Next Article in Journal
Invasome: A Novel Nanocarrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Pb-Free Cs3Bi2I9 Perovskite as a Visible-Light-Active Photocatalyst for Organic Pollutant Degradation
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Features and Photoelectric Properties of Si-Doped GaAs under Gamma Irradiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Liquid-Plasma Hydrogenated Synthesis of Gray Titania with Engineered Surface Defects and Superior Photocatalytic Activity

Nanomaterials 2020, 10(2), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020342
by Feng Zhang 1,†, Guang Feng 2,3,†, Mengyun Hu 1,3, Yanwei Huang 1,3 and Heping Zeng 1,2,3,4,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(2), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020342
Submission received: 19 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 13 February 2020 / Published: 17 February 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Author Heping Zeng and his coauthors are describe, “Liquid-plasma hydrogenated synthesis of gray titania 3 with engineered surface defects and superior 4 photocatalytic activity”. These work are really interesting, I recommended accepted after revision.

Abstract should be revised to journal format and added resultant values in abstract. It like a general abstract.

What is main requirements for choosing materials for photocatalyst activities?.  Why TiO2 selected?

Author should briefly explained the experimental section and reaction mechanism.

In Characterization, Author provided instrumental details.

In XRD, authors missing peak 112, and 116??

Author mentioned, “full width at half maximum and height (FWMH) as well as the 122 area of the diffraction peak at 101 facet are unchanged after plasma treatment…” how to calculated area of the diffraction peak?

There are any relation in plasma treatment and plasma treatments?.

Conclusion should be revised.?

In Fig. 5A space between wavelength and nm unit.  And Figure 7, Binding energy for Binding Energy

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript titled "Liquid-plasma hydrogenated synthesis of gray titania with engineered surface defects and superior photocatalytic activity" authors F. Zhang et al. deals with the use of liquid plasma treatment under low temperature and atmospheric pressure to modify commercially available TiO2 (P25) into gray TiO2. The bright liquid plasma was generated on the surface of metallic titanium electrode by applying high voltage pulses with high frequency. The approach is interesting considering particularly the possibility to treat high amount of pristine TiO2 leading to a mass production of gray TiO2. The material was then well characterized by XRD, TEM, UV-Vis, Raman, XPS and EPR wich allow to complete comprehension of the structural modifications occurred at the pristine TiO2 material. Moreover, the authors pointed out a significant improvement of the photocatalytic behavior  of the material after the plasma treatment under visible light illumination.

I think the paper is an interesting paper for the scientific community working on photocatalysis. My only doubt concerns the possible contamination of the pristine material by the titanium cathode and/or Pt anode.

The authors discussed the role of the plasma to produce hydrogen environment (deriving from water dissociation) at/near the plasma region. Considering the high temperature involved in the process (2000-3000K) could the authors exclude some possible modification of the material by Ti species deriving from the Titanium cathode used to generate the plasma? The authors must properly discuss this aspect into the manuscript.

Moreover, in order to exclude some possible modification of the material deriving from Pt anode, a quantitative elemental analysis by ICP-OES or ICP-MS of the synthesized material.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept from my side.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript can be now accepted for publication.

Back to TopTop