiation of sapwood and heartwood. The groups are labeled as PSRa and showed similar curve as [15] for pine sapwood at a constant RH and fluctuation temperature (RH 90%, 22 °C/5 °C in weekly cycles). The difference was that the maximal MI was 4. The mould growth curve under fluctuation conditions (RH 97% at 25 °C for 16 h/ RH 73% at 15 °C for 8 h) for other pine sapwood samples (PST, PSX, PSR) have shifted over the 50 days for the germination (MI = 1) compared to the samples PSRa. Generally, pine sapwood samples have a shift in germination and regrow a little slower than the same samples made from the same trunk and placed in constant conditions (RH 95% at 22 °C, RH 87% at 22 °C) [8].
Given the above, it seems that the mould growth under fluctuating conditions depends on the duration of uncomfortable conditions for growth and how far the conditions are from optimal. When the conditions are not far from optimal, the rate of growth depends on the availability of nutrients. Mould growth is more affected by uncomfortable RH than by uncomfortable temperature. The temperature around 15 °C and 73% RH for 8 h (uncomfortable condition) makes germination slower by seven weeks but does not affect the rate of regrowth.
The spruce sapwood showed more effects from fluctuating conditions compared to samples made from the same trunk at constant conditions (87% RH and 95% RH at 23 °C). For pine sapwood, the direction of fibers did not show any difference. The germination had a shift around 3 months, and the maximal MI was 2. It confirms that nutrients composed of spruce are not suitable for mould growth under fluctuating conditions, and the composition of wood is an important feature for the rate of mould growth.
The hypothesis that different growth rates would be observed under fluctuating conditions depending on the direction of wood fiber was not substantiated by the findings. It is probable that this was due to the small height of the samples and the fact that they were sealed on all sides except the top. It can be assumed that equilibrium moisture content was reached in a similar time frame.

5. Conclusions

Mould growth in wood under fluctuating conditions (98–73% RH, 18/6 h) depends on the type of wood, such as botanical species (pine or spruce) or the type of wood (heartwood or sapwood). In pine sapwood, mould growth is almost independent of the direction of the fiber. The first microscopic signs of mould growth in pine were observed around day 76, and the first macroscopic signs were observed around day 90 from the beginning of the experiment. The spruce sapwood showed nutrient limits for mould growth. Mould growth was only visible microscopically, and the first signs were seen between the 72nd and 80th day. The heartwood was not suitable for mould growth under fluctuating conditions. The evaluation of mould growth under fluctuating conditions depends on the duration of uncomfortable conditions and the availability of nutrients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—P.R.; methodology—P.R.; formal analysis and investigation—P.R.; resources—P.R.; data curation—P.R. and Z.R.; writing—original draft preparation—P.R.; review and editing—P.R. and Z.R.; visualization—P.R.; project administration—P.R.; funding acquisition—P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the CZECH SCIENCE FOUNDATION (GAČR), grant number 20-12941S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to laboratory technicians Ivana Loušová, Petra Schůtová and Jan Richter for their contribution to the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RHrelative humidity [-]
CFU/mLcolony-forming unit per milliliter
MImould index [-]
MSImould subindex [-]
spp.plural form of species in single genus

References

  1. Platt, S.D.; Martin, C.J.; Hunt, S.M.; Lewis, C.W. Damp Housing, Mould Growth, and Symptomatic Health State. Br. Med. J. 1989, 298, 1673–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lacey, J. Indoor Aerobiology and Health. Building Mycology. 2006. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203974735-5/indoor-aerobiology-health-john-lacey (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  3. Baughman, A.V.; Arens, E.A. Indoor Humidity and Human Health-Part I: Literature Review of Health Effects of Humidity-Influenced Indoor Pollutants. Indoor Environ. Qual. 1996, 102, 193–211. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kz1z9cg (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  4. Burr, M.L.; Matthews, I.P.; Arthur, R.A.; Thorax, H.L.; Watson, H.L.; Gregory, C.J.; Dunstan, F.D.J.; Palmer, S.R. Effects on Patients with Asthma of Eradicating Visible Indoor Mould: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Thorax 2007, 62, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vereecken, E.; Roels, S. Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation. Build. Environ. 2012, 51, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brambilla, A.; Sangiorgio, A. Mould growth in energy efficient buildings: Causes, health implications and strategies to mitigate the risk. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 132, 110093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adan, O.C.G. On the Fungal Defacement of Interior Finishes. 1994. Available online: https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/on-the-fungal-defacement-of-interior-finishes (accessed on 23 January 2024).
  8. Ryparová, P.; Kopecký, P.; Staněk, K.; Richter, J.; Tywoniak, J. Laboratory Investigations of Mold Growth on Transverse and Longitudinal Wood Surfaces. Versionied Sci. 2023, 13, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andersen, B.; Frisvad, J.C. Characterization of Alternaria and Penicillium species from similar substrata based on growth at different temperature, pH and water activity. Syst. Vers. Microbiol. 2002, 25, 162–172. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grant, C.; Hunter, C.A.; Flannigan, B.; Bravery, A.F. The moisture requirements of moulds isolated from domestic dwellings. Int. Biodeterior. 1989, 25, 259–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arango, R.; Yang, V.; Lebow, S.; Lebow, P.; Wiemann, M.; Grejczyk, M.; DeWald, P. Variation in mold susceptibility among hardwood species under laboratory conditions. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 154, 105082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gobakken, L.R.; Lebow, P.K. Modelling mould growth on coated modified and unmodified wood substrates exposed outdoors. Wood Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 315–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lie, S.K.; Vestøl, G.I.; Høibø, O.; Gobakken, L.R. Surface mould growth on wood: A comparison of laboratory screening tests and outdoor performance. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Viitanen, H.; Toratti, T.; Makkonen, L.; Peuhkuri, R.; Ojanen, T.; Ruokolainen, L.; Räisänen, J. Towards modelling of decay risk of wooden materials. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2010, 68, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Johansson, P.; Wamming, T.; Bok, G.; Edlund, M.L. Mould growth on kiln-dried and air-dried timber. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2013, 71, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Viitanen, H.A. Modelling the Time Factor in the Development of Mould Fungi—The Effect of Critical Humidity and Temperature Conditions on Pine and Spruce Sapwood. Holzforschung 1997, 51, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Armolik, N.; Dickson, J.G. Minimum humidity requirement for germination of conidia of fungi associated with storage of grain. Phytopathology 1956, 46, 462–465. [Google Scholar]
  18. McGinnis, M.R. Indoor mould development and dispersal. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Johansson, P.; Ekstr-Tobin, A.; Svensson, T.; Bok, G. Laboratory study to determine the critical moisture level for mould growth on building materials. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 73, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lacey, J.; Hill, S.T.; Edwards, M.A. Micro-organisms in stored grains: Their enumeration and significance. Trop. Stored Prod. Inf. 1981, 39, 19–33. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, Y.; Chapman, B.; Wilson, M.; Hocking, A.D. Effect of agar concentration on the matric potential of glycerol agar media and the germination and growth of xerophilic and non-xerophilic fungi. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 133, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schuster, E.; Dunn-Coleman, N.; Frisvad, J.C.; Van Dijck, P.W. On the safety of Aspergillus niger—A review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59, 426–435. [Google Scholar]
  23. Abdel-Rahim, A.M.; Arbab, H.A. Factors Affecting Spore Germination in Aspergillus niger. Mycopathologia 1985, 89, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Sáenz, R.; Ramos, A.J.; Vinas, I.; Magan, N. Ecological determinants for germination and growth of some Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. from maize grain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 84, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hocking, A.D.; Miscamble, B.F.; Pitt, J.I. Water relations of Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Curvularia lunata and Curvularia pallescens. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. van Laarhoven, K.A.; Huinink, H.P.; Segers, F.J.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Adan, O.C. Separate effects of moisture content and water activity on the hyphal extension of Penicillium rubens on porous media. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 5089–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ruijten, P.; Huinink, H.P.; Adan, O.C.G. Penicillium rubens germination on desiccated and nutrient-depleted conditions depends on the water activity during sporogenesis. Fungal Biol. 2020, 124, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Flannigan, B.; Samson, R.A.; Miller, J.D. Microorganisms in Indoor Air. In Microorganisms in Home and Indoor Work Environments: Diversity, Health Impacts, Investigation and Control; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; Volume 2, pp. 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. Johansson, P. Determination of the Critical Moisture Level for Mould Growth on Building Materials. 2014. Available online: https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/determination-of-the-critical-moisture-level-for-mould-growth-on- (accessed on 29 November 2017).
  30. Ayerst, G. The Effects of Moisture and Temperature on Growth and Spore Germination in Some Fungi. Prod. Res. 1969, 5, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johansson, P.; Bok, G.; Ekstr-Tobin, A. The effect of cyclic moisture and temperature on mould growth onwood compared to steady state conditions. Build. Environ. 2013, 65, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tribe, H.T.; Mabadeje, S.A. Growth of moulds on media prepared without organic nutrients. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1972, 58, 127-IN12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Johansson, P.; Mjörnell, K.; Arfvidsson, J. Examples of Characteristics of Wood that Affect Mould Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2017, 75, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hukka, A.; Viitanen, H.A. A mathematical model of mould growth on wooden material. Wood Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Richter, J.; Staněk, K.; Kopecký, P.; Schůtová, P.; Tywoniak, J. Dynamic Moisture Transport in Spruce Wood—Experiment in Hygroscopic Range under Isothermal Conditions. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: Melville, NY, USA, 2023; Available online: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2894/1/020016/2910842 (accessed on 14 January 2024).
  36. Jang, Y.; Huh, N.; Lee, J.; Sung Lee, J.; Kim, G.H.; Kim, J.J. Phylogenetic analysis of major molds inhabiting woods and their discoloration characteristics. Part 2. Genus Penicillium. Holzforschung 2011, 65, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ryparová, P.; Rácová, Z. Characterisation of Micoorganism from Individual Layers of the Building Envelope (ETICS) and Methods of their Sampling. Key Eng. Mater. 2016, 714, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Venäläinen, M.; Harju, A.M.; Kainulainen, P.; Viitanen, H.; Nikulainen, H. Variation in the decay resistance and its relationship with other wood characteristics in old Scots pines. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The diagram with flow of experiment.
Figure 1. The diagram with flow of experiment.
Applsci 14 08417 g001
Figure 2. The images of the samples are divided according to anatomical species and direction of fibers with pine displayed on the first line and the spruce on the second. The row depicts samples from left to right: tangential surface (T), radial surface (R), and transversal surface (X).
Figure 2. The images of the samples are divided according to anatomical species and direction of fibers with pine displayed on the first line and the spruce on the second. The row depicts samples from left to right: tangential surface (T), radial surface (R), and transversal surface (X).
Applsci 14 08417 g002
Figure 3. The setup of conditions during the initial phase (precondition) and shown in the first cycles of the experiment; the cycles happened over 5 months.
Figure 3. The setup of conditions during the initial phase (precondition) and shown in the first cycles of the experiment; the cycles happened over 5 months.
Applsci 14 08417 g003
Figure 4. Aluminum track with samples.
Figure 4. Aluminum track with samples.
Applsci 14 08417 g004
Figure 5. Experimental apparatus; first published in [35].
Figure 5. Experimental apparatus; first published in [35].
Applsci 14 08417 g005
Figure 6. Illustrative images of PSX samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Figure 6. Illustrative images of PSX samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Applsci 14 08417 g006
Figure 7. Illustrative images of PSR samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Figure 7. Illustrative images of PSR samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Applsci 14 08417 g007
Figure 8. Illustrative images of PST samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Figure 8. Illustrative images of PST samples are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure) and at the macroscopic level. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The microscopic image with the number 4 is the image just before the end of the experiment. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Applsci 14 08417 g008
Figure 9. Illustrative images of samples made from spruce are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure). The samples are in columns SSR, SST and SHX. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Figure 9. Illustrative images of samples made from spruce are shown at the microscopic level (magnification bar in the figure). The samples are in columns SSR, SST and SHX. The number in the upper left corner of the image indicates the MI determined. The red circle highlights the typical life stage of the mould in that MI.
Applsci 14 08417 g009
Table 1. The nomenclature and amount of samples.
Table 1. The nomenclature and amount of samples.
Tree SpeciesDirection of Wood FiberNomenclatureAmount
Pine—SapwoodTangential surface P S T 6
Radial surface P S R 6
Transversal surface P S X 6
Pine—HeartwoodTangential surface P H T 6
Radial surface P H R 6
Transversal surface P H X 6
Spruce—SapwoodTangential surface S S T 6
Radial surface S S R 6
Transversal surface S S X 6
Spruce—HeartwoodTangential surface S H T 6
Radial surface S H R 6
Transversal surface S H X 6
Table 2. The definition of mould index and subsequent mould subindex, MI—mould index and SMI—mould subindex.
Table 2. The definition of mould index and subsequent mould subindex, MI—mould index and SMI—mould subindex.
MISMIMagnification of ObservationDescription
[-] [-] 40×
0000No growth, only spores
0.50.1–1Germination of spores
111–51–5Initial growth, first visible hyphae
1.55–10Initial growth hyphae clearly visible
2-10–30Development of mycelium with first aerial hyphae, moulds are almost exclusively visible under a microscope
3330–505–25Development of mycelium with sporangium, Moulds start visible macroscopically
3.550–7025–50Development of mycelium with sporangium, Moulds are visible macroscopically
4-70–9050–70Decay of mould or huge sporulation
90–10070–100
Table 3. Comparison of MI (mould growth rating scale) by several authors, Ryp—the mould index is used in this articles at [8], VTT—mould index defined at [14], Joh—mould index defined at [19], mould coverage of the sample was divided according to the method of observation with the following divisions: 1×—macroscopically by the naked eye and 40×—microscopically with a magnification of 40×, MI—mould index, SMI—mould subindex.
Table 3. Comparison of MI (mould growth rating scale) by several authors, Ryp—the mould index is used in this articles at [8], VTT—mould index defined at [14], Joh—mould index defined at [19], mould coverage of the sample was divided according to the method of observation with the following divisions: 1×—macroscopically by the naked eye and 40×—microscopically with a magnification of 40×, MI—mould index, SMI—mould subindex.
MagnificationMI by VTTMI by Joh and RypSMI by Ryp
40×
00000
0.1–110.5
1–51–511
5–1021.5
10–302-
30–505–25333
50–7025–5043.5
70–9050–70544
90–10070–1006
Table 4. The time dependence of achieving a given MI for pine sapwood. The MI was calculated as the average of all results in a given group with the expression of mould growth taken into account.
Table 4. The time dependence of achieving a given MI for pine sapwood. The MI was calculated as the average of all results in a given group with the expression of mould growth taken into account.
Samples
MI [-]/Time [day]
PSTPSXPSRPSRa
176.2577.757627
1.5--7945.7
281.379.58269
390.892.389.779
3.5120101.5110101
4-103.3-143
Table 5. The time dependence of achieving a given MI for spruce sapwood. MI was calculated as the average of all results in a given group with the expression of mould growth taken into account.
Table 5. The time dependence of achieving a given MI for spruce sapwood. MI was calculated as the average of all results in a given group with the expression of mould growth taken into account.
Samples
MI [-]/ Time [day]
SSTSSXSSR
170-72
1.591-98
2110-120
3---
3.5---
4---
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ryparová, P.; Rácová, Z. Characteristics of Mould Growth in Pine and Spruce Sapwood and Heartwood under Fluctuating Humidity. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188417

AMA Style

Ryparová P, Rácová Z. Characteristics of Mould Growth in Pine and Spruce Sapwood and Heartwood under Fluctuating Humidity. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(18):8417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ryparová, Pavla, and Zuzana Rácová. 2024. "Characteristics of Mould Growth in Pine and Spruce Sapwood and Heartwood under Fluctuating Humidity" Applied Sciences 14, no. 18: 8417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop