Next Article in Journal
Neurological Music Therapy Rebuilds Structural Connectome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Upper Limb: Optimizing Management to Reduce Complications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phase I Targeted Combination Trial of Sorafenib and GW5074 in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082183
by Chien-Chang Kao 1,2, Ching-Liang Ho 3, Ming-Hsin Yang 1,2, Yi-Ta Tsai 2, Shu-Yu Liu 2, Ping-Ying Chang 3, Yi-Ying Wu 3, Jia-Hong Chen 3, Tzu-Chuan Huang 3, Ren-Hua Yehn 3, Ming-Shen Dai 3, Yeu-Chin Chen 3, Guang-Huan Sun 1 and Tai-Lung Cha 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082183
Submission received: 4 March 2022 / Revised: 7 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this study, Kao et al. have investigated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of a combination therapy consisting of two Raf inhibitors, namely sorafenib, and GW5074 in twelve solid cancer patients. Below are a few suggestions the authors may consider to improve their manuscript:

  • Since this combination approach employs two inhibitors against a common target, the relevance and rationale of using such an approach need to be emphasized in the text. 
  • The source of GW5074 and sorafenib should be provided in the methods section.
  • In some figures, such as 1C and 3C-F, the axes titles and figure labels are not legible. 
  • There are some typos and grammatical errors that should be rectified.
  • In line 287, it should be 'tumor relapsed' instead of 'tumor elapsed'
  • Lines 299-304, lack a suitable reference. 
  • Line 312; the full form of TRAEs should be stated at the site of first use.

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors please find my comments

1) Authors should be very cautious with their results based on this very small number of patients (eg PKs and interaction with sorafenib: what is the statistical power of the reductions described? ; and mainly with efficacy: abstract cites the combination whoed antitumor efficacy: as reviewer sees these results there is no any possibility to support that the combo has antitumor activity)

2)please define better what is the dose escalation scheme and use some references. 

3) can you explain why the DLT observation period was longer for the low dose? and not for the higher ones? (4 vs 8 wks?)

4) the PK animal study is not clearly related with the current phase I trial and should not be reported here

5) was pneumonia gr3 not DR

6) what is the evidence to reduce the standard dose of sorafenib in order to combine it with a drug that has not known activity?

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop