1. Introduction
Wireless power transfer systems have been studied by many researchers due to the system merits (WPT) such as cordless, wireless charging and safety in power transfer [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6]. Wireless power transfer has been applied to many applications including high power applications such as electric vehicle (EV) chargers and low power applications such as mobile power systems, intelligent mobiles, wearable electronic devices and sensors, etc. There are critical issues to be overcome in the practical design of wireless power transfer systems. One of the issues is the position and shape of the magnetic coupler. The most commonly used magnetic coupler structures in wireless charging are the circular and rectangular types. Based on the magnetic dipole moment theory, the magnetic dipole moment is proportional to the current magnitude and current loop area. Hence, the larger the current loop area is, the larger the magnetic dipole moment. Therefore, if the circular diameter is the same as the length and width of the rectangle, the rectangular type area is larger than 1.27 times the area of the circular type. Some literatures [
7,
8] discussed the shape of the inductive coupler and coupler array to generate better magnetic dipole moment to induce the desired energy.
In order to wirelessly deliver the energy from one side to the other side, except considering the magnetic coupler position and shape, the wireless converter design for different applications is also very important.
Figure 1 shows a full-bridge bidirectional wireless power transfer EV charger system [
9,
10,
11,
12]. The system can transfer energy from the grid to the vehicle (G2V) as well as transfer energy from the vehicle to the grid (V2G) [
12,
13,
14,
15,
16]. In this case the EV can be seen as an energy storage system that provides active power or reactive power to the grid whereas renewable energies such as solar energy or wind power are all in the power system. Bidirectional WPT is needed as well as unidirectional power transfer [
16]. Beyond the magnetic coupling and WPT circuit, the closed-loop control schemes are also essential to realize the WPT converter function. Closed-loop control schemes can be classified into three control types, including transmitter-side control [
17], receiver-side control [
18,
19], and dual-side control [
20]. Receiver-side control is better than transmitter-side control and dual-side control in maintaining the load requirement. The dual-side control is apparently more important for bidirectional power flow control.
A novel bidirectional WPT converter with only two switches is introduced in this paper. Dual-side control is also proposed for bidirectional power flow. Compared with the 8-switch full bridge bidirectional WPT converter, as shown in
Figure 1, which is often utilized in the EV charger system, the proposed 2-switch bidirectional WPT converter is more suitable for mobile power systems, portable and/or wearable electronic devices with low power applications.
Figure 2 demonstrates the cell phone power supply using mobile power with wireless power transfer technology for charging and discharging. Up to now, there is usually unidirectional wireless power transfer application in the mobile power supply. A bidirectional wireless power transfer technology for low power applications using simple circuitry with only two switches is proposed.
2. Analysis of Proposed Circuit Topology
The proposed bidirectional wireless power transfer circuit with primary side and secondary side circuits is shown in
Figure 3. Both the primary side and secondary side circuits can be the transmitter (
TX) or receiver (
RX). In the proposed topology, there is a boost inductor, an active switch, as well as a resonant capacitor and resonant coupled inductor in both the primary side and secondary side. The primary side circuit and secondary side circuit are designed to be symmetric to each other. However, the power direction is controlled by the switching duty ratios
D1 and
D2 of switch 1 and switch 2. While switch 1 is active and switch 2 is idle, the power flow is controlled from
Tx1 to
Rx1. While switch 2 is active and switch 1 is idle, the power flow is controlled from
Tx2 to
Rx2. Therefore, the energy can be transferred easily from primary side to the secondary side or from secondary side to the primary side.
For convenient explanation of how the circuit works, assume that the primary side is the transmitter and the secondary side is the receiver. The active switches are assumed to be ideal active switches with anti-paralleling body diode. To illustrate the circuit operation, the key waveforms of the proposed bidirectional wireless power transfer system during one switching period are shown in
Figure 4 and the circuit operation can be divided into four states to explain and discuss.
(1) State 1 (
t0 ≤
t <t1): In this mode, as shown in
Figure 5, the switch
S1 is turned on and switch
S2 is turned off as be a diode. Switch current
ids1 is increasing. Inductor
L1 is magnetized by the input voltage
V1 so as to increase the inductor current
iL1. The capacitor
C1 resonates with the coupled inductor
Lr1. The resonant current
ic1 is changed from positive to negative and produces the magnetic vector potential
through the primary side plane coil, i.e., the transmitter. The magnetic vector potential
is transmitted to the secondary side plane coil, i.e., the receiver and generates a resonance between the
Lr2 and
C2 so as to release energy to the inductor
L2 and load. The equivalent circuit equations can be described as Equations (1)–(6).
where
M is the mutual inductance and determined by the magnetic vector potential
and
. Therefore, the mutual inductance can be expressed as
.
N1 and
N2 are the numbers of turns of the primary and secondary side, respectively.
and
indicate the flux direction of coil 1 at primary side and coil 2 at secondary side, respectively.
is the distance between the primary-side and secondary-side windings.
(2) State 2 (
t1 ≤
t <t2): In this mode, as shown in
Figure 6, switch
S1 is turned on and switch
S2 is turned off. Switch current
ids1 is increasing. Inductor
L1 is magnetized by the input voltage
V1 so as to increase the inductor current
iL1. The capacitor
C1 resonates with the coupled inductor
Lr1 and the current
ic1 is negative. However,
VLr1 changes from zero to negative and
VLr2 changes from zero to positive. The magnetic vector potential
is transmitted from the primary side to the secondary side and generates a resonance between the
Lr2 and
C2 that releases energy to inductor
L2 and the load. The current
iC2 is positive. The equivalent circuit equations can be expressed as Equations (7)–(12).
(3) State 3 (
t2 ≤
t <t3): In this mode, as shown in
Figure 7, switch
S1 is turned off and
S2 is also turned off.
Ids1 current is negative. Inductor
L1 is magnetized by the input voltage
V1 so as to increase the inductor current
iL1. However,
ic1 is changed from negative to positive and
ic2 is changed from positive to negative. The magnetic vector potential
produced by the primary side plane coil is transmitted from the primary side to the secondary side and releases energy to inductor
L2 and the load. The equivalent circuit equations can be described as Equations (13)–(18).
(4) State 4 (
t3 ≤
t <t4): In this mode, as shown in
Figure 8, the switches
S1 and
S2 are turned off. Ids1 is zero, and
ic1 still remains positive and
ic2 still remains negative. The magnetic vector potential
is transmitted from primary side to the secondary side and generates a resonance between the
Lr2 and
C2 so as to release the energy to inductor
L2 and load. The current
ids2 remains the negative current to provide the load positive current. The equivalent circuit equations can be expressed as Equations (19)–(24).
3. Simulation and Experimental Results
To verify the feasibility of the proposed bidirectional wireless power transfer system, the well-known software Power SIM Version 9.0 (Powersim Inc, Rockville, M.D, USA, 2010) is adopted to perform the simulation process. In the simulation, the switches, capacitors and inductors are assumed to be ideal. A transformer with a loosely coupled inductor and relatively larger magnetizing inductor is adopted to simulate the transmitter and receiver.
Meanwhile, a prototype is constructed using a coreless plane transformer to verify the theoretical results. The simulation and experimental parameters for the proposed bidirectional wireless power transfer system are listed in
Table 1. Where the LED load is adopted to emulate the portable device, the mobile power supply is used to provide 5V voltage source. The transmitter and receiver coils are the same type and the photo is shown in
Table 1 with a detailed description. The instantaneous current and voltage in experiment are measured by the oscilloscope YOKOGAWA DLM2024.
The simulation and experimental results of resonant capacitor voltage
Vc1 and current
ic1 with the corresponding control switching signal are shown in
Figure 9a,b, respectively. As can be observed from
Figure 9, the capacitor voltage
Vc1 and current
ic1 are resonated following the switching frequency. One can see that both the simulation and experimental results are in very close agreement.
Figure 10a shows the inductor voltage
VL2 and current
iL2 simulation results with the corresponding control switching signal. The corresponding experimental results are shown in
Figure 10b. As can be seen from
Figure 10, the inductor
L2 stabilizes the output current. Although the simulation and experimental waveforms of
VL2 and
iL2 have something different due to the parasitic effects, the simulation and experimental behavior are very similar. The inductor voltage
VL1 and current
iL1 simulation and experimental results with the corresponding control switching signal are shown in
Figure 11a,b. From
Figure 11, one can find that both the simulation and experimental results are in very close agreement.
4. System Analysis and Discussion
With the aforementioned understanding of the proposed circuit operation principle and the circuit equivalent models, it is now straightforward to test and measured the proposed contactless bidirectional power transfer system in the experiments. The bidirectional power flow with dual-side duty ratio control will be tested and explained here. For convenient explanation, while the power is delivered form primary side to secondary side, one can call it forward mode operation. While the power is delivered from secondary side to the primary side, one can call it backward mode operation. In the proposed system the forward mode operation is controlled by the switch S1 duty ratio and the backward mode operation is controlled by the switch S2 duty ratio. The power flow direction can be controlled by the switch duty ratio always in the transmitter side.
The averaged output voltage and output current values are recorded in this section and measured by the oscilloscope YOKOGAWA DLM2024. The duty ratio control for forward mode and backward mode operation test results are shown in
Figure 12;
Figure 13, respectively. As can be observed from
Figure 12;
Figure 13, the output voltage and current can be controlled almost linearly by the duty ratio and the maximum output power point is at the 0.9 duty ratio, regardless whether the circuit is operated in the forward or backward mode. This represents that the system output power can be obviously and easily adjusted to increase or decrease for applications.
The switching frequency variation test results for forward and backward mode operations are shown in
Figure 14;
Figure 15, respectively. The circuit resonant frequency is designed at 50 kHz and the measured optimal switching frequency is also located at 50 kHz. If the switching frequency is between 40 kHz and 60 kHz near the resonant frequency, the output voltage and current are not seriously affected in the proposed circuit. This means that the resonant capacitor and/or resonant inductor value variation in the system due to the environment causing resonant frequency offset is easily corrected by properly adjusting the switching frequency. To explain how the distance between the windings affects the power transfer,
Figure 16;
Figure 17 show the output voltage and current vs. distance in the forward mode and backward mode operations, respectively, where there is 180-degree direction in coil 2 compared to coil 1 which has 0-digree direction. Coils 1 and 2 are overlapped with distance R. As can be observed from
Figure 16;
Figure 17, the voltage and current are decayed with increasing distance R and the magnetic vector potential
is decayed with the rate proportional to
. The measured power conversion efficiency is about 50%, while the coils are very close to each other.
According to the above test, the proposed wireless power transfer system can transfer the power flow bi-directionally and the output voltage and/or current can be adjusted through the switch duty ratios regardless whether the system is operated in the forward or backward mode. One low-power WPT application for mobile power is shown in
Figure 18.